Differential effects of donor‐specific HLA antibodies in living versus deceased donor transplant

The presence of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with increased risk of graft failure after kidney transplant. We hypothesized that DSAs against HLA class I, class II, or both classes indicate a different risk for graft loss between deceased and living donor transplant. In this study, we investigated the impact of pretransplant DSAs, by using single antigen bead assays, on long‐term graft survival in 3237 deceased and 1487 living donor kidney transplants with a negative complement‐dependent crossmatch. In living donor transplants, we found a limited effect on graft survival of DSAs against class I or II antigens after transplant. Class I and II DSAs combined resulted in decreased 10‐year graft survival (84% to 75%). In contrast, after deceased donor transplant, patients with class I or class II DSAs had a 10‐year graft survival of 59% and 60%, respectively, both significantly lower than the survival for patients without DSAs (76%). The combination of class I and II DSAs resulted in a 10‐year survival of 54% in deceased donor transplants. In conclusion, class I and II DSAs are a clear risk factor for graft loss in deceased donor transplants, while in living donor transplants, class I and II DSAs seem to be associated with an increased risk for graft failure, but this could not be assessed due to their low prevalence.     

Effect of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin on anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates

Limited data exist on the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on anti-HLA antibodies as determined by solid-phase assays. We reviewed our experience treating sensitized wait-listed kidney transplant recipients with IVIg as a method for desensitization and report our results utilizing Luminex single antigen (LSA) bead assay to quantify antibody reactivity (MFI). Fifteen patients with a cPRA > 40% received 2 g/kg IVIg per month for four months or until transplanted. LSA testing was performed before and after IVIg. Median MFI for anti-class I antibodies fell in 11 (73%) and increased in 4 (27%) patients after IVIg. Similar significant changes in MFI for anti-class II antibodies were observed in 10 patients (66%). Administration of IVIg was associated with a modest decrease in reactivity to both class I and II HLA antigens (median MFI change 493 and 1110, respectively; p < 0.0001) but did not significantly alter mean cPRA (85% before IVIg vs. 80% after IVIg; p = 0.1). Our data suggest a smaller effect of IVIg on HLA antibody reactivity than previously described, leading us to question how best to measure the efficacy of a desensitization protocol in current practice.     

Post-transplant de novo non donor-specific HLA antibodies are not associated with poor graft outcome in non-sensitized pediatric recipients of kidney transplantation

While de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSAs) have a detrimental impact on kidney graft outcome, the clinical significance of de novo non donor-specific antibodies (dnNDSAs) is more controversial. We retrospectively evaluated for Ab development and characteristics of dnNDSAs serially collected post-transplant sera and, when available, graft biopsy eluates, from 144 non-sensitized, primary pediatric kidney recipients, consecutively transplanted at a single center between 2003 and 2017, using HLA class I and class II single-antigen flow-bead assays (SAB). The results were compared with clinical-pathologic data from HLA antibody negative and HLA dnDSA-positive patients.Forty-five out of 144 patients developed dnNDSAs (31%). Among the dnNDSA-positive patients, 86% displayed one or more class I/II antibodies recognizing antigens included in the CREG/shared epitope groups that also comprise the mismatched donor HLA antigens. Despite potential pathogenicity, as suggested by their occasional presence within the graft, dnNDSAs displayed significantly lower MFI, and limited complement binding and graft homing properties, when compared with dnDSAs. In parallel, the graft survival probability was significantly lower in patients with dnDSA than in those with dnNDSA or without HLA antibodies (p < 0.005). Indeed, the dnNDSA-positive patients remaining dnDSA-negative throughout the posttransplant period did not develop clinical antibody mediated rejection and graft loss, and maintained good graft function at a median follow-up of 9 years. The biological characteristics of dnNDSAs may account for the low graft damaging capability when compared to dnDSAs.     

Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigens and Donor Specific Antibodies in Long-Term Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

PurposeHLA antibodies have been shown to be associated with late graft loss. In this study, we defined the incidence and profiles of anti-HLA antibodies and their impact on graft outcome in long-term kidney recipients.MethodsThe sera of 118 kidney transplant recipients were screened for anti-HLA antibody presence. The antigen specificity of the detected HLA class I and class II antibodies was identified using a Luminex assay (Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, United States). Presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in individuals with anti-HLA antibodies using the Luminex method.ResultsAnti-HLA class I and/or class II antibodies were detected in serum of 16.1% of the kidney transplant patients. The antibodies were directed against HLA class I antigens in 4 patients (21.1%), HLA class II antigens in 9 patients (47.4%), and both class I and class II antigens in 6 patients (31.6%). The overall prevalence of DSA was 10.2%. Anti-HLA antibodies were significantly associated with higher rate of cyclosporine use. Presence of DSA was associated with a lower rate of tacrolimus use, a higher rate of cyclosporine use, and lower donor age. Presence of anti-HLA antibodies was associated with higher acute cellular rejection and higher chronic active humoral rejection rates. Presence of DSA was associated with chronic active humoral rejection.ConclusionThe presence of either HLA antibodies or DSA significantly correlated with lower graft survival, poor transplant function, and proteinuria.     

Detection and analysis of HLA class I and class II specific alloantibodies in the sera of dialysis recipients waiting for a renal retransplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the specificities of HLA class I (-A,-B) and class II (-DR,-DQ) antibodies (Ab) detected in the sera of alloimmunized patients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation. The study group consisted of 62 dialysis patients (42 men and 20 women, mean age: 43 +/- 18 yr) on waiting list for a subsequent kidney transplant (52 for a second and 10 for a third transplant) at S. Martino Hospital Transplant Centre in Genoa/Italy, who were enrolled from 2002 to 2004 for HLA antibody screening. Complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique was used firstly to select anti-HLA class I sensitized patients; indeed sera from 50 individuals out of 62 (80.6%) were found to display persistent HLA class I PRA (panel reactive antibody) values >4% (range: 20-100). ELISA technique was subsequently adopted to analyze HLA class I Ab positive sera for the presence also of HLA class II Ab and to characterize class I and class II Ab specificities. Anti-class I immunized patients were divided in three groups according to the type of class I Ab specificities, that were classified as private, public, and multispecific. The first group included 35 patients (70% of the total number of positive patients) showing only antibodies directed against private HLA class I specificities, represented in 33 cases by those expressed by graft donors (first or second transplant). In this group anti-class I PRA% values ranged from 20% to 60%. HLA class II Ab, with an heterogeneous specificity pattern (private, public or multispecific), were present in 25 (78.1%) out of the 32 patients, whose sera were also available for this analysis. The second group comprised 12 patients (24%) who displayed antibodies directed against class I public epitopes belonging to CREGs (Cross reactive Groups) or an association of anti-private and anti-public antibodies. In this group PRA values ranged from 25% to 90%. Five patients (46.7%) were positive for HLA class II Ab, whose specificity pattern appeared also heterogeneous (private or multispecific). The third group was represented by three patients (6%) displaying multispecific antibodies with PRA values > or = 90%. No multispecific class II Ab were found in this group, where only two patients had class II Ab showing anti-private or anti-private plus public specificities. Globally, 74% of anti-class I Ab positive patients, having at least one HLA class II antigen mismatch, appeared also positive for class II Ab. These results indicate that: (i) a large proportion of patients, waiting for a kidney retransplantation, display in their sera alloantibodies specific for graft mismatched HLA class I (80.6%) and class II antigens (54.2); (ii) the immunogenic determinants, mainly involved in HLA class I and II specific Ab production, were, in a significant rate, private specificities of mismatched HLA antigens (70% for class I and 59.4% for class II), and in a lesser percentage by public (CREG) epitopes (24% for class I and 34.3% for class II). In a few patients only no HLA class I and class II Ab specificities could be determined, as they displayed multispecific antibodies (6% for class I and 6.2% for class II). These findings may have important implications to improve donor-recipient matching in dialysis recipients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation.     

Safety and Efficacy of a Steroid Avoidance Immunosuppression Regimen in Renal Transplant Patients With De Novo or Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Single-Center Study

Although interest in the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in kidney transplant rejection, graft survival, and histopathological outcomes is increasing, their impact on steroid avoidance or minimization in renal transplant populations is poorly understood. Primary outcomes of graft survival, rejection, and histopathological findings were assessed in 188 patients who received transplants between 2012 and 2015 at the Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, which follows a steroid avoidance protocol. Analyses were performed using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Cohorts included kidney transplant recipients with de novo DSAs (dnDSAs; n = 27), preformed DSAs (pfDSAs; n = 15), and no DSAs (nDSAs; n = 146). Median time to dnDSA development (classes I and II) was shorter (102 days) than in previous studies. Rejection of any type was associated with DSAs to class I HLA (P < .05) and class II HLA (P < .01) but not with graft loss. Although mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) independently showed no association with rejection, an MFI >5000 showed a trend toward more antibody-mediated rejection (P < .06), though graft loss was not independently associated. Banff chronic allograft nephropathy scores and a modified chronic injury score were increased in the dnDSA cohort at 6 months, but not at 2 years (P < .001 and P < .08, respectively). Our data suggest that dnDSAs and pfDSAs impact short-term rejection rates but do not negatively impact graft survival or histopathological outcomes at 2 years. Periodic protocol post-transplant DSA monitoring may preemptively identify patients who develop dnDSAs who are at a higher risk for rejection.     

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in needle core biopsies of renal transplants recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from needle core biopsies of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy. Two methods of screening, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry (FlowPRA) were compared. Twenty renal transplants with CAN were removed after irreversible graft failure. To assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in small samples, needle core biopsies were sampled at the same place as surgical samples and at a second cortical area. Antibodies were eluted with an acid elution kit and anti-class I and class II IgG HLA antibodies detected using ELISA and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was found to be more sensitive than ELISA for detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from renal transplants with CAN (95% vs. 75% of positive cases). Detection of anti-HLA antibodies showed good agreement between surgical samples and needle core biopsies performed at the same place for anti-class I (80% vs. 65%, r=0.724 P<0.01) and anti-class II HLA antibodies (70% vs. 55%, r=0.827 P<0.01). In addition, differences in the detection of anti-class I HLA antibodies in needle core biopsies sampled at different sites suggests that immunization to class I donor antigen could be underestimated in needle core biopsy samples. These data indicate that anti-HLA antibodies can be detected in needle core biopsies from renal transplants. Provided further evaluation is done, elution might be a complementary method to detect anti-HLA antibodies when they are bound to the transplant.     

Absence of Donor‐Specific Anti‐HLA Antibodies After ABO‐Incompatible Heart Transplantation in Infancy: Altered Immunity or Age?

Specific B-cell tolerance toward donor blood group antigens develops in infants after ABO-incompatible heart transplantation, whereas their immune response toward protein antigens such as HLA has not been investigated. We assessed de novo HLA-antibodies in 122 patients after pediatric thoracic transplantation (28 ABO-incompatible) and 36 controls. Median age at transplantation was 1.7 years (1 day to 17.8 year) and samples were collected at median 3.48 years after transplantation. Antibodies were detected against HLA-class I in 21 patients (17.2%), class II in 18 (14.8%) and against both classes in 10 (8.2%). Using single-antigen beads, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were identified in six patients (all class II, one additional class I). Patients with DSAs were significantly older at time of transplantation. In patients who had undergone pretransplant cardiac surgeries, class II antibodies were more frequent, although use of homografts or mechanical heart support had no influence. DSAs were absent in ABO-incompatible recipients and class II antibodies were significantly less frequent than in children with ABO-compatible transplants. This difference was present also when comparing only children transplanted below 2 years of age. Therefore, tolerance toward the donor blood group appears to be associated with an altered response to HLA beyond age-related effects.     

Impact of Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation on the Incidence of Donor‐Specific Anti‐HLA Antibodies

Little is known about the impact of posttransplant blood transfusion on the sensitization of anti‐HLA antibodies and the formation of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs). The aims of our study were to determine the 1‐year incidence of DSAs (assessed using a solid‐phase assay) and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant patients who had or had not received a blood transfusion during the first year after transplantation. Included were 390 non–HLA‐sensitized patients who had received an ABO‐compatible kidney transplant and had not previously or simultaneously received a nonkidney transplant. Overall, 64% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion within the first year after transplantation, most within the first month. The overall 1‐year incidence of DSAs was significantly higher in patients that had undergone transfusion (7.2% vs. 0.7% in patients with no transfusion, p < 0.0001). AMR occurred more often in the transfusion group (n = 15, 6%) compared with the nontransfusion group (n = 2, 1.4%; p = 0.04). Blood transfusion was an independent predictive factor for de novo DSA formation but not for AMR. Patients who had a transfusion and developed DSAs were more often treated with cyclosporin A (n = 10, 55.5%) rather than tacrolimus (n = 45, 19.4%; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, early posttransplant blood transfusion may increase immunological risk, especially in underimmunosuppressed patients.     

Kidney graft failure and presensitization against HLA class I and class II antigens

BACKGROUND: It is well known that kidney transplant recipients with preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies against HLA antigens have an increased graft rejection rate. However, the individual contribution of anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies to this phenomenon is poorly understood. We investigated the clinical relevance of preformed anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies on graft outcome in more than 4000 kidney recipients. METHODS: Pretransplant sera of 4136 cadaver kidney recipients from 28 transplant centers were tested in ELISA for IgG-anti-HLA class I and IgG-anti-HLA class II antibodies. The influence of antibody reactivity on graft survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty of the anti-HLA class I antibody-positive recipients had a graft survival rate at 2 years of 77+/-2%, compared with an 84+/-1% rate in 3656 anti-HLA class I antibody-negative recipients (P<0.0001), and 770 anti-HLA class II-positive recipients had a graft survival rate of 79+/-2%, compared with an 84+/-1% rate in 3366 anti-HLA class II-negative patients (P<0.0001). Importantly, good 2-year graft survival rates of 85+/-3% and 84+/-2%, respectively, were observed in 206 anti-HLA class I-positive/class II-negative and 496 anti-HLA, class I-negative/class II-positive recipients. In contrast, the 274 recipients positive for both types of antibodies showed a poor graft survival rate of 71+/-3% (P<0.0001). Among 853 patients who received a well-matched kidney (0 or 1 HLA-A+B+DR mismatch), sensitization against either class I or class II, or both, had no deleterious effect. However, in 113 class I and class II antibody-positive patients who received a kidney with > or =3 HLA-A+B+DR mismatches, the 2-year graft survival rate was only 60+/-5%. CONCLUSION: Presensitization of first kidney transplant recipients against either HLA class I or class II is of no clinical consequence, whereas sensitization against both HLA class I and class II results in increased rejection of HLA mismatched grafts.     

Flow cytometric evaluation of pregnancy-induced anti-donor immunization

Background

Living donor kidneys from spouses and children (from offspring to parents) are currently considered to be important organ sources. However, pregnancy-induced alloimmunization may provoke acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation. being flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM) we studied donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the sera of recipients planned for living kidney transplantation from their spouse or children. When the FCXM was positive, we confirmed the existence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies using flow cytometry panel-reactive antibody (flow-PRA).

Patients and Methods

Between March 2005 and November 2010, we tested 85 pretransplantation sera from renal transplant recipients for DSAs. The recipients included 37 wives (group I) and 48 husbands (group II). FCXM-positive sera were tested using a flow-PRA screening method using HLA class I and class II antigen-coated beads. The mean recipient age was 48.1 ± 9.8 (range, 28-69) years and the mean donor age was 45.1 ± 11.1 (range, 23-69 years).

Results

Among group I were 18 (48.6%) FCXM-positive cross-matches; for group II, 5 (10.4%) cases (P = .001). Sensitized patients were 37.9% FCXM-positive, whereas nonsensitized patients were 3.7% positive (P = .001). FCXM-positive patients were re-evaluated for anti-HLA antibodies using flow-PRA. Seventeen of 18 group I tests (94.4%) were FCXM-positive, whereas 3 of 5 (60%) were positive among group II.

Conclusions

We concluded that flow cytometry-based cross-match and PRA techniques can be used to detect anti-HLA antibodies using spousal or children donors for kidney transplantation.     

The clinical importance of choosing the right assay for detection of HLA-specific donor-reactive antibodies.

BACKGROUND: We found earlier that there is a close clinical correlation between the presence of histocompatibility leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I-specific donor-reactive antibodies in cross-match serum and a significantly higher frequency of early acute rejection episodes and graft loss during the first year after the transplant. METHODS: Specificity determinations of donor-reactive antibodies present in the cross-match serum before allogeneic kidney transplants were performed. In the present study, we compared the suitability and efficiency of (a) platelet absorptions, (b) blocking with anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies in the microcytotoxicity assay, and (c) donor-specific HLA antigen-coated magnetic microbeads in flow cytometric assays for the definition of clinically relevant HLA antibodies and their correlation with early acute rejections and early graft loss. RESULTS: We found that the microlymphocytoxicity test using donor splenic B lymphocytes often gave positive reactions in the absence of class I or class II antibodies; in other words, a high frequency of false positive reactions was observed. Flow cytometric tests are more sensitive than microlymphocytotoxicity, not only because they are more sensitive, but also because noncomplement-binding antibodies are detected. Platelet absorptions, which detect only reactivity against HLA class I antigens, is insufficient for use in specificity determinations of donor-reactive antibodies. We found that a positive test for HLA antibodies using paramagnetic beads coated with solubilized donor-derived HLA antigens (class I or class II) correlates with early immunological complications after a transplant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Assays to determine the specificity of donor-reactive antibodies are now available for use during an acute transplant situation. The introduction of such methods is expected to enhance graft survival and to reduce significantly the frequencies of acute rejections episodes after a transplant.     

The correlation of results of panel reactive antibody,identification, and single antigen beads in detection of anti-HLA antibodies: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine,tissue typing laboratory experience

BackgroundWe have performed a retrospective analysis of anti-HLA class I MHC and class II MHC antibodies measured using a single antigen bead (SAB) assay and a panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay.Material and methodsA group of 256 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was tested for anti-HLA antibodies in the tissue typing laboratory between 2017 and 2020. In the cohort, the serum samples of patients waiting for transplantation were tested. Both the PRA and SAB tests of these patients were analyzed using the Luminex (Immucor) method. The threshold of positivity was accepted as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) ≥1000 for PRA screening and MFI ≥750 for SAB screening.ResultsOverall, antibodies to HLA antigens were detected in 202 (78.9%) out of 256 patients in the PRA study. Antibodies against both class I/II antigens were detected only in 15.6% of these patients, whereas antibodies against only against class I HLA in 31.3% and only against class II HLA in 32.0%. By comparison, the SAB study found that 66.8% of patients were positive for HLA antigens. Furthermore, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in 52.0% of PRA-positive patients and 52.6% of SAB-positive patients. It was shown that 168 patients (83.2%) out of 202 PRA-positive patients were found to be SAB-positive. In addition, 51 patients negative in the SAB assay (94.4%) were also negative in the PRA assay. Statistical analysis established a significant correlation between the PRA and SAB positivity (p > 0.001).It was also shown that MFI ≥3000 PRA positivity for class I HLA antigens (p = 0.049) and MFI ≥5000 PRA positivity for class II antigens (p < 0.001) correlated with the SAB positivity in patients.ConclusionOur results showed the importance of both PRA and SAB assays to define the status of sensitization in patients.     

Does exposure to swine leukocyte antigens after pig‐to‐nonhuman primate xenotransplantation provoke antibodies that cross‐react with human leukocyte antigens?

BACKGROUND: A potential concern of using pig kidney xenografts for human transplantation is that antibodies produced to swine leukocyte antigens (SLA) may cross-react with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and thereby limit the scope for a subsequent human organ donor transplant. We therefore investigated whether exposure to SLA after pig-to-nonhuman primate kidney xenotransplantation gives rise to HLA cross-reactive antibodies. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 52 cynomolgus monkeys that received kidney transplants from human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pigs. Samples were collected pre-transplant and at time of autopsy (mean 20 days post-transplantation, range 1 to 53 days) and analyzed for IgG HLA class I and HLA class II specific antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against pooled purified HLA antigens. To ensure the ability of the HLA ELISA to detect cynomolgus monkey IgG binding, parallel experiments were performed to detect IgG Gal-alpha-1,3-Gal-specific antibodies known to be present in cynomolgus monkey serum. RESULTS: Analysis of both pre- and post-transplantation serum samples by ELISA demonstrated no detectable IgG antibody binding to HLA class I or class II antigens. Using the same ELISA antibody detection reagents, IgG Gal-alpha-1,3-Gal-specific antibodies were identified in 13 of 38 (34%) sera obtained before transplantation and 21 of 52 (40%) sera collected post-transplantation, confirming that the negativeHLA ELISA results were not due to a technical aspect of the assay. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that exposure to SLA following transplantation of porcine kidneys in nonhuman primates does not give rise to antibodies that cross-react with HLA.     

Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor‐specific antibody levels after belatacept‐ versus cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T‐cell crossmatch–negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)‐based, belatacept less intense (LI)‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid‐phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti‐HLA–positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept‐based and cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT. In BENEFIT, preexisting DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting DSAs in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in MFI. MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept MI‐based versus belatacept LI‐based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in BENEFIT‐EXT versus BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression decreases preexisting DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

Allelic and Epitopic Characterization of Intra–Kidney Allograft Anti‐HLA Antibodies at Allograft Nephrectomy

The reasons for the increased incidence of de novo anti–human leukocyte antibody (HLA) donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) observed after kidney allograft nephrectomy are not fully understood. One advocated mechanism suggests that at graft loss, DSAs are not detected in the serum because they are fixed on the nonfunctional transplant; removal of the kidney allows DSAs to then appear in the blood circulation. The aim of our study was to compare anti‐HLA antibodies present in the serum and in the graft at the time of an allograft nephrectomy. Using solid‐phase assays, anti‐HLA antibodies were searched for in the sera of 17 kidney transplant patients undergoing allograft nephrectomy. No anti‐HLA antibodies were detected in the graft if they were not also detected in the serum. Eleven of the 12 patients who had DSAs detected in their sera also had DSAs detected in the grafts. Epitopic analysis revealed that most anti‐HLA antibodies detected in removed grafts were directed against the donor. In summary, our data show that all anti‐HLA antibodies that were detected in grafts were also detected in the sera. These intragraft anti‐HLA antibodies are mostly directed against the donor at an epitopic level but not always at an antigenic level.     

Hyperacute and acute kidney graft rejection due to antibodies against B cells.

Because of the perception of its uncertain clinical significance, the B cell crossmatch is not universally performed before renal transplantation. Even though sporadic cases of hyperacute rejection associated with B cell antibodies have been reported, doubts remain in light of other studies suggesting no effect on graft survival. This report describes 4 cases of graft rejection (3 hyperacute and 1 acute) that occurred in patients with anti-B-cell antibodies specific against donor HLA-DR or DQ antigens. Absence of anti-donor class I antibodies was confirmed in all cases by 2-color flow cytometry. Strong evidence for an antibody-mediated mechanism was found in one patient with anti-class I and anti-class II antibodies in serum transplanted with a class II mismatched kidney. In this case, only anti-class II antibodies were recovered in the eluate of the nephrectomy specimen. These four cases were compiled from three different institutions over a four-year period, which confirms the infrequent occurrence of these events. While anti-class II antibodies may not always be detrimental for graft survival, these results also confirm that they have the potential to cause hyperacute or acute graft loss. We conclude that the information provided by the B cell crossmatch should be available at the time that a decision to proceed with a renal transplant is made.     

Clinical relevance of low levels of preformed alloantibodies detected by flow cytometry in the first year post-kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of transplants performed with a false-negative cytotoxicity cross-match and to analyze the clinical relevance of alloantibodies (Ab) detected only by flow cytometry (flow). METHODS: We studied 66 patients undergoing kidney transplantation from a cadaveric donor. All patients had a simultaneous negative T+AHG+DTT and B+DTT. Pretransplant sera were retrospectively analyzed by flow cytometry according to an Emory University protocol: (1) T+ and B-: Ab anti-class I; (2) T- and B+: anti-class II; (3) T+B+: anti-class I + II. Chi-square, Fisher exact, Student t test, and Kaplan Meier analyses were employed with significance assigned at P < or = .05. RESULTS: The overall incidence of false-negative cytotoxicity was 33.3% (22/66), namely, 6.1% (n = 4) anti-class I; 9.1% (n = 6) anti-class II; and 18.2% (n = 12) anti-class I + II. Primary nonfunctioning grafts occurred in 6.8% (3/44) and 13.6% (3/22) negative and positive flow patients (two anti-class I + II and one class II; P = .39). The incidence of graft loss in the first year was respectively, 13.6% (6/44) and 18.2% (4/22; two anti-class II and two anti-class I + II; P = .72). Compared to flow-negative grafts, creatinine levels were significantly higher among flow-positive patients at 8 and 12 weeks. One-year graft survivals were 86.4% among negative versus 81.8% for the positive group (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that 33% of kidney transplant recipients had low levels of alloantibodies detected only by flow. This single factor was associated with the worst graft function in the first trimester with a suggestion of a higher risk for non-functioning graft.     

Soluble CD30 and HLA antibodies as potential risk factors for kidney transplant rejection

Recent literary data suggest that high pre- and post-transplant serum levels of the soluble CD30 (sCD30) molecule may be a risk factor for acute rejection and worse prognosis of the transplanted kidney. The aim of our study was to correlate the concentrations of sCD30 and the presence of HLA antibodies as defined by flow cytometry and ELISA with the clinical course and graft prognosis after transplantation. One hundred and seventeen kidney transplant patients were included into the study. The incidence of rejection episodes, graft function and graft survival for up to 1 year post-transplant were evaluated. Soluble CD30 levels before transplantation were virtually the same in patients who experienced rejection and in non-rejecting patients. In both patient groups, a significant decrease of sCD30 was detected 2 weeks after transplantation (104.4 U/ml before vs. 37.0 U/ml post-transplant, P < 0.001). However, there was a substantial difference in the level of decrease of sCD30 between rejecting and non-rejecting patients. Patients without rejection had lower sCD30 values (31.2 U/ml post-transplant) compared to patients who experienced rejection episodes (62.9 U/ml), P < 0.04. Multifactorial analysis showed that antibodies to HLA class II antigens and elevated concentrations of sCD30 shortly after transplantation were associated with increased risk for acute rejection in the first post-transplant year. Measurement of soluble CD30 after transplantation, taken into consideration with the presence of HLA class II antibodies, might be helpful for evaluating the potential risk for acute rejection.