Pancreas preservation for pancreas and islet transplantation: a minireview

Pancreas preservation by cold storage using University of Wisconsin solution was the mainstay method used for pancreas transplantation during the past 2 decades. Other solutions, such as HTK, Celsior, and SCOT 15, could not demonstrate any advantage for short preservation periods. But the advent of clinical islet transplantation and the larger use of controlled non-heart-beating donors have prompted the transplantation community to develop methods for increasing pancreas graft quality while preventing ischemic reperfusion damages. Oxygenation by 1- or 2-layer methods during pancreas preservation, as well as the use of perfluorocarbons, might increase the islet yield. Based on the former methods, there is a renewed interest in machine perfusion and oxygenation in pancreas preservation for pancreas transplantation and islet preparation.     

A comparison of cold storage solutions for pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation

BACKGROUND: Several solutions are used to preserve the pancreas prior to islet isolation. This study sought to assess whether the type of solution had an impact on the isolation outcome. METHODS: We reviewed data from 125 islet isolation procedures performed from January 2002 to January 2005. Pancreata were preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) (n = 101), Celsior (CS) (n = 19), or IGL-1 (n = 5) solutions. Islet isolation results and transplantation rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: UW, CS, and IGL-1 groups were similar according to donor's age, weight, and body mass index. Weight of undigested pancreas was 20 +/- 13.1, 21.4 +/- 15.7, and 17.4 +/- 8.7 g for UW, CS, and IGL-1, respectively (P > .2). Final total number of IEQ was 267,000 +/- 132,000, 277,000 +/- 155,000, and 311,000 +/- 163,000, respectively (P > .4). Success rate (defined as >250,000 IEQ) was 55.5%, 52.9%, and 60% for UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 (P > .9); the transplantation rate was 42.2% for UW, 36.8% for Celsior, and 80% for IGL-1 preservation (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 solutions demonstrated similar islet isolation results. The new IGL-1 solution appears promising.     

Influence of pancreas preservation on human islet isolation outcomes: impact of the two-layer method

BACKGROUND: Human pancreas preservation for islet transplantation holds additional challenges and considerations compared with whole pancreas transplantation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the limitations of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and the potentials of the two-layer method (TLM) for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated human islet isolation records between January 2001 and February 2003. One hundred forty-two human pancreata were procured from cadaveric donors and preserved by means of the UW solution (n=112) or TLM (n=30). Human islet isolations were performed using a standard protocol and assessed by islet recovery and in vitro function of islets. RESULTS: Eight to ten hours of cold ischemia in the UW solution is a critical point for successful islet isolations. It is difficult to recover a sufficient number of viable islets for transplantation from human pancreata with more than 10 hours of cold storage in the UW solution. The overall islet recovery in the TLM group was significantly higher than in the UW group. With 10 to 16 hours of cold storage, the success rates of islet isolations remained at 62% in the TLM group but decreased to 22% in the UW group. Transplanted islets in the TLM group worked well in the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There are time limitations for using the UW solution for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. The TLM is a potential method to prolong the optimal cold storage time for successful islet isolations.     

Clinical application of the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical plus O2) method of pancreas preservation before transplantation

BACKGROUND: The two-layer method [University of Wisconson solution (UW)/perfluorochemical plus O2] for pancreas preservation has been demonstrated to be superior to simple UW storage alone in the canine model. For the first time, we applied the two-layer method to clinical whole-pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Pancreases were placed in the two-layer method in 10 cases and UW alone in 44 cases before transplant. The mean cold ischemic time was 16.5 hr in the two-layer group versus 18.1 hr in the UW group (P=NS). We compared the condition of graft at the time of reperfusion, and then 3 months posttransplant graft function and complications. RESULTS: At the time of reperfusion, no grafts in the two-layer group were edematous, compared with 10(23.3%) of 43 in the UW group (P=0.18). Seven (70%) of 10 grafts in the two-layer group obtained the best overall quality score, compared with 24(57.1%) of 42 in the UW group (P=0.72). Nine (90%) of 10 recipients in the two-layer group became insulin-independent during hospitalization, compared with 31(70.5%) of 44 in the UW group (P=0.26). Time to insulin independence was no different between the two groups. No pancreas grafts preserved by the two-layer method suffered acute rejection. Conclusions. The two-layer preservation method is feasible in human clinical transplantation. It was at least equivalent and may be superior to UW alone in both morphologic and functional assessment of the transplanted pancreas.     

Possibility of islet transplantation from a nonheartbeating donor pancreas resuscitated by the two-layer method

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donors is a problem in islet transplantation, and recent improvements in this field have led to renewed interest in the use of nonheartbeating (NHB) donors. NHB donor pancreata that could provide a significant source for islet transplantation are associated with warm ischemic injury. We tested whether the two-layer method (TL) could improve islet yield and function from damaged pancreata after warm ischemia (WI). METHODS: Lewis rats were divided into six groups. In groups 1 to 3, rats were subjected to 0, 30, and 45 minutes of WI, respectively. Islets were isolated immediately (subgroup a) or after 3-hour preservation with TL (subgroup b). Isolated islets were assessed in terms of islet yield and in vivo function. We also assessed the pancreatic tissue ATP concentration before isolation and distended pancreata morphologically after chemical digestion by H&E staining. RESULTS: Islet yield decreased significantly after 30 minutes of WI in group 2a, whereas TL preservation doubled this decreased yield in group 2b. Forty-five minutes of WI resulted in nearly no islet yield in both groups 3a and 3b. The success rates of transplantation in groups 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b were 100%, 100%, 0%, and 75%, respectively. Increased tissue ATP levels and alleviation of morphological islet damage were observed in group 2b. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that pancreata damaged from 30-minute WI were restored by 3-hour TL preservation. TL may allow the selective use of NHB donors as an alternative source for islet transplantation.     

Human pancreas procurement for pancreas and islet transplantation

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is a disease characterized by a deficiency of insulin secretion by beta islet cells. Integral pancreatic transplantation and islet cell transplantation represent two possibilities of replacing the beta islet cells. The aim of this paper is to analyze the main aspects of selection criteria of the pancreas donor and surgical methods of preservation for integral pancreas or islet cell transplantation. There are described the pancreas procurements realized by the Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation team from Fundeni Clinical Institute between December 2005-December 2006 and correlation between the donor's and pancreas features and the quality of islet cell isolation. The selection of pancreas donor and the accomplishment of pancreas procurement represent important factors in the post-transplantation course of the graft. The data from pancreas/islet cell transplantation centers suggest that the factors that influence positively the course of graft are: the donor's age, body mass index, cold ischemia time.     

Influence of collagenase loading on long-term preservation of pig pancreas by the two-layer method for subsequent islet isolation

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the two-layer method (TLM) for long-term human pancreas preservation revealed the enormous potential of TLM to improve graft function of isolated islets. It is still unclear whether pig islets can be successfully isolated from pancreases after prolonged cold ischemia. To clarify this question, pig pancreases were subjected to 7-hour preservation by University of Wisconsin solution (UWS) storage or TLM. Another aim was to verify whether TLM can be synergistically combined with intraductal collagenase injection before cold storage. METHODS: After intraductal flush with UWS, organs were distended with 4.4 PZ-U/g of UWS-dissolved collagenase NB-8 and neutral protease adjusted to respectively 1.1, 0.2, 0.5, or 0.8 DMC-U/g for pancreases freshly procured (n=6) or distended with enzymes before (TLM preloaded, n=7) or after cold storage (UWS storage, n=4; TLM postloaded, n=10). RESULTS: Purified islet yield decreased from 429,200+/-86,700 islet equivalents (IEQ) in unstored pancreases to respectively 37,670+/-19620, 210,400+/-22900 and 238,000+/-26600 IEQ in UWS-stored (P<0.01), TLM-preloaded, or postloaded organs (P<0.05). Purity (>90%), viability (>95%), and insulin content were not different between groups. Islets from UWS-stored pancreases fragmented extensively, preventing further assessment of in vivo function. Compared with other experimental groups, islets from TLM-preloaded organs were characterized by enhanced basal and stimulated insulin release. Sustained normoglycemia was observed in diabetic nude mice transplanted with islets from TLM-postloaded or unstored pancreases in contrast with transient function in TLM-preloaded islets. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that significant amounts of intact pig islets can be isolated after prolonged pancreas preservation by TLM. Enzyme administration before TLM preservation decreases islet graft function.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is currently the standard preservation solution used for abdominal organ transplantation. This study assesses the efficacy of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) compared with UW in pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between October 2002 and August 2003, 20 pancreas transplants were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: UW (n=10) and HTK (n=10). Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean cold ischemia time for both groups was 11 +/-3 hr. RESULTS: There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.5 +/- 1.2 L vs. UW: 3.4 +/-0.8 L; P =0.03). Patient and graft survivals to date were 100% in both groups. Serum fasting blood glucose, peak amylase, and serial amylase levels remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Within this range of cold ischemia time, UW and HTK demonstrate similar efficacy in pancreas preservation.     

The effect of two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical) preservation method on clinical grade pancreata prior to islet isolation and transplantation

BACKGROUND: Research-grade pancreata preserved by the two-layer method (TLM) compared to organs stored with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution prior to islet isolation result in significantly better islet yields. However, it is unknown whether the TLM improves islet yields from pancreata that meet the criteria for the selection of clinical-grade organs. METHODS: Six clinical-grade pancreata were preserved for 4.8 +/- 0.5 hour in UW and three clinical-grade pancreata were preserved by the TLM for 11.7 +/- 2.0 hour. The local team procured all pancreata. All donors were hemodynamically stable without norepinephrine usage and length of hospitalization was less than 96 hour. Causes of death were either head trauma or cerebrovascular accident. Islets were isolated and evaluated according to the Edmonton protocol. RESULTS: The TLM as compared to UW resulted in a significant increase in islet yields (3415 +/- 227 vs 2006 +/- 337 IE/g pancreas, P <.03). The quality of islets as assessed by visual score was significantly better in the TLM group (8.7 +/- 0.2 vs 7.3 +/- 0.3, P <.02) but other parameters (viability, survival rate after culture, insulin content, stimulation index) were similar between the two groups. We transplanted all three islet preparations in the TLM group but only two of six preparations from the UW group. CONCLUSION: Compared to UW, exposure of pancreata to the TLM resulted in greater islet yields and extended preservation times with clinical grade pancreas. Pancreata should be preserved by the TLM prior to islet isolation even for donors that meet clinical grade organ selection criteria. The Human Islet Transplantation in Seattle (HITS) Consortium is supported in part by a grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International. The HITS consortium is an islet transplant program involving the University of Washington, Pacific Northwest Research Institute, the Puget Sound Blood Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Swedish Hospital, and the Virginia Mason Research Center.     

Efficacy of the oxygen-charged static two-layer method for short-term pancreas preservation and islet isolation from nonhuman primate and human pancreata

Previous reports indicate that the two-layer method (TLM) of human pancreas preservation is superior to University of Wisconsin solution (UW) when pancreata are preserved for extended periods (i.e., >24 h) prior to islet isolation. In this study, the efficacy of using the TLM for preserving pancreata for short periods (i.e., <13 h) was evaluated using both nonhuman primate and human pancreata preserved with a TLM kit precharged with oxygen. An oxygen precharged TLM (static TLM) was established and compared with the original TLM with continuous oxygen supply. For the static TLM, the perfluorochemical was fully oxygenated and the oxygen supply removed prior to pancreas preservation. In the primate model, pancreata were preserved by the static TLM, the original TLM, and UW for 5 h prior to islet isolation. In the human model, pancreata were preserved with the static TLM or the original TLM or UW for 4-13 h. Both primate and human pancreata were processed by intraductal collagenase injection and digestion followed by continuous density gradient purification to isolate islets. Islets were assessed for islet yield, purity, viability, and in vitro functionality. In the primate model, islet yield, viability, and in vitro functionality were significantly improved by both the static TLM and the original TLM with similar results. Postculture islet yields were 23,877 +/- 3619 IE/g in the static TLM, 21,895 +/- 3742 IE/g in the original TLM, and 6773 +/- 735 IE/g in UW. In the human model, both the static TLM and the original TLM significantly increased islet yield compared with UW with postculture islet yields of 2659 +/- 549 IE/g in the static TLM, 2244 +/- 557 IE/g in the original TLM, and 1293 +/- 451 IE/g in UW. Nonhuman primate and human pancreata stored in the static TLM, immediately upon procurement, yield isolated islets of a substantially higher quantity than when pancreata are stored in UW. Thus, the use of the static TLM should replace the use of UW for storage of pancreata during transport prior to islet isolation.     

Improved islet yield and function with ductal injection of University of Wisconsin solution before pancreas preservation

BACKGROUND: Ensuring sufficient islet yield from preserved pancreases is a critical step in clinical islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic ductal injection, performed at procurement, using a small volume of preservation solution before cold storage (ductal preservation method) would improve islet yield and function from rat pancreases preserved for 6 and 24 hr. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Islets were isolated from Lewis rats. Pancreases were classified into five groups: fresh (group 1); preserved for 6 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 2 and 3); and preserved for 24 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 4 and 5). We assessed islet yield, function, and viability of pancreatic ductal cells. RESULTS: Islet yields per pancreas in groups 1 to 5 were 2010+/-774, 674+/-450, 1418+/-528, 527+/-263, and 1655+/-618 (islet equivalent) (+/-SD), respectively. Stimulation indices in groups 1 to 5 were 11.97+/-3.17, 6.48+/-4.04, 12.44+/-5.65, 2.56+/-2.03, and 5.55+/-2.71. Functional success rates in groups 1 to 5 were 100%, 0%, 100%, 0%, and 66.7%. Percentages of nonviable pancreatic duct cells in groups 1 to 5 were 3.8+/-2.7%, 59.7+/-4.4%, 19.5+/-7.3%, 64.7+/-4.5%, and 17.2+/-2.6%. In all experiments, the differences were significant between the groups without versus the groups with ductal preservation (P<0.05, group 2 vs. group 3 and group 4 vs. group 5). CONCLUSIONS: Ductal preservation improved islet yield and function after 6 and 24 hr of preservation. Well-preserved pancreatic ducts maintained good distribution of collagenase solution.     

Preservation of the donor pancreas for whole pancreas and islet transplantation

Ridgway D, Manas D, Shaw J, White S. Preservation of the donor pancreas for whole pancreas and islet transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 1–19. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Abstract:  Whole pancreas and islet cell transplantation are both reliant upon the procurement and preservation of a high quality donor pancreas for a successful outcome. In the climate of a reducing donor pool it is imperative that donor optimization, meticulous surgical retrieval and evidence based methods of preservation are practiced to ensure optimal graft quality. Moreover expanded criteria donors and novel methods of pancreas preservation have the potential to expand the number of usable grafts and increase the availability of these transplant modalities to suitable patients with diabetes. This article provides a review of the current literature surrounding donor management, surgical technique and the various technologies of organ preservation applicable to the donor pancreas.     

Comparison of M-Kyoto solution and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution with a trypsin inhibitor for pancreas preservation in islet transplantation

The use of University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation solution in islet transplantation has some disadvantages, including inhibition of collagenase activity for pancreatic digestion. Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution has demonstrated an efficacy similar to UW solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation. Recently, we reported that islet yield from porcine pancreata was significantly gtreater when they were preserved using M-Kyoto solution compared with UW solution. Here, we compared HTK solution with ulinastatin (M-HTK) and M-Kyoto solution for islet yield. In porcine islet isolation, islet yield after purification was significantly greater in the M-Kyoto/perfluorochemical (PFC) group compared with the M-HTK/PFC group. The M-Kyoto/PFC group had a significantly lower ADP/ATP ratio compared with the M-HTK/PFC group, suggesting that different islet yields might be due to the differences as energy sources of the solutions used. In conclusion, M-Kyoto/PFC solution is better for pancreas preservation before islet isolation than M-HTK/PFC solution.     

Effect of the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution-perfluorochemical plus O2) method of pancreas preservation on human islet isolation,as assessed by the Edmonton Isolation Protocol

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for isolating islets require that pancreata stored with University of Wisconsin solution (UW) are processed within 12 hours of cold storage. In this study, we hypothesized that the two-layer method (TLM) could extend the acceptable preservation period of pancreata before islet isolation and increase islet yields. METHODS: In the first experimental set, eight pancreata were maintained for an average of 8.3+/-1.2 hours in UW and transferred into the TLM for an additional 14.3+/-1.1 hours for a total cold ischemic period of 22.6+/-1.6 hours (prolonged TLM). Four pancreata were maintained as a control group in UW alone for a total of 21.3+/-2.0 hours. In the second experimental set, six pancreata were maintained for an average of 6.4+/-1.8 hours in UW followed by 4.8+/-0.8 hours with the TLM for a total preservation time of 11.3+/-2.5 hours (short TLM). The control organs for the short TLM group were stored for an average of 9.5+/-1.3 hours in UW alone. Islets were isolated and evaluated according to the Edmonton protocol. RESULTS: Between each group of the two experimental sets, there was no significant difference in donor-related factors (i.e. gender, age, body mass index [BMI], etc.). The TLM as compared with UW preservation resulted in a significant increase in islet yields postpurification for both short (3,353+/-394 islet equivalents [IE] vs. 2,027+/-415 IE; mean+/-SEM) and prolonged (2,404+/-503 IE vs. 514+/-180 IE) periods of storage. Furthermore, islet yields after prolonged storage with the TLM were not significantly different from organs maintained for only a short period with UW (P=0.17). The quality of islets as assessed by size, postculture viability, survival rates, insulin content, and insulin secretion were similar for each of the four groups. CONCLUSION: In comparison with UW organ preservation, exposure of pancreata to the TLM result in greater islet yields and extended preservation times.