Storage of G-CSF-mobilized granulocyte concentrates

BACKGROUND: Current standards limit granulocyte storage to 24 hours. Since G-CSF inhibits granulocyte apoptosis, it may be possible to store G-CSF-mobilized granulocytes for longer periods while maintaining cell viability and function. However, G-CSF mobilization increases the yield of granulocytes several times, and the resulting higher cell concentrations may diminish viability during storage and significant levels of pyrogenic cytokines may be produced. STUDY DESIGN: Ten granulocyte donors were given dexamethasone (8 mg PO), G-CSF (5 microg/kg SQ), or both and on the next day granulocyte concentrates were collected using a blood cell separator. Component cell counts, cell viablilities, pH, and IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF levels were measured at 2 to 4 (2), 20 to 28 (24), and 44 to 52 hours (48 hours). RESULTS: Significantly more granulocytes were collected when donors were given G-CSF (4.2 +/- 2.3 x 10(10)) or G-CSF plus dexamethasone (6.4 +/- 2.5 x 10(10)) compared with that collected with dexamethasone alone (2.2 +/- 1.2 x 10(10)); p = 0.03 and p = 0.002, respectively. Storage had little effect on WBC count. Slight but significant increases in IL-1beta and IL-8 occurred after 24 and 48 hours as compared to the levels at 2 hours' storage. Levels of IL-6 and TNF did not change. The pH dropped significantly with time in granulocytes mobilized with each regimen. Granulocytes mobilized with G-CSF plus dexamethasone were acidic immediately after collection, and pH was below 6.0 after 24 hours. To assess the effect of cell concentrations on pH, serial dilutions were performed on 13 granulocyte concentrates in autologous plasma prior to storage. The pH remained above 7.0 only when dexamethasone-mobilized granulocytes were diluted 1-in-8 and when the G-CSF plus dexamethasone-mobilized granulocytes were diluted 1-in-16. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize storage pH, mobilized granulocyte concentrates require a 1-in-8 to 1-in-16 dilution, which is operationally impractical. Clinical-grade granulocyte preservative solutions are needed to maintain pH during storage.     

Serial granulocytapheresisunder daily administration of rHuG-CSF: effects on peripheral blood counts, collection efficiency, and yield

BACKGROUND: An option for treatment of severe infections in neutropenic patients is the transfusion of granulocytes from donors stimulated with rHuG-CSF. The schedule of rHuG-CSF-stimulated granulocyte donations and the quality of the components remain controversial. This study was done with the intention of ensuring daily granulocyte support with therapeutic cell numbers, while keeping the patients' allogeneic exposure as low as possible. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Granulocyte collection with multiple consecutive leukapheresis procedures under daily rHuG-CSF administration and with hydroxyethyl starch as sedimenting agent were prospectively studied. Complete blood counts of the donors, collection yield, and efficiency were analyzed. RESULTS: Products (n = 259) from 76 donors were examined. The median peripheral blood WBC and neutrophil counts were 28.1 g per L and 24.1 g per L, respectively, and they were significantly higher on Day 5 of collections than on Days 1 to 3. Platelet counts and Hb levels decreased steadily. Collection yields increased over time from 4.9 to 6.7 x 10(10) neutrophils. Side effects of cytokines and aphereses did not exceed World Health Organization grade II status. CONCLUSION: Repetitive daily rHuG-CSF administration-even under daily leukapheresis procedures-results in a continuing increase in WBC and neutrophil levels and thus leads to increased collection yields. Side effects are tolerable, although Hb and platelet levels should be monitored closely.     

Donor tolerance and results of stimulation with G-CSF alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the collection of granulocytes

Stimulation of healthy granulocyte donors allows the collection of therapeutic doses of granulocytes. The stimulation with G-CSF alone was compared with G-CSF plus dexamethasone. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, at leukapheresis, and at follow-up visit. Donors answered a questionnaire to evaluate side effects of the stimulation regimen. The combination of G-CSF and dexamethasone resulted in higher WBC count than G-CSF alone (39.4 +/- 7.8 vs. 34.8 +/- 8.3/nl). Glucose (136 +/- 45 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase (195 +/- 38) increased significantly after stimulation with G-CSF plus dexamethasone but returned to baseline levels at the follow-up visit. Generally, stimulation was well tolerated by the donors. A higher rate of mild bone pain and headache was experienced in donors stimulated with G-CSF plus dexamethasone than in donors receiving G-CSF alone. Fatigue and myalgia were reported at similar rates in both groups. A high proportion of the donors stated that they would accept a further stimulation and granulocyte donation. At the follow-up visit, blood counts and chemistry had returned to normal values.     

In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was performed to evaluate the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, transfusion, and engraftment characteristics associated with use of a blood cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Oncology patients (n = 31) scheduled for an autologous PBPC transplant following myeloablative therapy were studied. PBPCs were mobilized by a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of G-CSF. As no prior studies evaluated whether PBPCs collected on the Amicus separator would be viable after transfusion, to ensure patient safety, PBPCs were first collected on another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter) and stored as backup. The day after the CS-3000 Plus collections were completed, PBPC collections intended for transfusion were performed using the Amicus instrument. For each transplant, >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPCs per kg of body weight were transfused. RESULTS: Clinical data collected on the donors immediately before and after PBPC collection with the Amicus device were comparable to donor data similarly obtained for the CS-3000 Plus collections. While the number of CD34+ cells and the RBC volume in the collected products were equivalent for the two devices, the platelet content of the Amicus collections was significantly lower than that of the CS-3000 Plus collections (4.35 x 10(10) platelets/bag vs. 6.61 x 10(10) platelets/bag, p<0.05). Collection efficiencies for CD34+ cells were 64 +/- 23 percent for the Amicus device and 43 +/- 14 percent for the CS-3000 Plus device (p<0.05). The mean time to engraftment for cells collected via the Amicus device was 8.7 +/- 0.7 days for >500 PMNs per microL and 9.7 +/- 1.5 days to attain a platelet count of >20,000 per microL-equivalent to data in the literature. No CS-3000 Plus backup cells were transfused and no serious adverse events attributable to the Amicus device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Amicus CD34+ cell collection efficiency was better (p<0.05) than that of the CS-3000 Plus collection. Short-term engraftment was durable. The PBPCs collected with the Amicus separator are safe and effective for use for autologous transplant patients requiring PBPC rescue from high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy.     

Uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C, with only 3.5-percent DMSO in cryoprotective solution for 109 autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantations

BACKGROUND: Although controlled-rate freezing and storage in liquid nitrogen are the standard procedure for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) cryopreservation, uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C have been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The prospective evaluation of 109 autologous PBPC transplantations after uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C of apheresis products is reported. The cryoprotectant solution contained final concentrations of 1-percent human serum albumin, 2.5-percent hydroxyethyl starch, and 3.5-percent DMSO. RESULTS: With in vitro assays, the median recoveries of nucleated cells (NCs), CD34+ cells, CFU-GM, and BFU-E were 60.8 percent (range, 11.2-107.1%), 79.6 percent (6.3-158.1%), 35.6 percent (0.3-149.5%), and 32.6 percent (1.7-151.1%), respectively. The median length of storage was 7 weeks (range, 1-98). The median cell dose, per kg of body weight, given to patients after the preparative regimen was 6.34 x 10(8) NCs (range, 0.02-38.3), 3.77 x 10(6) CD34+ cells (0.23-58.5), and 66.04 x 10(4) CFU-GM (1.38-405.7). The median time to reach 0.5 x 10(9) granulocytes per L, 20 x 10(9) platelets per L, and 50 x 10(9) reticulocytes per L was 11 (range, 0-37), 11 (0-129), and 17 (0-200) days, respectively. Hematopoietic reconstitution did not differ in patients undergoing myeloablative or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens before transplantation. CONCLUSION: This simple and less expensive cryopreservation procedure can produce successful engraftment, comparable to that obtained with the standard storage procedure.     

Combined administration of G-CSF and dexamethasone for the mobilization of granulocytes in normal donors: optimization of dosing

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of neutrophil (polymorphonuclear leukocyte, PMN) transfusion therapy has been compromised, in part, by the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of functional neutrophils from donors. Mobilization of PMNs in the peripheral blood of normal volunteers has been shown to be superior when G-CSF is administered in conjunction with dexamethasone to that when either agent is administered alone. The current study was conducted to determine the optimal dosages of G-CSF and dexamethasone to be administered to donors in a granulocyte transfusion program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five normal subjects were randomly assigned to each of the following single-dose regimens over five consecutive weeks: 1) subcutaneous (SC) G-CSF at 600 microg and oral (PO) dexamethasone at 8 mg; 2) SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 8 mg; 3) SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 12 mg; 4) SC G-CSF at 450 microg; and 5) PO dexamethasone at 12 mg. Venous blood was collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration for determination of absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Side effects of drug administration were recorded by using a standardized symptom questionnaire. RESULTS: Maximal ANC was achieved at 12 hours after administration of drugs under each regimen. All four regimens containing G-CSF caused greater than 10-fold increases in the ANC. When administered in conjunction with dexamethasone, G-CSF resulted in statistically similar PMN mobilization at dosages of 450 microg and 600 microg. The combined single-dose regimen of SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 8 mg increased the mean ANC from a baseline value of 2800 per microL to 37,900 per microL at 12 hours after administration. This regimen was well tolerated by the normal volunteers. CONCLUSION: In a single-dose format designed for clinical granulocyte transfusion programs, optimal PMN mobilization can be achieved in normal donors with a combined regimen of SC G-CSF at 450 microg, and PO dexamethasone at 8 microg.     

Granulocyte storage and antigen stability

BACKGROUND: Current methods for the detection of granulocyte antibodies require panels of freshly isolated cells. This makes these assays time-consuming, costly, and technically difficult. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The immunofluorescence method of detecting the binding of antibodies to granulocytes was modified for use with a flow cytometer, and methods were tested to store granulocytes for use in that assay. Granulocytes were stored at 4 degrees C for 7 days under three conditions: 1 -percent formaldehyde-fixed cells were stored in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS); untreated cells were stored in tissue culture medium (RPMI-1640); and cells were fixed and stored with a commercial white cell-storage solution (Cyto-Chex Reagent). Antigen stability was evaluated by using monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) and alloantibodies. Serologic studies were done by an indirect immunofluorescence assay and assessed by flow cytometric analysis. RESULTS: On Day 2, only 2 to 7 percent of granulocytes stored in RPMI-1640 remained. On Day 7, 67 to 76 percent of granulocytes fixed in formaldehyde and stored in HBSS remained, and 47 to 87 percent of granulocytes stored in a white cell-storage solution remained. All antigens were detectable by the MoAbs and alloantisera on Day 7. However, nonspecific staining by the fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody hindered interpretation of test results on Day 4. Non-specific staining occurred over time and was associated with increased cell permeability during storage. Two sources of nonspecific staining were identified. The first source was the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody; it was eliminated by switching to a phycoerythrin conjugate. The second source was factors in human serum; it was resolved by examining only viable, impermeable cells identified by using 7-aminoactinomycin-D. CONCLUSION: Granulocytes and their antigens can be preserved for at least 7 days, but evaluation of antibody reactions was possible for only 4 days as a result of non-specific staining due to enhanced membrane permeability of dying cells.     

G-CSF-induced spleen size changes in peripheral blood progenitor cell donors

BACKGROUND: PBPC donors given G-CSF experience splenic enlargement and, rarely, spontaneous rupture of the spleen. This study evaluated the incidence and time course of splenic enlargement in PBPC concentrate donors and assessed factors affecting size changes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty healthy adults were given G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) for 5 days and a PBPC concentrate was collected by apheresis. Ultrasound was used to assess craniocaudal spleen length before giving G-CSF, on the day of apheresis and 3 or 4 days after apheresis. The effects of donor age, gender, race, and changes in blood chemistries, blood counts, and CD34+ cell counts on spleen length change were assessed. RESULTS: Spleen length increased in 19 of 20 donors. Mean length changed from 10.9 +/- 2.0 cm before G-CSF to 12.3 +/- 2.1 cm on the day of apheresis (p < 0.001). The mean increase in length was 1.5 +/- 0.9 cm or 13.8 +/- 9.1 percent. Spleen length increased 20 percent or more in six subjects. The spleen length fell to 11.3 +/- 1.8 cm (p < 0.001) 3 or 4 days after apheresis, but it remained greater than baseline levels (p = 0.03). Spleen length change was not affected by donor gender, race, or age. There was no relationship between changes in spleen length and 1) baseline and apheresis-day blood counts and chemistries, or 2) changes in blood counts and chemistries. CONCLUSIONS: Spleen size increases in almost all PBPC donors. Enlargement is transient but may be marked in some donors and may place them at risk for splenic rupture.     

Kinetics of G-CSF-induced granulocyte mobilization in healthy subjects: effects of route of administration and addition of dexamethasone

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte donors are frequently given G-CSF with or without dexamethasone approximately 18 hours before apheresis to increase cell yields. The purpose of this study was to assess the kinetics of G-CSF plus dexamethasone neutrophil mobilization to determine whether the neutrophils can be mobilized and collected the same day. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects were given four separate mobilization regimens: IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg), subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg), IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg), and subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg). Blood cell counts were measured before and after G-CSF administration. RESULTS: Following all four mobilization regimens, neutrophil counts fell 0.5 hour after the mobilizing agents were given, rose above baseline levels at Hour 2, and increased further with each time interval to Hour 8. In the absence of dexamethasone at Hours 2 through 8, there was no difference in neutrophil counts by subcutaneous or IV G-CSF administration routes. The addition of dexamethasone enhanced mobilization of neutrophils from Hours 3 through 24. Through Hour 8, there was no difference in the degree of mobilization among the subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone and the IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone regimens. However, at Hour 24, neutrophil counts were sustained at higher levels with subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone than with IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Granulocyte mobilization response to subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone is sustained at peak levels for 8 to 24 hours after coadministration of the two drugs. There was no advantage to giving G-CSF intravenously.     

Blood component collection by apheresis

Apheresis component collection is a rapidly growing area in the blood collection field. Several instruments with varying capabilities are available. This is a brief review of the equipment available for granulocyte and apheresis component collection and indications for their use. In the United States, granulocytes are collected with the Fenwal CS3000, Fenwal CS3000 Plus, COBE (Gambro) Spectra, Haemonetics LN9000, and Fresenius AS 104. The use of hetastarch for sedimenting agent and stimulation with G-CSF and G-CSF plus dexamethasone have substantially increased granulocyte yields. Plateletapheresis is performed in the United States on the Fenwal CS3000, Fenwal CS3000 Plus, Fenwal Amicus, COBE (Gambro) Spectra, Gambro Trima Version 4, Gambro Trima Accel (Version 5), and Haemonetics LN9000. Automated red blood cell (RBC) collections are performed with the Haemonetics MCS+LN8150, Gambro Trima Version 4, Gambro Trima Accel (Version 5), Amicus, and Baxter Alyx. The RBC can be collected concurrently (with other components) in some instruments or separately in others. Plasma is collected concurrently on several instruments. Plasmapheresis for plasma only is performed on the Fenwal Autopheresis C and Haemonetics PCS2. Granulocyte yields range from 0.46 x 10(10) to 1.0 x 10(10) for unstimulated donors and 2.1 x 10(10) to 2.6 x 10(10) for donors stimulated with dexamethasone or prednisone. The use of G-CSF and G-CSF with dexamethasone has substantially increased granulocyte yields with yields of 4.1 x 10(10) to 10.8 x 10(10) reported. Platelet collection rates of 0.045-0.115 x 10(11) plt/min have been reported. Collection efficiencies of 46-85.7% have been reported. Automated (apheresis) component collection has the advantages of controlled volumes or doses of component, efficient use of the donor, multiple components from the same donor, better inventory control, and better quality control due to less manipulation of the individual components. Disadvantages of automated component collection include the use of expensive equipment and disposables, the need for specially trained machine operators, and lower capacity to collect large volumes of blood compared to whole blood donation. The use of apheresis component collection is rapidly growing to provide the best blood components in the most efficient manner.     

Processing of major ABO-incompatible bone marrow for transplantation by using dextran sedimentation

BACKGROUND: Various open and semi-closed methods are used for red cell (RBC) depletion and hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) enrichment of bone marrow (BM) in vitro, but with variable efficacy. A simple, efficient, and safe method using dextran 110k was developed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An equal volume of 4.5-percent dextran was applied to major ABO-incompatible BM in transfer bags and sedimentation was allowed for 30 minutes. RBCs, nucleated cells (NCs), and mononuclear cells (MNCs) from BM allografts before and after dextran sedimentation (DS) were counted. Flow cytometry, short-term cultures, and long-term cultures were performed to assay the respective recovery of CD34+ cells, colony-forming units (CFUs), and long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-ICs). RESULTS: Sixteen BM collections were processed.The mean volume was 666 mL (range, 189-1355 mL).The mean +/-1 SD post-DS NC, MNC, CD34+ cell, and CFU counts per kg of the recipient's body weight were 4.11 +/-1.74 x 10(8), 8.98 +/- 3.68 x 10(7), 2.90 +/- 1.95 x 10(6), and 2.03 +/- 2.01 x 10(5), respectively, with the corresponding post-DS recovery being 90.6 percent, 90 percent, 92.4 percent, and 100.8 percent. The numbers of LTC-ICs in cultures (up to 12 weeks) of pre-DS and post-DS samples of five BM allografts were comparable (p = 0.91). Residual RBCs were 5.1 +/- 4.6 (0.1-14) mL with depletion of 96.5 +/- 3.2 percent. There was no significant difference in the mean absolute RBC count in post-DS BM allografts and in four ficoll-treated BM allografts (8.09 x 10(10) vs. 4.9 x 10(9); p = 0.206) and in eight major ABO-incompatible peripheral blood HPC collections (8.09 x 10(10) vs. 9.81 x 10(10); p = 0.87). No posttransplant hemolysis was encountered. Engraftment occurred at 22 +/- 7 days, which is similar to that of four transplants with ficoll-treated BM allografts (22 +/- 9; p = 0.611) and 54 unprocessed BM allografts (19 +/- 6; p = 0.129). CONCLUSION: DS is an efficient method of depleting RBCs in major ABO-incompatible BM allografts without significant loss of HPCs.     

Impact of the mobilization regimen and the harvesting technique on the granulocyte yield in healthy donors for granulocyte transfusion therapy

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte mobilization and harvesting, the two major phases of granulocyte collection, have not been standardized. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The data on 123 granulocyte collections were retrospectively investigated for the effect of the mobilization regimen and the harvesting technique. After a single subcutaneous dose (600 µg) of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) with (n = 68) or without (n = 40) 8 mg of orally administered dexamethasone, 108 granulocyte donors underwent granulocyte collections. Moreover, 15 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors who had received 400 µg/m² or 10 µg/kg G‐CSF for 5 days underwent granulocyte collections on the day after the last PBSC collections (PBSC‐GTX donors). Granulocyte harvesting was performed by leukapheresis with (n = 108) or without (n = 15) using high‐molecular‐weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES). RESULTS: Granulocyte donors who received mobilization with G‐CSF plus dexamethasone produced significantly higher granulocyte yields than those who received G‐CSF alone (7.2 × 10¹⁰ ± 2.0 × 10¹⁰ vs. 5.7 × 10¹⁰ ± 1.7 × 10¹⁰, p = 0.006). PBSC‐GTX donors produced a remarkably high granulocyte yield (9.7 × 10¹⁰ ± 2.3 × 10¹⁰). The use of HES was associated with better granulocyte collection efficiency (42 ± 7.8% vs. 10 ± 9.1%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: G‐CSF plus dexamethasone produces higher granulocyte yields than G‐CSF alone. Granulocyte collection from PBSC donors appears to be a rational strategy, since it produces high granulocyte yields when the related patients are at a high risk for infection and reduces difficulties in finding granulocyte donors. HES should be used in apheresis procedures.     

Comparison of plateletpheresis concentrates produced with Spectra LRS version 5.1 and LRS Turbo version 7.0 cell separators

BACKGROUND: The importance of transfusing WBC-reduced blood components is widely recognized, as it reduces the risk of alloimmunization and transfusion-transmitted CMV infections. The latest generation of cell separators allows the collection of WBC-reduced apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive APCs (n = 232) were retrospectively evaluated: 163 collected with the Spectra LRS [leukocyte-reduction system] Version 5.1 (Group A) and 69 with the LRS Turbo Version 7.0 (Group B) (both: COBE BCT). Donor peripheral blood count, procedure data, platelet yield, collection efficiency (CE), and residual WBC count in APCs were recorded. RESULTS: The platelet yield was higher in Group B than in Group A: 5.5 +/- 1.4 versus 4.4 +/- 1.1, p<0.0001; residual WBCs were <5 x 10(6) in 99.4 percent of Group A APCs and in 97.1 percent of Group B APCs. CE was higher in Group B than in Group A: 51.4 +/- 8.7 versus 43.6 +/- 6.3, p<0.0001. Moreover, a correlation between predonation platelet count and platelet yield was observed in both groups. A double product (platelet yield >6.0 x 10(11)) was obtained in 28.9 percent of Group B APCs and in 9.2 percent of Group A APCs. CONCLUSIONS: The Spectra LRS Turbo version 7.0 release showed a better CE and resulted in a higher platelet harvest than did the LRS version 5.1. High predonation platelet counts allow a higher platelet yield.     

A feasibility evaluation of an automated bloodcomponent collection system platelets and red cells

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the functional properties of blood components collected with an automated collection system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-donor platelets (n = 44) and packed red cell (RBC) units (n = 10) were collected. In vitro and in vivo assays were used to assess the function of single-donor platelet components stored for 5 days and of packed RBC units after storage for 42 days at 4 degrees C. RESULTS: Adverse events observed in the 44 study subjects were minor. The mean 24-hour recovery value for the packed RBC units stored for 42 days was 83.6 +/- 5.4 percent, with a mean percentage of hemolysis on Day 42 at 0.46 +/- 0.19 percent. The 25 patients receiving platelet components achieved a mean corrected count increment of 15.1 +/- 10.4 x 10(3). All platelet concentrates had less than 1 x 10(6) total white cells. CONCLUSION: Both in vitro and in vivo testing for the packed RBCs collected and stored for 42 days met the standards for both hemolysis and percentage of 51Cr 24-hour RBC recovery. The in vitro results and transfusion data on white cell-reduced platelet components transfused to thrombocytopenic patients were comparable to those on available platelet components.     

Collection of two peripheral blood stem cell concentrates from healthy donors

When peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) concentrates are used for allogeneic transplants, two or more apheresis procedures must often be performed. To determine how many cells could be collected from healthy people by two back-to-back apheresis procedures and what effect these collections would have on donors, we gave 19 healthy people 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1 and 21 people 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 of granulocyte colony stimulating factor, filgrastim, for 5 days. We then collected two PBSC concentrates, one on day 5 and one on day 6. A third group of six people was given filgrastim 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 for 5 days but had no PBSC concentrates collected. PBSC concentrate cell counts and donor cell counts, symptoms, and blood chemistries were assessed for up to 1 year. On day 5, three times more CD34+ cells were collected from donors given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 than those given 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1 (P = 0.009) but on day 6 the quantity of cells collected was the same (P = 0.23). The total number of CD34+ cells collected was two times greater in donors given the higher dose of filgrastim (median = 579 x 10(6); range = 174-1639 x 10(6) compared to 237 x 10(6); 103-1670 x 10(6); P = 0.061). Platelet counts fell after each PBSC concentrate collection, but there were no differences between the two groups of donors in platelet counts measured immediately after each collection. The platelet counts also fell in people who did not donate PBSC concentrates. The lowest counts in all three groups of people also occurred on day 10. In PBSC donors given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 of filgrastim the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) fell below premobilization counts on day 14. In donors given 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1 the ANC fell below premobilization counts on days 21, 28 and 49, CD34+ cell counts were significantly lower than premobilization counts on days 14 and 28 in donors given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 of filgrastim and on day 14 in those given 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1. No decrease in neutrophil or CD34+ cell counts occurred after filgrastim was given in the people who did not donate PBSC concentrates. The incidence of symptoms was similar in both groups of PBSC concentrate donors, except that those given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 were more than twice as likely to experience myalgias as those receiving the lower dose (P = 0.029). Several blood chemistries changed. Levels of alkaline phosphatase, LDH, SGPT, SGOT, uric acid and sodium increased. Levels of bilirubin, total protein, potassium, calcium and chloride decreased. In conclusion, twice as many CD34+ cells were collected from donors given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 of filgrastim. Platelet, neutrophil and CD34+ cell counts fell after the PBSC concentrate collections. The fall in platelet counts was due to both the collection and the administration of filgrastim. The falls in neutrophil and CD34+ cell counts were due to the loss of haematopoietic progenitor cells in the PBSC concentrates. Allogeneic PBSC concentrate donors should be given 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1 of filgrastim, and if possible only one component should be collected in order to avoid thrombocytopenia.     

Evaluation of an automated system for the collection of packed RBCs, platelets, and plasma

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the quality of WBC-reduced platelets, RBCs, and plasma collected on a new system (Trima, Gambro BCT) designed to automate the collection of all blood components. The study also evaluated donor safety and suitability of these components for transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Phase I, the quality of the components collected on the new system was evaluated by standard in vitro and in vivo testing methods. Results were compared to those from control components collected by currently approved standard methods. In Phase II, additional collections were performed to evaluate the acceptability of the new system and the safety of platelets collected. RESULTS: In vivo 24-hour RBC recovery was 76.8 +/- 3.1 percent for the test RBC units and 77.1 +/- 4.4 percent recovery for whole-blood (control) RBCs. The differences between test and control platelet results in the in vivo and in vitro assays were not clinically significant. Plasma clotting factors and fibrinogen levels met international standards. The system was well accepted by donors, and no major adverse donor reactions were reported for the 68 procedures performed. No problems were reported with transfusing the blood components collected. CONCLUSION: Blood components collected with the Trima are equivalent to currently available components, and they meet the applicable regulatory standards. This system provides consistent, standardized components with predictable yields. It provides the option of fully automating the collection of all blood components.     

Evaluation and comparison of three mobilization methods for the collection of granulocytes

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapeutic regimens have become more potent and myeloablative. As a consequence, morbidity and mortality due to opportunistic infections have become a major challenge. The provision of adequate doses of viable granulocytes has thus become an important approach for circumventing the problem. A schedule for collecting therapeutic numbers of cells with minimal donor toxicity has yet to be established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An investigation of three mobilization schedules for the collection of granulocytes for transfusion–granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms per kg daily; G-CSF 5 micrograms per kg every other day, and prednisone 60 mg given orally (20 mg doses at 17 hours, 12 hours, and 2 hours before the collection). RESULTS: A total of 464 apheresis procedures involving 163 healthy donors were analyzed. Prednisone caused a small increase in the white cell (WBC) counts over the collection days, while G-CSF every other day and daily schedules improved WBC counts to 145 and 160 percent, respectively (p = 0.004). Similarly, administration of G-CSF daily and every other day mobilized higher yields of granulocytes over the collection days, compared to the prednisone schedule (170% and 180% vs. 105%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Compared with prednisone, higher WBC yields were achieved by G-CSF stimulation; G-CSF given every other day is as effective as daily G-CSF administration for the recruitment of granulocytes, which makes the mobilization procedure more cost- effective.     

A comparative trial of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and dexamethasone, separately and in combination, for the mobilization of neutrophils in the peripheral blood of normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) transfusion therapy has been compromised, in part, by the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of functional neutrophils from donors. To define the optimal conditions for mobilization of PMNs in granulocyte donors, the effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, separately and in combination, on PMN counts in normal volunteers were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five normal subjects were randomly assigned to each of the following single-dose regimens in 5 consecutive weeks: 1) G-CSF, 300 micrograms given subcutaneously; 2) G-CSF, 600 micrograms subcutaneously: 3) dexamethasone, 8 mg given orally; 4) G-CSF, 300 micrograms subcutaneously, plus dexamethasone, 8 mg orally; and 5) G-CSF, 600 micrograms subcutaneously, plus dexamethasone 8 mg orally. Venous blood was collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration for the determination of absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs). RESULTS: Maximal ANC was achieved at 12 hours after each regimen, except dexamethasone alone (maximum, 24 hours). Dexamethasone significantly increased the maximal ANC induced by either dose of G-CSF alone (p < 0.05). The greatest mobilization of PMNs occurred after the administration of G-CSF (600 micrograms) and dexamethasone (8 mg); the ANC increased from a mean baseline value of 3,594 per microL to 43,017 per microL at 12 hours. All of the drug regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone significantly increases the level of neutrophilia induced in normal subjects by G-CSF. The combination of dexamethasone and G-CSF (at the dosages used in this study) is a convenient, well-tolerated regimen for the mobilization of PMNs in the peripheral blood of granulocyte donors. Moreover, the optimal quantitative yield of PMNs is likely to be achieved by leukapheresis 12 hours after drug administration.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

A new apheresis procedure for the preparation of high-quality red cells and plasma

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent apheresis is an alternative way of preparing blood components that avoids the delay between collection and separation seen with standard whole-blood techniques. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An apheresis device has been modified to facilitate the combined collection of a unit (250 mL) of red cells (RBCs) and a high-volume unit (475 mL) of plasma. The procedure, using 8-percent ACD-A, has been tested in two European blood centers. Each center performed 20 procedures for in vitro evaluation of collected RBCs and plasma and 10 procedures for evaluation of in vivo RBC recovery. All RBCs were white cell reduced by filtration. One-half of the RBC units were stored in the additive solution Adsol and one-half in another such solution (Erythro-Sol). RESULTS: The target volumes of RBCs and plasma were obtained in 27 minutes (range, 20-44 min) by using three to six cycles in a single-needle procedure. Saline (275 mL) was used to replace fluid volume withdrawn in excess of standard whole-blood donation. No side effects occurred, with the exception of minor signs of hypocalcemia. RBC ATP was well maintained (>65% at Day 42) during storage; 2,3-DPG was less well maintained, with virtually none remaining at Day 21 in either Adsol or Erythro-Sol. The RBC in vivo recoveries, after 42 days of storage at 4+/-2 degrees C determined by the single-label method, were 86.7+/-7.2 percent (Erythro-Sol) and 84.4+/-8.1 percent (Adsol). Mean plasma factor VIII levels were >100 percent in all test groups. CONCLUSION: A novel automated technique for the simultaneous collection and preparation of RBCs and plasma has been evaluated. The apheresis procedure was acceptable and well tolerated by donors, and it resulted in high-quality blood components. Further optimization of the system should yield a practicable component suitable for routine use in blood banks.