Validation of the Korean version of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory as a screening measure to detect adolescents at ultra‐high risk for psychosis

Aim: No validated self‐report scale is available for use as a screening tool to detect non‐help‐seeking adolescents at ultra‐high risk (UHR) for psychosis in a community setting. The study aims to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (K‐ESI) for assessing adolescents at UHR for psychosis in a community setting. Methods: In the first study, to confirm the reliability and discriminant validity of the K‐ESI, community sample (782 adolescents, 281 young adults, 122 early and middle‐aged adults) and outpatients with schizophrenia (109) were recruited. A single cross‐sectional survey was performed using the K‐ESI for the community sample and the K‐ESI and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for patients. In the second study, the Korean version of Youth Self Report (K‐YSR) was administered initially to 1002 students. Of the 217 students whose scores were equal to or higher than the cut‐off point of the K‐YSR, 120 who agreed to an in‐depth evaluation were interviewed using the Comprehensive Assessment of At‐Risk Mental States to confirm the predictive validity of the K‐ESI. Results: The K‐ESI showed good internal consistency and excellent test–retest reliability and discriminant validity. However, the factor structure in adolescents was substantially different from that of the original ESI. The best cut‐off point for the K‐ESI to identify UHR adolescents was 29, with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 70%. Conclusion: The results revealed that the K‐ESI can be used as a valid and reliable instrument to identify adolescents at UHR for psychosis in a community setting.     

Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States

OBJECTIVE: Recognizing the prodrome of a first psychotic episode prospectively creates the opportunity of intervention, which could delay, ameliorate or even prevent onset. Valid criteria and a reliable methodology for identifying possible prodromes are needed. This paper describes an instrument, the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), which has been designed for such a purpose. It has two functions: (i) to assess psychopathology thought to indicate imminent development of a first-episode psychotic disorder; and (ii) to determine if an individual meets criteria for being at ultra high risk (UHR) for onset of first psychotic disorder. This paper describes the pilot evaluation of the CAARMS. METHOD: Several methodologies were used to test the CAARMS. First, CAARMS scores in a group of UHR young people and the association between CAARMS scores and the risk of transition to psychotic disorder, were analysed. Second, CAARMS scores in a UHR group were compared to a control group. To assess concurrent validity, CAARMS-defined UHR criteria were compared to the existing criteria for identifying the UHR cohort. To assess predictive validity, the CAARMS-defined UHR criteria were applied to a sample of 150 non-psychotic help-seekers and rates of onset of psychotic disorder at 6-month follow-up determined for the CAARMS-positive (i.e. met UHR criteria) group and the CAARMS-negative (i.e. did not meet UHR criteria) group. The inter-rater reliability of the CAARMS was assessed by using pairs of raters. RESULTS: High CAARMS score in the UHR group was significantly associated with onset of psychotic disorder. The control group had significantly lower CAARMS scores than the UHR group. The UHR criteria assessed by the CAARMS identified a similar group to the criteria measured by existing methodology. In the sample of non-psychotic help-seekers those who were CAARMS-positive were at significantly increased risk of onset of psychotic disorder compared to those who were CAARMS-negative (relative risk of 12.44 (95% CI = 1.5-103.41, p = 0.0025)). The CAARMS had good to excellent reliability. CONCLUSIONS: In these preliminary investigations, the CAARMS displayed good to excellent concurrent, discriminant and predictive validity and excellent inter-rater reliability. The CAARMS instrument provides a useful platform for monitoring subthreshold psychotic symptoms for worsening into full-threshold psychotic disorder.     

Adolescents at ultra-high risk of psychosis in Italian neuropsychiatry services: prevalence,psychopathology and transition rate

Studies in adolescents on ultra-high risk (UHR) and basic symptoms (BS) criteria for psychosis prediction are scarce. In Italy, early interventions in psychosis are less widespread than in other European countries. In the present study, we (1) assessed the clinical relevance of a UHR diagnosis [according to the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states (CAARMS) criteria] to promote the implementation of specific services for UHR adolescents into the Italian health care system; (2) described severity of positive, negative, general, and basic symptoms in UHR adolescents compared to adolescents with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and non-UHR adolescents (i.e., individuals who did not meet CAARMS criteria for UHR or FEP); and (3) investigated the predictive validity of UHR criteria in relation to BS criteria. Seventy-nine adolescents (aged 13–18 years) were assessed with the CAARMS, the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), and the schizophrenia proneness instrument, child and youth version (SPI-CY). Both UHR (n = 25) and FEP (n = 11) had significantly higher PANSS subscale scores compared to non-UHR (n = 43). UHR had significantly lower PANSS-positive symptom scores than FEP, but similar global functioning and PANSS-negative symptoms and general psychopathology scores. Compared to non-UHR, both FEP and UHR had more severe thought and perception BS disturbances, and significantly more often met BS criteria. After 12 months, 2 of 20 (10%) UHR had transitioned to psychosis. They also met both BS criteria. Given the uncertain outcome of UHR adolescents, future research is needed to determine whether the combined assessment of BS with UHR symptoms can improve the accuracy of psychosis prediction in adolescence.     

Expressed emotion in first-episode schizophrenia and in ultra high-risk patients: results from the Programma2000 (Milan, Italy)

Expressed emotion (EE) was examined in a large sample of families of patients with either first-episode psychosis (FEP) within the schizophrenia spectrum, or who met the criteria for ultra high-risk (UHR) of psychosis. The aim of our study was to determine the patterns and relationship of EE with the duration of untreated illness (DUI) or of untreated psychosis (DUP), as well as with illness severity. The sample used in our study included 77 FEP and 66 UHR families. The Camberwell Family Interview was used to assess EE.In both samples, about one-third of patients’ families were classified as high EE, with emotional over-involvement (EOI) being the most frequent reason for a family to be classified as high EE. In FEP, higher EE correlated with longer DUI, and higher paternal EOI with longer DUP. DUI, however, was not found to correlate to EE in UHR patients. Severity of illness at the initial assessment did not relate to EE in either FEP or UHR families. Families of FEP and UHR patients were not found to differ in terms of the prevalence of a high EE rating, or of any of its subcomponents.The results of this study only partially support the hypothesis that high EE develops as a reaction to patient status. Patients from families with high EE could possibly benefit from interventions that are targeted at improving their resilience when dealing with problematic family environments.     

Patterns of referral in first-episode schizophrenia and ultra high-risk individuals: results from an early intervention program in Italy

Purpose

This study set out to investigate the patterns of referral in a sample (n = 206) of patients having first-time access to an Italian comprehensive program that targets the early detection of and early intervention on subjects at the onset of psychosis. The primary goal of the study was to investigate the duration of untreated illness (DUI) and/or the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) in the sample since the implementation of the program.

Method

Data on pathways of referrals prospectively collected over a 11-year period, from 1999 to 2010; data referred to patients from a defined catchment area, and who met ICD-10 criteria for a first episode of a psychotic disorder (FEP) or were classified to be at ultra-high risk of psychosis (UHR) according to the criteria developed by the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation (PACE) Clinic in Melbourne. Changes over time in the DUI and DUP were investigated in the sample.

Results

Referrals increased over time, with 20 subjects enrolled per year in the latter years of the study. A large majority of patients contacted a public or private mental health care professional along their pathway to treatment, occurring more often in FEP than in UHR patients. FEP patients who had contact with a non-psychiatric health care professional had a longer DUP. Over time, DUP and DUI did not change in FEP patients, but DUI increased, on average, in UHR patients.

Conclusions

The establishment of an EIP in a large metropolitan area led to an increase of referrals from people and agencies that are not directly involved in the mental health care system; over time, there was an increase in the number of patients with longer DUI and DUP than those who normally apply for psychiatric services.     

Identifying the ultra-high risk (prodromal) population: evaluation of training workshops with mental health services

OBJECTIVE: Recent years have witnessed widespread interest in the early phase of psychotic disorders. The most widely used approach to identify individuals in the prodromal phase is the ultra-high risk (UHR) approach, which combines known trait and state risk factors for psychotic disorder. The Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic introduced the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS) in order to assess UHR status. A training DVD and manual in the use of the CAARMS was recently developed in order to assist with UHR identification. The current paper reports the outcome of a series of training workshops with mental health professionals based around this DVD. The research aim was to investigate whether the training workshops assisted mental health professionals in their confidence and ability to accurately identify UHR cases and distinguish these from non-UHR and first-episode psychosis (FEP) cases. METHOD: A total of 137 mental health workers participated in the training sessions across eight training sites. The training sessions consisted of four modules: theoretical background; rating written vignettes for UHR, non-UHR or FEP status; viewing and discussing the CAARMS Training DVD; and re-rating matched written vignettes for UHR, non-UHR or FEP status. RESULTS: Participants' confidence in identifying UHR cases and in using the CAARMS increased as a result of the workshop. Participants' ability to correctly identify UHR-positive cases did not improve as a result of the workshop. This may have been the result of a ceiling effect due to the baseline ability to identify UHR-positive cases being high. But there was a trend for participants' ability to correctly identify UHR-negative cases to improve as a result of the workshop. CONCLUSIONS: UHR training workshops are a valuable means of increasing mental health workers' confidence in identifying UHR patients. Future UHR training programmes with experienced mental health professionals should pay particular attention to the correct identification of UHR-negative cases.     

A multimodal approach to investigate biomarkers for psychosis in a clinical setting: The integrative neuroimaging studies in schizophrenia targeting for early intervention and prevention (IN-STEP) project

Longitudinal clinical investigations and biological measurements have determined not only progressive brain volumetric and functional changes especially around the onset of psychosis but also the abnormality of developmental pathways based on gene–environment interaction model. However, these studies have contributed little to clinical decisions on their diagnosis and therapeutic choices because of subtle differences between patients and healthy controls. A multi-modal approach may resolve this limitation and is favorable to explore the pathophysiology of psychosis. The integrative neuroimaging studies for schizophrenia targeting early intervention and prevention (IN-STEP) is a research project aimed at exploring the pathophysiological features of the onset of psychosis and investigating possible predictive biomarkers for the clinical treatment of psychosis. Since 2008, we have adopted blood sampling, neurocognitive batteries, neurophysiological assessment, structural imaging, and functional imaging longitudinally for help-seeking ultra-high-risk (UHR) individuals and patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). Here, we intend to introduce the IN-STEP research study protocol and present preliminary clinical findings. Thirty-seven UHR individuals and 30 patients with FEP participated in this study. Six months later, there was no difference in objective and subjective scores between the groups, which suggests that young people having symptoms and functional deficits should be cared for regardless of their history of psychosis according to their clinical stages. The rate of transition to psychosis was 7.1%, 8.0%, and 35.3% (at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively). Through this research project, we expect to clarify the pathophysiological features around the onset of psychosis and improve the prognosis of psychosis through clinical application.     

Does the HoNOS 65+ meet the criteria for a clinical outcome indicator for mental health services for older people?

BACKGROUND: A clinical indicator should demonstrate clinically meaningful change, be relevant, allow comparisons between services, be acceptable to clinicians, and have acceptable validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. The HoNOS 65+ has been suggested as a clinical outcome indicator. The sensitivity to change of the HoNOS 65+ is not known. METHODS: This is a prospective study using routine clinical data. A pilot cohort (n = 42) was used to measure the concurrent validity of the HoNOS 65+ with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and Brief Agitation Rating Scale (BARS). The main cohort of 245 consecutive referrals to a community mental health service for older adults was used to assess sensitivity to change against the CIBIC+. RESULTS: The HoNOS 65+ was acceptable to case managers, most HoNOS 65+ items had excellent interrater reliability and the HoNOS 65+ had good concurrent validity. Changes in the HoNOS 65+ scores between assessment and discharge had a moderate, but significant correlation with CIBIC+ scores. CONCLUSION: The HoNOS 65+ meets the criteria for a clinical outcome indicator for community mental health services for older people. The HoNOS 65+ is sensitive to change.     

Prodromal psychosis screening in adolescent psychiatry clinics

Background: Research has identified a syndrome conferring ultra‐high risk (UHR) for psychosis, although UHR interviews require intensive staff training, time and patient burden. Previously, we developed the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ) to screen more efficiently for UHR syndromes. Aims: This study examined the concurrent validity of the PQ against UHR status and preliminary predictive validity for later psychotic disorder. Method: We assessed a consecutive patient sample of 408 adolescents who presented to psychiatry clinics in Helsinki, Finland, seeking mental health treatment, including 80 participants who completed the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS). Results: A cut‐off score of 18 or more positive symptoms on the PQ predicted UHR diagnoses on the SIPS with 82% sensitivity and 49% specificity. Three of 14 (21%) participants with high PQ scores and SIPS UHR diagnoses developed full psychotic disorders within 1 year. Conclusions: Using the PQ and SIPS together can be an efficient two‐stage screening process for prodromal psychosis in mental health clinics.     

Cognitive functioning in the schizophrenia prodrome

In the last decade, there has been an increasing interest in cognitive alterations during the early course of schizophrenia. From a clinical perspective, a better understanding of cognitive functioning in putative at-risk states for schizophrenia is essential for developing optimal early intervention models. Two approaches have more recently been combined to assess the entire course of the initial schizophrenia prodrome: the predictive "basic symptom at-risk" (BS) and the ultra high-risk (UHR) criteria. Basic symptoms are considered to be present during the entire disease progression, including the initial prodrome, while the onset of symptoms captured by the UHR criteria expresses further disease progression toward frank psychosis. The present study investigated the cognitive functioning in 93 subjects who met either BS or UHR criteria and thus were assumed to be at different points on the putative trajectory to psychosis. We compared them with 43 patients with a first episode of psychosis and to 49 help-seeking patient controls. All groups performed significantly below normative values. Both at-risk groups performed at intermediate levels between the first-episode (FE) group and normative values. The UHR group demonstrated intermediate performance between the FE and BS groups. Overall, auditory working memory, verbal fluency/processing speed, and declarative verbal memory were impaired the most. Our results suggest that cognitive impairments may still be modest in the early stages of the initial schizophrenia prodrome and thus support current efforts to intervene in the early course of impending schizophrenia because early intervention may prevent or delay the onset of frank psychosis and thus prevent further cognitive damage.     

Neural correlates of aberrant emotional salience predict psychotic symptoms and global functioning in high-risk and first-episode psychosis

Neurobiological and behavioral findings suggest that psychosis is associated with corticolimbic hyperactivity during the processing of emotional salience. This has not been widely studied in the early stages of psychosis, and the impact of these abnormalities on psychotic symptoms and global functioning is unknown. We sought to address this issue in 18 patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP), 18 individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis (UHR) and 22 healthy controls (HCs). Corticolimbic response and subjective ratings to emotional and neutral scenes were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The clinical and functional impact of corticolimbic abnormalities was assessed with regression analyses. The FEP and UHR groups reported increased subjective emotional arousal to neutral scenes compared with HCs. Across groups, emotional vs neutral scenes elicited activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula and amygdala. Although FEP and UHR participants showed reduced activation in these regions when viewing emotional scenes compared with controls, this was driven by increased activation to neutral scenes. Corticolimbic hyperactivity to neutral scenes predicted higher levels of positive symptoms and poorer levels of functioning. These results indicate that disruption of emotional brain systems may represent an important biological substrate for the pathophysiology of early psychosis and UHR states.     

Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people

Criteria for identifying individuals at imminent risk for onset of a psychotic disorder, that is "prodromal" for psychosis, have recently been described. The current study set out to test the predictive validity of these criteria in a sample of help-seeking young people aged 15-24 years who were referred to, but not necessarily treated at, a psychiatric service. Ultra High Risk (UHR) status was determined at baseline and psychosis status was assessed at 6 month follow up. Baseline psychosocial functioning was also assessed as a possible predictor of psychosis. In the sample of 292 individuals, 119 (40.7%) met UHR criteria. Of these UHR+ people, 12 became psychotic within 6 months and 107 did not. Only one person not meeting UHR criteria developed psychosis in the follow up period. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of UHR+ status for prediction of psychosis were, respectively, 0.923 (95% CI 0.621, 1), 0.616 (95% CI 0.556, 0.673), 0.101 (95% CI 0.056, 0.173) and 0.994 (95% CI 0.963, 1). UHR+ individuals were significantly more likely to become psychotic than UHR- individuals (Odds Ratio 19.3, 95% CI 2.5, 150.5). Low functioning at baseline was associated with psychosis onset in the whole sample and in the UHR group. The transition to psychosis rate was much lower than in previous samples. This may be a due to the sample being a more general one, not identified as possibly "prodromal". Other potential causes of this reduction in transition are also explored.     

A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis

Background

Symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia are associated with the duration of untreated psychosis. However, no candidate biomarkers have been adopted in clinical settings. Multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), which can easily and noninvasively measure hemodynamics over the prefrontal cortex, is a candidate instrument for clinical use.

Aims

We intended to explore prefrontal dysfunction among individuals at different clinical stages, including ultra-high-risk (UHR), first-episode psychosis (FEP), and chronic schizophrenia (ChSZ), compared to healthy subjects.

Method

Twenty-two UHR subjects, 27 patients with FEP, 38 patients with ChSZ, and 30 healthy subjects participated. We measured hemodynamic changes during a block-designed letter fluency task using multichannel NIRS instruments.

Results

We found that the activations of the bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and the fronto-polar and anterior parts of the temporal cortical regions in the UHR group were lower than those of the controls, but similar to those of the FEP and ChSZ groups. However, the activations in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex regions decrease with advancing clinical stage.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study directly comparing differences in hemodynamic changes with respect to the 3 clinical stages of psychosis. Furthermore, this study also demonstrates different patterns of impairment according to the progression of clinical stages using NIRS instruments. NIRS measurements for UHR and FEP individuals may be candidate biomarkers for the early detection of the clinical stages of psychosis.     

Meta-analysis of Cognitive Deficits in Ultra-high Risk to Psychosis and First-Episode Psychosis: Do the Cognitive Deficits Progress Over,or After,the Onset of Psychosis?

Cognitive dysfunction is a well-established feature of schizophrenia, and there is evidence suggesting that cognitive deficits are secondary to abnormal neurodevelopment leading to problems in acquiring such abilities. However, it is not clear whether there is also a decline in cognitive performance over, or after, the onset of psychosis. Our objective was to quantitatively examine the longitudinal changes in cognitive function in patients who presented with first-episode psychosis (FEP), ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, and controls. Electronic databases were searched for the studies published between January 1987 and February 2013. All studies reporting longitudinal cognitive data in FEP and UHR subjects were retrieved. We conducted meta-analyses of 25 studies including 905 patients with FEP, 560 patients at UHR, and 405 healthy controls. The cognitive performances of FEP, UHR, and healthy controls all significantly improved over time. There was no publication bias, and distributions of effect sizes were very homogenous. In FEP, the degree of improvement in verbal working memory and executive functions was significantly associated with reduction in negative symptoms. There was no evidence of cognitive decline in patients with UHR and FEP. In contrast, the cognitive performances of both groups improved at follow-up. These findings suggest that cognitive deficits are already established before the prodromal phases of psychosis. These data support the neurodevelopmental model rather than neurodegenerative and related staging models of schizophrenia.Key words: schizophrenia, psychosis, cognition, neuropsychology, longitudinal     

The First‐Episode Psychosis Outcome Study: premorbid and baseline characteristics of an epidemiological cohort of 661 first‐episode psychosis patients

Aims: Studies conducted in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) samples avoid many biases. However, very few studies are based on epidemiological cohorts treated in specialized FEP services. The aim of this file audit study was to examine premorbid and baseline characteristics of a large epidemiological sample of FEP. Methods: File audit study of all patients admitted to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre between 1998 and 2000 using a specialized questionnaire. Results: There were 661 patient files included in the study. Premorbid evaluation revealed high rates of substance use disorder (74.1%), history of psychiatric disorder (47.5%), past traumatic events (82.7%) suicide attempts (14.3%) and family history of psychiatric illness (55.6%). Baseline characteristics revealed high intensity of illness (mean CGI 5.5), high prevalence of lack of insight (62%) and high rate of comorbidity (70%). Conclusion: High rates of traumatic events or episodes of mental illness before treatment for FEP must be considered when designing treatment approaches because a too narrow focus on positive psychotic symptoms will inevitably lead to incomplete treatment. Additionally, early intervention programmes need sufficient range of resources to address the multiple challenges presented by FEP patients such as high severity of illness, comorbidities and functional impairment. Finally, observation of an important degree of functional impairment despite short duration of untreated psychosis suggests that while early detection of FEP is a necessary step in early intervention, it may not be sufficient to improve functional recovery in psychosis and that efforts aimed at identifying people during the prodromal phase of psychotic disorders should be pursued.     

Stress and protective factors in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, first episode psychosis and healthy controls

Stress-vulnerability models of schizophrenia regard psychosocial stress as an important factor in the onset and aggravation of psychotic symptoms, but such research in the early phases of psychosis is limited. Protective factors against the effects of stress might be the key to understanding some inconclusive findings and to the development of optimal psychosocial interventions. The present study compared self-reported levels of stress, self-esteem, social support and active coping in 32 patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), 30 individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and 30 healthy controls. Associations with symptoms of psychosis were assessed in both patient groups. Individuals at UHR reported significantly higher stress levels compared to FEP patients. Both patient groups showed lower self-esteem compared to controls, and the UHR group reported lower social support and active coping than controls. These group differences could not be explained by age and dose of antipsychotic medication in the FEP group. In the UHR group, higher stress levels and lower self-esteem were associated with more severe positive and depressive symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Multiple regression analyses revealed that stress was the only significant predictor for both symptom measures and that the relationship was not moderated by self-esteem. Our findings show that individuals at UHR for psychosis experience high levels of psychosocial stress and marked deficits in protective factors. The results suggest that psychosocial interventions targeted at reducing stress levels and improving resilience in this population may be beneficial in improving outcomes.     

Does neuroanatomy account for superior temporal dysfunction in early psychosis? A multimodal MRI investigation

Background

Neuroimaging studies of ultra-high risk (UHR) and first-episode psychosis (FEP) have revealed widespread alterations in brain structure and function. Recent evidence suggests there is an intrinsic relationship between these 2 types of alterations; however, there is very little research linking these 2 modalities in the early stages of psychosis.

Methods

To test the hypothesis that functional alteration in UHR and FEP participants would be associated with corresponding structural alteration, we examined brain function and structure in these participants as well as in a group of healthy controls using multimodal MRI. The data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping.

Results

We included 24 participants in the FEP group, 18 in the UHR group and 21 in the control group. Patients in the FEP group showed a reduction in functional activation in the left superior temporal gyrus relative to controls, and the UHR group showed intermediate values. The same region showed a corresponding reduction in grey matter volume in the FEP group relative to controls. However, while the difference in grey matter volume remained significant after including functional activation as a covariate of no interest, the reduction in functional activation was no longer evident after including grey matter volume as a covariate of no interest.

Limitations

Our sample size was relatively small. All participants in the FEP group and 2 in the UHR group had received antipsychotic medication, which may have impacted neurofunction and/or neuroanatomy.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that superior temporal dysfunction in early psychosis is accounted for by a corresponding alteration in grey matter volume. This finding has important implications for the interpretation of functional alteration in early psychosis.     

When things are not as they seem: detecting first‐episode psychosis upon referral to ultra high risk (‘prodromal’) clinics

The current paper examines a neglected function of ‘ultra high risk’ (UHR) clinics: to detect first‐episode psychosis (FEP) mistakenly identified as a prodrome. A clinical audit was conducted of referrals to a UHR service, the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic, over a 12‐month period (April 2005–March 2006). In this audit, 11.4% of the total number of referrals (n= 149) and 11.9% of those who attended a first appointment were psychotic on referral. These figures indicate that a substantial proportion of individuals thought to be prodromal are in fact suffering FEP. UHR clinics minimize duration of untreated psychosis for FEP patients mistaken as prodromal.     

Discriminant ability and criterion validity of the HoNOS in Italian psychiatric residential facilities

BACKGROUND: The Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) was developed as an inclusive and comprehensive instrument to assess patient outcomes in 4 main domains: behaviour, cognitive and physical impairment, symptoms and social functioning/context. Concerns about the reliability and validity of the HoNOS have been raised. The aim of this study was to further investigate the discriminatory ability of the HoNOS; criterion validity was also examined. SAMPLING AND METHODS: A broad sample of patients with psychotic disorders, admitted to 265 Italian residential facilities, were rated by trained research assistants and local staff on the HoNOS, Global Assessment of Functioning, Life Skills Profile, and Physical Health Index. Discriminant function analysis was used to examine the ability of the HoNOS items to correctly classify patients with positive symptoms, substantial psychosocial impairment or physical disability. The HoNOS criterion validity was also examined. RESULTS: On the whole, the pattern of correlations between the HoNOS and the other corresponding measures was consistent. However, the majority of the correlations were only moderate. In discriminant function analysis, the classification procedure correctly classified 55.7% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HoNOS has many advantages in its brevity, it may lack sufficient discriminatory ability for certain patient groups. Further, it correlates only moderately with measures of disability and physical health status. These findings suggest that the HoNOS alone might be insufficient for routine evaluation and should probably be supplemented by additional measures.