Present and future in brachytherapy--from the discovery of radium to the 21st century]

Brachytherapy can deliver high doses of radiation to a tumor with only low doses to the normal tissue. Brachytherapy can be classified as intracavitary, intraluminar and interstitial radiotherapy. It can be also divided into three groups according to dose rate: low (LDR), medium (MDR) and high (HDR) dose rates. In recent years, HDR remotely controlled afterloading systems are widespread in Japan. HDR brachytherapy has solved the problem of radiation exposure for medical staff, and patients need not be isolated in highly sealed rooms. Local control rates of T1 and T2 tongue cancer treated with LDR interstitial radiation using 226Ra and 192Ir were 80% and 67%. A phase III trial of HDR versus LDR interstitial brachytherapy for early tongue cancer revealed the same local control rates between the two groups. For uterine cervix cancer, the cause-specific survival rates of patients treated with HDR intracavitary brachytherapy were almost the same as those treated with LDR. HDR brachytherapy can be applied against recurrent tumors. Almost half of recurrent tumors can be controlled with HDR treatment. Brachytherapy is widely used for prostate cancer in the USA. LDR brachytherapy using 125I seeds is used for prostate cancer. In Japan, 125I seeds can not be used because of the regulation of radioisotopes, so we treat prostate cancer patients with HDR brachytherapy. The two-year biochemical NED rate is 83%. Brachytherapy has a long history of nearly 100 years. In recent years, the development of an HDR remotely controlled afterloading system and treatment planning system allows us to make a precise treatment plan and a uniform dose distribution. In the next century, HDR-brachytherapy will continue to play an important role in the field of radiotherapy.     

The emerging role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

By placing radioactive sources directly into the cancer, brachytherapy allows delivery of a highly conformal radiation dose to the prostate. Permanent seed brachytherapy is most commonly used for low-risk cancer, whereas high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is combined with external-beam radiotherapy to treat higher risk disease. The high rate of dose delivery and the large fraction size may be a radiobiological advantage for tumours with high sensitivity to radiation fraction size. The ability to optimise dose delivery allows for exquisite shaping of dose around the prostate and sparing of normal tissues. HDR brachytherapy is most commonly delivered in two or more fractions of 810 Gy combined with 40-50 Gy external beam. Published studies are almost entirely limited to single-institution case series. Most of the patients treated have relatively unfavourable localised disease, with a reported disease-free survival of 68-93%, and a local control rate of over 90%. Treatment is well tolerated, with urethral stricture the most common late effect (risk around 8%). Early results using HDR monotherapy in low-risk disease seem promising. Patients most likely to benefit from a combined HDR/external-beam approach have bulky local disease (stage T2b-T3) or intermediate to high-grade cancers. Prospective multicentre studies of HDR brachytherapy have begun in this patient group in Canada and the USA, which hopefully will allow future comparisons with high-dose conformal external-beam techniques.     

Brachytherapy: Current Status and Future Strategies — Can High Dose Rate Replace Low Dose Rate and External Beam Radiotherapy?

Brachytherapy delivers the most conformal high dose radiotherapy possible to the prostate, using either a low dose rate (LDR) or high dose rate (HDR) technique. It may be used either alone as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as a local boost. Comparative efficacy studies, including one randomised controlled trial, consistently show higher cancer control rates when brachytherapy is used compared with EBRT alone, with even some evidence of improvement in survival. There are now extensive mature data supporting the use of LDR as monotherapy for patients with low-risk and selected intermediate-risk disease, with most series reporting long-term disease control rates of over 90% after high-quality implants. HDR is most commonly combined with EBRT to treat intermediate- and high-risk disease, with disease control rates of over 90% reported. The low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer combined and the ability to optimally sculpt dose distribution provides the biological and dosimetric rationale for HDR. HDR enables more consistent implant quality than LDR, with evidence of lower acute and late toxicity. Many dose and fractionation schedules of HDR in combination with EBRT have been investigated, but a single fraction of 10–15 Gy is commonly combined with EBRT to a dose of 40–50 Gy to treat intermediate- and high-risk disease. High disease control rates are also reported with HDR as monotherapy, particularly in patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease. Although older series have delivered four to six fractions of HDR, there is growing evidence to support the delivery of HDR in three or even two fractions. Single-fraction HDR monotherapy is now being investigated and if early data are confirmed with longer follow-up, may well become the treatment of choice for many men with localised prostate cancer.     

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE: Several investigations have revealed that the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer is atypically low, and that hypofractionation or high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens using appropriate radiation doses may be expected to yield tumor control and late sequelae rates that are better or at least as favorable as those achieved with conventional radiation therapy. In this setting, we attempted treating localized prostate cancer patients with HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using this approach, with special emphasis on the relationship between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral dose calculated from the dose-volume histogram (DVH) of HDR brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 2000 and December 2003, 70 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated by iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at the Gunma University Hospital. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered in fraction doses of 3 Gy, three times per week; a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and the seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided HDR brachytherapy. The fraction size and the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy were prospectively changed, whereas the total radiation dose for EBRT was fixed at 51 Gy. The fractionation in HDR brachytherapy was as follows: 5 Gy x 5, 7 Gy x 3, 9 Gy x 2, administered twice per day, although the biologic effective dose (BED) for HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT, assuming that the alpha/beta ratio is 3, was almost equal to 138 in each fractionation group. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The number of patients in each fractionation group was as follows: 13 in the 5-Gy group; 19 in the 7-Gy group, and 38 in the 9-Gy group. The tumor stage was T1 in 10 patients, T2 in 36 patients, and T3 in 24 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 11 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 25 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 14 months (range 3-42 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria. RESULTS: The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 39 patients (56%), and Grade 2-4, 31 patients (44%). One patient who developed acute urinary obstruction was classified as having Grade 4 toxicity. Comparison of the distribution of the grade of acute GU toxicity among the different fractionation groups revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was evaluated using the following DVH parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. The V30-110 values in the patients with Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the V120-150 values between patients with Grade 0-1 and Grade 2-4 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted for the radiation therapy, patients with 11 needles or less showed a significantly higher incidence of Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity compared with those with 12 needles or more (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. Increase in the fraction dose or reduction in the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy did not affect the severity of acute GU toxicity, and the volume of urethra receiving an equal or lower radiation dose than the prescribed dose was more closely associated with the grade severity of acute GU toxicity than that receiving a higher than the prescribed dose.     

High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in High-Risk Localised Disease – Why Do Anything Else?

The management of high-risk prostate cancer is challenging, as patients have a high risk of both local and distant relapse. Although adjuvant systemic treatment remains an important component of management, for those receiving radiotherapy, optimal local treatment should include a brachytherapy boost. This may be given by low dose rate (LDR) or high dose rate (HDR) techniques, but HDR has several advantages over LDR by virtue of more consistent dose optimisation, ability to treat outside the prostate and lower toxicity. A significant body of evidence now supports the use of HDR brachytherapy in addition to supplementary pelvic external beam radiotherapy for men with high-risk disease. Consistent evidence has emerged from randomised clinical trials, meta-analyses, and from institutional and multicentre cohort studies. It has been shown to improve local disease control and possibly reduce metastases and improve cancer-specific survival compared with external beam radiotherapy alone. It should be considered as standard treatment.     

Phase III trial of high and low dose rate interstitial radiotherapy for early oral tongue cancer

: Oral tongue carcinomas are highly curable with radiotherapy. In the past, patients with tongue carcinoma have usually been treated with low dose rate (LDR) interstitial radiation. This Phase III study was designed to compare the treatment results obtained with LDR with those obtained with high dose rate (HDR) interstitial radiotherapy for tongue carcinoma.

: The criteria for patient selection for the Phase III study were: (a) presence of a T1T2N0 tumor that could be treated with single-plane implantation, (b) localization of tumor at the lateral tongue border, (c) tumor thickness of 10 mm or less, (d) performance status between O and 3, and (e) absence of any severe concurrent disease. From April 1992 through December 1993, 15 patients in the LDR group (70 Gy/4 to 9 days) and 14 patients in the HDR group (60 Gy/10 fractions/6 days) were accrued. The time interval between two fractions of the HDR brachytherapy was more than 6 h.

: Local recurrence occurred in two patients treated with LDR brachytherapy but in none of the patients treated with HDR. One- and 2-year local control rates for patients in the LDR group were both 86%, compared with 100% in the HDR group (p = 0.157). There were four patients with nodal metastasis in the LDR group and three in the HDR group. Local recurrence occurred in two of the four patients with nodal metastases in the LDR group. One- and 2-year nodal control rates for patients in LDR group are were 85, compared with 79% in the HDR group.

: HDR fractionated interstitial brachytherapy can be an alternative to traditional LDR brachytherapy for early tongue cancer and eliminate the radiation exposure for medical staffs.     

Current controversies in high-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer

The use of brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer has increased worldwide since its initial introduction over 100 years ago. However, certain aspects of the use of high-dose-rate (HDR) versus low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy continue to be controversial, particularly the role of HDR in FIGO Stage III cervical cancer and the use of HDR with concurrent chemotherapy. This study represents a systematic literature review of prospective and retrospective series of patients with cervical carcinoma treated with external-beam radiation (EBRT) followed by either HDR or LDR radiation. The local control rates, survival rates, and treatment-related complications in patients with Stage III cervical cancer treated with HDR or LDR and those treated with concomitant chemotherapy are examined. Patients with Stage III cervical cancer treated with EBRT and brachytherapy have a local control rate of >50% in most series. Randomized prospective and retrospective studies show overall statistically equivalent local control, overall survival, and complication rates between HDR and LDR. However, LDR may be preferable for large, bulky tumors at the time of brachytherapy. Retrospective studies of HDR and concurrent chemotherapy are limited but have demonstrated toxicity rates similar to those with LDR. Selected patients with Stage III cervical carcinoma who have an adequate response to EBRT and concomitant chemotherapy may be treated with HDR brachytherapy. The existing literature shows no significant increase in complications in patients treated with HDR and concurrent chemotherapy; however, sufficient tumor shrinkage prior to HDR and careful monitoring of the dose to the normal tissues are imperative.     

High Dose Rate versus Low Dose Rate Interstitial Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Floor of Mouth

Purpose: Patients with cancer of the floor of mouth are treated with radiation because of functional and cosmetic reasons. We evaluate the treatment results of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) interstitial radiation for cancer of the floor of mouth.Methods and Materials: From January 1980 through March 1996, 41 patients with cancer of the floor of mouth were treated with LDR interstitial radiation using ¹⁹⁸Au grains, and from April 1992 through March 1996 16 patients with HDR interstitial radiation. There were 26 T1 tumors, 30 T2 tumors, and 1 T3 tumor. For 21 patients treated with interstitial radiation alone, a total radiation dose of interstitial therapy was 60 Gy/10 fractions/6–7 days in HDR and 85 Gy within 1 week in LDR. For 36 patients treated with a combination therapy, a total dose of 30 to 40 Gy of external radiation and a total dose of 48 Gy/8 fractions/5–6 days in HDR or 65 Gy within 1 week in LDR were delivered.Results: Two- and 5-year local control rates of patients treated with HDR interstitial radiation were 94% and 94%, and those with LDR were 75% and 69%, respectively. Local control rate of patients treated with HDR brachytherapy was slightly higher than that with ¹⁹⁸Au grains (p = 0.113). For late complication, bone exposure or ulcer occurred in 6 of 16 (38%) patients treated with HDR and 13 of 41 (32%) patients treated with LDR.Conclusion: HDR fractionated interstitial brachytherapy can be an alternative to LDR brachytherapy for cancer of the floor of mouth and eliminate radiation exposure for the medical staff.     

Results and complications of high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: Cerrahpa?a experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results and complications of treatment with high dose rate (HDR) compared to low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy patients who were treated with external irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy and followed for more than 2 years between 1978 and 1998 have been recently updated. The low dose rate group consisted of 77 cases treated between 1978 and 1982 and HDR group consisted of 293 cases treated between 1982 and 1998. All patients first received external irradiation with 60Co or 9-18 MV photons and a median dose of 54 Gy was given in 6 weeks. In the LDR group, intracavitary treatment was given with Manchester applicators loaded with radium (30 mg) in an intrauterine tube and 20 mg in vaginal ovoids. The dose delivered to point A was on average 32 Gy in one application. In the HDR group, a total dose of 24 Gy was given to point A in three insertions 1 week apart. The dose rate was 0.62 Gy at point A. RESULTS: The 5-year pelvic control rate was found to be 73% in the HDR group, compared with 86% in the radium group for stage I cases. In stage IIB and IIIB cases, the rates were 68% and 45% for HDR and 65% and 53% for LDR, respectively. In all stages, there was no statistical difference in pelvic control and survival rates between the two groups. Overall incidence of late complications was found as 31.1% and 31.9% in HDR and LDR groups, respectively. The grade 2-4 late complication rate was 14% in the HDR group compared to 19% in the LDR group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: HDR brachytherapy in the management of the cervix appears to be a safe and efficacious approach. Pelvic control, survival and complications rates are quite similar when compared with LDR.     

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Second analysis to determine the correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE: We have been treating localized prostate cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at our institution. We recently reported the existence of a correlation between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral radiation dose in HDR brachytherapy by using different fractionation schema. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the urethral dose in the development of acute GU toxicity more closely than in previous studies. For this purpose, we conducted an analysis of patients who had undergone HDR brachytherapy with a fixed fractionation schema combined with hypofractionated EBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among the patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated by 192-iridium HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at Gunma University Hospital between August 2000 and November 2004, we analyzed 67 patients who were treated by HDR brachytherapy with the fractionation schema of 9 Gy x two times combined with hypofractionated EBRT. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered at a fraction dose of 3 Gy three times weekly, and a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography-guided HDR brachytherapy. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with a 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The tumor stage was T1c in 13 patients, T2 in 31 patients, and T3 in 23 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 12 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 21 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range 3-24 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria. RESULTS: The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in the urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 42 patients (63%); Grade 2-3, 25 patients (37%). The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was determined using the following dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. In addition, the D5 (dose covering 5% of the urethral volume), D10, D20, and D50 of the urethra were also estimated. The V30-V150 values in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. The D10 and D20, but not D5 and D50, values were also significantly higher in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity than in those with Grade 0-1 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted, there was no correlation between the number of needles implanted and the severity of acute GU toxicity or the V30-V150 values and D5-D50 values. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer, when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. However, because the urethral dose was closely associated with the grade of severity of the acute GU toxicity, the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy must be kept low to reduce the severity of acute GU toxicity.     

Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma

Purpose: To investigate whether current fractionation and brachytherapy protraction schemes for the treatment of prostatic cancer with radiation are optimal, or could be improved.

Methods and Materials: We analyzed two mature data sets on radiotherapeutic tumor control for prostate cancer, one using EBRT and the other permanent seed implants, to extract the sensitivity to changes in fractionation of prostatic tumors. The standard linear-quadratic model was used for the analysis.

Results: Prostatic cancers appear significantly more sensitive to changes in fractionation than most other cancers. The estimated /β value is 1.5 Gy [0.8, 2.2]. This result is not too surprising as there is a documented relationship between cellular proliferative status and sensitivity to changes in fractionation, and prostatic tumors contain exceptionally low proportions of proliferating cells.

Conclusions: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy would be a highly appropriate modality for treating prostate cancer. Appropriately designed HDR brachytherapy regimens would be expected to be as efficacious as low dose rate, but with added advantages of logistic convenience and more reliable dose distributions. Similarly, external beam treatments for prostate cancer can be designed using larger doses per fraction; appropriately designed hypofractionation schemes would be expected to maintain current levels of tumor control and late sequelae, but with reduced acute morbidity, together with the logistic and financial advantages of fewer numbers of fractions.     

Lack of benefit from a short course of androgen deprivation for unfavorable prostate cancer patients treated with an accelerated hypofractionated regime

PURPOSE: High-dose radiotherapy, delivered in an accelerated hypofractionated course, was utilized to treat prostate cancer. Therapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided conformally modulated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is (1) to assess long-term comparative outcomes from three trials using similar accelerated hypofractionated regimes; and (2) to examine the long-term survival impact of a short course of < or =6 months adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation when a very high radiation dose was delivered. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2000, 1,260 patients were treated at three institutions with pelvic EBRT (36-50 Gy) integrated with HDR prostate brachytherapy. The total dose including brachytherapy was given over 5 weeks. The biologic equivalent EBRT dose ranged between 90 and 123 Gy (median, 102 Gy) using an alpha /beta of 1.2. Patient eligibility criteria included a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or =10, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical stage > or =T2b. A total of 1,260 patients were treated, and 934 meet the criteria. Kiel University Hospital treated 198 patients; William Beaumont Hospital, 315; and California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, 459 patients. Brachytherapy dose regimes were somewhat different between centers and the dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 Gy x 2 Gy. Patients were divided for analysis between the 406 who received up to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and the 528 patients who did not. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 18 months (3 times the exposure to androgen deprivation therapy). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 1.5-14.5); 4 years for androgen deprivation therapy patients and 4.9 for radiation alone. There was no difference at 5 and 8 years in overall survival, cause-specific survival, or biochemical control among the three institutions. The corresponding 8-year rates with and without androgen deprivation therapy were biochemical control 85% and 81%; overall survival 83% and 78%; cause-specific survival 89% and 94%; and metastatic rates of 16.6% and 7.3%. A multivariate analysis revealed androgen deprivation therapy did not predict for biochemical failure for either the entire group or the subset of 177 patients harboring all three poor prognostic factors. Moreover, adding androgen deprivation therapy strongly correlated with higher rates of both metastasis (p = 0.09; hazard ratio, 2.08) and cancer-related deaths (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 3.25). These negative results for the most unfavorable group led us to question if androgen deprivation therapy might have a deleterious impact through delay in delivery of the potentially curative radiation or whether there may be a biologic basis by fixing the cycling cells in G0. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated pelvic EBRT integrated with TRUS-guided conformally modulated HDR administered to 1,260 patients in three institutions was an excellent method of delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate in 5 weeks. Similar high overall, cause-specific, and biochemical no evidence of disease survival rates achieved show that prostate HDR can be successfully delivered in academic and community settings. At 8 years, the addition of a course of < or =6 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy to a very high radiation dose did not confer a therapeutic advantage but added side effects and cost. Furthermore, for the most unfavorable group, there was a higher rate of distant metastasis and more prostate cancer-related deaths. We question the value of a short course of androgen deprivation therapy when used with high-dose radiation.     

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer

This review article aims to overview modern prostate brachytherapy in Japan. Permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy with I-125 started in September, 2003 in Japan. Brachytherapy has several advantages: the dose is adapted precisely to the tumor shape and size, and the long-lived isotope gives a higher tumor dose with less damage to normal tissue; less-time consuming for patients and staff: long-term results comparable to surgery or external beam series in the USA; and quality of life after brachytherapy also appealing. These advantages have brought about increasing use in Japan as well. Patients with a high probability of organ-confined disease and a low-risk group are appropriately treated with brachytherapy. Brachytherapy candidates with a significant risk of extraprostatic extension should be treated with supplemental external beam radiation therapy. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with Ir-192 has preceded seed implants in Japan. HDR has some theoretical advantages. Long-term results of brachytherapy in the USA are comparable with surgery or external beam irradiation so far. We should develop more sophisticated brachytherapy techniques in Japan.     

Role of high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients has started in the late eighties in Europe and the United States, as a boost combined with external beam radiation therapy, as an attractive method for dose escalation. The results of the first dose-escalation study performed at William Beaumont Hospital has established the safety and efficacy of this combined treatment approach. Likewise, this landmark study enabled a paradigm shift in the radiobiology of prostate cancer, demonstrating that the alpha/beta of prostate cancer was much lower than previously believed to be and therefore the sensitivity of this tumor model to higher-than-conventional doses per fraction led to a dramatic increase of hypofractionated treatment regimens, the object of significant clinical research efforts, currently under way. The excellent toxicity profile and clinical outcome of HDR boost combined treatment prompted investigators to expand HDR brachytherapy indications to low/intermediate prostate cancer patients as the sole treatment modality. The results, toxicity and a brief review of the literature for both HDR boost and HDR monotherapy will be presented.     

3D conformal HDR brachytherapy and external beam irradiation combined with temporary androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment outcome of 3D conformal high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam irradiation (EBRT) combined with temporary androgen deprivation for patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and September 1999 we treated 102 patients with stage T1-3 N0 M0 prostate cancer. Stage T1-2 was found in 71, T3 in 31 patients. Median pretreatment PSA level was 15.3 ng/ml. After ultrasound-guided transrectal implantation of four afterloading needles, CT based 3D brachytherapy planning was performed. All patients received four HDR implants using a reference dose per implant of 5 or 7Gy. Time between each implant was 14 days. After brachytherapy EBRT followed up to 39.6 or 45.0 Gy. All patients received temporary androgen deprivation, starting 2-19 months before brachytherapy, ending 3 months after EBRT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.6 years (range 2.0-4.1 years). Actuarial biochemical control rate was 87% at 2 years and 82% at 3 years. In 14 patients we noted biochemical failure, in five patients clinical failure. Overall survival was 90%, disease specific survival 98.0% at 3 years. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4%, late grade 3 toxicity in 5%. One patient developed a prostatourethral-rectal fistula as late grade 4 toxicity. The conformal quality of 300 HDR implants was analyzed using dose volume histograms. CONCLUSIONS: 3D conformal HDR brachytherapy and EBRT combined with temporary androgen deprivation is an effective treatment modality for prostate cancer with minimal associated toxicity and encouraging biochemical control rates after a median follow-up of 2.6 years.     

Rectal bleeding after high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: impact of rectal dose in high-dose-rate brachytherapy on occurrence of grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with special emphasis on the relationship between the incidence of rectal bleeding and the rectal dose from HDR brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 100 patients who were treated by HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT for > or =12 months were analyzed. The fractionation schema for HDR brachytherapy was prospectively changed, and the total radiation dose for EBRT was fixed at 51 Gy. The distribution of the fractionation schema used in the patients was as follows: 5 Gy x 5 in 13 patients; 7 Gy x 3 in 19 patients; and 9 Gy x 2 in 68 patients. RESULTS: Ten patients (10%) developed Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding. Regarding the correlation with dosimetric factors, no significant differences were found in the average percentage of the entire rectal volume receiving 30%, 50%, 80%, and 90% of the prescribed radiation dose from EBRT between those with bleeding and those without. The average percentage of the entire rectal volume receiving 10%, 30%, 50%, 80%, and 90% of the prescribed radiation dose from HDR brachytherapy in those who developed rectal bleeding was 77.9%, 28.6%, 9.0%, 1.5%, and 0.3%, respectively, and was 69.2%, 22.2%, 6.6%, 0.9%, and 0.4%, respectively, in those without bleeding. The differences in the percentages of the entire rectal volume receiving 10%, 30%, and 50% between those with and without bleeding were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The rectal dose from HDR brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer may have a significant impact on the incidence of Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding.     

Brachytherapy in head and neck cancers]

Experience accumulated over several decades with radiation of Head and Neck tumours by irradiation has demonstrated the need for a high tumour dose to achieve local control. With external beam irradiation alone, it is difficult to spare adjacent normal tissues, resulting in undesirable late effects on the salivary glands, mandible, and muscles of mastication. Interstitial implantation is ideally suited to deliver a high dose limited to the volume of the primary tumor, thus minimizing sequels. A large experience has been accumulated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in treatment of carcinoma of oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx. Recent analysis of large clinical series provided data indicating that modalities of low dose rate brachytherapy should be optimized in treating these tumors for increasing therapeutic ratio. Low dose rate brachytherapy is now challenged by high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy. Preliminary results obtained with these two last modalities are discussed regarding to those of low dose rate brachytherapy.     

Current results of brachytherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Perioperative brachytherapy results in a better local control rate than surgery alone for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Brachytherapy enables the delivery of a high radiation dose to a limited volume of tissue, allows the reduction of radiation treatment time, enables direct visualization of the tumor bed and surrounding critical structures, and costs less than external beam radiotherapy. The literature seems to regard the effectiveness of brachytherapy as comparable to that of external beam radiotherapy, and the side effect profile is acceptable. Traditional low-dose-rate brachytherapy methods require extended periods of patient isolation, but recent technologic advances may obviate this necessity. Newer high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy delivery methods allow for the fractionation of radiation delivery and outpatient treatment in some cases. Furthermore, with HDR brachytherapy, the radiation dose distribution can be tailored around critical anatomic structures. Although the application of HDR brachytherapy to soft tissue sarcoma is relatively new, it seems to result in a satisfactory local control rate and may replace traditional low-dose-rate techniques.     

Percutaneous and endobronchial high dose rate brachytherapy for lung cancer

Endobronchial and percutaneous high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was performed with a microSelectron HDR using iridium-192 as a radiation source. As spontaneous pain was uncontrollable by external beam radiation (EBR), chemotherapy, hyperthermia or a combination of these treatment methods, three patients with lung cancer infiltration into the chest wall underwent percutaneous HDR brachytherapy for palliation of severe pain. Selectron needles were inserted under CT guidance and the irradiation dose was set to 10 or 12 Gy at the point 1 cm from the center of the radiation source. A total of 2-4 selectron needles was introduced by means of a template. Irradiation was performed once a week for 1-2 weeks depending on the degree of alleviation of spontaneous pain. In all 3 cases, alleviation of spontaneous pain occured within 7 days after the completion of HDR brachytherapy, and the mean pain score decreased from a value of 2 to 1 within 2 weeks. After discharge from the hospital, the pain score remained between 1-4 in all 3 patients. One problem in percutaneous brachytherapy is the possible hindrance of multiple selectron needle insertion through the template by the ribs depending on the location of the lesion. Six patients aged 51-75 years were subjected to endobronchial HDR brachytherapy. Two of these patients had postoperative recurrence of lung cancer, and 3 patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Brachytherapy was performed 3.4 months (average) after the administartion of 40-70 Gy of EBR. Endobronchial irradiation was performed at a dose of 7 Gy, measured at 1 cm from the center of the radiation source, once a week over a 3 week period for a total of 21 Gy. With the exception of 2 patients who died due to systemic exacerbation, local control of the illness has been good. In endobronchial HDR brachytherapy, it is important to develop a system for altering radiation dose in response to changes in the caliber of the tracheobronchial tree and the degree of the tumor invasion under the bronchial mucosa.