Acute lung injury following an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with special reference to the clinical factors and cytokine levels of peripheral blood and pleural drainage fluid

SUMMARY.  Acute lung injury (ALI) is one of most serious complications to occur after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. However, the pathogenesis of ALI is still unclear. The cytokine levels of pleural drainage fluid as well as peripheral blood were measured in 27 patients who had undergone an extended radical esophagectomy. Both the clinical factors and cytokine levels were compared between 11 patients with (group I) and 16 without ALI (group II). ALI occurred more frequently in patients who underwent colon interposition than in those who received a gastric tube reconstruction (86% vs 25%, P  = 0.009). The operation time of group I was significantly longer than that of group II. A logistic regression analysis revealed colon interposition to be an independent factor associated with the ALI ( P <  0.05). Postoperative anastomotic leakage and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) occurred more frequently in group I than in group II ( P <  0.01). Both the serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 levels of group I were significantly higher than those of group II. IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α were undetectable in the peripheral blood, whereas they were detectable in the pleural effusion. The IL-1β of pleural effusion was higher in group I than group II. In conclusion, greater surgical stress, such as a longer operative time, is thus considered to be associated with the first attack of ALI. The adverse events developing in the extra-thoracic site, such as necrosis and local infection around anastomosis may therefore be the second attack. Furthermore, ALI may cause not only SIRS but also other complications such as anastomotic leakage.     

Synchronous esophageal and renal cell carcinoma

Multiple cancer associated with esophageal cancer is not uncommon; however, synchronous esophageal and renal cell carcinoma is very rare. Only three cases have been reported to date, and one of these patients was treated in our institution. We have since successfully treated another patient. Here, we report the two cases treated in our institution. In the first case, esophagectomy, nephrectomy, and reconstruction using a gastric tube were carried out in one stage. Post-operative renal function was temporarily impaired by the complications of anastomotic leakage and pyothorax but no hemodialysis was needed. In the second case, as the patient had undergone distal gastrectomy because of gastric cancer, we chose a two-stage operation, i.e. esophagectomy and nephrectomy as the first stage, followed by reconstruction using a colon substitute after 4 weeks, resulting in only slight renal dysfunction. Patients 1 and 2 are alive and well 7 years and 2 years after the operations respectively.     

Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in the neck after retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer can induce life-threatening morbidity. This study investigated the predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in the neck after retrosternal reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: A total of 129 esophageal carcinoma patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck via a retrosternal approach were enrolled between April 1985 and March 2002. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage were statistically evaluated. In a preliminary study using 18 cases, thoracic inlet space (TIS) was recommended to be extended more than 700 mm2. RESULTS: Partial resection of the bony structures was performed in 32 patients. The method of anastomosis and partial resection of bony structures according to the TIS independently influenced the likelihood of anastomotic leakage, with hand-sewn anastomosis and an absence of partial resection increasing its occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled anastomosis following the partial resection of the sternum and the left clavicle is recommended to avoid anastomotic leakage. These findings should be clarified by a randomized controlled study in a high-volume hospital.     

Anterior vs. Posterior Mediastinal Routes in Colon Interposition after Esophagectomy

Background/Aims: Colon interposition is the most commonly used method of esophageal reconstruction when the stomach cannot be used; however, this method may cause surgical complications such as anastomotic leakage and sepsis due to colon necrosis. Therefore, many surgeons use a retrosternal or subcutaneous route because it is easier to manage the subcutaneous drainage when anastomotic leakage occurs. However, some researchers have reported that the posterior mediastinal route provides better long-term functional outcomes after surgery than the anterior mediastinal route. Thus, in this study, we compared these reconstruction routes used for colon interposition, with or without the supercharge technique, in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy, who have undergone colon interposition after esophagectomy. Methodology: We retrospectively studied 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction route: the anterior mediastinal or subcutaneous route (A group), or the posterior mediastinal route (R group). Results: Anastomotic leakages were observed in 4 patients (26.7%) in the A group and in 1 patient (6.7%) in the R group. Conclusions: Ischemia is not always the result of arterial failure, but may also originate from venous blood flow impairment due to injury or distortion of veins.     

Modification of the procedure for esophageal reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Reconstruction after esophagectomy is still associated with the highest risk of anastomotic leakage among all of the gastrointestinal anastomoses. In 1994, the reconstruction phase of our procedure was modified aiming to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. We evaluated usefulness of our modified procedure. METHODOLOGY: 32 patients before the modification of reconstruction were included in Group A, whereas Group B included 80 patients after the modification. In Group A, a thin gastric tube was constructed along the greater curvature. In Group B, the gastric tube was made thinner and longer. We were able to preserve a vessel feeding the terminal segment of the gastric tube that secured ample blood supply to this segment. The cut end of the cervical esophagus was anastomosed to the posterior wall of the gastric tube near the greater curvature, where adequate blood supply is available, and the anastomotic line was covered with omentum. RESULTS: In Group A, anastomotic leakage occurred in 15.6%. In Group B, minor leaks occurred 2.5%, indicating a marked decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The method of esophageal reconstruction currently performed at our department does not require special techniques, but the occurrence of anastomotic leakage is very low.     

Surgical results of patients after esophageal resection or extended gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

Precise classification of cancers of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert may be difficult for the presence of Barrett's esophagus or hiatal hernia, which subsequently leads to a difficult choice of the surgical procedure of esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Ninety-six patients with such cancers were operated on in our department in 7 years. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%), classified as type I (group 1), underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull up. Sixty-seven patients (69.8%) classified as type II or III (group 2) underwent an extended gastrectomy. We compared the patients of both groups retrospectively for disease-free survival and postoperative complications. The general performance status of most patients was comparable in both groups and was assigned to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. Statistically significant differences between the groups were seen for the postoperative reintubation rate [group 1: 31.0% vs. group 2: 9.0% ( P  = 0.009)], median time for surgery [group 1: 6 (3.5–8.5) hours vs. group 2: 4.7 (2.2–11.5) hours ( P  = 0.001)], time in the intensive care unit [group 1: 6 (3–85) days vs. group 2: 3 (1–54) days ( P  = 0.001)], median hospitalization time [group 1: 23 (14–105) days vs. group 2: 18 (10–63) days ( P  = 0.018)]. No statistical difference was observed for the recurrence-free survival of 40% after 3 years ( P  = 0.311), the mortality rate, the morbidity rate ( P  = 0.108), surgical and respiratory complications, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage ( P  = 0.645). We conclude that in selected cases it may be possible to perform an extended gastrectomy for small type I cancers.     

The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks are the most feared surgical complications following resection of esophageal cancers. We aimed to develop a therapeutic algorithm for this complication characterized by high morbidity and mortality using our 20 years of experience and the published literature. A total of 354 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis due to esophageal carcinoma were evaluated retrospectively. The incidence for anastomotic leak was 15.5% ( n  = 90) in the cervical region and 4.2% ( n  = 264) in the thoracic region (mean: 7.1%). Cervical anastomotic leaks were detected after a mean period of 7.2 days following the procedure. Fourteen patients with cervical leaks were treated conservatively. Four out of 14 patients (28.6%) died due to sepsis and multi-organ failure related to fistula. Thoracic anastomotic leaks were detected after a mean period of 4.7 days following the procedure. Emergency reoperation, resection and reconstruction procedures were performed in one patient. Self-expanding metallic coated stents were placed at the anastomosis region in two patients. A more conservative approach was employed in other patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks. Six of them (46.2%) died due to fistula. General mortality rate was 37.0%, and the duration of hospitalization was 40.0 days for patients with anastomotic leaks. Cervical anastomotic leaks are more common than thoracic anastomotic leaks, but most of them are successfully treated with conservative approaches. Thoracic anastomotic leaks that in the past were related to high mortality rates despite conservative or surgical procedures might be successfully treated nowadays with the use of self-expanding metallic coated stents.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of isolated anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

The clinical course and outcome of isolated anastomotic leaks (IALs) after esophagectomy are significantly different from those of necrotic leaks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and long‐term outcome in patients with IALs after esophagectomy with reconstruction for esophageal cancer. A total of 663 patients underwent esophagectomy with esophageal reconstruction because of esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2010 at the Seoul Asan Medical Center. IALs occurred in 23 patients (3.5%). All patients with IAL were male, with a median age of 61 years. Patients with IAL were divided into three groups based on their clinical course. group A comprised patients who had definite clinical symptoms and/or signs indicating mediastinal contamination or leak before routine contrast esophagography was performed. Groups B and C comprised patients who had no definite clinical symptoms and/or signs of leaks before the routine contrast examination. Furthermore, group B contained those patients who resumed oral intake because no leak was found in the routine contrast examination and was diagnosed some days after resuming oral intake. Group C contained those patients who kept fasting because the leak was found in the routine contrast examination. The median follow‐up period was 30 months. The mean time to closure of the IAL was 70.1 ± 96.0 days (range 4–364). There was a 72.7% overall closure rate within 60 days. By univariate analysis, the mean time to closure of the IAL was found to be significantly longer for group A patients or in cases where the patients had an uncontained leak, leukocytosis, or empyema. However, there was no statistically significant differences in age, neoadjuvant treatment, site of anastomosis (cervical vs. thoracic), fever, or treatment of the leak. By multivariate analysis, group A was found to be an independent predictive factor for the time to closure of the IAL. Repeat contrast studies revealed no anastomotic leaks in 18 patients and the formation of contained fistula in four cases (excluding one patient who died in hospital). The four patients with a contained fistula showed no clinical symptoms or signs, and tolerated resumed oral intake. IALs were resolved in most cases with low leak‐related mortality, and resolution of the leaks occurred within 2 months in the majority of patients.     

Comparison of free jejunal graft with gastric pull-up reconstruction after resection of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal carcinoma

SUMMARY.  The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcomes of a gastric pull-up and free jejunal graft reconstruction after resection of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal carcinoma. Records of all patients who underwent esophageal resection for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus were reviewed. Reconstruction after esophagectomy was performed using the gastric pull-up ( n  = 38) or free jejunal graft ( n  = 14) techniques. The hypopharynx was the most common primary tumor site for the free jejunal graft group, whereas the gastric pull-up group had lesions more frequently in the cervical esophagus ( P  < 0.05). Both operative time and blood loss in the gastric pull-up group were significantly longer and excessive than those of the free jejunal graft group ( P  < 0.05). The graft survival rate was 95% (32/34) in the gastric pull-up group and 93% (13/14) for the free jejunal transfer group. The overall leakage rate was 1.9% (1/52). Three patients died (6%) in the postoperative period. There was no significant difference with regard to operative morbidity and mortality between the gastric pull-up group and free jejunal graft group. In conclusion, both free jejunal graft and gastric pull-up are safe and effective methods for the immediate restoration of alimentary continuity.     

Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic epidural analgesia

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. The most important predisposing factors for anastomotic leaks are ischemia of the gastric conduit and low blood oxygen content. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A thoracic surgery and anesthesia department in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred seven patients who underwent one-stage esophagectomy between 1998 and 2003. INTERVENTIONS: The effects of perioperative factors and postoperative complications on the incidence of anastomotic leakage were analyzed. Leakage was defined as an anastomotic disruption detected by an ionic x-ray contrast study and confirmed by upper endoscopy in the postoperative period. Analyzed factors included effective TEA placed before the surgical procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 23 patients (11%). This complication was associated with a significant increase in length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital (mean, 19 +/- 16 days vs 9 +/- 7 days [+/- SD], p = 0.008; and 43 +/- 27 days vs 23 +/- 11 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Mortality in patients presenting anastomotic leakage was 26%, compared with 5.4% in the remainder (p = 0.002). Factors independently associated with the incidence of leakage included estimated blood loss per milliliter during the surgical procedure (odds ratio [OR], 1.004; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 to 1.007), the cervical location for anastomosis (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 22.9), and the development of an ARDS in the postoperative period (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.6 to 176.5). Ninety-three patients benefited from an effective TEA for 4.4 +/- 0.8 days. The use of TEA was independently associated with a decrease in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective study suggest that TEA is associated with a decrease in occurrence of anastomotic leakage.     

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify variables associated with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and established a tool for anastomotic leakage prediction.MethodsTwenty-six preoperative and postoperative variables were retrospectively collected from esophageal cancer patients who were treated with radical esophagectomy from January 2018 to June 2020 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. SPSS Version 23.0 and Empower Stats software were used for establishing a nomogram after screening relevant variables by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses. The established nomogram was identified by depicting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curve, which was verified by 1,000 bootstrap resamples method.ResultsA total of 604 eligible esophageal cancer patients were included, of which 51 (8.4%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that smoking, anastomotic location, anastomotic technique, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and ASA score were independent risks of anastomotic leakage. The area under curve (AUC) of ROC in the established nomogram was 0.764 (95% CI, 0.69–0.83). The internal validation confirmed that the nomogram had a great discrimination ability (AUC =0.766). Depicted calibration curve demonstrated a well-fitted prediction and observation probability. In addition, the decision curve analysis concluded that the newly established nomogram is significant for clinical decision-making.ConclusionsThis nomogram provided the individual prediction of anastomotic leakage for esophageal cancer patients after surgery, which might benefit treatment results for patients and clinicians, as well as pre-and postoperative intervention strategy-making.     

Application of mechanical dilatation of the pyloric sphincter in esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of additional intraoperative mechanical dilatation of the pyloric sphincter in order to prevent early postoperative gastric retention after esophagectomy using the stomach as substitute for esophageal carcinoma patients. Between October 2001 and May 2002, 32 consecutive esophageal carcinoma patients were treated with esophagectomy combined with additional intraoperative mechanical dilatation of pyloric sphincter (trial group). Another 30 patients underwent esophagectomy without additional intraoperative mechanical dilatation of the pyloric sphincter (control group). Both groups were compared in the following aspects: amount of postoperative GI drainage, time of flatus, intrathoracic gastric fluid retention and other surgical related complications. The amount of GI drainage in the trial group was significantly less than that in the control group (p < 0.05), and time of anal exsufflation was 1 to 2 days. X-ray demonstrated only 0 to 25% of intrathoracic gastric fluid retention and no related complications such as anastomotic leakage, so the patients in the trial group suffered less gastric reflux. Additional intraoperative mechanical dilatation of the pyloric sphincter in radical esophagectomy can accelerate gastric emptying, the recovery of gastric-intestinal function and obviously decrease the occurrence of early postoperative gastric retention and related complications. This method does have the advantages of ease of performance, confirmed effectiveness and safety. It can be utilized in radical esophagectomy through any approach of thoracotomy.     

Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis

SUMMARY.   Trans-hiatal esophagectomy with a hand-sewn anastomosis was for 2 decades the preferred approach in our institution for patients with esophageal cancer. In our experience, this anastomotic technique was associated with a 12% leak rate and a 48% rate of stricture requiring dilatation. We sought to determine if a side-to-side intra-thoracic anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of anastomotic stricture and leak. Thirty-three consecutive patients with distal esophageal cancer or Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia underwent a trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic anastomosis. The overall morbidity was 27%, with no anastomotic stricture or leaks. One patient died (3%). The median time to the resumption of an oral diet was 7 days (range 5–28), and the median length of stay in hospital was 9 days (range 6–45). Trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis is safe and it is associated with a very low rate of anastomotic complications. We consider this to be the procedure of choice for patients with distal esophageal cancers.     

Endoscopic treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by using silicone-covered, self-expanding polyester stents

BACKGROUND: Surgery, as well as conservative treatment, in patients with clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks often is associated with poor results and carries a high morbidity and mortality. The successful treatment of esophageal anastomotic insufficiencies and perforations when using covered, self-expanding metallic stents is described. METHODS: The feasibility and the outcome of endoscopic treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages when using silicone-covered self-expanding polyester stents were investigated. Twelve consecutive patients presented with clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leak caused by resection of an epiphrenic diverticulum (n = 1), esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (n = 9), or gastrectomy for gastric cancer (n = 2), were endoscopically treated in our department. The extent of the dehiscences ranged from about 20% to 70% of the anastomotic circumference. After endoscopic lavage and debridement of the leakage at 2-day intervals (mean duration, 8.6 days), a large-diameter polyester stent (Polyflex; proximal/distal diameters 25/21 mm) was placed to seal the leakage. Simultaneously, the periesophageal mediastinum was drained by chest drains. OBSERVATIONS: All 12 patients were successfully treated endoscopically without the need for reoperation. A complete closure of the leakage was obtained in 11 of 12 patients after stent removal (median time to stent retrieval, 4 weeks, range 2-8 weeks). In one patient, a persistent leak was sealed endoscopically after stent removal by using 3 clips. Distal stent migration was obtained in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of silicone-covered self-expanding polyester stents seems to be a successful minimally invasive treatment option for clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks.     

Albert-Lembert versus hybrid-layered suture in hand sewn end-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resection

Background

Hand sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA) is regarded as preferred technique by surgeons after esophagectomy. However, considering the anastomotic leakage and stricture, the optimal technique for performing this anastomosis is still under debate.

Methods

Between November 2010 and September 2012, 230 patients who underwent esophagectomy with hand sewn end-to-end (ETE) CEGA for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were analyzed retrospectively, including 111 patients underwent Albert-Lembert suture anastomosis and 119 patients underwent hybrid-layered suture anastomosis. Anastomosis construction time was recorded during operation. Anastomotic leakage was recorded through upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast examination. Anastomotic stricture was recorded during follow up.

Results

The hybrid-layered suture was faster than Albert-Lembert suture (29.40±1.24 min vs. 33.83±1.41 min, P=0.02). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 7.82%, the leak rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (3.36% vs. 12.61%, P=0.01). The overall anastomotic stricture rate was 9.13%, the stricture rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (5.04% vs. 13.51%, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Hand sewn ETE CEGA with hybrid-layered suture is associated with lower anastomotic leakage and stricture rate compared to hand sewn ETE CEGA with Albert-Lembert suture.     

Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

AIM: To update our experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 445 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy between January 2009 and July 2015 at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and used 103 patients who underwent open McKeown esophagectomy in the same period as controls. Among 375 patients who underwent total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, 180 in the early period were chosen for the study of learning curve of total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. These 180 minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomies performed by five surgeons were divided into three groups according to time sequence as group 1 (n = 60), group 2 (n = 60) and group 3 (n = 60).RESULTS: Patients who underwent total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than patients who underwent hybrid minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy or open McKeown esophagectomy (100 mL vs 300 mL vs 200 mL, P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in operation time, number of harvested lymph nodes, or postoperative morbidity including incidence of pulmonary complication and anastomotic leak between total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, hybrid minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and open McKeown esophagectomy groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year survival between these three groups (60.5% vs 47.9% vs 35.6%, P = 0.735). Patients in group 1 had significantly longer duration of operation than those in groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, or postoperative morbidity including incidence of pulmonary complication and anastomotic leak between groups 1, 2 and 3.CONCLUSION: Total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss and comparable short term and long term survival compared with hybrid minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy or open Mckeown esophagectomy. At least 12 cases are needed to master total minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a high volume center.     

Intrathoracic supercharge technique for esophageal reconstruction using colon interposition via a retrosternal route

Currently, when the colon is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy, the supercharge technique is occasionally employed. At our institution, we perform esophagectomy using a procedure in which the laparoscopic transhiatal approach and digestive reconstruction precede the specimen resection. In addition, a retrosternal route is selected for reconstruction. We have devised an intrathoracic supercharge technique for this type of esophagectomy. Two patients whose stomachs were not available for reconstruction underwent subtotal esophagectomy with this supercharge technique. In these cases, the right-side colon was pulled up via a retrosternal route for reconstruction, and anastomoses were performed between the ileocolic artery and right internal thoracic artery, and between the ileocolic vein and superior vena cava, without microsurgery in the pleural space after removing the esophagus. This supercharge technique has the advantage of being less cumbersome, and we consider it to be suitable for esophageal reconstruction.     

Clinical application of gastrointestinal decompression in anastomotic fistula after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

AbstractCervical anastomotic fistula is one of the most common complications after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, leading to septic shock and even death. It is therefore very important to provide effective symptom management after diagnosis of anastomotic fistula. Placing the gastrointestinal decompression tube beside the anastomotic site and connecting the tube to a gastrointestinal decompression disk could support the prevention and treatment of anastomotic fistula after surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.Thirty-eight patients with anastomotic fistula after undergoing McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in our hospital from April 2017 to January 2021 were divided equally into control and observation groups according to the gastrointestinal decompression method used. Gastrointestinal decompression tubes were placed 45 to 50 cm from the incisors in the control group or 25 to 30 cm from the incisors in the observation group. The treatment efficacy was compared between the 2 groups.The drainage time, length of hospital stay after anastomotic fistula detection, and fistula healing time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < .05 for all).Placing the gastrointestinal decompression tube connected to a gastrointestinal decompression disk next to the anastomotic site is a simple procedure and may significantly improve the drainage time, length of hospital stay, and fistula healing time of patients who develop anastomotic fistula resulting from McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.     

A video demonstration of the Li’s anastomosis—the key part of the “non-tube no fasting” fast track program for resectable esophageal carcinoma

The main obstacle of fast track surgery for esophagectomy is early oral feeding. The main concern of early oral feeding is the possibility of increasing the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Dr. Yin Li used the Li’s anastomosis to ensure oral feeding at will the first day after esophagectomy. This safe and efficient anastomosis method significantly reduced the anastomotic leak rate, the number of post-operative days and stricture. Importantly, the “non-tube no fasting” fast track program for esophageal cancer patients was conducted smoothly with Li’s anastomosis. This article was focused on the surgical procedure of Li’s anastomosis.