The GH-releasing effect of ghrelin,a natural GH secretagogue,is only blunted by the infusion of exogenous somatostatin in humans

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at the serine 3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). Ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion in both animals and humans, showing a synergistic effect with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) but no interaction with synthetic GHS. However, the activity of ghrelin as well as that of non-natural GHS is not fully specific for GH; ghrelin also induces a stimulatory effect on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion, at least in humans. DESIGN: To further clarify the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing activity of this natural GHS, we studied the effects of somatostatin (SS, 2.0 microg/kg/h from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) in seven normal young male volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.6 +/- 2.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effect of SS on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microm/kg i.v. at 0 min) was also studied. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -30 up to +120 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels were assayed after ghrelin administration alone and during SS infusion. RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (hAUC0'-->120' 2695.0 +/- 492.6 microg min/l) was higher (P < 0.01) than that after GHRH (757.1 +/- 44.1 microg min/l). SS infusion almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (177.0 +/- 37.7 microg min/l, P < 0.01); the GH response to ghrelin was inhibited by SS (993.8 +/- 248.5 microg min/l, P < 0.01) but GH levels remained higher (P < 0.05) than with GHRH. Ghrelin induced significant increases in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels and these responses were not modified by SS. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin, a natural GHS-R ligand, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans and this effect is only blunted by an exogenous somatostatin dose which almost abolishes the GH response to GHRH. The stimulatory effect of ghrelin on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion is refractory to exogenous somatostatin, indicating that these effects occur through pathways independent of somatostatinergic influence.     

Interaction between glucagon and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon administration stimulates both somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans, although this happens only if glucagon is administered by the intramuscular route and not by the intravenous route. On the other hand, GH secretagogues (GHS) strongly stimulate GH and also possess ACTH-releasing activity. DESIGN AND METHODS: To clarify the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effects of both glucagon and GHS on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion, we studied the GH, ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon (GLU, 0.017 mg/kg i.m.) and Hexarelin, a peptidyl GHS (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg i.v.) given alone or in combination in 6 normal young volunteers (females, aged 26-32 years, body mass index 19.7-22.5 kg/m). RESULTS: GLU administration elicited a clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-S.E.M.: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3. 3+/-0.7 microg/l, P<0.02), ACTH (11.6+/-3.3 vs 4.1+/-0.3 pmol/l, P<0. 02) and cortisol (613.5+/-65.6 vs 436.9+/-19.3 nmol/l, P<0.05) levels. HEX induced a marked increase in GH levels (55.7+/-19.8 vs 3. 7+/-1.9 microg/l, P<0.005) and also significant ACTH (5.7+/-1.1 vs 3. 4+/-0.6 pmol/l, P<0.01) and cortisol (400.2+/-31.4 vs 363.4+/-32.2 nmol/l, P<0.05) responses. The GH area under the curve (AUC) after HEX was clearly higher than after GLU (1637.3+/-494.0 vs 479.1+/-115. 7 microg/l/120 min, P<0.04) while HEX and GLU coadministration had a true synergistic effect on GH release (3243.8+/-687.5 microg/l/120 min, P<0.02). The ACTH and cortisol AUCs after HEX were lower (P<0. 02) than those after GLU (208.3+/-41.3 vs 426.3+/-80.9 pmol/l/120 min and 18 874.5+/-1626.1 vs 28 338.5+/-2430.7 nmol/l/120 min respectively). The combined administration of HEX and GLU had an effect which was less than additive on both ACTH (564.02+/-76.5 pmol/l/120 min) and cortisol (35 424.6+/-5548.1 nmol/l/120 min) secretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the intramuscular administration of glucagon releases less GH but more ACTH and cortisol than Hexarelin. The combined administration of glucagon and Hexarelin has a true synergistic effect on somatotroph secretion but a less than additive effect on corticotroph secretion; these findings suggest that these stimuli act via different mechanisms to stimulate somatotrophs while they could have a common action on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis.     

Serum ghrelin levels are suppressed in hypopituitary patients following insulin-induced hypoglycaemia irrespective of GH status

OBJECTIVE: Circulating ghrelin is suppressed during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in healthy subjects, but it is unknown whether this is determined by feedback inhibition from counter-regulatory hormones. We therefore investigated the impact of GH and cortisol on ghrelin secretion during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. DESIGN: Serum levels of ghrelin, GH, and cortisol were measured in 41 adult patients with suspected hypopituitarism during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Based on their peak GH response (cut-off level: 3 microg/l), the patients were divided into a GH-sufficient group (GHS) and a GH-deficient group (GHD). RESULTS: The GHS patients (n = 16) were younger (P < 0.01), had lower baseline cortisol levels [255 +/- 37 vs. 372 +/- 38 nmol/l (P = 0.04)], and tended to have a lower body mass index (P = 0.09) as compared to GHD patients (n = 25). By definition, peak GH (microg/l) was higher in GHS patients [15.0 +/- 1.8 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.0001)].The increase in serum cortisol during the ITT (insulin-tolerance test) was higher and occurred later in GHS patients [Cmax (nmol/l): 561 +/- 41 vs. 412 +/- 50 (P = 0.04); Tmax (minutes): 65 +/- 5 vs. 49 +/- 5 (P = 0.03)]. Serum ghrelin levels changed significantly with time during ITT in both groups (P < 0.0001), characterized by a moderate decline during the initial 50-60 min and a return to baseline after 2 h. No significant differences were recorded in AUCghrelin during the ITT between the two groups. No gender differences in ghrelin levels were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Like in healthy subjects serum ghrelin levels are suppressed during an ITT in patients with suspected hypopituitarism. (ii) The suppression of ghrelin was similar in GHD and GHS subjects and was not determined by cortisol. (iii) We hypothesize that insulin rather than hypoglycaemia accounts for ghrelin suppression during an ITT.     

Prandial regulation of ghrelin secretion in humans: does glucagon contribute to the preprandial increase in circulating ghrelin?

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon secretion is stimulated by fasting and inhibited postprandially, a pattern that mimics the secretory profiles of both ghrelin and GH. We thus hypothesized that glucagon may be a determinant of the changes in circulating ghrelin and GH that occur in relation to meals. The objective of the study was to explore this hypothesis by determining the ghrelin and GH response to a bolus of glucagon or saline in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Nine healthy volunteers, mean age 47 years (range 33-58) and body mass index (BMI) 24 kg/m2 (range 20.9-27.6) were recruited and received either 1 mg glucagon (n = 9) or 1 ml saline (n = 6) subcutaneously on separate days between 0800 and 0830 h after an overnight fast. Venous blood was then sampled at 15-min intervals during the first hour, followed by 30-min intervals up to 4 h for glucose, insulin, GH, cortisol, somatostatin and ghrelin. RESULTS: Mean +/- SE basal ghrelin was 213.1 +/- 34.3 pmol/l and decreased significantly by 15 min after glucagon administration to 179.3 +/- 28 pmol/l (P = 0.01), then remaining suppressed relative to the basal value until 240 min after glucagon. Plasma insulin increased from a basal value of 46.7 +/- 7.7 pmol/l to a peak of 327.1 +/- 54.9 pmol/l (P < 0.0001). There was an inverse statistical relationship between the increase in insulin over the first 120 min and the decrease in ghrelin (P = 0.005), while somatostatin, GH and glucose were not significant contributors to the decrease in ghrelin (P > 0.05). Mean +/- SE basal GH was 7.3 +/- 2.9 microg/l and increased by 150 min after glucagon to a peak of 20.5 +/- 6.8 microg/l (P = 0.006). Changes in neither ghrelin nor glucose were related to the increase in GH (P = 0.7). Saline administration did not produce any significant change in ghrelin, insulin or somatostatin although the expected diurnal reduction in cortisol (P < 0.05) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no evidence that glucagon stimulates ghrelin secretion in humans and supports the hypothesis that insulin is a negative regulator of ghrelin secretion in the postprandial state. We did not find a negative relationship between endogenous somatostatin and ghrelin despite earlier reports that exogenously administered somatostatin analogues suppress plasma ghrelin. Finally, glucagon-induced GH secretion is not mediated by an increase in plasma ghrelin.     

Recombinant human IGF-I does not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans

An inhibitory influence of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been hypothesized. In fact, it has been reported that the rhGH (recombinant human GH)-induced IGF-I increase inhibits both cortisol and GH response to MK-0677, a non-peptidyl GH secretagogue in animals. The aim of this study was to further clarify the inhibitory role, if any, of IGF-I on corticotroph function. We studied the effect of rhIGF-I (recombinant human IGF-I; 20 microg/kg s.c. at -180 min) or placebo on the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (human CRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) or hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a peptidyl GHS, in normal young women. The effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to HEX was also studied. The subjects were six normal young women [age: 26-35 yr; body mass index (BMI): 19-23 kg/m2] in their early follicular phase. The results showed that after s.c. rhIGF-I administration, circulating IGF-I levels increased approximately 77%, peaking at -60 min and persisting similar up to +120 min. The mean ACTH, cortisol and GH concentrations did not change from -180 to 0 min when evaluated after both placebo or rhIGF-I. CRH and HEX induced similar ACTH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 47.5+/-10.9 vs 21.3+/-3.0 pg/ml and 30.3+/-6.9 vs 19.2+/-3.8 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.04) and cortisol responses (177.5+/-5.4 vs 109.3+/-10.3 microg/l and 149.4+/-12.3 vs 119.8+/-16.4 microg/l, respectively, p<0.04). RhIGF-I pretreatment did not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (46.0+/-13.8 pg/ml and 181.1+/-16.9 microg/l, respectively) as well as those to HEX (28.8+/-5.0 pg/ml and 144.1+/-16.2 microg/l, respectively). On the other hand, the GH response to HEX was clearly reduced by rhIGF-I (23.9+/-4.7 vs 64.7+/-14.8 microg/l, p<0.05). Our findings show that rhIGF-I-induced increase of circulating IGF-I levels exerts negative feedback action on somatotroph secretion, while it does not modify the corticotroph and the adrenal responsiveness to CRH or hexarelin.     

Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the simplified and standard i.m. glucagon stimulation test (IMGST)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the peak GH and cortisol responses to the simplified and standard i.m. glucagon stimulation test (IMGST) in order to determine whether the use of a simplified form of this test results in a loss of diagnostic utility. PATIENT AND DESIGN: A retrospective study of 35 consecutive patients with pituitary disease who underwent a standard IMGST to measure GH (n = 34) or cortisol (n = 21) reserve at the programmed investigation unit of the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield. MEASUREMENTS: Cortisol, glucose and GH levels were measured at baseline and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 min during the standard IMGST. We used the hormone levels at baseline, 150 and 180 min for the simplified IMGST and compared the cortisol and GH responses achieved. RESULTS: The median (range) peak GH and cortisol responses to simplified and standard IMGST were comparable 4.2 (0.5-47.5) vs 5.4 (0.5-47.5) mU/l (P = 0.75) and 635 (306-1669) vs 647 (306-1669) nmol/l (P = 0.801), respectively. Using the standard 'cut-off' points to assess GH (9 mU/l) or cortisol deficiency (580 nmol/l) there was no significant loss of diagnostic utility (P = 0.98 and P = 1.00, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified and standard IMGST have a similar diagnostic utility. The simplified IMGST could replace the standard IMGST as a screening test for GH and cortisol reserve in pituitary disease. The insulin-induced hypoglycaemia stress test can be reserved for cases in which a second assessment of pituitary reserve is clinically indicated or because of an indeterminate biochemical result.     

Acetylcholine does not play a major role in mediating the endocrine responses to ghrelin,a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor,in humans

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is a 28 amino residue peptide produced predominantly by the stomach with substantially lower amounts deriving from other central and peripheral tissues. Ghrelin is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and possesses a potent GH-releasing activity for which the acylation in serine 3 is essential. Ghrelin also possesses other endocrine and non-endocrine activities reflecting central and peripheral GHS-R distribution and stimulates PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion, has been reported able to induce hyperglycaemia and to decrease insulin levels and has orexigenic activity. Moreover, ghrelin stimulates gastric motility and acid secretion and its action is mediated by acetylcholine which, in turn, is known to play a stimulatory influence on GH, ACTH and insulin secretion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In order to clarify the influence, if any, of acetylcholine on the endocrine activities of ghrelin, we studied the effects of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) and blockade by pirenzepine (PIR, 100 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) on GH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to human acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) in seven normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM): 28.3 +/- 3.1 years; BMI: 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effects of PD and PIR on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) have also been studied. RESULTS: The administration of ghrelin induced a prompt increase in circulating GH levels (hAUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/L) which was markedly higher (P < 0.01) than that elicited by GHRH (966.9 +/- 20.50 microg*min/L). Ghrelin also induced a significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/L) and cortisol levels (15505.1 +/- 796.3 microg*min/L) and a decrease in insulin levels (Delta hAUC: -198.1 +/- 39.2 mU*min/L) which was preceded by an increase in plasma glucose levels (8743.8 +/- 593.0 mg*min/dL). The GH response to GHRH was markedly potentiated by PD (4363.3 +/- 917.3 microg*min/L; P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone). In turn, PD did not modify either the GH response to ghrelin (6564.2 +/- 1753.5 microg*min/L) or its stimulatory effect on PRL and cortisol as well as its effects on insulin and glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by PIR (171.5 +/- 34.7 microg*min/L, P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone) which, in turn, did not significantly modify the GH response to ghrelin (4044.0 +/- 948.8 microg*min/L). PIR also did not modify the effects of ghrelin on PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The endocrine activities of ghrelin are not affected significantly by cholinergic enhancement and muscarinic blockade. Thus, acetylcholine does not play a major role in the endocrine actions of ghrelin. Moreover, as the cholinergic system influences GH secretion via modulation of somatostatin release, the present data agree with the assumption that ghrelin is partially refractory to the influence of somatostatin.     

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.     

Ghrelin does not mediate the somatotroph and corticotroph responses to the stimulatory effect of glucagon or insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in humans

OBJECTIVE: Acylated ghrelin, a gastric peptide, possesses a potent GH- but also significant ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity mediated by the activation of GH secretagogue receptors (GHS-R) at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. The physiological role of ghrelin in the control of somatotroph and corticotroph function is, however, largely unclear. Glucagon is known to induce a clear increase of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels in humans, at least after intramuscular administration. In fact, glucagon is considered to be a classical alternative to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT) for the combined evaluation of the function of GH and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We aimed to clarify whether ghrelin mediate the GH and corticotroph responses to intramuscular glucagon or ITT, which has recently been reported able to induce a surprising ghrelin decrease. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young male subjects [age (mean +/- SD): 29.0 +/- 8.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 21.9 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)]. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied ghrelin, GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose levels after glucagon (GLU; 0.017 mg/kg intramuscularly), ITT (0.1 IU/kg insulin intravenously) or saline administration. RESULTS: Saline infusion was not followed by any significant variation in ghrelin, GH and glucose levels while ACTH and cortisol showed the expected spontaneous morning trend toward a decrease. GLU administration increased (P < 0.01) circulating GH, ACTH and cortisol as well as insulin and glucose levels. ITT induced an obvious increase (P < 0.01) of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels. The ITT-induced increases in GH and ACTH, but not cortisol, levels were higher (P < 0.01) than those after GLU. Circulating ghrelin levels were not modified by GLU. On the other hand, ghrelin levels underwent a transient reduction (P < 0.01) after insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin does not mediate the GH and ACTH responses to glucagon or to the ITT. In fact, ghrelin levels are not modified at all by glucagon and transiently decrease during the ITT. These findings support the assumption that ghrelin does not play a major role in the physiological control of somatotroph and corticotroph function.     

Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.     

Acute effects of ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose disposal rate in gastrectomized patients

CONTEXT: Plasma ghrelin concentration is diminished in gastrectomized patients. Acute ghrelin administration reduces insulin secretion, whereas insulin infusion has been shown to decrease ghrelin levels. Whether ghrelin has any effect on glucose utilization in humans is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to reveal the effect of ghrelin on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in gastrectomized patients. STUDY AND SETTING: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, hospital-based study. PATIENTS: Seven men and three women who all had a previous total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy entered and completed the study. Intervention: Each individual received infusion of saline alone or saline with ghrelin (5.0 pmol/kg.min) during a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2).min) euglycemic clamp on 2 separate days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed glucose disposal rate and concentrations of C-peptide, ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -1, cortisol, leptin, and adiponectin. RESULTS: Glucose disposal rate decreased during ghrelin infusion (control study 8.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.1 mg/kg.min P < 0.001). In experiments with saline infusion, levels of ghrelin (P < 0.001), C-peptide (P < 0.001), glucagon (P < 0.001), adiponectin (P = 0.005), cortisol (P = 0.012), IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001) fell in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. GH concentration maintained at baseline, whereas leptin significantly rose (P < 0.001). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plateau level of ghrelin concentration (6963.6 +/- 212.9 pg/ml) was maintained from 90 min throughout the experiment. GH (P < 0.001) and cortisol (P = 0.04) concentrations rose, whereas C-peptide levels were more suppressed than in the control study (P < 0.001). Other hormones and IGFBPs changed similarly as in the study with saline infusion. CONCLUSION: It appears that ghrelin might be involved in the negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption in gastrectomized patients, at least after acute administration.     

Effects of estrogen and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I on ghrelin secretion in severe undernutrition

Ghrelin is a nutritionally regulated gut peptide that increases with fasting and chronic undernutrition and decreases with food intake. Sex steroid levels change in chronic undernutrition and might signal changes in ghrelin. At the same time, chronic undernutrition is characterized by low IGF-I that might also influence ghrelin, either directly or through changes in the GH axis. Little is known regarding sex steroid regulation of ghrelin and the effects of IGF-I on ghrelin in severe undernutrition. We investigated the effects of sex steroids and IGF-I on ghrelin in 78 female subjects with anorexia nervosa simultaneously randomized to receive estrogen (Ovcon 35, 35 microg ethinyl estradiol, and 0.4 mg norethindrone) as well as recombinant human (rh)IGF-I (30 microg/kg sc twice a day) in a two-by-two factorial model, in which the individual effects of estrogen (E) and rhIGF-I on ghrelin could be determined. Subjects were 24.9 +/- 0.7 (mean +/- sem) yr of age and had low weight (body mass index, 16.7 +/- 0.2 kg/m(2)). At baseline, ghrelin was inversely correlated with body mass index (r = -0.39, P = 0.0005) and IGF-I (r = -0.30, P = 0.01). IGF-I increased significantly more in subjects receiving rhIGF-I alone (Delta 23.0 +/- 5.8 nmol/liter) and rhIGF-I and E (Delta 34.9 +/- 6.3 nmol/liter) compared with subjects receiving E alone (Delta -3.2 +/- 1.9 nmol/liter) or control (C; rhIGF-I placebo and no E) (Delta 0.4 +/- 2.0 nmol/liter) (overall P < 0.0001 by multivariate analysis of variance, P < 0.0001 for rhIGF-I vs. C, P < 0.0001 for rhIGF-I and E vs. C). Ghrelin increased significantly more over 6 months in response to E alone (Delta 150 +/- 86 pg/ml), rhIGF-I alone (Delta 198 +/- 116 pg/ml), and the combination (E and rhIGF-I) (Delta 441 +/- 214 pg/ml) compared with C (Delta -39 +/- 48 pg/ml) (overall P = 0.02 by multivariate analysis of variance, P = 0.01 for E vs. C, P = 0.04 for rhIGF-I vs. C, and P = 0.001 for rhIGF-I and E vs. C). Weight, caloric intake, and morning GH levels did not change significantly between the groups, but the change in ghrelin was inversely related to the change in GH among all subjects (r = -0.27, P = 0.03).Our data demonstrate that, in a model of severe undernutrition, rhIGF-I and E individually increase ghrelin levels. The mechanisms of these effects are unknown and may relate to direct effects on ghrelin or changes in GH. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which rhIGF-I and E increase ghrelin in human physiology.     

Alprazolam (a benzodiazepine activating GABA receptor) reduces the neuroendocrine responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in humans

OBJECTIVE: Alprazolam (ALP), a benzodiazepine-activating GABAergic receptor, possesses clear centrally mediated inhibitory effects on ACTH and cortisol secretion that could reflect an inhibitory influence on CRH- and/or AVP-secreting neurones. An inhibitory effect of ALP on catecholamine release has also been shown while its effect on GH secretion is unclear. To further clarify the neuroendocrine actions of ALP, we studied the ALP effects on the neurohormonal responses to hypoglycaemia in a group of normal subjects. DESIGN: In eight normal subjects [four women and four men, 22-34 years old, body mass index (BMI) 20-25 kg/m2] the ACTH, cortisol, GH, adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA) responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia [ITT, 0.1 UI/kg regular insulin intravenously (i.v.) at 0 min] preceded by placebo or ALP (0.02 mg/kg orally at -90 min) were studied in two sessions at least 10 days apart. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken basely at -90 and 0 min and every 15 min up to +120 min. ACTH, cortisol, GH, A and NA level were assayed at each time point in both sessions. RESULTS: All subjects experienced hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose levels below 2.2 mmol/l). After placebo ITT induced clear-cut increases in ACTH (peak vs. baseline, mean +/- SEM: 27.9 +/- 3.9 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.5 pmol/l), cortisol (438.1 +/- 32.0 vs. 237.7 +/- 19.3 nmol/l) and GH (38.1 +/- 9.7 vs. 5.7 +/- 2.0 micro g/l) levels (P < 0.05). Marked increase in A (6627.2 +/- 116.7 vs. 263.7 +/- 71.4 pmol/l) and NA (3.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.0 nmol/l) levels were also recorded (P < 0.05). Pretreatment with ALP significantly inhibited the ACTH peak response to ITT (17.8 +/- 5.0 pmol/l, P < 0.05), while the cortisol response showed a non significant reduction (342.1 +/- 38.7 nmol/l). ALP also significantly reduced the GH (21.7 +/- 4.7 micro g/l, P < 0.02) and A (3828.0 +/- 1400.7 pmol/l, P < 0.02) responses to ITT. On the contrary, ALP lowered basal NA levels (P < 0.05) but did not significantly affect its response to ITT (2.2 +/- 1.2 nmol/l). Glucose changes induced by ITT were not modified by ALP. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that GABAergic activation by alprazolam significantly inhibits the neuroendocrine and adrenomedullary responses to hypoglycaemia.     

Glucagon administration elicits blunted GH but exaggerated ACTH response in obesity

Reduction in both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in obesity has been clearly demonstrated. Mild hyperactivity of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been also reported. Glucagon, at least after im administration, induces clear increase in either GH or ACTH and F levels but its effect on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in obesity has never been studied. In 7 patients with abdominal obesity (OB, aged 24-42 yr, BMI: 29.1-43.9 kg/m2, waist/hip ratio [WHR]: 0.86-1.00) we studied the GH, ACTH and F responses to the im administration of glucagon (0.017 mg/kg at 0 min). The results in OB were compared with those in a group of 6 age-matched controls normal subjects (Ns aged 26-32 yr, BMI 19.7-22.5 kg/m2). In Ns glucagon administration induced clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3.3+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.02), and ACTH (52.9+/-15.2 vs 19.0+/-1.5 pg/ml, p<0.02) levels which peaked at +150 and +165 min, respectively. Increase in F levels (222.3+/-23.8 vs 158.3+/-7.0 ng/ml, p<0.05) was also recorded but peaked at +180 min. In OB glucagon administration induced GH response (7.4+/-2.3 vs 0.8+/-0.6 microg/l) lower (p<0.05) than that recorded in Ns; when the GH responses were evaluated by co-variance analysis, a significant difference between the 2 groups was recorded in term of peaks but not of AUCs. On the other hand, the ACTH response to glucagon in OB was higher than that in Ns (11452.6+/-2447.7 vs 4892.2+/-719.4 pg/ml x min, p<0.05). The F response to glucagon in OB and Ns was, however, similar (24057.9+/-4109.1 vs 29835.9+/-1566.0 ng/ml x min). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in obese patients the im administration of glucagon elicits blunted GH response but exaggerated ACTH increase which is uncoupled with the adrenal response. These findings agree with the existence of concomitant GH insufficiency and altered corticotroph function in obesity.     

ACUTE DEXAMETHASONE SUPPRESSION OF ACTH SECRETION STIMULATED BY HUMAN CORTICOTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE, AVP AND HYPOGLYCAEMIA

In order to obtain more insight into the mechanisms regulating endogenous ACTH secretion in humans we studied the inhibitory effect of acute i.v. dexamethasone administration on ACTH release under various conditions. Six male volunteers were subjected to six different protocols. After combined i.v. injection of 100 micrograms corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) and 100 micrograms growth hormone releasing hormone (GRH) there was the expected rise in ACTH (area under the curve, 1053 +/- 204 (SE) (pmol/l) min) and cortisol (59788 +/- 10098 (nmol/l) min) rise which was suppressed by prior i.v. injection of 2 mg dexamethasone (ACTH: 444 +/- 63 (pmol/l) min; cortisol: 28528 +/- 2152 (nmol/l) min). Insulin hypoglycaemia (IH) led to a more pronounced ACTH and cortisol rise compared with CRH (6307 +/- 817 (pmol/l) min and 82080 +/- 21934 (nmol/l) min, respectively) which was not completely suppressed by prior pretreatment with dexamethasone (ACTH, 580 +/- 103 (pmol/l) min; cortisol: 55649 +/- 5821 (nmol/l) min). Combined AVP/CRH injection (10 IU/100 micrograms) after pretreatment with dexamethasone (344 +/- 41 (pmol/l) min for ACTH; 32832 +/- 3173 (nmol/l) min for cortisol) could not reproduce the ACTH secretion following IH after pretreatment with dexamethasone (579 +/- 103 (pmol/l) min for ACTH and 55649 +/- 5821 (nmol/l) min for cortisol). In all subjects a saline control with 2 mg dexamethasone was performed. These findings confirm the acute inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on CRH-stimulated ACTH secretion. Since CRH-induced ACTH secretion is almost completely abolished by administration of dexamethasone the ACTH rise following IH after dexamethasone can not be mediated by endogenous CRH alone. Moreover, since the addition of AVP to CRH (after dexamethasone suppression) could not reproduce the ACTH rise during IH after dexamethasone pretreatment, an additional, yet unknown factor stimulating ACTH secretion may be involved. In the same protocols, no significant difference could be observed comparing IH and GRH induced GH secretion (4948 +/- 1172 (mU/l) min vs 3596 +/- 820 (mU/l) min, NS); furthermore, in contrast to results obtained by chronic steroid administration, acute i.v. dexamethasone pretreatment did not affect IH or GRH-induced GH secretion (4110 +/- 666 (mU/l) min vs 2916 +/- 462 (mU/l) min, NS). The GRH-stimulated GH secretion (3596 +/- 820 (mU/l) min) was not suppressed by prior intravenous treatment with dexamethasone (2916 +/- 504 (mU/l) min, NS).     

Effects of glucose,free fatty acids or arginine load on the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester in serine-3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion. In humans, ghrelin is more potent than growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and non-natural GHS such as hexarelin. Moreover, ghrelin shows a true synergism with GHRH, has no interaction with hexarelin and, similarly to non-natural GHS, is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of exogenous somatostatin (SS). Despite this evidence, the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect of ghrelin in humans have not been fully clarified. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.9 +/- 3.1 year; body mass index 22.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all subjects we studied the effects of glucose (OGTT, 100 g oral glucose at -45 min) or free fatty acids (FFA) load [lipid-heparin emulsion, Li-He, Intralipid 10% 250 ml + heparin 2500 U i.v. from -30 to +120 min] as well as of arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused from 0 to +30 min) on the GH response to human ghrelin (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min) administration. These results were compared with those obtained by studying the effects of OGTT, Li-He and ARG on the GH response to GHRH-29 (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min). RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (auc 5452.4 +/- 991.3 micro g/l/h) was higher (P < 0.05) than that after GHRH (1519.4 +/- 93.3 micro g/l/h). The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by OGTT (450.7 +/- 81.1 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) and almost abolished by Li-He (230.0 +/- 63.6 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) while was markedly potentiated by ARG (2520.4 +/- 425.8 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05). The GH response to GHRH + ARG, however, was lower (P < 0.05) than that to ghrelin alone. The GH response to ghrelin was blunted by OGTT (2153.1 +/- 781.9 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) as well as by Li-He (3158.8 +/- 426.7 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) but these responses remained higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH alone. On the other hand, ARG did not modify the GH response to ghrelin (6324.3 +/- 1275.5 micro g/l/h). For GH 1 micro g/l = 2 mU/l. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, ghrelin exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion which is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of both glucose and FFA load and is not enhanced by ARG. These factors almost abolish and potentiate, respectively, the GH response to GHRH, at least partially, via modulation of hypothalamic SS release. Thus, our findings agree with the hypothesis that ghrelin as well as non-natural GHS acts, at least partially, by antagonizing SS activity.     

Growth hormone, cortisol, and glucagon concentrations during plasma free fatty acid depression: different effects of nicotinic acid and an adenosine derivative (BM 11.189)

Two chemically unrelated inhibitors of lipolysis were used in order to differentiate between the effect of FFA depression and a possible FFA-unrelated drug effect, respectively, on the plasma concentrations of GH, cortisol, and glucagon. Saline infusion served as a control experiment. In eight healthy male volunteers, a similar FFA depression by either iv infusion of nicotinic acid (3-pyridine-carboxylic acid, NA) or oral intake of an adenosine derivative, N(6)-allyl-N(6)-cyclohexyl-adenosine (AD-D), was followed by a significant GH increase (to 22.1 +/- 6.2 and 9.6 +/- 2.9 ng/ml at 240 and 270 min, respectively). Due to the large scatter of the GH concentrations during NA infusion, these responses were not significantly different. No GH increase occurred when the FFA depression was prevented by addition of a lipid infusion. In contrast, plasma cortisol and glucagon both increased significantly (by 107.4 micrograms/liter at 270 min and by 48.4 pg/ml at 60 min, respectively) during NA- but not during AD-D-induced FFA depression. Addition of the lipid infusion abolished the cortisol increase during NA infusion but had no influence on basal cortisol concentrations during AD-D intake. It lowered glucagon to values slightly below basal concentrations when added to the NA infusion and more markedly during AD-D administration. The results provide evidence that 1) depression of plasma FFA per se stimulates the secretion of GH, and 2) the increase of cortisol and glucagon during NA infusion is probably unrelated to the FFA depression. Hence, the stimulatory effect of FFA lack on glucagon secretion needs to be reconsidered.     

Acute effects of ghrelin administration on glucose and lipid metabolism

CONTEXT: Ghrelin infusion increases plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acids, but it is uncertain whether this is secondary to the concomitant release of GH. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study direct effects of ghrelin on substrate metabolism. DESIGN: This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled two-period crossover study. SETTING: The study was performed in a university clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy men aged 27.2 +/- 0.9 yr with a body mass index of 23.4 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2) were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects received infusion of ghrelin (5 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or placebo for 5 h together with a pancreatic clamp (somatostatin 330 microg x h(-1), insulin 0.1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1), GH 2 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1), and glucagon 0.5 ng.kg(-1) x min(-1)). A hyperinsulinemic (0.6 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) euglycemic clamp was performed during the final 2 h of each infusion. RESULTS: Basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal decreased with ghrelin [basal: 1.9 +/- 0.1 (ghrelin) vs. 2.3 +/- 0.1 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.03; clamp: 3.9 +/- 0.6 (ghrelin) vs. 6.1 +/- 0.5 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.02], whereas endogenous glucose production was similar. Glucose infusion rate during the clamp was reduced by ghrelin [4.0 +/- 0.7 (ghrelin) vs. 6.9 +/- 0.9 mg.kg(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.007], whereas nonesterified fatty acid flux increased [131 +/- 26 (ghrelin) vs. 69 +/- 5 micromol/min; P = 0.048] in the basal period. Regional lipolysis (skeletal muscle, sc fat) increased insignificantly with ghrelin infusion. Energy expenditure during the clamp decreased after ghrelin infusion [1539 +/- 28 (ghrelin) vs. 1608 +/- 32 kcal/24 h; P = 0.048], but the respiratory quotient did not differ. Minor but significant elevations in serum levels of GH and cortisol were observed after ghrelin infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of exogenous ghrelin causes insulin resistance in muscle and stimulates lipolysis; these effects are likely to be direct, although a small contribution of GH and cortisol cannot be excluded.     

Serum ghrelin levels in acromegaly: effects of surgical and long-acting octreotide therapy

The orexigenic peptide, ghrelin, is regulated by acute and chronic nutritional state. Although exogenously administered ghrelin stimulates pituitary GH secretion, little is known about the role of ghrelin in endogenous GH secretion or how high GH and IGF-I levels in acromegaly could affect ghrelin secretion and vice versa. Therefore, we evaluated fasting and post oral glucose tolerance test serum ghrelin levels in 19 patients with active acromegaly at baseline and after either surgery in 9 of these or administration of long-acting octreotide (Sandostatin LAR) in the other 10 patients. After surgical cure, fasting ghrelin rose from 312 +/- 56 pg/ml to 548 +/- 97 pg/ml (P = 0.013). Fasting serum ghrelin levels were higher in all patients after surgery and ranged between 112% and 349% of presurgery levels. Ghrelin levels fell significantly during long-acting octreotide therapy from 447 +/- 34 pg/ml to 206 +/- 15 pg/ml (P < 0.0001); ghrelin levels on octreotide ranged between 26% and 70% of baseline levels. Serum ghrelin levels were suppressed significantly during the oral glucose tolerance test in both groups. Pretherapy ghrelin levels correlated negatively with serum insulin levels (r = -0.494; P = 0.03) and insulin resistance as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment score (r = -0.573; P = 0.01). In patients without diabetes mellitus, serum insulin levels in the surgical group were 19.7 +/- 5.4 microU/ml before surgery and fell to 9.7 +/- 0.93 microU/ml after surgery (P = 0.05); levels in the octreotide group were 13.9 +/- 2.8 microU/ml before and fell to 11.2 +/- 2.8 microU/ml on octreotide (P = 0.03). Pretherapy ghrelin levels did not correlate with weight or body mass index, but after therapy in the surgery group ghrelin correlated negatively with weight (r = -0.823, P = 0.012) as has been demonstrated by others in healthy subjects. Ghrelin secretion is dysregulated in active acromegaly; lowered serum levels of ghrelin in active acromegaly rise along with the postsurgery normalization of GH and IGF-I and improved insulin resistance. In contrast to surgical therapy, long-acting octreotide therapy persistently suppressed serum ghrelin levels. It remains to be determined whether altered circulating ghrelin concentrations could impact on body composition changes in acromegaly.     

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.