Cytomegalovirus (CMV): specific lymphokine production in congenital CMV infection.

The studies reported here were designed to examine cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific lymphokine production in infants with congenital CMV infection to elucidate the role of the efferent limb of the immune response to this virus. Mononuclear cells (MNC) from adult control donors and congenitally infected infants were stimulated with mitogen (PHA) or antigens (CMV, mumps), and the supernatants were assayed for production of migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and interferon (IFN). Concordance was observed between lymphocyte proliferative responses to CMV antigen and production of MIF in both control donors and congenitally infected infants. PHA-stimulated cultures from both controls and patients resulted in immune-specific IFN-gamma production in all cases. CMV-stimulated MNC from controls produced IFN when lymphocyte proliferation responses to the antigen were present, whereas those with absent proliferation did not produce IFN. CMV-induced IFN was detected in several patients who had reduced lymphocyte proliferative responses to CMV. The predominant species of IFN stimulated by CMV was neutralized by anti-IFN-gamma, suggesting that CMV induced primarily immune-specific IFN-gamma. In some cases, IFN activity was also reduced to a lesser degree by anti-IFN-alpha, suggesting either the presence of IFN-alpha or of cross-reacting antigenic determinants shared by the two species of IFN. Mumps viral antigen induced primarily IFN-alpha regardless of the immunological status of the donor. We conclude that lymphokine production in congenital CMV reflects the state of activation and/or proliferation of CMV-specific T helper cells rather than an intrinsic defect in the efferent limb of the immune response.     

Envelope and nucleocapsid antigens of Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

A method for the purification and concentration of Cytomegalovirus nucleocapsids and particles complete with envelope is described. Antibody to either nucleocapsid or envelope antigens can be detected in human sera. In patients with CMV disease the antibodies to the envelope antigen could not be detected before the 3rd week after the beginning of disease whereas antibodies to the nucleocapsid were detected earlier.     

Evaluation of the Abbott AxSYM Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Assay in Conjunction with Other CMV IgM Tests and a CMV IgG Avidity Assay

The measurement of the avidity of cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies has been shown by several investigators to be useful in identifying and excluding primary CMV infections in pregnant women. In this work, we examined the diagnostic utility of reflex testing of CMV IgM-positive specimens from pregnant women by using a CMV IgG avidity assay. The utility of this approach was directly dependent on the sensitivity of the CMV IgM assay employed during the initial screen. The higher initial reactivity rate of the AxSYM CMV IgM assay was necessary in order to detect CMV IgM in specimens containing low-avidity CMV IgG antibodies, indicative of a primary CMV infection, which other CMV IgM assays (Behring, Vidas, Captia, and Eurogenetics) fail to detect in some cases. The use of the AxSYM CMV IgM assay, followed by an avidity test, should result in more accurate diagnosis of CMV infection in pregnant women.     

Long-Term Predictive Value of a Single Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA PCR Assay for CMV Disease in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients

Universal prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir is not cost-effective for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in human immunodeficiency virus infection. For a preemptive strategy to be considered, patients at highest risk for CMV disease need to be easily and accurately identified. In this study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a single CMV DNA PCR assay for the subsequent development of CMV disease were 0.75, 0.89, 0.75, and 0.89, respectively.     

Role of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG Avidity Testing in Diagnosing Primary CMV Infection during Pregnancy

The risk of intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus (CMV) during pregnancy is much greater for women who contract primary CMV infection after conception than for women with evidence of infection (circulating CMV antibodies) before conception. Thus, laboratory tests that aid in the identification of recent primary CMV infection are important tools for managing the care of pregnant women suspected of having been exposed to CMV. CMV IgM detection is a sensitive marker of primary CMV infection, but its specificity is poor because CMV IgM is also produced during viral reactivation and persists following primary infection in some individuals. Studies conducted over the last 20 years convincingly demonstrate that measurement of CMV IgG avidity is both a sensitive and a specific method for identifying pregnant women with recent primary CMV infection and thus at increased risk for vertical CMV transmission. IgG avidity is defined as the strength with which IgG binds to antigenic epitopes expressed by a given protein; it matures gradually during the 6 months following primary infection. Low CMV IgG avidity is an accurate indicator of primary infection within the preceding 3 to 4 months, whereas high avidity excludes primary infection within the preceding 3 months. In this minireview, we summarize published data demonstrating the clinical utility of CMV IgG avidity results for estimating time since primary infection in pregnant women, describe commercially available CMV IgG avidity assays, and discuss some of the issues and controversies surrounding CMV IgG avidity testing during pregnancy.     

Development of a New Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Immunoblot for Detection of CMV-Specific IgM

We developed a new cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) immunoblot to detect CMV-specific IgM in human sera. The new test contains four viral proteins (vp150, vp82, vp65, and vp28) purified from viral particles and four recombinant proteins (rp150, rp130, rp52, and rp38) purified from Escherichia coli. These antigens were individually loaded onto nitrocellulose strips, and the strips were then used to detect CMV-specific IgM by using a μ-specific conjugate. The new assay was evaluated in parallel with one or two IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to test 592 serum samples from different groups of latently or acutely infected individuals. The sensitivity of the new assay with respect to the consensus of two ELISAs was 100%, the specificity was 98.6%, the positive predictive value was 96.9%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. We also evaluated the new test by testing sera from pregnant women and transplant recipients with a known clinical history. Our results suggest that the new test combines high sensitivity with high specificity, characteristics that are mutually exclusive with the other commercially available tests. Furthermore, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the number of IgM-reactive bands and the elevated risk of transmission from CMV-infected pregnant women to their offspring.     

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in AIDS patients is associated with a CD3 receptor-mediated T cell hyporesponsiveness

HIV⁺ individuals with human CMV (HCMV) reactivation have a CD3 receptor-mediated T cell hyporesponsiveness when compared with CD4-matched HIV⁺ and HCMV^?control groups. The impairment of proliferation was not reversed by exogenous IL-2. A typical increase in NFκB expression was observed following cross-linking of the CD3 receptor, but did not lead to increased CD25 cell surface expression or cell proliferation. The HCMV-induced non-responsiveness was not observed when cells were stimulated with phorbol esters. Lymphocytes cultured with media collected from cell cultures infected with HCMV showed a dose-dependent inhibition in the total T cell population even though cells staining dually for CD8/57 increased in number. The altered growth factor requirements of CD8/57⁺ cells may therefore account for their presence in AIDS and patients following bone marrow transplantation.     

Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; P < .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; P < .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; P= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; P < .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; P = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.     

Comparison of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV Quantiferon Gamma Interferon-Releasing Assays in Assessing Risk of CMV Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Assessing cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) represents an appealing strategy for identifying transplant recipients at risk of infection. In this study, we compared two gamma interferon-releasing assays (IGRAs), Quantiferon-CMV and CMV enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT), to determine the ability of each test to predict protective CMV-specific T-cell responses. Two hundred twenty-one Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT tests were conducted on 120 adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including 100 CMV-seropositive transplant recipients (R⁺) and 20 CMV-seronegative transplant recipients of a CMV-positive donor (D⁺/R⁻). As a control cohort, 39 healthy adult subjects (including 33 CMV-seropositive and 6 CMV-seronegative subjects) were enrolled. CMV IgG serology was used as a reference for both tests. In the CMV-seropositive individuals, the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays provided 46% concordance with the serology, 12% discordance, 18% disagreement between ELISPOT or Quantiferon-CMV and the serology, and 24% gray areas when one or both tests resulted in weak positives. None of the CMV-seronegative subjects showed detectable responses in the ELISPOT or the Quantiferon-CMV test. In transplant recipients, both the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays positively correlated with each other and negatively correlated with CMV DNAemia in a significant way (P < 0.05). During the antiviral prophylaxis, all 20 D⁺/R⁻ KTRs we examined displayed undetectable Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT results, and there was no evidence of CMV seroconversion. The receiving operator curve (ROC) statistical analysis revealed similar specificities and sensitivities in predicting detectable viremia (areas under the curve [AUC], 0.66 and 0.62 for Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT, respectively). ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV values of >150 spots/200,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and >1 to 6 IU gamma interferon (IFN-γ) were associated with protection from CMV infection (odds ratios [OR], 5 and 8.75, respectively). In transplant recipients, the two tests displayed similar abilities for predicting CMV infection. Both the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays require several ameliorations to avoid false-negative results.     

Fully Automated Quantification of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Whole Blood with the New Sensitive Abbott RealTime CMV Assay in the Era of the CMV International Standard

Fully standardized reproducible and sensitive quantification assays for cytomegalovirus (CMV) are needed to better define thresholds for antiviral therapy initiation and interruption. We evaluated the newly released Abbott RealTime CMV assay for CMV quantification in whole blood (WB) that includes automated extraction and amplification (m2000 RealTime system). Sensitivity, accuracy, linearity, and intra- and interassay variability were validated in a WB matrix using Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) panels and the WHO international standard (IS). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 1.37% and 2.09% at 5 log₁₀ copies/ml and 2.41% and 3.80% at 3 log₁₀ copies/ml, respectively. According to expected values for the QCMD and Abbott RealTime CMV methods, the lower limits of quantification were 104 and <50 copies/ml, respectively. The conversion factor between international units and copies (2.18), determined from serial dilutions of the WHO IS in WB, was significantly different from the factor provided by the manufacturer (1.56) (P = 0.001). Results from 302 clinical samples were compared with those from the Qiagen artus CMV assay on the same m2000 RealTime system. The two assays provided highly concordant results (concordance correlation coefficient, 0.92), but the Abbott RealTime CMV assay detected and quantified, respectively, 20.6% and 47.8% more samples than the Qiagen/artus CMV assay. The sensitivity and reproducibility of the results, along with the automation, fulfilled the quality requirements for implementation of the Abbott RealTime CMV assay in clinical settings. Our results highlight the need for careful validation of conversion factors provided by the manufacturers for the WHO IS in WB to allow future comparison of results obtained with different assays.     

Comparative Quantitation of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with CMV Infection by Using Two High-Throughput Automated Systems

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in clinical specimens is progressively becoming a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host. We evaluated two automated and reproducible PCR tests, the LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif.), for the detection of CMV DNA in blood samples from transplant recipients with CMV infection as determined by shell vial culture. Following a log transformation analysis, the mean CMV DNA in plasma (PL), whole blood (WB), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using the LightCycler was 6.79 copies per ml, 7.23 copies per ml, 6.38 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, and 6.27 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, respectively. This compares to 7.86 copies per ml, 8.37 copies per ml, 7.59 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, and 7.44 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, respectively, using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor. While higher CMV DNA levels were observed for the various blood compartments analyzed using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor, a high degree of correlation was evident between the two automated systems (jackknife correlation r = PL 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.64, 0.90], WB 0.77 [95% CI; 0.62, 0.92], PBL 0.77 [95% CI; 0.67, 0.88], and PBMC 0.81 [95% CI; 0.72, 0.89], all P < 0.001). Therefore, we conclude that either automated diagnostic system is accurate for CMV DNA quantitation.     

Validation of an In-House Assay for Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin G (CMV IgG) Avidity and Relationship of Avidity to CMV IgM Levels

Measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) avidity has proven to be a powerful tool for distinguishing primary from nonprimary CMV infection. An in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measuring CMV IgG avidity was validated using 84 sera from pregnant women who had recently seroconverted following primary CMV infection and 74 sera from individuals with past CMV infection (IgG-positive and IgM-negative profile). Of the 84 sera from pregnant women, 73 sera were collected within 120 days of the last IgG-negative sample, and 72 of these 73 sera (99%) exhibited an avidity index (AI) of <50%. In contrast, 71 of 74 (96%) sera from individuals with past CMV infection exhibited CMV AI values of >60%. Thus, low avidity in the in-house ELISA was defined as an AI of 50%, whereas high avidity was defined as an AI of 60%. In additional studies, the relationship between CMV IgG avidity and CMV IgM levels was examined using 64 CMV IgG-positive sera (time since seroconversion unknown) exhibiting equivocal or positive results in a CMV IgM capture ELISA (Diamedix). Of these 64 sera, 29 exhibited IgM index values of 3.0, and 27 of these 29 (93%) exhibited low IgG avidity. A similar trend was observed when a subset of these 64 sera (n = 48) was tested in another CMV IgM capture ELISA (Trinity); of 18 sera with IgM index values of 3.0, 17 (94%) exhibited low IgG avidity. These findings demonstrate the validity of an in-house ELISA for CMV IgG avidity and further show that strong reactivity of CMV IgG-positive sera in either of two CMV IgM capture assays is a reliable indicator of low CMV IgG avidity, and thus, recent CMV infection.     

Cytomegalovirus cultures during maintenance DHPG therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Nine patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis on maintenance therapy with ganciclovir: 9(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl) guanine (DHPG) at high dose (30 mg/kg/week) or low dose (20 mg/kg/week) were tested every 1-2 weeks for CMV isolation from blood, saliva, and urine. Duration of therapy ranged from 1.5 to 12 months (average 5.3 months). During pretreatment and low-dose and high-dose maintenance therapy, CMV was isolated from 48/59 (81%), 90/211 (43%), and 40/290 (14%) of specimens, respectively. Three patients with progressive retinitis had viraemia more frequently than did six patients with stable retinitis, CMV being isolated from 29/47 (62%) and 17/121 (14%) of blood samples, respectively.     

Potential Impact of Different Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM Assays on an Algorithm Requiring IgM Reactivity as a Criterion for Measuring CMV IgG Avidity

The measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity is a powerful tool for identifying individuals with recent CMV infection. Because such patients are expected to be positive for CMV IgM, several investigators have suggested that CMV IgG-positive sera first be screened for CMV IgM and then only the IgM-reactive sera be tested for avidity. We investigated the impact of different CMV IgM assays on such a reflexing algorithm using a panel of 369 consecutive IgG-positive serum samples submitted for avidity testing. A bead-based immunofluorescent assay (BIFA) identified 105 IgM-positive serum samples, whereas an IgM-capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) identified 48 IgM-positive serum samples; this marked difference led us to evaluate additional CMV IgM assays. An enzyme-linked immunofluorescent assay (ELFA) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) were used to test all sera with discordant BIFA/EIA results, all sera with concordant positive results, and selected sera with concordant negative results. The findings indicated that the ELFA would identify 74 CMV IgM-positive samples and the CIA would identify 64. Of the 23 low-avidity serum samples, 2 were IgM negative by BIFA, 3 by ELFA and CIA, and 4 by EIA; of the 23 intermediate-avidity serum samples, 6 were IgM negative by BIFA, 10 by ELFA, and 15 by EIA and CIA. In both these avidity groups, BIFA IgM-negative sera were also negative by the other 3 assays. These findings demonstrate that an algorithm requiring CMV IgM reactivity as a criterion for CMV IgG avidity testing does not identify all low-avidity sera and thus misses some cases of acute CMV infection.     

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay is more sensitive than shell vial cultures for rapid detection of CMV in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes.

We compared the cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay with shell vial cultures of polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL)-enriched blood fractions for rapid diagnosis of CMV viremia. PMNL fractions of 280 blood specimens from 171 patients (170 solid-organ transplant recipients and 1 patient undergoing pretransplant evaluation) were inoculated in shell vial and conventional CMV cultures. A commercially available kit (CMV-vue kit; INCSTAR Corp.) was used for the CMV antigenemia assay, in which PMNL preparations were stained with monoclonal antibodies directed against the CMV protein pp65. Mixed-leukocyte blood fractions from the same blood specimens were inoculated in parallel shell vial and conventional cultures. CMV viremia (defined by the isolation of CMV in conventional cultures) was detected in 32 (13%) of 245 PMNL fractions included in the final analysis. Twenty-eight (87.5%) were also positive in the CMV antigenemia assay, whereas 22 (69%) were positive in shell vial cultures. Ten (4%) additional PMNL fractions positive only in the CMV antigenemia assay were from eight patients with active CMV infections (six patients), who had previous or subsequent episodes of CMV viremia (seven patients), or in whom CMV was isolated in cultures of simultaneously obtained mixed-leukocyte fractions (three patients). Overall, the CMV antigenemia assay was significantly more sensitive than shell vial cultures for detection of CMV in the PMNL fraction of blood leukocytes (P < 0.01, McNemar's test), and we recommend it as the method of choice for rapid diagnosis of CMV viremia.     

白血病患儿巨细胞病毒感染的PCR与抗原检测方法比较

目的 对不同种类标本应用ＰＣＲ检测巨细胞病毒（ｃｙｔｏｍｅｇａｌｏｖｉｒｕｓ,ＣＭＶ）ＤＮＡ,并与外周血白细胞ＣＭＶ抗体检测比较,以了解ＰＣＲ方法在诊断白血病患儿活动性ＣＭＶ感染时的意义。方法 实验组为３１例白血病患儿,对照组为３１例免疫功能正常儿童,两组儿童的年龄、性别无差异。应用ＰＣＲ方法检测血清、尿液和脑脊液ＣＭＶ ＤＮＡ,间接免疫荧光方法检测外周血白细胞ＣＭＶ抗原,ＥＬＩＳＡ方法检测血清抗     

Comparison of the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV QuantiFERON Cell-Mediated Immune Assays in CMV-Seropositive and -Seronegative Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of congenital infection leading to birth defects and sensorineural anomalies, including deafness. Recently, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) in pregnant women has been shown to correlate with congenital CMV transmission. In this study, two interferon gamma release assays (IGRA), the CMV enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) and CMV QuantiFERON assays, detecting CMV-specific CMI were compared. These assays were performed for 80 CMV-infected (57 primarily and 23 nonprimarily) pregnant women and 115 controls, including 89 healthy CMV-seropositive pregnant women without active CMV infection, 15 CMV-seronegative pregnant women, and 11 seropositive or seronegative nonpregnant women. Statistical tests, including frequency distribution analysis, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test for equality on unmatched data, and lowess smoothing local regression, were employed to determine statistical differences between groups and correlation between the assays. The CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay data were not normally distributed and did not display equal variance. The CMV ELISPOT but not CMV QuantiFERON assay displayed significant higher values for primarily CMV-infected women than for the healthy seropositive pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P = 0.0057 and 0.0379, respectively) and those with nonprimary infections (P = 0.0104). The lowess local regression model comparing the assays on an individual basis showed a value bandwidth of 0.8. Both assays were highly accurate in discriminating CMV-seronegative pregnant women. The CMV ELISPOT assay was more effective than CMV-QuantiFERON in differentiating primary from the nonprimary infections. A substantial degree of variability exists between CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay results for CMV-seropositive pregnant women.