Radiolucent zone of the patella following total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

Background

The radiolucent zones in the patella are sometimes observed in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing. On the basis of radiological findings from our clinical experience, we hypothesize that the pathogenesis of this lesion may be similar to that of the lesions of spontaneous osteonecrosis, and this lesion may be due to both osteoporosis and stress concentration. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of the radiolucent zone after TKA without patellar resurfacing. Moreover, the roles of osteoporosis and patellar morphology, which are related to the stress distribution in the patella, were also investigated.

Methods

We studied 48 knees of 38 patients who underwent primary TKA using the Genesis II prosthesis. Axial radiographs taken 1 year postoperatively were used to assess the incidence of the radiolucent zone. The World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score and the preoperative patellar facet angle were compared between patients with and without the radiolucent zones.

Results

Five patellae (10.4 %) showed the radiolucent zones postoperatively (the radiolucent group), whereas no such lesions were found in the remaining 43 patellae (the normal group). The major osteoporotic fracture risk of the radiolucent group calculated using the FRAX was 24.8 % and significantly higher than that in the normal group (14.7 %; p = 0.01). The average patellar facet angle in the radiolucent group was 123.6°, which was significantly smaller than that in the normal group (133.6°; p = 0.003).

Discussion and conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that both underlying osteoporosis and a steep patellar facet angle may play an important role in the pathogenesis of the radiolucent zones in patellae after TKA without patellar resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing may be considered, particularly in osteoporotic patients who have a steep patellar facet angle, to avoid the appearance of the postoperative radiolucent zone in the patella.     

Technique for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

The proper size of the patellar component for a total knee arthroplasty can be determined with the use of a caliper. The thickness of the patella is measured prior to removing the articular surface and again after the trial component has been inserted into the patella. The measurements should be approximately the same in thickness. It is important to select the proper patellar component to avoid loss of flexion of the knee, a very prominent patella, and postoperative subluxation of the patella.     

Asymmetric patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Three hundred consecutive primary, cemented, condylar total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were reviewed for the presence of asymmetric patella resurfacing using a postoperative Merchant or sunrise patellar radiograph. Twenty-one knees in 14 patients were found to have the patella asymmetrically resurfaced. Asymmetric resurfacing typically involved the inadvertent preferential resurfacing of the lateral facet with underresection of bone from the medial patellar facet. All patients underwent follow-up for a minimum of 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. Of the 21 knees, 3 revisions were required for patellar complications. One patellar component was loose on radiographs and there was marked patellofemoral pain in 6 knees. Overall, 11 of 21 knees (52%) underwent revision or were recommended for revision for patellar complications or had anterior knee pain that limited activities. Inadvertent asymmetric patella resurfacing using the kinematic condylar implant adversely affects the outcome after TKA.     

全膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与否对膝前痛发生的影响

[目的]回顾性分析、比较全膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与否对膝前痛发生的影响,为临床治疗提供参考。[方法]对1994年10月~2004年10月行人工全膝关节置换术病人125例(148膝)按髌骨置换(84膝)和未置换(64膝)分为2组,并对其随访资料进行分析,膝关节评分采用HSS评分系统,髌骨评分采用Feller评分标准。结果使用SPSS统计软件进行统计学分析。[结果]置换组HSS评分由术前的(39.6±39.8)分进步为末次随访时的(90.9±8.2)分,髌骨评分由(14.4±6.4)分进步到(25.2±4.8)分,膝前痛分数也由(4.6±3.9)分进步为(10.6±4.1)分;未置换组HSS评分由术前的(38.8±9.8)分进步为(90.2±8.9)分,髌骨评分由(14.2±6.2)分进步到(25.1±4.8)分,膝前痛分数也由(4.8±3.8)分进步为(10.3±4.1)分。2组患者末次随访时膝前痛均较术前明显减轻,差异有显著性意义;置换组与未置换组比较,膝前痛减轻的差别无显著性意义。[结论]无论髌骨置换与否,患者的合理选择和正确的手术操作是避免术后膝前痛的关键所在。     

Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether resurfacing the patellar component during total knee replacement (TKR) influences the clinical outcome. DESIGN: A retrospective study of data gathered prospectively during the recovery course of patients who underwent TKR with or without patellar resurfacing. SETTING: Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, NS. PATIENTS: One hundred and eighty-five patients operated on between 1992 and 1995. The inclusion criteria were (a) osteoarthritis, (b) replacement carried out by 2 independent surgeons, (c) no comorbid illness such as rheumatoid arthritis, cancer or infection, (d) pre- and postoperative attendance at the assessment clinics. INTERVENTION: TKR with (45) or without (140) patellar replacement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion (ROM), pain assessment, Hospital Severity Score (HSS) and complications. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with respect to ROM, pain, HSS and complications postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing the patella during TKR does not seem to influence the clinical outcome with respect to ROM, pain and overall complications. The decision should be based on individual criteria, depending on the preoperative and intraoperative findings. Randomized clinical trials assessing ROM, pain, complications and cost-effectiveness with long-term follow-up are necessary to further investigate this controversial issue.     

Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Twenty-five patients who received bilateral total knee prostheses were studied to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of patellar resurfacing. Only patients with advanced patellofemoral disease were included in the study. In all patients, patellar resurfacing had been done in the right knee but not in the left knee. The DePuy porous-coated implant was used in all cases. Subjective criteria were compared with objective criteria, which included range of motion, knee flexion and extension, and roentgenographic evaluation. The findings in this study suggest that patellar resurfacing can offer the patient a superior knee with regard to pain relief and strength.     

The role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

The ideal treatment of the patella in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. Although data exist in the literature to support either resurfacing or not resurfacing the patella, evidence continues to emerge that unresurfaced patellas deteriorate with time. Recent prospective, randomized studies also favor patellar resurfacing over retaining the native patella, reporting reoperation rates to convert unresurfaced to resurfaced patellas exceeding those for complications after patellar resurfacing. In addition, the incidence of residual patellofemoral pain after secondary resurfacing is substantially higher than when patellofemoral resurfacing is done primarily. Patient selection criteria are critical in the decision-making process. Patellofemoral complications, the greatest argument against resurfacing, have been diminished with improved surgical techniques and implant design.     

Should the patella be resurfaced in total knee arthroplasty? Efficacy of patellar resurfacing

To assess the long-term efficacy of patellar resurfacing, 100 knees were evaluated in 84 patients. The operations were performed between 1978 and 1982. The follow-up period ranged from 60 to 103 months. The diagnosis was degenerative joint disease (DJD) in 83%, rheumatoid arthritis in 12%, and miscellaneous in 5% of the knees. The implant (47 knees) and nonimplant (53 knees) groups were comparable with respect to age, body size, and length of follow-up period. The analysis revealed equivocal results. Considering all diagnostic categories combined, rest pain was marginally better in the resurfaced group (p = 0.04), but this difference resulted from an unequal distribution of subjects between mild and zero pain categories. Pain with walking, maximum walking distance, ability to climb stairs and rise from a chair, active arc of motion, extensor lag, and quadriceps strength were similar in the two groups. When the DJD group was considered separately, no significant difference emerged. There was little evidence to support a recommendation for routine patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.     

The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

The controversy over whether or not to routinely resurface the patella during a total knee arthroplasty has persisted despite three decades of successful joint replacement procedures. Advocates for routine patellar resurfacing admit the occasional need for secondary patellar resurfacing and declare increased incidence of anterior knee pain in patients with non‐resurfaced patellae as a cause for worry. Surgeons that leave the patella unresurfaced cite avoidance of complications that include patellar fracture, avascular necrosis, patellar tendon injury and instability. This review discusses the available literature on patellar resurfacing through an evidence‐based analysis of randomized and pseudo‐randomized controlled trials and published meta‐analyses to date. The published literature seems to favour resurfacing the patellar routinely. Selective patellar resurfacing would be the ideal solution if sound pre‐operative criteria could be established. So far, a method for accurately predicting which patients can avoid patellar resurfacing has not been found. Future research looking at patellar resurfacing should concentrate on developing criteria for selecting those patients that would benefit from patellar resurfacing and those that would do as well without resurfacing, and thus, limiting potential surgical complications.     

膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与非髌骨置换比较的Meta分析

[目的]系统评价全膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与否对术后疗效的影响,为临床治疗提供参考。[方法]全面搜索国内外关于膝关节置换术中髌骨置换和非髌骨置换的随机对照研究资料,按照既定的纳入、排除标准,核定检出符合评价标准的文献,提取所需研究数据,采用RevMan 4.2软件进行Meta分析。[结果]纳入随机对照研究16篇,共计1 922例膝关节置换术。Meta分析结果显示,髌骨置换组术后5年内发生膝前痛的风险降低,加权后RR=0.53,95%CI(0.30,0.94),但5年后二者无明显统计学差异。髌骨置换组术后5年以上发生再手术的风险低,加权后RR=0.35,95%CI(0.18,0.66),但5年内二者无明显统计学差异。膝关节KSS评分不论是亚组分析还是总体分析,均无统计学差异。总体分析结果,KSS评分加权均数差值为0.44,95%CI(-1.22,2.09)。[结论]全膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与非髌骨置换相比,术后5年内膝前痛发生率低,术后5年以上再手术的风险低,关节评分无明显差别。髌骨置换与非髌骨置换的优劣仍需大规模多中心的RCT来进一步研究。     

Advantages of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Complications of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty have rekindled the interest of many surgeons in patellar retention. In a prospective study 20 randomly selected patients of 40 underwent patellar resurfacing in combination with their total knee arthroplasty. The other 20 patients were left with an unresurfaced patella. Within 24 months of follow-up, the advantages of patellar resurfacing could be seen according to the Knee Society Score. Especially in advanced osteoarthritis of the knee joint, the patients achieved better scores in climbing stairs and in function. The superior functional results are arguments for patellar resurfacing, at least in knees with advanced osteoarthritis.     

The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

One hundred total knee replacements with a total condylar prosthesis and without patellar resurfacing were followed for a minimum of two years. Eighty-four per cent of the knees were affected by osteoarthrosis. Graded according to the knee-rating system of the Hospital for Special Surgery, there were eighteen excellent, fifty-three good, eighteen fair, and eleven poor results. At the most recent follow-up, twenty-nine knees (29 per cent), nine of which were affected by rheumatoid arthritis, were still painful in the patellofemoral area. The height and weight of the patient definitely influenced the amount of patellofemoral pain postoperatively. Small patients who had osteoarthrosis were exceptionally free of pain, regardless of sex, age, or level of activity. It seems that the best approach to patellofemoral replacement includes resurfacing of the patella in all patients who have rheumatoid arthritis and in patients who have osteoarthrosis if they have preoperative patellofemoral pain, are more than 160 centimeters tall, weigh more than sixty kilograms, and have advanced changes in the patella at the time of the operation.     

Evidence in orthopaedics: patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract Four good quality randomized clinical trials comparing patellar resurfacing versus noresurfacing in knee arthroplasty are analyzed. The outcomes evaluated were anterior knee pain, scores on the Knee Societys rating system and reoperation.No relevant differences were found in knee scores, but anterior knee pain was less frequent in patients with patellar resurfacing. Few patients had severe anterior knee pain. Still, patients with anterior knee pain were less satisfied with the clinical result. Studies with longer follow-up showed that anterior knee pain increased with time in both groups. A clinically relevant increase in reoperation rate in the nonresurfaced group could not be excluded with the numbers available.Anterior knee pain seems to be influenced by the decision of resurfacing the patella during knee arthoplasty. Although it is not associated with important changes in knee scores, patients perceive it as a cause of insatisfaction. Influence of patellar resurfacing on implant supervivence is not clear.     

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.84, P = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.     

The efficacy of patellar decompression for improving anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

Background

Anterior knee pain remains common following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of patellar decompression via drilling for the treatment of anterior knee pain following TKA without patellar resurfacing.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed in 271 consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee replacement with patellar decompression (study group, n = 131) or without decompression (control group, n = 140). The patients were assessed according to the Knee Society rating, clinical anterior knee pain score, and British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score in each group. Each assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been decompressed. Radiographic evaluations were also performed according to the Knee Society scoring system for functional activity and our own severity grade system for patellofemoral articular change.

Results

There were no adverse events following patellar decompression. The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.71). However, patients presenting pain over grade II after the operation in the study group were statistically low (p = 0.01). The overall postoperative knee scores were higher in the study group, but there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.0731). Analyses of the radiographs revealed similar postoperative outcomes in both groups of knees.

Conclusions

As we observed significantly lower rates of anterior knee pain and no patellar complications following patellar decompression via drilling in TKA without patellar resurfacing, we recommend performing patellar decompression in cases of total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing.     

Secondary resurfacing of the patella in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the impact of secondary patellar resurfacing in patients with patellar-related anterior knee pain who have undergone a mobile-bearing primary knee arthroplasty without resurfacing. MATERIALS: A total of 2950 primary Low Contact Stress (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) mobile-bearing knee arthroplasties without patellar resurfacing were carried out between March 1992 and March 2003. Thirteen patients (0.4%) underwent secondary patellar resurfacing for patellar-related anterior knee pain. The mean age of the patients was 67.8 years. There was a mean time of 28 months to the secondary resurfacing procedure. RESULTS: Only 4 patients had an unequivocal improvement in their symptoms at a mean follow-up of 45 months (range, 3-92 months). No morbidity was noted from the procedure. CONCLUSION: The success rate of secondary patellar resurfacing is poor and patients should be counseled carefully.     

Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing

Background and purpose

Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is disputed and new prosthesis designs have been introduced without documentation of their survival. We assessed the impact on prosthesis survival of patella resurfacing and of prosthesis brand, based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Patients and methods

5 prosthesis brands in common use with and without patella resurfacing from 1994 through 2009 were included n = 11,887. The median follow-up times were 9 years for patella-resurfaced implants and 7 years for implants without patella resurfacing. For comparison of prosthesis brands, also brands in common use with only one of the two treatment options were included in the study population (n = 25,590). Cox regression analyses were performed with different reasons for revision as endpoints with adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

We observed a reduced overall risk of revision for patella resurfaced (PR) TKAs, but the statistical significance was borderline (RR = 0.84, p = 0.05). At 15 years, 92% of PR and 91% of patella non resurfaced (NR) prostheses were still unrevised. However, PR implants had a lower risk of revision due to pain alone (RR = 0.1, p < 0.001), but a higher risk of revision due to loosening of the tibial component (RR = 1.4, p = 0.03) and due to a defective polyethylene insert (RR = 3.2, p < 0.001).At 10 years, the survival for the reference NR brand AGC Universal was 93%. The NR brands Genesis I, Duracon, and Tricon (RR = 1.4–1.7) performed statistically significantly worse than NR AGC Universal, while the NR prostheses e.motion, Profix, and AGC Anatomic (RR = 0.1–0.7), and the PR prostheses NexGen and AGC Universal (RR = 0.4–0.5) performed statistically significantly better. LCS, NexGen, LCS Complete (all NR), and Tricon, Genesis I, LCS, and Kinemax (all PR) showed no differences in this respect from the reference brand. A lower risk of revision (crude) was found for TKAs performed after 2000 as compared to those performed earlier (RR = 0.8, p = 0.001).

Interpretation

Although revision risk was similar for PR and NR TKAs, we found important differences in reasons for revision. Our results also indicate that survivorship of TKAs has improved.Use of a patellar component (patella resurfacing) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still disputed. The search for improvements has resulted in the introduction of several new designs that are widely used nowadays, although there is no documentation about their survival.The question of whether or not primary patella resurfacing should be recommended has led to several observational studies, randomized clinical trials (RCT), and meta-analyses (Forster 2004, Parvizi et al. 2005, Nizard et al. 2005, Pakos et al. 2005) and review articles (Meneghini 2008). In a critical appraisal of the available evidence, Calvisi et al. (2009) were not able to find any clear superiority between either of the two treatments due to methodological limitations in the published studies. Studies based on data from arthroplasty registers have found a higher risk of revision when the patella was left untreated (Furnes et al. 2002, the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2009, Clements et al. 2010). Furnes et al. 2002) found that the increased revision risk was mainly related to revisions due to pain. Some recent studies have, however, indicated that there is no difference in patients'' perception of postoperative pain in the two groups of treatment (Johnston et al. 2009, Lygre et al. 2010) and that the observed differences in risk of revision due to pain may be caused by the exclusive option of a secondary patella resurfacing of the originally patella unresurfaced knee. This is supported by a recent study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) that suggested that surgeons may be more inclined to revise a patella non resurfaced implant knee with a secondary patella resurfacing if the patient presents later with knee pain, given that the option is still available (Clements et al. 2010)Few studies have compared survival of different prosthesis brands and implant designs, but a previous study (Furnes et al. 2002) from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) did not find any statistically significant short-term differences in revision rates between the most commonly used brands in Norway. Other national arthroplasty registers with longer follow-up have reported statistically significant differences between some commonly used brands in their annual reports (Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2009, The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2009).Based on data in the NAR, we compared overall survival of cemented knee prostheses with and without resurfacing of the patella, and assessed the survival of some widely used TKA brands.     

Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty

Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have begun to emerge as a major cause of failure. In an effort to understand some of the mechanical factors that might contribute to patellar component failure, a biomechanical study was performed. Quadriceps force and anterior patellar strain were measured during dynamic flexion in 10 fresh, paired human cadaver knee joints. First, tests were performed in the intact knee, followed by either posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention or sacrifice of TKA without patellar resurfacing. Tests were then performed following patellar resurfacing with an overly thick, optimum and thin, bony patella. Patellar strain increased in each specimen (with flexion angles of up to 80 degrees), was most pronounced as the bony patella became thinner, was closest to the intact knee when the patella was not resurfaced, and was unaffected by PCL retention or sacrifice. Patellar osteotomy, resulting in a bony patellar thickness of less than 15 mm, resulted in significantly increased strain. TKA systems should include instrumentation that allows precise restoration of overall patellar thickness while maintaining a bony patellar thickness of at least 15 mm.     

Novel customized template designing for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Due to the irregular shape of patella and difficulty in identifying its bony landmarks, it can be a challenge for surgeons to accurately and symmetrically perform patellar resurfacing. Three‐dimensional (3D) models of 20 patellae were generated from computed tomographic images. Using a computer‐assisted preoperative planning technique, customized template designs were developed to guide patellar resurfacing. The patellar models and corresponding templates were produced through rapid prototyping. The accuracy of this technique was assessed after applying the templates on patellar models and cadaver specimens, respectively. Using preoperative planning and predesigned templates, a significant improvement in symmetric patellar resurfacing, with a mean angle of 1.21° mediolateral (ML) obliquity and 1.95° superoinferior (SI) obliquity, was observed compared with the conventional sawguide technique (mean angle of ML and SI was 4.13°, 4.95°, respectively). Additionally, the use of customized templates reproduced the desired preplanned patellar resection. Preoperative planning with 3D imaging and customized templates improved the accuracy of patellar resurfacing in terms of the obliquity and thickness. Clinical Relevance: A novel customized template designed for patellar resectioning will benefit surgeons in performing patellar resurfacing. This technique will provide accurate patellar resurfacing in clinical practice. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1798–1803, 2016.