Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb

Most sensory stimuli are actively sampled, yet the role of sampling behavior in shaping sensory codes is poorly understood. Mammals sample odors by sniffing, a complex behavior that controls odorant access to receptor neurons. Whether sniffing shapes the neural code for odors remains unclear. We addressed this question by imaging receptor input to the olfactory bulb of awake rats performing odor discriminations that elicited different sniffing behaviors. High-frequency sniffing of an odorant attenuated inputs encoding that odorant, whereas lower sniff frequencies caused little attenuation. Odorants encountered later in a sniff bout were encoded as the combination of that odorant and the background odorant during low-frequency sniffing, but were encoded as the difference between the two odorants during high-frequency sniffing. Thus, sniffing controls an adaptive filter for detecting changes in the odor landscape. These data suggest an unexpected functional role for sniffing and show that sensory codes can be transformed by sampling behavior alone.     

Rapid olfactory processing implicates subcortical control of an olfactomotor system

Sniffs are modulated in response to odor content. Higher concentrations of odor induce lesser-volume sniffs. This phenomenon implicates a neural feedback mechanism that measures sensory input (odor concentration) and modulates motor output (sniffing) accordingly. Here we used air-dilution olfactometry to probe the time course of this olfactomotor mechanism. A stainless-steel computer-controlled olfactometer, equipped with mass flow controllers, temperature and humidity control, and on-line photo-ionization detection, was coupled to a highly sensitive pneumatotachograph that measured nasal flow. The olfactometer was used to generate four ascending concentrations of the odorants propionic acid and phenethyl alcohol. Sniff volume was inversely related to odor concentration (P > 0.0001). Sniffs were uniform and concentration independent for the initial 150 ms but acquired a concentration-dependent flowrate as early as 160 ms following sniff onset for propionic acid (P > 0.05) and 260 ms for phenethyl alcohol (P > 0.05). Considering that odorant transduction takes around 150 ms and odorant-induced cortical evoked potentials have latencies of around 300 ms, the rapid motor adjustments measured here suggest that olfactomotor sniff feedback control is subcortical and may rely on neural mechanisms similar to those that modulate eye movements to accommodate vision and ear movements to accommodate audition.     

Identification of single dissimilar odors is achieved by humans with a single sniff

The duration that a single odor needs to be sniffed for identification was determined for 18 humans. A hot wire anemometer and an oscilloscope were used to monitor the duration, volume and inhalation rate of sniffs. In Experiment 1 subjects used 1, 3 or 5 natural sniffs, or an unlimited number of natural sniffs to sample seven dissimilar single odors of moderate perceived intensity, and demonstrated that each odor could be identified with a single sniff. In Experiment 2 subjects demonstrated that each of the odors could be identified with the shortest sniff (0.42 sec) they could physically achieve. In Experiment 3 tests with two of the odorants at several concentrations showed that sniff duration influences identification over a narrow range of concentrations that is just above the recognition threshold. These results together with earlier data that described the optimum conditions for the detection of an odor and the perception of odor intensity, provide information that is necessary for the development of a standard olfactometer and standard methods for human olfactory measurements.     

Discrimination among odorants by single neurons of the rat olfactory bulb

1. Intracellular and extracellular recordings were made from rat olfactory bulb mitral and tufted cells during odor stimulation and during electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve. Neurons were identified by horseradish peroxidase injections and/or antidromic activation. The presentation of multiple concentrations of at least one odorant in a cyclic artificial sniff paradigm, as reported previously (10), allowed the study of odor responses. This approach was extended to multiple odorants to compare their concentration-response profiles. This procedure avoids the problems of interpretation resulting from nonequivalence of the effective concentrations of different odorants used as stimuli that have characterized previous studies of odor quality effects. Comparisons of intracellular events and responses to electrical stimulation with the odor-induced spike train activity allow us to begin to delineate the local circuitry involved in generating odor-induced responses. 2. The concentration-response profiles of the 72 cells in the present study are comparable to those previously reported for output neurons of the olfactory bulb, showing ordered changes in the temporal patterning of spike activity with step changes in odor concentration. However, eight of the neurons exhibited inhibitory responses to lower concentrations, but excitation, at similar latency, to higher concentrations of the same odorant. These data emphasize that to study pattern changes induced by changing odor quality the influence of stimulus intensity must also be carefully examined. The data also provide evidence that the temporal pattern evoked by an odorant is probably not in itself the code for odor quality recognition. 3. Complete concentration-response profiles, including subthreshold concentrations, to more than one odorant show that, although responses to the different odorant can evolve systematically with concentration, the responses to different odorants can evolve through very different patterns. For example, in some cells, the response patterns to different odors were complementary in form. These results demonstrate that the patterned responses of olfactory bulb neurons can reflect changes in odor quality as well as intensity. 4. Intracellular recording was employed to compare the temporal patterning of spikes during odor stimulation with membrane potential changes. In some cases, the spike pattern was closely correlated with apparent postsynaptic potentials. However, there were several clear exceptions. In five cells, a prominent hyperpolarization, seen in the first sniff of a series of 10 consecutive sniffs, was associated with pauses in spike activity. In the following     

Intracellular responses of identified rat olfactory bulb interneurons to electrical and odor stimulation

1. Intracellular recordings were made from 28 granule cells and 6 periglomerular cells of the rat olfactory bulb during odor stimulation and electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve layer (ONL) and lateral olfactory tract (LOT). Neurons were identified by injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or biocytin and/or intracellular response characteristics. Odorants were presented in a cyclic sniff paradigm, as reported previously. 2. All interneurons could be activated from a wide number of stimulation sites on the ONL, with distances exceeding their known dendritic spreads and the dispersion of nerve fibers within the ONL, indicating that multisynaptic pathways must also exist at the glomerular region. All types of interneurons also responded to odorant stimulation, showing a variety of responses. 3. Granule cells responded to electrical stimulation of the LOT and ONL as reported previously. However, intracellular potential, excitability, and conductance analysis suggested that the mitral cell-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) is followed by a long inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP). An early negative potential, before the EPSP, was also observed in every granule cell and correlated with component I of the extracellular LOT-induced field potential. We have interpreted this negativity as a "field effect," that may be diagnostic of granule cells. 4. Most granule cells exhibited excitatory responses to odorant stimulation. Odors could produce spiking responses that were either nonhabituating (response to every sniff) or rapidly habituating (response to first sniff only). Other granule cells, while spiking to electrical stimulation, showed depolarizations that did not evoke spikes to odor stimulation. These depolarizations were transient with each sniff or sustained across a series of sniffs. These physiological differences to odor stimulation correlated with granule cell position beneath the mitral cell layer for 12 cells, suggesting that morphological subtypes of granule cells may show physiological differences. Some features of the granule cell odor responses seem to correlate with some of the features we have observed in mitral/tufted cell intracellular recordings. Only one cell showed inhibition to odors. 5. Periglomerular (PG) cells showed a response to ONL stimulation that was unlike that found in other olfactory bulb neurons. There was a long-duration hyperpolarization after a spike and large depolarization or burst of spikes (20-30 ms in duration). Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, suggesting that PG cells may simply follow input from the olfactory nerve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Control of the rat's sniffing behavior by response-independent and dependent schedules of reinforcing brain stimulation

The rat's sniffing response occurs in continuous bursts, at approximately 5–11 Hz. In the present experiments, the analog signal from a thermocouple probe in the nasal cavity was digitized to provide a discrete logic pulse, defining a sniff, and permitting on-line presentations of reinforcing brain stimulation contingent on momentary sniffing patterns. Schedules of reinforcer presentation included response-independent fixed interval (temporal conditioning), continuous reinforcement (CRF), and differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL 10 sec). Under temporal conditioning, bursts of sniffing were observed immediately after stimulation, and an acceleration in sniffing developed preceding stimulation. Under CRF, operant rate-intensity functions were found to be similar to traditional bar-press data. Under DRL, sniffs were effectively paced by the criterion interval, and interresponse time analyses revealed evidence of temporal discrimination. The behavioral patterns were interpreted in terms of the interplay of operant and respondent functions.     

Sniffing-related motor cortical potential: Topography and possible generators

This study estimated the whole-scalp topography and possible generators of the cortical potential associated with volitional self-paced inspirations (sniffs). In 17 healthy subjects we recorded a 32-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) during sniffing, for comparison during finger flexions. We averaged the EEG with respect to movement onset, and performed current source density and principal component analysis on the grand averaged data. We identified an early negative sniffing-related cortical potential starting ∼1.5 s before movement at the vertex, which, in its time-course and dipole orientation, closely resembled Bereitshaftspotential preceding finger flexions. Around the movement onset, its topography became unique with three negative current sources: one at the vertex, and two bilaterally over the fronto-temporal derivations. We conclude that sequential cortical activation in preparation for sniffing is similar to other volitional movements. The current sources at sniff onset at the vertex likely reflect somatotopic motor representation of the diaphragm, neck and intercostal muscles, whereas current sources over fronto-temporal derivations likely reflect the somatotopic representation of the orofacial muscles.     

Optimum perception of odor intensity by humans

The sniff duration that provides optimum perception of odor intensity was determined for 17 humans. Subjects were trained to match the duration of their sniff to the duration of a buzzer that sounded for 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 sec. Sniff characteristics were monitored with a hot wire anemometer and an oscilloscope. Intensity estimates were obtained at the four durations for three concentrations of phenyl ethanol, butanol and propionic acid. Optimum perception of intensity occurred between 0.39 and 0.64 sec for phenyl ethanol and propionic acid and a value of no more than 1.63 sec is proposed for butanol. The longer duration for butanol is attributed to the delayed response of nerves in the throat which appear to respond to this odorant but not to the others. The complexity of the intensity sensation and implications of the results for neurophysiological studies of intensity coding are discussed and the properties of an olfactometer for odor intensity measurements are outlined.     

Rapid and precise control of sniffing during olfactory discrimination in rats

Olfactory perception relies on an active sampling process, sniffing, to rapidly deliver odorants from the environment to the olfactory receptors. The respiration cycle strongly patterns the flow of information into the olfactory systems, but the behavioral significance of particular sniffing patterns is not well understood. Here, we monitored the frequency and timing of nasal respiration in rats performing an odor-mixture-discrimination task that allowed us to test subjects near psychophysical limits and to quantify the precise timing of their behavior. We found that respiration frequencies varied widely from 2 to 12 Hz, but odor discrimination was dependent on 6- to 9-Hz sniffing: rats almost always entered and maintained this frequency band during odor sampling and their accuracy on difficult discrimination dropped when they did not. Moreover, the switch from baseline respiration to sniffing occurred not in response to odor delivery but in anticipation of odor sampling and was executed rapidly, almost always within a single cycle. Interestingly, rats also switched from respiration to rapid sniffing in anticipation of reward delivery, but in a distinct frequency band, 9-12 Hz. These results demonstrate the speed and precision of control over respiration and its significance for olfactory behavioral performance.     

A rose by any other name: would it smell as sweet?

We examined whether presenting an odor with a positive, neutral, or negative name would influence how people perceive it. In experiment 1, 40 participants rated 15 odors for their pleasantness, intensity, and arousal. In experiment 2, 30 participants passively smelled 10 odors while their skin conductance (SC), heart rate (HR), and sniffing were recorded. We found significant overall effects of odor names on perceived pleasantness, intensity, and arousal. Pleasantness showed the most robust effect of odor names: the same odors were perceived as more pleasant when presented with positive than with neutral and negative names and when presented with neutral than with negative names. In addition, odorants were rated as more intense when presented with negative than with neutral and positive names and as more arousing when presented with positive than with neutral names. Furthermore, SC and sniff volumes, but not HR, were modified by odor names, and the SC changes could not be accounted for by sniffing changes. Importantly, odor names presented with odorless water did not produce any effect on skin conductance and sniff volumes, ruling out the possibility that the naming-related findings were triggered by an emotional reaction to odor names. Taken together, these experiments show that there is a lot to a name, at least when it comes to olfactory perception.     

Spatial EEG correlates of nonassociative and associative olfactory learning in rabbits

Recent studies have shown that spatially distributed olfactory bulbar activity correlates with odor-specific behavioral responding (Coopersmith & Leon, 1984; Freeman & Grajski, 1987; Freeman & Schneider, 1982; Freeman & Viana di Prisco, 1986; Grajski, Breiman, Viana di Prisco, & Freeman, 1986; Gray, Freeman, & Skinner, 1986; Sullivan & Leon, 1986; Viana di Prisco & Freeman, 1985). The present studies established olfactory bulbar spatial electroencephalogram (EEG) correlates of nonassociative and associative learning in odorant stimulation in rabbits. Behavior was quantified by measuring magnitude and probability of the sniff response. It was shown that (a) olfactory bulbar spatial EEG amplitude patterns do not simply reflect odor (peripheral) stimulation, (b) repeated presentations of a nonreinforced odor initially reveal a transient EEG pattern change but the pattern change does not recur after the subject has habituated to the odor, and (c) repeated presentations of a reinforced odor (mild cutaneous shock), with a second nonreinforced odor serving as a control, reveal that coexisting, odor-specific spatial EEG amplitude patterns emerge with the acquisition of differential behavioral responding.     

Individual and synergistic effects of sniffing frequency and flow rate on olfactory bulb activity

Is faster or stronger sniffing important for the olfactory system? Odorant molecules are captured by sniffing. The features of sniffing constrain both the temporality and intensity of the input to the olfactory structures. In this context, it is clear that variations in both the sniff frequency and flow rate have a major impact on the activation of olfactory structures. However, the question of how frequency and flow rate individually or synergistically impact bulbar output has not been answered. We have addressed this question using multiple experimental approaches. In double-tracheotomized, anesthetized rats, we recorded both the bulbar local field potential (LFP) and mitral/tufted cells' activities when the sampling flow rate and frequency were controlled independently. We found that a tradeoff between the sampling frequency and the flow rate could maintain olfactory bulb sampling-related rhythmicity and that only an increase in flow rate could induce a faster, odor-evoked response. LFP and sniffing were recorded in awake rats. We found that sampling-related rhythmicity was maintained during high-frequency sniffing. Furthermore, we observed that the covariation between the frequency and flow rate, which was necessary for the tradeoff seen in the anesthetized preparations, also occurred in awake animals. Our study shows that the sampling frequency and flow rate can act either independently or synergistically on bulbar output to shape the neuronal message. The system likely takes advantage of this flexibility to adapt sniffing strategies to animal behavior. Our study provides additional support for the idea that sniffing and olfaction function in an integrated manner.     

Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat

The sense of smell is typically thought of as a 'slow' sense, but the true temporal constraints on the accuracy of olfactory perception are not known. It has been proposed that animals make finer odor discriminations at the expense of additional processing time. To test this idea, we measured the relationship between the speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in rats. We found that speed of discrimination was independent of odor similarity, as measured by overlap of glomerular activity patterns. Even when pushed to psychophysical limits using mixtures of two odors, rats needed to take only one sniff (<200 ms at theta frequency) to make a decision of maximum accuracy. These results show that, for the purpose of odor quality discrimination, a fully refined olfactory sensory representation can emerge within a single sensorimotor or theta cycle, suggesting that each sniff can be considered a snapshot of the olfactory world.     

Odor-related bulbar EEG spatial pattern analysis during appetitive conditioning in rabbits

Mildly thirsty rabbits were classically conditioned by reinforcement with water to give a discriminative licking response to the presentation of odors. The jaw movement component of the licking conditioned response (JM CR) was elicited only by the reinforced odor; an increase in the relative frequency of sniffing (RR CR) occurred to both reinforced (CS+) and nonreinforced (CS-) odors. Oscillatory electroencephalographic bursts of high-frequency (40-80 Hz) potentials were recorded epidurally from the lateral olfactory bulb with 64-electrode arrays (8 X 8, 3.5 X 3.5 mm) chronically implanted. Emphasis was on comparing bursts during odor presentation with bursts preceding odor arrival on each trial. A "detection" burst was characterized as occurring immediately after odor arrival and before the sniff response. "Discrimination" bursts occurred during the RR CR and before the JM CR onset. Significant air-odor burst differences (together with sniffing) occurred through up to six sessions for both CS+ and CS- odors for "discrimination" bursts but not for "detection" bursts.     

A detailed analysis of sucrose drinking in the rat

The present report represents an initial attempt to examine and quantify the eating and drinking patterns of rats presented with water, laboratory chow, and sucrose solution for 23 hours. The concentration of the sucrose solution was systematically increased (0.10 M, 0.25 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M) with a single concentration being presented to rats in four-day blocks. As has been previously shown, total intake (ml) of sucrose solution increased with concentration to a peak at 0.25 M and then decreased with further rises in concentration. Calories consumed from sucrose monotonically increased with concentration, reaching a maximum at 0.50 M. As calories consumed from sucrose increased with rising concentration, chow intake monotonically decreased. This compensatory decrease in chow intake was primarily attributable to decreases in nighttime chow consumption when the concentration of sucrose available was less than or equal to 0.25 M; when the concentration was greater than 0.25 M, further reductions in chow intake occurred during the day. Moreover, the decrease in chow intake was due solely to a reduction in the number of chow bouts. As the concentration of sucrose increased, the day-to-night ratio of sucrose intake approached unity. Bout volume increased with concentration to a broad peak spanning 0.25-0.5 M, and then decreased with 1.0 M. Bout duration changed with sucrose concentration such that the bout drinking rate (ml/min) was seen to monotonically increase, reaching a stable maximum at 0.5 M. Since the caloric intake per sucrose bout progressively increased with each rise in concentration, the asymptotic portion of the curve describing calories consumed from sucrose was attributable to alterations in sucrose bout number and not sucrose bout size.     

Chemical dependencies of learning in the rabbit olfactory bulb: acquisition of the transient spatial pattern change depends on norepinephrine

Intracerebral cannulas were implanted in both olfactory bulbs of 6 rabbits. A surface electrode-array (8 X 8) was implanted epidurally on the lateral surface of the left bulb. Each rabbit was conditioned to respond to sniffing to an odor paired with cutaneous shock while receiving continuous intrabulbar infusion of either vehicle or propranolol (100 microM at 1 microliter/hr) in vehicle. After two training sessions to the original odor, a response to a new odor was conditioned under the influence of the alternate infusate. Electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was sampled on inspirations before and during odor presentations. During vehicle infusion a transient alteration in the pattern of activity was acquired that occurred during the second and third inspirations following presentation of the reinforced odor. The acquisition did not occur when propranolol was infused. No significant pattern changes occurred with unreinforced odors in either condition. There was no local anesthetic effect of the racemic mixture of propranolol found for any type of electric activity, including antidromic spike activity observed in an independent control group. Intrabulbar norepinephrine injection (100 microM, 10 microL) resulted in an amplitude increase of the bulbar 40-80-Hz EEG and a potentiation of the transient spatial pattern change to a novel odor, when compared with those observed during vehicle infusion. It is concluded that norepinephrine released under centrifugal control may act to prevent or delay habituation that otherwise occurs rapidly to unreinforced odors.     

Assessing the effects of odorants on nasal airway size and breathing.

A technique was developed to obtain continuous measurements of both respiratory behavior and nasal patency in response to well-controlled odorant stimulation. An automated apparatus similar to that described by Walker et al. (27) was used to present precise concentrations of an odorant. The pressure-flow technique (28) was used to continuously measure nasal airway cross-sectional area, nasal airflow rate, air volume and time characteristics associated with breathing before and during odorant stimulation. Immediately following each odorant presentation, subjects entered their psychophysical responses into a microcomputer via an electronic mouse. Respiratory and psychophysical responses of ten normal subjects to four concentrations of acetic acid during eight odorant trials were recorded; eight clean-air trials were also conducted. At the highest concentration, changes in respiratory behavior were observed as early as 200 ms after stimulus onset in some subjects. Inspiratory volumes during odorant presentation were lower than those seen just before stimulation. The magnitude of this decrease was directly related to the concentration of acetic acid and to the perceived intensity of the odor and degree of nasal irritation.     

Warmth from skin-to-skin contact with mother is essential for the acquisition of filial huddling preference in preweanling rats

During a single, 2-hr session with a scented foster dam, preweanling rat pups form an affiliative attraction to an odor associated with the maternal caregiver, manifest as a huddling preference. To identify maternal stimuli that induce this filial preference, we quantitatively examined behavioral interactions during odor conditioning. Bout duration of skin-to-skin (STS) contact was positively associated with the preference. In contrast, simple physical contact and anogenital licking were not significantly related to the preference. The frequency of nonanogenital licking was negatively associated with the preference as well as with bout duration of STS contact. When odor conditioning was conducted with a warm cylinder, ambient warmth, or stroking as the unconditioned stimulus, only pups exposed to the warm cylinder exhibited a preference for the conditioned odor. These results suggest a positive, affiliative effect of maternal STS contact on pup filial preference, which may be disrupted by maternal licking.     

Facial wiping in the rat fetus: variation of chemosensory stimulus parameters

Fetal rats reliably express a facial wiping response to novel chemosensory stimuli. Previous research has examined facial wiping as an early form of motor coordination and as a behavioral indicator of sensory responsiveness. The present study examined how variation in stimulus parameters of lemon odor infusion (concentration, volume, and infusion time) affected the wiping response of E20 rat fetuses. Infusions of higher concentration or greater volume generally elicited wiping responses of greater duration and more strokes. Most facial wipes involved strokes by single forelimbs; however, bilaterally synchronous wiping was expressed only in bouts of at least seven wipes, and was facilitated by stimuli of moderate intensity. These findings suggest that the total number of wiping strokes or bout duration are well suited as measures of overall sensory responsiveness in the fetus and that chemosensory stimulus parameters exert a permissive influence on interlimb coordination during a bout of facial wiping.     

Olfactory bulb responses to odor stimulation: analysis of response pattern and intensity relationships

Extracellular recordings were made from mitral cells, tufted cells, and presumed glomerular layer and external plexiform layer interneurons of the olfactory bulb of anesthetized rats during odor stimulation. Intensity responses of these cells were studied by presenting a series of six or seven concentrations, spanning a range greater than two log units, in a cyclic artificial sniff paradigm, which produced repeated response measures at each concentration. Experiments focused on obtaining a complete intensity series, including interspersed unstimulated spontaneous activity records, for a single odorant (usually amyl acetate), but concentration responses to other odorants were tested when possible. Odor responses of 46 cells were studied with two approaches. Response form was examined in an attempt to define response classes based on qualitative characteristics of the temporal pattern of response. Assessment of response magnitude was attempted, in order to construct stimulus-response functions for each cell, independent of response form. As previously reported for olfactory bulb cells, the cells in our sample responded to odor stimulation with spike trains of a variety of temporal patterns, consisting of excitatory and inhibitory components that were frequently recognizable in the responses of a cell across a range of concentrations. However, response patterns usually changed significantly with concentration, such that response form across the concentration range could not be predicted from the response at any one concentration. Responses of different cells were sometimes similar to each other in form at one concentration and quite different from each other in the rest of their concentration-response profiles. Classification of response profiles into discrete types, based on consistency of response form throughout the profile, was therefore not feasible. In agreement with other reports, response of a single cell to different odorants sometimes showed similar forms and sometimes showed very different forms across the concentration-response profiles. Since the response form depends on the stimulus intensity as well as the stimulus quality, characterization of response magnitude and of the pattern of response to different odors require testing with a series of stimulus concentrations. Because odor responses consisted of temporally patterned spike trains, whose components changed in complex ways with stimulus intensity, it was not possible to quantify response magnitude by measuring characteristics of particular response components or counting mean frequency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)