Reliability of the Heparin Management Test for Monitoring High Levels of Unfractionated Heparin: In Vitro Findings in Volunteers versus In Vivo Findings during Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background: The authors assessed the heparin management test in vitro in volunteers and in vivo during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods: In vitro, the heparin management test was analyzed for heparin levels between 0 and 6 IU/ml using variations in hematocrit, platelets, procoagulants, and storage time. The in vivo studies consisted of two groups: In group I (cardiopulmonary bypass <= 90 min, n = 40), anticoagulation was performed according to the activated clotting time (with or without aprotinin); in group II (cardiopulmonary bypass >= 180 min, with aprotinin) included use (n = 10) and nonuse of coumadin (n = 10) and anticoagulation according to the automated heparin dose-response assay. Tests were performed in duplicate (whole blood, two heparin management test analyzers) and compared with anti-Xa activity (plasma).

Results: In vitro, the results of the heparin management test (n = 1,070) correlated well with heparin concentration (r2 = 0.98). Dilution and storage time did not affect the heparin management test; a hematocrit of 60% and reduced procoagulants (10%) prolonged clotting time. In vivo, the correlation (heparin management test vs. anti-Xa) was strong in group I (r2 = 0.97 [with aprotinin] and 0.96 [without aprotinin]; n = 960) and group II without coumadin (r2 = 0.89, n = 516). In group II with coumadin, the overall correlation was r2 = 0.87 and 0.79 (n = 484), although the range varied widely (0.57-0.94, between-analyzer differences 0-47%).     

The plasma supplemented modified activated clotting time for monitoring of heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation

The standard celite or kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) correlates poorly with heparin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared a modified kaolin ACT, in which plasma was supplemented, to a standard undiluted kaolin ACT for monitoring heparin levels during CPB. Fifteen patients undergoing normothermic CPB were enrolled in this prospective study. Heparin management was performed according to the Hepcon HMS results (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The ACTs were performed with the ACT II device (Medtronic). Hepcon HMS calculations, standard kaolin ACTs, and plasma supplemented modified ACTs (mACTs), prepared by diluting blood samples 1:1 with human plasma (Behring, Marburg, Germany), were measured every 30 min during CPB. The data obtained were correlated to the plasma chromogenic anti-Xa activity as a reference assay for heparin levels. A total of 64 samples were evaluated. The chromogenic anti-Xa activity ranged from 0.2 to 5.5 IU/mL. The Hepcon HMS calculations ranged from 2.7-8.2 IU/mL of heparin, the standard ACT ranged from 424 to >999 s, and the mACT ranged from 210 to 801 s. The correlation to the chromogenic anti-Xa method was r = 0.43 for the standard kaolin ACT and r = 0.69 for the plasma mACT. The plasma mACT provided an improved correlation to chromogenically measured levels of anti-Xa activity during CPB. The improved correlation most likely results from a correction of the effects of the impairment of the coagulation system caused by hemodilution and consumption of procoagulants on extracorporeal surfaces. IMPLICATIONS: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the plasma modified kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) provides a better correlation with heparin levels than the standard kaolin ACT.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot.

OBJECTIVE: Kaolin-based activated clotting time assessed by HEMOCHRON (HkACT) is a clinical standard for heparin monitoring alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, aprotinin is known to prolong not only celite-based but also kaolin-based activated clotting time. Overestimation of activated clotting times implies a potential hazardous risk of subtherapeutic heparin anticoagulation. Recently, a novel 'aprotinin-insensitive' activated clotting time test has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer (SaiACT). The aim of our study was to evaluate SaiACT in patients undergoing CPB in presence of heparin and aprotinin. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 44 elective cardiac surgery patients at the following measurement time points: baseline (T0); before CPB after heparinization (T1 and T2); on CPB, before administration of aprotinin (T3); 15, 30, and 60 min on CPB after administration of aprotinin (T4, T5, and T6); after protamine infusion (T7). On each measurement time point, activated clotting time was assessed with HkACT and SaiACT, both in duplicate. Furthermore, the rate of factor Xa inhibition and antithrombin concentration were measured. Statistical analysis was done using Bland and Altman analysis, Pearson's correlation, and ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn correction. RESULTS: Monitoring anticoagulation with SaiACT showed reliable readings. Compared to the established HkACT, SaiACT values were lower at all measurement time points. On CPB but before administration of aprotinin (T3), SaiACT values (mean+/-SD) were 44+/-118 s lower compared to HkACT. However, the difference between the two measurement techniques increased significantly on CPB after aprotinin administration (T4-T6; 89+/-152 s, P=0.032). Correlation of ACT measurements with anti-Xa activity was unchanged for SaiACT before and after aprotinin administration (r2=0.473 and 0.487, respectively; P=0.794), but was lower for HkACT after aprotinin administration (r2=0.481 and 0.361, respectively; P=0.041). On CPB after administration of aprotinin, 96% of all ACT values were classified as therapeutic by HkACT, but only 86% of all values were classified therapeutic if ACT was determined by SaiACT. Test variability was comparable for SaiACT and HkACT. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SaiACT may result in more consistent heparin management that is less affected by aprotinin and a corresponding increase in heparin administration for patients receiving aprotinin.     

Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery using the one-step point-of-care whole blood anti-factor-Xa clotting assay heptest-POC-Hi

The activated clotting time (ACT) generally used for monitoring heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery does not specifically measure heparin anticoagulant activities. This may result in heparin over- or under-dose and subsequent severe adverse events. A new point-of-care whole blood clotting assay (Heptest POC-Hi [HPOCH]) for quantifying heparin anticoagulant activity specifically was compared with ACT and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) heparin plasma levels (Coatest heparin) in 125 patients undergoing CPB surgery. The analytical reliability of the HPOCH and the influence of preanalytical variables on assay results were also examined. The ACT and HPOCH clotting times determined throughout the entire observation period correlated closely (n=683; r = 0.80; p < .0001). Similarly, there was a significant linear correlation between HPOCH and Coatest anti-Xa levels (n=352; r = 0.87; p < .0001). Pre- and post-CBP values of HPOCH, ACT, and anti-Xa plasma levels correlated closely with each other (correlation coefficients between r = 0.90 and r = 0.99; p < .0001). During CPB, there was no significant relationship between ACT and whole blood or plasma heparin levels determined by HPOCH (n=157; r = 0.19) and the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (n=157; r = 0.04), respectively. In contrast, HPOCH and anti-Xa plasma levels correlated strongly during CPB (n=157; r = 0.57; p < .0001). However, bias analysis showed that the HPOCH and Coatest heparin could not be used interchangeably. The HPOCH was well reproducible and not influenced by aprotinin, hemodilution, or other factors affecting ACT. The HPOCH seems to be a promising new tool for specific on-site measurement of heparin activities in whole blood during CPB.     

In vitro effects of aprotinin on activated clotting time measured with different activators.

The effects in vitro of aprotinin on the activated clotting time measured with both celite- and kaolin-activated tubes were investigated in 21 consecutive patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Four whole-blood samples (2 ml per sample) from each patient were tested simultaneously with Hemochron automated timing systems (International Technidyne Corp., Edison, N.J.) before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. One tenth milliliter of either aprotinin (at a final concentration of 80, 120, or 180 KIU/ml) or saline solution was mixed in vitro with blood samples before determination of the activated clotting time. Aprotinin had no inhibitory effect on the activated clotting times of unheparinized blood. After heparin administration, aprotinin in the above concentrations prolonged the activated clotting times measured with celite-activated tubes by 47% to 71%, as compared with the measurements of the activated clotting time without the addition of aprotinin. The activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes were not increased, however, by the in vitro addition of aprotinin. Our in vitro results indicate that aprotinin in concentrations from 80 to 180 KIU/ml does not significantly enhance the inhibitory effects of heparin on the intrinsic coagulation system as evaluated by measurement of the activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes. The anticoagulation effect of heparin in patients receiving aprotinin infusion should be monitored with kaolin-activated instead of celite-activated tubes because the celite makes the measured activated clotting time unreliable in patients receiving aprotinin therapy. These in vitro results require confirmation in vivo in patients receiving aprotinin therapy.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: an in vitro evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using SONOCLOT

The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U x mL(-1)), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU x mL(-1)), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% +/- 37% (2 U x mL(-1)) and 24% +/- 18% (3 U x mL(-1)), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect. IMPLICATIONS: Current standard techniques to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are affected by aprotinin, a drug widely used in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro a new, so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' test from SONOCLOT to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation more reliably in combination with aprotinin.     

Is the kaolin or celite activated clotting time affected by tranexamic acid?

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the activated clotting time is frequently used for determination of anticoagulation, and either Celite or kaolin are used as activators. If aprotinin is administered concomitantly, the Celite activated clotting time (C-ACT) becomes significantly higher than the kaolin activated clotting time (K-ACT). Therefore, insufficient anticoagulation using C-ACT in the presence of aprotinin is a major concern. Whether the application of tranexamic acid (TA), a pharmacologic alternative to aprotinin, has similar effects has not been studied before. METHODS: An in vitro study using the blood of healthy volunteers was performed. Both C-ACT and K-ACT were measured at baseline, after adding TA, and after adding TA and heparin. In addition, 30 patients undergoing primary cardiac operations had simultaneous measurements of C-ACT and K-ACT after skin-incision, 5 minutes after the application of heparin and TA, every 30 minutes during cardiopulmonary bypass, and 10 minutes after the application of protamine. RESULTS: In vitro, C-ACT and K-ACT correlated significantly at each measurement. Tranexamic acid had no influence on the activated clotting time. In vivo, C-ACT and K-ACT did not differ significantly, but at each time C-ACT tended to be greater than K-ACT (p = 0.086). The average difference between K-ACT and C-ACT was stable before and after the application of TA (p = 0.85) but the variability of the differences significantly increased during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of TA does not seem to differentially affect the mean C-ACT and K-ACT. No recommendation seems warranted to prefer one activator over the other in patients receiving TA.     

Monitoring of heparin-induced anticoagulation with kaolin-activated clotting time in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin.

High-dose aprotinin appears to enhance the anticoagulant effects of heparin, as documented by increases in the activated clotting times (ACTs) during cardiopulmonary bypass; hence, some authorities have advocated reducing the dose of heparin in patients treated with aprotinin. An in vitro study by our group suggested that the increase of the ACT in the presence of aprotinin and heparin may be due to the use of celite as surface activator. We compared celite and kaolin as surface activators for the measurement of the ACT in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin and in patients given no aprotinin. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 30 patients, of whom 14 received aprotinin and 16 received a placebo. Before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass, the ACT was measured with two Hemochron 400 systems with 12 mg of either celite (C-ACT) or kaolin (K-ACT) used as surface activator and with one Hepcon HMS system (HR-ACT), which uses kaolin as activator. The latter also was used for measurement of the blood heparin concentration. The ACTs of blood without heparin did not differ between aprotinin and control patients. During anticoagulation with heparin and cardiopulmonary bypass, the average C-ACTs were 784 +/- 301 s (aprotinin) and 496 +/- 120 s (control) (P < .001); the K-ACTs were 502 +/- 131 s (aprotinin) and 458 +/- 101 s (control) (P > .05); the HR-ACTs were 406 +/- 87 s (aprotinin) and 423 +/- 82 s (control) (P > .05), which was consistently less than C-ACT and K-ACT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin on kaolin-based activated clotting time: in vitro comparison of two different point of care devices

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), measurement of kaolin-based activated clotting time (kACT) is a standard practice in monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation. Despite the fact that the kACT test from the Sonoclot Analyzer (SkACT) has been commercially available for several years, no published data on the performance of SkACT are available. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to compare SkACT with an established kACT from Hemochron (HkACT). METHODS: Blood was withdrawn from 25 patients before elective cardiac surgery. SkACT and HkACT were measured in duplicate after in vitro administration of heparin (0, 1, 2 and 3 U/ml), calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution (25% and 50% haemodilution) and aprotinin (200 kIU/ml). RESULTS: A total of 600 duplicate kACT measurements were obtained from 25 cardiac surgery patients. Overall, mean bias +/- SD between SkACT and HkACT was 7 +/- 70 s (1.3% +/- 14.1%). Administration of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin induced a comparable effect on both activated clotting time (ACT) tests. Mean bias ranged from -4 +/- 39 s (-1.7% +/- 12.9%) to 4 +/- 78 s (3.2% +/- 15.6%) for heparinzed blood samples after haemodilution or aprotinin application and increased after combined aprotinin administration and haemodilution. After haemodilution and administration of aprotinin, both ACT tests were less reliable for values >480 s in heparinized blood samples. CONCLUSION: Accuracy and performance of SkACT and HkACT were comparable after in vitro administration of heparin, aprotinin and haemodilution. Both ACT tests were considerably affected by aprotinin and haemodilution.     

Correlation of ACT as measured with three commercially available devices with circulating heparin level during cardiac surgery

Automated activated clotting time (ACT) is utilized as the primary means of assessing anticoagulation status for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures. Influences on the clotting cascade during CPB such as hypothermia, hemodilution, and platelet dysfunction are known to affect ACT. The recently introduced Thrombolytic Assessment System (TAS) has been reported to be less sensitive to changes in hemodilution and hypothermia during CPB than more conventional ACT devices. This study evaluated the ability of TAS, and two other commercially available automated ACT systems, the HemoTec and Hemochron, to correlate with circulating heparin levels. Reference standards for circulating heparin were determined by inactivation of factor Xa assay. Nineteen patients undergoing moderate hypothermic CPB served as subjects for this investigation. Blood samples were obtained for study at four time periods: 1) baseline (control), 2) post heparin administration (300-400 U/kg) prior to CPB, 3) during CPB, and 4) post protamine. Study results demonstrated a high correlation between the HemoTec and Hemochron (r = 0.99), increased heparin dose response on CPB compared to pre-CPB activity (p < 0.05), and a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation between devices and patient hematocrit during CPB. Additionally, device correlation with anti-Xa assay during collection periods 2 and 3 showed negative correlations in each of the three devices evaluated. We conclude that all automated devices tested demonstrated an inability to predict circulating heparin at levels necessary for CPB, and that these discrepancies become magnified during CPB procedures.     

Individualized heparin and protamine management in infants and children undergoing cardiac operations

BACKGROUND: Measurements of activated coagulation time do not correlate with plasma concentration of heparin. This study investigated the effects of a patient-specific method to manage anticoagulation and its reversal in pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Infants and children were randomly assigned to receive either a standard dose of heparin (300 IU/kg; group C, n = 13) or an individualized dose, calculated by an in vitro heparin dose-response test (group HC, n = 13). Protamine dose was based on a 1 mg/l mg ratio of total administered heparin for patients in group C and of the residual heparin concentration in group HC. RESULTS: Administered heparin was significantly higher and total protamine dose was significantly reduced in the HC group (both p < or = 0.001). There was less thrombin generation (p = 0.02) and fibrinolysis (p = 0.05) in group HC. Blood loss and requirement for transfusion of blood and fresh frozen plasma were also lower in group HC (all p < or =0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized management of anticoagulation and its reversal results in less activation of the coagulation cascade, less fibrinolysis, and reduced blood loss and need for transfusions. Further studies are warranted to better define the clinical impact of these findings.     

Effects of Duraflo II heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release in patients with cardiac operation employing aprotinin and steroids

The effects of Duraflo II heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, low-dose aprotinin, and steroids on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release were evaluated by comparing those treated with low-dose aprotinin and steroids. Twenty-four adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or valve repair surgery were randomly assigned to 2 groups: either heparin-coated (Duraflo group, n = 12) or noncoated equipment (noncoated group, n = 12) groups. In the Duraflo group, the cardiopulmonary reservoir was also coated with heparin. There were no significant differences in age at the time of operation, aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and rectal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard systemic heparinization was performed. Methylpredonisolone and low-dose aprotinin were given in both groups of patients. Serum XIIa factor, TAT, and IL-6 were significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.01). Serum IL-8 was significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group at 24 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in serum thrombomodulin and TNF-alpha; both were within normal during the study period. These results indicate that the use of Duraflo II heparin coated equipment and a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary reservoir suppressed excess coagulation and inflammatory reaction induced by cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Hemostatic activation and inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: impact of heparin management

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to fulminant activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system. The authors hypothesized that heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management compared with activated clotting time-based heparin management during CPB leads to more effective attenuation of hemostatic activation and inflammatory response. In a randomized prospective study, the authors compared the influence of anticoagulation with a heparin concentration-based system (Hepcon HMS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) to that of activated clotting time-based management on the activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system during CPB. METHODS: Two hundred elective patients (100 in each group) undergoing standard cardiac surgery in normothermia were enrolled. No antifibrinolytic agents or aprotinin and no heparin-coated CPB systems were used. Samples were collected after administration of the heparin bolus before initiation of CPB and after conclusion of CPB before protamine infusion. RESULTS: There were no differences in the pre-CPB values between both groups. After CPB there were significantly higher concentrations ( < 0.05) for heparin and a significant reduction in thrombin generation (25.2 +/- 21.0 SD vs. 34.6 +/- 25.1), d-dimers (1.94 +/- 1.74 SD vs. 2.58 +/- 2.1 SD), and neutrophil elastase (715.5 +/- 412 SD vs. 856.8 +/- 428 SD), and a trend toward lower beta-thromboglobulin, C5b-9, and soluble P-selectin in the Hepcon HMS group. There were no differences in the post-CPB values for platelet count, adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation, antithrombin III, soluble fibrin, Factor XIIa, or postoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: Compared with heparin management with the activated clotting time, heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management during CPB leads to a significant reduction of thrombin generation, fibrinolysis, and neutrophil activation, whereas there is no difference in the effect on platelet activation. The generation of fibrin even in the presence of high heparin concentrations most likely has to be attributed to the reduced antithrombin III concentrations or reduced inhibition of clot-bound thrombin. Therefore, in addition to maintenance of higher heparin concentrations, monitoring and substitution of antithrombin III should be considered to ensure more efficient antithrombin activity during CPB.     

A reevaluation of heparin requirements for cardiopulmonary bypass

We wished to determine if reduction in the standard heparin administration for cardiopulmonary bypass could be accomplished safely with the use of membrane oxygenators. An experimental study was designed to evaluate two different heparin administration protocols for cardiopulmonary bypass with hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators. Two groups of six pigs were submitted to hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (28 degrees C) for 3 hours, then rewarmed, decannulated, and reassessed after 1 hour. In group I (control) heparin was administered to maintain the activated clotting time in excess of 450 seconds; in group II activated clotting time was maintained between 250 and 300 seconds. The mean total heparin administered was 41,000 units in group I and 25,000 units in group II. Concentration of coagulation factors II, V, and VIII, fibrinogen, and platelet count were determined before, during, and 1 hour after bypass. No significant difference in any of these coagulation parameters was observed between the groups. The performance of the oxygenators was similar in both groups, with no evidence of thrombosis. Thus reduced heparin administration, enough to keep activated clotting time between 250 and 300 seconds, was not related either to major coagulation factors and platelet consumption or to derangements in the oxygenator's performance.     

Heparin dosing and monitoring for cardiopulmonary bypass. A comparison of techniques with measurement of subclinical plasma coagulation

Subclinical plasma coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass has been associated with marked platelet and clotting factor consumption in monkeys. To better define subclinical coagulation in man, we measured plasma fibrinopeptide A concentrations before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were assigned to one of three groups of heparin management: group 1 (n = 10)--initial heparin dose 300 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if the activated coagulation time fell below 400 seconds; group 2 (n = 6)--initial heparin dose 250 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if activated coagulation time was less than 400 seconds; and group 3 (n = 5)--initial heparin dose 350 to 400 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if whole blood heparin concentration was less than or equal to 4.1 IU/ml. Activated coagulation time and heparin concentration were measured every 30 minutes during cardiopulmonary bypass, and fibrinopeptide A was measured at hypothermia, normothermia, and whenever activated coagulation time was less than 400 seconds. Quantitative and qualitative blood clotting competence was assessed after cardiopulmonary bypass, including mediastinal drainage for the first 24 hours. Fibrinopeptide A values were markedly elevated during cardiopulmonary bypass but were well below the levels present before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Fibrinopeptide A correlated inversely with heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass (r = -0.46, p = 0.03), but higher fibrinopeptide A levels during cardiopulmonary bypass did not correlate with post-cardiopulmonary bypass coagulopathy. Group 3 patients received the highest heparin doses (p less than 0.05) and had the greatest postoperative blood loss (p less than 0.05). Protamine dose and heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass correlated best with postoperative mediastinal drainage. Our findings support the following conclusions: (1) compensated subclinical plasma coagulation activity occurs during cardiopulmonary bypass despite activated coagulation time greater than 400 seconds or heparin concentration greater than or equal to 4.1 IU/ml; (2) post-cardiopulmonary bypass mediastinal drainage correlates strongly with increased heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass (p less than 0.05) and protamine dose (p less than 0.05); and (3) during cardiopulmonary bypass at both normothermia and hypothermia, activated coagulation times greater than 350 seconds result in acceptable fibrinopeptide A levels and post-cardiopulmonary bypass blood clotting.     

Increased anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass by aprotinin.

In this prospective study, the effect of the antiproteinase aprotinin on anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass was compared with placebo treatment in a randomized double-blind fashion. The kallikrein-inhibiting capacity was significantly increased in aprotinin-treated patients and decreased in the control patients. The intrinsic clotting system was also inhibited by aprotinin. We demonstrated during cardiopulmonary bypass and in vitro a significantly prolonged activated clotting time and a remarkable prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time by aprotinin at low heparin concentrations, whereas the antithrombin III consumption was significantly reduced. Aprotinin synergistically enhanced the anticoagulation by heparin, which allowed reduced heparinization. This is of clinical importance for use in both heparin-resistant and heparin-sensitive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and may also have advantages for routine use during bypass to reduce the adverse effects of heparin-protamine complexes.     

Diminished anticoagulant response to heparin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Patients are at risk for a diminished anticoagulant response to heparin during coronary artery bypass graft operations. To answer the question of whether preoperative heparin therapy and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation are associated with a diminished response in the period before cardiopulmonary bypass, we observed prospectively the baseline and postheparinization activated clotting times in 76 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft procedures. They included 42 patients who had received preoperative heparin therapy (26 had intra-aortic balloon pumps and 16 did not). Thirty-four comparison patients (controls) were matched for age, sex, race, and heparin lot. Patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy, either with or without intra-aortic balloon pumps, had significantly lower activated clotting times than patients in the control group after a 300 IU/kg dose of porcine intestinal heparin. Total preoperative heparin dose, days of preoperative heparin therapy, and baseline activated clotting times were not predictive of heparin resistance. In conclusion, patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy (with or without intra-aortic balloon pumps) are at increased risk for inadequate heparinization before cardiopulmonary bypass.     

在体外及体外循环中抑肽酶对ACT的影响

选择健康献血员及心内直视手术病，观察抑肽酶对全血活化凝血时间的影响。结果：在体外肝素剂量与ＡＣＴ有显著线性相关。抑肽酶单狡应用并不使ＡＣＴ延，但与肝素合用可协同性延长ＡＣＴ值；在体外循环中抑肽酶延长ＡＣＴ的值更为显著，一般超过８００ｓ。结论：抑肽酶可与肝素协同性延长ＡＣＴ，体外循环中应用抑肽酶时应以ＡＣＴ大于８００ｓ作为肝素抗凝标准。     

Recombinant human antithrombin III restores heparin responsiveness and decreases activation of coagulation in heparin-resistant patients during cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human antithrombin III for restoration of heparin responsiveness in heparin-resistant patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in heparin-resistant patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Patients were considered heparin resistant if the activated clotting time was less than 480 seconds after 400 U/kg heparin. Fifty-two heparin-resistant patients were randomized into 2 cohorts. One cohort received a single bolus (75 U/kg) of recombinant human antithrombin III (n = 28), and the other, the placebo group (n = 24), received a normal saline bolus. If the activated clotting time remained less than 480 seconds, this was defined as treatment failure, and 2 units of fresh frozen plasma were transfused. Patients were monitored for adverse events during hospitalization. RESULTS: Six (21%) of the patients in the recombinant human antithrombin III group received fresh frozen plasma transfusions compared with 22 (92%) of the placebo-treated patients ( P < .001). Two units of fresh frozen plasma did not restore heparin responsiveness. There was no increased incidence of adverse events associated with recombinant human antithrombin III administration. Postoperative 24-hour chest tube bleeding was not different in the 2 groups. Surrogate measures of hemostatic activation suggested that there was less activation of the hemostatic system during cardiopulmonary bypass in the recombinant human antithrombin III group. CONCLUSION: Treatment with recombinant human antithrombin III in a dose of 75 U/kg is effective in restoring heparin responsiveness and promoting therapeutic anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in the majority of heparin-resistant patients. Two units of fresh frozen plasma were insufficient to restore heparin responsiveness. There was no apparent increase in bleeding associated with recombinant human antithrombin III.     

Anticoagulation for cardiac surgery in patients receiving preoperative heparin: use of the high-dose thrombin time

Patients receiving heparin infusions have an attenuated activated clotting time (ACT) response to heparin given for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared patients receiving preoperative heparin (Group H) to those not receiving heparin (REF group) with respect to ACT, high-dose thrombin time (HiTT), and markers of thrombin generation during CPB. Sixty-five consecutive patients (33 Group H, 32 REF group) undergoing elective CPB were evaluated. ACT and HiTT were measured at multiple time points. Plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complex and fibrin monomer were determined at baseline, during CPB, and after protamine administration. Transfusion requirements and postoperative blood loss were measured and compared. ACT values after heparinization increased less in Group H and were significantly lower than those in the REF group (P < 0.01). HiTT values did not differ significantly between the two groups. Blood loss and transfusion requirements were not significantly different between the two groups. Plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and fibrin monomer also did not differ between groups at any time, despite a lower ACT in Group H after heparinization and during CPB. Our data suggest that thrombin formation and activity are not enhanced in patients receiving heparin therapy, despite a diminished ACT response to heparin. The utility of ACT and the threshold values indicative of adequate anticoagulation for CPB are relatively undefined in patients receiving preoperative heparin. HiTT should be investigated as a safe and accurate monitor of anticoagulation for CPB in patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy. Implications: The diminished activated clotting time response to heparin, in patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy, poses difficulties when attempting to provide adequate anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Current data suggest that heparin resistance is not observed when high-dose thrombin time is used to monitor anticoagulation and that a lower activated clotting time value in these patients may be safe.