Use of an expanded gold standard to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy and visual inspection with acetic acid

We estimate the accuracy of colposcopy and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) while minimizing the effects of misclassification bias, and maximizing ascertainment of disease. VIA was performed by experienced physicians on a population‐based sample of women aged 30 to 49 years in rural Shanxi province, China. Each woman received VIA, liquid‐based cytology (LBC) and hybrid capture 2 (hc2, QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD; formerly Digene Corporation). Any woman who tested positive on any test had colposcopy, endocervical curettage (ECC) with directed biopsies as necessary and 4‐quadrant random biopsies from normal‐appearing areas of the cervix. A standard diagnosis based on colposcopy and directed biopsy, and an expanded diagnosis including ECC and 4‐quadrant random biopsy were generated for each woman. In 1,839 women, use of the expanded versus the standard diagnostic criteria increased the prevalence of histologically confirmed high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer (CIN2+) from 3.2% (59/1,839) to 4.2% (77/1,839) and decreased the sensitivity of VIA for CIN2+ from 69.5% (95% CI: 56.8–79.8) to 58.4% (95% CI: 47.3–68.8%) with little change in specificity of approximately 89%. Compared with the expanded diagnostic criterion, the sensitivity of a visual diagnosis of high‐grade CIN or cancer by a colposcopist was 49.4% (95% CI: 38.2–60.5). The use of an expanded diagnostic criterion in this study yielded more conservative estimates of the sensitivity of VIA and colposcopy.     

Impact of utilizing p16INK4A immunohistochemistry on estimated performance of three cervical cancer screening tests

The histopathological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2,3 (CIN 2,3) is subjective and prone to variability. In our study, we analyzed the impact of utilizing a biomarker (p16(INK4A)) together with histopathology to refine the "gold standard" utilized for evaluating the performance of 3 different cervical cancer screening tests: cervical cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Cervical biopsies from 2 South African cervical cancer screening studies originally diagnosed by a single pathologist were reevaluated by a second pathologist and a consensus pathology diagnosis obtained. Immunohistochemical staining for p16(INK4A) was then performed. The estimated sensitivity of some cervical cancer screening tests was markedly impacted by the criteria utilized to define CIN 2,3. Use of routine histopathology markedly underestimated the sensitivity of both conventional cytology and HPV DNA testing compared to an improved gold standard of consensus pathology and p16(INK4A) positivity. In contrast, routine histopathology overestimated the sensitivity of VIA. Our results demonstrate that refining the diagnosis of CIN 2,3 through the use of consensus pathology and immunohistochemical staining for p16(INK4A) has an important impact on measurement of the performance of cervical cancer screening tests. The sensitivity of screening tests such as HPV DNA testing and conventional cytology may be underestimated when an imperfect gold standard (routine histopathology) is used. In contrast, the sensitivity of other tests, such as VIA, may be overestimated with an imperfect gold standard.     

Validity of combined cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping with adjuvant DNA-cytometry in routine cervical screening: results from 31031 women from the Bonn-region in West Germany

Our aim was to improve the accuracy of routine cervical screening by a risk-adapted multimodal protocol with special focus on possible reduction and prognostic assessment of false positive results. A cohort of 31031 women from the Bonn-region in West Germany, median age 36 years, were screened by cytology (conventional or liquid-based), followed by PCR-based HVP detection with genotyping and adjuvant DNA image cytometry, if indicated, in a sequential manner. The true prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma (>/=CIN2) was 0.32% in the population as projected from cervical biopsies of 123 women (0.4%), of whom 100 showed >/=CIN2. Sensitivity of the cytology screening program at PapIIID/HSIL threshold for detecting histologically confirmed >/=CIN2 cases was 81%, with specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99, 20.9 and 99.9%, respectively. Of 38 women receiving the complete screening protocol, all the 31 >/=CIN2 cases were correctly detected by cytology alone, 30 by positive high-risk HPV genotype and 30 by aneuploid DNA profile. The combination of the three methods resulted in an up to 6.9% increase in PPV for >/=CIN2 at practically unchanged detection rate with the additional benefit of being able to predict the probable outcome of CIN1 lesions detected as false positives with any single test. Multimodal cervical screening might permit identification of those women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions likely to progress at an earlier and curable stage of disease and lengthen the screening interval in those with transient minor lesions caused by productive HPV infection.     

阴道镜下宫颈多点活检联合宫颈管搔刮术诊断宫颈病变的临床价值

目的:探讨阴道镜下宫颈多点活检联合宫颈管搔刮术（endocervical curettage，ECC）对诊断宫颈病变的临床价值。方法:选取2019年07月至2019年09月我院门诊经宫颈液基薄层细胞学（thinprep cytology test,TCT）检测异常和/或高危型人乳头瘤病毒（high risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV）感染的患者383例，所有患者均进行阴道镜下多点活检联合宫颈管搔刮术，术后送病检，比较阴道镜下宫颈单纯四象限多点活检和宫颈四象限多点活检联合ECC对诊断宫颈病变的符合率及漏诊率等。结果:单纯活检诊断出宫颈病变患者142例，未检出宫颈病变患者241例，阴道镜下多点活检联合宫颈管搔刮术诊断出宫颈病变患者163例，未检出宫颈病变患者220例，单纯多点活检阳性率为37.08%（142/383），宫颈多点活检联合ECC阳性率为42.56%（163/383），两种方法相比较，宫颈多点活检联合ECC诊断宫颈病变阳性率显著高于宫颈单纯多点活检，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.001）。以病检结果为金标准，阴道镜下单纯多点活检诊断宫颈病变142例，灵敏度为87.12%，特异度为100%，阳性预测值为100%，阴性预测值为91.29%，漏诊率为12.88%，总符合率为94.51%。结论:阴道镜下宫颈四象限单纯多点活检对诊断宫颈病变患者具有较高的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及诊断符合率，但仍存在一定的漏诊，需联合ECC进行诊断，以提高宫颈病变的检出率，减少宫颈病变的漏诊，有助于指导治疗。     

Accuracy of concurrent visual and cytology screening in detecting cervical cancer precursors in rural India

The high burden of cervical cancer and inadequate/suboptimal cytology screening in developing countries led to the evaluation of visual screening tests, like visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI). We describe the performance of VIA, VILI and cytology, carried out in a multinational project called "Screening Technologies to Advance Rapid Testing" in 5,519 women aged 30-49 years, in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). VIA, VILI and cytology were positive in 16.9%, 15.6% and 6.1% women, respectively. We found 57 cases of CIN2, 55 of CIN3 and 12 of cervical cancer; 90% of CIN3 and 43% CIN2 cases were positive for p16 overexpression and high-risk HPV infection, indicating a high validity of histological diagnosis. The sensitivity of VIA, VILI and cytology to detect high-grade CIN were 64.5%, 64.5% and 67.7%, respectively; specificities were 84.2%, 85.5% and 95.4%. A high proportion of p16 positive CIN 3 (93.8%) and 2 (76.9%) were positive on cytology compared with visual tests (68.8% and 53.8%, respectively) indicating a higher sensitivity of cytology to detect p16 positive high-grade CIN. However, the immediate availability of the results from the visual tests permits diagnosis and/or treatment to be performed in the same sitting, which can potentially reduce loss to follow-up when women must be recalled following positive cytology. Organizing visual screening services in low-resource countries may facilitate the gradual building of an infrastructure committed to screening allowing the eventual introduction of more sensitive, highly objective, reproducible and affordable human papillomavirus screening tests in future.     

Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala,India

Simple and inexpensive methods based on visual examination of the cervix are currently being investigated as alternative methods of cervical screening. The test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA), and Lugol's iodine (VILI) and conventional cytology were investigated in a cross-sectional study involving 4,444 women aged 25 to 65 years in Kerala, India. While detection of any acetowhite area constituted a low-threshold positive VIA, detection of well-defined, opaque acetowhite lesions close to or touching the squamocolumnar junction constituted a high-threshold positive VIA test. Detection of definite yellow iodine nonuptake areas in the transformation zone close to or touching the squamocolumnar junction constituted a positive VILI test. Cytology was considered positive if reported as atypia or worse lesions. All screened women were evaluated by colposcopy and biopsies were directed in 1,644 women (37.0%), which allowed the direct estimation of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. The reference diagnosis was based on a combination of histology and/or colposcopy. True disease status was defined as CIN 2 and worse lesions. A total of 149 (3.4%) women had CIN 2 or worse lesions. The sensitivities of low-threshold VIA, high-threshold VIA, VILI and cytology to detect CIN 2 or worse disease were 88.6%, 82.6%, 87.2% and 81.9%, respectively; the corresponding specificities were 78.0%, 86.5%, 84.7% and 87.8%. Our results indicate that VIA and VILI are suitable alternate screening tests to cytology for detecting cervical neoplasia in low-resource settings.     

Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic acid in Detecting High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Pre- and Post-Menopausal Thai Women with Minor Cervical CytologicalAbnormalities

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in detecting high-gradecervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pre- and post-menopausal women with atypical squamous cells ofundetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou (Pap)smears. Materials and Methods: Two hundred women (150 pre-menopausal and 50 post-menopausal) with ASCUSand LSIL cytology who attended the colposcopy clinic, Thammasat University Hospital, between March 2013and August 2014 were included. All women underwent VIA testing and colposcopy by gynecologic oncologists.Diagnostic values of VIA testing including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negativepredictive value (NPV) for detecting high-grade CIN were determined using the histopathology obtained fromcolposcopic-directed biopsy as a gold standard. Results: VIA testing was positive in 54/150 (36%) pre-menopausalwomen and 5/50 (10%) post-menopausal women. Out of 54 pre-menopausal women with positive VIA testing,15 (27.8%) had high-grade CIN and 39 (72.2%) had either CIN 1 or insignificant pathology. Ten (10.4%), 43(44.8%) and 43 (44.8%) out of the remaining 96 pre-menopausal women with negative VIA testing had highgradeCIN, CIN 1 and insignificant pathology, respectively. Out of 5 post-menopausal women with positive VIAtesting, there were 4 (80%) women with high-grade CIN, and 1 (20%) women with insignificant pathology. Outof 45 VIA-negative post-menopausal women, 42 (93.3%) women had CIN 1 and insignificant pathology, and 3(6.7%) had high-grade CIN. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the VIA testing were 59.4%, 76.2%, 32.2%and 90.8%, respectively (60%, 68.8%, 27.8% and 89.6% in pre-menopausal women and 57.1%, 97.7%, 80%and 93.3% in post-menopausal women). Conclusions: VIA testing may be used as a screening tool for detectinghigh-grade CIN in women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities in a low-resource setting in order tolower the rate of colposcopy referral.     

Screening for cervical cancer in India: How much will it cost? A trial based analysis of the cost per case detected

The cost and cost effectiveness of screening previously unscreened women by VIA, cytology or HPV testing was investigated within a large cluster randomised trial involving 131,178 women in rural India. All resources involved in implementation, training, management, recruitment, screening and diagnosis were identified and costed. We estimated the total costs and detection rates for each cluster and used these data to calculate an average cluster cost and detection rate for each screening approach. These estimates were combined to estimate a cost per case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or invasive cancer (CIN 2/3+) detected. The average total costs per 1,000 women eligible for screening were US dollar 3,917, US dollar 6,609 and US dollar 11,779 with VIA, cytology and HPV respectively. The cost of detecting a case of CIN2/3+ using VIA was dollar 522 (95% CI dollar 429- dollar 652). Our results suggest that more CIN2/3+ cases would be detected in the same population if cytology were used instead of VIA and each additional case would cost US dollar 1065 (95% CI dollar 713- dollar2175). Delivering cervical cancer screening is potentially expensive in a low-income country although costs might be lower outside a trial setting. We found screening with VIA to be the least expensive option, but it also detected fewer cases of CIN2/3+ than other methods; its long-term cost-effectiveness will depend on the long-term benefits of early detection. Cytology was more effective at detecting cases than VIA but was also more expensive. Our findings indicate that HPV may not be a cost effective screening strategy in India at current consumable prices.     

Evaluation of cytology and visual triage of human papillomavirus‐positive women in cervical cancer prevention in India

Although virtually all cervical cancers and most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) are caused by persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, only a small proportion of HPV‐positive women have or will develop CIN. Triaging HPV‐positive women has been suggested to reduce the false‐positive rate and proportion of women referred for CIN confirmation and/or treatment. In two cross‐sectional studies and one randomized trial in India, we evaluated the impact of using cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to triage HPV‐positive women on the proportion of women who would be referred for CIN confirmation and on the detection rates of high‐grade CIN. We present the numbers of HPV test‐positive women found and the CIN detected among them. We further assess the proportions that would be referred for CIN confirmation with colposcopy/biopsy and CIN that would be detected if cytology triage or VIA triage were used. Using cytology triage at atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance threshold or VIA triage reduced referrals for colposcopy by about 62% and 59%, respectively (p‐value = 0.012), but missed around 16% and 18%, respectively, of the high‐grade CIN (p‐value = 0.539) indicating similar performance of both triaging approaches. The choice of a triage test in different low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) would depend on the availability and affordability in the particular setting. Cytology triage may be considered in settings where adequate infrastructure exists, whereas VIA triage may be suitable in settings with limited or no cytology infrastructure.     

Comparison of visual inspection with acetic acid and cervical cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia among HIV-infected women in India

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women in India and other developing country settings are living longer on antiretroviral therapy, yet their risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cervical cancer remains unabated because of lack of cost-effective and accurate secondary prevention methods. Visual inspection after application of dilute acetic acid on the cervix (VIA) has not been adequately studied against the current standard: conventional cervical cytology (Pap smears) among HIV-infected women. We evaluated 303 nonpregnant HIV-infected women in Pune, India, by simultaneous and independent screening with VIA and cervical cytology with disease ascertainment by colposcopy and histopathology. At the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) disease threshold, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value estimates of VIA were 80, 82.6, 47.6 and 95.4% respectively, compared to 60.5, 59.6, 22.4 and 88.7% for the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or severe (ASCUS+) cutoff on cytology, 60.5, 64.6, 24.8 and 89.4% for the low-grade squamous intraepithelial cells or severe (LSIL+) cutoff on cytology and 20.9, 96.0, 50.0 and 86.3% for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or severe (HSIL+) cutoff on cytology. A similar pattern of results was found for women with the presence of carcinogenic HPV-positive CIN2+ disease, as well as for women with CD4+ cell counts <200 and <350 μL(-1) . Overall, VIA performed better than cytology in this study with biologically rigorous endpoints and without verification bias, suggesting that VIA is a practical and useful alternative or adjunctive screening test for HIV-infected women. Implementing VIA-based screening within HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome care programs may provide an easy and practical means of complementing the highly anticipated low-cost HPV-based rapid screening tests in the near future, thereby contributing to improve program effectiveness of screening.     

Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India

Cervical cancer is the main cancer among women in sub-Saharan Africa, India and other parts of the developing world. Evaluation of screening performance of effective, feasible and affordable early detection and management methods is a public health priority. Five screening methods, naked eye visual inspection of the cervix uteri after application of diluted acetic acid (VIA), or Lugol's iodine (VILI) or with a magnifying device (VIAM), the Pap smear and human papillomavirus testing with the high-risk probe of the Hybrid Capture-2 assay (HC2), were evaluated in 11 studies in India and Africa. More than 58,000 women, aged 25-64 years, were tested with 2-5 screening tests and outcome verification was done on all women independent of the screen test results. The outcome was presence or absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of different degrees or invasive cervical cancer. Verification was based on colposcopy and histological interpretation of colposcopy-directed biopsies. Negative colposcopy was accepted as a truly negative outcome. VIA showed a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI 73-85%) and 83% (95% CI 77-89%), and a specificity of 85% (95% CI 81-89%) and 84% (95% CI 80-88%) for the outcomes CIN2+ or CIN3+, respectively. VILI was on average 10% more sensitive and equally specific. VIAM showed similar results as VIA. The Pap smear showed lowest sensitivity, even at the lowest cutoff of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (57%; 95% CI 38-76%) for CIN2+ but the specificity was rather high (93%; 95% CI 89-97%). The HC2-assay showed a sensitivity for CIN2+ of 62% (95% CI 56-68%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92-95%). Substantial interstudy variation was observed in the accuracy of the visual screening methods. Accuracy of visual methods and cytology increased over time, whereas performance of HC2 was constant. Results of visual tests and colposcopy were highly correlated. This study was the largest ever done that evaluates the cross-sectional accuracy of screening tests for cervical cancer precursors in developing countries. The merit of the study was that all screened subjects were submitted to confirmatory investigations avoiding to verification bias. A major finding was the consistently higher sensitivity but equal specificity of VILI compared with VIA. Nevertheless, some caution is warranted in the interpretation of observed accuracy measures, since a certain degree of gold standard misclassification cannot be excluded. Because of the correlation between visual screening tests and colposcopy and a certain degree of over-diagnosis of apparent CIN2+ by study pathologists, it is possible that both sensitivity and specificity of VIA and VILI were overestimated. Gold standard verification error could also explain the surprisingly low sensitivity of HC2, which contrasts with findings from other studies.     

Visual inspection as a cervical cancer screening method in a primary health care setting in Africa

We evaluated the feasibility and performance of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) for cervical cancer screening in a primary health-care setting in Kinshasa, Congo. Women (1,528) aged > or =30 years were screened independently by nurses and physicians by VIA and VILI and Pap cytology. Biopsy samples were obtained from women with abnormal colposcopies and from 290 randomly chosen women with normal colposcopy. Cytological and histological examinations were performed in Lyon and Montreal, respectively. The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grades 1, 2 and 3 was 4.5, 1.3 and 4%, respectively. Using biopsy as the reference, the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) for > or =CIN 2 for VIA-nurse were 55.5% (95% CI: 34.7-76.2), 64.6% (95% CI: 62.0-67.1) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.5-98.7), respectively. The corresponding values for VILI-nurse were 44.0% (95% CI: 24.2-63.8), 74.6% (95% CI: 72.3-76.9) and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.7-98.6). The equivalent parameters for physicians were 71.1% (95% CI: 46.7-95.5), 71.3% (95% CI: 68.9-73.6) and 98.6% (95% CI: 96.0-99.7) for VIA and 68.3% (95% CI: 42.5-94.0), 76.2% (95% CI: 74.0-78.4) and 97.2% (95% CI: 95.3-98.5) for VILI. The sensitivity of cytology ranged between 31 and 72%, depending on the abnormality threshold used to define positivity, with a corresponding specificity range of 94-99% and a NPV range of 97-99%. Our results show that VIA and VILI performed by nurses and physicians are slightly more sensitive but less specific than Pap cytology across multiple combinations of test and lesion thresholds. Given their lower cost and easy deployment, visual inspection methods merit further assessment as cervical cancer screening methods for low-resource countries.     

Risk assessment to guide cervical screening strategies in a large Chinese population

Three different cervical screening methods [cytology, human papillomavirus(HPV) testing and visual inspection with acetic acid(VIA)] are being considered in China for the national cervical screening program. Comparing risks of CIN3 and cervical cancer (CIN3+) for different results can inform test choice and management guidelines. We evaluated the immediate risk of CIN3+ for different screening results generated from individual and combined tests. We compared tests using a novel statistic designed for this purpose called Mean Risk Stratification (MRS), in a pooled analysis of 17 cross sectional population‐based studies of 30,371Chinese women screened with all 3 methods and diagnosed by colposcopically‐directed biopsies. The 3 tests combined powerfully distinguished CIN3+ risk; triple‐negative screening conferred a risk of 0.01%, while HPV‐positive HSIL+ that was VIA‐positive yielded a risk of 57.8%. Among the three screening tests, HPV status most strongly stratified CIN3+ risk. Among HPV‐positive women, cytology was the more useful second test. In HPV‐negative women, the immediate risks of CIN3+ ranged from 0.01% (negative cytology), 0.00% (ASC‐US), 1.1% (LSIL), to 6.6 (HSIL+). In HPV‐positive women, the CIN3+ risks were 0.9% (negative cytology), 3.6% (ASC‐US), 6.3% (LSIL) and 38.5% (HSIL+). VIA results did not meaningful stratify CIN3+ risk among HPV‐negative women with negative or ASC‐US cytology; however, positive VIA substantially elevated CIN3+ risk for all other, more positive combinations of HPV and cytology compared with a negative VIA. Because all 3 screening tests had independent value in defining risk of CIN3+, different combinations can be optimized as pragmatic strategies in different resource settings.     

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of 'see and treat' with cryotherapy by nurses in a cervical screening study in India

We evaluated a 'see and treat' procedure involving screening, colposcopy, biopsy and cryotherapy by trained nurses in one-visit in field clinics in a cervical screening study in South India for its acceptability, safety and effectiveness in curing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Women positive on visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) were advised colposcopy, directed biopsies and cryotherapy if they had colposcopic impression of CIN in one visit by nurses in field clinics supervised by a doctor. Side effects and complications were assessed and cure rates were evaluated with VIA, colposcopy and biopsy if colposcopic abnormalities were suspected. Cure was defined as no clinical or histological evidence of CIN at > or =6 months from treatment. Of the 2513 women offered 'see and treat' procedure, 1879 (74.8%) accepted. Of the 1397 women with histologically proved CIN treated with cryotherapy, 1026 reported for follow-up evaluation. Cure rates were 81.4% (752 out of 924) for women with CIN 1; 71.4% (55 out of 77) for CIN 2 and 68.0% (17 out of 25) for CIN 3. Minor side effects and complications were documented in less than 3% of women. 'See and treat' with cryotherapy by nurses under medical supervision is acceptable, safe and effective for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings.     

Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial

Our study directly compares the performance of liquid-based (LBC) and conventional cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer (CIN 2+) in high-risk, previously unscreened women. As part of a larger randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a "screen and treat" program for cervical cancer prevention, 5,652 South African women, aged 35 to 65 years, were screened using either ThinPrep or conventional Papanicolaou cytology. The cytology method used (i.e., ThinPrep or conventional) was rotated on a 6-month basis for the duration of the study. Directly following collection of the cytology specimen, all women underwent colposcopy with endocervical curettage and biopsy of all colposcopic abnormalities. Assessment of cytology and histology results was blinded and results were compared using histology-confirmed CIN as the "gold standard." The accuracy of LBC and conventional cytology was statistically equivalent, although the sensitivity of conventional cytology was at least 5 percentage points higher at all cutoff levels. For example, at a cytology cutoff level of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, the sensitivity of LBC was 60.3% for CIN2+ vs. 69.1% for conventional cytology and specificity was 94.1% and 94.5%, respectively. LBC specimens were significantly less likely to be "satisfactory-but-limited-by" (6.5% vs. 27.9%) but significantly more likely to be unsatisfactory (2.2% vs. 0.8%). Thus, in this high-risk population, the sensitivity of LBC is no greater than the sensitivity of conventional cytology. Because of the higher unit cost of LBC, low resource settings should carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of LBC before adopting this new technology.     

Comparison between Visual Inspection of Cervix and Cytology Based Screening Procedures in Bangladesh

Background: Cervical cancer continues to be a major problem in Bangladesh with approximately 18,000 newcases annually of which over 10,000 women die from it. Visual inspection of the cervix after 3-5% acetic acid(VIA) application is a simple and easy to learn method for cervical cancer screening, although cytology-basedscreening is more often applied in developed countries where it has successfully reduced the prevalence of cervicalcancer. Objective: To compare the efficacy of VIA and cytology-based primary methods for cervical cancerscreening in Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: This hospital based comparative study was conducted at theVIA centre and Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) from October2008 to October 2010. Results: Among 650 women, 74 (11.4%) were VIA+ve and 8 (1.2%) had abnormalitiesin their Pap smear reports. During colposcopy, 38 (7.7%) women had different grades of CIN and 4 (0.6%)had cervical cancer. The gold standard histology findings proved 20 women had CIN I, 14 had CIN II/II and 4had cervical cancer. Among the 38 histology diagnosed abnormalities, VIA test could identify 30 abnormalitiesincluding two cervical cancers. However, Pap smear could detect only 8 cases of histological abnormalities (2low grade and 6 had high grade lesion) and it missed all the cervical cancer cases. The sensitivity and specificityof VIA were 88.9% and 52.1%. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were41.0%, and 92.6% respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Pap smear were 33.3%,95.8%, 75.0% and 79.3%, respectively. Conclusions: VIA test should be used as the primary screening tool evenwith its low sensitivity and specificity in low resource countries like Bangladesh. False positive results may begreater, but overtreatment can be minimized by colposcopy evaluation of the VIA positive women.     

山西省襄垣县2009~2015年农村女性宫颈癌筛查项目结果分析

[目的]通过分析襄垣县2009～2015年农村妇女宫颈癌筛查结果,为国家宫颈癌筛查项目的评价和优化提供理论依据.[方法]对襄垣县35～64岁妇女开展宫颈癌筛查.2009～2013年采用醋酸/碘染色后肉眼观察(VIA/VILI),2014年开始部分引入人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)检测,2015年又引入新柏氏液基细胞学(TCT)检测,根据卫生资源情况在不同人群中分别使用三种方法.任意筛查结果阳性者转诊阴道镜,镜下有病变时取活检,以病理诊断为金标准.通过评价不同方法对宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级及以上病变的检出率评价不同方法对宫颈癌的筛查效果.[结果] 2009～2015年共筛查62 618名女性,其中CIN2级及以上(CIN2+)病变的患病率为0.76％,早诊率为90.53％,下生殖道感染率为25.68％,其中滴虫性阴道炎、细菌性阴道炎和宫颈炎与HPV感染相关.根据2014及2015年数据,VIA/VILI的CIN2+病变检出率为0.74％,TCT的病变检出率为0.70％,两者相似,但均低于HPV检测,其病变检出率为1.37％.[结论]HPV检测是首选的宫颈癌初筛方法,在资源匮乏地区,培训合格的基层医生使用VIA/VILI或TCT方法对适龄妇女开展宫颈癌筛查是有效的备选方案.     

Evaluation of multiple primary and combination screening strategies in postmenopausal women for detection of cervical cancer in China

As China's population ages, the importance of determining prevalence of cervical disease and accurate cervical cancer screening strategies for postmenopausal women is increasing. Seventeen population‐based studies were analyzed to determine prevalence of cervical neoplasia in postmenopausal women. All women underwent HPV DNA testing, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and cytology testing. Diagnostic values for primary and combinations screening methods included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), referral rate and area under curve (AUC) were calculated using directed biopsy or four quadrants biopsy as reference standard. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women had equal HPV infection and cervical neoplasia rates (p > 0.05). HPV DNA testing CIN3+ sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, referral rate and AUC were 97.9% (95% CI: 90.2–99.9%), 84.2% (95% CI: 82.8–85.5%), 9.9% (95% CI: 7.4–12.8%), 100% (95% CI: 99.8–100%), 17.2% (95% CI: 15.9–18.7%), 0.911, respectively. VIA values were 41.7% (95% CI: 28.4–55.9%), 94.5% (95% CI: 93.6–95.3%), 11.8% (95% CI: 7.5–17.3%), 98.9% (95% CI: 98.5–99.3%), 6.2% (95% CI: 5.3–7.1%) and 0.681, respectively. Values for VIA with HPV triage were 39.6% (95% CI: 26.6–53.8%), 99.2% (95% CI: 98.8–99.5%), 45.2% (95% CI: 30.8–60.4%), 98.9% (95% CI: 98.5–99.3%), 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1–2.0%) and 0.694, respectively. VIA and HPV DNA co‐test values were 100% (95% CI: 94.0–100%), 79.5% (95% CI: 78.0–81.0%), 8.0% (95% CI: 6.0–10.3%), 100% (95% CI: 99.9–100%), 21.9% (95% CI: 20.4–23.4%) and 0.898, respectively. VIA sensitivity decreases significantly in postmenopausal women compared to premenopausal performance. HPV DNA testing maintains performance between pre‐ and postmenopausal women and is the most accurate primary modality for screening postmenopausal populations in low resource areas of China.     

Diagnostic accuracy of VIA and HPV detection as primary and sequential screening tests in a cervical cancer screening demonstration project in India

Visual inspection after acetic acid application (VIA) and human papillomavirus (HPV) detection tests have been recommended to screen women for cervical cancer in low and middle income countries. A demonstration project in rural India screened 39,740 women with both the tests to compare their accuracies in real population setting. The project also evaluated the model of screening women in the existing primary health care facilities, evaluating the screen positive women with colposcopy (and biopsy) in the same setup and recalling the women diagnosed to have disease for treatment at tertiary center. Accuracy of VIA and HPV test used sequentially was also studied. VIA was performed by trained health workers and Hybrid Capture II (HC II) assay was used for oncogenic HPV detection. Test positivity was 7.1% for VIA and 4.7% for HC II. Detection rate of CIN 3+ disease was significantly higher with HC II than VIA. Sensitivities of VIA and HC II to detect 162 histology proved CIN 3+ lesions were 67.9 and 91.2%, respectively after adjusting for verification bias. Specificity for the same disease outcome and verification bias correction was 93.2% for VIA and 96.9% for HC II. Triaging of VIA positive women with HPV test would have considerably improved the positive predictive value (4.0 to 37.5% to detect CIN 3+) without significant drop in sensitivity. All VIA positive women and 74.0% of HC II positive women had colposcopy. There was high compliance to treatment and significant stage‐shift of the screen‐detected cancers towards more early stage.     

High load for most high risk human papillomavirus genotypes is associated with prevalent cervical cancer precursors but only HPV16 load predicts the development of incident disease

Cervicovaginal human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load has been purported as a potential marker for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (>/=CIN2). To examine disease association with type-specific viral load for the full-range of anogenital HPV infections, we conducted cross-sectional and prospective analyses of approximately 2,000 HPV-infected women from a 10,000-woman population-based study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica with 7 years of follow-up. Cervical specimens were tested for >40 HPV types using a MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR method with type-specific dot blot hybridization and PCR signal intensity as a measure of viral load. A positive association was observed between prevalent >/=CIN2 and high viral load compared to low viral load for women with baseline single HPV16 infections (OR = 19.2, 95% CI = 4.4-83.2) and single non-16 carcinogenic infections (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 2.1-39.9). Inclusion of women with multiple HPV types did not substantially change these associations. In prospective follow-up, only women infected with HPV16 alone (OR = 27.2, 95% = 3.5-213.5) had a strong association between high viral load and incident >/=CIN2; non-16 carcinogenic high viral load was not associated with incident >/=CIN2 (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.2-1.9). Single noncarcinogenic type viral load was not associated with increased risk of prevalent or incident >/=CIN2 (OR = 1.2 and 1.1, respectively). In conclusion, carcinogenic high viral load was associated with prevalent >/=CIN2; however HPV16 was uniquely associated with incident >/=CIN2. The extent to which these observations can be translated into clinical practice must be rigorously examined in the context of the method of viral load measurement and the type-specific differences observed for incident >/=CIN2.