大学生错畸形与口腔健康相关生存质量的相关性

目的调查错畸形与大学生口腔健康相关生存质量(OHRQoL)的相关性。方法从秦皇岛地区4所高校随机抽取610名无正畸史、缺失牙和颌面部畸形的大学生为研究对象。选用正畸治疗需要指数(IOTN)行牙颌检查,以口腔健康相关生存质量影响程度量表(OHRQoL-UK)对样本进行评估。结果 8.7%受试者自诉在过去1个月中,16个条目中至少有一项受到错畸形的负面影响。在生理、心理和社会三分项中,心理方面的分值最低。OHRQoL-UK表在总分值及三分项上与牙齿健康分值(IOTN-DHC)和牙齿美学分值(IOTN-AC)均呈负相关。结论错畸形客观检查的IOTN牙齿健康部分(IOTN-DHC)和主观自评的IOTN牙齿美学部分(IOTN-AC)均与OHRQoL呈负相关关系。IOTN-DHC与生理方面相关性最大,而IOTN-AC与心理方面相关性最大且无性别差异。     

Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion,self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life

Objectives: To measure the self-reported frequency and severity of bullying amongst patients referred for orthodontic treatment and to investigate whether there is a relationship between levels of self-reported bullying, malocclusion and need for orthodontic treatment and an individual's self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Design and setting: Cross-sectional study of an adolescent group referred for orthodontic assessment at three UK hospitals. Subjects and methods: Three hundred and thirty-six participants aged between 10 and 14 years were recruited. Validated questionnaires were used to measure the self-reported frequency and severity of bullying, self-esteem and OHRQoL. Orthodontic treatment need was assessed using IOTN. Results: The prevalence of bullying was 12·8%. Being bullied was significantly associated with Class II Division 1 incisor relationship (P?=?0·041),increased overbite (P?=?0·023),increased overjet (P?=?0·001)and a high need for orthodontic treatment assessed using AC IOTN (P?=?0·014).Bullied participants also reported lower levels of social competence (P<0·001),athletic competence (P<0·001), physical appearance related self-esteem (P<0·001)and general self-esteem (P<0·001). Higher levels of oral symptoms (P?=?0·032),functional limitations (P<0·001), emotional (P<0·001)and social impact (P<0·001) from their oral condition, resulting in a negative impact on overall OHRQoL (P<0·001),were also reported. Conclusions: Significant relationships exist between bullying and certain occlusal traits, self-esteem and OHRQoL.     

The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVES: The first objective was to assess whether having had orthodontic treatment affected the levels of oral health-related quality of life impacts in Brazilian adolescents. A second objective was to assess the relationship between a normative clinical measure of orthodontic treatment need and two measures of oral health-related quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Bauru, SP, Brazil, on 1675 randomly selected adolescents aged between 15 and 16 years. Adolescents were clinically examined using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Two oral health-related quality of life measures, namely the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) and the shortened version of the Oral Health Impacts Profile (OHIP-14) were used to assess the adolescents' oral health-related impacts. Multiple logistic regression was used in the data analysis. RESULTS: Adolescents who had completed orthodontic treatment reported less oral health impacts on their daily life activities than those currently under treatment or those who never had any treatment. Combining the IOTN index with either of the two oral health-related quality of life measures used in this study provided more information about the adolescents' perceived satisfaction with their appearance than the IOTN on its own. CONCLUSION: Current methods of assessing orthodontic need should be complemented by oral health-related quality of life measures with valid psychometric properties, and measures of perceived need.     

口腔健康相关生活质量调查在正畸学中的应用

口腔健康相关生活质量是反映口腔疾病及其防治对患者的身体功能、心理功能和社会功能等方面影响的综合评估.口腔正畸治疗对患者的生活质量有着显著影响,正畸患者在疗程中感受到功能限制、生理疼痛、心理不适、社会功能障碍和治疗后整体生活质量的改善.本文就口腔健康相关生活质量量表及正畸学相关的口腔健康相关生活质量研究方面作一综述.     

Model specification in oral health-related quality of life research

The aim of this study was to analyze conventional wisdom regarding the construction and analysis of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) questionnaires and to outline statistical complications. Most methods used for developing and analyzing questionnaires, such as factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha, presume psychological constructs to be latent, inferring a reflective measurement model with the underlying assumption of local independence. Local independence implies that the latent variable explains why the variables observed are related. Many OHRQoL questionnaires are analyzed as if they were based on a reflective measurement model; local independence is thus assumed. This assumption requires these questionnaires to consist solely of items that reflect, instead of determine, OHRQoL. The tenability of this assumption is the main topic of the present study. It is argued that OHRQoL questionnaires are a mix of both a formative measurement model and a reflective measurement model, thus violating the assumption of local independence. The implications are discussed.     

口腔扁平苔藓患者口腔健康相关生活质量的初步研究

目的通过口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP）-14中文版了解口腔扁平苔藓患者口腔健康相关生活质量情况,探讨其应用于口腔扁平苔藓临床诊疗的可靠性和准确性。方法采用OHIP-14中文版对51例口腔扁平苔藓患者进行问卷调查,同时采用视觉类比标尺（VAS）对疼痛程度进行评分,REU评分系统对病损情况进行评分。通过SPSS 16.0软件对量表的信度和效度进行统计分析。结果OHIP-14的得分为21.67±9.45,量表的内部一致性Cronbach’s α系数为0.901,因子分析提取的5个公因子与量表各领域有密切的逻辑关系,量表得分与REU分值和VAS分值间呈正相关关系（r=0.608,0.807;P<0.000）。结论OHIP-14中文版评测口腔扁平苔藓患者的口腔健康相关生活质量具有较好的信度和效度,可为病情评估提供参考。     

��ǻ����������������о������ڹ��ڵĿ�չ��״

口腔健康相关生活质量是近20年来口腔医学研究中备受关注的领域之一,然而相关研究在国内开展较少。本文对常用口腔健康相关生活质量量表、量表的翻译和验证、国内外口腔健康相关生活质量研究情况做一简要介绍。     

The relationship between oral conditions,masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in children

Objective

To evaluate the association between oral conditions, masticatory performance (MP) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in 8–12 year-old children.

Design

150 Brazilian scholars were examined for caries and malocclusions. MP was evaluated based on the ability to comminute an artificial test food followed by the determination of the median particle size (X₅₀) and particle distribution in different-sized sieves (“b”). OHRQoL was measured using the Brazilian versions 8–10 and 11–14 of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ), considering the following domains: oral symptoms (OS), functional limitations (FL), emotional well-being (EW) and social well-being (SW). Higher scores indicated worse OHRQoL. Data were submitted to Spearman's correlation test and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

There were significant positive correlations between the psychosocial and OS domains scores of the CPQ_8–10 and the number of decayed and missing teeth, respectively. The number of decayed teeth positively correlated with the number of missing teeth and the CPQ_11–14 scores. The number of decayed and missing teeth was significantly associated with higher CPQ_8–10 scores. Higher CPQ_11–14 overall scores were associated with female gender, higher FL domain scores were associated with the number of missing teeth, and higher X₅₀ values and EW domain scores were associated with female gender and the number of decayed teeth.

Conclusions

A higher number of missing teeth correlated with an inferior MP in older children. Children with a higher number of caries rated their oral health less favourably. Older females and those who broke the test material into smaller sizes were also more likely to report a worse OHRQoL, suggesting that the time allowed to reduce food appears to be a more influential factor on children’ perception of oral health than their ability to break down the test material into smaller sizes. Moreover, the subjectivity of functional domain and artificial nature of chewable test material could have influenced the test sensitivity.     

Demographic factors, denture status and oral health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association between denture status, demographic factors, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODS: OHRQoL was measured using the German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G, 53 items), which was administered in a personal interview to 2050 subjects (60% of eligible subjects responded) 16-79 years of age in a national survey. Median regression was used to analyze the influence of denture status (no, removable, complete dentures), age, gender, education (less than 10 years of schooling, 10-12 years, more than 12 years), and residential area (rural, urban) on the OHIP-G summary score. RESULTS: In bivariable analyses, compared to the base category, the OHIP-G median increased 8.0 U for subjects with removable dentures, 20.0 U for subjects with complete dentures, 1.7 U for each 10-year age period, 2.0 U for men, 3.0 U for less than 10 years of schooling (compared to > or =10 years.), and 1.0 U for urban areas (P < 0.05 for all effects except for residential area). In the multivariable analysis, compared to subjects without dentures, subjects with removable dentures had a 7.5 (95% CI: 5.2-9.8) higher OHIP-G median and subjects with complete dentures had a 18.5 (95% CI: 14.7-22.4) higher median when demographic variables were controlled. No demographic variables were statistically significant except for residential area (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Denture status was a stronger predictor for impaired OHRQoL than demographic variables and rendered age and education almost negligible in their influence on OHRQoL.     

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in oral disadvantage,a measure of oral health-related quality of life: 24-month incidence

OBJECTIVES: This paper estimates the incidence of oral disadvantage based on the subject's approach to dental care, sex, race, and financial status; identifies demographic and socioeconomic characteristics that were associated with oral disadvantage; and determines if these characteristics were differentially associated with the three domains of oral disadvantage. METHODS: The Florida Dental Care Study was a longitudinal study of oral health in diverse groups of persons who at baseline had at least one tooth, were 45 years or older, and were either African American or non-Hispanic white. Incidence rates, odds ratios, and 95 percent confidence intervals were used to describe oral disadvantage and its relation to race, income, and other key sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The strongest independent predictors of oral disadvantage were approach to dental care (problem-oriented attenders or regular), and situation if faced with an unexpected $500 dental bill. Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were differentially associated with each disadvantage domain. CONCLUSIONS: African Americans, females, rural residents, individuals who did not graduate from high school, individuals with limited financial resources, and problem-oriented dental attenders had significantly higher occurrences of oral disadvantage. Racial and sex disparities in oral disadvantage were largely explained by differences in approach to dental care and financial resources between these groups.     

Patterns of missing occlusal units and oral health-related quality of life in SDA patients

Summary  The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between patterns of missing occlusal units (OUs) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in subjects with the shortened dental arches (SDAs). Subjects with SDAs were recruited consecutively for 1 month from six university-based prosthodontic clinics. In total, 115 SDA subjects participated (mean age, 58·5 ± 10·0 years; 71% female). The location and number of missing teeth were examined and the number of missing OUs was calculated. To evaluate OHRQoL, the Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-J) was administered and the summary score of OHIP-J was calculated. The SDA subjects were categorized depending upon the anterior-posterior lengths of the missing or remaining OUs. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the OHIP-J differences between groups of subjects with various anterior–posterior SDA lengths. The analyses revealed that subjects who only lost the second molar contact exhibited significantly better OHRQoL than those who lost more teeth [coefficient: 11·1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2·8–19·2, P  = 0·02]. Furthermore a statistically significant group difference was observed between the groups with and without the first molar occlusal contact (coefficient: 12·8, 95% CI: 1·4 to 24·1, P  = 0·03). In conclusion, although our results are of exploratory nature and need validation, patterns of missing OUs are likely to be related to the OHRQoL impairment in SDA subjects with the presence of first molar contact having a particularly important role.     

Two-year incidence of oral disadvantage,a measure of oral health-related quality of life

Dental research has progressed from describing the burden of oral disease using traditional epidemiologic measures of incidence and prevalence, to measuring how oral disease, oral signs, and oral symptoms affect the daily activities and the overall quality of life of the individual. However, longitudinal evaluation of these associations remains rare. OBJECTIVES: To (i). describe the 2-year incidence and patterns of oral disadvantage; (ii). identify dimensions of oral health measures that are significant antecedents of oral disadvantage; and (iii). determine which oral health dimensions are the most strongly predictive of oral disadvantage. METHODS: The Florida Dental Care Study was a longitudinal study of oral health in diverse groups of persons who at baseline had at least one tooth and were 45 years or older. Incidence rates, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe oral disadvantage and its relation to other measures of oral health. RESULTS: Nearly one-half of the participants experienced oral disadvantage at least once during 24 months of follow-up. The strongest antecedents associated with oral disadvantage were toothache pain and chewing difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of oral disadvantage is substantial and consistent with the notion that oral health has a substantial impact on quality of life. Measures of oral pain and oral functional limitation were more strongly predictive of oral disadvantage than disease and tissue damage antecedents.     

Disparities in oral health-related quality of life in a population of Canadian children

OBJECTIVES: To assess socioeconomic disparities in the oral health-related quality of life in a group of Canadian children. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a study designed to assess the functional and psychosocial impact of traumatic dental injury. Clinical data were collected on a random sample of children during a school-based dental screening program that included measures of dental decay experience, treatment needs, dental trauma, fluorosis, and malocclusion. Children with dental trauma and a comparison group of trauma-free children were selected for follow-up. Their parents were mailed a questionnaire concerning the child's personal and family characteristics. Also enclosed was a questionnaire for the child that contained a short form of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ) 11-14. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to determine whether there were disparities in oral health-related quality of life according to household income. RESULTS: Complete data were collected from 370 children. Mean CPQ11-14 scores showed a gradient across income categories with children from low income households having poorer oral health-related quality of life. Children from households containing only one adult also had higher scores than children living with two or more adults. In both linear and logistic regression analyses household income and family structure remained significant predictors of CPQ11-14 scores after controlling for oral disease variables. Further analyses suggested that oral disorders had little impact on the health-related quality of life of higher income children but a marked impact on lower income children. The highest mean CPQ11-14 scores were observed among low income children with the more severe levels of oral disease. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that in this group of children there were socioeconomic disparities in oral health-related quality of life. A potential explanation may be differences in psychological assets and psychosocial resources.     

Oral health-related quality of life following orthognathic surgery for class III correction its relationship with cephalometric changes

The aim of this study was to investigate the cephalometric changes following orthognathic surgery for class III correction and to compare these with the changes in patient perceptions of their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Twenty-nine severe skeletal class III patients, who were candidates for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy, completed the Persian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile OHIP-14 questionnaire before any orthodontic treatment (T0) and at 6 months after the surgery (T1). Cephalometric analyses were performed at T0 and T1 and the changes in 13 hard and soft tissue profile indices were assessed by means of the paired t-test. The correlation between facial changes following treatment and the OHIP-14 item scores were tested by Pearson correlation analysis. The increase in upper lip protrusion following surgery was correlated with an increase in OHRQoL, especially in the domains of pronouncing words, taste, and diet, as well as the total OHIP-14 score. However, the increase in upper lip length and the decrease in lower lip protrusion correlated positively with worsening of some of the OHIP items. Although orthognathic surgery led to ideal cephalometric results, the patients’ OHRQoL was improved in some aspects and impaired in others.     

Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether Brazilian adolescents who had completed orthodontic treatment had lower levels of impacts on their oral health-related quality of life.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: The study was conducted in public and private secondary schools in Bauru-SP, Brazil.

Participants: 1675 randomly selected adolescents aged between 15 and 16 years.

Methods: Adolescents were clinically examined using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Two oral health-related quality of life measures, namely the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) and the shortened version of the Oral Health Impacts Profile (OHIP-14) were used to assess adolescents’ oral health-related impacts. Multiple logistic regression was used in the data analysis.

Results: A response rate of 100% was obtained. Adolescents who had completed orthodontic treatment had fewer oral health-related impacts compared to the other two groups. They were 1.85 times (95% CI 1.30 to 2.62) less likely to have an oral health impact on their daily life activities than adolescents currently under treatment or 1.43 (1.01 to 2.02) times than those who never had treatment.

Conclusions: Adolescents who had completed orthodontic treatment had a better oral health-related quality of life than those currently under treatment or those who never had treatment.     

Chewing function impacts oral health-related quality of life among institutionalized and community-dwelling Korean elders

Abstract – Objective The aim of this study was to assess the association of chewing ability to oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 (OHIP‐14) controlling for clinical oral health status, self‐reported health status, demographic factors, and socioeconomic conditions among community‐dwelling and institutionalized Korean elders. Methods This cross‐sectional study comprised a sample of 307 community‐dwelling and 102 institutionalized people over the age of 60, using a cluster sampling procedure. A questionnaire was implemented and a clinical oral examination was completed for each subject. The outcome variable of interest was the OHIP‐14 score, and its associations with chewing ability, objective oral health status, self‐reported health status, demographic factors, and socioeconomic conditions were assessed. Because of highly‐skewed distribution of the OHIP‐14 scores, nonparametric analytic methods were used. The final model was developed using a multivariable two‐level logistic regression model for a dichotomized OHIP‐14 score to account for the cluster sampling method applied to this study. Results The mean age of the participants was 75.4 years, with 67.7% being women. The median OHIP‐14 score was 7. Negative oral health impacts were experienced fairly often or very often by a total of 36.4% of elderly. In the final model, elders who could chew none to three and four to six foods among seven indicator foods were 3.4 (P = 0.010) and 2.0 (P = 0.040) times more likely, respectively, to have worse OHRQoL compared with elders who could chew all seven food types. Also significant associations with worse OHRQoL were shown for being concerned about oral health [Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.9, P = 0.002], fair or better self‐reported oral health (OR = 0.12, P = 0.002), very good/good self‐reported general health (OR = 0.38, P = 0.008), being married (OR = 2.0, P = 0.054), and having a favourable economic status (OR = 0.43, P = 0.042). Conclusions This study showed highly significant association between chewing ability and OHRQoL measured by the OHIP‐14 score after controlling for related factors. Amelioration of chewing ability might independently contribute to improving the OHRQoL of elders.     

Oral health-related quality of life of children with neutropenia

This study evaluated the oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) in children with neutropenia. Twenty-seven children with neutropenia were compared to 33 healthy, age-matched control subjects. Previously validated age- specific, multidimensional and self -reporting child OHQoL questionnaires were used. Overall and subscale scores were compared between the two groups. Respondents in the group of children with neutropenia reported that their disease had a significant impact on their oral health in terms of oral symptoms (p<0.0001), functional limitations (p<0.0001), and social well-being (p<0.0001). In global ratings, they rated their oral health to be markedly worse than that of the healthy subjects (p<0.0001). However, there was no difference between the groups in the extent to which their oral condition affected their lives overall. These results, along with responses to individual measures of social and emotional well-being, suggest that children in this group with neutropenia have psychologically adapted to the oral health challenges they experience because of their condition.     

Oral health-related quality of life in Germany

The prevalence of impaired oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in Germany is unknown. The aim was to determine the OHRQoL distribution in the population and to derive population-based norms. OHRQoL was measured using the German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G, 53 items) which was administered in a personal interview to 2050 subjects (response proportion: 60%) 16-79 yr of age. Subjects were sampled using a multistage sampling technique in a national survey. Prevalence was calculated for any impairment on the item (OHIP answer categories ranging from 'hardly ever' to 'very often') and for frequent problems (categories 'fairly often' and 'very often'). Norms for the OHIP-G summary score (sum of all item responses in the English-language OHIP, range 0-196) were described by percentiles. Past-month prevalence of any impairment in OHRQoL ranged from 13% to 46% across all items. Frequent problems were rare (/= 5 OHIP-G score points and 10% had >/= 38 points. For subjects with removable dentures the scores were 15 and 60 points, respectively, and for subjects with complete dentures, 23 and 85 points, respectively. The results provide the first overview of impaired OHRQoL in Germany.     

Oral health-related quality of life in patients seeking care for dentin hypersensitivity

Summary  The aim of the present study was to evaluate oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) impairment in patients seeking care for their hypersensitive teeth in comparison with general population subjects and to investigate the influence of gender and age on OHRQoL in these populations. Study participants were 656 patients without removable prosthodontics who sought treatment for their hypersensitive teeth in German dental offices. These patients were asked to complete the German form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G) prior to treatment. The sum of OHIP-G item responses (OHIP-G49, 0–196) characterized the OHRQoL impairment. Patients' OHIP summary scores were compared with those in a sample of the German general population ( n  = 1541). The influence of population (patients vs. general population subjects), gender and age was investigated using a multivariable linear regression model. Age presented a curvilinear association with OHRQoL, with lower OHIP scores associated with younger and older adults and higher OHIP scores (indicating impaired OHRQoL) associated with middle-aged adults in both the patient and general populations. Gender influence depended on the population, i.e. female general population subjects had lower OHIP scores than male general population subjects and female patients had higher OHIP scores than male patients. Mean OHIP summary scores indicated that patients with hypersensitive teeth reported considerably more impaired OHRQoL (approximately 22 OHIP units) than subjects in the general population. The present study suggests that the oral condition of hypersensitive teeth is significantly associated with impaired OHRQoL.     

Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVES: Using the item-impact method, we developed an alternative short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) that has good psychometric properties and minimal floor effects. METHODS: OHIP data were collected from a sample of older Canadians at two points in time. Data from the first administration were used to develop a 14-item short-form measure; data from the second compare the latter's psychometric properties with those of the original short form developed by Slade (1997), who used a controlled regression procedure. RESULTS: The short form based on the item-impact method had only two items in common with the short form derived from the regression approach and contained more high-prevalence items. The regression short form was subject to marked floor effects, while the impact short form had floor effects comparable to those of the full 49-item OHIP. The former discriminated between dentate and edentulous subjects, while the latter did not. Both discriminated between dentate subjects who did and did not wear dentures, those with and without dry mouth, and those with and without chewing problems. Both were also significantly associated with self-ratings of oral health, satisfaction with oral health, and self-perceived need for dental treatment. The strength of the associations was somewhat stronger with the regression short form, indicating that it performed better as a discriminatory instrument. However, because of its floor effects, it was markedly less sensitive to change than the impact short form. There was an indication that item-impact methods of shortening oral health-related quality of life measures produced more stable results across samples than the statistical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Because the content validity of short-form measures is always compromised, different short forms are required for different purposes and different patient populations. The regression short form developed by Slade (1997) is likely to be better when the aim is to discriminate, while the impact short form developed here may be preferable when the aim is to describe the oral health-related quality of life of populations or to detect change.