Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: the effect on postoperative outcomes

Background. Endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) has been promoted as a possible solution to the wound complications, incisional pain, and prolonged convalesce associated with open vein harvesting (OVH). The purpose of this study was to objectively compare the two techniques.

Methods. One hundred patients were prospectively randomized to EVH or OVH. Primary outcomes were wound complications, pain (Medical Outcomes Study Pain Survey), and general health (SF-12). Secondary outcomes were operative times and patient preferences. Patients were assessed at hospital discharge, 3, and 6 weeks postdischarge.

Results. No significant differences were detected in the primary outcomes: leg infection (p = 0.75), incisional pain (p = 0.74), physical health (p = 0.84), mental health (p = 0.47), and postoperative length of stay (p = 0.74). However, patient preference for EVH was highly significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusions. EVH does not demonstrate significant differences compared with OVH. This, coupled with higher operating room costs, should limit its use until clinical benefit is shown. However, strong patient preference and demand for EVH overshadow equivocal clinical outcomes.     

Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison

BACKGROUND: Vein trauma after saphenectomy by endoscopic or longitudinal techniques may influence the progression of medial and intimal hyperplasia and ultimately affect graft patency. This study compared the histologic characteristics of saphenous veins after endoscopic and longitudinal harvest. METHODS: One hundred seventy patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting had saphenectomy performed endoscopically (n = 88) or by a longitudinal incision (n = 82). Cross-sectional specimens from endoscopically (n = 151) and longitudinally (n = 158) harvested veins were submitted for hematoxylin-eosin, trichrome, and elastin staining. Blinded histologic evaluation involved graded analysis of endothelial, smooth muscle, and elastic lamina continuity in addition to medial and adventitial connective tissue uniformity. RESULTS: Regardless of harvest technique, endothelial, elastic lamina, and smooth muscle continuity as well as medial and adventitial connective tissue uniformity were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Minor histologic alterations occur during saphenectomy, however, endoscopically and longitudinally harvested saphenous veins are histologically similar.     

Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft

BACKGROUND: Although the use of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in coronary artery bypass grafting is accepted, few studies have documented the implementation of EVH in peripheral vascular disease surgery. We hypothesized that EVH improves outcomes compared with open vein harvest (OVH) in patients undergoing femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery. METHODS: The charts of 144 consecutive patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery over the course of 27 months were reviewed. A femoral to below the knee arterial bypass with saphenous vein was done in 88 patients (29 had EVH, 59 had OVH). The preoperative characteristics evaluated were age, gender, renal function, history of diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and previous infrainguinal bypass surgery on the affected side. End points included wound complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, angiographic and operative interventions for graft occlusion, patency rates, limb salvage, acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, and death. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and demographics were similar in the EVH and OVH groups. No operative intervention for occlusion was required in the EVH group (0/29) compared with 13.4% in the OVH group (8/59) (P = .03). At the mean follow-up time of 21 months, primary patency rate was 92.8% in the EVH group and 80.6% in the OVH group (P = .12). No significant differences were found between the EVH and OVH groups in postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, patency rates, limb salvage, and death. CONCLUSION: Despite our initial concerns of damaging the venous conduit with a minimally invasive approach to saphenous vein harvest, EVH in our experience has resulted in a trend toward improved patency rates and decreased infectious wound complications while affording the benefit of improved cosmesis. An endoscopic approach results in smaller incisions, decreased interventions for occlusion, and improved outcomes compared with OVH. EVH is the procedure of choice for harvesting saphenous vein for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery.     

Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations

BACKGROUND: Although long saphenous vein remains the most commonly used conduit in coronary revascularization, traditional open vein harvest (OVH) may lead to significantly impaired wound healing and postoperative pain. Endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) attempts to reduce this morbidity and improve patient satisfaction with no compromise in outcome. METHODS: From September 2000 to November 2001, 108 saphenous vein harvests were prospectively randomly assigned to EVH (n = 52) or OVH (n = 56); EVH was performed with the Clearglide endoscopic vein harvest system (Cardiovations) by a single surgeon. Endpoints included impaired wound healing (ASEPSIS score), operative and harvest time, vein quality (including histology), outcome and postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale). Follow-up was as long as 3 years. RESULTS: The groups were well matched demographically. Endoscopic vein harvest was quicker to perform if sufficient vein for two grafts was needed (p < 0.01). Wound healing was significantly impaired (ASEPSIS score) in the OVH group compared with the EVH group (p < 0.01). The new procedure did not prolong the overall operative time (p = 0.77). Postoperative pain was less (p < 0.01) in the EVH group. Stepwise multiple regression showed age, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, total operative time, type of procedure, length of incision, and number of vein grafts to be predictive of impaired wound healing. More late interventions were needed in the OVH group for wound-related morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that endoscopic vein harvest results in fewer cases of impaired wound healing and reduced postoperative pain, and it does not prolong the operative time significantly nor compromise the vein quality. Furthermore, it is quicker to perform if two grafts are needed, and it reduces late interventions.     

Major leg wound complications after saphenous vein harvest for coronary revascularization

BACKGROUND: Major leg wound complications after coronary artery bypass graft procedures are infrequent and few are reported in the literature. We present our experience in treating 23 patients with major leg wound complications after coronary revascularization procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 3,525 bypass procedures with saphenous vein grafts performed over a 10-year period was conducted. Ten potential risk factors for those who developed major leg wound complications were analyzed and compared with the entire cohort of patients undergoing similar bypass procedures during the same period. RESULTS: Lower extremity wound complications occurred in 145 patients (4.1%), 23 of whom (0.65%) required additional surgical interventions (62 total). There were 32 wound debridements, 8 skin grafts, 11 vascular procedures, 5 amputations, 3 fasciotomies, 2 free tissue transfers, and 1 fasciocutaneous flap. Of ten variables evaluated by multivariate analysis, female gender, peripheral vascular disease, and postoperative intraaortic balloon pump use were identified as significant independent predictors of major leg wound complications (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The causes of major leg wound complications after saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass graft procedures are multifactorial. To minimize these complications, we recommend vascular evaluations before saphenous vein harvest, attention to proper surgical technique, and careful harvest site selection.     

Treatment of a nonhealing saphenous vein harvest graft with treprostinil sodium

Impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest sites is a serious but under-recognized complication of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, particularly in the presence of peripheral arterial disease. We report the use of a continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil sodium, an analog of prostacyclin, to treat a limb-threatening, nonhealing saphenous vein harvest incision site after myocardial revascularization.     

Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality.

BACKGROUND: The saphenous vein is an important conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Wound complications from traditional open vein harvesting occur often. Minimally invasive endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting may decrease wound complications. Vein quality may be an issue with endoscopic harvesting. METHODS: We reviewed 568 patients who had bypass grafting and saphenous vein harvesting either endoscopic (group A, n = 180) versus open (group B, n = 388). Both groups were demographically similar and management identical. Wound complication was defined by the need for intervention and included lymphocele, hematoma, cellulitis, edema, eschar, and infection. Multiple vein segments were obtained from 8 patients, 4 from each group, and examined histologically. RESULTS: Wound complications were significantly less in group A (9/180, 5%) versus group B (55/388, 14.2%), p value equal to or less than 0.001. Open harvesting (p< or =0.001), diabetes (p< or =0.001), and obesity (p< or =0.02) were risk factors for wound complication by univariate analysis. By multiple logistic analysis, open harvesting (p< or = 0.0007) and diabetes (p< or =0.0001) were independent risk factors for wound infection. Histologic evaluation of vein samples showed that there was no difference between the groups and vascular structural integrity was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting was associated with fewer wound complications and infections. Vein quality was not adversely effected because of endoscopic harvesting.     

Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting (EVH) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been developed to reduce leg wound morbidity and improve patient satisfaction. Choosing between EVH of a short vein segment from the thigh and open venous harvesting (OVH) of a short segment from the calf represents a clinical dilemma as EVH is easiest to perform from the thigh and OVH is easiest to perform from the calf. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether leg wound morbidity was reduced after EVH of a short vein segment from the thigh compared with OVH from the calf. Secondly we investigated whether EVH would reduce length of hospital stay and improve cosmetic results. METHODS: From April 2004 to June 2007, 132 patients undergoing elective isolated CABG were randomized to have a short segment of saphenous vein harvested either by the EVH or OVH technique. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at day 5 and at 1 month. Primary end-points included wound morbidity. Secondary end-points included harvest time, length of hospital stay, cosmetic results and need for additional wound care after discharge. RESULTS: The groups were preoperative similar. Three patients in the OVH group were excluded from the study as it became apparent that it was necessary to extend the incision beyond the knee. Harvest time was longer for the EVH group, but these patients suffered from significantly fewer cases of infectious and non-infective wound complications, with a substantial reduction in the need for post-discharge leg wound care. The purulent infection rates in the EVH and OVH groups were 0% and 11%, respectively. The overall leg wound morbidity rates regarding cellulitis, purulent infection, dehiscence and skin necrosis were 3% and 27% in the EVH and OVH groups, respectively (p<0.001). The length of hospital stay was similar. The conversion rate from EVH to OVH was 14%. The EVH group experienced less pain and better cosmetic results. CONCLUSIONS: EVH of a short vein segment from the thigh results in less wound morbidity and better cosmetic results compared with OVH of a short vein segment from the calf.     

Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest decreases leg wound complication in coronary artery bypass grafting patients

A bstract Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common procedure performed in adult cardiovascular surgery. The most frequently used conduit is the greater saphenous vein. Using traditional methods, the complication rate of the leg is relatively high (up to 24%). To decrease the complication rate, we used the Endo-Path to harvest the greater saphenous vein. Methods and Results: From May 1997 through March 1999, a total of 135 patients received the CABG operation. We excluded the patients who died immediately postoperatively or had concomitant surgical procedures. Sixty patients received the endoscopic saphenous vein harvest procedure (group A), while another 59 patients (group B) did not. No important differences were noted between the two groups in respect to the number of distal anastomoses, length of harvested vein, total surgical time, and length of ICU stay. However, the leg wound complication rate decreased from 20.3% to 5.0% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the long-term patency rate needs time to be proven, the endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvest method is an attractive and effective method.     

Occlusive wrap dressing reduces infection rate in saphenous vein harvest site

BACKGROUND: Infection in the saphenous vein harvest site is a common problem. We developed an occlusive circumferential wrap dressing technique that reduces skin edge tension, eliminates dead space, and prevents external contamination. We compared the surgical site infection rate using the wrap dressing technique with that of standard longitudinal dressings. METHODS. One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard dressings or the wrap dressing. Data were collected in the hospital and then 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. Superficial and deep wound infections were defined by the standard criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESULTS: The infection rate in the wrap group was 14% compared with 35%, for the standard group (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that wrap technique was the only significant predictor (negative) of infection (odds ratio, 0.19; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In saphenous vein harvest wounds, the occlusive wrap dressing technique has the potential to reduce the rate of infection by 50%. This simple and inexpensive technique is also readily applicable to the radial artery harvest site in the arm and may provide similar benefit.     

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases

Background Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein is a relatively new technique developed to minimize the wound and postoperative complications. This technique has gained patients’ acceptance and become popular in cardiac surgical practices. Because most centers have limited experience with this approach, the authors summarize the clinical profiles of patients undergoing endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH). Methods Between March 2001 and August 2006, 1,348 patients (945 men and 403 women) with a mean age of 67.2 years (range, 28–89 years) underwent EVH of saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral artery reconstruction, and miscellaneous conditions. The EVH technique was performed using the Vasoview system (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA, USA) under the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO₂) insufflation. Results Technical success was achieved in 98.6% of the cases. Two saphenous veins were discarded because of obvious vein injury. The mean harvest time was 45 min: 68 min for the first 50 cases and 23 min for the last 200 cases. Nearly all the patients (98%) had saphenous vein harvested only from the thighs, whereas only 1.5% of the patients had saphenous vein harvested from the legs. Postoperative wound complications were experienced by 61 patients including 25 tract hematomas, 19 wound dehiscences or poor healing, 16 wound infections, and 1 overlying skin necrosis. Overall, 13 subsequent revisions were required for these complications. Detectable air embolisms occurred for 143 patients and numbness in the saphenous nerve territory for 169 patients. Conclusion The findings showed EVH of saphenous vein to be a valid alternative to open saphenectomy, providing excellent surgical results. Therefore, EVH should be considered as the standard of care for saphenous vein harvest.     

Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial-intracranial bypass procedures

BACKGROUND: The introduction of endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) for coronary artery bypass procedures over the past few years has reduced the morbidity and enhanced patient satisfaction associated with this procedure. This report introduces the use of the endoscopic SVG harvest for extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass procedures. METHODS: Endoscopic SVG harvest has been performed in more than 4000 patients at Duke University Medical Center from 1998 to 2003. We have performed 4 such procedures for EC-IC bypass, including 3 for the treatment of large or giant cerebral aneurysms and 1 for symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion. A 2-cm transverse incision is made to harvest 25- to 30-cm segment of SVG using a VasoView graft harvest system (Guidant Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Menlo Park, CA). Skin closure was performed using a 4-0 Vicryl subcuticular stitch. RESULTS: Endoscopic SVG harvest was possible in each of the 4 patients. No graft leaks were visualized microscopically with infusion pressure testing of the graft before graft anastomosis, and no postoperative graft harvest complications (infection, hematoma, dehiscence, etc) were encountered in either the immediate or long-term follow-up (mean, 14 months). CONCLUSIONS: The use of endoscopic SVG harvest presents an attractive alternative to open SVG harvest for EC-IC bypass procedures. A high-quality long graft may be harvested with apparent decreased morbidity via this minimally invasive technique.     

电视内镜下获取大隐静脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用

目的 探讨冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中应用微创电视内镜下获取大隐静脉的手术要点和临床效果.方法 自2001年1月至2008年12月212例患者接受CABG,按照获取大隐静脉的方法分为两组:内镜组72例,传统组140例.比较分析两组患者的手术资料和术后并发症等情况.结果 内镜组获取静脉的时间与传统组比较差异无统计学意...