Analysis of the phenotypes of Jurkat clones with different TRAIL-sensitivities

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been shown to exert potent cytotoxic activity against many tumor cells but not normal cells. However, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL, and it has not been determined how this occurs. In the present study, we obtained three subgroups of Jurkat clones with TRAIL-sensitive, -partial resistant and -resistant phenotypes. We found that most TRAIL-resistant and -partial resistant clones expressed low levels of DR5, whereas most TRAIL-sensitive clones expressed high levels of Death Receptor (DR5). However, there were clones with a range of different TRAIL-sensitivities that had similar levels of DR5 expression. The expression levels of DR4 and the decoy receptors, DcR1 and DcR2, did not correlate with TRAIL sensitivities. We also compared the subgroups in terms of the expression of Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), the levels of activation of Receptor Interacting Protein (RIP) and caspases, and cleavage of Poly (ADP-Ribose)Polymerase (PARP). Basal expression levels of FADD were not significantly different among the subgroups. After treatment with TRAIL, both TRAIL-sensitive and partial resistant clones showed high levels of activation of caspase-3, caspase-8, RIP and PARP. Relative basal level and induced level of Phosphoprotein over Expressed in Diabetes/Phosphoprotein Enriched in Astrocytes (PED/PEA-15) after TRAIL treatment were compared in the clones. Basal levels of PED/PEA-15 expression were similar among sensitive, partial resistant and resistant clones. TRAIL did not change the PED/PEA-15 level in the clones. In addition, transduction and expression of the dominant negative form of the I-kBalpha gene did not change TRAIL-sensitivities. Our results showed that the expression levels of DR5, the activation levels of caspase-8, -3 and RIP were critical factors in determining TRAIL-sensitivities in Jurkat cells. The results of our study also suggest that cells with different TRAIL-sensitivities arise through multiple mechanisms even within a single cell line.     

Inhibition of DNA methylation sensitizes glioblastoma for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated destruction

Life expectancy of patients affected by glioblastoma multiforme is extremely low. The therapeutic use of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been proposed to treat this disease based on its ability to kill glioma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Here, we show that, differently from glioma cell lines, glioblastoma multiforme tumors were resistant to TRAIL stimulation because they expressed low levels of caspase-8 and high levels of the death receptor inhibitor PED/PEA-15. Inhibition of methyltransferases by decitabine resulted in considerable up-regulation of TRAIL receptor-1 and caspase-8, down-regulation of PED/PEA-15, inhibition of cell growth, and sensitization of primary glioblastoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Exogenous caspase-8 expression was the main event able to restore TRAIL sensitivity in primary glioblastoma cells. The antitumor activity of decitabine and TRAIL was confirmed in vivo in a mouse model of glioblastoma multiforme. Evaluation of tumor size, apoptosis, and caspase activation in nude mouse glioblastoma multiforme xenografts showed dramatic synergy of decitabine and TRAIL in the treatment of glioblastoma, whereas the single agents were scarcely effective in terms of reduction of tumor mass, apoptosis induction, and caspase activation. Thus, the combination of TRAIL and demethylating agents may provide a key tool to overcome glioblastoma resistance to therapeutic treatments.     

Ewing's sarcoma family tumors are sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and express death receptor 4 and death receptor 5

In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFTs) of children and adolescents to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing Ligand (TRAIL). TRAIL binds to death receptors (DRs) DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2. Either DR4 or DR5 can induce apoptosis, whereas DcR1 and DcR2 are considered inhibitory receptors. Nine of 10 ESFT cell lines, including several that were Fas resistant, underwent apoptosis with TRAIL through activation of caspase-10, capase-8 (FLICE), caspase-3, and caspase-9. In contrast to the Fas signaling pathway, caspase-10, but not caspase-8 or the Fas-associated death domain-containing molecule, was recruited to the TRAIL receptor-associated signaling complex. We found that 9 of 10 ESFT cell lines expressed both DR4 and DR5 by Western blotting, whereas the TRAIL-resistant line expressed only DR4. However, DR4 was absent from the cell surface in the resistant and two additional lines (three of five tested lines), suggesting that it may have been nonfunctional. On the contrary, DR5 was located on the cell surface in all four sensitive lines tested, being absent only from the cell surface of the resistant line that was also DR5-negative by Western blotting. In agreement with these findings, the resistance of the line was overcome by restoration of DR5 levels by transfection. Levels of DcR1 and DcR2 or levels of the FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP) did not correlate with TRAIL resistance, and protein synthesis inhibition did not sensitize the TRAIL-resistant line to TRAIL. Because these data suggested that sensitivity of ESFTs to TRAIL was mainly based on the presence of DR4/DR5, we investigated the presence of these receptors in 32 ESFT tissue sections by immunohistochemistry. We found that 23 of 32 tumor tissues (72%) expressed both receptors, 8 of 32 (25%) expressed one receptor only, and 1 was negative for both. Our finding of wide expression of DR4/DR5 in ESFT in vivo, in combination with their high sensitivity to TRAIL in vitro and the reported lack of toxicity of TRAIL in mice and monkeys, suggests that TRAIL may be a novel effective agent in the treatment of ESFTs.     

The PEA-15/PED protein regulates cellular survival and invasiveness in colorectal carcinomas

The PEA-15/PED (phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15 kD/phosphoprotein enriched in diabetes) protein is a multifunctional phosphoprotein involved in various signaling pathways which determine survival, proliferation, and migration of cancer cells. Here, we investigated the expression and cellular functions of PEA-15 in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). PEA-15 is expressed in the majority of human CRC, predominantly in well differentiated tumor areas. A tissue microarray analysis of 1262 human CRC specimens from the DACHS study showed that PEA-15 expression is significantly associated with a low pT stadium as defined by limited invasion into the bowel wall. Moreover, patients with PEA-15-positive CRC exhibited a significantly longer tumor-specific survival time. To investigate the functional relevance of PEA-15 expression on a cellular level, we over-expressed PEA-15 in several CRC cell lines. Increased expression of PEA-15 resulted in a strong inhibition of clonogenicity, proliferation, and invasiveness of CRC cells. These effects were associated with a PEA-15-dependent down-regulation of integrin αvβ5 as well as with elevated levels of the phosphorylated MAP kinase ERK1/2. Moreover, expression of PEA-15 resulted in significant protection from cell death induced by cytotoxic drugs (5-FU, cisplatin), by the death ligand TRAIL, or by serum withdrawal. In conclusion, the PEA-15 protein regulates invasiveness, proliferation, and apoptosis resistance in CRC cells. PEA-15 might play an important role in chemoresistance, progression and metastasis in CRC.     

Autocrine production of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 is required for survival and growth of thyroid cancer cells

Although CD95 and its ligand are expressed in thyroid cancer, the tumor cell mass does not seem to be affected by such expression. We have recently shown that thyroid carcinomas produce interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-10, which promote resistance to chemotherapy through the up-regulation of Bcl-xL. Here, we show that freshly purified thyroid cancer cells were completely refractory to CD95-induced apoptosis despite the consistent expression of Fas-associated death domain and caspase-8. The analysis of potential molecules able to prevent caspase-8 activation in thyroid cancer cells revealed a remarkable up-regulation of cellular FLIP(L) (cFLIP(L)) and PED/PEA-15, two antiapoptotic proteins whose exogenous expression in normal thyrocytes inhibited the death-inducing signaling complex of CD95. Additionally, small interfering RNA FLIP and PED antisense sensitized thyroid cancer cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis. Exposure of normal thyrocytes to IL-4 and IL-10 potently up-regulated cFLIP and PED/PEA-15, suggesting that these cytokines are responsible for thyroid cancer cell resistance to CD95 stimulation. Moreover, treatment with neutralizing antibodies against IL-4 and IL-10 or exogenous expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 of thyroid cancer cells resulted in cFLIP and PED/PEA-15 down-regulation and CD95 sensitization. More importantly, prolonged IL-4 and IL-10 neutralization induced cancer cell growth inhibition and apoptosis, which were prevented by blocking antibodies against CD95 ligand. Altogether, autocrine production of IL-4 and IL-10 neutralizes CD95-generated signals and allows survival and growth of thyroid cancer cells. Thus, IL-4 and IL-10 may represent key targets for the treatment of thyroid cancer.     

Cisplatin down-regulation of cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme-like inhibitory proteins to restore tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cells.

PURPOSE: Many melanoma cell lines and primary cultures are resistant to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms that control melanoma cell resistance and searched for chemotherapeutic drugs that could overcome the TRAIL resistance in melanoma cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined 21 melanoma cell lines and 3 primary melanoma cultures for their sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, and then tested cisplatin, chemptothecin, and etoposide for their synergistic effects on TRAIL sensitivity in resistant melanoma cells. RESULTS: Of 21 melanoma cell lines, 11 showed various degrees of sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through caspase-8-initiated cleavage of caspase-3 and DNA fragmentation factor 45. The remaining cell lines and primary cultures were resistant to TRAIL, but cisplatin, chemptothecin, and etoposide sensitized the resistant cell lines and primary cultures to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, which also occurred through the caspase-8-initiated caspase cascade. Of the two TRAIL death receptors (DR4 and DR5), melanoma cells primarily expressed DR5 on cell surface. Cisplatin treatment had no effects on cell surface DR5 expression or intracellular expression of Fas-associated death domain and caspase-8. Instead, cisplatin treatment down-regulated intracellular expression of the short form of cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) and inhibited phosphorylation of the long form of c-FLIP. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here indicate that cisplatin inhibits c-FLIP protein expression and phosphorylation to restore TRAIL-induced caspase-8-initiated apoptosis in melanoma cells, thus providing a new combined therapeutic strategy for melanomas.     

Doxorubicin potentiates TRAIL cytotoxicity and apoptosis and can overcome TRAIL-resistance in rhabdomyosarcoma cells

Doxorubicin (DOX) and ifosfamide (IFO) are the most active single agents in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is used for STS in the setting of isolated limb perfusions. Like TNF-alpha, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis. In contrast to TNF-alpha preliminary studies suggest that TRAIL lacks systemic side effects. The effects of TRAIL alone and in combination with DOX or 4-hydroxy-IFO were evaluated in the TNF-alpha sensitive rhabdomyosarcoma cell line KYM-1, its 5-fold TNF-alpha sensitive subline KD4 and its >150-fold TNF-alpha resistant subline 37B8R. Membrane expression of TRAIL-receptors DR4 (death receptor 4), DR5 (pro-apoptotic), DcR1 (decoy receptor 1), DcR2 (anti-apoptotic) was assessed by flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity was determined by microculture tetrazolium assays. Apoptosis assays were performed with acridine orange. DOX (doxorubicin) and 4-OH-IFO decreased survival in all cell lines; a 2-fold resistance was observed for both drugs in 37B8R. All cell lines expressed DR4 and DR5, but hardly any DcR1 or DcR2. TRAIL was cytotoxic in KYM-1, even more in KD4 and induced massive apoptosis; 37B8R was >500-fold resistant to TRAIL and little apoptosis could be observed. TRAIL plus DOX showed synergistic cytotoxicity in KYM-1 and 37B8R. TRAIL plus 4-OH-IFO showed addition in all three cell lines. DOX plus TRAIL-induced more cytotoxicity and apoptosis in all cell lines compared to TRAIL alone. In 37B8R, DOX overcame resistance to TRAIL. In KYM-1, KD4 and 37B8R, sensitivity and resistance to TNF-alpha and TRAIL parallels. TRAIL-resistance was independent from expression of TRAIL-receptors. DOX with TRAIL could overcome TRAIL-resistance in 37B8R cells.     

Thyroid carcinoma cells are resistant to FAS-mediated apoptosis but sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

Fas (APO-1/CD95) is a transmembrane protein of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)/nerve growth factor receptor superfamily that induces apoptosis in susceptible normal and neoplastic cells upon cross-linking by its ligand (FasL). TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a more recently identified member of the TNF superfamily that has been shown to selectively kill neoplastic cells by engaging two cell-surface receptors, DR4 and DR5. Two additional TRAIL receptors (DcR1 and DcR2) do not transmit an apoptotic signal and have been proposed to confer protection from TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We addressed the expression of Fas, DR4, and DR5 in thyroid carcinoma cell lines and in 31 thyroid carcinoma specimens by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, respectively, and tested the sensitivity of thyroid carcinoma cell lines to Fas- and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Fas was found to be expressed in most thyroid carcinoma cell lines and tissue specimens. Although cross-linking of Fas did not induce apoptosis in thyroid carcinoma cell lines, Fas-mediated apoptosis did occur in the presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, suggesting the presence of a short-lived inhibitor of the Fas pathway in these cells. Cross-linking of Fas failed to induce recruitment and activation of caspase 8, whereas transfection of a constitutively active caspase 8 construct effectively killed the SW579 papillary carcinoma cell line, arguing that the action of the putative inhibitor occurs upstream of caspase 8. By contrast, recombinant TRAIL induced apoptosis in 10 of 12 thyroid carcinoma cell lines tested, by activating caspase-10 at the receptor level and triggering a caspase-mediated apoptotic cascade. Resistance to TRAIL did not correlate with DcR1 or DcR2 protein expression and was overcome by protein synthesis inhibition in 50% of the resistant cell lines. One medullary carcinoma cell line was resistant to Fas-and TRAIL-induced apoptosis, even in the presence of cycloheximide, and to transfection of constitutively active caspase-8, suggesting a different regulation of the apoptotic pathway. Our observations indicate that TRAIL effectively kills carcinomas that originate from the follicular epithelium of the thyroid gland, by inducing caspase-mediated apoptosis, and may provide a potentially potent therapeutic reagent against thyroid cancer.     

Chemotherapeutic agents sensitize osteogenic sarcoma cells, but not normal human bone cells, to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis

Apo2L/TRAIL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of cytokines that induces death of cancer cells but not normal cells. Its potent apoptotic activity is mediated through its cell surface death domain-containing receptors, DR4 and DR5. Apo2L/TRAIL interacts also with 3 "decoy" receptors that do not induce apoptosis, DcR1, DcR2, which lack functional death domains, and osteoprotegerin (OPG). The aim of our study was to investigate the cytotoxic activity of Apo2L/TRAIL on established osteogenic sarcoma cell lines (BTK-143, HOS, MG-63, SJSA-1, G-292 and SAOS2) and in primary cultures of normal human bone (NHB) cells. When used alone, Apo2L/TRAIL at 100 ng/ml for 24 hr induced greater than 80% cell death in only 1 (BTK-143) of the 6 osteogenic sarcoma cell lines. In contrast, Apo2L/TRAIL-resistant cells were susceptible to Apo2L/TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in the presence of the anticancer drugs, Doxorubicin (DOX), Cisplatin (CDDP) and Etoposide (ETP) but not Methotrexate (MTX) or Cyclophosphamide (CPM). Importantly, neither Apo2L/TRAIL alone nor in combination with any of these drugs affected primary normal human bone cells under equivalent conditions. Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis, and its augmentation by chemotherapy in the resistant cell lines was mediated through caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation. Furthermore, Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis and its augmentation by chemotherapy was effectively inhibited by caspase-8 zIETD-fmk and caspase-3 zDEVD-fmk protease inhibitors and by the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk. The pattern of basal Apo2L/TRAIL receptor mRNA expression, or expression of the intracellular caspase inhibitor FLICE-inhibitory protein, FLIP, could not be readily correlated with resistance or sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis. However, the augmentation of Apo2L/TRAIL effects by chemotherapy was associated with drug-induced up-regulation of death receptors DR4 and DR5 mRNA and protein. No obvious correlation was seen between the expression of OPG mRNA or protein and susceptibility of cells to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Stable over-expression of a dominant negative form of the Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) in the Apo2L/TRAIL-sensitive BTK-143 cells completely inhibited Apo2L/TRAIL-induced cell death. Our results indicate that chemotherapy and Apo2L/TRAIL act synergistically to kill cancer cells but not normal bone-derived osteoblast-like cells, which has implications for future therapy of osteosarcoma.     

Tumor-specific down-regulation of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 is associated with dense promoter hypermethylation

TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) induces apoptosis in a large variety of cancer cells but not in most normal human cells. This feature makes TRAIL, a potential antitumor agent. TRAIL can bind to four different receptors, two pro-apoptotic death receptors (DRs), DR4 and DR5, and two antiapoptotic decoy receptors (DcRs), DcR1 and DcR2. Normal cells express all four of the receptors. The increased TRAIL sensitivity of tumor cells has been postulated to result from the lack of DcR expression. We studied the tumor-specific down-regulation of the TRAIL receptors DcR1 and DcR2, as well as DR4 and DR5, in a group of pediatric tumor cell lines [nine neuroblastoma and three peripheral primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors (PNETs)] and three cell lines from adult tumors. Lack of expression of DcR1 and DcR2 was widespread (13 of the 15 cell lines and 10 of 15, respectively), both in the adult tumor cell lines and in the pediatric tumor lines. DR4 and DR5 were expressed in 8 of 15 and 12 of 15 cell lines, respectively. To understand the tumor-specific down-regulation of the TRAIL receptors, the promoter regions were studied for possible methylation changes of their CpG islands. All normal tissues were completely unmethylated, whereas in the tumor cell lines, we found frequent hypermethylation of the promoter. For DcR1 and DcR2, we found dense hypermethylation in 9 (69%) of 13 and 9 (90%) of 10 of nonexpressing cell lines, respectively. DR4 and DR5 were methylated in 5 (71%) of 7 and 2 (67%) of 3 nonexpressing cell lines, respectively. Treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'deoxycytidine resulted in partial demethylation and restored mRNA expression. In addition, we performed mutation analysis of the death domains of DR4 and DR5 by sequencing exon 9. Mutations were not present in any of the neuroblastoma or PNET cell lines. A panel of 28 fresh neuroblastoma tumor samples also lacked expression of DcR1 and DcR2 in 85 and 74% of cases, respectively. Hypermethylation was observed in 6 (21%) of 28 for DcR1 and 7 (25%) of 28 for DcR2. DR4 and DR5 were both expressed in 22 of 28 tumors, and no promoter methylation was observed. These data suggest that hypermethylation of the promoters of DcR1 and DcR2 is important in the down-regulation of expression in neuroblastoma and other tumor types.     

Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines are resistant to Fas-induced apoptosis and highly sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

Seven pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cell lines were resistant to the induction of apoptosis via the Fas death receptor. In contrast, four of seven lines (RD, Rh1, Rh18, and Rh30) were highly sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-alpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). TRAIL induced apoptosis within 4 h and also reduced clonogenic survival, both reversible by caspase inhibitors. DR5 (but not DR4) was expressed at high level in all cell lines. Expression of the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 did not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity. All RMS lines expressed the adapter molecule FADD, and six of seven expressed procaspase-8. Expression of the inhibitory proteins c-FLIPL and c-FLIPs was high in three TRAIL-sensitive (RD, Rh1, and Rh30) and two TRAIL-resistant (Rh28 and Rh41) lines. All RMS lines expressed Bid and procaspases-3, -6, -7, and -9. Procaspases-8 and -10 were highest in TRAIL-sensitive RMS (RD, Rh1, and Rh30), and procaspase-10 was not expressed in Rh18, Rh36, or Rh41. TRAIL induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in TRAIL-sensitive Rh1 but not in TRAIL-resistant Rh41 cells. There was no correlation between expression of members of the Bcl-2 family (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Bax, and Bak) and TRAIL sensitivity. TRAIL-sensitive Rh18 expressed procaspase-8 in the absence of procaspase-10 and c-FLIP, and procaspase-10 was not detected in TRAIL-resistant Rh41 in the presence of procaspase-8 and c-FLIP. Data suggest that caspase-8 may be sufficient to deliver the TRAIL-induced apoptotic signal in the absence of both caspase-10 and c-FLIP (Rh18) but not in the presence of c-FLIP (Rh41). In RD, Rh1, and Rh30, the presence of c-FLIP may require amplification of the apoptotic signal via caspase-10.     

Pretreatment with paclitaxel enhances apo-2 ligand/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells by inducing death receptors 4 and 5 protein levels

We have demonstrated that Apo-2 ligand (Apo-2L)/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis of human prostate cancer PC-3, DU145, and LNCaP cells in a dose-dependent manner, with PC-3 cells displaying the greatest sensitivity to Apo-2L/TRAIL. Susceptibility of the prostate cancer cell types to Apo-2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis did not appear to correlate with the levels of the Apo-2L/TRAIL receptors death receptor (DR) 4 (TRAIL receptor 1) or DR5 (TRAIL receptor 2), decoy receptor (DcR) 1 and DcR2, Flame-1, or the inhibitors of apoptosis proteins family of proteins. Apo-2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis of PC-3 cells was associated with the processing of caspase-8, caspase-10, and the proapoptotic Bid protein, resulting in the cytosolic accumulation of cytochrome c as well as the processing of procaspase-9 and procaspase-3. Cotreatment with the caspase-8 inhibitor z-IETD-fmk or DR4:Fc significantly inhibited Apo-2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Treatment with paclitaxel or taxotere increased DR4 and/or DR5 protein levels (up to 8-fold) without affecting the protein levels of DcR1 and DcR2, Apo-2L/TRAIL, Fas, or Fas ligand. Up-regulation of DR4 and DR5 was not preceded by the induction of their mRNA levels but was inhibited by cotreatment with cycloheximide. Importantly, sequential treatment of PC-3, DU145, and LNCaP cells with paclitaxel followed by Apo-2L/TRAIL induced significantly more apoptosis than Apo-2L/TRAIL treatment alone (P < 0.01). This was also associated with greater processing of procaspase-8 and Bid, as well as greater cytosolic accumulation of cytochrome c and the processing of caspase-3. These findings indicate that up-regulation of DR4 and DR5 protein levels by treatment with paclitaxel enhances subsequent Apo-2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells.     

Pharmacological inhibition of Bcl-2 family members reactivates TRAIL-induced apoptosis in malignant glioma

The major aim of this study was to develop novel therapeutic approaches to potentiate and reactivate apoptosis induced by TNF-Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) in malignant glioma. Analysis of five glioma cell lines (U87, U251, U373, MZ-54 and MZ-18) indicated that only two of the cell lines were sensitive to apoptosis induced by TRAIL alone. TRAIL resistance was not correlated to expression levels of the death receptors DR4 and DR5 or the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2, suggesting that it was mediated by inactivation of TRAIL-induced downstream signalling. Activation of the BH3 only protein Bid and subsequent activation of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway are known to play a pivotal role in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Since this process is blocked by overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, we analyzed the therapeutic potential of BH3 mimetics in potentiating TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Treatment with TRAIL in combination with the specific Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1 and the Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor BH3I-2′ potently enhanced apoptosis in TRAIL-sensitive U87 cells in a dose-dependent fashion. TRAIL-induced apoptosis was significantly reactivated by HA14-1 and BH3I-2′ in one (U343) and two (MZ-54 and MZ-18) of three investigated TRAIL-insensitive cell lines, respectively. Knockdown of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Mcl-1 by RNA interference had no additional effect on apoptosis induced by TRAIL and HA14-1 in U87 and U343 cells. Our data indicate that Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL play fundamental roles in TRAIL resistance of malignant glioma and suggest that using TRAIL or agonistic TRAIL receptor antibodies in combination with BH3 mimetics may represent a promising approach to reactivate apoptosis in therapy-resistant high grade gliomas.     

Constitutively active Akt1 protects HL60 leukemia cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis through a mechanism involving NF-kappaB activation and cFLIP(L) up-regulation.

TRAIL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily which induces apoptosis in cancer but not in normal cells. Akt1 promotes cell survival and blocks apoptosis. The scope of this paper was to investigate whether a HL60 human leukemia cell clone (named AR) with constitutively active Akt1 was resistant to TRAIL. We found that parental (PT) HL60 cells were very sensitive to a 6 h incubation in the presence of TRAIL and died by apoptosis. In contrast, AR cells were resistant to TRAIL concentrations as high as 2 microg/ml for 24 h. Two pharmacological inhibitors of PI3K, Ly294002 and wortmannin, restored TRAIL sensitivity of AR cells. AR cells stably overexpressing PTEN had lower Akt1 activity and were sensitive to TRAIL. Conversely, PT cells stably overexpressing a constitutive active form of Akt1 became TRAIL resistant. TRAIL activated caspase-8 but not caspase-9 or -10 in HL60 cells. We did not observe a protective effect of Bcl-X(L) or Bcl-2 against the cytotoxic activity of TRAIL, even though TRAIL induced cleavage of BID. There was a close correlation between TRAIL sensitivity and intranuclear presence of the p50 subunit of NF-kappaB. Higher levels of the FLICE inhibitory protein, cFLIP(L), were observed in TRAIL-resistant cells. Both the cell permeable NF-kappaB inhibitor SN50 and cycloheximide lowered cFLIP(L)expression and restored sentivity of AR cells to TRAIL. Our results suggest that Akt1 may be an important regulator of TRAIL sensitivity in HL60 cells through the activation of NF-kappaB and up-regulation of cFLIP(L) synthesis.     

IFN-gamma induces cell death in human hepatoma cells through a TRAIL/death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway.

We demonstrated the induction of cell death in a hepatoma cell line by IFN-gamma and its possible mechanism. Among the 2 hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatoma cell lines, SNU-354 and SNU-368, IFN-gamma induced cell death and increased caspase-3 activity in SNU-368 but not in SNU-354. IFN-gamma induced several changes in the mRNA expression level of apoptosis-regulating genes, e.g., increased expression of Fas, caspase-1 and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). In particular, IFN-gamma potently increased the mRNA expression of TRAIL in both cell lines. However, it did not change the mRNA expression level of death-mediating TRAIL receptors, e.g., DR4 and DR5, which were constitutively expressed in both cell lines. In contrast, the decoy receptor DcR1 was expressed in SNU-354 but not in SNU-368, and its expression level in SNU-354 was increased by IFN-gamma. Another decoy receptor, DcR2, was constitutively expressed in both cell lines; however, its expression level in SNU-368 was decreased by IFN-gamma. In addition, exogenous recombinant TRAIL reduced viability in SNU-368, but not in SNU-354, cells. From these findings, we speculated that TRAIL up-regulation and the subsequent TRAIL-mediated apoptosis serve as a mechanism of IFN-gamma-induced cell death in SNU-368. To confirm this hypothesis, we demonstrated that soluble DR4-Fc fusion protein, a TRAIL pathway inhibitor, inhibited IFN-gamma-induced cell death in SNU-368. Our results demonstrated that IFN-gamma acts as an inducer of cell death through TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.     

DcR2 (TRAIL-R4) siRNA and adenovirus delivery of TRAIL (Ad5hTRAIL) break down in vitro tumorigenic potential of prostate carcinoma cells

High levels of decoy receptor 2 (DcR2; TRAIL-R4) expression are correlated with TRAIL resistance in prostate cancer cells. In addition, upregulation of TRAIL death receptor (DR4 and DR5) expression, either by ionizing radiation or chemotherapy, can sensitize cancer cells to TRAIL. Considering more than half of human cancers are TRAIL resistant, modulation of surface TRAIL receptor expression appears to be an attractive treatment modality to counteract TRAIL resistance. In this study, three siRNA duplexes targeting DcR2 receptor were tested. Ad5hTRAIL infections were performed to overexpress human full-length TRAIL to induce cell death, and the in vitro tumorigenic potential of prostate cancer cells was assessed using colony-forming assays on soft agar. The DU145 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines, which express high levels of DcR2, were resistant to Ad5hTRAIL-induced death. Downregulation of surface DcR2 expression by siRNA sensitized these prostate cancer cell lines to Ad5hTRAIL. In addition, DcR2 siRNA-mediated knockdown of DcR2, followed by Ad5hTRAIL infection, dramatically reduced the in vitro tumorigenic potential of prostate cancer cells. Collectively, our results suggest the potential for combining receptor-specific siRNA with TRAIL in the treatment of certain cancers.     

可溶性肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体诱导肝癌细胞凋亡的研究

方法 采用原位杂交方法检测肝癌组织、肝癌细胞株以及正常肝组织中TRAILR的表达。采用不同浓度TRAIL蛋白处理肝癌细胞株Hep2和SMMC7721,应用流式细胞仪和原位末端标记,观察经药物处理前后该细胞株的凋亡发生率。结果 60例肝癌组织及20例正常肝组织均表达死亡受体DR5和DR4,但肝癌组织DR表达量显著强于正常肝组织。54例(90．0％)肝癌组织不表达诱捕受体DcR1,25例(41．7％)肝癌组织不表达DcR2,而20例正常肝组织均表达DcR。肝癌组织中DR的高表达及DcR的低表达,不同于正常肝组织中DR的低表达及DcR的高表达,两者间差异有显著性。两种肝癌细胞株中均可检测到DR5、DR4、DcR2的表达,但DcR1表达缺失。肝癌组织中DR的表达与肿瘤的分化、肿瘤分期有关,低分化的肿瘤DR表达减少(P＜0．01),Ⅲ、Ⅳ期肿瘤DR表达显著低于I、Ⅱ期(P＜0．05)。DR表达与患者的性别、年龄、HBsAg阳性与否、AFP水平、肿瘤大小以及是否转移无关。经TRAIL(100ng/ml)处理24h,肝癌细胞凋亡发生率约10％,而Jurkat细胞凋亡率达70％以上,胆管癌细胞QBC939凋亡发生率约50％。结论 肝细胞肝癌普遍存在TRAILR的表达,并存在受体类型的表达差异。但单一的TRAIL治疗只能有限的诱导肝癌细胞HepG2、SMMC7721发生凋亡,HCC对TRAIL诱导的凋亡存在耐药现象。