Elderly Patients with Epilepsy: Specific Requirements

Summary: Epilepsy is the third most common neurologic disorder in the elderly and, combined with the progressive aging of the population, this high incidence will lead to an increasing number of elderly patients who require epilepsy care. Treatment of epilepsy in elderly patients is often complicated by the physiologic changes that occur in old age, e.g., reduced absorption, slower metabolism, and deterioration of liver and renal function. Another consideration is that elderly patients are most likely to be suffering from other diseases, necessitating multiple therapies. The potential for drug interactions is therefore high. Because of these factors, traditional antiepileptic drug (AED) therapies are associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects in elderly patients than in younger patients. Tiagabine (TGB) is one of a family of new AEDs recently developed. The newer AEDs tend to have a comparable antiepileptic efficacy and a lower potential for toxicity compared with the traditional AEDs. Clinical studies have shown that age appears to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of TGB and that there is little difference in the incidence of adverse events between elderly and young patients. Although clinical experience with TGB in the elderly is still limited, TGB shows promise for treatment of epilepsy in the elderly population.     

Characteristics of patients initiated on the new antiepileptic drugs: a PADS study

Whereas randomized controlled trials remain a standard for evaluating and comparing efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), postmarketing drug research offers a useful means of comparing efficacy and safety of new AEDs. However, differences in baseline characteristics of patients in different drug groups create the potential for bias in drug comparison studies. In this study, baseline demographic characteristics of 1,386 patients initiating lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), or topiramate (TPM) were compared to identify patient characteristics that may influence AED use in epilepsy patients. Data were collected at 14 epilepsy centers and included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and prior adverse events. There were 402 patients in the LTG group, 725 TPM, and 259 TGB. The groups differed both in their number of concurrent AEDs (p<0.001) and in their number of prior AEDs (p<0.01). There was no difference in proportion with partial versus generalized epilepsy syndromes. The groups differed in the proportions of patients with complex partial seizures (p=0.049), primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (p=0.01), and myoclonic seizures (p=0.03). Baseline behavioral adverse event rate was lowest in patients initiating TPM (p<0.01); LTG patients had the lowest rate of prior AED-related rash (p=0.02). There was no relationship between AED assignment and patient age, age of epilepsy onset, epilepsy duration, institutionalization status, gender, or psychiatric history. Numerous epidemiological differences were identified among patients placed on the new AEDs, including current and prior AED profiles, seizure types, and prior adverse event history. Accounting for these differences is of crucial importance because they may bias conclusions of nonrandomized post-marketing trials comparing the drugs.     

Population Analysis of the Pharmacokinetics of Tiagabine in Patients with Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: In two open-label long-term safety studies, we determined tiagabine (TGB) pharmacokinetics in patients with epilepsy.
Methods: In all, 2,147 plasma samples from 511 patients who participated in the studies were available. The total daily dose ranged from 2 mg administered once daily to 80 mg administered in four doses. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was used to fit the TGB plasma concentration-time data, with a population pharmacokinetic approach.
Results: The patients'average (±SD) weight and age were 73.8 ± 20.7 kg and 32.1 ± 12.3 years. The most significantly factor affecting TGB pharmacokinetics was concomitant administration of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The central clearance value in patients receiving AEDs known to induce hepatic drug metabolism was 21.4 L/h, a value 67% higher than the central clearance estimate obtained for the patients receiving AEDs not known to affect hepatic drug metabolism (12.8 L/h). There was no evidence of any dose or time effect, indicating that TGB pharmacokinetics are linear. TGB pharmacokinetics were not different in white, black, or Hispanic patients, although our ability to explore racial effects was limited since 90% of the patients were white. No other demographic variables (including age and smoking) or any clinical chemistry measurements (including bilirubin, SGOT, and SGPT) were important in explaining the variability in the clearance estimates.
Conclusions: TGB pharmacokinetics are linear, influenced by enzyme-inducing AEDs, and largely unaffected by other demographic variables.     

International Experience with Tiagabine Add-On Therapy

Summary: Tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) that is a potent and specific inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake into glial and neuronal elements. In accordance with medical and regulatory standards, the clinical development program for TGB as an AED has assessed the value of TGB in add-on treatment, focusing mainly on partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures. Five add-on, placebo-controlled trials and six non-comparative, open-label, long-term multicenter trials have been or are being conducted in Australia, Europe, and the U.S.A. The results of these trials, involving 2,261 patients, indicate that TGB has efficacy as add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy difficult to control with existing AEDs. Efficacy of TGB is also sustained with long-term treatment. A clear dose-response has been demonstrated, and the minimal effective dose level is 30 mg. TGB is also tolerated, and with long-term therapy no new or more severe types of adverse events develop. These studies have included a wide age range of patients, including adolescents and the elderly.     

Epilepsy in the elderly

The elderly are the most rapidly growing segment of our population, and onset of epilepsy is higher in this age group than in any other. With advancing age, there are changes in drug absorption, disposition, and binding. In addition, within the elderly are subgroups: (1) elderly healthy except for epilepsy (EH) and (2) elderly with multiple medical problems (EMMP). This review examines the factors that need to be considered when selecting the appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) for an elderly person with epilepsy. Both the older and newer AEDs are reviewed.     

Comparison of the cognitive effects of tiagabine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adult patients with partial epilepsy: pooled analysis of two long-term, randomized, follow-up studies

PURPOSE: Patients with epilepsy are at greater risk for cognitive impairment than are age- and education-matched controls. Cognitive decline is a significant adverse event associated with many first-generation anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs); however, the past decade has seen the introduction of several new AEDs with more-favorable cognitive profiles. Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures. The cognitive effects of TGB and carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy were evaluated in adult epilepsy patients with partial seizures. METHODS: This analysis pooled data from two randomized studies with similar populations, dosing, and cognitive assessments. TGB was titrated to 20-30 mg/day and CBZ to 400-800 mg/day over a 6-week period. A control or no-drug group of untreated patients with a single epileptic seizure was included for comparison. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 105 epilepsy patients enrolled, 79 completed the 52 weeks of monotherapy (TGB, 74%; CBZ, 77%). Altogether, 19 untreated patients composed the no-drug group. During the 52-week follow-up, only one statistically significant difference was found between the treatment groups and the no-drug group [verbal fluency task: F(2, 92) = 3.16; p = 0.047]. On further analysis, it was determined that this statistical difference was solely based on the patients receiving CBZ performing worse than the control group (p = 0.048). Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found on six (26%) of 23 variables with TGB and CBZ, as well as the no-drug group, although the variables differed between the groups. Significant worsening in the test scores was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this 52-week, follow-up study show that successful TGB monotherapy with 20-30 mg/day has a cognitive profile similar to that of successful long-term CBZ monotherapy with 400-800 mg/day in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy and to that of untreated patients with a single seizure. We observed no significant decline in cognitive scores associated with TGB monotherapy.     

A review of the antiepileptic drug tiagabine

Tiagabine (TGB), a recently approved antiepileptic drug (AED), has a specific mechanism of action that is unique among AEDs. A potent AED with linear, predictable pharmacokineties, it inhibits gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake into neurons and glia. Tiagabine does not have any clinically relevant effects on hepatic metabolism or on serum concentrations of other AEDs, nor does it interact with commonly used non-AEDs. The most common side effects of TGB in controlled studies are dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, accidental injury, infection, headache, nausea, and nervousness. These events are usually mild to moderate in severity and generally do not require medical intervention. At dosages of 30-56 mg daily, TGB is an effective add-on treatment for partial seizures. Although patients who have medically refractory epilepsy can be converted to TGB monotherapy, more controlled studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of TGB as monotherapy and to determine the effective dosage range.     

Adults with Epilepsy: Is Monotherapy the Only Answer?

Summary: Monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be the aim in most patients with epilepsy and is achievable in most newly diagnosed cases. "Rational po-lytherapy" is a valuable new concept that can be usefully applied to a minority of patients. Assessment of new AEDs as monotherapy is a challenging problem, and appropriate clinical trial methodology is currently evolving. Although tiagabine (TGB) is established as an effective add-on agent in refractory partial epilepsy, its role in monotherapy is not yet clear. Preliminary studies suggest that TGB is effective and well tolerated as monotherapy. Ongoing large monotherapy studies should establish the comparative efficacy and tolerability of TGB vs. conventional AEDs.     

Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Women with Epilepsy: Must Contraception and Pregnan Add to the Burden of Epilepsy?

Summary: In addition to seizure control, women with epilepsy face particular complications associated with menstruation, fertility, contraception, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. With traditional long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy there is a risk of menstrual irregularities, contraceptive failure, and adverse pregnancy outcome. Many women intentionally discontinue AED therapy during pregnancy because of concerns about the risk of fetal malformation and effects on fetal growth and development. However, trauma resulting from seizures is the leading cause of maternal and fetal death in women with epilepsy. In addition, mothers are concerned about the presence of AEDs in breast milk and therefore tend to choose bottle feeding. Clearly, a balance must be achieved between seizure control for the mother and exposure of the fetus or infant to AEDs. Tiagabine (TGB) is a new AED which acts by inhibiting uptake of the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid into glial cells. Animal studies show that TGB has no toxic effects either on reproductive function or on the developing fetus, although there is still insufficient evidence to permit conclusions from human studies. TGB does not induce hepatic metabolism, and a study in healthy volunteers indicates no interaction with oral contraceptives. It is hoped that the availability of new AEDs such as TGB, with the promise of a better safety profile and a lower propensity for drug interactions, will alleviate the burden for women with epilepsy.     

Tiagabine in the Management of Epilepsy

Summary: Tiagabine (TGB) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that uniquely reduces the uptake of the inhibitory neurotransmitter -γ-aminobutyric acid into presynaptic neuronal and glial cells. It is metabolized in the liver with an elimination half-life of approximately 7 to 9 h. Although TGB does not induce or inhibit hepatic metabolic processes, it does provide a target for other enzyme-inducing AEDs. TGB has proved effective as add-on treatment for partial seizures, with or without becoming secondarily generalized, as demonstrated in five placebo-controlled trials and six long-term open studies. Preliminary results with TGB in children with refractory epilepsy and as monotherapy are promising. Few patients withdrew from these trials because of adverse events. The most common side effects with TGB involved the central nervous system, i.e., dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, nervousness, headache, and tremor. Most adverse events occurred during dosage titration, were often transient, and were usually of mild to moderate severity. The recommended maintenance dose for TGB, when combined with enzyme-inducing drugs as add-on therapy, is 30 to 50 mg/day. Trials are under way in patients with primarily generalized seizures and in newly diagnosed epilepsy. TGB is a well-tolerated and effective novel AED that will find an enduring place in the management of epilepsy.     

Occurrence of psychosis in patients with epilepsy randomized to tiagabine or placebo treatment

PURPOSE: Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy have a higher incidence of psychiatric problems and possibly greater intolerance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than do other patients with epilepsy. Concern has been raised that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs may be associated with treatment-emergent psychosis. Tiagabine (TGB; Gabitril), a new AED that blocks synaptic GABA uptake, was developed in trials of drug-resistant patients with epilepsy. We conducted ad hoc analyses of adverse events, drug intolerance, and treatment response to evaluate the association between TGB treatment and psychosis and whether psychiatric history might be predictive of tolerance or effectiveness of this GABAergic drug. METHODS: Data were analyzed from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of add-on TGB therapy (32 or 56 mg daily) in 554 adolescents and adults with complex partial seizures (CPSs). After an 8- or 12-week baseline phase, double-blind treatment consisted of a 4-week titration period (with TGB dose gradually increased to 32 or 56 mg daily) and an 8- or 12-week fixed-dose period. Adverse events commonly associated with psychosis were evaluated. Treatment intolerance and effectiveness (> or =50% reduction in CPS rate) were compared among patients with and without psychiatric histories. RESULTS: Psychotic symptoms (hallucinations) were observed in three (0.8%) of 356 TGB-treated patients and none of 198 placebo-treated patients (p = 0.556, NS). Statistical analysis showed no interaction between psychiatric history and drug intolerance or treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: TGB administration appears to carry no significant increased risk of treatment-emergent psychosis. Psychiatric history was not predictive of the tolerance or effectiveness of the drug.     

Epilepsy in the elderly: comparing clinical characteristics with younger patients

The prevalence and incidence of epilepsies in elderly is high. Due to demographic development, the portion of elderly patients with epilepsy will continue to rise over the next decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate seizure semiology, etiology, comorbidity, and therapy in elderly patients dependent on onset of epilepsy and in comparison with younger patients. In a prospective multicentre study, 202 epilepsy patients were included in a consecutive manner and subdivided into three groups (group A1: >65 years, onset of epilepsy after the age of 65 years; group A2: >65 years with early onset epilepsy, seizure onset before the age of 50 years; and group B: <50 years with epilepsy). Clinical data with respect to epilepsy, seizures, comorbidity, etiology, and anti‐epileptic drug (AED) therapy were assessed using a questionnaire developed especially for these patient groups and filled out by the physicians. The clinical profile with regard to etiology, postictal conditions, and comorbidities clearly depends on the age of the patients and age of onset of epilepsy. Patients with an epilepsy onset after 65 years need lower doses of AEDs, gain better seizure control and have more concomitant diseases than younger patients or elderly epilepsy patients with early‐onset epilepsy.     

Epilepsy in the elderly

There are many unique characteristics in elderly patients with epilepsy. The incidence of seizure in this age group is the highest of any age group and continues to increase as people live longer. Etiology of seizures is different than for adults and includes cerebrovascular disease, dementia, closed head injury, and metabolic encephalopathies. The elderly patient with epilepsy most often presents with complex partial seizures that have a higher recurrence rate than the younger population. The seizures are often difficult to diagnose since they present with atypical symptoms, particularly prolonged postictal symptoms, including memory lapses, confusion, altered mental status, and inattention. There are also therapeutic challenges due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics, including variations in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. These must be considered when selecting antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy to avoid harmful side effects. In addition, several of the AEDs have drug-drug interactions, a problem potentially exacerbated in this population of patients due to the use of medications for comorbid conditions.     

Pharmacological and clinical aspects of antiepileptic drug use in the elderly

In this article, epidemiological and clinical aspects related to the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the elderly are highlighted. Studies have shown that people with epilepsy receiving AED treatment show important deficits in physical and social functioning compared with age-matched people without epilepsy. To what extent these deficits can be ascribed to epilepsy per se or to the consequences of AED treatment remains to be clarified. The importance of characterizing the effects of AEDs in an elderly population is highlighted by epidemiological surveys indicating that the prevalence of AED use is increased in elderly people, particularly in those living in nursing homes. Both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of AEDs may be altered in old age, which may contribute to the observation that AEDs are among the drug classes most commonly implicated as causing adverse drug reactions in an aged population. Age alone is one of several contributors to alterations in AED response in the elderly; other factors include physical frailty, co-morbidities, dietary influences, and drug interactions. Individualization of dosage, avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, and careful observation of clinical response are essential for an effective and safe utilization of AEDs in an elderly population.     

Tiagabine in glial tumors

RATIONALE AND PURPOSE: Preliminary reports have suggested a possible 'aetiology-specific' efficacy of tiagabine (TGB) in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy (DRPE) related to cerebral glial tumors (GTs). This efficacy should be related to selective blocking of GAT-1 transporter by TGB. We presented our open-label, add-on TGB experience in a group of patients with GTs, compared with other symptomatic DRPEs of different aetiology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eleven patients with DRPE related to oligodendroglioma (six cases), astrocytoma (4) or multiform gliobastoma (1); 12 patients with DRPE related to a miscellanea of CNS lesions. TGB was added to previous AEDs, at dosage of 20-60 mg per die. Responders are defined by seizure frequency reduction >50% compared with baseline. RESULTS: Seven patients are responders with three seizure-free (SF) in GTs group, a rate of efficacy much higher than in matching group (63.6 vs. 16.6%). Adverse events have been observed only rarely, not leading to discontinuation, in GTs group. CONCLUSION: This preliminary observation seems to confirm the high efficacy and tolerability of TGB in DRPE related to GTs.     

Drug absorption in the elderly: biopharmaceutical considerations for the antiepileptic drugs

The management of antiepileptic drug (AED) pharmacokinetics remains a challenge in the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Drug characteristics, such as protein binding, mechanisms of drug elimination, and the potential for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions, are important considerations for drug selection and may help determine overall effectiveness. In elderly patients with epilepsy, the likelihood of polytherapy, along with physiological changes associated with aging, can make pharmacokinetic issues even more significant. One aspect of pharmacokinetics that has received less attention is the process of oral drug absorption. Aging can have variable effects on the gastrointestinal system. Some of these physiological changes have the potential to impact absorption patterns of some medications, including AEDs. Altered oral protective reflexes, xerostomia, and delayed esophageal emptying in elderly patients may complicate oral administration of some medications. Altered gastric pH could modify drug absorption, and modified gastric emptying rates can influence the bioavailability of some AEDs. Finally, intestinal transit times may be slower in elderly patients compared to younger patients, possibly altering the absorption of some AEDs. These age-related physiological changes that may affect AED pharmacokinetics should be considered when treating elderly patients with epilepsy.     

The choice of antiepileptic drugs in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a national French survey.

The choice of an antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients with epilepsy is mainly based on efficacy and safety of each drug. However, these criteria of drug selection should be further evaluated according to the epileptic syndromes, and adjusted to the sex and age of the patient. Unfortunately, very few studies have been conducted based on these latter criteria. We conducted a survey on the management of epilepsy treatment in adults. This survey was undertaken in France, and led to the establishment of a French consensus on antiepileptic drug treatment in adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Patients were grouped into 18 categories according to the epileptic syndrome (absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, undetermined idiopathic generalized epilepsy, symptomatic or cryptogenic partial epilepsy and unclassified epilepsy), and to the patient's gender and age. Our survey suggests that there is a consensus among French epileptologists for the choice of AEDs, mainly based on the epilepsy syndrome. Gender also plays a crucial role. Sodium valproate and lamotrigine are the two drugs of choice for generalized epilepsies, as well as for undetermined epilepsies. Lamotrigine is often prefered for women of childbearing age. First line AEDs in partial epilepsy are carbamazepine (particularly for men), lamotrigine (particularly for women), and gabapentin (in the elderly). In cases of failure and/or intolerance to one of these AED, the principal alternatives are oxcarbazepine, sodium valproate and topiramate.     

Role of valproate across the ages. Treatment of epilepsy in the elderly

In June 2005, a team of experts participated in a workshop with the objective of reaching agreement on several important aspects of valproate in the treatment of elderly patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy in the elderly is relatively common and its incidence increases for each decade after age 60. The aetiology and manifestations of epilepsies in the elderly are complex because of comorbidity and other underlying risk factors. A consensus was reached that elderly patients who present with a seizure disorder should be referred rapidly to a specialist and that diagnosis should be improved by using a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists, neurologists and epilepsy experts (syncope, falls and seizure specialists). This is especially important to avoid mistreatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). There was consensus that the elderly are generally more susceptible to the adverse effects of AEDs than younger adults. For these reasons, in older persons AEDs should be started at low dosages, and titrated slowly according to clinical response. Some of the most troublesome side effects of AEDs in the elderly include sedation and cognitive side effects, as well as osteoporosis. Drug–drug interactions should be given special consideration. There was consensus that the pharmacokinetics of all AEDs are altered in the elderly, and that the most significant change common to all AEDs is a moderate reduction in renal and metabolic clearance. Predicting pharmacokinetic changes in the individual, however, can be very difficult because multiple factors contribute to a high inter-patient variability. There was agreement on the advantages and disadvantages of the use of valproate in the elderly, and consensus that valproate is a useful option in this population. There was no consensus, however, on whether valproate should be considered among the preferred first-line treatments in the elderly.     

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.