Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock.

In cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has been reported to significantly improve the modest survival benefits afforded by emergency surgical revascularization and thrombolytic therapy. The records of all patients who underwent angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether coronary angioplasty improves survival. Of the 45 patients, 28 (group 1, 62%) had successful dilation of the infarct-related artery and 17 (group 2, 38%) had unsuccessful angioplasty. The groups were similar in extent of coronary artery disease, infarct location, incidence of multivessel disease and hemodynamic variables. The overall hospital survival rate was 56% (71% in group 1 and 29% in group 2). Group 1 patients had more left main coronary artery disease, and group 2 patients were older and had a higher incidence of prior myocardial infarction. Multivariate analysis showed that the survival advantage in patients with successful angioplasty was statistically significant (p = 0.014) when these factors were taken into account. At a mean follow-up interval of 2.3 years (range 1 month to 5.6 years), there were five deaths (four cardiac and one noncardiac), for a 2.3-year survival rate of 80% in patients surviving to hospital discharge. During the follow-up period, 36% of hospital survivors had repeat hospitalization for cardiac evaluation, 8% had myocardial infarction, 8% had coronary artery bypass surgery and 24% had angina.     

Primary coronary angioplasty in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: prediction of the thirty-day mortality risk in an unselected population of patients.

BACKGROUND: The 30-day mortality in catheter-based reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction varies widely in the literature and only some factors, such as cardiogenic shock, are clearly associated with the risk. This non-randomized, single center study investigates the potential factors influencing the 30-day mortality in 586 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, treated with primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: In the whole series and in two subgroups (with and without cardiogenic shock) the clinical, angiographic and procedural variables were used to develop multivariate statistical models for the prediction of the endpoint. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality was 7.3%: 35.8 and 4.5% in patients with and without cardiogenic shock, respectively (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of the 30-day mortality included: a) in the entire series: shock, PTCA angiographic success, time to treatment, age, and coronary artery disease extension; b) in patients with cardiogenic shock: PTCA angiographic success, time to treatment, coronary artery disease extension, and use of abciximab; c) in patients without cardiogenic shock: time to treatment, age, and coronary artery disease extension. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction submitted to primary PTCA, the 30-day mortality rate is a highly predictable endpoint. The role of abciximab therapy and of other independent predictors varies according to the presence or otherwise of cardiogenic shock.     

Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

To evaluate the role of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock, 53 patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were studied. Thirty-five (66.0%) patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase 15 lac units) and 18 (34.0%) underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. There was no significant difference in the mean age, risk factor profile, presence of prior myocardial infarction, site of myocardial infarction and cardiac enzyme levels at presentation between the two groups. More male patients were present in the group undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (94.44% vs 68.57%; p = 0.04). The time delay between the onset of symptoms and presentation to the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (318.9 vs 320.0 minutes; p = NS). In the primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, 17 patients had a single infarct-related artery and one had both left anterior descending and right coronary artery occlusion. Thus in 18 patients, 19 vessels were attempted. Angiographic success (< 50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 15 (78.94%) vessels of which TIMI III flow was achieved in 10 (52.63%) vessels and TIMI II flow in five (26.31%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in five (27.77%) patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. In-hospital mortality was 27.77 percent in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 57.14 percent in patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.04). In the thrombolytic therapy group, mortality was higher (85.91%) in patients presenting six hours or later after the onset of symptoms as compared to those presenting in less than six hours of the onset of symptoms (50%). In primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, mortality was 21.42 percent in patients with successful and 50 percent in patients with failed angioplasty. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, an aggressive invasive strategy with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, as compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy, is helpful in reducing in-hospital mortality.     

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with angioplasty of left main stenosis - two case reports

Two patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock are described. Coronary angiography revealed subtotal left main stenosis. Both patients underwent successful primary coronary angioplasty. The role of coronary angioplasty in patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock is discussed.     

Primary angioplasty in acute inferior myocardial infarction with anomalous-origin right coronary arteries as infarct-related arteries: focus on anatomic and clinical features, outcomes, selection of guiding catheters and management

BACKGROUND: Inferior wall myocardial infarction caused by obstruction of an anomalous-origin right coronary artery (RCA) is a rare angiographic finding; primary angioplasty to an anomalous-origin RCA has never been reported. METHODS: In 185 patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction resulting from RCA occlusion who underwent primary angioplasty, eight patients (4.3%) had anomalous-origin RCAs. RESULTS: Coronary angiography showed that all 8 patients had a dominant RCA. Six patients (75%) had an anomalous-origin RCA arising from the anterior aspect of the ascending aorta above the sinotubular line and the other 2 patients (25%) had an anomalous-origin RCA arising from the left sinus of Valsalva with a separate ostium from the left main coronary artery. The standard Judkins right guiding catheter did not offer adequate support in these patients. In the group of 6 patients, an Amplatz guiding catheter offered good support, while a standard Judkins left guiding catheter was adequate in the other 2 patients. Obstruction of the proximal RCA occurred in 6 patients (75%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 6 patients (75%), resulting in an uneventful clinical course and long-term survival (mean follow-up, 24.9 +/- 16.5 months). Two patients (25%) had unsuccessful reperfusion and died from cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, anomalous-origin RCAs were the dominant artery and predisposed to atherosclerosis at the proximal portions. We suggest that appropriate guide catheter selection and careful manipulation are essential for the success of revascularization. Complete reperfusion results in an excellent clinical and long-term outcome in patients with anomalous-origin RCAs.     

Effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in patients on dialysis

We sought to characterize the outcome in patients who were on long-term dialysis and who underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction. Of 2,831 consecutive patients who underwent primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction from 1993 to 2001, 15 patients on long-term dialysis were identified. This small cohort had a 40% incidence of cardiogenic shock on admission. Despite the angiographic success rate for primary PTCA of 80%, in-hospital mortality was 53%.     

Systematic Direct Angioplasty and Stent-Supported Direct Angioplasty Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: In-Hospital and Long-Term Survival

Objectives. This prospective observational study was conducted to examine the apparent impact of a systematic direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) strategy on mortality in a series of 66 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock, and to analyze the predictors of outcome after successful direct PTCA.Background. Previous studies have reported encouraging results with PTCA in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, but a biased case selection for PTCA may have heavily influenced the observed outcomes.Methods. All patients admitted with AMI were considered eligible for direct PTCA, including those with the most profound shock, and no upper age limit was used. The treatment protocol also included stenting of the infarct-related artery for a poor or suboptimal angiographic result after conventional PTCA.Results. Between January 1995 and March 1997, 364 consecutive patients underwent direct PTCA, and in 66 patients AMI was complicated by cardiogenic shock. In patients with cardiogenic shock, direct PTCA had a success rate of 94%; an optimal angiographic result was achieved in 85%; primary stenting of the infarct-related artery was accomplished in 47%; and the in-hospital mortality rate was 26%. Univariate analysis showed that patient age, chronic coronary occlusion and completeness of revascularization were significantly related to in-hospital mortality. The mean follow-up period was 16 ± 8 months. Survival rate at 6 months was 71%. Comparison of event-free survival in patients with a stented or nonstented infarct-related artery suggests an initial and long-term benefit of primary stenting.Conclusions. Systematic direct PTCA, including stent-supported PTCA, can establish a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow in the great majority of patients presenting with AMI and early cardiogenic shock. High performance criteria, including new devices such as coronary stents, should be considered in randomized trials where mechanical revascularization therapy is being tested.     

PRimary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy. Comparison of mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction - a single centre experience

BACKGROUND: Patency of an infarct-related artery may be achieved by the use of primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolysis. In spite of the growing number of reports dealing with this topic, controversies exist as to the superiority of either of these therapeutic options. Moreover, the role of primary angioplasty has not yet been clearly defined in the guidelines of the Polish Cardiac Society. AIM: To compare mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients treated with primary angioplasty versus patients receiving thrombolytic treatment. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients with acute MI admitted to our institution, we analysed retrospectively mortality in patients treated with primary angioplasty versus those who received thrombolysis. RESULTS: Between May 1996 and October 2000, 657 patients with acute MI were hospitalised. Of this group, in 66 (10%) patients primary angioplasty was performed, and 278 (42.3%) received thrombolysis. Cardiogenic shock complicated MI in 20 (30%) patients treated with angioplasty and in 19 (7%) thrombolysed patients. Total mortality in the acute phase of MI was 12 (18.2%) patients in the angioplasty group versus 26 (9.4%) patients in the medically treated group (p<0.05). Mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock was significantly higher in those who received thrombolysis than in those who underwent angioplasty [17 (89.5%) patients versus 11 (55%) patients (p<0.05)] and tended to be higher among patients without cardiogenic shock [9 (3%) thrombolysed patients versus 1 (2.2%) patient who underwent angioplasty, NS]. CONCLUSIONS: Primary coronary angioplasty improves the outcome in patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock and tends to decrease mortality among patients without cardiogenic shock.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Modest survival benefits have been reported in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who were treated with early surgical revascularization or thrombolytic therapy. To determine whether coronary angioplasty improves survival, 87 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 1975 to 1985 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in group 1 (n = 59) were treated with conventional therapy; patients in group 2 (n = 24) were treated with conventional therapy and angioplasty. Extent of coronary artery disease, infarct location, and incidence of multivessel disease were similar between groups. Hemodynamic variables including cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were also similar. The 30-day survival was significantly improved for group 2 patients (50% vs. 17%, p = 0.006). Survival in group 2 patients with successful angioplasty was 77% (10 of 13 patients) versus 18% (two of 11 patients) in patients with unsuccessful angioplasty, (p = 0.006). The findings suggest that angioplasty improves survival in cardiogenic shock compared with conventional therapy with survival contingent upon successful reperfusion of the infarct-related artery.     

Left main intervention revisited: Early and late outcome of PTCA and stenting

We reviewed our experience with 28 unselected, consecutive patients undergoing left main coronary artery (LMCA) angioplasty who had been considered unsuitable for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Fourteen patients (50%) had a protected LMCA circulation. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 11 patients (39.3%), and stents were implanted in 17 patients (60.7%). The procedure was elective in 22 patients (78.6%) and acute in the setting of myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock in (21.4%). The mean follow-up duration was 15.9 ± 12 months. There were 5 early (before hospital discharge) and 4 late deaths (total 32.1%), 1 myocardial infarction (3.6%), 6 repeat angioplasties (21.4%), and 3 subsequent CABG (10.7%). All 5 early deaths occurred in patients with cardiogenic shock and unprotected circulation. The results of our study suggest that when patients have prohibitive surgical risks, elective LMCA angioplasty and/or stenting may be undertaken with a high procedural success rate. However, our data do not support intervention in the presence of acute myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 41:21–29, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in unselected, consecutive patients after acute percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. This involved a follow-up study from a prospectively conducted patient registry in a tertiary referral center. A total of 59 patients (10 female/49 male; median age 62 years (32-91)) with percutaneous transluminal cardiac interventions in primary cardiogenic shock were identified between January 1995 and January 2000. Twenty-two patients (37%) had been resuscitated successfully before intervention. The in-hospital mortality of shock patients was 36% (n=21, median age 68 (47-84)). The median follow-up of survivors was 18.1 (7-57.3) months, during which three further patients died (8%; two because of sudden cardiac deaths, one because of acute reinfarction). Achievement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow III after acute PTCA (84% in survivors vs. 38% in non-survivors; P<0.001) and the absence of the left main coronary artery (3% survivors vs. 29% non-survivors; P=0.003) as culprit lesion in patients with cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate. A second cardiac intervention was performed in seven patients (18%). Overall functional capacity of shock survivors was good. At final follow-up, 80% of the survivors were completely asymptomatic. One patient had angina pectoris NYHA II, five patients dyspnoea NYHA class II. Exercise stress-test was performed in 24 of the 38 surviving patients, median exercise capacity was 100% (range 55-113%) of the age adjusted predicted value. In unselected patients with cardiogenic shock due to AMI, treatment with acute PTCA resulted in an in-hospital mortality of 36%, low late mortality and good functional capacity in long-term survivors. TIMI flow grade III after acute PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate whereas the left main coronary artery as culprit lesion was associated with worse outcome.     

Elective primary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock: results from a single center

INTRODUCTION. Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of death among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Conventional treatment for acute myocardial infarction does not achieve a better outcome in these patients, but prior studies with emergency revascularization by coronary angioplasty seem to provide encouraging results. PATIENTS AND METHOD. A retrospective study of the clinical and angiographic results of elective primary angioplasty in 48 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction of less than 12 hours is described. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was used in 79% of the patients. Patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to mechanical complications were excluded. RESULTS. Angiographic success, defined as a residual stenosis < 50% and final TIMI flow >/= 2, was achieved in 85% of the culprit lesions, and stents were implanted in 76%. Multivessel angioplasty was performed in 25% of the patients, and abciximab was used in 35% of the cases. Mean time from the onset of symptoms to angioplasty was 7.4 +/- 3.1 hours. In-hospital survival was 58%, and was 54% at six months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS. Emergency coronary revascularization with primary angioplasty and intracoronary stenting is effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. TIMI flow >/= 2 is achieved in most patients, and mortality is reduced when compared with conservative treatment in historical series.     

Early coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: have novel therapies led to better results?

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiogenic shock constitute a very high risk subset despite an aggressive management. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the results of early coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock have changed over the last years, and to address which role the recent adjuvant therapies have played in this evolution. From 1991 to April 1999, 94 patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock were treated with coronary angioplasty within the first 12 hours from the onset of symptoms. Temporal changes of the utilization of adjuvant therapies and operators experience were studied over these years, as well as their impact on the angiographic results and in-hospital outcome. Over the years, a progressive and significant increase on the use of coronary stents and c7E3Fab was observed, as well as an increased number of primary angioplasties performed per month. The proportion of patients treated with intraaortic balloon pump did not changed significantly over the years. An angiographic successful result (< 50% residual stenosis and TIMI flow 2 or 3) and a final TIMI grade 3 flow were obtained in 76 (80.9%) and 61 (64.9%) patients, respectively. The angiographic success rate progressively increased over the years, from 72.3% in patients treated before 1994 to 94.1% in those admitted in 1998Eth 1999 (p for trend 0.0409). The proportion of patients with a final TIMI grade 3 flow also grew progressively over the years: from 36.4% before 1994 to 76.5% after 1997 (p for trend 0. 0209). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 63.8% (60 patients), and there was no significant change in mortality rate over the years. Therefore, apart from the growing operators experience, we have observed an incremental change in the use of coronary stents and c7E3 Fab (abciximab) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock treated with early coronary angioplasty. All these factors have led to an improvement in the angiographic results, although this change has not meant a significant reduction of mortality.     

Percutaneous ventricular assist device placement during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for severe refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction is associated with a high mortality rate despite modern reperfusion methods and intra-aortic balloon pump support. For myocardial infarction patients in cardiogenic shock that is refractory to intra-aortic ballon pump counterpulsation and pressors (severe refractory cardiogenic shock), there are limited means to rapidly provide additional hemodynamic support. We present the case of a 49-year-old man who presented with an anterior wall acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. After resuscitation and stabilization with intra-aortic balloon pump and pressor support, the patient underwent successful emergent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stenting of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Forty-eight hours later, the patient again went into severe refractory cardiogenic shock; pulseless electrical activity arrest followed. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started, and the patient underwent urgent placement of a TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device. The device enabled the reversal of terminal hemodynamic collapse during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation, subsequent stabilization of the patient, and discharge of the patient from the hospital after device removal. In this patient, the percutaneous ventricular assist device was successful in the treatment of severe refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.     

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients: does admission to a tertiary center improve survival?

Background The role of early revascularization among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock remains controversial. Angioplasty registries, while suggesting a benefit, are subject to selection bias, and clinical trials have been underpowered to detect early benefits. If an invasive strategy is beneficial in this population, patients admitted to hospitals with onsite coronary revascularization might be expected to have a better prognosis. We sought to determine whether access to cardiovascular resources at the admitting hospital influenced the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Methods By use of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project database (a retrospective medical record review of Medicare patients discharged with acute myocardial infarction), we identified patients aged ≥65 years whose myocardial infarction was complicated by cardiogenic shock. Results Of the 601 patients with cardiogenic shock, 287 (47.8%) were admitted to hospitals without revascularization services and 314 (52.2%) were admitted to hospitals with coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery facilities. Clinical characteristics were similar across the subgroups. Patients admitted to hospitals with revascularization services were more likely to undergo coronary revascularization during the index hospitalization and during the first month after acute myocardial infarction. After adjustment for demographic, clinical, hospital, and treatment strategies, the presence of onsite revascularization services was not associated with a significantly lower 30-day (odds ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.47, 1.45) or 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.49, 1.72). Conclusions In a community-based cohort, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock did not have significantly different adjusted 30-day and 1-year mortality, irrespective of the revascularization capabilities of the admitting hospital. (Am Heart J 2002;143:768-76.)     

Results of Stent Supported Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in Octogenarians With Coronary Artery Disease

Between January 1995 and July 1998, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed on 27 lesions in 24 octogenarians. Half of the patients were African American. Women comprised 67% of the study group. Patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction constituted 54% of the cohort. Two-thirds of the patients (83%) had single vessel disease with predominant class A and B lesion complexity of the angioplasty site. Acute success rate was 92%. Stents were successfully placed in 11 subjects (46%). None had acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, or stroke as a complication of the procedure. One patient presenting with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, died. Significant bleeding complications requiring blood transfusions occurred in 17% of patients. Of the patients, 23 (96%) were discharged in a clinically stable condition. Follow up during a two year period was completed in 21 patients (88%). One patient died of cancer. Four subjects (19%) underwent repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. One other patient had recurrent chest pain requiring multiple hospitalizations. The remaining 16 patients (76%) remained free of recurrence of angina. We concluded that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stent placement can be performed in octogenarians with a high rate of clinical and angiographic success with an acceptable range of morbidity and mortality, and favorable long term (two year) outcome.     

Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians

Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in nonagenarians are very scarce. The investigators present a series of 26 nonagenarians who underwent PCI (29 lesions, 1.1 +/- 0.3 per patient). Most (96%) had acute coronary syndrome at presentation, 27% underwent primary PCI for acute myocardial infarctions, and 54% had multivessel disease. Angiographically successful results were obtained in 24 patients (92%), and coronary stents were used in 81%. Five patients (19%) died during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was significantly greater in patients with Killip class III or IV at presentation (100% vs 9%, p = 0.001), in those in whom the procedure was a primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction (57% vs 5%, p = 0.010), and in the presence of angiographic failure (100% vs 13%, p = 0.031). In-hospital mortality was 0% after excluding patients in cardiogenic shock and those with primary PCI. Thus, most nonagenarians who undergo PCI have a high-risk profile. However, PCI achieves a successful angiographic result in most patients. Mortality is high but concentrated in patients in cardiogenic shock and with primary angioplasty as PCI.     

Coronary angioplasty in the acute myocardial infarction: in which patients is it less likely to obtain an adequate coronary reperfusion?

INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty, the inability to achieve successful coronary reperfusion is associated with higher mortality. The objective of the study was to identify which characteristics may predict a lower angiographic success rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with coronary angioplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population is constituted by the 790 patients with acute myocardial infarction that were treated with angioplasty within the 12 hours after the onset of symptoms from 1991 to 1999 at our institution. A successful angiographic result was considered in presence of a residual stenosis < 50% and a TIMI flow 2 or 3 after the procedure. RESULTS: A successful angiographic result and a final TIMI 3 flow were achieved in 736 (93.2%) and 652 (82.5%) patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with angiographic failure than in those with angiographic successful result (48 vs. 10%; p < 0.01). Age under 65 (91 vs. 95%; p = 0.02), non smoking (90 vs. 96%; p < 0,01), previous infarction (87 vs. 94%; p < 0.01), angioplasty after failed thrombolysis (83 vs. 94%; p = 0. 02), cardiogenic shock (80 vs. 95%; p < 0.01), undetermined location (67 vs. 93%; p < 0.01), non-inferior location (92 vs. 96%; p = 0.04), left bundle branch block (64 vs. 94%; p < 0.01), multivessel disease (91 vs. 95%; p = 0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.40 (89 vs. 97%; p < 0.01), no utilization of coronary stenting (90 vs. 96%; p < 0.01), and use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation pump (82 vs. 95%; p < 0.01) were associated with a lower angiographic success rate. In the multivariable analysis, the following were independent predictors for angiographic failure: left bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR], 12.95; CI 95%, 3.00-53.90), cardiogenic shock (OR, 4.20; CI 95%, 1.95-8.75), no utilization of coronary stent (OR, 3.44; CI 95%, 1.71-7.37), and previous infarction (OR, 2.82; CI 95%, 1.29-5.90). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angioplasty allows a successful coronary recanalization in most patients with acute myocardial infarction. Some basic characteristics, however, may identify some subsets in which a successful angiographic result may be more difficult to obtain.     

Implications for patient triage from survival and left ventricular functional recovery analyses in 500 patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

The in-hospital course of 500 consecutive patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was reviewed in relation to their clinical and angiographic presentation and angioplasty outcome to determine which patients benefit most from successful angioplasty in this setting. Patient age was 56 +/- 11 years (mean +/- SD) and 78% were men; 46% had anterior myocardial infarction, 49% received concomitant intravenous thrombolytic therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction was 47 +/- 11% and median time to angioplasty was 4.7 h (range 1 to 24). Angioplasty was successful in 78% of patients and partially successful in 7% of patients; the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.2%. Multivariate analysis found six independent correlates (p less than 0.05) of in-hospital mortality: left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 30%, lack of postangioplasty infarct artery patency, age greater than 65 years, recurrent ischemia after successful angioplasty, emergency bypass surgery and arterial pressure on admission to the catheterization laboratory less than 100 mm Hg. After consideration of these predictors of survival in multivariate analyses, angioplasty success still was independently correlated with improved in-hospital survival for patients with cardiogenic shock (p = 0.002) and anterior myocardial infarction (p = 0.007). A trend toward an independent beneficial effect of successful angioplasty on survival was also noted in patients with inferior wall infarction and precordial ST segment depression (p = 0.063) and for all patients who were hypotensive on admission to the catheterization laboratory, regardless of the infarct site (p = 0.057).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--a review

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by inadequate tissue perfusion due to cardiac dysfunction and is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Mortality from cardiogenic shock still remains high. The development of cardiogenic shock is rarely unexpected; most patients who develop cardiogenic shock do so within 48 hrs of admission, with only 10% shocked on arrival. Mortality rate is exceedingly high and reaches 70-80% in those treated conservatively. Early revascularization is the cornerstone treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. According to the guidelines, revascularization is effective up to 36 hours after the onset of cardiogenic shock and performed within 18 hours after the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the most efficient therapy to restore coronary flow in the infarct-related artery. However, invasive strategy in a developing country like ours is not only costly but also technically demanding. We present a case of acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and also review the incidence, pathophysiology, management and outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.