SWOG S1400C (NCT02154490)—A Phase II Study of Palbociclib for Previously Treated Cell Cycle Gene Alteration–Positive Patients with Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancer (Lung-MAP Substudy)

ObjectiveLung-MAP (SWOG S1400) is a master platform trial assessing targeted therapies in squamous NSCLC. The objective of study C (S1400C) was to evaluate the response rate to palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 inhibitor, in patients with cell cycle gene abnormalities.MethodsPatients with squamous NSCLC, a performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function who had progressed after at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 gene (CDK4) or cyclin D1 gene (CCND1), cyclin D2 gene (CCND2), or cyclin D3 gene (CCND3) amplifications on tumor specimens were eligible. The study was originally designed as a phase II/III trial comparing palbociclib with docetaxel, but it was modified to a single-arm phase II trial with the primary end point of response when immunotherapy was approved. If two or fewer responses were seen in the first 20 patients, then the study would cease enrollment.ResultsA total of 88 patients (9% of patients screened) were assigned to S1400C, and 53 patients enrolled (including 17 to receive docetaxel). One patient who had been registered to receive docetaxel was re-registered to receive palbociclib after progression while taking docetaxel. The frequencies of cell cycle gene alterations in the eligible patients taking palbociclib (n = 32) were as follows: CCND1, 81% (n = 26); CCND2, 9% (n = 3); CCND3, 6% (n = 2); and CDK4, 3% (n = 1). In all, 32 eligible patients received palbociclib. There were two partial responses (response rate 6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0%–15%]), both with CCND1 amplification. Twelve patients had stable disease (38% [95% CI: 21%–54%]). The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.6–2.9 months) and the median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.2–12.5).ConclusionPalbociclib as monotherapy failed to demonstrate the prespecified criteria for advancement to phase III testing.     

Molecular mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A review

Deregulation of the cyclin D-CDK4/6-INK4-RB pathway leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation, is frequently observed in breast cancer. Currently, three selective CDK4/6 inhibitors have been FDA approved: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Despite promising clinical outcomes, intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors has limited the success of these treatments; therefore, the development of various strategies to overcome this resistance is of great importance. We highlight the various mechanisms that are directly or indirectly responsible for resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, categorizing them into two broad groups; cell cycle-specific mechanisms and cell cycle-nonspecific mechanisms. Elucidation of the diverse mechanisms through which resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors occurs, may aid in the design of novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes. This review summarizes the currently available knowledge regarding mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and possible therapeutic strategies that may overcome this resistance as well.     

Polyclonal RB1 mutations and acquired resistance to CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundWhile deregulation of the cyclin D1-CDK4/6-retinoblastoma pathway is common in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, Rb is usually intact in HR+ breast cancer, and targeted CDK 4/6 inhibitors that act upstream of Rb, are routinely being utilized in clinical practice. However, factors that can lead to clinical resistance to CDK 4/6 inhibitors are not known.Patients and methodsWe identified patients who had pre- and post-genotyping in tissue and peripheral blood samples after receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Genotyping was carried out in tumor tissue or blood collected before start of CDK 4/6 inhibitor and after disease progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitor, covering more than 90% of the coding region in RB1.ResultsWe identified detectable acquired RB1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, palbociclib, ribociclib) for 5, 8, and 13 months, respectively, in three patients. The RB1 mutations included substitution in donor splicing site of exon 8 of the RB1 gene in patient #1; substitution in donor splicing site of exon 22 of RB1 gene, exon 19 deletion, exon 3 insertion in patient #2; and RB1 exon 16 H483Y mutation in patient #3. None of these RB1 mutations were present in the pre-CDK 4/6 specimen highlighting these molecular alterations, which lead to functional loss of Rb1, likely emerged under selective pressure from the CDK4/6 inhibitor potentially confering therapeutic resistance.ConclusionThis is the first clinical report to describe the emergence of somatic RB1 mutations after exposure to palbociclib or ribociclib, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further research is needed to validate these findings, identify how these mutations temporally emerge under selective pressure of CDK 4/6 inhibitor, and develop rational therapeutic strategies.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: preliminary results and ongoing studies

The cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i) induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase what eventually can prevent the proliferation of cancer cells. The CDK4/6i have changed the landscape of treatment options for ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Currently, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in this setting. This success encouraged the researchers to examine CDK4/6i activity in (neo)adjuvant setting. In this review, clinical data to date and ongoing clinical trials with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in the early breast cancer are discussed. A literature search of these topics was carried out using PubMed and data reported at international oncology meetings and clinicaltrials.gov were included. Currently, we have the early promising data from Phase II clinical trials of CDK4/6i efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting in women with HR-positive breast cancer. Moreover, there are numerous studies that are in progress today in (neo)adjuvant setting.     

Landscape of Cyclin Pathway Genomic Alterations Across 5,356 Prostate Cancers: Implications for Targeted Therapeutics

The cyclin pathway may confer resistance to standard treatments but also offer novel therapeutic opportunities in prostate cancer. Herein, we analyzed prostate cancer samples (majority metastatic) using comprehensive genomic profiling performed by next-generation sequencing (315 genes, >500× coverage) for alterations in activating and sensitizing cyclin genes (CDK4 amplification, CDK6 amplification, CCND1, CCND2, CCND3, CDKN2B [loss], CDKN2A [loss], SMARCB1), androgen receptor (AR) gene, and coalterations in genes leading to cyclin inhibitor therapeutic resistance (RB1 and CCNE1). Overall, cyclin sensitizing pathway genomic abnormalities were found in 9.7% of the 5,356 tumors. Frequent alterations included CCND1 amplification (4.2%) and CDKN2A and B loss (2.4% each). Alterations in possible resistance genes, RB1 and CCNE1, were detected in 9.7% (up to 54.6% in neuroendocrine) and 1.2% of cases, respectively, whereas AR alterations were seen in 20.9% of tumors (~27.3% in anaplastic). Cyclin sensitizing alterations were also more frequently associated with concomitant AR alterations.     

Phase II Trial of Palbociclib in Patients with Advanced Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Lessons Learned

• Palbociclib monotherapy demonstrated minimal clinical activity in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal cancers.
• Further clinical evaluation of palbociclib monotherapy is not warranted in gastroesophageal cancers, but improved understanding of resistance mechanisms may permit rational combination approaches.

BackgroundDysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. Progression through the G1/S transition requires phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (RB) by cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6, which are regulated by cyclins D and E. Amplifications of cyclin D loci and activating mutations in CDKs are frequent molecular aberrations in gastroesophageal malignancies. We conducted a phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib as an initial test of efficacy.MethodsPatients with previously treated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers with intact RB nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry were treated with 125 mg daily of palbociclib for days 1–21 of 28‐day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.ResultsWe screened 29 patients and enrolled 21 patients: 5 with gastric adenocarcinoma, 3 with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 8 with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 5 with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. All 29 tumors screened had intact nuclear RB expression, and four treated patients tested positive for CCND1 overexpression. No objective responses were seen. Median progression‐free survival was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 3.0 months. All recurrent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hematologic, with neutropenia in eight patients (38%), anemia in four patients (19%), and thrombocytopenia in two patients (10%).ConclusionPalbociclib has limited single‐agent activity in gastroesophageal tumors.     

Palbociclib synergizes with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in treatment naïve melanoma but not after the development of BRAF inhibitor resistance

Increased CDK4 activity occurs in the majority of melanomas and CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with BRAF and MEK inhibitors are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of melanoma. We hypothesize that the timing of the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to the current BRAF and MEK inhibitor regime will impact on the efficacy of this triplet drug combination. The efficacy of BRAF, MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents and in combination was assessed in human BRAF mutant cell lines that were treatment naïve, BRAF inhibitor tolerant or had acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Xenograft studies were then performed to test the in vivo efficacy of the BRAF and CDK4/6 inhibitor combination. Melanoma cells that had developed early reversible tolerance or acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition remained sensitive to palbociclib. In drug‐tolerant cells, the efficacy of the combination of palbociclib with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors was equivalent to single agent palbociclib. Similarly, acquired BRAF inhibitor resistance cells lost efficacy to the palbociclib and BRAF combination. In contrast, upfront treatment of melanoma cells with palbociclib in combination with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors induced either cell death or senescence and was superior to a BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combination. In vivo palbociclib plus BRAF inhibitor induced rapid and sustained tumor regression without the development of therapy resistance. In summary, upfront dual targeting of CDK4/6 and mutant BRAF signaling enables tumor cells to evade resistance to monotherapy and is required for robust and sustained tumor regression. Melanoma patients whose tumors have acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition are less likely to have favorable responses to subsequent treatment with the triplet combination of BRAF, MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors.     

Palbociclib or Ribociclib in First-Line Treatment in Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Receptor 2–Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Perspective Based on Pharmacologic Costs

PurposeTo assess the pharmacologic costs of CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and ribociclib) in hormone receptor–positive (HR⁺)/human epidermal receptor 2–negative (HER2^?) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). Pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered.DiscussionTwo phase 3 RCTs including 1334 patients were considered. European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale reached grade 3 for the PALOMA-2 and MONALEESA-2 trials. Pharmacologic costs of palbociclib and ribociclib at full dose were similar, at €3864 and €4002 per month of progression-free survival (PFS) gained, respectively. The reduction of dose of ribociclib (36.1% in the pivotal RCT vs. 36.0% of palbociclib in pivotal RCT) resulted in €2718 and €1348 per month of PFS gained at 400 and 200 mg daily, respectively.ConclusionWhen pharmacologic costs of drugs are combined with the measure of efficacy represented by PFS, both palbociclib and ribociclib are cost-effective first-line treatments in postmenopausal women with HR⁺/HER2^? advanced or metastatic BC, with a lower cost in favor of ribociclib in patients with dose reduction.     

Optimal vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review

Purpose

Prospective information regarding the tolerability and efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET) alone and in combination with targeted agents in older patients in the metastatic setting is limited. This review summarizes available trial data in this population.

Methods

We searched PubMed for Phase 2 or 3 trials with age-stratified patient cohorts (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years in most studies) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2?) advanced breast cancer treated with ET ± targeted agents.

Results

We identified 19 studies reporting 10 clinical trials. Efficacy was similar in age-stratified subsets. There was a reduced disease progression risk for ET + everolimus, palbociclib, or ribociclib versus ET alone. In the first-line setting, median progression-free survival (mPFS) in older patients was 8.5, 26.2 months, and not reached with letrozole + temsirolimus, palbociclib, and ribociclib, respectively, and in younger patients was 9.0, 18.8 months, and not reached, respectively. In the second-line setting, older patients had mPFS of 6.8 and 9.9 months with everolimus + exemestane and palbociclib + fulvestrant, respectively, and younger patients had mPFS of 8.1 and 9.5 months, respectively. Tolerability was worse for combination therapy versus monotherapy. No age-related differences in discontinuations were observed for CDK4/6 inhibitors, although a higher rate of treatment discontinuation was observed for patients ≥ 70 years receiving everolimus + exemestane. Adverse event rates were similar in age-stratified subsets.

Conclusions

ET + CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors are likely safe and effective in older patients with HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer.

     

CDK4/6-Inhibitoren beim Mammakarzinom

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival in numerous clinical trials in metastasized hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Since palbociclib and ribociclib were approved in Germany, CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with antihormonal therapy have been a standard treatment in first- and also in second-line therapy. Abemaciclib, the third CDK4/6, inhibitor will be approved in Germany this year. Side effects, particularly neutropenia, are well managed in daily routine by dose reductions and dose interruptions. The necessary intensive treatment monitoring has to be adhered to precisely, in order to administer treatment in the form of a well-tolerated maintenance therapy. Several clinical trials in the neo-/adjuvant setting are currently in progress, in order to transfer the survival advantage from the metastasized situation into early breast cancer. The aim of this article is to elucidate the mode of action, efficacy, and side effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitors, and to put them in a current clinical context.     

Racial disparities in neutrophil counts among patients with metastatic breast cancer during treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment - The three CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) approved for use in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib,...     

Comparison of treatment-related adverse events of different Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: A network meta-analysis

BackgroundPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have all been approved in combination with endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. While the efficacy of these drugs appears similar, differences in safety and tolerability are apparent.MethodsWe searched PubMed and ASCO, ESMO and SABCS proceedings to identify randomized trials of palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Data on common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each approved drug. The odds ratio for each AE and the hazard ratio for progression-free survival were calculated relative to endocrine therapy alone. A network meta-analysis was then performed for each endocrine therapy backbone (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant) to compare ribociclib and abemaciclib to palbociclib.Results8 trials were included in the analysis and comprised 2799 patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib: 873 patients; ribociclib: 1153 patients; abemaciclib: 773 patients. In 5 trials (1524 patients), the endocrine therapy backbone was an AI and in 3 trials (1275 patients) it was fulvestrant. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib showed significantly lower grade 3–4 neutropenia, but significantly higher GI toxicity. Treatment discontinuation was higher with abemaciclib than other drugs. Efficacy of the 3 drugs was similar. Compared to palbociclib, for AI backbone, the HR for PFS for ribociclib was 0.98 and for abemaciclib 1.02. For fulvestrant backbone, the HR were 0.88 and 0.93 respectively.ConclusionsPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have comparable efficacy, but differences in safety and tolerability. Abemaciclib has worse tolerability with significantly higher treatment discontinuation likely due to GI toxicity.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors as first-line treatment for post-menopausal metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials

Background

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AI) versus AI alone as first-line therapy for patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified after a systematic review of electronic databases. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) using the inverse-variance method. The Mantel–Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for overall response, clinical benefit rate and treatment-related side effects. Heterogeneity was measured using the tau-squared and I² statistics.

Results

After a systematic search, three phase III RCT (n = 1827) were included. The use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib) in combination with an AI was significantly associated with longer PFS compared to the use of letrozole or anastrozole alone (HR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.50–0.65; p < 0.00001), with no significant heterogeneity among trials. Similarly, overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were higher for patients who received the combination therapy than for patients allocated to AI alone. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related side effects were more frequently reported for patients who received CDK 4/6 inhibitors (OR: 7.51; 95% CI 6.01–9.38; p < 0.00001), these included mainly neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia.

Conclusion

The addition of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (either abemaciclib, palbociclib, or ribociclib) to an AI (anastrozole or letrozole) significantly improved PFS, overall response rate, and clinical benefit rate in comparison with a nonsteroidal AI alone.

     

CDK4/6抑制剂抗肿瘤作用研究进展

细胞周期素依赖性蛋白激酶4/6（cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6,CDK4/6）与细胞周期蛋白D（cyclin D）结合,通过调节细胞G1-S期转换,成为细胞周期调控机制的核心部分。CDK4/6-cyclin D-INK4-Rb通路的异常活化将会导致癌细胞失控性生长,该通路的异常存在于多种恶性肿瘤中,因此CDK4/6成为潜在的治疗靶点。本文对CDK4/6的作用机制,及主要几种CDK4/6抑制剂的研究进展进行综述,旨在探讨CDK4/6抑制剂在恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用前景及优化手段。     

Abemaciclib,a CDK4/6 inhibitor,exerts preclinical activity against aggressive germinal center‐derived B‐cell lymphomas

The revised WHO classification newly defined the entities “High‐grade B‐cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL‐DH/TH)” and “HGBL, NOS.” Standard immunochemotherapy for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), R‐CHOP, is insufficient for HGBL patients, and there are currently no optimized therapeutic regimens for HGBL. We previously reported that CCND3, which encodes cyclin D3, harbored high mutation rates in Burkitt lymphoma (BL), HGBL and a subset of DLBCL. Furthermore, the knockdown of cyclin D3 expression was toxic to germinal center (GC)‐derived B‐cell lymphomas. Thus, the fundamental function of cyclin D3 is important for the pathogenesis of GC‐derived B‐cell lymphoma. We herein used two structurally different CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and abemaciclib, and examined their suppressive effects on cell proliferation and their ability to induce apoptosis in various aggressive B‐cell lymphoma cell lines. The results obtained demonstrated that abemaciclib more strongly suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in GC‐derived B‐cell lymphoma cell lines than the control, but only slightly inhibited those features in activated B‐cell (ABC)‐like DLBCL cell lines. Palbociclib exerted partial or incomplete effects compared with the control and the effect was intermediate between abemaciclib and the control. Moreover, the effects of abemaciclib appeared to depend on cyclin D3 expression levels based on the results of the expression analysis of primary aggressive B‐cell lymphoma samples. Therefore, abemaciclib has potential as a therapeutic agent for aggressive GC‐derived B‐cell lymphomas.     

Ribociclib Plus Letrozole in Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive,HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer with No Prior Endocrine Therapy: Subgroup Safety Analysis from The Phase 3b CompLEEment-1 Trial

BackgroundThe CDK4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy significantly improved progression-free survival in the first line setting in post-menopausal patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a pivotal phase 3, placebo-controlled trial (MONALEESA-2) and demonstrated superior overall survival in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC (MONALEESA-7). The multinational, phase 3b, CompLEEment-1 trial, which assessed the safety and efficacy of ribociclib plus letrozole in a broader population of patients who have not received prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease, is the largest phase 3 clinical trial to date to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a CDK4/6 inhibitor. We report a subanalysis of data from patients (N = 339) enrolled in the central and south European countries of the SERCE (Southern Europe, RUC, Central Europe) cluster of CompLEEment-1.Patients and methodsMen and women of any menopausal status with HR+/HER2− ABC received once-daily oral ribociclib 600 mg (3-weeks on/1-week-off), plus letrozole 2.5 mg continuously. Men/premenopausal women also received a GnRH-agonist. The primary outcome was the number of patients with adverse events (AEs) over a timeframe of approximately 36 months. Time-to-progression, overall response rate, and clinical benefit rate were also measured.ResultsSafety results in the SERCE subgroup were consistent with those in the pivotal clinical trials of ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy. Treatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustments/interruption occurred in 63.1% of patients but led to treatment discontinuation in only 10.6%. The most common treatment-related AEs of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia and transaminase elevations. There were no fatal treatment-related events.ConclusionsThese findings from the SERCE subgroup support the safety and manageable tolerability of ribociclib in a broad range of patients with HR+/HER2− ABC more representative of patients in real-world clinical practice.Key words: CDK4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, HR+, HER2−, advanced breast cancer, CompLEEment-1 trial     

Mechanisms of therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer

Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have advanced the treatment of metastatic breast cancer by targeting the cell cycle machinery, interrupting intracellular and mitogenic hormone signals that stimulate proliferation of malignant cells. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that derangements of cyclin D1, CDK4/6, and retinoblastoma expression are common in breast cancer, and suggested a therapeutic benefit from interrupting this axis required for cell cycle progression. Studies of cell lines and animal models of breast cancer have demonstrated the complex interplay between the cell cycle and estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth receptor 2 signaling, which informs our understanding of synergistic use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy, as well as mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy. Interestingly, estrogen receptor activity leads to upregulation of cyclin D1 expression, but the estrogen receptor is also in turn activated by cyclin D1, independent of estrogen binding. Early CDK inhibitors were nonspecific and limited by systemic toxicities, while the current generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Preclinical investigations of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) lend further insight into their mechanism of action, which will hopefully inform the future use and refinement of these therapies. Finally, we summarize evidence for additional novel CDK4/6 inhibitors currently in development.     

Cyclin Pathway Genomic Alterations Across 190,247 Solid Tumors: Leveraging Large‐Scale Data to Inform Therapeutic Directions

BackgroundWe describe the landscape of cyclin and interactive gene pathway alterations in 190,247 solid tumors.MethodsUsing comprehensive genomic profiling (315 genes, >500× coverage), samples were analyzed for alterations in activating/sensitizing cyclin genes (CDK4 amplification, CDK6 amplification, CCND1, CCND2, CCND3, CDKN2B [loss], CDKN2A [loss], SMARCB1), hormone genes (estrogen receptor 1 [ESR1], androgen receptor [AR]), and co‐alterations in genes leading to cyclin inhibitor therapeutic resistance (RB1 and CCNE1).ResultsAlterations in at least one cyclin activating/sensitizing gene occurred in 24% of malignancies. Tumors that frequently harbored at least one cyclin alteration were brain gliomas (47.1%), esophageal (40.3%) and bladder cancer (37.9%), and mesotheliomas (37.9%). The most frequent alterations included CDKN2A (13.9%) and CDKN2B loss (12.5%). Examples of unique patterns of alterations included CCND1 amplification in breast cancer (17.3%); CDK4 alterations in sarcomas (12%); CCND2 in testicular cancer (23.4%), and SMARCB1 mutations in kidney cancer (3% overall, 90% in malignant rhabdoid tumors). Alterations in resistance genes RB1 and CCNE1 affected 7.2% and 3.6% of samples. Co‐occurrence analysis demonstrated a lower likelihood of concomitant versus isolated alterations in cyclin activating/sensitizing and resistance genes (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; p < .001), except in colorectal, cervical, and small intestine cancers. AR and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in prostate cancer co‐occurred more frequently (vs. AR alterations and wild‐type cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations) (OR, 1.79; p < .001) as did ESR1 and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in breast (OR, 1.62; p < .001) and cervical cancer (OR, 4.08; p = .04) (vs. ESR1 and cyclin wild‐type activating/sensitizing alterations).ConclusionCyclin pathway alterations vary according to tumor type/histology, informing opportunities for targeted therapy, including for rare cancers.Implications for PracticeCyclin pathway genomic abnormalities are frequent in human solid tumors, with substantial variation according to tumor site and histology. Opportunities for targeted therapy emerge with comprehensive profiling of this pathway.     

Ribociclib for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive,human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer

Introduction: The emergence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a significant advancement in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable, highly selective inhibitor of CDK4/6. In combination with various endocrine therapies, ribociclib has demonstrated clinical activity as a first-line therapy for patients with HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer, without compromising the favorable toxicity profile associated with endocrine therapy. Thus, ribociclib is now considered a new standard of care for HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer.

Areas covered: This review provides a concise overview of the preclinical and clinical development of ribociclib, including evidence of its clinical activity and safety profile when combined with endocrine therapy in HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer.

Expert commentary: CDK4/6 inhibition represents a promising treatment option for patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer. Ribociclib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving first-line endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer. Planned and ongoing trials investigating ribociclib in combination with other endocrine therapies and in various clinical settings will help to determine the optimal treatment sequence for different patient populations.     

Abemaciclib induces atypical cell death in cancer cells characterized by formation of cytoplasmic vacuoles derived from lysosomes

In the cell cycle, the G₁/S transition is controlled by the cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6‐cyclin D complex. Constitutive activation of CDK4/6 dysregulates G₁/S transition, leading to oncogenic transformation. We found that 3 CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, exerted a cytocidal effect as well as a cytostatic effect at the G₁ phase in cancer cell lines, including A549 human non–small cell lung cancer cells. Among these inhibitors, abemaciclib exhibited the most potent cytotoxic effect. The cell‐death phenotype induced by abemaciclib, which entailed formation of multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles, was not consistent with apoptosis or necroptosis. Abemaciclib blocked autophagic flux, resulting in accumulation of autophagosomes, however vacuole formation and cell death induced by abemaciclib were independent of autophagy. In addition, methuosis, a cell‐death phenotype characterized by vacuole formation induced by excessive macropinocytosis, was excluded because the vacuoles did not incorporate fluorescent dextran. Of note, both formation of vacuoles and induction of cell death in response to abemaciclib were inhibited by vacuolar‐type ATPase (V‐ATPase) inhibitors such as bafilomycin A1 and concanamycin A. Live‐cell imaging revealed that the abemaciclib‐induced vacuoles were derived from lysosomes that expanded following acidification. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that these vacuoles contained undigested debris and remnants of organelles. Cycloheximide chase assay revealed that lysosomal turnover was blocked by abemaciclib. Furthermore, mTORC1 inhibition along with partial lysosomal membrane permeabilization occurred after abemaciclib treatment. Together, these results indicate that, in cancer cells, abemaciclib induces a unique form of cell death accompanied by swollen and dysfunctional lysosomes.