Outcome after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Because valve replacement for aortic stenosis (AS) remains a difficult surgical challenge in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction, the immediate and long-term outcomes, and evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in this setting, were analyzed. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients with severe AS (valve area < or =1 cm2) and reduced LVEF (< or =40%) who underwent valve replacement surgery at the authors' institution between April 1998 and December 2003 and were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics included: LVEF 33 +/- 6%, mean transaortic pressure gradient 46 +/- 13 mmHg, and aortic valve area 0.58 +/- 0.15 cm2. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 15 patients (35%). Perioperative (30-day) mortality was 2.3%, with 39.5% morbidity. During a mean follow up of 33.4 +/- 17.6 months, eight patients died. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of five-year survival was 75.3%. Postoperatively, none of the survivors remained in NYHA functional classes III-IV. The postoperative LVEF assessed in 81.8% of survivors had improved. Multivariate analysis associated improved LVEF with a higher preoperative mean transaortic pressure gradient (p = 0.0009) and a higher preoperative LVEF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with severe AS and reduced LVEF can undergo valve replacement with low perioperative mortality and moderate postoperative morbidity. Good long-term survival with good NYHA functional status and improved LVEF can be obtained.     

Effect of preoperative ejection fraction, left ventricular systolic dimension and hemoglobin level on survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation

Surgical indications in patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EF) remain to be established. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic indicators after surgery in patients with severe AR and normal LV systolic function. Preoperative clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were evaluated in 284 consecutive patients with chronic severe AR who underwent aortic valve surgery. Of these patients, 169 had normal (≥50%) and 115 had depressed (<50%) preoperative LV EFs. All-cause mortality was observed for a median of 39.9 months. Of 284 patients, 7 (4.4%) with normal LV EFs and 15 (12.0%) with depressed LV EFs died during follow-up after aortic valve surgery (p = 0.017). In patients with normal EFs, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that large LV end-systolic dimension and low plasma hemoglobin level were independent predictors of postsurgical mortality. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that LV end-systolic dimension ≥45 mm and hemoglobin level <13.4 g/dl were the best cut-off values for postoperative mortality. In conclusion, preoperative LV end-systolic dimension and hemoglobin level are independent prognostic factors of survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic severe AR and normal LV EFs.     

Comparison of brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels versus logistic EuroSCORE in predicting in-hospital and late postoperative mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for symptomatic aortic stenosis

The accuracy of the logistic EuroSCORE (logES), a widely used risk prediction algorithm for cardiac surgery including aortic valve surgery, usually overestimates observed perioperative mortality. Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a poor short-term outcome after aortic valve replacement. We aimed to compare BNP with the logES for predicting short- and long-term outcome in symptomatic patients with severe AS undergoing aortic valve replacement. We prospectively studied 144 consecutive patients referred for aortic valve replacement (42% women, 73 +/- 9 years, mean aortic gradient 51 +/- 18 mm Hg, and left ventricular ejection fraction 61 +/- 11%) undergoing either isolated aortic valve replacement (58%) or combined to bypass grafting. Both plasma BNP and logES was estimated before surgery. The median BNP plasma level and logES were 157 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 61 to 440) and 6.6% (IQR 4.2 to 12.2), respectively. The perioperative mortality was 6% and the overall mortality by the end of the study was 13%. Patients with logES >10.1% (upper tertile) had a higher risk of dying over time (hazard ratio [HR] 2.86, p = 0.037), as had patients with BNP >312 pg/ml (HR 9.01, p <0.001). Discrimination (based on C statistic) and model performance (based on Akaike information criterion) were better for BNP than for logES. At the bivariable analysis, only BNP was an independent predictor of death (HR 8.2, p = 0.002). Preoperative BNP was even more accurate than logES in predicting outcome. In conclusion, in symptomatic patients with severe AS, high preoperative BNP plasma level and high logES confirm their predicting value for short- and long-term outcome.     

心房颤动患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后1年随访结果

目的:探讨经导管主动脉瓣植入（TAVI）术前合并心房颤动（房颤）是否会对患者的预后产生影响。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究。入选2016年5月至2020年11月于北部战区总医院住院并成功接受TAVI治疗且顺利出院的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者115例。根据入选患者是否合并房颤将其分为房颤组（21例）及非房颤组（94例）。随访纳...     

Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) among patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a low transvalvular gradient (TVG) is associated with improved survival. BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with severe AS with severe LV dysfunction and a low TVG remains controversial. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1998, we evaluated 68 patients who underwent AVR at our institution (AVR group) and 89 patients who did not undergo AVR (control group), with an aortic valve area < or = 0.75 cm(2), LV ejection fraction < or = 35% and mean gradient < or = 30 mm Hg. Using propensity analysis, survival was compared between a cohort of 39 patients in the AVR group and 56 patients in the control group. RESULTS: Despite well-matched baseline characteristics among propensity-matched patients, the one- and four-year survival rates were markedly improved in patients in the AVR group (82% and 78%), as compared with patients in the control group (41% and 15%; p < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, the main predictor of improved survival was AVR (adjusted risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.39; p < 0.0001). The only other predictors of mortality were age and the serum creatinine level. CONCLUSIONS: Among select patients with severe AS, severe LV dysfunction and a low TVG, AVR was associated with significantly improved survival.     

Severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: clinical profile and prognostic implications

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 47 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) from 1987 to 1999. BACKGROUND: The prognostic implications of severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe AS are poorly understood. METHODS: The mean age of patients was 78 years (range 47 to 91 years), and 37 patients (79%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 37 patients (79%) and 10 patients (21%) were treated conservatively. RESULTS: In the group that had AVR, there were six perioperative deaths (16%) and nine late deaths, resulting in a total mortality of 32%. In the conservatively treated group, there were eight deaths (80%) on follow-up. Severe PHT was an independent predictor of perioperative mortality. However, perioperative mortality was independent of the severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Aortic valve replacement was associated with significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, the severity of PHT and NYHA functional class. The difference between long-term survival of the operative survivors and the expected survival from life tables was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for patients with AS and severe PHT treated conservatively without AVR is dismal. Although AVR is associated with higher than usual mortality, the potential benefits outweigh the risk of surgery.     

Atrial fibrillation in patients with severe aortic stenosis

BackgroundThere has been no previous report evaluating the long impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the clinical outcomes stratified by the initial management [conservative or aortic valve replacement (AVR)] strategies of severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsWe analyzed 3815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry. Patients with AF were defined as those having a history of AF when severe AS was found on the index echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve–related death or hospitalization for heart failure.ResultsThe cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with AF than in those without AF (44.2 % versus 33.2 %, HR 1.54, 95 % CI 1.35–1.76). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of AF relative to no AF remained significant (HR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.16–1.56). The magnitude of excess adjusted risk of AF for the primary outcome measure was greater in the initial AVR stratum (N = 1197, HR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.36–2.78) than in the conservative stratum (N = 2618, HR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.08–1.47) with a significant interaction (p = 0.04). In patients with AF, there was a significant excess adjusted risk of paroxysmal AF (N = 254) relative to chronic AF (N = 528) for the primary outcome measure (HR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.01–1.78).ConclusionsIn patients with severe AS, concomitant AF was independently associated with worse clinical outcomes regardless of the initial management strategies. In those patients with conservative strategy, paroxysmal AF is stronger risk factor than chronic AF.     

Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: A significant proportion of patients with severe valvular aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function have low transvalvular gradients. The study aim was to determine the mechanisms and outcome of patients with this hemodynamic profile of AS. METHODS: Among 1,679 patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography for the evaluation of AS at the authors' institution, 215 (105 females, 110 males; mean age: 77 +/- 10 years) had isolated AS (mean aortic valve area index 0.39 +/- 0.1 cm2/m2), normal sinus rhythm and normal LV ejection fraction. The mean follow up was 23 +/- 12 months, and the end-points were mortality, aortic valve replacement (AVR), or mortality or AVR. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients had a transvalvular mean gradient (MG) <30 mmHg (MG(low)) and 168 had MG > or = 30 mmHg (MG(high)). Compared to MG(high), the MG(low) group had a higher prevalence of hypertension, lower LV end-diastolic volume index (47 +/- 9 versus 56 +/- 12 ml/m2, p <0.0001), lower LV stroke vol-ume index (37 +/- 12 versus 41 +/- 11 ml/beat, p <0.0002), a lesser severity of stenosis (aortic valve area index 0.37 +/- 0.09 versus 0.46 +/- 0.09 cm2/m2, p <0.0001) and a higher systemic vascular resistance (2163 +/- 754 versus 1879 +/- 528 dyne cm s(-5). The LV end-diastolic volume index, systemic vascular resistance and energy loss index were predictors of MG <30 mmHg (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.12, 0.62; OR = 3.05, 95% CI, 1.71, 6.26; and OR = 6.76, 95% CI, 3.44,15.38, respectively). MG <30 mmHg (MGhigh) was associated with almost 50% lower referral to surgery and a two-fold increase in preoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: In severe AS with a normal LV ejection fraction, MG <30 mmHg is related to a lesser severity of stenosis, a smaller LV volume, a lower flow rate and a higher systemic vascular resistance. Compared to the MG(high) group, these patients were less frequently referred to surgery and had a higher mortality.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The outcome of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis is worse in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Such dysfunction in aortic stenosis may be reversible if caused by afterload mismatch, but not if it is caused by superimposed myocardial infarction. METHODS: From our echocardiography database, 55 patients with severe aortic stenosis (valve area < or =0.75 cm2) and ejection fractions of 30% or lower who subsequently underwent aortic valve replacement were included. The operative mortality and clinical follow-up were detailed. RESULTS: There were 10 perioperative deaths (operative mortality, 18%). Twenty (36%) of the 55 patients had a prior myocardial infarction. In the 35 patients without prior myocardial infarction, there was only 1 death (3%). In contrast, 9 of 20 patients with prior myocardial infarction died (mortality rate, 45%; P< or =.001). The factors significantly associated with perioperative death on univariate analysis (functional class, mean aortic gradient, and prior myocardial infarction) were entered into a model for stepwise logistic regression. This multivariate analysis showed that only prior myocardial infarction was independently associated with perioperative death (odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-92.1; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function is extremely high if the patients have had a prior myocardial infarction. This information should be factored into the risk-benefit analysis that is done preoperatively for these patients, and it may preclude operation for some.     

Twenty-five year experience with balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the primary therapy for congenital aortic stenosis (AS). Few reports describe long-term outcomes. In this study, a retrospective single-institution review was performed of patients who underwent BAV for congenital AS. The following end points were evaluated: moderate or severe aortic insufficiency (AI) by echocardiography, aortic valve replacement, repeat BAV, surgical aortic valvotomy, and transplantation or death. From 1985 to 2009, 272 patients who underwent BAV at ages 1 day to 30.5 years were followed for 5.8 ± 6.7 years. Transplantation or death occurred in 24 patients (9%) and was associated with depressed baseline left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF) (p = 0.04). Aortic valve replacement occurred in 42 patients (15%) at a median of 3.5 years (interquartile range 75 days to 5.9 years) after BAV and was associated with post-BAV gradient ≥25 mm Hg (p = 0.02), the presence of post-BAV AI (p = 0.03), and below-average baseline LVSF (p = 0.04). AI was found in 83 patients (31%) at a median of 4.8 years (interquartile range 1.4 to 8.7) and was inversely related to post-BAV gradient ≥25 mm Hg (p <0.04). AI was associated with depressed baseline LVSF (p = 0.02). Repeat valvuloplasty (balloon or surgical) occurred in 37 patients (15%) at a median of 0.51 years (interquartile range 0.10 to 5.15) and was associated with neonatal BAV (p <0.01), post-BAV gradient ≥25 mm Hg (p = 0.03), and depressed baseline LVSF (p = 0.05). In conclusion, BAV confers long-term benefits to most patients with congenital AS. Neonates, patients with post-BAV gradients ≥25 mm Hg, and patients with lower baseline LVSF experienced worse outcomes.     

Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Late reoperation for failed aortic homograft is widely regarded as a high-risk procedure. A review is presented of the authors' experience of redo-aortic valve replacement (re-do AVR) examining factors which affect, and whether a previous aortic homograft replacement influences, operative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive re-do AVR performed at the authors' institution between 1998 and 2002. RESULTS: During the study period, 178 patients (125 males, 53 females; mean age 52.4 years; range: 16-85 years) underwent re-do AVR. The group included first-time (72%), second-time (20%), and more than third-time re-do AVR (8%). Forty-six patients (26%) received a homograft (group I), and 132 (74%) a stented biological/mechanical valve (group II). The two groups were matched for baseline clinical characteristics and operative variables. The type of explanted valve, and preoperative and operative variables, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. Primary outcome was defined as 30-day mortality, and secondary outcome as postoperative complications. The overall 30-day mortality was 12.3%, but was much lower (4.5%) for elective isolated and multiple re-do AVR. Univariate analysis showed significant predictors of 30-day mortality to be: age >65 years (p = 0.02); renal dysfunction (p = 0.005); preoperative unstable status (p = 0.03); preoperative NYHA class III/IV dyspnea (p = 0.02); non-elective operation (p = 0.01); preoperative arrhythmia (p = 0.005); history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.002); preoperative cardiogenic shock (p = 0.03); impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% (p = 0.04); and other valvular procedure(s) performed simultaneously (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, the only significant predictors of 30-day mortality were impaired LVEF (p = 0.03) and a history of COPD (p = 0.007). Group I patients had a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (10.2+/-5.9 versus 14.1+/-12.5 days; p = 0.009), but there were no significant differences between groups in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: A previous aortic homograft replacement was not associated with an increased operative risk at the time of re-do AVR. A history was COPD was an important predictor of 30-day mortality, and this finding requires further investigation.     

Comparison of outcome of higher versus lower transvalvular gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low (<40%) left ventricular ejection fraction

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with poor outcome. This analysis was designed primarily to describe the clinical course of a large series of consecutive patients with severe AS and low ejection fraction (EF) (<40%) who, because of high surgical risk, were referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation consideration. A cohort of 270 patients with severe AS and low EF (<40%) who were referred to participate in a clinical trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation was studied. Clinical, hemodynamic, and periprocedural complications and follow-up mortality data were collected and compared between patients with low mean transvalvular gradients (≤40 mm Hg, n = 170 [63%]) and high transvalvular gradients (>40 mm Hg, n = 100 [37%]). Patients with low gradients were younger (mean age 79.8 ± 9.1 vs 83.8 ± 7.7 years, p <0.001) and had higher incidences of coronary artery disease and renal failure. Mean aortic valve area was larger (0.73 ± 0.23 vs 0.53 ± 0.18 cm(2), p <0.001), while mean EF (26.4 ± 6.9% vs 30.5% ± 6.6%, p <0.001), cardiac output (3.7 ± 1.1 vs 4.1 ± 1.3 L/min, p = 0.04), and cardiac index (1.9 ± 0.5 vs 2.1 ± 0.6 L/min/m(2), p = 0.04) were lower in patients with lower gradients compared to those with higher gradients, respectively. Mortality was higher in patients with low gradients (53.8%) at a mean follow-up of 151 days compared to those with high gradients (41%) at a mean follow-up of 256 days (p = 0.01). In conclusion, patients with severe AS and low EF with low transvalvular gradients are at higher risk for worse outcomes compared to patients with high transvalvular gradients. Surgery or transcatheter aortic valve implantation treatment and high baseline transvalvular gradient are associated with EF improvement.     

Comparison of ascending aortic size in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis treated with versus without a statin drug

Ascending aortic dilation commonly occurs in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Statins have been shown to reduce the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and slow the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of statins in slowing ascending aortic dilation in patients with BAV is unknown. We sought to compare the ascending aortic dimensions in patients with BAV stenosis treated with versus without a statin. From our catheterization laboratory database, all patients undergoing preoperative coronary angiography before aortic valve with or without ascending aorta replacement for bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) from 2004 to 2007 were identified. The ascending aortic size was measured on their preoperative transesophageal echocardiogram. Data on statin use were obtained from chart review, and the ascending aortic size was compared between patients taking and not taking a statin. The study sample included 147 patients, of whom 76 were treated with statins (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 72% men) and 71 were not (mean age 59 ± 12 years, 68% men). The total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly lower in the statin group. The ascending aorta size was significantly lower in the statin subgroup of the pure severe AS group (3.6 ± 0.7 cm vs 3.9 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.01) but not in the mixed severe AS and severe aortic regurgitation group. In the pure severe AS group, significantly fewer patients taking a statin had an ascending aorta ≥ 4 cm (29% vs 52%, p < 0.02). On multivariate analysis, statin use was the only independent predictor of aortic size and was associated with a 0.33-cm reduction in aortic size (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.59, p < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with statin-treated BAV stenosis have a smaller ascending aortic size than patients with BAV untreated with statins.     

Clinical profile, prognostic implication, and response to treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic stenosis

The incidence, correlates, and prognostic implications of pulmonary hypertension (PH) are unclear in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We studied 509 patients with severe AS evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Patients were divided into groups based on pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP): group I, 161 (31.6%) with PASP <40 mm Hg; group II, 175 (34.3%) with PASP 40 to 59 mm Hg; and group III, 173 (33.9%) with PASP ≥ 60 mm Hg. Group III patients were more symptomatic and had higher creatinine levels and higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Transpulmonary gradient was >12 mm Hg in 17 patients (10.5%), 31 patients (17.7%), and 80 patients (46.2%) in groups I through III, respectively. In a median follow-up of 202 days (73 to 446) mortality rates were 35 (21.7%), 69 (39.3%), and 85 (49.1%) in groups I through III, respectively (p <0.001). Immediately after TAVI, in patients with PASP >40 mm Hg there was significant decrease in PASP (63.1 ± 16.2 to 48.8 ± 12.4 mm Hg, p <0.0001), which remained at 1 year (50.1 ± 13.1 mm Hg, p = 0.04). After surgical aortic valve replacement there was a significant immediate decrease in PASP (66.1 ± 16.3 to 44.7 ± 14.2 mm Hg, p <0.0001), which persisted at 3 to 12 months (44.8 ± 20.1 mm Hg, p <0.001). In patients who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty, PASP decreased immediately after the procedure (63.2 ± 14.8 to 51.8 ± 17.1 mm Hg, p <0.0001), yet at 3 to 12 months pressure returned to baseline levels (57.4 ± 17.0 mm Hg, p = 0.29). In conclusion, patients with severe AS have a high prevalence of PH, and in patients with severe AS increased PASP is associated with increased mortality. Surgical aortic valve replacement and TAVI are effective treatments for these patients and result in a significant PASP decrease.     

Valve structure and survival in octogenarians having aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (+/- aortic regurgitation) with versus without coronary artery bypass grafting at a single US medical center (1993 to 2005)

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve structure on both early and late survival in octogenarians having aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) (with or without aortic regurgitation). Although a number of reports are available in octogenarians having AVR for AS, none have described aortic valve structure. Most have limited numbers of patients and few have described late results. We analyzed survival and valve structure in 196 octogenarians having AVR for AS from 1993 to 2005 at Baylor University Medical Center, including 118 (60%) with and 78 (40%) without simultaneous CABG. Sixty-day mortality, which was identical to 30-day mortality, was similar (10% and 11%) in the groups with and without simultaneous CABG. Unadjusted analysis of late survival (up to 13 year follow-up) was not affected by gender (male vs female), aortic valve structure (bicuspid vs tricuspid) or preoperative severity of the AS (transvalvular peak pressure gradient > 50 vs < or =50 mm Hg), or by performance of CABG. Of the 196 patients, 54 (28%) had a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve, and 142 (72%) had a tricuspid aortic valve. In conclusion, gender, valve structure, preoperative severity of the AS, or performance of simultaneous CABG did not effect survival in octogenarians having AVR for AS.     

Degree of reversibility of left ventricular systolic dysfunction after aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic valve stenosis

To determine whether a low preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) returns to normal late after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, 42 patients with critical aortic stenosis (valve area 0.7 cm2 or less), LV systolic dysfunction (EF 0.45 or less), angiographically normal coronary arteries, and no other significant valvular disease were studied at 10 to 84 months (mean 41 +/- 21) postoperatively. All patients survived aortic valve replacement and were discharged clinically improved. There were 4 late deaths; these patients were older (79 +/- 6 vs 64 +/- 13 years, p = 0.007) and had lower preoperative mean valve gradients (51 +/- 6 vs 68 +/- 23 mm Hg, p = 0.003) than late survivors. Of 23 survivors who returned for follow-up radionuclide angiography and Doppler echocardiography, 21 were asymptomatic. EF returned to normal (0.50 or more) in 14 patients (group 1) and remained low in 9 patients (group 2). Doppler peak prosthetic valve gradient was 24 +/- 8 mm Hg in group 1 and 25 +/- 10 mm Hg in group 2 (difference not significant). Six of the 9 patients in group 2 underwent early postoperative radionuclide imaging, and LVEF was normal in 4 (0.65 +/- 0.14 early vs 0.41 +/- 0.06 late, p = 0.02). Of 77 preoperative and intraoperative variables analyzed, only paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (0 of 14 vs 4 of 9, p = 0.01) distinguished group 1 from group 2. Thus, LVEF does not always normalize after aortic valve replacement for AS, implying impaired myocardial contractility.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relation of aortic arch complex plaques to risk of cerebral infarction in patients with aortic stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) and systemic atherosclerosis have been shown to be closely related. We evaluated the prevalence of aortic arch plaques and their possible association with the risk of cerebral infarction in patients with severe AS. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 116 patients with severe AS (55 men, mean age 71 ± 7 years, mean aortic valve area 0.68 ± 0.15 cm(2)) who were scheduled for aortic valve replacement. The presence, thickness, and morphology of the aortic arch plaques were evaluated using transesophageal echocardiography. Cerebral infarcts (chronic cerebral infarction and cerebral infarction after cardiac catheterization and aortic valve replacement) were assessed in all patients. Compared to age- and gender-matched control subjects, the patients with severe AS had a significantly greater prevalence of aortic arch plaques (74% vs 41%; p <0.0001) and complex arch plaques such as large plaques (≥4 mm), ulcerated plaques, or mobile plaques (30% vs 10%; p = 0.004). Multivariate logistic analyses showed that the presence of complex arch plaques was independently associated with cerebral infarction in patients with AS after adjusting for traditional atherosclerotic risk factors and coronary artery disease (odds ratio 8.46, 95% confidence interval 2.38 to 30.12; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the results from the present study showed that there is a greater prevalence of aortic arch plaques in patients with AS and that the presence of complex plaques is independently associated with cerebral infarction in these patients. Therefore, the identification of complex arch plaques using transesophageal echocardiography is important for risk stratification of cerebrovascular events in patients with severe AS.     

Surgery for aortic stenosis in octogenarians: influence of coronary disease and other comorbidities on hospital mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Increasing life expectancy in industrialized countries and the high incidence of aortic stenosis (AS) in higher-age groups have led to wider indications for surgery in the elderly. The study aim was to re analyze operative risk factors, considering especially coronary status, for better patient selection and decreased risk. METHODS: Between 1978 and 2003, 771 patients (319 men, 452 women) aged > or =80 years (mean 82.9 years) underwent valve replacement (bioprosthesis in 760 cases; 99%) for AS. Preoperative coronary angiography (performed in 617 cases; 80%) found significant lesions in 203 patients (33%) of either single- (n = 122), double- (n = 54) or triple- (n = 27) vessel disease. In total, 112 patients underwent associated coronary revascularization (one graft in 80 patients, and two or three grafts in 32). RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 10.1% (n = 78 patients). Predictive factors of mortality were left and right heart failure (p <0.001), emergency surgery (p <0.001), NYHA class IV (p <0.01), renal insufficiency (p <0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% (p <0.01), atrioventricular block (p <0.01) and associated mitral valve replacement (p <0.01). Although no statistical difference was found, operative mortality increased according to the coronary status: no significant lesion 8.2%, single-vessel disease 11.5%, two-vessel 11.1%, and three-vessel 18.5%. If operative mortality is not influenced by single-vessel revascularization (10%), it becomes higher in multiple bypasses (18.8%). CONCLUSION: Surgery remains the only treatment for AS. Since analysis failed to identify any specific high-risk groups, indications should remain broad and decisions made on an individual patient basis. A combined strategy associating angioplasty and surgery should be evaluated in order to improve the preoperative coronary status and reduce operative risk.     

Preoperative left ventricular wall stress, ejection fraction, and aortic valve gradient as prognostic indicators in aortic valve stenosis

Patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may dramatically improve after aortic valve replacement, but operative risk is high. In an earlier study, all patients with low preoperative wall stress and low ejection fraction, or with low aortic valve gradient, died or had persistent heart failure after operation. Because wall stress is difficult to calculate, we reassessed its effect and the effect of other preoperative characteristics on outcome in 66 consecutive catheterization patients with predominant aortic stenosis referred for valve replacement. Despite ejection fraction that was inordinately low compared with afterloading wall stress in nine patients, seven patients improved with surgery. All three patients with ejection fraction less than 20% improved after surgery. Two of three patients with mean aortic valve gradients of less than 30 mm Hg improved. Mortality was 33% in patients with mean gradient less than 30 mm Hg and 19% with mean gradient less than 50 mm Hg. In the 54 patients with calculated aortic valve areas of less than or equal to 0.8 cm2, 1 (2%) had continuing heart failure, while 6 of 12 (50%, P less than .01) patients with aortic valve areas of 0.9-1.2 cm2 had continued symptoms of or died of heart failure. Patients who died or failed to improve after operation were older (71 +/- 9 years) than those who improved (65 +/- 9 years, P = .02). We conclude that wall stress calculations do not predict which patients with aortic stenosis will benefit from aortic valve replacement and that poor left ventricular function and low mean aortic valve gradient do not absolutely preclude operation. On the other hand, low gradient, non-critical valve area, and advanced age are all relative contraindications to aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis.     

Are initial valve operations in octogenarians still high-risk in the current era?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The average age of cardiac patients continues to increase. As more octogenarians undergo surgery during the current era, the outcome of valve surgery was investigated to determine the operative risk in these patients. METHODS: Among 350 patients aged > or = 80 years who had initial surgery between 1998 and 2006, a total of 188 (105 females, 83 males) underwent valve surgery. A prospective analysis was conducted of the collected data. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 82 years (IQR: 81-84 years), and over half of them presented with severe symptoms (NYHA class III/IV; n = 96), controlled heart failure (n = 108), hypertension (n = 101) and coronary artery disease (n = 108). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 89 cases (47%). Perioperative hemodynamic support with inotropes was common (47%). Hospital death after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 89) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n = 10) occurred in four patients (4.5%, median additive EuroSCORE 9.0%) and one patient (10%, median additive EuroSCORE 9.8%), respectively. Concomitant CABG led to a doubling of the operative mortality which, for AVR, declined from 5.4% to 3.8% during the latter half of the study period. The median length of stay was 24 h (IQR 21-44 h) in the intensive care unit, and 10 days (IQR 7-14 days) postoperatively. The risk factors for operative mortality were urgent/emergent surgery (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.12-9.58, p = 0.03), preoperative gastrointestinal disease (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.12-8.9, p = 0.03), left ventricular ejection fraction <0.30 (HR 4.37, 95% CI 1.29-14.82, p = 0.02), and ischemic time (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.004-1.07, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Elective isolated AVR can be performed with modest operative risk in octogenarians with good left ventricular systolic function. Additional procedures impose long ischemic times and increase the operative risk, as does MVR. Strategies to minimize the complexity and extent of surgery should benefit these patients.