Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Long-Term Results of Breast-Conserving Therapy

Background: The role of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in the management of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is controversial because of reported high recurrence rates. We reviewed our experience to determine whether the rate and pattern of locoregional recurrence after BCT were similar in patients with DCIS and patients with early-stage (T1) invasive breast tumors and whether local recurrence affected survival.Methods: Between 1973 and 1994, 87 patients with DCIS alone, 22 patients with DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-M), and 646 patients with invasive breast cancer 2 cm or smaller in diameter were treated with BCT (wide local excision with radiotherapy) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up times were 11 years for patients with DCIS alone, 12 years for patients with DCIS-M, and 8 years for patients with invasive breast cancer.Results: Eleven (13%) of 87 patients with DCIS and 5 (23%) of 22 patients with DCIS-M had developed locoregional recurrences at follow-up. Two patients with DCIS with locoregional recurrence died of breast cancer. Of the 646 patients with invasive breast cancer, 56 (9%) had a locoregional recurrence, and 16 (2%) died of breast cancer. The median time to locoregional recurrence was significantly longer in patients with DCIS or DCIS-M (9–10 years) than patients with invasive tumors (5 years).Conclusions: DCIS is a favorable disease with an excellent long-term survival. The locoregional recurrence rate in patients with DCIS treated with BCT is similar to that in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with BCT, but time to locoregional recurrence is significantly longer in patients with DCIS. In patients with DCIS treated with BCT, intense surveillance for locoregional recurrence needs to be maintained for the patients lifetime.Presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 16–19, 2000.     

Twenty-Year Outcomes after Breast-Conserving Surgery and Definitive Radiotherapy for Mammographically Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Background

Management of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at a single institution was reviewed to determine long-term clinical outcomes after treatment with breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

Methods

Data from all patient-cases with DCIS who received BCT between 1980 and 1993 were reviewed. Patient demographics and pathologic factors were analyzed for their effect on outcomes, including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and survival. BCT included breast-conserving surgery followed by external-beam radiotherapy to the whole breast, with 86?% of patients receiving a lumpectomy cavity boost. The median dose to the whole breast was 50 Gy and 60.4?Gy to the lumpectomy cavity.

Results

A total of 129 cases were evaluated; the median follow-up was 19.3?years. Twenty-one patients developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), 76.2?% of which were invasive (n?=?16). Fourteen recurrences (66?%) were within the same breast quadrant (true recurrence), while an additional 7 cases developed an IBTR elsewhere in the breast. True recurrences were more prevalent in women <45?years of age (20?%/24?% vs. 5.1?%/8?%) at 10 and 20?years (p?=?0.02). The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year actuarial rates of IBTR for this cohort were 8.7, 10.4, 12.1, and 16.3?% (IBTR), while overall survival at 5, 10, and 20 years was 97.6, 96.8, and 96.8?%, respectively.

Conclusions

Mammographically detected DCIS remains a clinically distinct subset of noninvasive breast cancer. With 20?year follow-up, local control and overall survival are excellent after BCT.     

Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been evolving and the majority of women are now being treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (i.e. breast conservation therapy [BCT]). Controversies still exist regarding the histologic features and margin status that are associated with local recurrence. The goal of this study was to review our institution's experience in patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCT to determine pathologic features that can predict local recurrence, with particular emphasis on the final surgical margin status. We analyzed 103 consecutive patients with DCIS who were treated with BCT between 1986 and 2000. The slides were reviewed to determine the final margin status, type of DCIS, size of DCIS, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis and calcification, and volume of excised specimen. Margins were considered positive when DCIS touched or was transected at an inked margin. Negative margins were further categorized as close (less than 1 mm), 1--5 mm, and more than 5 mm. The size of the DCIS was determined based on either the maximal dimension on a slide or from the number of consecutive slides containing DCIS. Morphology and immunohistochemical profiles of the recurrent DCIS cases were compared with original DCIS. All patients were treated uniformly with external beam radiation therapy to the entire breast (median dose 46 Gy) with a boost to the tumor bed (median dose 14 Gy). The median follow-up was 63 months (range 7--191 months). The actuarial 5-year local control rate was 89%. The median time to local recurrence was 55 months. There were 13 local recurrences, of which 9 recurred as pure DCIS and 4 as invasive ductal carcinomas. Univariate analysis showed a significant association with local recurrence for positive margin (p=0.008), high nuclear grade (p=0.02), and young age at diagnosis (p=0.03). If margins were negative, the 5-year local control was 93%, as compared to 69% if margins were positive. A multivariate analysis showed that early age at diagnosis, positive margin status, and high nuclear grade were independently associated with local recurrence. The morphology and immunohistochemical stains of all nine recurrent DCIS were similar to those of the original DCIS. Breast conservation can be achieved with excellent local control by obtaining microscopically negative margins as strictly defined by DCIS not touching the inked surgical margins, and postoperative radiation that includes boost therapy to the tumor bed.     

Local control in young women with early-stage breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation

ObjectiveTo compare local control (LC) in young women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with hypofractionated (HF) whole breast irradiation (WBI) vs conventional fractionation (CF) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).Materials and MethodsWomen <50 years with pT1-2N0 BC following BCS treated with WBI, CF (50Gy/25 fractions) or HF (42.4Gy/16 fractions) followed by a tumor bed boost (10–16Gy/5–8 fractions) from 2009 to 2013 were identified from an institutional database. Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range 0.3–8.4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 5-year LC. Logistic regression identified factors associated with receipt of CF vs HF WBI.ResultsOf 270 eligible women, 227 (84%) were treated with HF and 43 (16%) with CF WBI. A tumor bed boost of 10 Gy/5 fractions was given in 97% of patients, 53% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 94% (225/239) with estrogen-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Median age was 45 years (range 30–49) in HF and 40 years (range 19–49) in the CF group. The 5-year LC rate was 99.3% (95% CI 97.9–100%, p = 0.495) in the HF and 97.5% (95% CI 92.8–100%) in the CF group. On univariate analysis, age ≤ 40 years or triple negative BC was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving HF WBI. Only age remained significant on multivariate analysis [OR 2.82 (95% CI 1.45–5.48, p = 0.002)].ConclusionsHF WBI was associated with excellent LC rates in this study cohort, comparable to CF WBI. However, CF WBI was more likely to be recommended to women <40 years.     

Phyllodes tumors of the breast: Adjuvant radiation therapy revisited

BackgroundPhyllodes tumors (PT) are rare entity and surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. No standard of care exists regarding adjuvant treatment especially radiation therapy (RT).Patients and methodsWe analyzed all patients with non-metastatic, resected phyllodes tumors who presented to our institution from January 2005 through December 2019. Primary study endpoints included local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOne hundred and eight patients were analyzed (patients with incomplete treatment and follow up data were excluded). Fifty patients had benign phyllodes, 26 patients had borderline and 32 patients had malignant phyllodes. In the benign group, no significant difference in LRFS was observed between patients who received adjuvant RT (n = 3) and those who did not (5-year LRFS 100% vs. 85% respectively, p = 0.49). The 5 year OS for patients who received RT was 60% vs. 89% for those who did not (p 0.40). In the borderline/malignant group, adjuvant RT significantly improved five year LRFS (90% in the RT group vs. 42% in the no RT group, p = 0.005). The 5 year LRFS in patients treated with margin negative breast conserving surgery and RT was 100% vs. 34.3% in patients who did not receive RT (p 0.022). Patients treated with mastectomy and RT had a 5 year LRFS of 100% vs. 83% for patients who did not receive RT (p 0.24). On multivariate analysis, radiation therapy was independently associated with decreased hazard of local failure (HR 0.21, CI 0.05–0.89, p = 0.03). No difference in OS was found between the RT and no RT groups (5-year OS was 52% vs. 45% respectively, p 0.54).ConclusionThe results of the current study confirm the excellent prognosis of benign phyllodes tumors; warranting no further adjuvant treatment after margin-negative surgical resection. For patients with borderline/malignant phyllodes tumors, adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved LRFS after margin negative wide local excision; however, patients treated with mastectomy did not attain the same benefit from adjuvant irradiation.     

Gemcitabine based trimodality treatment in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: May neutrophil lymphocyte and platelet lymphocyte ratios predict outcomes?

PurposeCisplatin based chemoradiation has been commonly used as a definitive treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The aim of the current study is to evaluate oncologic results and toxicity profile of bladder-sparing treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and gemcitabine chemotherapy (ChT) in patients with MIBC.Materials and MethodsBetween April 2005 and November 2018 44 patients with nonmetastatic and N0 MIBC were treated with transurethral resection of bladder (TURB), EBRT and concurrent gemcitabine. All patients were staged using thorax-abdomen-pelvic CT and pelvic MRI. EBRT was delivered using 3D conformal technique or intensity modulated radiotherapy. Patients received 50 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions to full bladder followed by a boost dose of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to empty bladder with weekly concurrent gemcitabine of 50 mg/m². All patients were evaluated for age, gender, smoking status, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at diagnosis, presence of hydroureteronephrosis (HUN), preoperative tumor size, tumor multifocality, presence of CIS, clinical tumor stage. Acute/late genitourinary (GUS) and gastrointestinal (GIS) toxicity, recurrence status, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21.0. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated to describe CSS and OS. The effect of different parameters on survival was investigated using the log rank test.ResultsMedian age of the patients was 72 years (interquartile [IQR]; 66–80). The median tumor size was 30 mm (IQR, 15–59 mm). Thirty-two (77%) patients had T2, 6 (14%) patients had T3, and 4 (9%) patients had T4a disease. Median NLR was 2.6 (IQR, 1.7–3.8) and median PLR was 126.47 (IQR, 77.4–184.8). Median follow-up time was 21 months (range, 6–153 months). At the first TURB performed 6 weeks after CRT, complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progression was detected in 37 (84%), 3 (7%), 1 (2%), and 3 (7%) patients, respectively. One- and 2-year OS, CSS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were 86% and 64%; 88% and 66%; 65% and 44%; 68% and 48%, respectively. In univariate analysis; prognostic factors were age and presence of HUN for OS and DMFS; age, HUN, presence of CIS, NLR, and PLR for DSS; HUN, NLR, and PLR for LRFS, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the independent predictor was the presence of HUN for OS, LRFS, and DMFS; NLR for DSS; PLR for LRFS and age for DMSF. For a subgroup of 17 patients with complete TURB and no CIS and HUN symptoms, 2-year OS, DSS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were 88%, 88%, 72%, and 79%, respectively. The treatment was well-tolerated and all patients completed the planned EBRT and ChT. No acute or late ≥ grade 3 toxicity was observed. Grade II acute GIS toxicity was detected in 3 (7%) patients and grade II acute GUS toxicity was detected in 9 (21%) patients, respectively. Grade II late GUS toxicity was observed in 2 (5%) patients.ConclusionGemcitabine based trimodality treatment is well-tolerated with similar oncologic outcomes reported in the literature. Older age, presence of CIS and high NLR and PLR values seem to deteriorate DSS.     

Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed their institution's experience treating mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine 10-year rates of local control and survival, patterns of failure, and factors associated with outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: From January 1980 to December 1993, 177 breasts in 172 patients were treated with BCT for mammographically detected DCIS of the breast at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. METHODS: All patients underwent an excisional biopsy, and 65% were reexcised. Thirty-one breasts (18%) were treated with excision alone, whereas 146 breasts (82%) received postoperative radiation therapy (RT). All patients undergoing RT received whole-breast irradiation to a median dose of 50.0 Gy. One hundred thirty-six (93%) received a boost to the tumor bed for a median total dose of 60.4 Gy. Median follow-up was 5.9 years for the lumpectomy alone group and 7.2 years for the lumpectomy + RT group. RESULTS: In the entire population, 15 patients had an ipsilateral breast recurrence. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence were 7.8% and 7.8% for lumpectomy alone and 8.0% and 9.2% for lumpectomy + RT, respectively. Eleven of the 15 recurrences developed within or immediately adjacent to the lumpectomy cavity and were designated as true recurrences or marginal misses (TMM). Four recurred elsewhere in the breast. Eleven of the 15 recurrences were invasive, whereas 4 were pure DCIS. Only one patient died of disease, yielding 5- and 10-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates of 100% and 99.2%, respectively. Eleven patients were diagnosed with subsequent contralateral breast cancer, yielding 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 5.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with ipsilateral breast failure or TR/MM. No factors were significantly associated with ipsilateral breast failure. In the entire population, the omission of RT and younger age at diagnosis were significantly associated with TR/MM. Patients younger than 45 years at diagnosis had a significantly higher rate of TR/MM in both the lumpectomy + RT and lumpectomy alone groups. None of the 37 patients who received a postexcisional mammogram had an ipsilateral breast failure versus 15 in the patients who did not receive a postexcisional mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast appear to have excellent 100-year rates of local control and overall survival when treated with BCT. These results suggest that the use of RT reduces the risk of local recurrence and that patients diagnosed at a younger age have a higher rate of local recurrence with or without the use of postoperative RT.     

Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases

IntroductionThe conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS).MethodsWe sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided.ResultsThe median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%.ConclusionStandardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.     

Adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not improve outcomes in T1-2N1 breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: A propensity score matching analysis of BIG02/98 and BCIRG005 trials

AimTo determine whether the addition of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to whole-breast irradiation (WBI) would improve outcomes over WBI alone in T1-2N1 breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant systematic therapy.MethodsData were obtained from two randomized controlled trials (NCT00174655 and NCT00312208). Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to investigate predictors for overall survival and disease-free survival. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to eliminate selection bias.ResultsWith median follow-up 80 months (range: 3–155 months), the 5-year local regional recurrence in the WBI group was 2% vs. 5% (p = 0.28) in the WBI + supraclavicular radiotherapy, and the rate of 5-year distant metastasis in the WBI group was 7% vs. 13% in the WBI + supraclavicular radiotherapy (p = 0.0748); In addition, the 5-year local regional recurrence in the WBI group was 3% vs. 9% (p = 0.19) in the WBI + internal mammary irradiation (IMI); However, the rate of 5-year distant metastasis in the in the WBI group was significantly lower than that in the WBI + IMI (8% vs. 24%, p = 0.036). After PSM, cox-regression analysis indicated that neither RNI nor IMI in combination with WBI in T1-2N1 breast cancer was associated with an improved overall survival and disease-free survival when compared to WBI alone.ConclusionThe addition of RNI to WBI in T1-2N1 breast cancer after BCS and adjuvant systematic therapy did not improve outcomes in comparison with WBI alone. Further studies are still needed to identify patients who would most benefit from RNI in this patient population.     

Local Recurrence and Survival Among Black Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Breast-Conservation Therapy or Mastectomy

Background: Black women with breast cancer have significantly worse survival rates and receive diagnoses at relatively younger ages, compared with white patients with breast cancer, in the United States. Young age at diagnosis has been associated with increased risk for local recurrence (LR) after breast-conservation therapy (BCT). The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of age and BCT on LR and survival rates among black patients with breast cancer.Methods: The records for 363 black women treated for breast cancer (excluding stage IV disease) at a comprehensive cancer center were reviewed.Results: Fifty-eight percent of patients (n = 211) had tumors 5 cm in diameter. Forty-two of these patients (19.9%) received BCT; the LR rate for this group was 9.8%. A total of 168 patients (79.6%) underwent mastectomy; the LR rate for this group was 8.9%. Data on the primary operation were unavailable for one patient. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for patients treated with BCT and those treated with mastectomy (88% and 73%, respectively). LR was associated with significant decreases in 5-year overall survival rates for both the BCT group (67% vs. 95%, P < .01) and the mastectomy group (43% vs. 76%, P < .01). LR and 5-year diseasespecific survival rates were similar for patients <50 years of age and patients 50 years of age, regardless of treatment.Conclusions: LR and survival rates are not compromised by the use of BCT among black American patients. LR is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer death, regardless of treatment type. Younger age at diagnosis was not associated with an increased rate of LR after BCT in this series.     

Outcomes After Breast Conservation Treatment with Radiation in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Prior Nonbreast Malignancy

Abstract:  Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is controversial, as not all patients progress to invasive carcinoma. This report analyzes the outcomes after breast conservation treatment (BCT) with radiation in patients with DCIS following prior malignancy at another anatomic site. The study cohort was comprised of 14 women with DCIS who were treated between 1978 and 2003. The median age at diagnosis of DCIS was 54 years (mean 56; range 37–78) and for the prior nonbreast malignancy was 44 years (mean 47; range 27–76). All patients underwent breast conservation surgery followed by whole breast radiation and tumor bed boost. The median and mean follow-up times after treatment of DCIS were 8.0 and 9.1 years, respectively (range 2–18). The median and mean interval period between the prior malignancy and DCIS was 6.0 and 8.2 years, respectively (range 1–30). There was one (7%) local failure, two (14%) contralateral breast cancers, and one (7%) death from breast cancer that occurred 7 years after BCT following contralateral invasive breast cancer. In this cohort of 14 patients treated for DCIS of the breast after a prior nonbreast malignancy, treatment for DCIS resulted in a high rate of local control and should be considered for curative intent.     

Predictors of oncologic outcome in patients with and without flap reconstruction after extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities or trunk often require plastic reconstructive transfer of vital tissue for wound closure after resection. Literature on the oncologic outcome of patients receiving flap closure in comparison with patients receiving primary wound closure is very limited.MethodsPatients who underwent resection of a primary extremity or truncal STS without dissemination at our institution between January 2000 until December 2015 were eligible for the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on type of soft tissue closure (primary or flap) while patients receiving skin grafting were excluded. Characteristics, oncologic outcome and prognostic factors of both groups were compared.Results781 patients could be included, of these 200 had received flap closure and 581 primary wound closure. Tumors receiving flap closure were significantly smaller but were located in distal extremities and showed a trend towards prior neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Incidence of wound and general complications was similar in both groups. 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS, 71% vs. 69%) and 5-year disease specific survival (DSS, 84% vs. 88%) did not differ significantly between patients with primary closure and flap closure. Most important predictors in both groups were tumor size and grading with no major differences in analysis of predictors for both endpoints.ConclusionPlastic reconstructive surgery plays an important role in limb-conserving STS treatment. Complication rates of patients with flap coverage are not higher than of patients with primary wound closure and oncologic outcome is similar with no major differences in predictors of LRFS and DSS.     

Post-operative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast – A systematic review of the randomised trials

AimTo summarise the results of randomised trials testing the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); to determine whether there are subsets of women with DCIS who do not benefit from RT; and to determine what the balance may be between reduction in risk of recurrence and long-term toxicity.MethodsWe performed a systematic review to resolve these questions, using standard Cochrane methodology to identify, select and appraise relevant randomised trials.ResultsFour randomised controlled trials involving 3925 women were identified. All were high quality with minimal risk of bias. Analysis confirmed a statistically significant benefit from the addition of radiotherapy on all ipsilateral breast events (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.41–0.58, p < 0.00001). All subgroups analysed (margin status, age and grade) benefited from the addition of radiotherapy. Nine women require treatment with radiotherapy to prevent one ipsilateral breast recurrence (NNT = 9). Deaths due to vascular disease, pulmonary toxicity and second cancers were low and not significantly higher for women who received radiotherapy.Concluding statementRadiotherapy was beneficial in all clinically relevant subgroups. Longer follow-up is required to detect any long-term toxicity from use of radiotherapy. To date, no increase in toxicity has been identified.     

Time trends and inter-hospital variation in treatment and axillary staging of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the era of screening in Southern Netherlands

BackgroundTo examine variation in time and place in axillary staging and treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.MethodsTrends in patients with DCIS recorded in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry diagnosed in 1991–2010 (n = 2449) were examined.ResultsThe use of breast conserving surgery (BCS) went from 17% to 67% in 1991–2010 and administration of radiotherapy after BCS increased to 89%. Axillary lymph node dissection decreased to almost 0%, while sentinel node biopsy was performed in 65% of patients in 2010. The proportion who underwent BCS varied between hospitals from 49% to 80%; the proportion without axillary staging ranged from 21% to 60%. Patients with screen-detected DCIS were more likely to receive BCS.ConclusionThere was considerable variation in the use of BCS, radiotherapy, and axillary staging of DCIS over time and between hospitals. Patients with DCIS were more likely to be treated with BCS if their disease was detected by screening.     

Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast

Background: Current mammographic technology has resulted in increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is necessary to assess which patients presenting with DCIS are good candidates for breast conservation and which of these patients should receive adjuvant radiation. Methods: We accrued clinical data for 124 patients with a primary diagnosis of DCIS from 1979 through 1994. Primary therapy was a mastectomy for 18 patients, and a lumpectomy for 106 patients. Only 18 of the latter group of patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. For the 88 lumpectomy-alone patients (median follow-up, 5.2 years), we evaluated the effects of clinical (age and initial presentation) and pathologic (nuclear grade, architecture, parenchymal involvement, calcifications, and measured margins) factors on recurrence of DCIS or the development of invasive breast cancer. Results: Patients who underwent lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (median follow-up, 5.0 years) were significantly more likely to have recurrence of DCIS (P=.05) than those who underwent mastectomy (median follow-up, 6.7 years): 18% (19/106) versus 0% (0/18), respectively; lumpectomy-alone patients experienced a 19% (17/88) rate of DCIS recurrence. All recurrent DCIS was ipsilateral. For lumpectomy-alone patients, the factors associated with ipsilateral recurrence of DCIS were extent of involvement of the parenchyma (P=.01, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate) and initial presentation (P=.05, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate). Eleven lumpectomy-alone patients developed invasive breast cancer (6 ipsilateral, 5 contralateral); none of the 18 lumpectomy patients who received adjuvant radiation developed invasive disease. None of the factors investigated, including primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, were associated with a significant effect on the development of invasive disease. Conclusions: Longer follow-up is required to determine if the benefits of either mastectomy or radiotherapy following lumpectomy persist. There is a suggestion that patients under 40 years of age or women who present with nipple discharge might be considered for either adjuvant radiotherapy following lumpectomy or a simple mastectomy.     

Selective use of whole breast radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer and DCIS

BackgroundRadiotherapy following breast conservation is routine in the treatment of invasive breast cancer and is commonly used in ductal carcinoma in situ to decrease local recurrence. However, adjuvant breast radiotherapy has significant short and longer-term side effects and consumes substantial health care resources. We aimed to review the randomised controlled trials and attempted to identify clinico-pathological factors and molecular markers associated with the risk of local recurrence.MethodsA literature search using the Medline and Ovid databases between 1965 and 2011 was conducted using the terms ‘breast conservation’ and radiotherapy, and radiotherapy and DCIS. Only papers with randomised clinical trials published in English in adult were included. Only Level 2 evidence and above was included.ResultsThree meta-analyses and 17 randomised controlled trials have been published in invasive disease and one meta-analysis and four randomised controlled trials for DCIS. Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy provides a 15.7% decrease in local recurrence and 3.8% decrease in 15-year risk of breast cancer death. The key clinico-pathological factors, which enable stratification into high, intermediate or low risk groups include age, oestrogen receptor positivity, use of tamoxifen and extent of surgery. Absolute reductions in 15-year risk of breast cancer death in these three prediction categories are 7.8%, 1·1%, and 0·1% respectively Adjuvant radiotherapy provides a 60% risk reduction in local recurrence in DCIS with no impact on distal metastases or overall survival. Size, pathological subtype and margins are major risk factors for local recurrence in DCIS.ConclusionsAdjuvant radiotherapy consistently decreases local recurrence across all subtypes of invasive and in-situ disease. While it has a survival advantage in those with invasive disease, this is not seen with DCIS and is minimal in invasive disease where the risk of local recurrence is low. This group includes women over 70 with node negative, ER positive tumours<2 cm.     

Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy in the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma measuring 4 cm or greater

BackgroundThe safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) has not been demonstrated in large ILC tumors, potentially contributing to the higher mastectomy rates seen in ILC.MethodsWe queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with ILC measuring ≥4 cm and evaluated difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) between those treated with BCT versus mastectomy using a multivariate model.ResultsOf 180 patients, 30 (16.7%) underwent BCT and 150 (83.3%) underwent mastectomy. Patients undergoing mastectomy were younger (56.6 vs. 64.3 years, p = 0.003) and had larger tumors (7.2 vs. 5.4 cm, p < 0.001). While tumor size, nodal stage, receptor subtype, and margin status were significantly associated with RFS, there was no difference in RFS at 5 (p = 0.88) or 10 (p = 0.65) years for individuals undergoing BCT versus mastectomy.ConclusionsFor patients with ILC ≥4 cm, BCT provides similar tumor control as mastectomy, provided that negative margins are achieved.     

Clinical Outcome after Selective Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Background The effect of treatment of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast was evaluated, and factors associated with local recurrence were assessed. Methods The study involved 504 patients treated by means of wide local excision alone (WLE) (n = 91), wide local excision and radiotherapy (WLE+RT) (n = 119), or mastectomy (n = 294) at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2005. Clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were evaluated. Results The median time to follow-up was 6.7 years. The 8-year overall local recurrence rate was 12% after breast-conserving treatment (BCT) [15.6% after WLE and 8.8% after WLE+RT (P = 0.161)] and 0.9% after mastectomy (P < 0.0001). In total, 18 (66.7%) invasive local recurrences and 9 (33.3%) DCIS local recurrences occurred. The 8-year distant metastasis rate was 4% after BCT [4.3% after WLE and 4.2% after WLE+RT (P = 0.983)] and 0.9% after mastectomy (P = 0.048). Median tumor extent was 10, 15, and 35 mm for patients treated with WLE, WLE+RT, and mastectomy, respectively. Margins were involved in 6.4% of all patients. Factors associated with local recurrence were age younger than 40 years (HR 8.66), surgical margin involvement (HR 5.75), WLE (HR 26.77), and WLE+RT (HR 7.42). Conclusion BCT of DCIS bears the risk of residual disease progressing into invasive local recurrence and distant metastasis. A re-excision or mastectomy is therefore desired in all patients with unclear margins. Mastectomy treatment is associated with optimal local control and might be considered for patients younger than 40 years who are at high risk of local recurrence.