Conventional immunosuppression after deliberate third party transfusions versus cyclosporine in living related renal transplant recipients

A total of 93 recipients of either HLA-identical (34) or 1-haplotype matched (59) living related donor renal transplants was assigned prospectively into immunosuppressive treatment groups on the basis of transfusion histories obtained at the initial evaluation for transplantation. Patients who received 0 to 2 third party transfusions were given no further transfusion, and received cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression after transplantation (cyclosporine group). Patients who received 3 or 4 third party transfusions were given additional transfusions until 5 had been received, and were managed with azathioprine and prednisone after transplantation (azathioprine group). Patients who already received 5 or more third party transfusions had no additional transfusions and were assigned to the azathioprine group. No patient had a positive crossmatch to the potential donor after initial evaluation and confirmation of a negative crossmatch. The number of rejection episodes per patient after transplantation was significantly higher in the azathioprine group for HLA-identical (p equals 0.001) and 1-haplotype (p equals 0.003) recipients. One-year patient survival rats for the HLA-identical cyclosporine and azathioprine groups were 100 and 94 per cent, respectively, with respective 1-year allograft survivals of 100 and 89 per cent in the 2 groups. In the 1-haplotype group 1-year patient survival rates were 95 and 94 per cent for the cyclosporine and azathioprine groups, respectively; allograft survival was 81 per cent for the cyclosporine group and 91 per cent for the azathioprine group. None of the observed differences in graft or patient survival between the 2 groups was statistically significant. Deliberate third party transfusions with conventional immunosuppression and cyclosporine immunosuppression are effective methods to treat recipients of living related donor renal transplants.     

Successful transplantation of cyclosporine-treated haploidentical living-related renal recipients without blood transfusions

A protocol of cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression was used in 36 consecutive haploidentical living-related renal transplant recipients from donors displaying marked proliferation in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) reactions. All blood transfusions (random third-party and donor-specific) were withheld once a negative crossmatch with the prospective kidney donor was obtained. With a mean follow-up of 13.6 months, patient survival is 97% (35/36) and graft survival is 92% (33/36). One graft was lost to rejection; two were abandoned because of sepsis. Only 14% (5/36) of patients experienced a rejection episode. No significant differences were evident in graft survival, rejection episodes, or renal function between the 15 recipients who were never transfused and the 21 with a history of previous blood transfusions. These findings suggest that pretransplant blood transfusions not only are unnecessary to achieve excellent graft survival, but also may jeopardize donor availability by donor-specific presensitization.     

Are blood transfusions beneficial in the cyclosporine era?

In patients treated with conventional immunosuppression (azathioprine and prednisone) after renal transplantation, there is a beneficial effect of pre-transplant blood transfusions on graft survival; in patients treated with cyclosporine, this effect may be lost. In 66 children who received living-related donor transplants after donor-specific transfusions (DST) and were treated with azathioprine-prednisone in our center, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 99% and 77% respectively. These rates were similar to those reported for children who did not receive DST but were treated with cyclosporine in other centers. There were 634 adult and pediatric recipients of cadaver transplants in our center who were treated with cyclosporine and prednisone (non-sequential therapy,n=89) or antilymphoblast globulin, azathioprine preduisone, and cyclosporin (sequential therapy,n=545). When all patients were considered, graft survival rates were higher in transfused than in non-transfused patients at 3–5 years, but in the sequential therapy group, there were no differences in graft survival rates between transfused and non-transfused patients. The results suggest that transfusions do not improve cadaver graft survival in patients receiving optimal cyclosporine therapy and that equally good related donor graft survival can be achieved with DST and conventional immunosuppression or no DST and cyclosporine.     

Mismatched living, related donor renal transplantation: a prospective, randomized study

A prospective, randomized study of 49 mismatched living, related donor renal transplants was undertaken to compare the effect of donor-specific transfusions (DST) combined with conventional immunosuppressive therapy (azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphoblast globulin) to cyclosporine and prednisone with and without use of prior DST. The results demonstrated that cyclosporine and prednisone without DST have equal patient and graft survival rates after transplantation and an equal incidence of infectious complications and rejection episodes when compared with recipients who received DST and conventional therapy. Patients who received DST and subsequent cyclosporine had poor graft survival rates with more rejection episodes and infectious complications. Hospitalization and the relative cost of transplantation were decreased when recipients received cyclosporine without prior DST. It is concluded that cyclosporine allows easier access to transplantation, is more cost effective in the initial posttransplant period, and does not subject the recipient to the risk of donor sensitization as is seen with DST recipients given conventional therapy. The nephrotoxic side effects of cyclosporine have been minimal and renal function remains excellent in the recipients treated with cyclosporine.     

Efficacy of a single pretransplant donor-specific transfusion and cyclosporin A administered 24 to 48 hours before one-haplotype-mismatched living related donor kidney transplant.

During the 7-year period from March 1984 to June 1991, 86 haploidentical living related kidney recipients were entered into one of three donor-specific transfusion (DST) and cyclosporine treatment protocols: (1) Multiple pretransplant DSTs with cyclosporine begun after transplant, n = 34; (2) Multiple pretransplant DSTs with cyclosporine begun pretransplant, n = 31; and (3) a single DST 24 to 48 hours before transplant with intravenous cyclosporine initiated after the transfusion, n = 21. Triple immunosuppression (prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine) was continued in all groups after transplant. The 1-year patient (97%, 97%, and 93%, p = not significant) and graft (91%, 90%, and 87%, p = not significant) survival were similar for the three groups. No differences were seen in the incidence of rejection at 1 year (61%, 45%, and 60%, p = not significant) or in the incidence of infectious complications (26%, 42%, and 47%, p = not significant). It is concluded that a single DST given 24 to 48 hours before operation followed by pretransplant cyclosporine is as effective as classic DST conditioning of recipients using either pretransplant or post-transplant cyclosporine. The single DST protocol has the advantage of not eliminating any donors because of sensitization and was less costly and easier to administer.     

The use of cyclosporine in living-related renal transplantation. Donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and steroid withdrawal

Fourteen HLA-identical (HLA-ID) and 62 haploidentical (HP-ID) living-related donor (LRD) renal allograft recipients were transplanted using cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone immunosuppression. No patients were preconditioned with pretransplant blood transfusions (third-party or donor-specific)--and, therefore, none were sensitized to their donor. Patient 93% (13/14) and graft 93% (13/14) survival for the HLA-ID patients is not significantly different (P greater than .1) compared with patient 98% (61/62) and graft 91% (56/62) survival in the HP-ID patients, with a mean follow-up of 16.3 (8-30) and 14.7 (2-35) months, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the incidence of treated rejection episodes (0% vs. 31%, P less than .01) and the mean serum (mg/dl) creatinine (1.37 vs. 1.71, P less than .05) at 18 months between the HLA-ID and the HP-ID and HP-ID recipients, respectively. Ten of 22 HP-ID recipients demonstrated donor-specific mixed lymphocyte culture hyporesponsiveness one year posttransplant that may have been due to the emergence of monocytoid suppressor cells. Nine of these HP-ID and seven HLA-ID recipients were subjected to a protocol of steroid withdrawal. Eleven of these patients are currently on CsA monodrug therapy and two are on alternate-day steroids from 9-18 months after discontinuation of prednisone. These findings suggest that CsA is an effective steroid-sparing agent in LRD renal transplantation that diminishes the frequency of treated rejection episodes and may permit monodrug therapy in selected individuals.     

An approach to ABO-incompatible liver transplantation in children.

Survival in ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation has been reported to be between 40% and 60%. Management techniques have included routine immunosuppression as well as prophylactic antilymphoblast globulin, pre- and posttransplant plasmapheresis (PLPH), and splenectomy. Over a 6-year period, 155 orthotopic liver transplants were performed in 139 pediatric patients. Seven children received an ABO-I allograft. In the latter transplants, immunosuppression consisted of triple-drug therapy (cyclosporine A, prednisone, and azathioprine) along with prospective double-volume PLPH for ABO titers (IgA and IgM) greater than or equal to 1:8. Splenectomy was not performed on any patient. One patient was refractory to PLPH and was treated with a hemofiltration system using an immunoadsorption cartridge with synthetic A group antigen. The overall survival for patients receiving ABO-I allografts was 57% (4/7), with a 67% (4/6) graft survival in those patients treated with PLPH. The graft survival for patients treated with prospective PLPH and MALG was 60% (3/5). There was a 60% incidence of rejection in those patients treated with prospective PLPH and these episodes were all mild (steroid bolus only). While ABO-I transplantation is a reasonable option in the emergency setting, further study is necessary before it should be routinely used to increase the general donor organ pool in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Multivariate analysis of donor-specific versus random transfusion protocols in haploidentical living-related transplants

A total of 127 haploidentical living-related transplants have been performed at our institution since March 1986. A donor-specific transfusion plus azathioprine protocol was used until July 1988 (n = 74) and a random transfusion (RT) protocol without AZA used thereafter (n = 53) in an effort to decrease risk of recipient sensitization and reduce the burden on the prospective donor. All patients were given cyclosporine 8 mg/kg/day orally beginning 1 week prior to transplantation. Immunosuppression was similar in both groups and consisted of triple induction therapy with prednisone, CsA, and AZA. A positive T cell crossmatch eliminated the potential donor. Seven individuals (9.6%) were sensitized in the DST group and 1 (1.9%) in the RT group, leaving 67 and 52 patients in the two groups of the study, respectively. Groups were similar with respect to age, sex, history of pregnancy in female patients, peak and baseline panel-reactive antibody (PRA), DR match, and prior transplants. The groups differed slightly with respect to AB antigens shared, with an advantage in the RT group. Actuarial graft survival was not statistically significantly different between the two groups, with 2-year graft survival of 95% in the DST and 91% in the RT group (log rank, P = 0.16). Patients in the RT group had significantly more rejection episodes and had them sooner than their counterparts in the DST group. At the end of 1 year, 50% of patients in the DST group had at least 1 rejection episode, compared with 75% of patients in the RT group (P = 0.0008). Multivariate (Poisson) analysis of 10 variables was performed, with an overall model P-value of 0.0001. Only DST (P = 0.0001) and pregnancy (P = 0.015) were significant predictors of rejection episodes, both protective. The difference in rejection episodes and the timing with which they occur has not yet translated into a significant difference in graft survival between DST and RT groups.     

Outcome of renal transplantation in children less than two years of age.

Twenty-two renal transplants were performed in 21 children less than two years of age at Children's Hospital. Fourteen were from living related donors and eight were from cadaveric donors. The five year patient and graft survivals of these recipients were compared to all other pediatric recipients between two and 18 years of age who received renal transplants over the same time period. Five year graft survival for recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor transplantation and 38% following cadaver donor transplantation. Older pediatric recipients aged between two and 18 years had a five year graft survival of 73% following living-related donor renal transplantation, which was similar to that for recipients less than two years of age. Although older cadaveric recipients had a comparable five year graft survival to younger recipients, at 42%, the patterns of graft loss were different. Graft failures in young recipients occurred within the first seven months post-transplant, whereas the older recipient's grafts failed more gradually. Actuarial five-year patient survival in recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor renal transplantation and 70% following cadaver-donor renal transplantation. Recipients less than two years of age had a poorer patient survival than older recipients following both living-related donor renal transplantation (P = 0.06) and cadaver-donor renal transplantation (P less than 0.05). These findings suggest that the graft survival of living-related donor renal transplantation in recipients less than two years of age is better than that of cadaver-donor renal transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The utility of cyclosporine weaning in renal transplantation.

Abrupt conversion of cyclosporine immunosuppression to conventional treatment with azathioprine and prednisone avoids long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, albeit at the cost of a 20% to 40% rejection rate. The authors investigated the benefits and risks of a cyclosporine weaning protocol in 24 cadaveric and 9 live donor kidney recipients treated with a sequential quadruple immunosuppressive protocol. In cadaver kidney recipients, slow tapering of cyclosporine resulted in a 19% (p less than 0.001) improvement in the glomerular filtration rate, as estimated by the inverse ratio of the plasma creatinine concentration. Cadaver kidney recipients were stratified according to graft function (GFR ratio greater than 0.76, less than 0.76) at the of cyclosporine discontinuation. In 12 patients with well-functioning grafts, a 24% improvement was observed, whereas in 12 patients with poor graft function, the gain was limited to 13%. Patients with limited graft function tended to have more acute rejection episodes before cyclosporine weaning (0.92 +/- 0.64 versus 0.42 +/- 0.64, not significant). When the 24 cadaver kidney recipients were stratified according to onset of graft function after transplantation (days to plasma creatinine of 250 mumol/L), need for dialysis, panel reactive antibodies (PRA), and duration of cyclosporine treatment, no significant differences in graft function were observed at the onset or end of cyclosporine weaning. Acute graft rejection before cyclosporine weaning was the only variable associated with a significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio at the end of cyclosporine treatment (0.83 +/- 0.11 versus 0.67 +/- 0.16, p less than 0.01). Weaning of cyclosporine was associated with a minimal risk of acute graft rejection. A single patient with stable graft function at the onset of the weaning process experienced an acute but reversible rejection episode 2 months after cyclosporine was discontinued. In summary, gradual weaning of cyclosporine improves graft function, and eliminates the excessive risk of acute graft rejection without the need for additional corticosteroid treatment.     

Maintenance immunosuppression therapy and outcome of renal transplantation in North American children — a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study collects extensive data on all transplants entered into its registry. For this study we evaluated 568 cadaver kidney and 492 live-donor recipients with graft function at 30 days post transplant. Utilizing maintenance immunosuppressive therapy at 30 days post transplant we evaluated patient and graft outcome, mortality and morbidity over the first 6 months post transplant. For cadaver kidney recipients, 36 patients were receiving prednisone and azathioprine (PA), 114 were maintained on prednisone and cyclosporine (PC) and 418 were on prednisone, cyclosporine and azathioprine (PCA). Patients receiving PA had a greater incidence of rejection prior to 30 days, a greater incidence of hospitalization for rejection and for hypertension over the next 6 months and a greater loss of allograft in the first 6 months compared with the other two groups. The only difference noted between PC and PCA was a lower serum creatinine in the PCA group at 6 months. For living-related kidney recipients, there were 78 patients maintained on PA, 97 on PC and 317 on PCA. Again patients receiving PA had a higher rate of hospitalization for rejection and a higher rate of graft loss. When patients receiving PC were compared with those receiving PCA, no differences were noted in the 6-month serum creatinine values, but a greater percentage of PCA patients were receiving antibiotics on day 30. We conclude that PA is poor therapy for both groups, PCA is ideal therapy for cadaver kidney recipients, but no beneficial effects are noted when PCA is used over PC for live-related donor kidney transplants.Presented at the 10th annual meeting of the American Society of Transplant Physicians, 29 May 1991, Chicago     

Pediatric renal transplantation under FK-506 immunosuppression.

Renal transplantation (11 cadaveric and 1 living-related donor) was performed in 12 pediatric recipients (mean age 10.8 years) under FK-506 immunosuppression in combination with prednisone therapy. At a mean followup of 6.1 months, patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 92%, respectively. The only graft loss was due to the recurrent hemolytic uremic syndrome 4 days after transplantation. In the functioning grafts the mean serum creatinine is 1.59 +/- 1.27 mg./dl. and the mean blood urea nitrogen is 36.3 +/- 24.6 mg./dl. Three patients take no prednisone, 5 are receiving 0.15 to 0.25 mg./kg. per day and 3 are taking 0.35 to 0.5 mg./kg. per day. There was a total of 8 rejection episodes in 5 patients. All rejection episodes were successfully reversed. Complications of transplantation included an episode of seizures in 1 patient, cytomegalovirus infection in 1 and steroid-induced diabetes mellitus in 1. Since pediatric transplant recipients are a group in whom the reduction or elimination of steroids is highly desirable, FK-506 immunosuppression may be particularly suited for use in this population.     

Pretransplant blood transfusions with cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplantation

Pretransplant transfusions were repeatedly shown to be associated with improved graft survival in the ”pre-cyclosporine era,” and have recently been shown to be beneficial in patients on modern immunosuppressive regimes. In an attempt to improve this transfusion effect and minimize the potential development of cytotoxic antibodies, we have given these transfusions, with concomitant cyclosporine cover, prior to transplantation. Ninety-two renal transplantations were performed in 91 children in the study group (group 1) and all received pretransplant transfusions with cyclosporine cover. Results were compared with a preceding group of 102 children (104 transplantations) who had received pretransplant transfusions without cyclosporine cover (group 2). There were 70 cadaver and 22 living-related donor (LRD) transplants in group 1, and 88 cadaver and 16 LRD transplants in group 2. Graft survival rates (1- and 5-year) for cadaver transplantation were 96% and 90% in group 1 compared with 78% and 64% in group 2 (P=0.001). For LRD transplantation, these figures were 95% and 87% in group 1 and 81% and 69% in group 2. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age at transplantation, sex, donor age, HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatches, or cold and warm ischemia times. All cadaver graft recipients received quadruple, sequential immunosuppression post transplant. However, 9 patients in group 1 were changed to tacrolimus for recurrent rejection episodes. No patient developed persistent lymphocytotoxic antibodies post transfusion or side effects of cyclosporine. Cyclosporine can be safely given with whole blood prior to transplantation with no adverse effect and no sensitization. Graft survival was significantly improved in this group of patients and graft loss due to rejection was exceptional. This effect should be further evaluated in prospective studies. Received: 10 June 1999 / Revised: 9 March 2000 / Accepted: 10 March 2000     

Cyclosporine versus azathioprine: a review of 200 consecutive cadaver renal transplant recipients

Most renal transplant centers report an increase in graft survival when cyclosporine is used as a primary immunosuppressant. We report the outcome of 200 consecutive cadaver renal transplant recipients among whom initial immunosuppression and risk factors were similar except for the substitution of cyclosporine for azathioprine in the second 100 recipients. Azathioprine-treated recipients had significantly increased (p less than 0.05) mean hospital stays (31.9 versus 18.3 days), incidence of first rejection episodes (85 versus 31) and methylprednisolone dose (3.38 versus 0.06 gm. per patient). Cyclosporine-treated recipients had a significantly higher 1-year mean serum creatinine level (1.85 versus 1.56 mg. per dl.) and 1-year actual graft survival (83 versus 58 per cent). Despite mild nephrotoxicity, cyclosporine is superior to azathioprine as a primary immunosuppressant in cadaver kidney transplantation.     

Kidney retransplantation in the cyclosporine era

The results of kidney retransplantation in the cyclosporine era remain to be determined. Over a 42-month period, 76 nonprimary renal transplants (66 second, 7 third, 3 fourth allografts) were performed in 73 recipients under cyclosporine immunosuppression. The patient population was predominantly white (90.4%) with a mean age of 32.3 years. Twenty-one recipients (28.8%) were diabetic, and 36 (49.3%) were highly sensitized (panel-reactive antibody [PRA] greater than 50%). Sixty-two patients received cadaver donor grafts while the remaining donations were living-related (12) or living-unrelated (2). A sequential antilymphocyte globulin/cyclosporine protocol was employed, with cyclosporine therapy delayed until adequate renal function occurred. Overall patient and graft survival is 92.1% and 60.5%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 20.0 months. The mean serum creatinine is 1.64 mg/dl in the 46 functioning allografts. Graft survival is 63.6% for secondary grafts, 28.6% for tertiary grafts, and 66.7% for fourth kidney transplants. In second transplants, recipients of cadaver donor kidneys have a graft survival of 58.5%, while living-related donor graft survival is 84.6% (P = 0.07). In the cadaver retransplant population, duration of previous transplant function greater than one year and HLA-DR matching were associated with increased graft survival, while age over 39 and presence of diabetes mellitus with reduced graft survival. However, these trends were not significant. Peak PRA above 50% did demonstrate a significant negative impact on graft survival both in the univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors. Acute rejection occurred in 50 patients (65.8%), and was successfully reversed 50% of the time. Of the 30 grafts lost, 25 (83.3%) occurred within four months of retransplantation. Transplant nephrectomy was performed in 20 patients. Cyclosporine was not administered in 21 (70%) of these early graft failures, negating any potential beneficial effect. Retransplantation can be performed safely, with living-donor graft survival superior to cadaver retransplant rates. Rejection and early graft loss are common, especially in the highly sensitized patient. The impact of cyclosporine immunosuppression in renal retransplantation is much less dramatic than in primary transplantation in a protocol that delays cyclosporine therapy until allograft function is demonstrated.     

Incidence and severity of acute cardiac allograft rejection with two different low-dose cyclosporine maintenance protocols

Currently cyclosporine (CyA) represents the main immunosuppressive agent used after cardiac transplantation and usually is administered in combination with prednisone and/or azathioprine for prevention of graft rejection. From March, 1984, to August, 1987, 53 patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation for terminal-stage heart disease at the Second Department of Surgery, University of Vienna. All patients received CyA in increasing dosage (3 mg/kg to 6-10 mg/kg) postoperatively according to renal function, obtaining a trough high-pressure liquid chromatographic whole-blood target level of 200 to 400 ng/ml at the end of the first week. CyA was subsequently tapered to 100 to 150 ng/ml after 6 months. From March, 1984, through April, 1986, maintenance immunosuppression was carried out with a double-drug regimen of CyA and azathioprine. Since May, 1986, a triple-drug schedule was applied with CyA, azathioprine, and prednisone. Under triple-drug therapy, the incidence of mild, moderate (p less than 0.0001), and severe (p = 0.05) allograft rejection proven by endomyocardial biopsy decreased significantly with a corresponding increase of absent (p less than 0.0001) rejection. Freedom from moderate, severe, and lethal graft rejection, number of rejection episodes per patient after 1 year (double drug, 1.0, versus triple drug, 2.5), and patient survival disclosed significant improvement for recipients of the triple-drug regimen. Both groups had the same incidence of infectious complications; freedom from death by infection after 1 year was 90% versus 91% (double versus triple drug, p = 0.20).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cyclosporine in heart and heart-lung transplantation

At Stanford University Medical Center from January 1968 until January 1984, 288 patients received 313 heart transplants. The immunosuppressive regimen before December 1980 consisted of azathioprine and prednisone, with or without rabbit antithymocyte globulin. After that time cyclosporine replaced azathioprine. In 92 recipients of 95 heart allografts, the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 82% and 65% to 70% respectively. In the 3 years from March 1981 to March 1984, successful heart-lung transplantation was accomplished in 13 of 19 recipients, using cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Survival ranged from 1 to 38 months. While it is true that cyclosporine has improved survival in heart transplant recipients, has allowed successful heart-lung transplantation to be performed, has shortened intensive care unit and total hospital stays and therefore hospital costs, and has allowed easier management of rejection and infection, several disconcerting problems have not yet been resolved. These include hypertension that is difficult to control and renal dysfunction in all patients, and the fact that cellular and humoral rejection still occurs, as manifested by graft atherosclerosis, bronchiolitis obliterans and classic acute rejection. Better understanding and application of cyclosporine immunosuppression will undoubtedly minimize both cyclosporine- and non-cyclosporine-related postoperative complications and will improve survival even further.     

Effect of pretransplant stored donor-specific blood transfusions on early renal allograft survival in one-haplotype living related transplants

The effect of pretransplant stored donor-specific blood transfusions (DSBTs) on early renal allograft survival in 37 consecutive one-haplotype living related donor (LRD) transplants (group B) was compared with a similar consecutive series of 38 one-haplotype LRD recipients (group A) who did not receive DSBTs. All transplant recipients in both groups were treated with identical immunosuppressive protocols using azathioprine and prednisone. Forty patients received pretransplant DSBTs and three of these patients (8%) developed cytotoxic antibodies to their prospective donors. Neither hyperacute rejection nor hepatitis occurred in group B patients following DSBTs. One group B patient experienced a technical graft loss on the 1st postoperative day and was excluded from the rejection data. Graft survival at 3 and 6 months was 100 and 90% in group B recipients and 68% in group A recipients. All 12 group A graft failures resulted from acute nonreversible rejection episodes occurring during the first 3 months post-transplant. The three group B graft failures occurring at 6 months were attributable to chronic vascular rejection. Chronic rejection of the renal allograft was histologically documented in six group A and five group B patients by 6 months post-transplant. The use of stored donor blood offered a simple and easily monitored method of administering pretransplant DSBTs that was convenient to the donor and recipient. The administration of DSBTs did not appear to be harmful to the recipient. In fact, the use of pretransplant stored DSBTs in one-haplotype LRD renal transplantation appeared to improve the prospects of early graft survival in our experience.     

Successful steroid withdrawal half a year after kidney transplantation

We report two kidney transplant recipients with successful steroid withdrawal. They are living related donor transplant recipients. The first patient, a 37-year-old female, received the kidney from her HLA identical father. The second patient, a 44-year-old man, received the kidney from his HLA 1 haploidentical brother. Both patients were maintained on triple immunosuppressive drug therapy pior to withdrawal of steroid and subsequently were maintained on cyclosporine and azathioprine or mizoribine. Acute rejection occurred within the first 1 month and was treated with steroid bolus therapy successfully in both cases. The time of steroid withdrawal after transplantation was 6.5 months in the first patient and 5 months in the second patient. After steroid withdrawal their graft function remained stable and the graft specimens obtained by biopsy 8 months after withdrawal showed no signs of rejection; no side effects of steroid appeared. These results suggest that steroid withdrawal half a year after transplantation can be accomplished without jeopardizing graft function in selected living related donor transplant recipients.     

Declining incidence of wound infection in cadaveric renal transplant recipient

Over a five-year period 100 cadaveric renal transplants were performed. In 91 of these recipients, a prophylactic parenteral antibiotic (cefoperazone) was administered and closed wound drainage was used. Of these 91 patients, 33 received azathioprine/prednisone immunosuppression, whereas cyclosporine/prednisone with or without azathioprine was used in the remaining 58. The incidence of wound infections was significantly reduced from 12 per cent (4/33) in the azathioprine group to 1.7 per cent (1/58) in the cyclosporine group (p less than 0.01). When conventional immunosuppression (azathioprine/prednisone) is employed in renal transplantation, triple antibiotic prophylaxis that includes an aminoglycoside is most effective in preventing wound infections. A single non-nephrotoxic antibiotic, cefoperazone, offers similar protection in the cyclosporine/prednisone-treated renal transplant recipient.