Dual chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection

Dual hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are common in HBV or HCV endemic areas. However, several clinical and pathogenetic issues remain unresolved. First, clinical and in vitro studies suggest the interactions between two viruses. The dynamics of the interaction in untreated setting versus treated setting and its influence on the long-term outcomes await further studies. A key issue regarding viral interactions is whether modulation of infection occurs in the same dually infected individual hepatocyte of the liver. Clarifying this issue may help to understand the reciprocal interference between HCV and HBV and provide clues for future immunopathogenetic studies. Second, the prevalence and clinical significance of coexisting occult HBV infection in patients with chronic HCV infection need further investigations. Third, combination therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin appears to be just as effective and safe for the treatment of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients chronically infected with active chronic hepatitis C as it is in patients with HCV monoinfection. Nevertheless, one-third of dually infected patients with nondetectable serum HBV DNA-level pretreatment developed HBV reactivation posttreatment. How to prevent and treat this reactivation should be clarified. Furthermore, about 10% of the dually infected patients lost HBsAg. Underlying mechanisms await further investigations. Finally, the optimal treatment strategies for dually infected patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B should be identified in future clinical trials.     

慢性肝病患者HCV与HBV重叠感染与预后

目的探讨ＨＣＶ与ＨＢＶ重叠感染对慢性肝病过程、预后及对乙型肝炎病毒复制的影响。方法应用第二代抗＿ＨＣＶＥＬＩＳＡ及ＲＴ＿ＰＣＲ法测定１８７例ＨＢｓＡｇ阳性慢性肝病患者抗＿ＨＣＶ及ＨＣＶ＿ＲＮＡ，并对ＨＣＶ与ＨＢＶ重叠感染者的肝损害，ＨＣＶ，ＨＢＶ间的相互作用及预后进行分析。结果抗＿ＨＣＶ，ＨＣＶ＿ＲＮＡ的阳性率在慢性肝炎（轻度）１３．３％，慢性肝炎（中～重度）１６．１％，肝硬变２２．７％，慢性重型肝炎６３．６％，肝细胞癌１３．３％。平均阳性率１８．２％，慢性重型肝炎抗＿ＨＣＶ，ＨＣＶ＿ＲＮＡ的检出率最高，明显高于肝脏损害的其他肝病（Ｐ＜０．０５），近半数以上ＨＣＶ慢性感染已与ＨＢＶ重叠感染。结论ＨＣＶ与ＨＢＶ重叠感染的慢性肝病患者预后较差。但并未发现ＨＣＶ对ＨＢＶ复制具有阻遏作用。     

Coinfections with hepatitis g and/or c virus in hepatitis B-related chronic liver disease

Concurrent infections with HGV and/or HCV (HGV/HCV) were investigated in 196 patients with HBV-related chronic liver disease (115 chronic hepatitis, 31 liver cirrhosis, 50 hepatocellular carcinoma), and in 100 HBsAg carriers. Coinfections were detected in 18 (9.2%) patients with HGV (10) or HCV (5) or both agents (3), but in none of the HBsAg carriers. Patients with coinfection were more frequently exposed to blood transfusions (55.6% vs 5.6%) and also were more commonly anti-HBe positive. Serum levels of HBV-DNA were lower in patients with HCV coinfection than in those coinfected with HGV. Interferon was administered to 39 patients with chronic active hepatitis including 7 patients with HGV/HCV coinfection. Sustained clearance of HBV-DNA was observed in 10 (25.6%) patients who were solely infected with HBV. These patients were significantly younger and had much lower histological scores than non-responders. Patients with HCV coinfection had significantly higher pre-treatment histological scores than those without HCV. After interferon treatment, a significant reduction in histological scores was observed in all patients except those coinfected with HGV/HCV. None of the 7 patients with coinfection had sustained clearance of HBV-DNA or HCV-RNA, and only one had cleared HGV-RNA. These results suggest that parenteral exposure is a risk factor for HGV/HCV coinfection in chronic HBV infection. HGV infection shows no significant impact on chronic HBV infection. HCV coinfection appears to inhibit HBV replication, but causes more severe chronic hepatitis and increases resistance to interferon therapy.     

High prevalence of anti-hepatitis B virus serological markers in patients with hepatitis C virus related chronic liver disease in Japan

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence is accumulating that hepatitis B virus (HBV) is present in patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen negative but have antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) often possess HBV related serological markers. Data on the seroprevalence of HBV infection in patients with HCV related chronic liver disease were collected to evaluate the significance of the presence of antibodies to HBV. METHODS: The prevalence of HBV related serological markers was analysed in a total of 2014 Japanese patients with HCV infection. The control group comprised 352 subjects without liver disorder. RESULTS: A large number of patients (49.9%) with HCV related chronic liver disease including hepatocellular carcinoma were positive for anti-HBc. In addition, the prevalence of anti-HBc closely correlated with the clinical stage of the liver disease. There was no relation between a past history of blood transfusion and the prevalence of anti-HBc. Notably, anti-HBc was the only serological marker for HBV infection in a significant number of patients with HCV related chronic liver disease (24.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide further evidence for the high prevalence of anti-HBc in patients with HCV related chronic liver disease, particularly those with hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that HBV infection, probably including latent infection, may play an important role in carcinogenesis in these patients.     

Human parvovirus B19 infection in patients with chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Parvovirus B19 has been reported to be detected in the sera of patients with acute or chronic hepatitis. The prevalence and clinical significance of B19 DNA in serum samples from patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were investigated. METHODS: Serum samples from 54 patients with HBV infection, 51 with HCV infection and 53 normal controls were examined for anti-B19 antibodies and B19 DNA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Southern blotting and direct nucleotide sequencing, respectively. RESULTS: Anti-B19 IgM and IgG antibodies were detected in 19 (35.2%) and 46 (85.2%) of 54 serum samples from patients with HBV infection, and eight (15.7%) and 36 (70.6%) of 51 serum samples from patients with HCV infection. B19 DNA was detected in serum samples of 20 (37%) of 54 patients with HBV infection and 12 (23.5%) of 51 patients with HCV infection, but not in 53 serum samples from normal controls. The occurrence of liver dysfunction was not affected by B19 infection in patients with HBV and HCV infection (P > 0.05). All of the 20 serum samples with B19 DNA from patients with chronic HBV infection and all of the 12 serum samples with B19 DNA from patients with chronic HCV infection exhibited TW-3 subtype and TW-9 subtype, respectively. The variant subtypes of B19 were found to be distinctive in patients with HBV or HCV infection. CONCLUSIONS: These data revealed that human parvovirus B19 infection was frequently found in patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection. The variant genotypes were present in patients with different chronic hepatitis. The coinfection of B19 with HBV or HCV did not increase the frequency of liver dysfunction in patients with chronic hepatitis. Long-term longitudinal studies are required to determine the natural course of parvovirus B19 infection and whether its coinfection affects the natural history of chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C.     

Current therapy for hepatitis C or D or immunodeficiency virus concurrent infection with chronic hepatitis B

Concurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis delta virus (HDV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) appears to increase the risk of progressive liver disease including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There is a 10% prevalence of HCV infection in chronic HBV or HDV infection. Serological evidence of previous exposure to HBV is found in more than 80% of HIV-positive patients in the high risk group. Notably, the most recently acquired virus tends to suppress the pre-existing virus. In chronic HBV infection acquired perinatally or in early childhood, usually HCV is dominant and may suppress or even displace HBV and HDV. Less frequently, HBV or HDV suppresses HCV. It is generally agreed that the dominant virus should be identified in order to make appropriate treatment decisions. Studies with standard interferon (IFN) to treat patients with HCV dominantly dual HBV/HCV infection have showed only limited virological response. But high dose of IFN has been demonstrated with better response rate. Combined ribavirin with standard or pegylated IFN therapy could achieve a sustained HCV clearance rate comparable with those infected with HCV alone. On the contrary, patients with HBV dominantly dual viral infection might indicate more appropriate addition of lamivudine to IFN than ribavirin. Additionally, patients with concurrent infection of HBV and HDV, IFN seems to be the only effective agent. However, the efficacy of IFN is related to the dose. High dose of IFN [9 MU tiw (thrice per week)] and longer treatment duration (at least 2 years) have been shown to achieve adequate virological response. In patients with concurrently infected HBV and HIV, anti-HBV therapy should be considered for all patients with evidence of liver disease, irrespective of the CD4 cell count. In patients not requiring antiretroviral therapy, HBV therapy should be preferentially based on IFN, adefovir, or telbivudine. In contrast, in patients with CD4 cell counts <350 cells/μl or those already on antiretroviral therapy, agents with double anti-HBV and anti-HIV activity are preferred. At present, the evidence of therapeutic efficacy is not sufficient to make a recommendation in treating patients with dual HBV/HCV or HBV/HDV or HBV/HIV infection. Further studies of the well-designed, larger scale are needed to elucidate the role of different regimens or combination in the treatment of dual viral infection.     

Coinfection with hepatitis B and C or B, C and δ viruses results in severe chronic liver disease and responds poorly to terferon-a treatment

SUMMARY. Chronic coinfection with the hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis δ (HDV) viruses is known to cause severe liver disease, but the importance of coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HBV has not been well documented. In the present study, the clinical and pathological severity of liver disease among patients with hepatitis resulting from multiple viruses was examined and an open trial of the efficacy of interferon-α2b (IFN-α) treatment was conducted. Nineteen patients with chronic HBV and HCV infection and 17 with HBV, HCV and HDV infection were studied: 12 in each group underwent liver biopsy. For each coinfected patient, two patients infected with HCV alone were selected as controls, and these were matched for age and risk factor and were estimated to have been infected for a similar duration. Coinfection with HBV and HCV or HBV, HCV and HDV was associated with more severe liver disease than HCV alone (P < 0.01); total Scheer score, portal and lobular inflammation and fibrosis were all worse in coinfected subjects. Eight patients with chronic HBV and HCV were treated with recombinant IFN-α2b [3 million units (MU), thrice weekly for 6 months]. Liver function tests normalized in two patients and one lost hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Seven patients with hepatitis B, C and δ coinfection were treated with the same regimen and only one normalized serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) during (and after) treatment. It is concluded that coinfection with multiple hepatitis viruses is associated with histologically more severe liver disease than HCV alone. Short-and long-term responses to doses of IFN-α that are used to treat HCV are infrequent, but further studies are required to determine whether higher-dose IFN-α may benefit patients with combined hepatitis virus infections.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B or C in HIV-infected patients with dual viral hepatitis

Dual chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are recognized in 3%-5% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals. More severe liver disease is seen in these patients. Viral interference may account for the fact that replication of one virus generally predominates over replication of the other. The impact that treatment of HBV or HCV infection has on this reciprocal inhibition is not well established. No evidence of reactivation of either HBV or HCV was seen when complete suppression of the other predominant virus was achieved with specific therapy in 21 subjects with HIV infection and dual HBV/HCV infections. This information has important pathogenic implications and may influence therapeutic decisions.     

Liver stiffness measurements in patients with HBV vs HCV chronic hepatitis: a comparative study

AIM:To assess the values of liver stiffness (LS) in pa-tients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronic hepatitis and to compare them with those in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic hepatitis. METHODS: The study included 140 patients with HBV chronic hepatitis, and 317 patients with HCV chronic hepatitis, in which LS was measured (FibroScan-Echo-sens) and liver biopsy was performed in the same session (assessed according to the Metavir score). RESULTS:According to the Metavir score of the 140 HBV p...     

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus among Saudi patients with chronic liver diseases.

The prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in 55 patients with chronic liver diseases including liver cirrhosis (42 patients), liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (8 patients), and chronic active hepatitis (4 patients). A total of 63.6% of these patients were positive for anti-HCV, a significantly higher prevalence than the rate of 3.9% observed in 488 asymptomatic volunteers. Of the 42 patients with liver cirrhosis 16 (38.1%) had positive anti-HCV without any markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV), while 12 (28.6%) had markers of neither HCV nor HBV infection. Our findings suggest that HCV infection may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease in Saudi Arabia, which is an area of endemic HBV infection. Screening for anti HCV should be considered mandatory in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) especially where the etiology appears obscure.     

Cryoglobulinemia due to chronic viral hepatitis infections is not a major problem in clinical practice

Background: Essential mixed cryoglobulinemia (EMC) is a systemic disease frequently associated with chronic viral hepatitis. This study was conducted in order to assess the prevalence of EMC in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. We also evaluated the possible associations of EMC with (1) the clinical, virological, and histological status of liver disease; (2) the presence of EMC-related symptoms; and (3) the response rate to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) treatment, in an attempt to address whether EMC is a major problem in hepatitis patients. Methodology: A total of 154 consecutive patients (104 with HBV and 50 with HCV infection) were investigated for the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF), cryoglobulins, and EMC-related manifestations. Sixty-two HBV patients were chronic carriers of hepatitis B surface antigen, 29 had chronic hepatitis B, and 13 HBV cirrhosis. Thirty-five HCV patients had chronic hepatitis C and 15 HCV cirrhosis. HCV genotyping was performed in 44 patients. Results: The prevalence of cryoglobulins was significantly higher (P<0.001) in HCV patients (46%) than in HBV patients (13.4%). EMC was associated with a high frequency of RF detection, older age, and longer duration of viral diseases. Weakness or malaise, arthralgias, and purpura were significantly more frequent in cryoglobulin-positive patients. These manifestations, however, were mild in most of the patients. The EMC-related symptoms were significantly associated with the presence of HCV infection, increased levels of cryoglobulins, and RF detection (P<0.01, P<0.05, and P<0.000005, respectively). Worse liver histology was unrelated to a higher prevalence or increased levels of cryoglobulins in both HBV and HCV infection. There was no relationship between EMC and a specific HCV genotype. IFN-alpha therapy led to the disappearance of cryoglobulins and EMC-related manifestations in most cases. The response rate to IFN-alpha was similar in both groups of patients (with and without EMC). Conclusions: A higher prevalence of EMC was observed in HCV patients than in HBV patients. However, this finding was unrelated to overt clinical manifestations of EMC, a specific HCV genotype, or worse liver histology. The latter suggests that EMC does not contribute to liver injury and vice versa, that EMC pathogenesis is rather unrelated to the degree of liver injury. From a clinical point of view, testing for cryoglobulins seems reasonable only for HCV patients with EMC-related manifestations, since this may have therapeutic consequences. RF detection could be used primarily as a surrogate marker for the existence of cryoglobulins.     

慢性肝病者乙型和丙型肝炎病毒重叠感染的研究

对２１３例老年慢性肝病患者的乙型肝炎病毒（ＨＢＶ）和丙型肝炎病毒（ＨＣＶ）血清标志物检测发现：ＨＢＶ感染占７３．２４％、ＨＢＶ和ＨＣＶ重叠感染占重叠感染点１５．４９％、ＨＣＶ感染占７．０４％、其它占４．２６％；ＨＢＶ阴性者ＨＣＶ检出率高于ＨＢＶ阳性者，肝癌和肝硬化患者较慢性肝炎患者高；ＨＢＶ和ＨＣＶ重叠感染患者的血清血蛋白下降显著，γ－球蛋白升高明显，肝硬化并腹水和上消化道出血者了多。结果表明，老     

Histomorphological characteristics of liver tissue in patients with chronic viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVE : Chronic viral hepatitis and cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HBC) or both constitute the majority of cases of liver diseases in China. Pathologists often need to differentiate between the morphological features of HBV and HCV. The aim of this study was to explore the differences in inflammatory activity, fibrosis and morphological characteristics in various types of chronic viral hepatitis. METHODS : Inflammatory activity and degree of fibrosis in liver biopsies taken from 224 patients with chronic hepatitis were determined according to the Diagnostic Criteria of Chronic Hepatitis, China, 1995. Each of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) and the hepatitis C virus nuclear core protein (CP₁₀) were detected on paraffin sections of the biopsies by using immunohistochemical methods. Patients were divided into HBV, HCV and HBV + HCV infection groups and the differences among these groups were assessed on the basis of histopathological characteristics including inflammatory activity, fibrosis, steatosis, intrahepatic cholestasis, Councilman bodies and ground‐glass hepatocytes. RESULTS : The HCV infection group had more severe inflammatory activity, fibrosis and intrahepatic cholestasis than did the HBV infection group. The degree of inflammatory activity and fibrosis in the HBV + HCV infection group was moderate, but the degree of intrahepatic cholestasis was the most severe of the three study groups. Ground‐glass hepatocytes were only noted in HBV‐infected specimens. There was no difference in the occurrences of steatosis and Councilman bodies among the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS : The degree of inflammatory activity and fibrosis induced by HCV in hepatocytes is more severe than that induced by HBV. The histological changes observed in liver infected by both HBV and HCV are no more severe than those observed in liver infected with either HBV or HCV. Intrahepatic cholestasis may play an important role in aggravating damage to hepatocytes.     

重叠乙型和丙型肝炎病毒感染的临床与病理分析

目的 观察HBV和HCV重叠感染的临床与病理,探讨HBV和HCV相互作用的特点.方法 收集226例慢性肝病患者的血清学指标,实时荧光定量PCR法测定HBV DNA和HCVRNA,ELISA检测HBV血清标志物、抗-HCV抗体.行肝穿刺活组织病理检查、免疫组织化学HBsAg、HBcAg和原位杂交HBV DNA、HCV RNA检测.计数资料比较采用X2检验或Fisher确切率检验.结果 HBV和HCV重叠感染的重度慢性肝炎患者比例为62.50%,高于HBV或HCV单独感染者的27.05%和30.56%(X2=14.70,P＜0.01).HBV感染组的血ALT、AST、TBil、DBil和Alb高于HBV和HCV重叠感染组和HCV感染组,差异均有统计学意义(X2=8.52,P＜0.05).重叠感染组和HBV感染组的血HBsAg与肝内HBsAg一致率比较,差异均有统计学意义(X2=15.60,P＜0.01).HBV和HCV重叠感染组血清HBV DNA阳性率为12.5%,低于HBV单独感染组的87.7%(X2=17.66,P＜0.01);而HBV和HCV重叠感染组HCV RNA阳性率为75.0%,低于HCV单独感染组的80.6%,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 HBV和HCV重叠感染导致的肝损伤更明显.     

Risks associated with hepatitis A and hepatitis B in patients with hepatitis C.

Individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are at risk for acquiring hepatitis A virus (HAV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) because of shared risk factors. A number of organizations recommend vaccination against HAV and HBV for patients with HCV. The rationale for vaccinating these patients is to prevent hepatic superinfections. Acute HAV superinfection causes more severe disease, acute hepatic failure, and higher fatality rates in patients with underlying chronic liver disease, specifically chronic HBV infection and chronic HCV infection. Available data, although limited, suggest that HBV coinfection with HAV and HCV causes more severe hepatic injury than infection with HAV or HCV alone. At standard doses, hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines are safe and immunogenic in patients with mild-to-moderate hepatitis C or chronic liver disease. Regardless of disease severity, vaccination should be routinely administered to patients upon diagnosis of HCV infection. Early vaccination is important because response to vaccination is reduced as liver disease progresses. Prevaccination and postvaccination serology testing is recommended in specific populations. A new combination hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine has been shown to be as safe and effective as monovalent hepatitis A and B vaccines and is currently under review by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A combination vaccine would offer ease of administration and convenience and could increase compliance in patients with hepatitis C or other chronic liver disease: two groups that should be more aggressively targeted by healthcare professionals.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C antibody in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea

Summary. To investigate the contribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) to chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea, antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) were tested by enzyme immunoassay in 1759 patients with chronic liver disease and HCC, and in 808 healthy adults. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 1.6% in 808 controls. Anti-HCV was present in 32 (7.7%) of 418 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and 128 (53.1%) of 241 HBsAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis, 16 (6.0%) of 265 HBsAg-positive and 90 (30.5%) of 295 HBsAg-negative patients with liver cirrhosis, and 16 (4.8%) of 330 HBsAg-positive and 61 (29.0%) of 210 HBsAg-negative patients with HCC. Antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were present in 80–88% of patients who were seropositive for anti-HCV and seronegative for HBsAg. Among the sera from 114 patients with HBsAg-negative and anti-HCV-positive chronic liver diseases, HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 54 (47.4%) and 61 (53.3%), respectively. Both HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected in 4 (4.4%) samples. The mean age of the patients with both HBsAg and anti-HCV was not different from that of patients who were seropositive for HBsAg alone. These findings indicate that current and/or past HBV infection is still the main cause of chronic liver disease in Korea. Although multivariate analysis showed that anti-HCV is a risk factor for chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis of the liver and HCC, PCR data for HBV DNA and HCV RNA indicate that HCV infection plays only a minor role in HBsAg-positive as well as in HBsAg-negative liver disease and does not accelerate the development of HCC in HBV carriers.     

Hepatitis B virus DNA in sera and liver tissue of HBsAg negative patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA has been detected in HBsAg-negative patients with hepatitis C. We determined the rate and explored the clinical significance of HBsAg negative HBV coinfections in Austrian patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Sera (n=82, group I) or liver tissue (n=16, group II) from 98 HBsAg negative Austrian patients with chronic hepatitis C were examined for HBV DNA by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For control purposes, sera from 15 patients with chronic HBV infection (8 HBsAg positive, 7 HBsAg negative, all HBV PCR positive) were examined. RESULTS: HBV DNA was detected in 22% of sera and 19% of liver tissue specimens of patients with chronic hepatitis C. No significant difference in mean aminotransferase values, markers of HBV infection, inflammatory disease activity, or degree of hepatic fibrosis was observed in patients with or without HBV DNA. Anti-HBc alone as a marker of past HBV infection was more frequent in chronic hepatitis C patients compared to control individuals. Negative HCV PCR was more common (p=0.009) among patients with positive HBV PCR in serum. When examining repeat sera for HBV DNA, positive results were obtained in previously negative, but also negative results in previously positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Coinfection with HBV can be demonstrated by PCR in a considerable number of HBsAg negative Austrian patients with chronic hepatitis C. HBV infection seems to suppress HCV replication even in HBsAg negative patients with dual infection. HBV coinfection in HCV infected patients cannot be excluded by negative HBsAg status alone. Repeat PCR examinations are needed to exclude dual infections.     

European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines for the clinical management and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C coinfection in HIV-infected adults

OBJECTIVES: With the decline in HIV-associated morbidity and mortality following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), liver disease has emerged as a major cause of death in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected persons. Therefore, screening for underlying viral hepatitis coinfection and the provision of management and treatment recommendations for patients with chronic viral hepatitis are of great importance in preventing, as far as possible, the development of liver disease. With the introduction of new agents for the treatment of hepatitis B and increased knowledge of how best to manage hepatitis C, an update of current guidelines for management of HBV and HCV coinfection with HIV is warranted. SUMMARY: Clearly, all HIV-infected patients should be screened for hepatitis A, B and C, taking into account shared pathways of transmission. Patients who are seronegative for hepatitis A and B should be considered for vaccination. In HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B, the first important differentiation is whether HAART is required or not. In the setting of stable HIV infection, with no need for HAART, several treatment options are available, namely treatment with interferon, early initiation of HAART, or selective non-HIV active anti-HBV nucleoside therapy, with the aim of achieving undetectable HBV DNA levels. In most cases, undetectable HBV DNA can only be achieved with combination therapy. With regard to hepatitis C, individualized tailoring of the duration of HCV therapy is advisable, taking into account rapid or delayed virological response. In patients who do not achieve at least a 2 log drop in HCV RNA at week 12, treatment can be terminated because of the low probability of achieving sustained virological response. Overall, with the currently available treatment algorithms, HCV can be eradicated in over 50% of patients. Therefore, HCV therapy should be considered and discussed with the patient if an indication for HCV therapy (elevated liver enzymes, positive HCV RNA and >F1 fibrosis) is present. CONCLUSIONS: Management of underlying hepatitis B and/or C in patients with HIV infection is of great importance in preventing liver disease-associated morbidity and mortality.     

Sarcopenia in chronic viral hepatitis: From concept to clinical relevance

Although the frequency of metabolic risk factors for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remain the most relevant risk factors for advanced liver disease worldwide. In addition to liver damage, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are associated with a myriad of extrahepatic manifestations including mixed cryoglobulinaemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, renal disease, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, sicca syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis-like polyarthritis, and autoantibody production. Recently, the list has grown to include sarcopenia. Loss of muscle mass or muscle function is a critical feature of malnutrition in cirrhotic patients and has been found in approximately 23.0%-60.0% of patients with advanced liver disease. Nonetheless, among published studies, there is significant heterogeneity in the aetiologies of hepatic diseases and measurement methods used to determine sarcopenia. In particular, the interaction between sarcopenia, CHB and CHC has not been completely clarified in a real-world setting. Sarcopenia can result from a complex and multifaceted virus-host-environment interplay in individuals chronically infected with HBV or HCV. Thus, in the present review, we provide an overview of the concept, prevalence, clinical relevance, and potential mechanisms of sarcopenia in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, with an emphasis on clinical outcomes, which have been associated with skeletal muscle loss in these patients. A comprehensive overview of sarcopenia in individuals chronically infected with HBV or HCV, independent of the stage of the liver disease, will reinforce the necessity of an integrated medical/nutritional/physical education approach in the daily clinical care of patients with CHB and CHC.