Predictors of physician's smoking cessation advice

OBJECTIVES--To determine the percentage of smokers reporting that a physician had ever advised them to smoke less or to stop smoking, and the effect of time, demographics, medical history, and cigarette dependence on the likelihood that respondents would state that a physician had ever advised them to stop smoking. DESIGN AND SETTING--Data were collected from the Stanford Five-City Project, a communitywide health education intervention program. The two treatment and three control cities were located in northern and central California. As there was no significant difference between treatment and control cities regarding cessation advice, data were pooled for these analyses. PARTICIPANTS--There were five cross-sectional, population-based Five-City Project surveys (conducted in 1979-1980, 1981-1982, 1983-1984, 1985-1986, and 1989-1990); these surveys randomly sampled households and included all residents aged 12 to 74 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Improved smoking advice rates over time in all towns was an a priori hypothesis. RESULTS--Of the 2710 current smokers, 48.8% stated that their physicians had ever advised them to smoke less or stop smoking. Respondents were more likely to have been so advised if they smoked more cigarettes per day, were surveyed later in the decade, had more office visits in the last year, or were older. In 1979-1980, 44.1% of smokers stated that they had ever been advised to smoke less or to quit by a physician, vs 49.8% of smokers in 1989-1990 (P less than .07). Only 3.6% of 1672 ex-smokers stated that their physicians had helped them to quit. CONCLUSION--These findings suggest that physicians still need to increase smoking cessation counseling to all patients, particularly adolescents and other young smokers, minorities, and those without cigarette-related disease.     

Role of the physician in screening for carriers of Tay-Sachs disease.

A screening test for carriers of Tay-Sachs disease has been available in Toronto for more than 6 years. In that time more than 11 000 Jewish residents have been tested. Most had requested testing after hearing about the screening program from friends or the media; few had been advised by their physicians to be tested. To sample the attitudes of physicians in Toronto towards carrier screening, we studied questionnaire responses of 42 physicians whose practices were composed largely of Jewish patients. Only 31% regularly advised their young adult Jewish patients to have a carrier screening test but 76% said they had patients who asked if they should be tested. Of the 14 (33%) who had had one or more patients with Tay-Sachs disease 6 did not advise carrier testing. There was a positive correlation between specialty training and support for the screening program. Methods for increasing physician advocacy of these programs are discussed.     

Patients' evaluation of outpatient medical care

150 patients attending an outpatient clinic at the University of Oklahoma Hospital over a 5-week period were asked whether the clinic care they were receiving was better than, as good as, or worse than the care they had received from local physicians. The patients were drawn from the general medicine, cardiology, and oncology-hematology units and tended to be elderly and chronically ill. Most of the patients viewed favorably the care they received in the medical outpatient clinics. 65% reported they had experienced pain or discomfort in the week prior to their visit, but there was no association between these factors and degree of satisfaction with clinic care. Patients averaged about 30 minutes with the physician, and 80% felt the doctor adequately explained their medical condition to them. Patients who rated the clinic care as being worse than the care of private practitioners felt that their condition was not adequately explained. When asked to define a "good doctor," patient responses were "interest in the patient," "skilled and thorough," and "explains things to you." Characteristics identified as being most important in a "good clinic" were; good doctors, well-trained staff, and information from doctors. Of all the factors examined, the one associated most directly with patient satisfaction was personal interest on the part of the physician in the patients.     

A randomized trial of a family physician intervention for smoking cessation

We assessed the impact of three conditions on one-year smoking cessation rates. Physicians in 70 community general practices were randomly allocated by practice to one of three groups: In the usual care group, smoking patients were to receive the care they normally would receive. In the gum only group, physicians were asked to speak to patients about smoking cessation and offer nicotine gum. In the gum plus group, physicians were trained in the experimental intervention. This intervention involved advice to stop smoking, the setting of a quit date, the offer of nicotine gum, and four follow-up visits. Smoking cessation was measured by self-report after one year and validated using saliva cotinine measures. Using a criterion of at least three months of abstinence, 8.8% of the patients of the trained physicians had stopped smoking at the one-year follow-up compared with 4.4% and 6.1% of the patients in the usual care and gum only groups, respectively.     

Study of smoking habits in hospital and attitudes of medical staff towards smoking.

Most hospital policies place little or no restriction on patients' smoking in hospital. In this study patients were surveyed to determine if they smoked and if their doctors advised or ordered them to stop smoking in hospital. As well, the smoking habits and attitudes towards smoking of the medical staff and other hospital workers were explored. Of 741 patients 37% were smokers, and those who responded fully to a questionnaire 86% continued to smoke in hospital. Patients who were advised or ordered not to smoke (59%) were no more likely to stop smoking than those who were not so advised or ordered. Physicians were less likely to smoke than other hospital staff, and those who did smoke were much more likely not to smoke while in the hospital. Physicians appear to have a reasonable appreciation of the health hazards of smoking, and almost two thirds are in favour of stricter restrictions on patients' smoking in hospital. The ineffectiveness of their efforts is primarily due to hospital policies that are not in keeping with physicians' standards of practice and with established knowledge of the deleterious effects of smoking on health.     

Physicians and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. What patients think about human immunodeficiency virus in medical practice

Are patients concerned about going to a physician who is infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or one who is treating HIV-infected patients? To answer these questions, we surveyed a nationwide sample of 2000 interviews (response rate, 75%). Forty-five percent of all respondents believed that physicians who were HIV infected should not be allowed to continue to practice. More than half of those who had seen a physician in the past 5 years said they would change physicians if they knew their physician were HIV infected, while one fourth said they would seek care elsewhere if their physician were treating people with HIV disease. These data suggest that patients are concerned about HIV in their physicians' offices. The American Medical Association recommends that HIV-infected physicians continue to practice as long as there is no risk to their patients. Physicians and the public need to be educated about this policy and its appropriateness.     

Making the sale: communicating the importance of smoking cessation to pregnant patients

The risks that smoking pose to the pregnant patient and her fetus have been well established. Some women quit smoking upon learning they are pregnant, but most do not. Although a direct, succinct intervention by the physician has proven to be a critical initial step in helping the patient to quit smoking, some physicians are not taking advantage of this opportunity. This article provides data obtained from focus groups conducted with pregnant West Virginia smokers. These women spoke very candidly about their experiences with their providers. Chances for succeeding with helping a patient to quit smoking are likely to increase if physicians discuss smoking with their patients at each visit and if it is done in a constructive manner.     

Discrimination against gay, lesbian and bisexual family physicians by patients

BACKGROUND: Discrimination against gay, lesbian and bisexual (GLB) patients by physicians is well known. Discrimination against GLB physicians by their colleagues and superiors is also well known and includes harassment, denial of positions and refusal to refer patients to them. The purpose of this study was to identify and quantify the attitudes of patients toward GLB physicians. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with 500 randomly selected people living in a large urban Canadian city. Subjects were asked if they would refuse to see a GLB family physician and, if so, to describe the reason why. They were then given a choice of 6 reasons obtained from consultation with 10 GLB people and 10 heterosexual people. RESULTS: Of the 500 subjects 346 (69.2%) were reached and agreed to participate. Of the 346 respondents 41 (11.8%) stated that they would refuse to see a GLB family physician. The 2 most common reasons for the discrimination (prevalence rate more than 50%) were that GLB physicians would be incompetent and the respondent would feel "uncomfortable" having a GLB physician. Although more male than female respondents discriminated against GLB physicians, the difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of male and female respondents who discriminated increased with age (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The observed prevalence of patient discrimination against GLB family physicians is significant. The results suggest that the discrimination is based on emotional reasons and is not related to such factors as misinformation about STDs and fear of being thought of sexually. Therefore, educational efforts should be directed against general perceptions of homosexuality rather than targeting specific medical concerns.     

The role of deputizing agencies in the delivery of primary health care services.

When not available to their patients, family practitioners in large cities can "sign out" to deputizing agencies, which coordinate the activities of part-time physicians on call. The physicians making use of one such agency in Toronto appeared to be representative of family practitioners in the region. One thousand of their patients seen consecutively by one physician were asked a series of questions. The majority of the 811 evaluable patients were considered to have problems justifying an after-hours call, although 16% of the problems were of a trivial nature. However, almost half of the patients with trivial problems would have gone to the local emergency room, as would 85% of all the patients. Although virtually all (94%) of the visits with the elderly were justified, 34% of the patients in this age group said they probably or definitely would not have sought emergency room care if a physician had not been available. The use of deputizing agencies should reduce the overuse of emergency room facilities and provide optimal after-hours primary medical care.     

Smoking habits among senior high school students and related factors

The present study was conducted to provide baseline data for an anti-smoking educational program. Nineteen public senior high schools in a prefecture in Kyushu, Japan, participated in the study. In July 1982, unsigned self-administered questionnaires on smoking habits were answered by 4689 students--3088 males and 1601 females--during a homeroom under the supervision of their class teacher. The proportions of students who admitted that they had smoked cigarettes were 45.9% for males and 18.2% for females at the ordinary schools, and 78.1% for males at vocational schools. Eleven to twenty percent of male students had already smoked cigarettes in primary school. More male students in vocational schools had smoked than either male or female students in ordinary schools. Over 40% of vocational school students were regular smokers, in contrast to 11.8% for males and 3.4% for females at ordinary schools. It was also noted that the younger the students, the earlier the age at which they had smoked their first cigarette. The incidence of smoking at the primary school age appeared to be correlated with the incidence of smoking by a family member and at high school age with the incidence of smoking by a friend. Spending money and a friend who smoked were strongly associated with current smoking status of high school students, while parental smoking had a weak association. These results suggest the need for anti-smoking education beginning in a lower grade in primary school.     

The profile of the African smoker: the Ghana smoking studies

The prevalence of cigarette smoking in Ghana was assessed by examining the data on smoking from 2 World Health Organization sponsored studies of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. The 2 studies were the Civil Servants Hypertension Project, which surveyed a sample of approximately 20% of all civil servants and included 486 male and 202 female respondents, and the Mamprobi Survey, which sampled the general population and included 3745 respondents, aged 14-64 years. Additional data from 2 other studies was also examined. Overall, the studies found that the proportion of smokers in Ghana was small and that most of those who smoked were not heavy smokers. The smoking prevalence rate among civil servants was 32% for males and 5.9% for females. Among the respondents in the Mamprobi Survey, the respective rates were 24% and 0.8%. For those aged 15-19 years, the prevalence rates in the 2 studies ranged from 4.6%-7.8% for males and was 0.0% for females. In another recent study of 2493 respondents from the general population, the proportion of smokers was only 15.1%. The proportion of smokers was similar among those who earned low and high salaries. In the Civil Servants Study the mean number of cigaretters smoked/day among the civil servants was 7 for the males and 4.7 for the females. In the Mamprobi Survey, the respective mean numbers were 8.4 and 3.0. Among civil servants, professional and administratie personnel smoked an average of 12 cigarettes/day while lower salaried workers smoked an average of 7 cigarettes/day. Only 3.7% of all the smokers in the 2 studies combined smoked 20 or more cigarettes/day. All of the studies indicate that 97%-99% of those who smoked/used cigarettes. Among civil servants, 91% of the smokers and 60% of the nonsmokers used alcohol. The studies indicate that the typical smoker in Ghana is an urban male, between 20-29 years of age, who began smoking as an adolescent. He is just as likely to belong to a high income group as a low income group; however, if he belongs to the former group, he is more likely to smoke more than the average number of cigarettes/day. Available information on smoking should be used to launch a public health campaign to reduce smoking in Ghana. At the present time, only a minority of the population smokes, few individuals are heavy smokers, and teachers and educators are showing considerable interest in combating smoking. Currently, educated and professional groups have a relatively high proportion of smokers. If these groups can be motivated to stop smoking, they might serve as effective role models for other segments of the population. Factors which may increase the smoking problem in Ghana are the growing number of young people who smoke and the ambivalence of the government toward smoking. Voluntary organizations and health professionals should assume more active roles in educating the public about the hazards of smoking.     

Practice nurses and antismoking education

A questionnaire on antismoking activities and education was sent to 369 nurses in general practice. The response rate was 80%. Although most of the nurses sometimes advised patients about smoking, routine antismoking education occurred less frequently. Only a few regularly referred smokers to other agencies for help, recommended aids to stop smoking, or used antismoking literature. Although the nurses thought that they had an important role in helping smokers to give up, they expressed little confidence in their effectiveness, believing that advice from the general practitioner and the smoker's personal determination to give up have more impact. The nurses expressed a need for training in antismoking education. Seventy seven per cent were interested in attending seminars and listed information about smoking, techniques for stopping, and counselling skills as priorities. If practice nurses are to use opportunities in primary care to help smokers there is clearly a need to provide further training and to establish the effectiveness of nurses in their role as smoking educators.     

Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates. A randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Pneumococcal immunization rates for elderly and high-risk patients are only one third to one half the target rate of 60% established by the US Public Health Service. Limited or marginal literacy, which affects nearly 100 million Americans, especially the elderly, may contribute to these low rates of immunization. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of a simple, low-literacy educational tool enhances patient-physician dialogue about pneumococcal vaccination and increases rates of immunization. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial conducted between May and June of 1998. SETTING: Ambulatory care clinic of a 900-bed public teaching hospital serving a predominantly indigent, low-literate, African American, inner-city population. PARTICIPANTS: Of 433 patients who presented for routine primary care, had vaccine indications (age > or =65 years or chronic disease), and had not been previously vaccinated, 221 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 212 to the control group. Of the total patient population (mean age, 63 years), 280 (64.7%) had less than a high school education, 401 (92.6%) were African American, and 300 (69.3%) were female. INTERVENTION: One-page, low-literacy (below fifth-grade level) educational handout encouraging patients to "ask your doctor about the pneumonia shot" vs a control group (1 -page, low-literacy educational handout conveying information about nutrition). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaccination rates (documented by chart audit) of patients who received pneumococcal vaccination and rates of patients who self-reported having discussed vaccination with their physicians. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group were 4 times more likely to have discussed the pneumococcal vaccine with their physicians than patients in the control group (87/221 [39.4%] vs 21/212 [9.9%]; relative risk [RR], 3.97 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.71-5.83]), and were more than 5 times as likely to have received the pneumococcal vaccine than the control group (44/221 [19.9%] vs 8/212 [3.8%]; RR, 5.28 [95% CI, 2.80-9.93]). In a multivariate analysis controlling for race, sex, education, insurance status, age, level of physician training, health status, and vaccine indication, only assignment to the intervention group was statistically significantly related to the probability of being immunized or discussing the issue with their physicians (P<.001 for both trends). CONCLUSIONS: A simple, low-literacy educational tool increased pneumococcal vaccination rates and patient-physician discussions about the vaccine in an elderly, low-literate, indigent, minority population.     

Tobacco dependence curricula in US undergraduate medical education.

CONTEXT: Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States. And yet only 21% of practicing physicians claim they received adequate training to help their patients stop smoking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the content and extent of tobacco education and intervention skills in US medical schools' curricula. DESIGN: A survey with 13 multiple-response items on tobacco education. Survey questions were based on the recommendations of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Cancer Institute Expert Panel. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education included 4 of these items in a modified form on the 1997 annual questionnaire. SETTING: One hundred twenty-six US medical schools. PARTICIPANTS: Surveys were obtained from 122 associate deans for medical education (98.6%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Curriculum content in basic science and clinical science, elective or required clinical experience, hours of instruction, and resource materials. RESULTS: Inclusion of all 6 tobacco curricula content areas recommended by the National Cancer Institute and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research was higher in basic science (63/115 [54.8%]) than in clinical science (5/115 [4.4%]). Most medical schools (83/120 [69.2%]) did not require clinical training in smoking cessation techniques, while 23.5% (27/115) offered additional experience as an elective course. Thirty-one percent (32/102) of schools averaged less than 1 hour of instruction per year in smoking cessation techniques during the 4 years of medical school. A minority of schools reported 3 or more hours of clinical smoking cessation instruction in the third (14.7%) and fourth (4.9%) years. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of US medical school graduates are not adequately trained to treat nicotine dependence. The major deficit is the lack of smoking cessation instruction and evaluation in the clinical years. A model core tobacco curricula that meets national recommendations should be developed and implemented in all US medical schools.     

Cigar and pipe smoking and myocardial infarction in young men

The effect of cigar and pipe smoking on the risk of myocardial infarction was evaluated in an interview study of 572 men with non-fatal first myocardial infarctions and 934 hospital controls. The study was conducted in the north eastern United States from 1980 to 1983. All subjects were 40-54 years of age, and none had smoked cigarettes for at least two years. Among men who had never smoked cigarettes the relative risk of myocardial infarction for those who smoked at least five cigars a day, compared with not smoking cigars and pipes and allowing for other risk factors, was estimated to be 1.7 (95% confidence interval 0.6 to 4.8). Among ex-smokers of cigarettes the corresponding estimate for those who smoked at least five cigars a day was 4.5 (2.2 to 9.2). The estimates for men who smoked fewer cigars, or pipes, were closer to 1.0 and not significant. Men who stop smoking cigarettes and switch to at least five cigars a day apparently continue to have an increased risk of myocardial infarction, possibly because they continue to inhale the smoke.     

Is telephone counselling a useful addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the incremental efficacy of telephone counselling by a nurse in addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking. METHODS: The trial was conducted at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. A total of 396 volunteers who smoked 15 or more cigarettes daily were randomly assigned to either of 2 groups: usual care (control group) and usual care plus telephone counselling (intervention group); the groups were stratified by sex and degree of nicotine dependence. Usual care involved the receipt of physician advice on 3 occasions, self-help materials and 12 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy. Telephone counselling was provided by a nurse at 2, 6 and 13 weeks after the target quit date. Point-prevalent quit rates were determined at 52 weeks after the target quit date. RESULTS: The point-prevalent quit rates at 52 weeks did not differ significantly between the control and intervention groups (24.1% v. 23.4% respectively). The quit rates did not differ significantly at the secondary measurement points of 4, 12 and 26 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Brief physician assistance, along with nicotine replacement therapy, can help well-motivated smokers to quit. Three additional sessions of telephone counselling by a nurse were ineffective in increasing quit rates. This form of assistance may be useful in the absence of physician advice or when self-selected by patients.     

The impact of routine advice on smoking cessation from family physicians.

Cigarette smoking continues to be a major health problem. Therefore, physicians have been asked to advise all their patients on the hazards of smoking. A controlled trial was undertaken to measure the impact of family physicians' advice to cigarette smokers during a routine office visit. No significant differences were found in the three measures used to determine outcome--desire to stop smoking, an attempt to stop and success in stopping--between the control and intervention groups. These results are discussed in relation to the health belief model, and suggestions are made on how to increase the impact family physicians could have on smoking cessation to their practices.