The role of D2-like dopamine receptors in the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice

RATIONALE: Previous studies indicate antagonism of cocaine-stimulated locomotor activity by dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists, but only at doses of the antagonists, that by themselves attenuate locomotor activity, raising questions of the specificity of the interaction and whether it might be due solely to a summation of opposing effects. OBJECTIVES: The interactions of cocaine and several D2-like dopamine antagonists and non-dopamine "physiological antagonists" were compared across a full range of doses in order to fully characterize the interaction and assess the specificity of the effects of dopamine antagonists and cocaine. METHODS: Swiss-Webster mice were treated with either vehicle, a D2-like antagonist (haloperidol, spiperone, raclopride, spiperone, (+) or (-) eticlopride), or a "physiological" antagonist (chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, or R(-) N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine) and cocaine (5-80 mg/kg) prior to a 30-min locomotor activity test. RESULTS: All test drugs decreased locomotor activity when given alone. All test drugs attenuated cocaine-induced locomotion and decreased peak responding to cocaine. In general, the D2-like antagonists also decreased maximal responding to cocaine and decreased the slope of the ascending limb of the cocaine dose-effect curve, effects not obtained with physiological antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of D2-like receptors resulted in an interaction with cocaine that was fundamentally different from that produced through non-dopaminergic mechanisms and appears to be more than a summation of opposing effects. The present data suggest that D2-like receptors are involved in the mechanisms underlying the induction of locomotor activity by cocaine.     

Involvement of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in the rat

The present study was carried out to determine the involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes D3 and D4, in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg of cocaine from vehicle. The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (1-10 mg/kg) were dose-dependent. The dopamine D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine (1.25-20 mg/kg) and the dopamine D3 receptor agonist R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.0001-0.3 mg/kg) produced cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects. Both the dopamine D3 receptor antagonist GR103691 (1 mg/kg) and the dopamine D4 receptor antagonist L745870 (1 mg/kg) partially antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (10 mg/kg) and the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). L745870 (0.001 mg/kg) inhibited the antagonistic effects of GR103691 (1 mg/kg) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (10 mg/kg), whereas the drug (0.001 mg/kg) enhanced the antagonistic effects of GR103691 (1 mg/kg) on the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). GR103691 (1 mg/kg) in combination with L745870 (0.001 mg/kg) did not markedly affect the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of bromocriptine (20 mg/kg). These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are different from the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of bromocriptine or R(+)-7-OH-DPAT, in terms of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of putative D3 dopamine receptor agonists in rats

Three separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate the putative D3 dopamine receptor agonists (+/-)-7-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) (0.03 mg/kg), PD 128,907 (1.0 mg/kg) and quinpirole (0.03 mg/kg) from saline. Food was presented after each 10 (7-OH-DPAT and PD 128,907) or 20 (quinpirole) consecutive responses on one lever after administration of the training drug, and the other lever after the administration of saline. Once stable performances were obtained, the effects of various doses of several dopaminergic agonists were assessed during test sessions in which responses on either lever were reinforced. The substitution tests were conducted to determine if differences in potencies would be obtained, which would be suggestive of differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative effects of the training drugs. Non-selective agonists with activity at both D2 and D3 dopamine receptors (D2-like agonists) substituted for each of the three training drugs. In addition, the selective D2 dopamine receptor agonist U91356A also generalized to both 7-OH-DPAT and PD 128,907. The potencies of the D2-like agonists in substituting for each training drug were highly correlated with potencies in substituting for the others. SKF 82958 and SKF 81297, agonists with selectivity for D1 and D5 dopamine receptors (D1-like agonists), partially substituted for 7-OH-DPAT but not PD 128,907. The D1-like partial agonist SKF 38393 did not substitute for any of the training drugs for which it was tested. Cocaine produced intermediate substitution in 7-OH-DPAT- and PD 128,907-trained subjects and did not substitute at all in quinpirole-trained subjects. The dopamine D1-like antagonist SCH 39166 (0.001-0.03 mg/kg) did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of PD 128,907, whereas the D2-like dopamine antagonist spiperone (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) produced at the highest dose an insurmountable antagonism of the discriminative effects of PD 128,907. In contrast, there was no appreciable antagonism of the effects of PD 128,907 on response rates. The data collected are consistent with a distinction between the effects of each of these training drugs and the indirectly acting agonist cocaine. Further, these data indicate that there are differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative effects of PD 128,907 and its effects on response rates. Moreover, these data indicate that each of the training drugs is distinct from drugs acting through D1 dopaminergic mechanisms. However, there were no data that clearly distinguished these training drugs from each other or from drugs acting through D2 dopaminergic mechanisms.     

Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rats

RATIONALE: Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors may modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine because they alter dopamine (DA) release. OBJECTIVES: The effects of the NOS inhibitors NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and 7-nitro-indazole (7-NI) were examined in experiments designed to better understand the mechanisms that may underlie the interactions between NOS inhibitors and cocaine. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline, and then substitution and pretreatment tests with L-NAME and 7-NI were conducted. To determine if the combined effects of NOS inhibitors and cocaine might be related to DA mechanisms and/or to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor mechanisms, substitution tests with other indirect DA agonists and NMDA antagonists were carried out in the presence and absence of L-NAME. In addition, the roles of the D1 and D2 families of DA receptors in mediating the cocaine-altering effects of L-NAME and 7-NI were examined in antagonism tests using SCH 23390 and haloperidol, respectively. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that neither NOS inhibitor alone substituted for the 10 mg/kg cocaine training dose, but when given as a pretreatment, 100 mg/kg L-NAME as well as 10 mg/kg 7-NI enhanced the discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of cocaine. L-NAME pretreatment also enhanced the potency of (+)-amphetamine and GBR 12909, but not MK-801, phencyclidine, or NPC 17742, for producing discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects in substitution tests. Further testing showed that the cocaine-enhancing effects of L-NAME and 7-NI were attenuated by doses of haloperidol and SCH 23390 that minimally altered the effects of cocaine alone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that L-NAME and 7-NI may increase the potency of cocaine and other indirect DA agonists through a central mechanism whereby DA neurotransmission is directly enhanced by NOS inhibition.     

Levo-tetrahydropalmatine attenuates cocaine self-administration under a progressive-ratio schedule and cocaine discrimination in rats

Levo-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP) is an alkaloid found in many traditional Chinese herbal preparations and has a unique pharmacological profile that includes dopamine receptor antagonism. Previously we demonstrated that l-THP attenuates fixed-ratio (FR) cocaine self-administration (SA) and cocaine-induced reinstatement in rats at doses that do not alter food-reinforced responding. This study examined the effects of l-THP on cocaine and food SA under progressive-ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement and the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. In adult male Sprague-Dawley rats self-administering cocaine (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg/inf), l-THP significantly reduced breaking points at the 1.875, 3.75 and 7.5 mg/kg doses. l-THP also reduced the breaking point and response rate for PR SA of sucrose-sweetened food pellets, although the decrease was significant only at the 7.5 mg/kg l-THP dose. In rats trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg, ip) from saline, l-THP (1.875, 3.75 and 7.5 mg/kg) produced a rightward shift in the dose-response curve for cocaine generalization. During generalization testing, l-THP reduced response rate, but only at the 7.5 mg/kg dose. l-THP also prevented substitution of the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist, (±) 7-OH-DPAT, for cocaine suggesting a potential role for antagonism of D2 and/or D3 receptors in the effects of l-THP. These data further demonstrate that l-THP attenuates the reinforcing and subjective effects of cocaine at doses that do not produce marked motor effects and provide additional evidence that l-THP may have utility for the management of cocaine addiction.     

Differential involvement of dopamine in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of low and high doses of caffeine in rats

The hypothesis that low and high doses of caffeine produce effects that are differentially mediated by dopamine (DA) receptor mechanisms was investigated in rats trained to discriminate either 10 or 56 mg/kg of caffeine from saline. Rats trained to discriminate 56 mg/kg of caffeine acquired the discrimination in an average of 74 sessions, whereas rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg of caffeine required an average of 108 sessions. The DA D1 receptor agonist SKF 81297 and the DA D2 receptor agonist R(-)-propylnorapomorphine (NPA) generalized partially (50-75%) in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg of caffeine, but produced predominantly saline-appropriate responding (< 40%) in rats trained to discriminate 56 mg/kg of caffeine. When SKF 81297 and NPA were combined, stimulus generalization was no greater than it was when either agonist was tested alone. The DA uptake inhibitors cocaine and GBR 12909 produced predominantly saline-appropriate responding in both groups of rats. Neither the DA D1 receptors antagonists SCH 23390 and SCH 31966, nor the DA D2 receptor antagonists eticlopride and sulpiride, generalized in rats trained to discriminate 10 or 56 mg/kg of caffeine. When administered in combination with caffeine, both the DA D1 and DA D2 antagonists antagonized completely the discriminative stimulus effects of the low training dose of caffeine, but did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of the high training dose. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of 10 mg/kg of caffeine, but not 56 mg/kg of caffeine, are dependent on, but not limited to, DA D1 and D2 receptor mechanisms.     

Effects of ecopipam, a selective dopamine D1 antagonist, on smoked cocaine self-administration by humans

RATIONALE: Data obtained in laboratory animals and humans suggest that dopamine D1 receptor antagonists decrease cocaine self-administration and block cocaine's discriminative stimulus and subjective effects. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effects of the selective dopamine D1 antagonist, ecopipam (SCH 39166), on the reinforcing, cardiovascular, and subjective effects of cocaine in humans. METHODS: Ten non-treatment-seeking cocaine smokers (two females, eight males), residing on an inpatient research unit, were maintained on placebo and ecopipam (100 mg p.o.) in random order using a within-subjects, cross-over design. Cocaine self-administration (0, 12, 25, and 50 mg) was tested beginning on the 5th day of each 8-day maintenance condition. A six-trial choice procedure (cocaine vs $5 merchandise vouchers) was utilized, with sessions consisting of one sample trial, when participants smoked the cocaine dose available that day, and five choice trials, when participants chose between smoking the available cocaine dose or receiving one merchandise voucher. RESULTS: In the presence of placebo cocaine, ecopipam significantly decreased cocaine craving while increasing alcohol and tobacco craving. In the presence of active cocaine, ecopipam increased cocaine self-administration (12 mg) and increased ratings of "good drug effect," "high," "stimulated," and dose quality (25 and 50 mg). Ecopipam produced small but significant increases in blood pressure, regardless of cocaine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance on the long-acting dopamine D1 antagonist, ecopipam, enhanced both cocaine self-administration as well as its subjective effects compared to maintenance on placebo. These data suggest that chronic antagonism of the dopamine D1 receptor may not be a useful approach for the treatment of cocaine abuse.     

Interactions of cocaine with dopamine D2-like antagonists in squirrel monkeys

Rationale

Studies investigating dopamine D₂ receptor antagonism of cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects have resulted in varied effects possibly due to the use of different antagonists, species, and procedures.

Objectives

The present study sought to further investigate D₂ antagonism of cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects using a variety of D₂ antagonists and multiple doses of the antagonists in combination with cocaine.

Methods

The benzamide D₂ antagonists, eticlopride, raclopride, and sulpiride, and the butyrophenone D₂ antagonists haloperidol and spiperone were administered alone and in combination with cocaine in squirrel monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine from saline under a fixed-ratio food reinforcement procedure.

Results

All the D₂ antagonists, except haloperidol, antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of the cocaine training dose. However, only the benzamide D₂ antagonists produced significant rightward shifts in the cocaine discriminative stimulus dose–effect curve and they only did so within a narrow dose range and time after administration. In contrast, the D₂ antagonists failed to antagonize the rate-suppressant effects of cocaine, and in some cases, cocaine appeared to antagonize the rate-suppressant effects of the antagonists.

Conclusions

The present results suggest (1) that D₂ antagonism of cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects depends critically on the selected antagonist, antagonist dose, and time of administration, as well as how antagonism is assessed (i.e., in terms of effects on training dose or on the cocaine dose–effect curve), (2) that the maximal shift in cocaine's discriminative stimulus dose–effect curve possible with D₂ antagonists under these procedures is ~two- to threefold, and (3) that different effects of cocaine are differentially sensitive to dopamine receptor antagonism.     

CGS 10746B is able to attenuate the effects of amphetamine: Further evidence for dopaminergic mediation

Previous results indicate that agents which either decrease synthesis or block postsynaptic dopamine receptors will attenuate the discriminative stimulus produced by d-amphetamine. CGS 10746B has been reported to decrease dopamine release without changing its metabolism or occupying its receptors. In the present study, rats successfully trained to discriminate intraperitoneally administered (0.8 mg/kg) d-amphetamine in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task were observed to be unable to discriminate amphetamine when pretreated with 30 mg/kg CGS 10746B. This antagonism was shown to be dose-responsive and constitutes a third mechanism, i.e., dopamine release inhibition, that evidences the dopaminergic mediation of amphetamine in the discriminative paradigm. When both cathinone (0.8 mg/kg) and cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) were administered to the amphetamine-trained rats they each were recognized as amphetamine and are, thus, considered to generalize to the amphetamine discriminative stimulus. Coadministration of CGS 10746B and cathinone totally antagonized this generalization, whereas pretreatment with CGS 10746B prior to cocaine significantly reduced cocaine's effects. These results implicate dopamine mechanisms in the discriminative stimulus properties of the psychostimulants amphetamine, cathinone and cocaine.     

Pharmacological and environmental determinants of relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior.

Animal models have been developed that simulate relevant features of relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior in humans. These models have provided valuable information about pharmacological and environmental factors that precipitate reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking in rats and monkeys, as well as new insights about potential pharmacotherapies for relapse prevention. Reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in animals can be induced by cocaine priming or by cocaine-paired environmental stimuli: however, maximum reinstatement of drug-seeking appears to be induced when cocaine priming and cocaine-paired stimuli are combined. Drugs that share cocaine's indirect dopamine agonist properties or that act as direct agonists at D2-like dopamine receptors also induce reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, whereas with some exceptions (e.g., caffeine, morphine) drugs from other pharmacological classes do not. D1-like receptor agonists block rather than mimic the priming effects of cocaine, suggesting different roles for D1- and D2-like receptor mechanisms in cocaine relapse. Although considerable overlap exists, drugs that exhibit cocaine-like discriminative stimulus and/ or reinforcing effects in other situations do not invariably induce cocaine-like reinstatement of drug-seeking and vice versa, implying that these effects are not simply different behavioral expressions of a unitary neurobiological process. Finally, recent findings with D1-like receptor agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists suggest that some of these drugs may be viable candidates for development as antirelapse pharmacotherapies.     

Effects of pregnanolone in rats discriminating cocaine

The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are typically attributed to its ability to increase dopaminergic transmission, although drugs that have different mechanisms of action can substitute for cocaine and modulation of the GABA(A) receptor system has been reported to alter its discriminative effects. Therefore, a discrimination procedure was used to extend the characterization of cocaine's discriminative effects and to examine the interaction between cocaine and pregnanolone, a drug that can modulate the GABA(A) receptor complex. Rats (n=15) were trained to discriminate saline from 5.6 or 10 mg/kg of cocaine under a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation. The dopamine releaser d-amphetamine and two monoamine uptake inhibitors bupropion and desipramine substituted for cocaine. In contrast, the positive GABA(A) modulators pregnanolone and lorazepam and the opioid agonist morphine did not substitute for cocaine. When administered prior to cocaine, the D(2) receptor antagonist haloperidol and pregnanolone, but not lorazepam, produced a small rightward shift of the cocaine dose-effect curve. The results of the present studies suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are not solely mediated by increases in dopaminergic transmission and that positive modulation of GABA(A) receptors by pregnanolone can alter these effects, albeit at doses that also decrease overall response rate.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists in rats

Rationale  Previous research has found the stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists difficult to distinguish in drug discrimination studies. Antagonism studies suggest that the stimulus effects of both types of agonists may be mediated primarily through D2 receptors. Objectives  The current study was designed to further assess the receptors mediating the stimulus effects of these agonists and to attempt to train rats to discriminate directly between D2- and D3-preferring dopamine agonists. Materials and methods  Four groups of eight rats were trained to discriminate either 0.1 mg/kg of the D3-preferring agonist pramipexole from saline, 1.0 mg/kg of the D2-preferring agonist sumanirole from saline, 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole from either saline or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole, or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole from either saline or 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole. Results  Three of eight rats in the 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole vs. 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole or saline failed to meet the training criteria, and the discrimination in this group was tenuous. The D2-preferring antagonist L-741,626 at 1.0 mg/kg was more effective at shifting to the right the pramipexole dose-response curve in pramipexole-trained rats, while 32 mg/kg of the selective D3 antagonist PG01037 had little effect. Quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT fully or partially substituted for both pramipexole and sumanirole in each group tested, while cocaine did not substitute in any group. Conclusions  Antagonist data along with the pattern of training and substitution data suggested that D2 receptor activation is primarily responsible for the stimulus effects of both sumanirole and pramipexole with D3 receptor activation playing little or no role.     

Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists on cocaine-induced self-stimulation and locomotor activity in rats.

To clarify the involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine systems in intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and locomotor activity in rats, we studied the acute effects of cocaine and the interaction between cocaine and dopamine antagonists with respect to these behaviors. Although cocaine (5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased locomotor activity, it augmented the rate of ICSS only at 5.0 mg/kg. The failure of high doses of cocaine to augment purpose-oriented behavior such as ICSS may result from its induction of a manic-like state. The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/kg) or the D2 antagonist nemonapride (0.04, 0.2, or 1.0 mg/kg) significantly decreased cocaine augmentation of ICSS. The higher two doses of either antagonist also produced a significant decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity. We therefore suspect that cocaine's augmentative effect on those behaviors, especially ICSS, requires activation of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors.     

μ-, δ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists do not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine or d-amphetamine in rats

Opioid receptor agonists can modulate the activity of dopamine neurons and could therefore, modify the behavioral effects of drugs that act through the dopamine systems, such as d-amphetamine and cocaine. We tested the ability of agonists selective for the μ- (morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, nalbuphine and heroin), δ- (DPDPE and SCH32615), and κ- (U69593 and bremazocine) opioid receptors to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats. Separate groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate between 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine or 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline. Rats were pretreated with vehicle or an agonist, then dose-response curves for d-amphetamine or cocaine were generated. None of the opioid agonists changed significantly the ED₅₀ values of cocaine and d-amphetamine. As a positive control, we tested for antagonism of these effects by the D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and eticlopride, respectively. Both antagonists at least partially attenuated the stimulus effects of both training drugs. Our results suggest that any modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission by the agonists tested in the present study is not sufficient to affect the stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats.     

Cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine discrimination in dopamine D2 receptor mutant mice

RATIONALE: Dopamine (DA) D2-like antagonists block several effects of cocaine, including its locomotor stimulant and interoceptive discriminative-stimulus effects. Because these compounds generally lack selectivity among the D2-like DA receptors, the specific roles of the subtypes remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: DA D2 receptor knockout (DA D2R KO), heterozygous (HET), and wild-type (WT) mice were used to study the role of D2 DA receptors in the effects of cocaine. Some effects of the relatively selective DA D2-like antagonist raclopride were also studied to further assess the role of D2 receptors. METHODS: DA D2R KO, HET, and WT mice were treated with cocaine (1-10 mg/kg) or vehicle, and their horizontal locomotor activity was assessed. The mice were also trained to discriminate i.p. injections of saline from cocaine (10 mg/kg) using a two-response key, fixed-ratio-20 response, food-reinforcement procedure. A range of doses of cocaine (1.0-17 mg/kg) was administered before 15-min test sessions. RESULTS: Both DA D2R KO and HET mice showed reduced levels of horizontal activity relative to WT mice. Cocaine dose dependently stimulated activity in each genotype, with the highest level of activity induced in the DA D2R WT mice. All three genotypes acquired the discrimination of 10 mg/kg cocaine; tested doses of 1.0-10.0 mg/kg produced dose-related increases in the number of cocaine-appropriate responses. Raclopride, at inactive to fully active doses (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), did not fully substitute for cocaine. Raclopride dose dependently shifted the cocaine dose-effect curve to the right in DA D2R WT and HET mice. However, in DA D2R KO mice, raclopride was inactive as an antagonist. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate an involvement of D2 DA receptors in the locomotor-stimulating effects and the interoceptive discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine in WT subjects. However, the D2 receptor is not necessary for the effects, suggesting redundant dopaminergic mechanisms for the discriminative-stimulus interoceptive effects of cocaine.     

Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-7-OH-DPAT by remoxipride but not PNU-99194A

The dopamine (DA) agonist 7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-amino-tetralin (7-OH-DPAT) has been used extensively as a tool to investigate the role of DA D(3) receptors in the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulant drugs. The present study examined the relative importance of D(3) vs. D(2) receptor actions in the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.03 mg/kg, sc) in 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate this compound from saline in a two-lever, water-reinforced operant procedure under a FR 20 schedule. Stimulus generalization and antagonism tests were conducted with cocaine and with various selective D(2) and D(3) receptor ligands. In contrast to previous findings that (+)-7-OH-DPAT substitutes for cocaine, the present results demonstrated that cocaine does not produce stimulus generalization in animals trained to discriminate (+)-7-OH-DPAT. Although two D(3)-preferring agonists, PD-128907 and pramipexole, produced complete stimulus generalization to the training drug, two highly selective D(3) antagonists (PNU-99194A, PD 152255) failed to block the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-7-OH-DPAT. However, the D(2) antagonist remoxipride (3.0 mg/kg) produced a rightward shift in the (+)-7-OH-DPAT dose-response curve. These findings suggest that D(2) receptors are critically involved in mediating the cue properties of (+)-7-OH-DPAT. However, alternative interpretations that PNU-99194A is not entirely D(3) receptor selective should also be considered.     

Differential involvement of dopamine receptors in conditioned suppression induced by cocaine

Cocaine-paired stimuli can suppress food-reinforced operant behavior in rats, providing an animal model of conditioned drug effects. To study the neuropharmacological basis of this phenomenon, we examined the effects of various dopamine receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of cocaine-induced conditioned suppression in rats. Superimposed on an ongoing baseline of food-reinforced operant responding, a stimulus was paired with response-independent cocaine (3.0 mg/kg, i.v.) during each of 8 training sessions. To study acquisition, independent groups of rats were given saline, the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH 23390) (0.001-0.03 mg/kg, i.p.), or the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.001-0.03 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to each training session. To study expression, independent groups of rats were trained first, then given saline, SCH 23390, eticlopride, or N-[4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazinyl)butyl]-2-naphthamide (BP 897) (a dopamine D(3) partial receptor agonist; 0.1-1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) before test sessions in which the stimulus was presented without cocaine. Pre-treatment with either SCH 23390 or eticlopride during acquisition reduced the direct suppressant effects of cocaine, but conditioning was blocked only in rats that were treated with SCH 23390 during acquisition training. Expression of conditioning was attenuated only by eticlopride. Thus, dopamine at least partially mediates both the acquisition and expression of cocaine-induced conditioned suppression, with activation of dopamine D(1)- and D(2)-like receptors underlying these respective processes.     

Modulation of cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects by dopamine D(1) agonists in rhesus monkeys

Dopamine (DA) D(1) agonists are classified as high- or low-efficacy on the basis of in vitro functional measures as compared to DA. In monkeys self-administering cocaine, high-efficacy D(1) agonists have been shown to have reinforcing effects, while low-efficacy agonists do not. However, the relationship between D(1) agonist efficacy and cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, particularly in rhesus monkeys, is not clear. The present study investigated the discriminative stimulus effects of a high- (SKF 81297) and a low-efficacy (SKF 38393) D(1) agonist in rhesus monkeys (n=4) trained to discriminate cocaine from saline using a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. In a second experiment, the effects of agonist pretreatments, as well as pretreatment with a D(1) antagonist, on cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects were evaluated. SKF 81297 (0.01-1.7 mg/kg) fully substituted for cocaine in three of four animals (> 80% cocaine-appropriate responding), while SKF 38393 (0.3-10 mg/kg) occasioned < 50% cocaine-appropriate responding in all subjects. When given as a pretreatment, neither agonist altered cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects at the doses tested. In contrast, the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 attenuated cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. These results indicate that D(1) agonists have cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys that are consistent with their in vitro efficacies. However, when given in combination with cocaine, D(1) agonist efficacy does not appear to be a major factor in modifying cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects.     

SA 4503 attenuates cocaine-induced hyperactivity and enhances methamphetamine substitution for a cocaine discriminative stimulus

Cocaine exhibits preferential (~ 15-fold) affinity for σ₁ over σ₂ sigma receptors, and previous research has shown an interaction of σ₁ receptor-selective ligands and cocaine's behavioral effects. The present study investigated the effect of the putative sigma receptor agonist SA 4503 (1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenethyl)-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride) on cocaine's locomotor stimulatory and discriminative stimulus properties. At doses without intrinsic activity, SA 4503 dose-dependently attenuated cocaine-induced hyperactivity in mice. This inhibition was overcome by increasing the cocaine dose. In rats trained to use cocaine as a discriminative stimulus in a drug discrimination task, doses of SA 4503 that did not substitute for the cocaine stimulus did not alter the cocaine substitution curve. However, SA 4503 potentiated the effect of methamphetamine to substitute for the cocaine stimulus. These data support a role for sigma receptors in the locomotor-activating properties of cocaine and, importantly, indicate a role for these receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. The data also suggest sigma receptors mediate the activity of different dopamine pathways responsible for the behavioral effects of psychostimulants.     

Effects of ifenprodil on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Ifenprodil is a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist which prefers NR2B-containing NMDA receptors to NR2A-containing NMDA receptors. It has been reported that ifenprodil suppresses morphine-induced place preference in mice. In this study, the effects of ifenprodil on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine were examined in rhesus monkeys. Five monkeys were trained to discriminate cocaine at 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg im from saline using a standard two-lever drug-discrimination paradigm under a fixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement. A single dose of cocaine (0.06-0.5 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent increase in cocaine-appropriate response, and training doses produced 100% cocaine-lever response in each monkey. Pretreatment with ifenprodil (1 or 2 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked the cocaine-appropriate response when low doses of cocaine were used. The results suggest that NR2B-containing NMDA receptor-mediated mechanisms modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.