Limb loss with patent infra-inguinal bypasses

To determine systemic and local risk factors that contribute to limb loss despite a patent infra-inguinal bypass graft and how to prevent it, we reviewed 987 patients who underwent infra-inguinal bypasses at our institution. Seventy-five (7.6%) patent grafts failed to achieve a healed foot despite exhaustive attempts to do so and these patients underwent major amputation either above the knee (AKA) or below the knee (BKA). In 525 femoro-popliteal bypasses, there were 38 major amputations (29 BKA; 9 AKA) with a patent graft; in 462 femoro-distal bypasses, there were 37 amputations (22 BKA; 15 AKA) with a patent graft. The remaining 912 patients with limb salvage as well as all the patients with limb loss were evaluated with regard to systemic risk factors, quality of the run-off from the popliteal artery, continuity of the tibial artery into the arch as demonstrated on arteriography, the haemodynamic improvement obtained postoperatively, and the presence and extent of necrosis in the foot. The presence of diabetes, extensive pedal necrosis and advanced infection predispose to limb loss despite a patent lower extremity bypass graft. Patients who lost their limbs despite a functioning bypass to an isolated popliteal segment had significantly less pronounced haemodynamic improvement postoperatively. An early graft extension to a reconstituted tibial or peroneal artery or a direct bypass to a distal tibial or peroneal artery may reduce the incidence of limb loss in this setting. When a patent bypass to an isolated tibial or peroneal artery segment failed to relieve foot ischaemia, limb salvage was achieved by a distal extension to plantar arteries.     

Early experience with popliteal to infrapopliteal bypass for limb salvage

In an attempt to improve graft patency and limb salvage in patients with isolated tibial vessel and/or popliteal-tibial vessel occlusive disease, bypass grafts from the popliteal or distal superficial femoral artery to infrapopliteal arteries were used in patients requiring bypass for limb salvage. During a 2 1/2-year period, 23 patients with patent axial vessels and hemodynamically normal inflow to the level of the knee underwent such bypasses. Cumulative graft patency and limb salvage rates at 31 months were 84% and 70%, respectively. Five of the six patients who required below-knee amputation did so because of progressive gangrene in the presence of a patent bypass. Short bypasses between the popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries can significantly contribute to limb salvage in patients with tibial vessel occlusive disease and may be particularly useful in patients with saphenous veins too short for longer bypasses.     

Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions

Autologous saphenous vein (ASV) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were compared in 845 infrainguinal bypass operations, 485 to the popliteal artery and 360 to infrapopliteal arteries. Life-table primary patency rates for randomized PTFE grafts to the popliteal artery paralleled those for randomized ASV grafts to the same level for 2 years and then became significantly different (4-year patency rate of 68% +/- 8% [SE] for ASV vs. 47% +/- 9% for PTFE, p less than 0.025). Four-year patency differences for randomized above-knee grafts were not statistically significant (61% +/- 12% for ASV vs. 38% +/- 13% for PTFE, p greater than 0.25) but were for randomized below-knee grafts (76% +/- 9% for ASV vs. 54% +/- 11% for PTFE, p less than 0.05). Four-year limb salvage rates after bypasses to the popliteal artery to control critical ischemia did not differ for the two types of randomized grafts (75% +/- 10% for ASV vs. 70% +/- 10% for PTFE, p greater than 0.25). Although primary patency rates for randomized and obligatory PTFE grafts to the popliteal artery were significantly different (p less than 0.025), 4-year limb salvage rates were not (70% +/- 10% vs. 68% +/- 20%, p greater than 0.25). Primary patency rates at 4 years for infrapopliteal bypasses with randomized ASV were significantly better than those with randomized PTFE (49% +/- 10% vs. 12% +/- 7%, p less than 0.001). Limb salvage rates at 3 1/2 years for infrapopliteal bypasses with both randomized grafts (57% +/- 10% for ASV and 61% +/- 10% for PTFE) were better than those for obligatory infrapopliteal PTFE grafts (38% +/- 11%, p less than 0.01). These results fail to support the routine preferential use of PTFE grafts for either femoropopliteal or more distal bypasses. However, this graft may be used preferentially in selected poor-risk patients for femoropopliteal bypasses, particularly those that do not cross the knee. Although every effort should be made to use ASV for infrapopliteal bypasses, a PTFE distal bypass is a better option than a primary major amputation.     

Randomized clinical trial of distal anastomotic interposition vein cuff in infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine the effect of a Miller vein cuff at the distal anastomosis on the medium- to long-term patency and limb salvage rates of femoral to above-knee and femoral to below-knee popliteal artery polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypasses. METHODS: This study involved extended follow-up of the original cohort of patients included in a previously reported multicentre randomized clinical study. Outcome measures were bypass graft patency and limb salvage. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one bypass operations were originally randomized. For this study, full data were available on 235 (120 with a Miller cuff, 115 without). The cumulative 5-year patency rate for above-knee bypasses with a Miller cuff was 40 per cent, compared with 42 per cent for non-cuffed bypasses (P = 0.702). The cumulative 3-year patency rate for below-knee bypasses with a Miller cuff was 45 per cent, compared with 19 per cent for non-cuffed bypasses (P = 0.018). A Miller cuff had no significant effect on limb salvage for above-knee or below-knee bypasses. CONCLUSION: Three-year patency rates of femoral to below-knee popliteal PTFE bypasses were improved by a Miller cuff. Miller cuffs had no effect on patency rates for femoral to above-knee popliteal bypasses at 5 years and did not improve limb salvage in either group.     

Linton patch angioplasty. An adjunct to distal bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts have shown promise in bypasses to the popliteal and tibial arteries, but a significant incidence of immediate and late graft failure has limited general acceptance. Compliance differences between the PTFE graft and artery may present technical difficulties in small vessel anastomosis, as well as being implicated in late development of intimal hyperplasia. A retrospective study of 68 patients who had bypass to the distal popliteal and tibial arteries using PTFE grafts with adjunctive distal patch angioplasty was undertaken. Operation was done for limb salvage in 85%. Runoff was marginal in 69%. A venous patch was sutured to the distal artery and the PTFE graft was then sutured into an opening in the proximal portion of the patch. There was one early graft occlusion. Cumulative patency was 97% at 1 month, 92% at 3 months, 87% at 6 months, 74% at 12 months, and 65% at 24, 36, and 48 months. A distal autogenous vein patch permits precise suturing of the distal anastomosis and minimizes technical difficulties leading to early graft failure. Improvement of the compliance mismatch of the PTFE graft and artery may impede the unwelcome development of intimal hyperplasia at the distal anastomotic site. The adjunctive use of a distal patch has resulted in excellent immediate graft patency, despite a high incidence of poor run-off and limb salvage situations.     

Preferential use of ePTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts

We have used polytetrafluoroethylene preferentially for bypasses to the above-knee popliteal artery since 1979. Since this approach has recently been challenged, we reviewed our experience with 138 grafts in 128 patients. The majority (74%) of patients were male with a mean age of 63.2 years. Risk factors included: smoking (85%), hypertension (55%), diabetes mellitus (45%), and coronary artery disease (41%). The indications for operation were disabling claudication (18%), rest pain (42%), gangrene/tissue loss (33%), and miscellaneous (7%). Perioperative (30 day) mortality was 3% and morbidity (excluding amputation or graft failure) was 5%. Patients were followed for up to eight years with a mean follow-up of 22.1 months. Grafts which remained patent, but did not prevent major amputation, were classified as failed. Primary patency was 75% at one year and 54% at five years. Limb salvage was 88% at one year and 70% at five years. Risk factors, indication for operation and arteriographic runoff had no statistically significant impact on short- or long-term patency. However, bypass grafts to isolated popliteal segments had a significantly (p=0.025) increased perioperative failure rate compared to all other grafts. Our data support the continued use of polytetrafluoroethylene for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass except perhaps in patients who require grafting to an isolated popliteal segment where higher early failure rates were seen.     

Are there angiographic predictors of success for vein bypass to the peroneal artery?

In order to evaluate the effect of angiographic run-off upon peroneal artery autogenous vein bypass patency and subsequent limb salvage, 53 autogenous vein peroneal artery bypasses performed for ischemic tissue loss were reviewed. All preoperative angiograms were evaluated according to three separate angiographic scoring systems that previously had been designed to quantify the severity of runoff resistance. None of the three scoring systems predicted either early bypass occlusion and/or major amputation. The cumulative 18-month primary patency and 24-month secondary patency rates were 71% and 90%, respectively. The 24-month limb salvage rate was 81%. Initial and intermediate-term salvage of limbs with ischemic tissue loss can be achieved by peroneal artery bypass. Angiographic scoring systems were poor predictors of bypass failure or major amputation.     

Sequential grafts for limb salvage in the presence of widespread occlusive vascular disease. A review of twenty patients.

Twenty patients with widespread occlusive vascular disease received sequential bypass grafts for lower-limb salvage. In 16 patients an isolated common femoral or profunda segment was perfused by a proximal graft and run-off was augmented by femoropopliteal bypass. In 4 a femoropopliteal bypass constituted the proximal component perfusing an isolated popliteal segment, run-off being increased by a popliteal-to-tibial graft. Dacron, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (Gore-Tex), and autogenous vein grafts were used. The mean period of follow-up was 10.6 +/- 7 months and 70% of the limbs were salvaged. Thirteen graft systems remain currently patent, 4 have thrombosed, 2 patients died with patent grafts, and 1 required amputation despite graft patency.     

Comparison of expanded PTFE and vein grafts in lower extremity arterial reconstructions

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypasses were used in a series of arterial reconstructions to the popliteal artery (45) and to arteries below that level (11). These were performed in high-risk situations in patients who lacked a suitable saphenous vein. Vein bypasses were performed in a comparable series of high-risk situations in patients having a suitable autologous saphenous vein (45 to the level of the popliteal artery and 11 to an artery below that level). PTFE patency rates at 4-14 months were 43 to 45 (96%) for the femoro-popliteal reconstructions (with a limb salvage rate of 39 to 45 or 87%) and 5 of 11 (45%) for the distal bypasses. Saphenous vein bypass patency rates at 8-14 months were 39 of 45 (87%) for the femoropopliteal reconstructions (with a limb salvage rate of 36 of 45 or 80%) and 5 of 11 (45%) for the distal bypasses. These results justify continued use of PTFE grafts in patients without saphenous veins who require lower extremity arterial reconstructions for limb salvage. The exact place of PTFE grafts in arterial reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity definition based on longer periods of observation.     

Long-term results of infragenicular bypasses with autogenous vein originating from the distal superficial femoral and popliteal arteries

Forty-nine bypasses originating from the distal superficial femoral artery or popliteal artery in 46 patients were reviewed to examine late patency, limb salvage, and factors leading to graft failure. Operations were performed because of tissue loss in 86%, rest pain in 12%, and limiting claudication in 2% of limbs. Proximal anastomosis was from the distal superficial femoral artery in 12% and the popliteal artery in 88%. Distal anastomosis was to the below-knee popliteal artery or proximal tibial vessels in 20% and the distal tibial vessels in 80%. Life-table analysis showed a primary patency rate of 83%, 62%, and 41%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rate of limb salvage at 6 years for all grafts was 69%. Cox proportional hazards analysis determined that stenosis of 20% or greater in the proximal superficial femoral artery before bypass was a significant risk factor for graft failure (p = 0.02) despite the presence of normal intra-arterial pressure at the site of the proximal anastomosis at the time of bypass. Long-term survival in these patients was low, with a 6-year survival rate of only 24%. Infragenicular bypasses originating from the distal superficial femoral artery or the popliteal artery can be performed with patency and limb salvage rates comparable to bypasses originating from the common femoral artery. These bypasses are more likely to fail when performed in the presence of a stenosis 20% or greater in the superficial femoral or popliteal artery proximal to the graft origin.     

Arterial reconstruction of vessels in the foot and ankle.

OBJECTIVE: This study demonstrated that arterial reconstruction of vessels of the foot and ankle can preserve the majority of ischemic extremities with extensive tibial and peroneal occlusive disease and patent pedal arteries. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There are successful reports of bypass procedures to the ankle and foot, but despite this, these procedures have not gained widespread acceptance among surgeons performing infra-inguinal revascularization. Primary amputation is often offered for such patients. For this reason, the authors have reviewed their experience with bypasses to the foot and ankle. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 75 arterial bypasses (5 bilateral), done since 1985, to the ankle and foot in 70 patients (38 males and 32 females). Fifty-four (77%) of the patients were diabetic. The age ranged from 55 to 95 years. Twenty-six (37%) were older than 80 years. The patients were selected for operative intervention because of severe tibioperoneal occlusive disease with ischemic rest pain or gangrene of the foot. Digital subtraction arteriography facilitated visualization of distal vessels. Operative principles included regional anesthesia, autogenous graft material, short bypass, non-traumatic vessel occlusion, selective operative arteriography, tension free ankle and foot skin closure, and concomitant conservative debridement of infected devitalized tissue. Incomplete pedal arch did not influence decision for operation. Indications for operation were: gangrene, 42 (56%); non-healing ulcer, 21 (28%); and rest pain, 12 (16%). Graft material was in situ greater saphenous vein, 40 (53%); translocated greater saphenous vein, 19 (25%); reversed greater saphenous vein, 11 (15%); and arm vein, lesser saphenous vein or vein patch, 5 (7%). Donor artery was popliteal, 30 (41%); common femoral, 26 (35%); and superficial femoral, 17 (23%). Recipient vessel was dorsalis pedis, 43 (57%); posterior tibial, 18 (24%); distal anterior tibial, 9 (12%); and distal peroneal, plantar or tibial endarterectomy, 5 (7%). RESULTS: There were four (5.7%) deaths and three (4.2%) graft failures within 30 days. Early graft failure led to transmetatarsal amputation (1), below knee amputation (1), and conversion of graft to femoral (1), popliteal bypass graft with limb salvage (1). In one patient, significant tissue necrosis with infection necessitated a below knee amputation within 30 days, despite a patent graft. Long-term follow-up revealed 10 graft failures, 4 major amputations, 3 graft revisions, and 15 deaths. Cumulative primary and secondary patency was 79.0% and 81.6% at 36 months. Limb salvage was 87.5% at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results support an aggressive approach to limb salvage in patients with threatened limb loss, unreconstructable tibio-peroneal occlusive disease, and patent pedal arteries. Bypasses to the ankle and foot will maintain a functional extremity in the majority of these patients.     

Femoral-tibial bypass for calcific arterial disease

Overt calcification of the recipient artery and outflow bed has been regarded as a poor prognostic factor for femoral-distal arterial bypass patency and subsequent wound healing. In order to determine the short- and long-term limb salvage and graft patency rates achieved in these patients, the records of 35 patients undergoing 38 attempted femoral-tibial bypasses to a calcified recipient artery were reviewed. Two patients were unreconstructable at the time of surgery. Thirty-one of the 36 operations (86 percent) were performed using in situ saphenous vein bypass techniques, 3 were performed with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), 1 with a composite sequential, and 1 with a composite vein graft. Immediate limb salvage was achieved in 31 of 36 limbs (86 percent). Five early below-knee amputations (14 percent) were required, two due to graft thromboses and three due to progressive foot necrosis despite patent grafts. One patient (3 percent) died secondary to sepsis. Three-year primary graft patency and limb salvage rates did not differ significantly from bypasses to noncalcified vessels. Femoral-distal bypass in the presence of overt calcific arterial disease may be successfully accomplished and offers an excellent prognosis for long-term graft patency and limb salvage.     

Popliteal-crural bypass through the posterior approach with lesser saphenous vein for limb salvage

PURPOSE: A review of popliteal-crural bypasses via the posterior approach was done to evaluate the results of this technique. METHODS: During a period of 36 months, 21 patients with limb-threatening ischemia underwent 21 popliteal-crural bypasses via the posterior approach in the prone position with reversed lesser saphenous vein. All patients had limb-threatening ischemia, with rest pain in five patients, ulceration in nine patients, and gangrene in seven patients. Diabetes mellitus was present in 17 patients. RESULTS: The inflow site was the supragenicular popliteal artery in 12 patients and the infragenicular popliteal artery in nine patients. The outflow sites were the tibioperoneal trunk in five patients, the posterior tibial artery in six patients, the peroneal artery in eight patients, and the anterior tibial artery in two patients. Of the seven patients with gangrene, three patients underwent transmetatarsal amputation and four underwent toe amputation. The limb salvage rate for the entire group was 100% at 24 months. No early graft failures were seen, and the 12-month and 24-month primary graft patency rates were 89% and 77%, respectively, with life-table analysis. The primary assisted patency rate was 95% at 12 and 24 months. Patency was determined with duplex scan graft surveillance. CONCLUSION: The posterior approach to popliteal-distal bypass is an acceptable alternative to traditional bypass procedure with excellent early patency and limb salvage results. The approach has the advantage of better utilization of lesser saphenous vein and easier operative exposure in patients with short segment infrapopliteal occlusive disease.     

Early experience utilizing the in situ saphenous vein technique in 54 patients

We have compared our early and late experience utilizing in situ saphenous vein bypass graft for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease in 54 patients who underwent in situ femoral to popliteal and distal bypass grafts between July of 1983 and February 1985. There were 3 femoral to above-knee popliteal bypasses, 27 femoral to below-knee popliteal bypass grafts, 12 femoral to anterior tibial dorsalis pedis bypass grafts, 10 femoral to posterior tibial bypass grafts and 2 femoral to peroneal in situ bypass grafts. The operative indications were progressive disabling claudication in 8 (15%) and limb salvage in 46 (85%). Eighty-nine percent of the limb salvage patients had 0-1 vessel runoff by arteriogram. Cumulative life table patency of the 54 in situ bypass grafts was 79% at 20 months. One hundred percent of the patients who were operated on for disabling claudication had patent grafts at 20 months. Seventy-eight percent of the limb salvage patients had patent grafts. Fourteen of the limb salvage patients required amputation and of these 14, 10 had patent grafts at the time of amputation. There were 8 deaths in the series. Our results demonstrate that a definite learning curve exists with this technique, however, once established, long-term patency and improved limb salvage statistics can be obtained.     

Early results of lower extremity infrageniculate revascularization with a new polytetrafluoroethylene graft

When an autologous vein is not available for lower extremity revascularization, prosthetic grafts are often required. However, prosthetic bypass grafts have limited patency for infrageniculate reconstruction. To potentially improve patency, a new geometric modification of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft, Distaflo (Impra, Tempe, AZ), has been developed for lower extremity bypass. We reviewed our early experience with the Distaflo graft in patients who required infrageniculate bypass for lower extremity ischemia when no suitable autologous saphenous vein was available. All patients were maintained on warfarin anticoagulation postoperatively. All grafts were followed at 6- to 12-week intervals with duplex ultrasound evaluation. Patient characteristics, operative procedures, and graft surveillance information were maintained on a computerized registry. Thirty-two patients with limb-threatening ischemia underwent 35 infrageniculate reconstructions with a Distaflo graft between February 26, 1999, and August 24, 2000. Thirty-two of 35 bypasses were performed on extremities that had previously undergone a surgical procedure. Forty-eight previous revascularization procedures were done on these 25 extremities. Thirty grafts were constructed to the tibial outflow sites, whereas the remaining five grafts were placed to the below-knee popliteal artery. One patient died on the second postoperative day secondary to unrelated causes, and only one graft (3%) failed during the same hospitalization. Fifteen of 35 grafts (43%) remained patent 1 to 30 months later. Four patent grafts (6%) were ligated between 2 and 14 months for infectious indications. When considering the 20 failed grafts, 9 patients underwent major amputation, 5 patients remain with chronically ischemic limbs, and 6 patients underwent additional bypass grafts. Twenty-three patients (72%) maintained limb salvage. The Distaflo PTFE graft achieves promising early patency for complex infrageniculate revascularization and may be used as an alternative conduit in patients with critical limb ischemia who do not have an adequate vein for lower extremity revascularization.     

Femoroperoneal bypass: evaluation of potential for revascularization of the severely ischemic lower extremity.

In 79 patients in whom distal small vessel bypass with autogenous vein was used for revascularization because of gangrene, gangrenous ulceration or rest pain, 14 had femoroperoneal bypasses. Femorotibial or femoroperoneal bypasses were performed in those patients in whom no popliteal runoff was present on pre-operative arteriogram. Femoroperoneal bypass was performed in preference to primary amputation in each case. Nine of 14 (64.3%) of femoroperoneal bypasses were functional whereas 57 of 79 (72.2%) of total distal bypasses to small vessels were functional. Salvage of severely ischemic lower extremities was achieved in 5 of 14 (35.7%) patients after femoroperoneal bypass and in 46 of 65 (70.8%) patients after bypass to anterior tibial or posterior tibial arteries. Graft patency without limb salvage occurred in 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients with patent femoroperoneal bypasses and in only 2 of 48 (4.2%) of patients with femorotibial bypass. Although limb salvage rate is considerably less with femoroperoneal than femorotibial or femoropopliteal bypass, attempted limb revascularization by peroneal bypasses is preferable to primary amputation in patients with rest pain, gangrenous ulceration or gangrene.     

Late results of two hundred seventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments

A 10-year-experience of 217 femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments in 207 patients is reported. Thirty-three femoropopliteal bypasses (15%) were performed with reversed saphenous vein and 184 (85%) with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Operative indications were gangrene in 121 (56%), nonhealing ulceration in 40 (18%), ischemic rest pain in 51 (24%), and claudication in 5 (2%) cases. The 5-year primary graft patency rate of these bypasses was 59% (reversed saphenous vein, 74%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 55%; p less than 0.05), the secondary 5-year graft patency rate was 61% (reversed saphenous vein, 79%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 56%; p less than 0.05), and the 5-year limb salvage rate was 78% (reversed saphenous vein, 78%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 78%). The 30-day operative mortality rate was 10%, and the 5-year patient survival rate was 38%. Eleven patients (5%) required lower extremity amputation because of progressive gangrene or extensive infection despite a patent bypass to an isolated popliteal artery segment. We conclude that femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments (1) have acceptable 5-year graft patency and limb salvage rates; (2) should be performed with reversed saphenous vein grafts when possible; (3) may be performed with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts if necessary, with a resulting limb salvage rate equal to that of reversed saphenous vein grafts; and (4) require sequential extension to an infrapopliteal artery in up to 20% of patients. In addition, the presence of an isolated popliteal artery segment is associated with a high operative mortality rate and limited life expectancy because of coronary artery disease.     

Inframalleolar bypass in limb salvage. Late results

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to report the long-term results of distal revascularization at the ankle in patients with critical ischemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1989 to November 1999, 50 inframalleolar bypasses were performed in 49 patients (35 males and 14 females with a mean age of 75 years [range: 51 to 95 years]). Twenty-five patients (50%) were diabetics. All patients presented with critical ischemia of the lower limb. Distal anastomosis was performed at the retromalleolar posterior tibial artery in 28 cases (56%), pedal artery in 20 cases (40%) and distal fibular artery in two cases (4%). Bypasses were performed using a greater saphenous vein (n = 38), a cryopreserved arterial allograft (n = 9), or a PTFE graft (n = 2). A composite graft with greater saphenous vein and arterial allograft was performed in two cases. RESULTS: There were two early postoperative deaths. One patient presented a blow-out of the distal anastomosis that required bypass ligation and subsequent leg amputation. Early thrombosis of the graft occurred in four cases, leading to major amputation in three cases. No patients were lost to follow-up and mean follow-up was 26.7 months (range: 1 to 86 months). Graft thrombosis occurred in 15 patients and led to amputation in 6 cases. Bypass graft patency rate was 72% and 61% at 1 year and 3 years, respectively, yielding a 80% limb salvage rate at 3 years. The 3-year actuarial survival rate was 53%. CONCLUSION: Inframalleolar bypasses are a valuable tool in patients with critical ischemia. The lower limb salvage rate is satisfactory in this elderly population. Based on this experience, angiography with good run-off and, when necessary, a surgical approach to verify patency of the arteries at the ankle should always be performed before undertaking a major amputation.     

Potential predictors of outcome in patients with tissue loss who undergo infrainguinal vein bypass grafting.

PURPOSE: Aggressive attempts at limb salvage in patients with ischemic tissue loss are justified by favorable initial results in most patients. The identification of patients whose conditions will not benefit from attempted revascularization remains difficult. METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical data. The subjects were 210 consecutive patients who underwent infrainguinal vein bypass grafting for ischemic tissue loss in the setting of an academic medical center. Bypass grafting was to the popliteal artery in 56 patients, to the infrapopliteal arteries in 131 patients, and to the pedal arteries in 23 patients. The follow-up examination was complete in 209 of 210 patients. One hundred twenty-five patients underwent blinded review of duplex scan venous mapping and arteriography to determine simplified vein and run-off scores. The outcome measures were the influence of risk factors, venous conduit, and runoff on mortality, limb loss, and graft failure at the 6-month follow-up examination. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients (81%) were alive and had limb salvage. Nineteen patients (9.1%) died, with need for a simultaneous inflow procedure and end-stage renal disease being most commonly associated with mortality. Thirty-three patients (15.8%) had undergone amputation: 18 after graft failure, and 15 for progressive tissue loss despite a patent graft. Amputation was significantly more common in patients with diabetes (P =.05) and with poor runoff scores (poor runoff, 44.4% vs good runoff, 7.4%; P <.01). Amputation despite a patent graft also correlated with runoff (poor runoff, 41.7% vs good runoff, 4.3%; P <.01). Twenty-five patients had graft failure without amputation, so that only 145 patients (69.4%) were alive, had limb salvage, and had a patent graft. Run-off score was the strongest predictor of outcome, with 70% of patients with poor run-off scores having death, amputation, or graft failure. CONCLUSION: Aggressive use of infrainguinal vein bypass grafting in patients with ischemic tissue loss results in a high rate of initial limb salvage but significant morbidity and mortality. Arteriographically determined runoff scores appear to potentially identify patients at high risk for a poor initial outcome and may provide a method of selecting patients for primary amputation.     

Sequential femoral-tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage.

Bypass grafting to distal lower extremity vessels continues to be associated with a high rate of graft occlusion. By utilizing a sequential side-to-side anastomosis between saphenous vein and popliteal artery in femoral-tibial bypass grafts, runoff can be increased and graft patency thereby improved. Sequential femoral-tibial grafts were employed in seven patients with gangrene, trophic changes, or restpain, all of whom had single-vessel runoff by arteriography. All seven sequential grafts established to a distal vessel in addition to the popliteal artery have remained open for periods of five to 27 months as determined by palpable graft or foot pulses. Two patients undersent below-knee amputation within six months of operation but had patent grafts at the time of amputation. In three patients ischemic ulcers resolved and in two patients toe amputations healed successfully. Sequential bypass grafting is a technique aimed at improving the patency rate of femoral-tibial bypass grafts by augmenting runoff.