State efforts to measure the health care safety net

This article describes the role states could play in a national effort to measure and monitor the public health safety net. The authors developed a data collection framework using information from five states on two components of the safety net: structure and demand. Because states are the primary vehicle for access expansions and programs to care for the poor, the authors suggest that they be the primary coordinating mechanism for data collection on the safety net. Because the necessary mechanisms for more uniform standards or criteria to evaluate state data collection activities and capacity remain undeveloped, they recommend using existing data to begin building state capacity to measure and monitor the safety net.     

Using NAMCS to characterize the urban health care safety net

PURPOSE: Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) have been used to describe many facets of ambulatory care, but have been underutilized in their application to the urban health care safety net. Our interest was in comparing the visit characteristics of inner city primary care practices in New York City with those of the rest of the country. METHODS: Data were collected in 15 primary care centers affiliated with the New York City Research & Improvement Networking Group (NYC RING), a practice-based research network. Physicians completed the cross-sectional survey after patient visits using a slightly augmented version of the standard NAMCS form. Results were then compared with a subset of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's public-use dataset for the 2002 NAMCS, selecting only visits to primary care providers and practices in metropolitan statistical areas (N=8,598). Variables of primary interest were visit lengths and diagnoses, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: Physicians in NYC RING collected data on 1,861 encounters. Compared with the national sample, our clinicians see 140% more diabetes visits, 70% more hypertension, and 90% more asthma, and provide 88% more dermatologic care and over 300% more reproductive health services. Visits were, on average, one minute longer in our inner city practices (p<.05), and were generally longer across all diagnosis categories than in the national sample. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and environmentally-related conditions and the provision of more than average specialty care characterize safety net care in New York City.     

Survival strategies for Michigan's health care safety net providers

OBJECTIVE: To understand key adaptive strategies considered by health care safety net organizations serving uninsured and underinsured populations in Michigan. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data collected through interviews at community-based free clinics, family planning clinics, local public health departments, and Federally Qualified Health Centers from 2002 to 2003. RESEARCH DESIGN: In each of six service areas in Michigan, we conducted a multiple-site case study of the four organizations noted above. We conducted interviews with the administrator, the medical or clinical director, the financial or marketing director, and a member of the board of directors. We interviewed 74 respondents at 20 organizations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Organizations perceive that unmet need is expanding faster than organizational capacity; organizations are unable to keep up with demand. Other threats to survival include a sicker patient population and difficulty in retaining staff (particularly nurses). Most clinics are adopting explicit business strategies to survive. To maintain financial viability, clinics are: considering or implementing fees; recruiting insured patients; expanding fundraising activities; reducing services; or turning away patients. Collaborative strategies, such as partnerships with hospitals, have been difficult to implement. Clinics are struggling with how to define their mission given the environment and threats to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive strategies remain a work in progress, but will not be sufficient to respond to increasing service demands. Increased federal funding, or, ideally, a national health insurance program, may be the only viable option for expanding organizational capacity.     

Primary care productivity and the health care safety net in New York City

Urban safety net providers are under pressure to improve primary care productivity. In a survey of ambulatory care facilities in New York City, productivity (measured as the number of primary care visits per provider hour) increases with exam rooms per physician but has no association with computerized information systems or tightly controlled reimbursement. Also, sample facilities rely heavily on residents, which makes these facilities sensitive to medical education policies and raises questions about quality of care for the poor. We conclude that urban safety net providers will have difficulty making the productivity improvements demanded by a more competitive health system.     

Strengthening the free care safety net

For many of the estimated 43 million people in this country who have no health insurance, free care is often the only health care available. With competition forcing hospitals to cut costs, consumer advocates face new challenges as they seek to ensure that free care remains available to all who need it. This issue of States of Health explores the problems facing both consumers who rely on free care and those who provide that care. It highlights what some advocates and communities are doing to address those concerns.     

The vanishing health care safety net: new data on uninsured Americans.

New data obtained from the Census Bureau shows that the number of Americans without any health insurance increased by 1.3 million between 1989 and 1990, bringing the total number of uninsured to 34.7 million, more than at any time since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid 25 years ago. This increase coincided with a 10.5 percent increase in health spending, the second largest in the past three decades. The number of people covered by Medicaid grew by 3.1 million, due to a one-time expansion of eligibility mandated by Congress, but this was more than counter-balanced by a population growth of 3 million and a decrease of 1.3 million in people covered by private insurance. Had Medicaid not been expanded, the number of uninsured would have increased by 4.4 million. The increase in the uninsured affected virtually all parts of the nation. Seven states had increases of more than 100,000 persons each. Only Texas experienced a decrease of that magnitude, but still had the second highest rate of uninsurance of any state. Of the 1.3 million additional uninsured in 1990, 77 percent were male, 32 percent had family incomes in excess of $50,000 per year, and 74 percent had annual family incomes above $25,000. Fewer than 9 percent had incomes below the poverty line. The numbers of uninsured children and senior citizens fell slightly (but not significantly), while the number of uninsured working-age adults rose by 1.4 million. The number of uninsured workers in each of four of 20 major industry groups increased by more than 100,000 in 1990. None of the industry groups showed a significant decline in the number of uninsured. Among professionals, there were substantial numbers of uninsured doctors, engineers, teachers, college professors, clergy, and others, but all legislators and judges were insured. The data presented here largely predate the recession and understate current problems. In 1991 the number of uninsured will likely reach nearly 40 million. Also, these estimates are based on the number of people uninsured at a single time during 1990; a far higher number were temporarily uninsured at some point during the year. Moreover the Census Bureau survey ignores the problem of the underinsurance of at least 50 million insured Americans. Patchwork public programs are grossly inadequate to plug the holes. A national health program covering all Americans could assure access to care and contain costs.     

Pediatric influenza immunization in an integrated safety net health care system

Objective

In 2008 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that all children aged 6 months to 18 years receive annual influenza vaccine. Full pediatric influenza administration has proven difficult. We compared rates of full influenza immunization between a safety net health care system and CDC sentinel sites and evaluated sociodemographic factors associated with full influenza immunization.

Patients and methods

We matched influenza immunization data for 2008–2009 from a health care system immunization registry with patient demographic/billing data and compared rates to CDC sentinel sites using bivariate analysis. We evaluted immunization rates by patient characteristics using multivariate analysis.

Results

Full influenza immunization was achieved in 32% of Denver Health (DH) children compared to 12% at the CDC sites (p < 0.001). The largest differences occurred in children aged 11–12 and 13–18 years, 47% DH vs 12% CDC sites, and 33% DH vs 9% CDC sites respectively, (p < 0.001 for both). In multivariate analysis, DH children were more likely to be immunized if they were Asian, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.59 95%CI (CI) 1.32–1.91, or Hispanic OR 1.18 CI 1.07–1.30, compared to white, spoke Spanish OR 1.19 CI 1.13–1.26, or other non-English language OR 2.05 CI 1.80–2.34, and had a greater number of visits for well care OR 2.86 CI 2.74–2.98 and sick/follow-up care OR 1.59 CI 1.56–1.62, during the influenza season. They were less likely to be immunized if they had commercial insurance OR 0.68 CI 0.62–0.75 or were uninsured OR 0.77 CI 0.72–0.80, compared to Medicaid/SCHIP.

Conclusions

Using immunization registry prompts, standing orders, multiple sites and visit types for immunization, an integrated safety net health care system had higher full influenza immunization rates than the CDC sentinel sites singularly or collectively. These procedures can be applied elsewhere to improve influenza immunization rates.     

Exploring the limits of the safety net: community health centers and care for the uninsured

This paper explores the extent to which community health centers (CHCs) are able to manage their uninsured patient caseloads. We found that CHCs can provide primary care, medications, and medical supplies to most of their uninsured patients on site but are limited in their ability to provide diagnostic, specialty, and behavioral health services. Uninsured patients often fail to receive additional services for which they are referred, and it is much more difficult for CHC physicians to arrange specialty or nonemergency hospital care for their uninsured patients than for their insured patients.