Disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer: detection, characterization and clinical relevance

Hematogenous distant metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related death in breast cancer and other solid tumors. By applying sensitive immunocytochemical or molecular assays, disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow can be detected in 20-40% of breast cancer patients without any clinical or even histopathological signs of metastasis. The detection of DTCs provides prognostic information and might help to identify patients who need adjuvant therapy, and to monitor the efficacy of adjuvant therapy. Within the last few years, various efforts have led to an increased sensitivity in the detection of DTC. This review will summarize the most important methods for DTC detection in bone marrow and for circulating tumor cells in the blood of breast cancer patients, the clinical relevance of DTCs and, finally, provide an outlook on clinical implications.     

Insights into minimal residual disease in cancer patients: Implications for anti-cancer therapies

Tumor cell dissemination appears even in patients with small solid tumors, and bone marrow (BM) is a common homing organ for disseminated tumor cells (DTC) derived from various types of primary epithelial tumors. Tumor cells are frequently detected in the BM of cancer patients without any clinical or even histopathological signs of overt metastases. It is crucial, however, to improve and standardize methods for the detection of DTC.The characterization of DTC has shed new light on the process underlying early tumor cell dissemination and metastatic progression in cancer patients. Characterization of DTC should help to identify novel targets for biological therapies aimed at preventing metastatic relapse and to monitor the efficacy of these therapies. Evidence has emerged that the detection of DTC and circulating tumor cells (CTC) in blood may provide important prognostic information and, in addition, might help to monitor the efficacy of therapy.In this article, we summarize the clinical background and the technical aspects of current methods used for the detection and characterization of DTC in BM and CTC in blood, with a special focus on breast cancer.     

Prognosis of women with stage IV breast cancer depends on detection of circulating tumor cells rather than disseminated tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: At metastatic relapse, detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood is predictive of poor survival of breast cancer patients. Detection of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow (BM) is an independent prognostic factor in early breast cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of DTC detection in the BM of metastatic breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BM aspirates from 138 patients were screened for DTC with the pancytokeratin mAb A45-B/B3, according to the ISHAGE classification. One hundred and ten patients (80%) were enrolled before first-line treatment. Thirty-seven patients were simultaneously screened for CTC in the blood. RESULTS: DTC detection rate in the BM was 59%. DTC were associated with bone metastasis (P = 0.0001), but not with a poorer overall survival. Adverse significant prognostic factors were hormone receptor negativity (P = 0.0004) and more than one line of chemotherapy (P = 0.002). CTC detection in the subgroup of 37 metastatic patients was associated with shorter survival (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of CTC but not BM DTC had a prognostic significance in stage IV breast cancer patients. CTC in blood are a more reliable and a less invasive tool to evaluate prognostic and monitor tumor response in this metastatic setting.     

Minimal residual disease and circulating tumor cells in breast cancer

Tumor cell dissemination in bone marrow or other organs is thought to represent an important step in the metastatic process. The detection of bone marrow disseminated tumor cells is associated with worse outcome in early breast cancer. Moreover, the detection of peripheral blood circulating tumor cells is an adverse prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer, and emerging data suggest that this is also true for early disease. Beyond enumeration, the characterization of these cells has the potential to improve risk assessment, treatment selection and monitoring, and the development of novel therapeutic agents, and to advance our understanding of the biology of metastasis.     

Circulating tumor cells and bone marrow micrometastasis

Sensitive immunocytochemical and molecular assays allow the detection of single circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the peripheral blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow as a common and easily accessible homing organ for cells released by epithelial tumors of various origins. The results obtained thus far have provided direct evidence that tumor cell dissemination starts already early during tumor development and progression. Tumor cells are frequently detected in the blood and bone marrow of cancer patients without clinical or even histopathologic signs of metastasis. The detection of DTC and CTC yields important prognostic information and might help to tailor systemic therapies to the individual needs of a cancer patient. In the present review, we provide a critical review of (a) the current methods used for detection of CTC/DTC and (b) data on the molecular characterization of CTC/DTC with a particular emphasis on tumor dormancy, cancer stem cell theory, and novel targets for biological therapies; and we pinpoint to (c) critical issues that need to be addressed to establish CTC/DTC measurements in clinical practice.     

Detection and clinical implications of early systemic tumor cell dissemination in breast cancer.

Blood-borne distant metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related death in breast cancer. The onset of this fundamental process can now be assessed in cancer patients using ultrasensitive immunocytochemical and molecular assays able to detect even single metastatic cells. Analyses of bone marrow (BM) samples show that disseminated cells are present in 20-40% of primary breast cancer patients without any clinical or histopathological signs of metastasis. The common homing of circulating breast cancer cells in BM is indicative for systemic tumor cell spread and predictive for growth of overt metastases in relevant organ sites such as bone, lung, or liver. Recent clinical studies involving more than 3000 breast cancer patients demonstrated that the presence of tumor cells in BM at primary diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable clinical outcome. To date, sampling of BM, however, is not a routine procedure in clinical management of breast cancer patients. Therefore, several research groups have developed sensitive assays for detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. Studies evaluating the clinical relevance of these blood assays are ongoing. Here, we will review the existing tumor cell assays and discuss their current clinical relevance and perspectives for the clinical management of breast cancer patients.     

Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: correlation to bone marrow micrometastases, heterogeneous response to systemic therapy and low proliferative activity.

PURPOSE: The incidence and biological characteristics of circulating tumor cells in the blood of patients with breast cancer were examined and subgroups were evaluated in the context of systemic treatment and the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Circulating tumor cells were isolated from the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer using a gradient system designed for the enrichment of circulating tumor cells (OncoQuick). Circulating tumor cells were identified with the anti-cytokeratin antibody, A45-B/B3. In subsets of patients, expression of the proliferation-associated Ki-67 antigen in circulating tumor cells and the concomitant presence of micrometastases in bone marrow were examined. RESULTS: In patients with primary breast cancer (stage M(0)), circulating tumor cells were detected in 5 of 60 patients (8.3%) after surgery and before initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy; a positive correlation to the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow was observed (P = 0.030, n = 53). During the course of adjuvant chemotherapy, repeated analysis of 20 M(0) patients revealed the occurrence of circulating tumor cells in 7 of 16 patients that were initially negative. Patients with metastatic disease (stage M(1)) showed circulating tumor cells in 25 of 63 cases (39.7%, P < 0.0001 as compared with M(0) patients), and a positive finding was correlated with elevated concentrations of the serum tumor marker CA15.3 (P = 0.0093). Performing repeated analysis in a subgroup of 25 M(1) patients, circulating tumor cells were found more frequently in patients with progressive disease than in patients with stable disease or remission (87.5% versus 43.8% of patients with circulating tumor cells, respectively; P = 0.047). Independent of the disease-stage, none of the 47 patients examined for the proliferative status of their circulating tumor cells showed coexpression of Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating tumor cells seem to be nonproliferating cells that persist during chemotherapy. Circulating tumor cell detection is linked to disease progression and elevated tumor marker concentrations in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Clinical relevance and biology of circulating tumor cells

Most breast cancer patients die due to metastases, and the early onset of this multistep process is usually missed by current tumor staging modalities. Therefore, ultrasensitive techniques have been developed to enable the enrichment, detection, isolation and characterization of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow and circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. There is increasing evidence that the presence of these cells is associated with an unfavorable prognosis related to metastatic progression in the bone and other organs. This review focuses on investigations regarding the biology and clinical relevance of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.     

Clinical significance of immunocytochemical detection of tumor cells using digital microscopy in peripheral blood and bone marrow of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The presence of tumor cells in bone marrow has been reported to represent an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer, but the clinical significance of circulating cells in peripheral blood is less well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of identifying cytokeratin (CK)-expressing cells in peripheral blood with an automat-assisted immunohistochemical detection system and to compare it with detection of tumor cells in bone marrow samples. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cytospun Ficoll fractions of peripheral blood and bone marrow were obtained simultaneously in 114 breast cancer patients at different stages of the disease (I to IV) before treatment with chemotherapy. The pancytokeratin (CK) monoclonal antibody A45-B/B3 (anti-CKs 8, 18, and 19) was used for epithelial cell detection. Immunostained cells were detected by an automated cellular imaging system (ChromaVision Medical System). RESULTS: CK+ cells were detected in 28 (24.5%) patients in blood and in 67 (59%) patients in bone marrow. Twenty-six (93%) patients with CK-positive cells in blood also had positive bone marrow (P < 0.001). Positive cells were detected in peripheral blood in 3/39 (7.5%) operable breast cancers (stage I/II), 9 of 36 (25%) locally advanced breast cancers (stage III), and 16 of 39 (41%) patients with metastatic disease (stage IV; P = 0.017). In the subgroup of nonmetastatic patients (n = 75), prognostic factors for poor disease-free survival were: absence of estrogen receptor; presence of CK+ cells in bone marrow (P = 0.012); clinical nodal involvement; large tumor size (T4); and presence of tumor emboli. Presence of circulating CK+ cells in the peripheral blood was not statistically correlated with disease-free survival. On multivariate analysis, independent indicators for disease-free survival were: absence of estrogen receptor (P = 0.043) and presence of CK+ cells in bone marrow (P = 0.076). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of circulating epithelial cells as a prognostic factor is not supported by the present data, especially in comparison with tumor cells in the bone marrow. However, this method of detection may be useful to monitor the efficacy of treatment in advanced or metastatic breast cancer.     

Adoptive immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: present and future

Breast cancer is a systemic disease with a primarily local component. Besides surgical resection and irradiation of the locoregional tumor setting, central therapeutic aim is the elimination of disseminated micrometastatic tumor cells using cytostatic and/or hormonal treatment. Nevertheless, in the course of time a majority of patients suffer from systemic recurrence in the form of distant metastases. Intriguingly, in this connection, intratumoral cytotoxic T lymphocytes might serve as independent predictors of treatment efficacy and clinical outcome. Loss of immune balance (tumor dormancy) during intensive cross talk between T cells and tumor cells in the bone marrow microenvironment is suggested one reason for distant metastatic relapse. In this clinical context, further supportive therapies become increasingly attractive, taking immunological features of breast cancer cells into special account. The present review aims to dissect bone marrow-derived cellular antitumor immune responses and translational immunologic treatment options regarding their actual relevance to patients’ clinical benefit and their future directions in breast cancer management.     

Recent translational research: circulating tumor cells in breast cancer patients

In breast cancer patients, hematogenous tumor cell dissemination can be detected, even at the single cell level, by applying immunocytochemical and molecular assays. Various methods for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood have been described. Results from recently reported studies suggest that circulating tumor cell levels may serve as a prognostic marker and for the early assessment of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, in early-stage breast cancer, the impact of circulating tumor cells is less well established than the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow; several clinical studies have demonstrated that cells of the latter type are an independent prognostic factor at primary diagnosis. In this article we briefly summarize recent studies examining the presence of circulating tumor cells in the blood and discuss further clinical applications.     

Bone marrow micrometastases and circulating tumor cells: current aspects and future perspectives

Early tumor cell dissemination at the single-cell level can be revealed in patients with breast cancer by using sensitive immunocytochemical and molecular assays. Recent clinical studies involving more than 4000 breast cancer patients demonstrated that the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow at primary diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor. In addition, various assays for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood have recently been developed and some studies also suggest a potential clinical relevance of this measure. These findings provide the basis for the potential use of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow or blood as markers for the early assessment of therapeutic response in prospective clinical trials.     

Micrometastatic bone marrow involvement: detection and prognostic significance

The present review focuses on the methodology and clinical significance of new diagnostic approaches to identify individual cancer cells present in bone marrow, both as a frequent site of metastasis formation and an indicator organ for hematogenous tumor cell dissemination. The steadily increasing number of studies on this issue is characterized by considerable methodological variations of important variables, such as the size of the study population, and the reliability of monoclonal antibodies used for tumor cell detection. Emerging data indicate that this disturbing heterogeneity might be overcome by the use of reliable and specific anti-cytokeratin antibodies (for example, A45-B/B3) as, for the time, standard markers for the detection of micrometastatic tumor cells in bone marrow. Prospective clinical studies have shown that immunoassays based on anti-CK antibodies identify patients' subgroups with a poor clinical prognosis with regard to early metastasis manifestation and reduced overall survival in various epithelial tumor entities, including breast, colon, rectum, stomach, esophagus, prostate, renal, bladder, and non-small cell lung cancer. The immunocytochemical assays may be therefore used to improve tumor staging with potential consequences for adjuvant therapy, because disseminated cells appeared to be dormant, non-cycling (for example Ki-67 antigen-negative) cells, suggesting a resistance to cell-cycle dependent therapy, such as chemotherapy. Therefore, cell-cycle independent antibody-based immunotherapy might be an interesting option to complement chemotherapy. Another promising clinical application is monitoring the response of micrometastatic cells to adjuvant therapies, which, at present, can only be assessed retrospectively after an extended period of clinical follow-up. The outlined current strategies for detection and characterization of cancer micrometastasis might help to design and control new therapeutic strategies for secondary prevention of metastatic relapse in patients with operable primary carcinomas.     

Bone marrow and lymph node assessment for minimal residual disease in patients with breast cancer

The immunocytological detection of disseminated epithelial cells in bone marrow in patients with breast cancer has been performed at many hospitals and institutes since the early 1980s. Despite numerous publications in this field, it has not been possible to standardize the method and establish the 'ideal' antibody, either nationally or internationally. Molecular biological methods using PCR technology could extend the diagnostic spectrum. However, one of the major problems in breast cancer is the lack of a disease-specific marker gene. As a result, immunocytology is still the standard procedure for tumour cell detection.The detection of disseminated single cells in bone marrow in primary breast cancer (also known as minimal residual disease) is a new prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival. This has been demonstrated in two large (N > 300) groups and several small to medium groups (N = 50-300). As a marker of dissemination in a target organ for metastasis this prognostic factor corresponds much more closely to the tendency of breast cancer to early haematogenic spread. Tumour cell detection may predict the course of the disease better than the axillary lymph node status. Bone marrow aspiration and detection of disseminated cells might replace lymph node dissection, at least in those patients with small tumours and no clinical signs of lymph node involvement. This strategy will soon be investigated in appropriate studies. Another possible clinical use might be in deciding on whether or not to give adjuvant systemic therapy to node-negative patients. Patients with positive tumour cell detection are at a higher risk of subsequent metastasis, even if the axillary nodes are histologically normal.The immunohistological or molecular biological detection of tumour cells in axillary lymph nodes might also be very useful, now that it has been shown that a considerable subset of patients determined to be node-negative by means of conventional methods, are positive according to these new techniques. These methods could be a useful supplement to sentinel node biopsy. A further potential use of this method is in monitoring therapy with new treatment modalities such as gene therapy and immunotherapy. Repeated bone marrow aspiration can provide information on the success of therapy in minimal residual disease (cytoreduction). Immunocytochemical investigation of individual cells may be useful in studying the pathogenesis of metastasis, in particular in the skeleton. Phenotyping of cells might allow statements to be made on the metastatic potential of cells and the question of cell dormancy. It remains to be hoped that this aspect of minimal residual disease will be granted more attention in future.     

Significance of micrometastasis in bone marrow and blood of operable breast cancer patients: research tool or clinical application?

Approximately 25% of breast cancer patients without lymph node metastases develop systemic relapse. A growing body of data supports the notion that hematogenous dissemination of breast cancer cells occurs independently of lymphatic spread of disease; however, current clinical practice does not involve routine analysis of circulating or disseminated cells. Recent studies have documented that both circulating tumor cells (CTCs) within the blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow can be identified using a variety of techniques. It is now clear that the presence of DTCs correlates with subsequent development of clinically evident bone metastases, and a worse outcome from breast cancer. While there are data identifying prognostic significance of CTCs in patients with metastatic breast cancer, there are few data regarding CTCs in operable patients. Factors such as presence of a cancer stem cell phenotype and/or certain microenvironmental conditions are involved in the establishment of distant metastases from a primary breast cancer, emphasizing the need for further studies within this area. The purpose of this report is to review the data regarding CTCs and DTCs in patients with operable breast cancer.     

Significance of micrometastasis in bone marrow and blood of operable breast cancer patients: research tool or clinical application?

Approximately 25% of breast cancer patients without lymph node metastases develop systemic relapse. A growing body of data supports the notion that hematogenous dissemination of breast cancer cells occurs independently of lymphatic spread of disease; however, current clinical practice does not involve routine analysis of circulating or disseminated cells. Recent studies have documented that both circulating tumor cells (CTCs) within the blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow can be identified using a variety of techniques. It is now clear that the presence of DTCs correlates with subsequent development of clinically evident bone metastases, and a worse outcome from breast cancer. While there are data identifying prognostic significance of CTCs in patients with metastatic breast cancer, there are few data regarding CTCs in operable patients. Factors such as presence of a cancer stem cell phenotype and/or certain microenvironmental conditions are involved in the establishment of distant metastases from a primary breast cancer, emphasizing the need for further studies within this area. The purpose of this report is to review the data regarding CTCs and DTCs in patients with operable breast cancer.     

Expression of stem cell and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in primary breast cancer patients with circulating tumor cells

Introduction  

The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in breast cancer might be associated with stem cell-like tumor cells which have been suggested to be the active source of metastatic spread in primary tumors. Furthermore, to be able to disseminate and metastasize, CTC must be able to perform epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We studied the expression of three EMT markers and the stem cell marker ALDH1 in CTC from 502 primary breast cancer patients. Data were correlated with the presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM) and with clinicopathological data of the patients.     

New insights into the mechanisms of organ-specific breast cancer metastasis

Despite the substantial advances obtained in the treatment of localized malignancies, metastatic disease still lacks effective treatment and remains the primary cause of cancer mortality, including in breast cancer. Thus, in order to improve the survival of cancer patients it is necessary to effectively improve prevention or treatment of metastasis. To achieve this goal, complementary strategies can be envisaged: the first one is the eradication of established metastases by adding novel modalities to current treatments, such as immunotherapy or targeted therapies. A second one is to prevent tumor cell dissemination to secondary organs by targeting specific steps governing the metastatic cascade and organ-specific tropism. A third one is to block the colonization of secondary organs and subsequent cancer cell growth by impinging on the ability of disseminated cancer cells to adapt to the novel microenvironment. To obtain optimal results it might be necessary to combine these strategies. The development of therapeutic approaches aimed at preventing dissemination and organ colonization requires a deeper understanding of the specific genetic events occurring in cancer cells and of the host responses that co-operate to promote metastasis formation. Recent developments in the field disclosed novel mechanisms of metastasis. In particular the crosstalk between disseminated cancer cells and the host microenvironment is emerging as a critical determinant of metastasis. The identification of tissue-specific signals involved in metastatic progression will open the way to new therapeutic strategies. Here, we will review recent progress in the field, with particular emphasis on the mechanisms of organ specific dissemination and colonization of breast cancer.     

microRNAs, Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Breast Cancer Metastasis

The failed outcome of autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer opens the field for investigations. This is particularly important because the bone marrow could be a major source of cancer cells during tertiary metastasis. This review discusses subsets of breast cancer cells, including those that enter the bone marrow at an early period of disease development, perhaps prior to clinical detection. This population of cells evades chemotherapeutic damage even at high doses. An understanding of this population might be crucial for the success of bone marrow transplants for metastatic breast cancer and for the eradication of cancer cells in bone marrow. In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) between bone marrow stroma and breast cancer cells. This review discusses GJIC in cancer metastasis, facilitating roles of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In addition, the review addresses potential roles for miRNAs, including those already linked to cancer biology. The literature on MSCs is growing and their links to metastasis are beginning to be significant leads for the development of new drug targets for breast cancer. In summary, this review discusses interactions among GJIC, miRNAs and MSCs as future consideration for the development of cancer therapies.