利用背侧颊黏膜移植治疗女性尿道狭窄

最近的一些文献支持利用背侧颊黏膜移植的方法治疗女性尿道狭窄。 男性背侧颊黏膜移植疗法创始人Guido Barbagli和他意大利阿雷佐的同事在《美国泌尿外科杂志》2006年第10期上报道了一组接受移植背侧高嵌体颊黏膜的尿道成形术的女性患者。     

颊黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄的临床分析

目的 探讨利用游离口腔颊黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄的疗效.方法 2011年6月至2012年12月采用颊黏膜腹侧扩大替代尿道成形术治疗25例前尿道狭窄,狭窄段长度为3.5～10 cm,平均5.74 cm.术前耻骨上膀胱造瘘16例,余9例术前最大尿流率2.4～7.6 mL/s,平均4.3 mL/s.结果 术后随访3～18个月,平均6.5个月.术后患者排尿通畅22例(88％),尿动力学检查显示最大尿流率为14～28mL/s,平均19.4 mL/s.3例(12％)吻合口处狭窄,经历尿道扩张后,排尿通畅.所有患者均无感染及尿道皮肤瘘发生,口腔颊黏膜移植物均成活.结论 口腔颊黏膜可作为较理想的尿道替代物,适合长段或多段狭窄的尿道修复.     

舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接重建尿道治疗长段尿道狭窄

目的 探讨舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接尿道成形治疗多节段或长段尿道狭窄的安全性和治疗效果.方法 尿道狭窄患者11例,年龄24～56岁,平均32岁.其中前尿道长段狭窄7例,狭窄长度10～15 cm,平均12 cm;尿道2～3处狭窄4例.病程6个月～8年.取舌黏膜条与颊黏膜条拼接尿道成形治疗7例,舌黏膜条与包皮瓣拼接尿道成形治疗4例.结果 11例手术顺利.1例舌黏膜与包皮拼接尿道成形患者术后3个月并发尿道外口狭窄,经手术矫正后排尿通畅,术后8个月最大尿流率27.5 ml/s.余10例排尿通畅、尿线粗,术后随访5～12个月,平均10个月,最大尿流率21～36 ml/s,平均26.8 ml/s.结论 舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接尿道成形具有取材方便、患者创伤小的特占点,是治疗长段尿道律窄的较好术式.尤其适用于尿道多处狭窄者.     

唇黏膜补片修复前尿道狭窄的疗效观察

目的 探讨应用唇黏膜补片尿道成形术治疗复杂性前尿道狭窄的有效性。方法：2004年3月～2008年9月应用自体下唇黏膜补片行尿道成形术治疗复杂性前尿道狭窄27例。尿道狭窄长度为2．0～7．0cm,平均长度3．9cm。结果：术后随访5～30个月,平均14．1个月。排尿通畅22例（81．5％）,最大尿流率16．9～40．2ml／s,平均23．6ml／s;再次狭窄5例（18．5％）,其中近端吻合口狭窄2例,远端吻合口狭窄2例,分别予以尿道内切开及扩张后,最大尿流率保持在15ml／s以上;1例行黏膜管状尿道成形术患者出现管腔缩窄,予以再次行口腔颊黏膜替代后排尿通畅。下唇取材部位黏膜均愈合良好,1例患者出现口周麻木并持续6个月。结论：下唇黏膜取材方便,取材后供体部位并发症少,适于用作尿道狭窄成形术的替代物。     

口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄10年经验总结

目的 探讨口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的长期效果. 方法 2001年1月至2010年12月,应用口腔内黏膜(颊黏膜和舌黏膜)尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄255例.尿道狭窄段长度3 ～18 cm,平均6 cm.尿道成形采用保留原尿道板的扩大尿道成形术或埋藏黏膜条背侧替代尿道成形术.对49例尿道狭窄段≥8 cm者采取双侧颊黏膜拼接、颊粘膜与舌黏膜拼接或双侧连续长条舌黏膜尿道成形. 结果 术后随访8 ～120个月,平均37个月.230例患者排尿通畅,尿线粗,最大尿流率为16～51 ml/s,平均26 ml/s.尿道造影显示重建段尿道管腔通畅.总成功率90.2％.25例患者于术后1年内发生并发症,其中尿道再次狭窄17例,尿道皮肤瘘8例.17例尿道再狭窄患者中15例再次行口腔内黏膜尿道成形,2例吻合口狭窄行尿道内切开,术后排尿通畅;8例尿道皮肤瘘均接受尿瘘修补术后治愈. 结论 口腔颊黏膜和舌黏膜均是良好的尿道替代物,舌黏膜取材较颊黏膜更为便利;口腔内多种黏膜的组合移植重建尿道是治疗长段前尿道狭窄( ≥8 cm)的有效方法.     

应用阴茎皮瓣结合颊黏膜游离移植治疗阴茎段尿道狭窄

目的总结应用阴茎皮瓣结合颊黏膜游离移植治疗阴茎段尿道狭窄的临床效果。方法2006年3月-2007年12月,收治6例尿道下裂修复术后阴茎段尿道狭窄患者。年龄3～26岁,均为阴茎型尿道下裂,于修复术后2～10个月出现排尿困难。采用阴茎皮肤脱套形成的阴茎皮瓣结合大小为2cm×1cm～4cm×1cm的自体全厚颊黏膜游离移植方法治疗,术后保留高弹硅胶尿道支架管2～3周。结果5例术后切口Ⅰ期愈合,无并发症发生,术后排尿满意;1例术后3d切口出现轻度感染,予冲洗引流等处理2周后愈合,术后1个月尿线变细,经约2个月尿道扩张后,正常排尿。患者均获随访,随访时间6～10个月。患者自述排尿正常,尿流成线,尿线较粗,排尿后膀胱无明显尿液残余。结论阴茎皮瓣结合颊黏膜游离移植是一期治疗阴茎段较短范围尿道狭窄的可行方法之一。     

舌黏膜补片治疗复杂性尿道狭窄的疗效观察

目的：探讨使用舌黏膜补片尿道成形治疗复杂性尿道狭窄的有效性。方法：2006年12月～2009年1月应用舌黏膜补片法治疗复杂性前尿道狭窄患者36例。结果：术后随访3～25个月，平均13．6个月。2例术后出现尿瘘，经再次手术修补后好转；另2例术后出现尿道狭窄，经尿道扩张后治愈。余者术后排尿通畅，平均最大尿流率达23．8ml／s。结论：舌黏膜具有取材方便、取材部位并发症少等优点，是一种治疗前尿道狭窄较好的替代物。     

口颊黏膜在尿道重建中的应用

随着尿道重建技术的不断改进,口颊黏膜替代尿道成形术逐渐成为前尿道缺损修复的最佳选择。本文主要对口颊黏膜的优势特点作一介绍,并阐述口颊黏膜替代尿道成形术在前尿道狭窄和尿道下裂中的临床应用和进展。     

舌黏膜尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄（附80例报告）

目的：研究舌黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的有效性和安全性。方法：2006年8月～2008年12月采用舌黏膜尿道成形治疗80例前尿道狭窄,尿道狭窄段2．5～18cm,其中30例为长段尿道狭窄（9～18cm）采用双侧舌黏膜或舌黏膜与颊黏膜或与带蒂包皮拼接尿道成形治疗。尿道成形采用两种术式：保留原尿道板的扩大尿道腔37例;埋藏黏膜条43例。结果：术后随访4～30（平均16．8）个月,7例发生并发症,其中尿瘘4例,再次发生尿道狭窄3例,其余患者排尿通畅,最大尿流率从15．2～54．6（平均28．7）ml／s。结论：舌黏膜是一种修复前尿道狭窄较好的尿道替代物,双侧舌黏膜尿道成形能成功治疗长段、复杂性尿道狭窄。     

镶嵌式唇黏膜瓣尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄

目的：探讨唇黏膜在前尿道狭窄中的应用及效果。方法：对8例前尿道狭窄患者采用镶嵌式唇黏膜尿道成形术治疗。手术以Snodgrass尿道成形术为基础,将狭窄段的尿道完全敞开,取游离的自体唇黏膜瓣镶嵌于背侧劈开的“尿道板”后卷管形成的新尿道。结果：全部病例术后均无明显的尿道狭窄,无尿道憩室形成和尿道口黏膜增生外翻。结论：镶嵌式唇黏膜尿道成形术兼有Snodgrass尿道成形术和唇黏膜尿道成形术的优点,是治疗前尿道狭窄的好方法。     

应用口腔颊黏膜Ⅰ期修复女童复杂性前尿道缺损(附3例报告)

目的：探索颊黏膜在修复女童复杂性前尿道缺损中的应用价值。方法：采用部分耻骨劈开联合阴道前庭切口，截取相应大小的口腔颊黏膜作管状成形I期修复女童前尿道缺损3例。结果：3例女童术后均排尿通畅，最大尿流率为l9．6—24．4m1／s，平均为20．5m1／s，尿道造影示尿道通畅。结论：口腔颊黏膜具有取材方便、对患者创伤小、抗感染能力强等特性，是一种较好的尿道替代材料，尤其适合尿道狭窄段＜5cm的患者。     

Bulbar urethroplasty with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft and fibrin glue

OBJECTIVES: We describe a new surgical technique with the use of fibrin glue for bulbar urethra reconstruction using a dorsal buccal mucosal onlay graft. METHODS: Six patients with a mean age of 43 yr underwent bulbar urethroplasty with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft and fibrin glue. The urethra was mobilised from the corpora cavernosa and opened along its dorsal surface. The buccal mucosal graft was applied on the corpora cavernosa using 2 ml of fibrin glue. Two interrupted polyglactin 5-0 sutures were used to fix the apices of the graft to the underlying albuginea of the corpora cavernosa. The urethra was rotated back to cover the graft and an adjunctive fibrin glue was injected over the urethra. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 100 min (range, 90-120 min). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Voiding cystourethrography was performed when the catheter was removed 2 wk after surgery. Urine culture, uroflowmetry, and urethrography were repeated after 6 and 12 mo and annually thereafter. Mean follow-up was 16 mo (range, 12-24 mo). No restrictures at the anastomotic sites were demonstrated in any of the patients 6 and 12 mo after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fibrin glue represents a slight but significant step toward perfecting the surgical technique of bulbar urethral reconstruction.     

游离黏膜组织重建尿道治疗复杂性尿道狭窄的临床研究

目的 探讨利用游离黏膜一期尿道成形治疗复杂性尿道狭窄或闭锁的疗效。方法 2000年8月至2004年7月采用2种游离黏膜一期尿道成形术治疗73例复杂性尿道狭窄。术前42例已行耻骨上膀胱造瘘，余31例最大尿流率1．2～6．5ml／s。用游离结肠黏膜(n=22)重建尿道长10～18cm，平均13cm；用口腔黏膜(n=51)重建尿道长3～11cm，平均5cm。术后随访分别行逆行尿道造影及尿流率，部分患者行尿道镜检查。结果随访2～48个月，平均19个月。术后排尿通畅67例(91．8％)。发生再次狭窄4例，其中结肠黏膜重建者1例，口腔黏膜重建者3例；排尿欠畅2例，定期行尿道扩张；尿道皮肤瘘2例；结肠腹壁瘘1例。1例结肠黏膜重建尿道者术后47个月移植物活检示结肠黏膜的组织形态学基本无变化。结论口腔与结肠黏膜均可作为较理想的尿道替代物，口腔黏膜较适合狭窄段不长的尿道修复，结肠黏膜较适合复杂性超长段尿道狭窄或缺损的治疗。     

Oral mucosal grafts urethroplasty for the treatment of long segmented anterior urethral strictures

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using oral mucosal grafts for urethroplasty in the treatment of complex segmented urethral strictures. Methods  Between January 2002 and January 2008, 25 cases of long or multi-segmented urethral strictures (10–18 cm, mean 11.72) were treated using combined two oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. Of the 25 patients, combined double buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was performed in nine patients, double lingual mucosal graft (LMG) urethroplasty in seven patients and combined lingual and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in nine patients. Results  Follow-up was obtained for 6–72 months (mean 26.83) post-operatively. Urethrocutaneous fistulas developed in two patients. Urethral strictures developed in one patient undergoing BMG urethroplasty; the patient underwent five urethral dilations, after which he voided well with a urinary peak flow of 26.4 ml/s. Meatal stenosis developed in one patient undergoing LMG and a second operation was required, after which the patient voided well (urinary peak flow of 28.7 ml/s). The other patients voided well and urinary peak flow rates ranged from 16.8 to 49.2 ml/s (mean 28.65 ml/s). Conclusion  Combined two oral mucosal grafts substitution urethroplasty is an effective technique for the treatment of long, segmented urethral strictures.     

Dorsal inlay buccal mucosal graft (Asopa) urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture

Asopa described the inlay of a graft into Snodgrass’s longitudinal urethral plate incision using a ventral sagittal urethrotomy approach in 2001. He claimed that this technique was easier to perform and led to less tissue ischemia due to no need for mobilization of the urethra. This approach has subsequently been popularized among reconstructive urologists as the dorsal inlay urethroplasty or Asopa technique. Depending on the location of the stricture, either a subcoronal circumferential incision is made for penile strictures, or a midline perineal incision is made for bulbar strictures. Other approaches for penile urethral strictures include the non-circumferential penile incisional approach and a penoscrotal approach. We generally prefer the circumferential degloving approach for penile urethral strictures. The penis is de-gloved and the urethra is split ventrally to exposure the stricture. It is then deepened to include the full thickness of the dorsal urethra. The dorsal surface is made raw and grafts are fixed on the urethral surface. Quilting sutures are placed to further anchor the graft. A Foley catheter is placed and the urethra is retubularized in two layers with special attention to the staggering of suture lines. The skin incision is then closed in layers. We have found that it is best to perform an Asopa urethroplasty when the urethral plate is ≥1 cm in width. The key to when to use the dorsal inlay technique all depends on the width of the urethral plate once the urethrotomy is performed, stricture etiology, and stricture location (penile vs. bulb).     

Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: results of a prospective single center study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin (PS) or buccal mucosa (BM) free grafts in the repair of adult bulbourethral strictures. METHODS: From January 1998 to March 2003, 30 patients with bulbar urethral strictures underwent urethral reconstruction with PS (17) or with BM free graft (13). Follow-up was done at 6, 12 and 18 months postoperatively, and every year subsequently. Success was defined as normalization of IPSS and a stable Q(max) value >20 ml/s. Any further instrumentation for stricture recurrence was considered a failure. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 51 months (20-74). The overall success rate was 80% (85% in the BM and 76% in the PS group). Improvement of uroflowmetry, IPSS and QoL did not show a significant difference between the two groups. A significant improvement of the orgasmic function domain of the IIEF was found in patients treated with a PS graft. Post-operative complications were lip hypoesthesia (30%), retraction of the ventral skin of the penis (7%), post-voiding dribbling (8% with BM graft, and 7%, with PS graft). Six patients, 2 with BM (15%) and 4 with PS graft patch (24%) required further treatment due to stricture recurrence. CONCLUSION: Results of PS or BM graft are comparable at 18 month follow-up, although orgasmic function is significantly improved in patients receiving a PS graft. Nevertheless, with extended follow-up, the use of PS seems to be associated with a higher failure rate.     

Surgical techniques in substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures

OBJECTIVES: Since the resurgence in the use of buccal mucosa (BM) in substitution urethroplasty in the late 1980s and early 1990s, there has been controversy as to which surgical technique is the most appropriate for its application.METHODS: The authors performed an updated literature review. Several centres have published widely on this topic, and the points considered include the use BM in dorsal onlay grafts, ventral onlay grafts, and tubularised grafts and the role of two-stage procedures.RESULTS: In experienced hands, the outcomes of both dorsal onlay grafts and ventral onlay grafts in bulbar urethroplasty are similar. The dorsal onlay technique is, however, possibly less dependent on surgical expertise and therefore more suitable for surgeons new to the practice of urethroplasty. The complications associated with ventral onlay techniques can be minimised by meticulous surgical technique, but in series with longer follow-up, complications still tend to be more prevalent. In penile urethroplasty, two-stage dorsal onlay of BM (after complete excision of the scarred urethra) still provides the best results, although in certain circumstances a one-stage dorsal onlay procedure is possible. In general, ventral onlay of BM and tube graft procedures in the management of penile strictures are associated with much higher rates of recurrence and should therefore be avoided.CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands the results of the ventral and dorsal onlay of BM for bulbar urethroplasty are equivalent. Two-stage procedures are preferable in the penile urethra, except under certain circumstances when a one-stage dorsal onlay is feasible.