271株肠球菌属细菌的分布和耐药性分析

目的了解内蒙古鄂尔多斯市中心医院临床分离的肠球菌属细菌的分布情况及对各类抗菌药物的耐药性。方法使用VITEK 2 compact全自动细菌检测分析系统对2010年1月至2013年6月从临床标本中分离的271株肠球菌属细菌进行菌种鉴定和药敏试验,并用WHONET5．6软件对结果进行统计分析。结果271株肠球菌属细菌中,屎肠球菌137株（50．6％）,粪肠球菌80株（29．5％）,其他肠球菌54株（19．9％）。肠球菌属细菌主要分离自尿液69株（25．5％）、脓液40株（14．8o,4）、伤口等分泌物34株（12．5％）。粪肠球菌对万古霉素和利奈唑胺的耐药率分别为1．3％和1．5％;未检出呋喃妥因耐药株;对青霉素和氨苄西林的耐药率较低,分别为11．8％和2．6％;对高浓度庆大霉素和高浓度链霉素的耐药率分别为31．0％和22．9％。屎肠球菌的耐药率明显高于粪肠球菌,对万古霉素的耐药率为4．4％,未检出利奈唑胺耐药株,对呋喃妥因的耐药率为19．1％;对高浓度庆大霉素和高浓度链霉素的耐药率分别为44．8％和26．4％;但对四环素和奎奴普丁一达福普汀的耐药率低于粪肠球菌,分别为58．3％和0。结论屎肠球菌对抗菌药物的耐药率较粪肠球菌高;并已出现对万古霉素耐药株;其耐药性存在地区和菌种间差异,临床治疗应根据细菌药敏结果合理选用抗菌药物。     

In vitro susceptibilities of enterococcal blood culture isolates from the Hamburg area to ten antibiotics

Treatment of enterococcal infections is often difficult because of intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents. Between January 1993 and May 1997, enterococci were isolated from blood cultures of 117 patients at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Eightynine (76%) isolates were phenotypically identified as Enterococcus faecalis, and 24 (21%) as Enterococcus faecium. All E. faecalis isolates, but only 17% of the E. faecium isolates were susceptible to ampicillin. Two E. faecium isolates (8%) but no E. faecalis were vancomycin resistant (vanA genotype). Quinupristin/dalfopristin shows a high degree of susceptiblity of E. faecium (79%) and may be suitable for the therapy of infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant E. faecium strains.     

Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms

BACKGROUND: Enterococci frequently cause biofilm infections but susceptibility of clinical isolates growing in biofilms has not been investigated. The minimum biofilm eradicating concentration (MBEC) has been suggested as a guide to treatment of biofilm infections. We measured an alternative endpoint, the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and compared the results with MIC and MBC. OBJECTIVES: To compare the MIC, MBC and MBIC of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid against enterococcal biofilms, to assess the impact of additional gentamicin and correlate findings with clinical outcome. METHODS: MIC and MBC were measured using standard techniques. MBICs were measured using a modification of the Calgary biofilm device method. Fifty-eight enterococcal isolates from episodes of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection were tested. RESULTS: Tolerance to ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid was seen in 93%, 100% and 93% of isolates, respectively. MIC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid were all 4 mg/L for Enterococcus faecalis isolates. MBC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 1024, >128 and 2048 mg/L, respectively. MBIC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 8192, 4096 and 4096 mg/L, respectively. Results for Enterococcus faecium were similar for vancomycin and linezolid but this species was generally more resistant to ampicillin. Adding 10 mg/L gentamicin had a variable effect on MIC, MBC or MBIC, which was not predictable by gentamicin susceptibility on disc testing. CONCLUSIONS: Very high concentrations of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid are required to inhibit enterococcal biofilms in vitro. Combining these agents with gentamicin significantly reduced MIC, MBC and MBIC against only a proportion of enterococcal isolates. No correlation between MBIC and outcome was found.     

2010年中国CHINET肠球菌属细菌耐药性监测

目的了解2010年中国主要地区临床分离肠球菌属细菌对各类抗菌药物的耐药性。方法国内主要地区14所教学医院(12所综合性医院,2所儿童医院)按统一方案、采用统一的材料、方法(K-B法)和判断标准(CLSI 2010年版)进行肠球菌属细菌的耐药性监测。结果共分离到4 046株非重复肠球菌属细菌,最常见菌种为粪肠球菌1 829株(45.2%)、屎肠球菌1 817株(44.9%)、鹑鸡肠球菌78株(1.9%)、鸟肠球菌54株(1.3%)、铅黄肠球菌49株(1.2%)。肠球菌属对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、替考拉宁仍极敏感,耐药率<4%,万古霉素耐药粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌检出率分别为0.6%、3.6%。粪肠球菌对呋喃妥因、磷霉素和氨苄西林耐药率较低,分别为3.2%、5.7%和11.3%,对高浓度庆大霉素耐药率为44.0%;屎肠球菌耐药性明显高于粪肠球菌,对氨苄西林耐药率接近90%,对高浓度庆大霉素耐药率接近70%,对氯霉素耐药率仅为7.3%,儿童屎肠球菌分离株对磷霉素、呋喃妥因耐药率<10%。不同医院分离的肠球菌属细菌对抗菌药物的耐药率有一定差异。结论屎肠球菌的分离率有增加趋势,肠球菌属细菌对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、替考拉宁依然保持极高的敏感性。     

Susceptibility patterns of enterococci causing infections

Enterococci are among the common organisms associated with hospital-acquired infections. We examined in vitro activities of different antibiotics to 103 enterococcal isolates. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin G, ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, grepafloxacin, trovafloxacin and gemifloxacin were determined by broth microdilution testing method. Among the isolates 71 (69%) were identified as E. faecalis and 32 (31%) as E. faecium. While over 75% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to penicillin and ampicillin, approximately 25% of E. faecalis isolates were resistant to penicillin and ampicillin. None of the E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates were resistant to vancomycin. While 17 (52%) of E. faecium isolates exhibited high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), high level streptomycin resistance (HLSR) was detected in 24 (74%) of the isolates. In contrast, HLGR and HLSR rates for E. faecalis were 14 (20%) and 22 (31%), respectively. Both HLGR and HLSR were detected with higher frequency in ampicillin resistant isolates. Among fluoroquinolones, gemifloxacin and trovafloxacin were the most potent antibiotics tested. There was no increase in MIC90 values of the fluoroquinolones in ampicillin resistant isolates in comparison with ampicillin susceptible isolates. Our data suggest newer fluoroquinolones would be good alternative agents to use especially for combination drug therapy where enterococci with ampicillin resistance and HLAR are prevalent.     

Inhibitory and bactericidal effects of telithromycin (HMR 3647, RU 56647) and five comparative antibiotics, used singly and in combination, against vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci

The inhibitory and bactericidal effects of telithromycin (HMR 3647, RU 66647) were compared with those of gentamicin, ampicillin, erythromycin, azithromycin and vancomycin against 74 strains of enterococci (34 Enterococcus faecalis and 40 Enterococcus faecium) by agar dilution, broth dilution, time kill assays and postantibiotic effect (PAE). The telithromycin MIC(90) for vancomycin-sensitive (VSE) E. faecalis strains tested using the agar dilution method was 8 microg/ml. For a different group of VSE E. faecalis strains tested using the broth dilution method it was 0.06 microg/ml The telithromycin MIC(90)s for vancomycin-resistant (VRE) and VSE E. faecium strains, determined using the agar dilution method, were 4 and 8 microg/ml, respectively, while for a different set of VRE and VSE E. faecium strains tested using the broth macrodilution method, they were 32 and 16 microg/ml, respectively. Telithromycin MBC(90)s for E. faecalis were 4-6 tubes higher and for E. faecium 3-5 tubes higher, respectively, than the MIC(90)s. In time kill assays, telithromycin had bactericidal activity against only 1 of 7 E. faecium strains; for all other E. faecium and E. faecalis strains, only inhibitory activity was demonstrated. Neither synergy nor drug interference was observed when telithromycin was used in combination with ampicillin, vancomycin or gentamicin. At 10 times the MIC, the PAE of telithromycin against E. faecalis was 2.8 h, while for E. faecium it was 1.6 h. Telithromycin should be evaluated for therapy of enterococcal infections, including those caused by VRE organisms. However, because of the strain-to-strain variability in susceptibility to telithromycin, MIC determinations are important, especially for erythromycin-resistant strains.     

儿童患者中肠球菌属临床分离株耐药特征分析

目的了解儿童患者临床分离肠球菌属的耐药特征，指导临床合理用药。方法测定11种抗菌药物对158株肠球菌的MIC，Nithocefin纸片法检测B内酰胺酶，数据用WHONET5．3软件分析处理。结果158株儿童临床分离肠球菌中，粪肠球菌、屎肠球菌、坚韧肠球菌、鸟肠球菌和海氏肠球菌分别占56．3％、39．9％、1．3％、1．3％和1．3％；屎肠球菌对氨苄西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和环丙沙星的耐药率分别为96．8％，95，2％和84．1％，粪肠球菌对上述3种抗菌药的耐药率分别为23．6％，18％和49，4％，屎肠球菌的耐药率明显高于粪肠球菌（P〈20，001）；粪肠球菌出现2株万古霉素MIC为8mg／L的耐药菌，粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对替考拉宁全部敏感。儿童患者中多重耐药肠球菌属菌株占88．6％。结论儿童患者肠球菌属的耐药状况十分严重，尤其屎肠球菌对B内酰胺类、氨基糖苷类和氟喹诺酮类抗菌药耐药率很高。     

2007-2012年浙江萧山医院尿路感染患者的肠球菌分布及耐药性分析

目的 调查从尿路感染患者分离的肠球菌的菌种、临床分布及耐药性,为临床合理选用抗生素提供依据。方法 尿培养采用经典型浸片Uricult,ATB-Expression细菌分析系统进行鉴定和药敏试验;所有资料采用Whonet 5.6软件进行回顾性分析。结果 分离肠球菌238株,主要为粪肠球菌122株（51.3%）和屎肠球菌95株（39.9%）;菌株主要来源列前2位的是内科（38.2%）和泌尿外科（21.0%）;耐药率较高的是红霉素（86.5%）、利福平（75.7%）和四环素（66.4%）;较低的是呋喃妥因（19.7%）、万古霉素（9.6%）和利奈唑胺（0.0%）;粪肠球菌对利福平、红霉素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀和四环素的耐药率较高,均76.5%,万古霉素耐药率0.9%;屎肠球菌对氨苄西林等8种药物耐药率75.8%,万古霉素耐药率4.3%。粪肠球菌对所测试抗生素耐药率仅有四环素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀高于屎肠球菌,其余低于屎肠球菌;利福平、万古霉素和利奈唑胺耐药率在二者间差异无统计学意义。2007年与2012年相比,青霉素、氨苄西林等药物耐药率上升,而环丙沙星、四环素等下降。结论 肠球菌是引起尿路感染的重要病原菌,以粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌为主,不同种类肠球菌耐药率差别较大,加强细菌培养和定期分析其耐药性,有助于提高临床治愈率及合理用药水平。     

In vitro activity of the trinem sanfetrinem (GV104326) against gram-positive organisms.

The in vitro activity of the trinem sanfetrinem (formerly GV104326) (GV) was compared with that of vancomycin, ampicillin, and/or nafcillin against 287 gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multiresistant enterococci, by the agar and microbroth dilution methods. GV demonstrated 2 to 16 times more activity than ampicillin and nafcillin against the majority of these organisms. The MIC range of GV was 16 to 64 micrograms/ml for 19 Enterococcus faecium strains that were highly resistant to ampicillin (ampicillin MIC range, 64 to 512 micrograms/ml) and vancomycin resistant and 0.25 to 32 micrograms/ml for resistant Rhodococcus spp. Similar activities (+/-1 dilution) were observed by either the agar or the broth microdilution method. GV demonstrated bactericidal activity against a beta-lactamase-producing Enterococcus faecalis strain and against two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains in 10(5)-CFU/ml inocula. Synergy between GV and gentamicin was observed against an E. faecalis strain that lacked high-level gentamicin resistance. The activity of GV suggests this compound warrants further study.     

Activity of glycopeptides against vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria.

Gram-positive bacteria resistant to vancomycin are rare; but they include members of the genera Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus, as well as recently emerging vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and several vancomycin derivatives were tested for their activities against vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and E. faecalis were generally cross-resistant to other glycopeptides, but some N-substituted vancomycin derivatives were active against the resistant strains, with MICs of 2 to 32 micrograms/ml. These vancomycin derivatives also had significant levels of activity against intrinsically vancomycin-resistant organisms such as Leuconostoc sp. While vancomycin resistance in E. faecium and E. faecalis was inducible, resistance in members of the genera Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus appeared to be expressed constitutively. Antibody to a vancomycin-induced membrane protein found in membranes of resistant enterococci did not detect a cross-reacting protein in other vancomycin-resistant species.     

Antimicrobial activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with other antibiotics against vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Interactions between quinupristin-dalfopristin and six other antimicrobials were examined by checkerboard arrays against 50 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium selected to represent a range of susceptibilities to individual agents. Unequivocal synergistic or antagonistic interactions at clinically relevant concentrations were infrequently encountered when the streptogramin was combined with chloramphenicol, ampicillin, imipenem, vancomycin, or teicoplanin. Combinations with doxycycline resulted in synergistic inhibition in 36% of checkerboards. Against 10 strains of Enterococcus faecalis, synergistic interactions were found when quinupristin-dalfopristin was combined with doxycycline (four strains), either glycopeptide (three strains), or ampicillin (two strains). Combination with quinupristin-dalfopristin increased the ampicillin MIC from 1 to 4 microg/ml for one strain. For 10 strains of E. faecium, interactions were also assessed by time-kill methods using concentrations of the agents attainable in human serum. Most of these antimicrobials augmented killing by quinupristin-dalfopristin to a minor degree. Against 2 of the 12 strains in this collection that were not highly resistant to gentamicin, the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin (2 microg/ml) plus gentamicin (5 microg/ml) resulted in killing approaching 3 log(10) CFU/ml. With the exception of doxycycline, inhibitory interactions between quinupristin-dalfopristin and other agents tested against vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecium were uncommon at clinically relevant concentrations.     

Inconsistent bactericidal activity of triple-combination therapy with vancomycin, ampicillin, and gentamicin against vancomycin-resistant, highly ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Combination therapy with ampicillin, vancomycin, and gentamicin in vitro against several clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant, highly ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, including VanA and VanB strains, was evaluated. The MICs of ampicillin were not significantly decreased by induction with vancomycin, and the combination of ampicillin and vancomycin was not inhibitory for any strain. Triple-combination therapy was least active against highly resistant VanA isolates, achieving a reduction of less than 1 log CFU at 24 h, but demonstrated slightly more activity against VanB strains.     

Prevalence of resistance to ampicillin,gentamicin and vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from clinical specimens and use of antimicrobials in five Nordic hospitals

We determined the species distribution and prevalence of ampicillin resistance, high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR) and vancomycin resistance among clinical enterococcal isolates from five Nordic laboratories (Bergen, Troms?, Uppsala, Aarhus and Reykjavik). Isolates represented three different groups: (i) all blood culture isolates from 1999; (ii) consecutive in-patient isolates (maximum 40); and (iii) consecutive outpatient isolates (maximum 40) collected during March to May 2000. Antimicrobial use data were collected at the national and hospital level. A high proportion (31.4%) of Enterococcus faecium was detected among blood culture isolates, in contrast to only 4.2% among isolates from outpatients. Ampicillin resistance was not found in Enterococcus faecalis, in contrast to 48.8% in E. faecium isolates. HLGR rates varied considerably between laboratories (1.1-27.6%). Acquired vancomycin resistance was not detected. There were no significant differences in the prevalences of HLGR between in-patient and outpatient isolates at individual hospitals. A cluster of clonally related ampicillin-resistant and HLGR E. faecium isolates was demonstrated in one of the hospitals. The lowest level of hospital antimicrobial use, the lowest proportion of E. faecium and the lowest prevalence of resistance were observed in Reykjavik. The study showed a relatively low level of resistance in enterococci, as compared with most European countries and the USA. However, there were large differences between hospitals with regard to the relative proportion of E. faecium isolates, their susceptibility to ampicillin and gentamicin, as well as the prevalence of HLGR in E. faecalis isolates. This indicates a potential for further improvement of antibiotic policies, and possibly hospital infection control, to maintain the low resistance levels observed in these countries.     

258株肠球菌耐药性分析及耐万古霉素基因检测

目的研究肠球菌的耐药率及耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)的耐药表型和基因型。方法按照美国临床和实验室标准化研究所(CLSI)2009年推荐的微量稀释法进行临床分离肠球菌对各类药物的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)检测,VRE进一步用E-test药敏试验确认;PCR法检测VRE的耐药基因。结果 2010年7月至2011年11月沈阳军区总医院共检出粪肠球菌95株,屎肠球菌163株。粪肠球菌对万古霉素、替考拉宁保持较高敏感度,对氨苄西林、青霉素、呋喃妥因三种抗菌药物敏感度也在65%以上,对其他抗菌药物敏感度低,统计期内未检出耐万古霉素粪肠球菌菌株。屎肠球菌对多数抗菌药物表现为耐药,对氯霉素敏感率为70%,对万古霉素、替考拉宁敏感度下降,为90.7%。期间检出15株VRE,其耐药表型为多重耐药,PCR扩增结果显示,15株万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌VanA基因扩增均为阳性,产物长度在700～1000bp之间,约783bp,符合预期;VanB、VanC引物扩增均阴性。15株万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌对多数抗菌药物耐药,仅对氯霉素、四环素相对敏感,对万古霉素MIC>256mg/L,对替考拉宁也表现为耐药。结论屎肠球菌耐药性高于粪肠球菌,VRE多为多重耐药,给临床治疗带来困难,医院应加强对其预防监测。     

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of enterococci in intensive care units in Sweden evaluated by different MIC breakpoint systems.

Three hundred and twenty-two (322) clinical isolates were collected from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at eight Swedish hospitals between December 1996 and December 1998. Of the isolates, 244 (76%) were Enterococcus faecalis, 74 (23%) were Enterococcus faecium and four (1%) were other Enterococcus spp. MICs of ampicillin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and evernimicin were determined by Etest. Susceptible and resistant isolates were defined according to the species-related MIC breakpoints of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Tentative breakpoints were applied for new/experimental antibiotics. Multidrug resistance among enterococci in ICUs is not uncommon in Sweden, particularly among E. faecium, and includes ampicillin resistance and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Almost 20% of E. faecalis isolates showed high-level resistance to gentamicin and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were only found sporadically. Among the new antimicrobial agents, linezolid and evernimicin showed the best activity against all enterococcal isolates. There was good concordance between the BSAC, NCCLS and SRGA breakpoints in detecting resistance. When applying the SRGA breakpoints for susceptibility, isolates were more frequently interpreted as intermediate. This might indicate earlier detection of emerging resistance using the SRGA breakpoint when the native population is considered susceptible, but with the risk that isolates belonging to the native susceptible population will be incorrectly interpreted as intermediate.     

In vitro activities of antimicrobial cationic peptides; melittin and nisin, alone or in combination with antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria

The In vitro activities of two antimicrobial cationic peptides, melittin and nisin alone and in combination with frequently used antibiotics (daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, ampicillin, and erythromycin), were assessed against clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Using the broth microdilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges of melittin and nisin against all strains were 2-8 μg/ml and 2-32 μg/ml respectively. In combination studies performed with the microdilution checkerboard method using a fractional inhibitory concentration index of ≤ 0.5 as borderline, synergistic interactions occurred more frequently with nisin-ampicillin combination against MSSA and nisin-daptomycin combination against E. faecalis strains. The results of the time-killing curve analysis demonstrated that the concentration dependent rapid bactericidal activity of nisin, and that synergism or early synergism was detected in most strains when nisin or melittin was used in combination with antibiotics even at concentrations of 0.5 × MIC.     

424株临床分离肠球菌属细菌的耐药性变异

目的探讨肠球菌属临床分离情况与耐药变迁,为指导临床合理用药,控制感染提供依据。方法对广东省东莞中山大学附属东华医院2007--2009年临床送检标本进行常规微生物培养、鉴定和药敏试验,并用WHONET5．4软件统计分析这3年间肠球菌临床分离株在各标本、科室中的分布与耐药性的变迁情况。结果2007--2009年临床分离出肠球菌属细菌424株,其中粪肠球菌338株,占79．7％,屎肠球菌75株,占17．7%,鸟肠球菌11株,占2．6％;肠球菌属在各标本中的分布以尿液为主,占50．2％,其次为伤口分泌物（14．4％）、血液（12．5％）。3年来肠球菌属的菌种和耐药均发生了较大变化,粪肠球菌所占比率每年保持在80％左右,屎肠球菌呈逐年上升趋势,从2007年的13．9%上升至2009年的20．9％,而鸟肠球菌则逐年下降,从4．7％降至0．6％。粪肠球菌对红霉素和四环素的耐药率最高,分别为79．4％～85．7％和84．1％～87．4%,屎肠球菌对氨苄西林、青霉素以及呋喃妥因的耐药率明显高于粪肠球菌,对红霉素、左氧氟沙星、青霉素的耐药率高达80％以上,对呋喃妥因、高浓度的庆大霉素、环丙沙星、四环素、氨苄西林等抗菌药物的耐药率也接近或超过50％。2007年发现1株屎肠球菌对万古霉素耐药。结论肠球菌属耐药性较为严重,不同菌种耐药性有所差异。临床抗感染治疗应以分离菌株的体外抗菌药物敏感性为依据,合理选用抗菌药物,以提高疗效。     

Enterococcal glycopeptide resistance at an Italian teaching hospital

Two thousand one hundred and thirteen strains of enterococci isolated at Pisa General Hospital in 1998 were analysed retrospectively to determine their glycopeptide resistance. Of all the microorganisms isolated in this period, 14.7% were enterococci (1405 Enterococcus faecalis, 19 Enterococcus faecium, six Enterococcus avium and 683 Enterococcus spp.). Two hundred and thirty (10.8%) of these enterococci were resistant or demonstrated reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and/or teicoplanin. The highest rate of resistance was found in outpatient enterococcal strains isolated from the urogenital tract. The frequency of enterococcal glycopeptide resistance at Pisa Hospital is higher than that reported from other areas of Italy.     

临床分离肠球菌耐药性和耐药基因分布及其相关性研究

目的:研究临床分离肠球菌的耐药性、耐药基因分布及其相关性.方法:采用Vitek2 compact全自动细菌鉴定及药敏分析系统进行临床分离肠球菌的鉴定和药敏试验;提取细菌基因组DNA,通过PCR法检测14种肠球菌耐药相关基因;采用SPSS25.0软件对肠球菌耐药性和耐药基因相关性进行统计学分析.结果:临床分离的89株肠球...     

Diversity among high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci

A total of 55 Enterococcus faecalis and 21 Enterococcus faecium non-replicate isolates were obtained from routine clinical specimens, during a 1 year period, in a tertiary care hospital in Athens, Greece. The most common isolation site was the urinary tract (44% of E. faecalis and 33% of E. faecium isolates). No vancomycin resistance was detected. Ampicillin-resistant isolates did not produce beta-lactamase. High-level gentamicin resistance was detected in 22% and 0% of E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates, respectively. The corresponding figures for high-level streptomycin resistance were 40% and 33%. The aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene aac(6')+aph(2") was detected by PCR in 10 of 12 high-level gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis isolates, and the ant(6)-I gene in all high-level streptomycin-resistant isolates of both species. DNA fingerprinting by PFGE grouped 31 of 55 E. faecalis isolates into 10 clusters, and 10 of 21 E. faecium isolates into two clusters, containing two to seven isolates each. Two E. faecalis PFGE types, comprising isolates expressing high-level aminoglycoside resistance, and not observed among non-high-level aminoglycoside-resistant strains, were disseminated in building A of the hospital. In contrast, high-level aminoglycoside resistance seemed to have been acquired nosocomially by a number of genotypically different E. faecium types. Molecular typing was therefore instrumental in understanding the differences in the mode of spread and acquisition of high-level aminoglycoside resistance among these two different enterococcal species.