Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle breast biopsy

PURPOSE: To review outcomes of lesions diagnosed at core-needle breast biopsy as atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from 1,400 consecutive core-needle breast biopsies were reviewed. Twenty-five (1.8%) biopsy samples with the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia (15 with ALH and 10 with LCIS) adjacent to or in a targeted benign lesion were found. Lesions were excised (n = 15) or followed up (n = 10) at least 22 months. RESULTS: Of the 15 lesions with ALH, 13 (87%) were adjacent to (n = 12) or associated with (n = 1) microcalcifications, and two (13%) were in masses. Six lesions with residual calcifications were excised. One lesion was diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and five were benign (residual ALH was seen in four). One excised mass showed residual ALH. Six lesions were gone at follow-up, one cluster of microcalcifications was decreased in size, and one fibroadenoma with ALH was stable. Of the 10 lesions with LCIS, seven (70%) were adjacent to (n = 6) or associated with (n = 1) microcalcifications, and three (30%) were in or adjacent to masses. Five lesions with LCIS and residual microcalcifications were excised. Three yielded atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH); one, residual LCIS; and one, ALH. Three masses with LCIS were excised. One showed residual LCIS; one, a papilloma with adjacent LCIS; and one, a fibroadenoma with LCIS in it. One cluster of microcalcifications was gone at follow-up, and one was stable. CONCLUSION: After a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia at core biopsy, residual microcalcifications are viewed in the context of a patient at higher risk of cancer. Of 11 lesions with residual microcalcifications, three (27%) were ADH and one (9%) was DCIS.     

Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and positive predictive value of ductal enhancement among MR imaging-detected breast lesions that had biopsy and to assess the histologic findings associated with ductal enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 427 nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MR imaging-guided needle localization and surgical biopsy. Lesions were reviewed by one radiologist who was unaware of the histologic outcomes and were classified according to a standardized lexicon. MR imaging and histologic findings of ductal enhancing lesions were reviewed. RESULTS: Ductal enhancement accounted for 88 (21%) of 427 lesions and 88 (59%) of 150 nonmass lesions. Histologic finding in these 88 lesions were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 18 (20%); infiltrating carcinoma in five (6%), including three with DCIS; lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) in nine (10%); atypical ductal hyperplasia in eight (9%); and benign in 48 (55%). Among the 48 benign lesions, the dominant histologic findings were fibrocystic change (n = 16); ductal hyperplasia (n = 8); fibrosis (n = 8); postbiopsy change (n = 5); benign breast tissue (n = 3); sclerosing adenosis (n = 2); and single cases of fibroadenoma, fibroadenomatoid change, lymph node, mastitis, papilloma, and radial scar. Factors associated with a trend toward a higher frequency of carcinoma included clumped enhancement (p = 0.05) and synchronous ipsilateral cancer (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Ductal enhancement accounted for 21% of MR imaging-detected lesions that had biopsy and had a positive predictive value of 26%. Differential diagnosis of ductal enhancement includes carcinoma (usually DCIS); atypical ductal hyperplasia; LCIS; and benign findings such as fibrocystic change, ductal hyperplasia, and fibrosis.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41-84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson chi(2) test). RESULTS: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P =.88). CONCLUSION: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.     

Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy

Percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy is a less invasive and less expensive alternative to surgical biopsy for the evaluation of breast lesions. Percutaneous core biopsy is most often used for evaluation of BI-RADS category 4 lesions, but may also be helpful in the evaluation of some BI-RADS category 5 lesions. Stereotactic guidance is particularly useful for calcifications; for masses that can be seen with ultrasound, ultrasound guidance may be preferable because of the absence of radiation and lower cost. The automated core biopsy needle is excellent for mass lesions, but directional vacuum-assisted biopsy is superior for calcifications. Directional vacuum-assisted biopsy may also be preferable for small lesions that may require placement of a localizing clip and lesions that are superficial or in thin breasts. The more expensive ABBI device has substantial limitations, and its role in percutaneous breast biopsy has not been demonstrated. Complete removal of the mammographic target can occur at percutaneous biopsy, and is a more frequent event when the larger tissue acquisition devices are used. Complete removal of the mammographic target does not ensure complete excision of the histologic process. Further investigation is necessary to determine in which lesions, if any, complete removal of the target is advantageous. Epithelial displacement can occur during all breast needling procedures, but may be less frequent at directional vacuum-assisted biopsy than at fine-needle aspiration or automated core biopsy. There is no evidence that displaced cells are of biologic significance, but displaced DCIS can mimic infiltrating carcinoma. The pathologist should be aware of the findings of epithelial displacement, to avoid misdiagnosing DCIS as infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Some lesions warrant repeat biopsy or surgical excision after percutaneous core biopsy. Repeat biopsy is warranted if histologic findings and imaging findings are discordant. Surgical excision is warranted for lesions yielding a percutaneous diagnosis of ADH or possible phyllodes tumor. Controversy exists regarding the need for surgical excision after percutaneous diagnosis of radial scar, papillary lesion, ALH, or LCIS. Follow-up is necessary if percutaneous biopsy yields benign findings concordant with imaging characteristics. Follow-up protocols vary, but all require substantial commitment of time and resources. We have an embarassment of riches for performing percutaneous core biopsy of the breast. It can be estimated that approximately 1 million breast biopsies will be performed this year to diagnose approximately 200,000 breast cancers. Percutaneous core biopsy may spare many of these women the need for a more deforming, invasive, and expensive surgical biopsy. Further work is necessary to optimize criteria for patient selection, develop and define the role of new technologies for tissue acquisition, refine protocols for management after percutaneous breast biopsy, and assess long-term outcome, so that more women can benefit from this minimally invasive approach to breast diagnosis.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy-what is the clinical significance?

AIM: To retrospectively review the surgical histological findings in all cases where lobular carcinoma in situ(LCIS) was identified on percutaneous core biopsy (CB) performed as part of the Cambridge and Huntingdon breast screening programme.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the core biopsies performed in our department for screen detected abnormalities over a 5-year period between 1 April 1994 and 31 March 1999. All patients where LCIS was identified on CB were reviewed. As the significance of LCIS on CB was unclear all went on to surgical excision. We reviewed the clinical and imaging findings, biopsy technique and subsequent surgical histology of each patient.RESULTS: During the study period 60 769 women were invited for screening, of whom 47 975 attended (attendance rate = 79%). Of these, 2330 (4.9%) were recalled for assessment and 749 (1.6%) underwent CB. A malignant diagnosis was obtained in 311 (42%), 211 invasive and 100 in situ lesions. LCIS was identified on CB in 13 (2%). LCIS was the only lesion identified in seven cases. All seven cases subsequently underwent surgical excision. Surgical histology revealed a single case of LCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma. There were two cases of LCIS and DCIS one with a probable focus of invasive ductal carcinoma. In one case LCIS was identified in association with a radial scar. In three of the seven cases LCIS was the only abnormality on both CB and surgical biopsy.CONCLUSION: Our series shows that isolated LCIS on CB following mammographic screening is an infrequent finding, and it may be associated with either an invasive cancer or DCIS. It is therefore advisable that when LCIS is identified on CB, surgical excision of the mammographic abnormality should be performed. Decisions on management should be undertaken in a multidisciplinary setting taking into account clinical and imaging findings.     

MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience

PURPOSE: To perform magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-compatible vacuum-assisted 9-gauge core-needle biopsy of suspicious enhancing breast lesions identified at MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board granted exempt status for this HIPAA-compliant study and waived the requirement for informed consent. The MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy findings of 85 lesions in 75 patients aged 31-89 years were retrospectively reviewed. The biopsies were performed as part of the patients' clinical care with a Food and Drug Administration-approved biopsy system and not within a research protocol. All included patients had received a diagnosis of malignant, benign, or high-risk (for cancer) breast tissue at core-needle biopsy and had undergone subsequent surgery or follow-up imaging. MR imaging-guided biopsy results were compared with final histopathologic or follow-up imaging findings. RESULTS: At MR imaging-guided core-needle biopsy, malignancy was identified in 52 (61%) lesions: 35 invasive cancers and 17 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. Four (24%) of the 17 DCIS lesions were upgraded to invasive cancer at excisional biopsy or mastectomy. A high-risk lesion (ie, atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or radial scar) was identified in 18 (21%) cases. Two (25%) of eight atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions were upgraded to DCIS at excision. No malignancy was found in the atypical lobular hyperplasia (n = 2), lobular carcinoma in situ (n = 5), or radial scar (n = 3) lesions. Fifteen (18%) lesions were found to be benign lesions of unknown type at excision or mastectomy. For 13 of these 15 lesions, the benign results were concordant with the imaging findings. Both (two of 86, 2%) discordant cases represented false-negative lesions. The remaining 13 benign lesions were validated at excisional biopsy (n = 9) or follow-up imaging (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Initial experience revealed MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy to be a reasonable alternative to MR imaging-guided wire localization of suspicious lesions identified at MR imaging only, on the basis of published information regarding the latter.     

Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

OBJECTIVE: Displaced epithelial fragments at percutaneous biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may mimic stromal invasion. This study was undertaken to determine the frequency of epithelial displacement in DCIS lesions of patients who underwent stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 consecutive DCIS lesions in patients who underwent stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy followed by surgery. Surgical specimens were examined for histologic evidence of epithelial displacement, consisting of fragments of epithelium in artifactual spaces in breast parenchyma or in lymphovascular channels, accompanied by hemorrhage, fat necrosis, inflammation, hemosiderin-laden macrophages, or granulation tissue. RESULTS: The median number of specimens obtained per lesion was 14 (range, seven to 45). The median interval from stereotactic biopsy to surgery was 27 days (range, 10-59 days). Surgery revealed DCIS in 19 (68%) of 28 lesions, DCIS and infiltrating carcinoma in four lesions (14%), and no residual carcinoma in five lesions (18%). Reactive changes at the biopsy site were identified in all cases. Displacement of benign epithelium into granulation tissue at the stereotactic biopsy site was identified in two cases (7%). We found no evidence of displacement of malignant epithelium. CONCLUSION: Epithelial displacement is uncommon after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast. We observed displacement of benign epithelium in two (7%) of 28 DCIS lesions and no displacement of malignant epithelium.     

Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new method for performing MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a study of lesions that had subsequent surgical excision. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty women scheduled for MRI-guided needle localization and surgical biopsy were prospectively entered in the study. MRI-guided biopsy was performed with a vacuum-assisted probe, followed by placement of a localizing clip, and then needle localization for surgical excision. Vacuum-assisted biopsy and surgical histology were correlated. RESULTS: Vacuum-assisted biopsy was successfully performed in 19 (95%) of the 20 women. The median size of 27 MRI-detected lesions that had biopsy was 1.0 cm (range, 0.4-6.4 cm). Cancer was present in eight (30%) of 27 lesions and in six (32%) of 19 women; among these eight cancers, five were infiltrating and three were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Among these 27 lesions, histology was benign at vacuum-assisted biopsy and at surgery in 19 (70%), cancer at vacuum-assisted biopsy in six (22%), atypical ductal hyperplasia at vacuum-assisted biopsy and DCIS at surgery in one (4%), and benign at vacuum-assisted biopsy with surgery showing microscopic DCIS that was occult at MRI in one (4%). The median time to perform vacuum-assisted biopsy of a single lesion was 35 min (mean, 35 min; range, 24-48 min). Placement of a localizing clip, attempted in 26 lesions, was successful in 25 (96%) of 26, and the clip was retrieved on specimen radiography in 22 (96%) of 23. One complication occurred: a hematoma that resolved with compression. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is a fast, safe, and accurate alternative to surgical biopsy for breast lesions detected on MRI.     

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. RESULTS: Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. CONCLUSION: Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.     

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions

PURPOSE: We evaluated the reliability of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VAB) from our personal experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2005, 268 patients underwent VAB with an 11-gauge probe at our institution. Inclusion criteria were nonpalpable lesions, undetectable by ultrasound and suspected at mammography (microcalcifications, circumscribed mass, architectural distortion), for which cytology and/or core biopsy could not provide a definite diagnosis. Lesion mammographic patterns were microcalcifications in 186 cases (77.5%), mostly localised clusters (130/186: 70%); circumscribed mass with or without microcalcifications in 36 cases (15%) and architectural distortion with or without microcalcifications in 18 cases (7.5%). On the basis of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, 16 cases (7%) were graded as highly suspicious for malignancy (BI-RADS 5), 81 (34%) as suspicious for malignancy (BI-RADS 4b), 97 (40%) as indeterminate (BI-RADS 4a) and 46 (19%) as probably benign (BI-RADS 3). Lesion size was 20 mm in only 38 cases (16%), 30 of which appeared as microcalcifications. RESULTS: In 28/268 lesions (10.5%) the biopsy could not be performed (nonidentification of the lesion; inaccessibility due to location or breast size). In 12/240 (5%) biopsies, the sample was not representative. Pathology revealed 100/240 (42%) malignant or borderline lesions and 140/240 (58%) benign lesions. Among the malignant lesions, 16/100 (16%) were invasive carcinoma [infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) or infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC)], 13/100 (13%) were microinvasive (T1mic), 35/100 (35%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 9/100 (9%) were lobular carcinoma in situ (CLIS). Among the borderline lesions, 27/100 (27%) were atypical epithelial hyperplasia [atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)]. In 9/100 surgically treated lesions (9%), there was discordance between the microhistological findings of VAB and the pathological results of the surgical procedure: 8/9 were underestimated by VAB (four ADH vs. DCIS, three DCIS vs. IDC, one ADH vs. IDC), and 1/9 was overestimated (T1mic vs. DCIS). Complications following VAB occurred in 9/240 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, VAB showed fair reliability in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions despite a portion of failed (10.5%), nonsignificant (5%) procedures and underestimated lesions (9%).     

Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to show that one can safely remove all sonographic evidence of masses in the breast less than or equal to 1.5 cm in greatest dimension using the 11-gauge handheld Mammotome, thereby reducing the possibility of a false-negative diagnosis and other shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over a 12-week period (May 3--July 31, 2000), 124 sonographically guided breast biopsies were performed in 113 patients, using a new handheld directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. All lesions that were less than or equal to 1.5 cm were biopsied using a handheld Mammotome; an attempt was made to continue the biopsy until no sonographic evidence of the lesion remained. RESULTS: Of these 124 lesions, 14 had infiltrating ductal carcinomas, four had infiltrating ductal carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ, one had infiltrating lobular carcinoma, one had ductal carcinoma in situ, three had atypical ductal hyperplasias, one had atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one had phyllodes tumor. Only one infiltrating ductal carcinoma was entirely removed histologically at Mammotome biopsy. There were no underestimates of disease. No cases of epithelial displacement were observed in any of the surgical excisions of malignancies. The remaining 99 lesions were benign. CONCLUSION: The handheld Mammotome diminishes the shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. It reduces the possibility of false-negatives and underestimation of disease. It eliminates the need for multiple insertions and reduces the likelihood of epithelial displacement. As a result, we now use this device for all sonographically guided biopsies of breast masses smaller than 1.5 cm and recommend that others consider it for such use.     

Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation

PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative whole-breast ultrasonography (US) in the management of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ipsilateral breast in 40 patients with known breast cancer or in whom there was high suspicion of breast cancer was evaluated with whole-breast US. Biopsy was performed on all discrete solid lesions. RESULTS: US depicted 45 (94%) of 48 invasive tumor foci and seven (44%) of 16 foci of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Mammography depicted 39 (81%) of 48 invasive tumor foci and 14 (88%) of 16 foci of DCIS. The nine (14%) of 64 malignant foci seen only at US included three infiltrating ductal carcinomas, two mixed infiltrating and intraductal carcinomas, two infiltrating lobular carcinomas, and two foci of DCIS. Two (18%) of 11 foci of infiltrating lobular carcinoma were missed at both US and mammography. Of 20 patients mammographically suspected of having unifocal disease, three (15%) required wider excision on the basis of US findings. Two additional foci were depicted only at US in one of 16 patients mammographically suspected of having multicentric or multifocal disease. Of four patients with mammographically occult disease, US correctly depicted the diffuse (n = 2) or unifocal (n = 2) extent of the cancer. CONCLUSION: Whole-breast US complements mammography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with breast cancer, particularly when breast conservation is contemplated.     

Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions with a handheld vacuum biopsy device

Purpose: To evaluate a handheld vacuum-assisted device system for magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided breast lesion biopsy.

Material and Methods: In 32 patients, a total of 42 suspicious breast lesions (mean diameter 7.5 mm for mass lesions, 11.6 mm for non-masslike diffuse lesions) seen with MRI (no suspicious changes in breast ultrasound or mammography) were biopsied (27 lateral, 15 medial) using a 10G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device under MR guidance. Histology of biopsy specimens was compared with final histology after surgery or follow-up in benign lesions.

Results: In all biopsies, technical success was achieved. Histology revealed 11 lesions with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer, three with intermediate lesions (LCIS) and 28 with benign breast lesions (adenosis, infected hematoma). In one patient with discordant results of MRI and histology, surgical excision revealed medullary cancer. In the follow-up (mean 18 months) of the histological benign lesions, no breast cancer development was observed. Besides minor complications (hematoma, n = 6), with no further therapeutic interventions, no complications occurred.

Conclusion: MRI-guided breast lesion biopsy using a handheld vacuum-assisted device is a safe and effective method for the work-up of suspicious lesions seen with breast MRI without changes in mammography or ultrasound. In the case of discordant histology of vacuum biopsy and breast MRI appearance, surgical excision is recommended.     

Detection and localization of occult lesions using breast magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience in a community hospital

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of diagnostic breast MR imaging followed by MR guided needle localization for mammographically and sonographically occult breast lesions in a community-based hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of the initial 50 consecutive patients who underwent MR guided needle localizations at our institution from November 2001 to January 2003 were reviewed. Sixty-two lesions were localized by MR and were mammographically and sonographically occult. Pathology following excision was reviewed and correlated with the MR findings. RESULTS: Cancer was present in 15 % (9/62) of lesions or 18 % (9/50) of the women localized. Five of the lesions (56%) were invasive carcinoma and four (44%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). High-risk lesions, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), were found in 6.5 % (4/62) of the lesions, while 3 % (2/62) of the lesions contained lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Cancer plus high risk lesions were found in 15/62 (24%) lesions or 14/50 (28%) of women who underwent biopsy. CONCLUSION: The data in this study supports findings from other studies conducted by large research institutions. In this regard, it is important that community-based hospitals, such as the one operating this breast MR program, can achieve the same positive predictive values as those found in data emanating from academic institutions.     

Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of stereotactically and sonographically guided core biopsy (CB) for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two institutions enrolled 2,403 women who underwent imaging-guided fine needle aspiration followed by imaging-guided large-CB of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. All mammograms were reviewed for study eligibility by one of two breast imaging radiologists. The protocol for image-guided biopsy, using either ultrasound (USCB) or stereotactic (SCB) guidance, was standardized at all institutions and all biopsy specimens were over-read by one of three expert pathologists. Patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia, or lobular neoplasia on CB underwent surgical excision. Those with negative CB but suspicious ("discordant") pre-biopsy mammography also underwent surgical excision. Patients having a negative CB that was concordant with the pre-biopsy mammography suspicion were assigned to follow-up mammography at 6, 12, and 24 months following CB. RESULTS: A gold standard diagnosis based on definitive histopathologic diagnosis, mammography follow-up, or an imputed gold standard diagnosis was established for 1,681 patients. Of 310 cases with a gold standard diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma, 261 (84.2%) were invasive carcinoma, 31 (10%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), four (1.3%) were ADH, one (0.3%) was a non-breast cancer, and 13 (4.2%) were benign on CB. For 138 cases with a gold standard diagnosis of DCIS, 113 (81.9%) were DCIS, 20 (14.5%) were ADH, and five (3.6%) were benign on CB. For 57 cases (13 masses, 44 calcifications) with an initial CB diagnosis of ADH, atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia, 20 (35.1%) had a gold standard diagnosis of DCIS (4 masses, 16 calcifications) and four (7.0%) had a gold standard diagnosis of invasive cancer (4 calcifications). Of 144 cases (22 masses, 122 calcifications) with an initial CB diagnosis of DCIS, 31 (21.5%) had a gold standard diagnosis of invasive cancer (10 masses, 21 calcifications). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CB by either imaging guidance method in this trial were .91, 1.00, and .98, respectively. The sensitivity, predictive value negative, and accuracy of CB for diagnosing masses (.96, .99, and .99, respectively) were significantly greater (P < .001) than for calcifications (.84, .94, and .96, respectively). The sensitivity (.89) of SCB for diagnosing all lesions was significantly lower (P = 0.029) than that of USCB (.97) because of the preponderance of calcifications biopsied by SCB versus USCB. There was no difference between USCB and SCB in sensitivity, predictive value negative, or accuracy for the diagnosis of masses (97.3, 98.9, and 99.2, respectively for USCB; 95.6, 98.5, and 98.9 respectively for SCB). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, imaged-guided core breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic alternative to surgical biopsy in women with mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.     

早期乳腺癌的CR表现及病理基础

目的评价早期乳腺癌的CR表现及其病理基础。方法回顾性分析经病理证实的43例早期乳腺癌的CR片,包括导管原位癌及导管原位癌伴微浸润30例、浸润性导管癌12例和浸润性小叶癌1例,观察早期乳腺癌的CR表现,并与病理对照。结果(1)43例早期乳腺癌中,CR表现钙化21例(49%),结节15例(35%),非对称性局限性密度增高影伴结构紊乱7例(16%)。(2)乳腺数字化图像可以显示早期乳腺癌病变的细微结构。结论乳腺CR成像对早期乳腺癌的诊断具有重要意义。     

Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features

The mammographic features of carcinoma originating within a fibroadenoma in 24 patients were studied by means of retrospective review of pathologic slides. Histologic examination showed that the lesions were lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (seven patients), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (13 patients), synchronous LCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma (one patient), and synchronous LCIS and DCIS (three patients). In all patients the mammographic manifestation was a mass 1.0 cm or greater in diameter; 14 masses were 1-2 cm in diameter, and the remainder were more than 2 cm in diameter. Features that were considered suspect included large size, indistinct margins, and clustered microcalcifications. In three patients, microcalcifications within the mass raised suspicion of malignancy. At histologic examination these microcalcifications were associated with the intraductal carcinoma harbored in the fibroadenoma in only one of these patients. Fibroadenomas that harbor carcinoma may be indistinguishable from common benign fibroadenomas, but their occurrence is rare. In this study, a single patient had invasive lobular carcinoma; all the other lesions were in situ lesions.     

Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV)

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of the new 8G stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (ST-driver, Mammotome; Ethicon Endosurgery) in the histologic evaluation of BI-RADS IV microcalcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with 61 mammographic BI-RADS IV microcalcifications underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). The new 8G system was mounted on the ST driver, which was formerly used only with the hand-held version under sonographic guidance. The evaluation criteria for each biopsy were minimally invasive and operative histologies, the time needed for biopsy, the amount of bleeding, number of rotations and specimen, the degree of resection, and the complications. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 61 biopsies were technically successful because > or = 50% were resected (29 x 100%, 8 x 90%, 5 x 80%, 6 x 70%, 3 x 50%, 3 x 0%). In 7 cases with representative biopsies of segmental suspicious microcalcifications, the degree of resection could not be exactly measured. All but 2 biopsies were performed without clinically relevant complications and after gaining enough specimens (? 12.6 specimen, 1.85 rotations). Those 2 patients showed evidence of severe bleeding into the breast tissue and operative revision had to be performed (3.5%). The size of intramammary hematoma was measurable in 27 biopsies and showed a range from 0.5 to 5 cm (? 2.7 cm). The average external bleeding was still low with 16 mL (5-80 mL). In 3 of 61 lesions, it was not possible to gain representative tissue as a result of displacement of the lesion after introducing or shooting the needle. The average time needed for all biopsies was 28.2 minutes for all but 5 very complicated biopsies, which took 16.1 minutes. The histologic findings with further operative workup were: 10 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), 4 atypical ductal hyperplasias, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), and 6 invasive ductal carcinomas. In 7 of 12 of the initial DCIS histologies, the operative histology was also DCIS, whereas in 4 of 12, no residual malignant tumor was found. In 1 of 12 patients with an initial DCIS histology, operative histology revealed invasive ductal cancer (8.3%). The cases with lobular lesions (ALH, LCIS) did not show any evidence for residual tissue in the operative workup. Most frequent benign histologies were mastopathy (13), ductal hyperplasia (9), fibroadenoma (8), and sclerosing adenosis (5). The control examinations (maximum 1 year) did not show any signs for a false-negative biopsy. CONCLUSION: The 11-G SVAB has proven to be a perfect adjunct to the existing breast biopsy methods. The new 8G SVAB speeds up the method when used for the same size of lesions and enables the user to representatively biopsy lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. The method is still minimally invasive; however, the amount of hematomas as well as clinically relevant complications is increased.     

MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of cancer and the positive predictive value of biopsy in the first screening round of breast MRI in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of the records of 367 consecutive women at high risk of developing breast cancer who had normal findings on mammography and their first breast MRI screening examination during a 2-year period. The frequency of recommending biopsy at the first screening MRI study and the biopsy results were reviewed. RESULTS: Biopsy was recommended in 64 women (17%). Biopsy revealed cancer that was occult on mammography and physical examination in 14 (24%) of 59 women who had biopsy and in 14 (4%) of 367 women who underwent breast MRI screening. Histologic findings in 14 women with cancer were ductal carcinoma in situ in eight (57%) and infiltrating carcinoma in six (43%). The median size of infiltrating carcinoma was 0.4 cm (range, 0.1-1.2 cm). Two patients had nodes that were positive for cancer. Biopsy revealed high-risk lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or radial scar) in 13 (4%) of 367 women and other benign findings in 32 (9%) of 367 women who had MRI screening. CONCLUSION: Among women at high risk of developing breast cancer, breast MRI led to a recommendation of biopsy in 17%. Cancer was found in 24% of women who underwent biopsy and in 4% of women who had breast MRI screening. More than half the MRI-detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ.