腹腔镜下经胆囊管探查治疗胆总管结石的探索

目的对比研究腹腔镜下经胆囊管探查治疗肝外胆管结石。方法回顾性分析2011年10月至2012年12月术前经影像学证实为胆总管结石的213例患者。结果剖腹胆囊切除、胆总管探查取石、T管引流术115例,术后胆漏8例,术后胰腺炎31例,切口脂肪液化17例,术后T管放置(16.0±2.3)d,住院(21.0±4.2)d;腹腔镜下胆囊切除、胆总管切开取石、T管引流术51例,术后胆漏5例,术后胰腺炎7例,未发生切口脂肪液化,术后T管放置(14.0±3.3)d、住院(17.0±3.0)d;腹腔镜下胆囊切除、经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术(LTCBDE)47例,术后无胆漏发生,术后胰腺炎3例,未放置T管,未发生切口脂肪液化,住院(10.1±2.1)d。结论 LTCBDE是值得推荐的手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疾病的手术方法。     

腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果方法回顾性分析胆囊结石伴胆总管结石的62例患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同分为两组,腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术(LTCBDE组)28例、胆总管切开引流加T管引流术(LCHTD组)34例,对比两组手术的手术时间、中转开腹率、引流管留置时间、住院时间、住院费用、手术后并发症发生率。结果 LTCBDE组手术时间、引流管留置时间、住院天数、住院费用优于LCHTD组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);两组在中转开腹率及术后并发症比较,差异无显著性(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术是一种安全有效的术式,患者住院时间缩短,住院费用减少。     

腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石效果观察

目的探讨腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术(LTCBDE)治疗胆总管结石的效果。方法选取2015年1月~2020年1月我院收治的89例胆总管结石患者分为对照组44例和观察组45例。对照组采用腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术(LTDBDE),观察组采用LTCBDE,比较两组临床指标、并发症及结石残留情况。结果观察组肛门排气时间、手术时间及住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率4.44%略低于对照组13.64%,但组间比较,无显著性差异(P>0.05);两组结石残留率对比,无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论胆总管结石患者采用LTCBDE治疗具有一定的临床效果,术后患者创伤较小,且可减少术中出血量,利于患者术后恢复。     

胆总管Ⅰ期缝合经空肠置管治疗原发性胆总管结石

我们于 1997年 12月～ 2 0 0 0年 4月选择了 40例原发性胆总管结石胆管探查的患者 ,在取净结石后 期缝合胆总管 ,经胆总管 -空肠置细管引流取得了满意的效果 ,报告如下。1　资料与方法1.1　一般资料　男 18例 ,女 2 2例 ;年龄 2 6～ 80岁。 2 2例有黄疸史 ,7例入院时有黄疸。胆囊结石并胆总管结石 32例 ,胆总管结石合并慢性胆囊炎 8例。术前均经 B超检查 ,2 2例行ERCP检查 ,均明确了 1肝内胆管无结石。 2胆总管结石大小、数量、位置。1.2　手术方法　本组采用全麻或硬膜外麻醉 ,进腹探查后切开胆总管取净结石 ,探查左右肝管通畅及胆管下…     

经胆囊管胆总管探查术对胆总管结石患者结石残留率及并发症的影响

目的：探讨经胆囊管胆总管探查术对胆总管结石患者结石残留率及并发症的影响。方法：选取2017年4月~2018年4月河南鹤壁爱民医院收治的100例接受手术治疗的胆总管结石患者为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各50例。对照组行开腹胆总管切开取石术,观察组行内镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术。对比两组手术相关指标、术后结石残留率、术后并发症。结果：与对照组相比,观察组术中出血量更少,手术时间、切口长度更短,结石残留率、并发症发生率更低,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：经胆囊管胆总管探查术治疗的胆总管结石患者术中出血量更少,手术时间、切口长度更短,结石残留率、并发症发生率更低,临床治疗效果更好。     

腹腔镜经胆囊管纤维胆道镜检查取石治疗继发性胆总管结石

目的 探讨腹腔镜下经胆囊管纤维胆道镜(纤胆镜)探查取石术治疗继发性胆总管结石.方法 1998年8月～2006年12月,选择性对30例胆囊结石合并继发性胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜下经扩张的胆囊管纤胆镜探查取石术,胆囊管较细、取石困难的沿胆囊管向胆总管斜纵向切开,取净结石后腔内缝合.结果 6例胆道探查阴性,24例有胆总管结石,全部取净,取净率为100%.手术时间60～220 min,平均105 min.无胆漏、腹膜炎等并发症发生.随访0.5～5.0年,平均3年,无残余结石和胆道狭窄等并发症.结论 腹腔镜下经胆囊管纤胆镜探查取石术是微创治疗胆囊结石继发性胆总管结石的理想手术方式,安全可行.     

腹腔镜经胆囊管取除继发性胆总管结石的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜经胆囊管取除继发性胆总管结石的临床意义.方法采用四trocar技术腹腔镜下经胆囊管置入取石网篮,取除继发性胆总管结石,取除结石后,经胆囊管用生理盐水加压冲洗胆总管,再行术中胆道造影,证实无结石残留;或经扩张的胆囊管用纤维胆道镜进入胆总管取石,取除结石后,再探查胆总管,证实无结石残留.结果本组15例病人均获成功,手术时间平均2.25h(1.5～3.5h),术后住院时间平均4.7d(3～7d),术后随访1～12个月,无术后并发症发生.结论腹腔镜经胆囊管取除继发性胆总管结石安全、有效,具有较重要的临床价值.     

腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果

目的分析腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法随机将纳入的81例患者分成对照组(40例,腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石术)和观察组(41例,腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术)。比较两组的临床效果。结果观察组的手术时间、住院时间、术后进食时间均短于对照组,术中出血量及住院费用均少于对照组(P<0.05)。术后2周,观察组的GSRS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者采用腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术的临床疗效明显,值得应用与推广。     

腹腔镜联合输尿管镜经胆囊管治疗胆总管结石

目的 探讨输尿管镜在腹腔镜经胆囊管治疗胆总管结石的临床应用.方法 对6例腹腔镜联合输尿管镜经胆囊管治疗胆总管结石的临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果 6例腹腔镜联合输尿管镜经胆囊管治疗胆总管结石患者.无胆漏、出血、胰腺炎及胆管炎等并发症,术后未发现结石残余.结论 对合适的胆总管结石患者,采取腹腔镜联合输尿管镜经胆囊管治疗,是一种令人满意的方法.     

Outcomes of laparoscopic bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis with small common bile duct

BACKGROUNDLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) is one of the main treatments for choledocholithiasis with CBD diameter of larger than 10 mm. However, for patients with small CBD (CBD diameter ≤ 8 mm), endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the preferred treatment at present, but it also has some drawbacks associated with a series of complications, such as pancreatitis, hemorrhage, cholangitis, and duodenal perforation. To date, few studies have been reported that support the feasibility and safety of LCBDE for choledocholithiasis with small CBD.AIMTo investigate the feasibility and safety of LCBDE for choledocholithiasis with small CBD.METHODSA total of 257 patients without acute cholangitis who underwent LC + LCBDE for cholecystolithiasis from January 2013 to December 2018 in one institution were reviewed. The clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. According to whether the diameter of CBD was larger than 8 mm, 257 patients were divided into large CBD group (n = 146) and small CBD group (n = 111). Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for clinical differences. The demographics, intraoperative data, short-term outcomes, and long-term follow-up outcomes for the patients were recorded and compared.RESULTSIn total, 257 patients who underwent successful LC + LCBDE were enrolled in the study, 146 had large CBD and 111 had small CBD. The median follow-up period was 39 (14-86) mo. For small CBD patients, the median CBD diameter was 0.6 cm (0.2-2.0 cm), the mean operating time was 107.2 ± 28.3 min, and the postoperative bile leak rate, rate of residual CBD stones (CBDS), CBDS recurrence rate, and CBD stenosis rate were 5.41% (6/111), 3.60% (4/111), 1.80% (2/111), and 0% (0/111), respectively; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.4 ± 3.6 d. For large CBD patients, the median common bile duct diameter was 1.0 cm (0.3-3.0 cm), the mean operating time was 115.7 ± 32.0 min, and the postoperative bile leak rate, rate of residual CBDS, CBDS recurrence rate, and CBD stenosis rate were 5.41% (9/146), 1.37% (2/146), 6.85% (10/146), and 0% (0/146), respectively; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.7 ± 2.7 d. After propensity score matching, 184 patients remained, and all preoperative covariates except diameter of CBD stones were balanced. Postoperative bile leak occurred in 11 patients overall (5.98%), and no difference was found between the small CBD group (4.35%, 4/92) and the large CBD group (7.61%, 7/92). The incidence of CBDS recurrence did not differ significantly between the small CBD group (2.17%, 2/92) and the large CBD group (6.52%, 6/92).CONCLUSIONLC + LCBDE is safe and feasible for choledocholithiasis patients with small CBD and did not increase the postoperative bile leak rate compared with chole-docholithiasis patients with large CBD.     

Transcystic duct treatment of common bile duct stones

Successful removal of 2 retained common bile duct stones following cholecystostomy is described. With the use of the steerable catheter and the wire basket, one stone was crushed and the second was extracted in retrograde fashion through the cystic duct and gallbladder.     

腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术后胆道引流方法的改进

胆总管切开取石术后能否一期缝合的争论由来已久[1],一般认为胆总管一期缝合前须放置适当的胆道引流。我们在临床工作中探索制作了一胆道内置引流管,在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术后用胆道内置管引流,胆总管一期缝合,效果较满意[2],现将我们的经验介绍如下。1资料与方法1.1临床资料     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration to treat choledocholithiasis in situs inversus patients: A technical review

Situs inversus (SI) is a rare congenital condition characterized by a mirror-image transposition of the major visceral organs. Since the 1990s, more than one hundred SI patients have been reported to have successfully undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In these cases, the major problem is to overcome is the left-right condition for right-handed surgeons. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), an alternative to treat patients with bile duct stones, has shown equivalent efficacy and is less likely to cause pancreatitis than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Recent updated meta-analyses revealed that a shorter postoperative hospital stay, fewer procedural interventions, cost-effectiveness, a higher stone clearance rate, and fewer perioperative complications are additional advantages of LCBDE. However, the technique is technically demanding, even for skilled laparoscopic surgeons. Conducting LCBDE in patients with difficult situations, such as SI, is more complex than usual. We herein review published SI patients with choledocholithiasis treated by LCBDE, including our own experience, and this paper focuses on the technical aspects.     

腹腔镜与开腹胆总管探查术后患者肠道功能恢复的对比研究

目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术与开腹胆总管探查术对患者肠道功能恢复的影响。方法对比分析LCBDE组与OCBDE组各30例患者术后首次肛门排气与排便的时间(h)。结果LCBDE组与OCBDE组患者术后首次肛门排便时间分别为(32±14)h和(48±18)h,前者明显小于后者(P<0.01);LCBDE组与OCBDE组患者术后首次肛门排气时间分别为(56±22)h和(72±29)h,前者明显小于后者。结论与OCBDE相比,LCBDE对患者生理功能干扰小,术后肠道功能恢复快。     

腹腔镜下经胆囊管的胆总管探查取石术治疗肝外胆道结石

目的探讨腹腔镜下经胆囊管的胆总管探查取石术治疗肝外胆道结石的临床应用效果。方法应用该方法治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石26例，总结其临床资料。结果经胆囊管途径取石成功率为24／26，1例因胆囊管变异，1例导丝插入胆总管未成功，中转为胆总管切开术。术中扩张时无胆管撕裂，术后无腹腔出血、胆漏发生，无围手术期死亡。术后住院时间4-8d.结论对于胆囊结石合并继发性肝外胆管结石的病例，在采用腹腔镜下1次手术的方式治疗时，应首先考虑经胆囊管途径，以争取更小创伤以便更快地恢复。     

腹腔镜下胆总管探查术手术护理

目的总结腹腔镜下胆总管探查术(LCBDE)的手术护理,以进一步提高手术室护理质量。方法回顾性分析14例经腹腔镜下胆总管探查术患者的手术护理资料。结果 14例手术全部成功,无1例中转开腹,手术护理配合良好,顺利出院,无并发症发生。结论经腹腔镜下胆总管探查,胆总管取石术对患者创伤小,恢复快,住院时间短,术前准备充分,术中熟练的配合技巧,术后对精密仪器的认真清洗保养是手术进行的重要保证。     

不同方式的腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆总管结石的临床前瞻性研究

目的通过比较分析腹腔镜下经胆囊管和经胆总管切开T管引流及胆管一期缝合胆道镜取石治疗胆囊结石继发胆总管结石病人的疗效,以评价各种腹腔镜胆道探查方式治疗胆总管结石的临床价值。方法自2000年1月￣2003年6月根据4项筛选标准,对符合条件的61例病人按胆道探查途径不同分为经胆囊管组(n=14)和胆总管切开组,后者又分为胆总管一期缝合组(n=23)和T管引流组(n=24)。比较观察3组病例的手术时间、腹腔引流时间、术后住院日、恢复正常工作时间、术后平均输液量、住院费用、手术并发症及术后随访结果。结果经胆囊管组手术时间明显短于一期缝合组和T管引流组(P<0.05),T管引流组腹腔引流时间、术后住院日、恢复正常工作时间、术后平均输液量、住院费用明显长于或高于经胆囊管组和一期缝合组(P<0.05),而经胆囊管组和一期缝合组除手术时间外其他指标无明显差异(P>0.05)。经胆囊管组出现手术并发症1例(7.1%),一期缝合组出现手术并发症3例(13.0%),均为胆道并发症;T管引流组出现手术并发症7例(29.2%),其中胆道并发症5例(20.8%)。3组患者随访结果无明显差异。结论经胆囊管途径的腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗适合的胆囊结石继发胆总管结石病人的疗效优于胆管切开途径的腹腔镜胆道探查术,而后者中胆管一期缝合的疗效又明显优与T管引流。     

腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆石症的临床应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆石症的技术关键。方法该组共23例，胆总管纵向切开1．5-2．0cm用取石钳、胆道镜等取石。结石取净者作胆总管一期缝合，不能肯定取净者作T管引流。术中胆管外径≥1.0cm。术前无明确结石者作术中胆道造影；术前置鼻胆管的胆源性胰腺炎作延期胆道探查术。结果胆管造影7例，结石阳性2例；胆总管一期缝合8例；T管引流15例，结石残留2例，经术后胆道镜取净残石。结论腹腔镜胆道探查是一种安全、可靠的治疗胆石症的方法。