Norplant as a Contraceptive Device in Enugu, Eastern Nigeria

This paper is an evaluation of acceptability and use-experience with the contraceptive device Norplant at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Eastern Nigeria. Over a period of 36 months, 173 women (8% of the clinic population) accepted the implant. Use of Norplant was concentrated among high-parity women, and the proportion of Norplant users was highest among women aged 30–34 years. Comparing Norplant and IUD users, we found Norplant users to be significantly less highly educated with <1% of Norplant users having tertiary education compared to 25% of new IUD users. The continuation rate with Norplant was 89% at three years, suggesting this method has the potential for improving the low contraceptive prevalence in this region.     

NorplantR contraceptive subdermal implants: Two-year experience in Singapore

Norplant contraceptive implants are Silastic containing levonorgestrel implants. This study describes our two-year experience with 100 acceptors of Norplant implants in Singapore. No pregnancies occurred during the first two years of use. Desire for planned pregnancy and disruption of menstrual rhythm were the two main reasons for twenty implant removals during the two years. The continuation rate at the end of two years was 79%. The post-removal conception rate in women desiring pregnancy was 90% at the end of one year. It thus appears that the Norplant contraceptive system offers a highly effective, acceptable, reversible and safe method of contraception.     

The introduction of Norplant in Cambodia through the private sector

The objectives of this study are to determine whether Norplant would be an acceptable contraceptive method for Cambodian women, given its technology and the socio-cultural context, and whether it can be delivered by a private sector clinic with good quality care. This is a prospective cohort study of the first 966 acceptors. It was found the one-year continuation rate was 90.5%, there were no pregnancies and client satisfaction was high. In general, Norplant was delivered with high quality of care. Findings indicate that Norplant suits the contraceptive needs of many Cambodian women and is appropriate for their socio-cultural context. Norplant can be introduced, with high quality care, in a private clinic in a developing country.     

A five-year clinical evaluation of NORPLANT contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors

A non-comparative study of the Norplant contraceptive subdermal implant system was conducted in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The study was designed to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy, safety and overall acceptability of Norplant implants. Six hundred women were enrolled in the clinical trial, which began in 1985 at three study sites. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months after Norplant implant insertion, and every six months thereafter until removal or at the end of five years. There were no post-insertion pregnancies during Norplant implant use in this study. After five years of Norplant implant use, there was no clinically significant change in body weight, systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Less than 3% of the women ever reported having any significant medical problems such as migraine, respiratory or cardiac problems during the study. The gross cumulative continuation rate was 41.2 per 100 women at the end of five years. The two most frequently reported reasons for discontinuation during the study were menstrual problems and desired pregnancy. Of the women who completed the five-year user satisfaction questionnaire, the majority of the women (86.3%) planned to continue using contraception after study completion. Of these women, approximately one-third said they planned to use another Norplant set. The findings presented suggest that the Norplant system is a highly effective, safe and acceptable method among Bangladeshi women.     

Norplant皮下埋植避孕150例临床研究

目的:探讨Norplant皮下埋植避孕的效果。方法:选择Norplant皮下埋植避孕妇女150例作为治疗组,以宫内节育环避孕妇女150例作为对照组,比较两组使用情况、避孕效果和月经紊乱情况。结果:5年后随访,治疗组因不适取出32例,取出率为21.33%,其余118例全部达到避孕效果,有效率100.00%;期间出现月经紊乱58例,发生率为49.15%;对照组因不适取出或自行脱出10例,取出率为6.67%,其余140例中达到避孕效果115例,有效率82.14%,出现月经紊乱33例,发生率为23.57%。两组避孕效果、月经紊乱和不适失败率比较均具有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论:对生育期要求避孕妇女行皮下Norplant埋植避孕手术可达到有效的避孕效果,但月经紊乱发生率相对较高,宫内节育环避孕有效率较皮下Norplant埋植避孕手术低,但月经紊乱发生率亦较治疗组低。使用Norplant埋植避孕如何减少月经紊乱,仍是今后值得探讨的一个问题。     

国产18甲基炔诺酮皮下埋植剂的临床研究

666例40岁以下健康育龄妇女所参加的前瞻性多中心研究,经过一年观察,国产组333例中无妊娠,对照的Norplant-1组发生1例妊娠,妊娠率0.3/100妇女,二组的续用率同为94/100妇女。     

WHO 86925 Norplant上市后监测(中国部分)

本课题研究目的是对Norplant皮下埋植剂潜在副作用进行监测,以进一步证实其安全性。对使用Norplant和IUD或绝育术的妇女进行比较随访研究。每半年随访一次,详细记录所有健康情况,共随访5年。随访率达99.9％。结果:Norplant组及对照组IUD和绝育术的5年继续使用率分别为76.25、80.89、98.10/100使用者。Norplant的5年累计妊娠率为0.6/100使用者,远低于IUD的8.11/100使用者,宫外孕发生率为0.46/1000妇女年,低于IUD的1.24/1000妇女年,但宫外孕和妊娠之比在Norplant组为31.6:100,远高于IUD的6.7:100,如发生妊娠,要警惕宫外孕的可能。月经问题是Norplant的主要终止使用原因,但使用5年者,其血红蛋白均值上升,和接收时相比P<0.001,而IUD使用5年者,其血红蛋白均值下降,和接收时相比P<0.01。在观察5年中胆囊炎胆石症、纤维囊性乳腺病在Norplant使用者中的发病率高于对照组,P<0.05～0.001,但未发现重大健康问题。Norplant使用5年是安全的。     

Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States

BACKGROUND: This study examines contraceptive discontinuation due to method dissatisfaction among women in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The study population, drawn from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, consisted of 6724 women (15-44 years of age) who had ever used a reversible contraceptive method. We first estimated the overall proportion of women who had ever discontinued their contraceptive due to dissatisfaction. We then calculated method-specific discontinuation risks due to dissatisfaction and analyzed the reasons for dissatisfaction given by women who had ever stopped using Norplant, Depo-Provera, oral contraceptives or condoms. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of women had ever discontinued at least one method because they were unsatisfied with it. Dissatisfaction-related discontinuation risks varied widely by method: the diaphragm and cervical cap showed the highest proportions of such discontinuation (52%), followed by long-acting hormonal methods (42%). Oral contraceptives were associated with an intermediate risk of dissatisfaction-related discontinuation (29%), while condoms had the lowest risk (12%). CONCLUSION: A broader understanding of women's concerns and experiences using contraception could help health care providers redesign counseling strategies to improve contraceptive continuation.     

Ten years of experience with Norplant implantation in southern Thailand

PURPOSE: This study investigated clinical and contraceptive characteristics of a group of southern Thai women who had two consecutive Norplant implantations at Songklanagarind Hospital. METHODS: Seventy reinsertions were performed from 251 original Norplant implantations during the years 1986-1996. Four women had an exposed capsule within 3 months after reinsertion, and two of them subsequently had to have the capsule removed due to infection. RESULTS: Following implantation, the recipients had gradually increased body mass index and systolic blood pressure, which returned to baseline 6 months after discontinuance after 10 years of implantation. Long-term continuation rates were 76.7% and 74.0% at the end of the first and second 5-year periods, respectively. CONCLUSION: The failure rate was 1.8% during the second period compared to 1.1% during the first period.     

皮下埋植避孕剂用于临床避孕的疗效研究

目的:对皮下埋植剂避孕剂避孕的临床疗效及安全性进行研究,对其临床应用的前景进行展望。方法:对2007年4月～2008年4月在东台市计划生育指导站实行避孕术的妇女进行回顾性分析,选取98例符合标准者,观察组使用皮下埋植避孕剂进行避孕,对照组使用宫内节育器进行避孕。对两组研究对象避孕效果、术后阴道出血、月经情况、放置率、患者满意率等临床数据进行比较。结果:术后对患者随访5年,观察组有效率为97.9%,较对照组91.3%有优势。观察组出现不良反应4例,不良反应率为8.5%;对照组出现不良反应11例,不良发应率为23.9%,观察组不良反应率低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组在放置率及患者满意率明显优于对照组。结论:皮下埋植避孕剂在临床避孕的使用中,具有避孕率高,不良发应少,放置率高等优势,受到临床医患的认可,适于推广使用。     

国产皮下埋植剂多中心研究

目的:评价两种国产皮下埋植剂的避孕效果、副反应和继续使用率。方法:分两期进行。第一期为国产Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型皮下埋植剂与Norplant进行前瞻性临床对比研究,各100例,共300例。第二期为国产皮下埋植剂扩大临床应用,接受合格对象Ⅰ型999例,Ⅱ型998例,共1997例。随访5年。结果:5年随访率为99.5％。第一期国产Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型皮下埋植剂和Norplant的5年累计妊娠率分别为0/百妇女、1.0/百妇女、0/百妇女,5年继续使用率分别为77％、80％、80％,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。主要副反应为月经紊乱,月经卡分析显示3种埋植剂的出血模型相似。第二期国产Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型皮下埋植剂5年累计妊娠率分别为0.20/百妇女,2.10/百妇女,5年继续使用分别为84.47％、82.28％。使用埋植剂6个月Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型月经问题主诉发生率分别为50.88％、57.16％,差异有显著意义(P<0.01),但随着使用时间延长,月经紊乱主诉发生率逐渐下降,两组间无差异。结论:5年研究表明两种国产皮下埋植剂的避孕效果、副反应发生率和继续使用率与Norplant相似,也是一种高效,长效的避孕制剂。国产皮下埋植剂Ⅱ型使用至第5年避孕失败率明显增加,建议国产Ⅱ型皮下埋植剂使用期限在3～4年为好。     

Post-marketing surveillance of Norplant contraceptive implants: I. Contraceptive efficacy and reproductive health

The subject of this study to examine the safety and contraceptive efficacy of Norplant, we undertook a 5-year study of follow-up of women initiating use of Norplant, intrauterine device (IUD) or sterilization in eight developing countries. Women attending family clinics were enrolled if they consented and were medically eligible to use Norplant, IUD, or female sterilization. Women who chose to initiate use of IUDs or surgical sterilization served as controls and were frequency matched in 5-year age-bands with women who chose to use Norplant. At admission women had a physical examination, and their medical histories, demographic, and socio-economic characteristics were recorded. Follow-up visits were scheduled in the first 6 weeks after admission and semi-annually thereafter for 5 years irrespective of change of contraceptive method. Incidence rate ratios of health events were estimated for initial and current contraceptive method use. This paper reports reproductive health events and contraceptive efficacy. Altogether, 7,977 women initiating use of Norplant, 6,625 of IUD, and 1,419 of surgical sterilization were admitted. Their mean ages at initiation were 28.5, 28.5, and 29.6 years, respectively. More than 99% were married or cohabiting, and parous. Five-year follow-up was completed by 94.6% of the women. By the end of 5 years, the mean duration of first segment use per initiator was 4.16 years for Norplant, 4.10 years for IUDs, and 4.96 years for sterilization accounting for 39,337 woman-years for Norplant, 31,915 for IUDs, and 7,071 for sterilization. The study accumulated 78,323 woman-years of observation. Pearl pregnancy rates for Norplant, copper IUDs and female sterilization were 0.27, 0.88, and 0.17 per 100 woman-years, respectively. Users of Norplant, copper IUDs, and sterilization had rates of ectopic pregnancy of 0.30, 0.68, and 0.13 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively. Major health events related to the reproductive system were rare. Rates of acute PID were significantly lower among Norplant users than IUD users (p = 0.004). The rate of ovarian enlargement was significantly higher in Norplant users than controls (p <0.001), but not rates of hospitalization for this condition. Vaginitis and vaginal discharge, and low abdominal pain were significantly less frequent in Norplant users than in the other groups. Bleeding disturbances were more frequent among Norplant users than controls but not anemia. The study confirms the high contraceptive efficacy of Norplant, copper IUDs, and female sterilization. The incidence rates of major reproductive health problems were low. There was no significant excess of serious reproductive morbidity among users of Norplant compared to users of IUDs and sterilization.     

Norplant contraceptive implants: a new contraceptive for women

This article summarizes current knowledge on the mechanism of action, side effects, and effectiveness of Norplant contraceptive implants. The most common side effect of the implant method is its disruption of the menstrual cycle, especially in the 1st few months of use. Long intervals without frank bleeding may occur and be misinterpreted as pregnancy in women who have not been counseled about this possibility. The average annual continuation rate was 84/100 in a study of 324 women from several countries who were followed for 5 years after Norplant implantation. The net cumulative pregnancy rate for the 5-year study period was 0.6/100. Reasons for method termination included menstrual problems, other medical problems (headache, depression, fatique), planning pregnancy, and other personal reasons (change in marital status, change in residence). To provide training for doctors, nurses, and counselors, the Population Council has established a network of 5 training institutions. Within the next few years, drug regulatory agencies are expected to approve use of Norplant implants in many countries. Although at present the method is available only in Finland and Sweden, Thailand and Indonesia are considering the method and clinical trials are underway in India, China, Brazil, and the US. A consulting committee of the World Health Organization has concluded that Norplant implants are a suitable contraceptive method for use in family planning programs.     

Efficacy and continuation rates of Norplant in Pakistan.

A total of 265 women who had the Norplant system inserted were followed for 5 years. The present study is based on 11,435 women-months of use, describing the continuation rates and efficacy of Norplant among these women. The 5-year cumulative continuation rate was 45.7 per 100 continuing users. The continuation rates were age-dependent. The women > or = 35 years of age consistently maintained higher continuation rates at all time intervals as compared with those of younger women. During 5 years of follow-up, five women became pregnant. Three pregnancies occurred in year 2, one in year 3, and one in year 5. The 5-year cumulative pregnancy rate was 2.5 per 100 continuing users. The weight of the user did not influence the pregnancy rate. The continuation rates, as well as the pregnancy rates, are comparable to those reported from other countries in the region.     

Use of Norplant implants in a New York City clinic population

Two-hundred-eight women attending family planning clinics in New York City who received the Norplant contraceptive system during the first sixteen months of Norplant implants insertions were evaluated. Within this clinic population, Norplant implants were a popular contraceptive choice and were removed from 64 of the 208 recipients. Reasons for removal included bleeding, weight gain, and headache, and were consistent with those found in the clinical trials. Prior satisfaction with oral contraceptives did not predict success or failure with Norplant implants. The rate of follow-up visits to the family planning clinics was low. However, evidence exists that these women did not lose contact with the medical center and continued to receive health care.     

皮下埋植剂Norplant避孕5年的应用观察

本文从1988年10月3日～1994年5月31日观察接受Norplant Ⅰ型皮下埋植剂避孕满5年的妇女400例。5年累积妊娠率0.52/100接受者,其中1例宫内妊娠发生在使用52个月时,1例左卵巢妊娠发生在使用36个月时,可能与其患肺结核使用利福平治疗7个月而未加用其他避孕措施有关。月经紊乱是主要终止原因,5年中因月经问题取出埋植剂117例,占总取出数的82.63％,因其他医学问题取出25例,占17.12％,5年累积续用率为64.76/100接受者。835次埋植术及取出术均无伤口感染。观察结果表明Norplant皮下埋植避孕是一种长效、高效、安全可逆的避孕方法。     

Post-marketing surveillance of Norplant((R)) contraceptive implants: II. Non-reproductive health(1)

This controlled cohort study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Norplant contraceptive implants in developing countries. Women initiating Norplant implants were index subjects and women initiating intrauterine devices (IUDs) or surgical sterilization were controls. Consenting participants at 32 clinics in eight developing countries were admitted and followed-up every 6 months for 5 years. Major and less serious health events during follow-up were recorded. Incidence rate ratios of health events adjusted for clinic were estimated for initial and current method use. This paper reports non-reproductive health events. The study involved 7,977 women initiating use of Norplant, 6,625 of IUD, and 1,419 of sterilization. Five years follow-up was completed for 94.6% of the women. The study accumulated 78,323 woman-years of observation. The initial method chosen accounted for 84.4% or more of observed woman-years in users of Norplant, IUD, or sterilization. Twenty-two of the recorded 34 deaths were due to accidents, suicide or homicide. Few deaths or major health events were due to cancer or acute cardiovascular diseases and were not associated with the contraceptive method used. The incidence rates of major health events were low and with two exceptions, there was no significant excess risk of serious morbidity for Norplant users compared with controls; among Norplant initiators gallbladder disease occurred at an incidence rate of 1.5 per 1,000 woman-years and was weakly associated with use of Norplant (rate ratio 1.52 [95% C.I. 1.02, 2.27]). For current Norplant users compared to controls, the rate ratio of a combined variable of hypertension and borderline hypertension was significantly elevated (1.81, [1.12, 2.92]). The occurrence of less serious health events was also low and several of them were significantly more often reported among Norplant users. Headache-migraine, weight gain, mood disturbances, pruritus, eczema, and acne had incidence rates among Norplant users of 11.5, 4.5, 2.8, 1.5, 1.4, and 0.9 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively, and were significantly higher than in controls. Respiratory health problems, nonspecific symptoms, and several ill-defined conditions were also significantly more often reported for Norplant users, but some of the excess incidence may be attributable to reporting and detection bias. The study confirms the safety with respect to serious disease of Norplant, IUDs, and sterilization.     

Norplant® implants in the UK: First year continuation and removals

Norplant^® implants are a long-term, reversible hormonal method of contraception consisting of six flexible capsules placed subdermally in the inner aspect of the nondominant arm. Norplant implants were introduced into the UK in October 1993 although they had been used previously in some countries for up to ten years. The insertion and removal techniques require skills training and therefore it is important to assess early experience with the method.

This survey looks at the first year continuation rate of Norplant implants in the UK from a total of 2,129 insertions. From these insertions, 133 removals were documented and described, using a checklist of features. The continuation rate for Norplant implants use was 96.5% at six months and 85.2% at one year. None of the reasons for discontinuation were of a serious nature. The most common reason given was menstrual change (50.4% of all removals, 3% of all women included in the survey), which is in line with other reported studies.

Of the removals, 71.5% were reported as straightforward (of these 65.6% were completed within 20 minutes). In the first year of use, Norplant implants were associated with high continuation rates and the removal procedure was, in the majority of cases, completely straight-forward.     

Evaluating contraceptive choice through the method-mix approach. An Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) task force study

The method-mix approach was used to evaluate informed contraceptive choices in the present study. A total of 8,077 potential clients were given a balanced presentation of all available contraceptive methods in the national program, ie, the CuT 200 intrauterine device (IUD), low-dose combined oral pills (OC), condom, and sterilization (female/male) along with a new method, Norplant(R).(1) The majority of women opted for spacing methods; among them, the IUD was preferred by about 60% of clients, followed by condoms (9%), OC (6%), and Norplant (5%). Sterilization, mainly female, was accepted by about 17% of the women making an informed choice.The economic status of couples did not influence the contraceptive choices, as all the methods were offered free of cost in the present study, which is the current practice in the national program. Illiterate women more often accepted sterilization (about 25%) than did literate women (15%). This is because illiterate women had more children; about 30% of illiterate women had three or more children, as opposed to 16.2% of literate women. However, literacy status did not influence the choice of any specific spacing method. The study also revealed that, by encouraging potential clients to make an informed choice, they could override the provider's bias while accepting a particular type of spacing method. This is evident from the observation that Norplant was the first choice of the provider for 35% of the women, whereas only 5% of women preferred and accepted Norplant. The present study stresses an urgent need to promote the practice of informed choices in the national program with a variety of contraceptive options-especially, spacing methods for improving contraceptive prevalence and reproductive health in the country.     

Phase II randomized comparative clinical trial of Norplant (six capsules) with Norplant-2 (two covered rods) subdermal implants for long-term contraception: report of a 24-month study. National Programme of Research in Human Reproduction

In a randomized clinical study, contraceptive efficacy and bleeding patterns were studied in a group of healthy, regularly menstruating, non-lactating women (n = 84) using two 4.4 cm covered silastic rods containing levonorgestrel, Norplant(R)-2, and compared with another group of women (n = 88) using six 3.4 cm capsules also containing levonorgestrel, Norplant(R). The silastic rods or capsules were placed subdermally in the medial aspect of the upper arm. No method failure was reported up to 24 months of use in this study with either of the device. The bleeding pattern was also similar for both devices as indicated by average episode length, number of bleeding runs and number of spotting days. The continuation rates with both devices were over 80 per 100 users at the end of 12 months and over 65 per 100 users at the end of 24 months. Discontinuations due to expulsion of the device, bleeding problems or personal reasons were few and similar for both devices. The results suggest that silastic-covered rods, Norplant(R)-2, which are comparatively easier to insert and remove and have similar clinical effect, could replace capsules, Norplant(R), as a long-term reversible subdermal contraceptive.