Effect of neutropenia on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab

Trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) is a promising late-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a well-known predictor of FTD/TPI efficacy, whether CIN is a predictive marker of efficacy for FTD/TPI + Bev remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of FTD/TPI + Bev and the predictive markers of its efficacy. Clinical data of patients with mCRC who received FTD/TPI + Bev at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2017 and August 2020 were retrospectively collected. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were assessed. In addition, subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed. In total, 94 patients (median age, 60.0 years; age range, 32–82 years; 37 men and 57 women) were included in the present study. The DCR was 44.7%, the median PFS time was 2.9 months (2.3–4.1 months) and the median OS time was 10.0 months (7.3–11.1 months). Grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment occurred in 27.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with a longer PFS time than those who did not develop CIN [3.8 months (2.3–8.4 months) vs. 2.7 months (1.8–4.0 months); P=0.008]. Furthermore, the DCR was higher in patients with grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment than those without CIN (61.5 vs. 38.2%; P=0.07). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are independent predictors for a longer PFS time (P=0.01). Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are early predictors of the efficacy of FTD/TPI + Bev.     

Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia

Trifluridine/tipiracil is available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine‐, oxaliplatin‐ and irinotecan‐based chemotherapies, anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor agents. This article reviews trifluridine/tipiracil clinical data and presents practical information on its use in the management of refractory mCRC in Australia. Whereas the primary mechanism of action of fluoropyrimidines such as fluorouracil (5‐FU) and capecitabine is enzyme inhibition of nucleotide synthesis, trifluridine/tipiracil primarily acts by incorporation into DNA, resulting in DNA dysfunction. Trifluridine/tipiracil has activity in patients with 5‐FU‐resistant tumors and can be considered in patients with prior intolerance or toxicity to 5‐FU. In the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial evaluating trifluridine/tipiracil in chemotherapy‐refractory mCRC, efficacy benefits were observed across all a priori prognostic subgroups including those defined by age (≥65 and ≥75 years), geographical origin, primary tumor site or KRAS status. Trifluridine/tipiracil therapy benefits appropriately selected patients who have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, with no more than mild hepatic impairment or mild‐to‐moderate renal impairment, and who are capable of adhering to oral therapy safely. Appropriate dosing, monitoring for adverse events and effective management of side effects are essential.     

Real-world effectiveness of regorafenib in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective,observational study

Aim

To evaluate the real-world usage pattern and factors associated with the effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data for 209 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib as third or later line of therapy. TheKaplan–Meier method was used to draw the survival curves. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value for overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 209 patients, 156 (75%) were treated with regorafenib, and 53 (25%) were given regorafenib combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. About 182 (87%) patients had a dose record of regorafenib. The initial daily doses of regorafenib were 160, 120, 80, and 40 mg, accounting for 29%, 17%, 48%, and 6% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11.3 months, and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.3). Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 10.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = .534, 95% CI: .325–.879; p = .014). A total of 49 patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient genotype treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib had a longer OS than the non-PD-1 group (13.5 vs. 9.7 months; HR = .563, p = .027). The median OS of patients continuing treatment with regorafenib after progression (n = 19, with five patients receiving additional immunotherapy) was marginally longer than patients discontinuing regorafenib after progression (12.7 vs. 11.9 months, p = .425) observed in a smaller cohort.

Conclusion

In real-world practice, patients with mCRC in whom standard regimens had failed have a good survival benefit with regorafenib. Combination with PD-1 inhibitor may further prolong survival of the patients.     

Panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil as anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Overall survival and subgroup analysis of the randomized phase II VELO trial

The randomized phase II VELO trial showed that the addition of panitumumab to trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With longer follow-up, final overall survival results and posttreatment subgroup analysis are presented. Sixty-two patients with refractory RAS WT mCRC were randomly assigned to receive, as third-line therapy, trifluridine/tipiracil alone (arm A) or in combination with panitumumab (arm B). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.5-16.7) in arm A compared to 11.6 months (95% CI 6.3-17.0) in arm B (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.71, P = .9). To evaluate the impact of subsequent lines of treatment, subgroup analysis was performed for the 24/30 patients in arm A, that received fourth-line therapy after disease progression. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 1.44-6.83) for 17 patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge as compared to 3.0 months (95% CI 1.61-4.31) for seven patients that received other therapies (HR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.85, P = .024). Median OS from the start of fourth-line treatment was 13.6 months (95% CI 7.2-20), and 5.1 months (95% CI 1.8-8.3) for patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge vs other therapies, respectively (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.81, P = .019). Final results of the VELO trial support the role of anti-EGFR rechallenge in the continuum of care of patients with RAS/BRAF WT mCRC.     

Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands

Background

The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in daily clinical practice in The Netherlands.

Methods

Medical records of patients from 17 centers treated in the trifluridine/tipiracil compassionate use program were reviewed and checked for RECOURSE eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics, safety, and survival times were compared, and prespecified baseline characteristics were tested in multivariate analyses for prognostic significance on overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 136 patients with a median age of 62 years were analyzed. Forty-three patients (32%) did not meet the RECOURSE eligibility criteria for not having received all prior standard treatments (n = 35, 26%) and/or ECOG performance status (PS) 2 (n = 12, 9%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (n = 44, 32%), leukopenia (n = 8, 6%), anemia (n = 7, 5%), and fatigue (n = 7, 5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8–2.3) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.0–6.9), respectively. Patients with ECOG PS 2 had a worse median OS (3.2 months) compared to patients with ECOG PS 0–1 (5.9 months). ECOG PS, KRAS-mutation status, white blood cell count, serum lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase were prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

Our data show that treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil in daily clinical practice is feasible and safe. Differences in patient characteristics between our population and the RECOURSE study population should be taken into account in the interpretation of survival data. Our results argue against the use of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with ECOG PS 2.

Funding

Johannes J.M. Kwakman received an unrestricted research grant from Servier.

     

Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally administrated anticancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer. FTD, a key component of FTD/TPI, exerts antitumor effects via its incorporation into DNA. Using specific antibodies against bromodeoxyuridine, FTD incorporation into DNA is detected in tumors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients with mCRC who are administered FTD/TPI. The proportion of FTD-positive PBMC fluctuates according to the schedule of treatment, although the association between the proportion of FTD-positive PBMC and the clinical outcomes of patients is unknown. To answer this question, here we monitored the FTD-positive PBMC of 39 elderly patients with mCRC enrolled in KSCC1602, a single-arm phase 2 trial of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment, for 1 month, during the first cycle of treatment. The median values and interquartile ranges of the percentage of FTD-positive PBMC on days 8, 15, and 29 were 39.3% (30.7%-52.2%), 66.9% (40.0%-75.3%), and 13.5% (5.7%-26.0%), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the percentage of FTD-positive PBMC on day 8 (the end of the first week of treatment) had moderate ability to accurately diagnose the occurrence of severe neutropenia and leukopenia within 1 month (area under the curve = 0.778 [95% confidence interval, 0.554-0.993]). This result suggests that excess FTD incorporation into PBMC at the initial phase of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab treatment is a risk factor for early onset of severe hematological adverse events.     

Dose-finding study and pharmacogenomic analysis of fixed-rate infusion of gemcitabine, irinotecan and bevacizumab in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Background:

To determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose (RD) and preliminary evidence of activity of escalating doses of irinotecan (CPT-11) fixed-dose-rate infusional gemcitabine (FDR-GMB) and bevacizumab in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Pharmacogenomic analysis was performed to investigate the association between VEGF single-nucleotide polymorphisms and clinical outcome.

Patients and methods:

A total of 89 mCRC patients were recruited in a two-step study design; 28 were included in the dose-finding study and 59 in the pharmacogenomic analysis. The FDR-GMB of 1000 mg m^–2, bevacizumab 5 mg kg^–1 and CPT-11 doses ranging from 100 to 160 mg m^–2 were explored. The VEGF protein serum levels were quantified by EIA. Allelic discrimination was performed to genotype polymorphisms in the VEGF gene.

Results:

CPT-11 RD was 150 mg m^–2. Diarrhoea and neutropenia were the DLT. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were 5.2 and 19.9 months, respectively. VEGF levels were significantly correlated with VEGF-2578AA and VEGF-460CC genotypes, and a trend was observed with VEGF+405GG genotype. The presence of any of these genotypes correlated with a longer median TTP (8.8 vs 4.5 months, P=0.04).

Conclusion:

The triplet combination tested in this study is effective and well tolerated. A possible predictive role for VEGF gene polymorphisms and baseline VEGF circulating levels is suggested.     

转移性结直肠癌患者化疗后血清癌胚抗原水平的变化

目的:观察转移性结直肠癌病人化疗前后血清癌胚抗原(CEA)水平的变化及临床意义。方法:对施行过化疗的转移性结直肠癌病人进行回顾性研究,采用CEA试剂盒以微粒子化学发光免疫分析法测定血清CEA水平,研究CEA的变化及其与一些临床特征之间的关系。结果:67例转移性结直肠癌患者中19例(28.4%)化疗开始后70天内血清CEA有所升高,71天～210天期间再复查时,其CEA水平又降至化疗前水平或更低。影像学检查提示这19例CEA短暂升高的病人均从化疗之中得到益处(11例PR,8例SD)。没有证据支持CEA短暂升高与肿瘤原发部位、肿瘤转移、肿瘤分化之间有明确的关联。结论:某些转移性结直肠癌病人化疗开始后的血清CEA水平可以有一短暂的升高,可能与临床受益有关,尚不能作为肿瘤进展的指征。     

Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany

The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of testing for KRAS mutations before administering EGFR inhibitors such as cetuximab and panitumumab for patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the United States and Germany. We developed a lifetime Markov model of costs and survival associated with treating mCRC patients to assess the impact of KRAS testing before administering EGFR inhibitor-containing chemotherapy regimens. Overall, combination therapies involving cetuximab plus irinotecan/FOLFIRI had a better life expectancy (25.83 weeks) than cetuximab or panitumumab alone. Use of KRAS testing (assuming KRAS mutant patients receive only irinotecan) was equally effective and saved $12,428 per patient in the United States. When KRAS mutant patients received best supportive care, the life expectancy decreased slightly (24.26 weeks vs. 25.83 weeks) and the costs decreased by $13,501 in the United States and €9,560 in Germany. For patients treated with cetuximab alone, use of KRAS testing to identify mutations lowered costs by $8,040 per patient in the U.S. analysis and €3,856 per patient in the German analysis. For patients treated with panitumumab alone, use of KRAS testing to identify mutations lowered costs by $7,546 per patient in the U.S. analysis and €4,612 per patient in the German analysis. Model results were sensitive to the cost of chemotherapy regimens and the prevalence of KRAS mutations in the population. Under most scenarios, using KRAS testing to select patients for EGFR inhibitor therapy saved $7,500-$12,400 per patient in the United States and €3,900-€9,600 per patient in Germany with equivalent clinical outcomes.     

First-line trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival analysis in the TASCO1 study

Background Therapeutic options are limited in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The use of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) in this setting was evaluated in the TASCO1 trial; here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results.Methods TASCO1 was an open-label, non-comparative phase II trial. Patients (n = 153) were randomised 1:1 to TT-B (trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12, and bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B; capecitabine, 1250 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle). Final OS was analysed when all patients had either died or withdrawn from the study. Adjusted multivariate regression was used to investigate the effects of pre-specified variables on OS.Results At 1 September 2020, median OS was 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.0–23.7) with TT-B and 17.7 months (95% CI: 12.6–19.8) with C-B (adjusted HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.10). No variables negatively affected OS with TT-B. Safety results were consistent with prior findings.Conclusions TT-B is a promising therapeutic regimen in mCRC patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.Clinical trial information {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02743221","term_id":"NCT02743221"}}NCT02743221 (clinicaltrials.gov)Subject terms: Colorectal cancer, Colorectal cancer     

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Purpose:To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given on a weekly schedule including fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), to define the toxicity profile of this regimen and to find preliminary evidence of its activity in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and methods: Twenty-one patients with progressive disease, treated with fluoropyrimidines and with histologically measurable MCRC entered into this phase I study. Fixed doses of LV (500 mg/m²) followed by a 48-hour 5-FU 2600 mg/m² infusion (5-FU_48h) were administered with escalating doses of L-OHP, starting from 60 mg/m² and with stepwise increments of 5 mg/m². No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Treatment was given once a week for four consecutive weeks, followed by a one-week rest period. Results:Three dose levels were tested. The MTD was L-OHP 70 mg/m² since two of the three patients showed dose-limiting diarrhea and the third developed neutropenia during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive neurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Treatment delays were necessary for a total of 42 cases, but only in 11 of 42 after the pre-arranged 10% dose reduction of 5-FU (2300 mg/m²). Sixteen patients were evaluable for response: seven (33%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.6%–57.0%) were considered to show a major response (one complete), six showed a stable disease, and in addition progressive disease was observed in three patients. Conclusions:Our results show that L-OHP, LV and 5-FU can be administered safely and repetitively using a weekly schedule. Diarrhea and neutropenia are the DLT of this regimen. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in chemotherapy-naïve MCRC patients. The doses recommended for phase II trials are: L-OHP 65 mg/m², LV 500 mg/m² and 5-FU_48h 2300 mg/m² infusion given on a weekly-times-four schedule followed by a one-week rest period.     

Historical perspective: Two decades of progress in treating metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. While screening methods strive to improve rates of early stage detection, 25% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, with the most common sites being the liver, lung, and peritoneum. While once perceived as hopeless, the last two decades have seen substantial strides in the medical, surgical, and regional therapies to treat metastatic disease offering significant improvements in survival.     

Real-world safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan: Postmarketing surveillance

Postmarketing surveillance of Japanese patients with unresectable, previously treated, advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab was undertaken during the conditional approval period. The study aim was to evaluate the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events of nivolumab in the real world. Patients were registered between December 2015 and March 2016 at 536 sites. Nivolumab was given intravenously (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks); the observation period was 12 months after the first dose of nivolumab. Patients were evaluated for safety (n = 3601; 18.2% ≥75 years, 22.4% ECOG performance status ≥2) and effectiveness (n = 3570). The frequencies of any grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were 47.1% and 15.9%, respectively. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were interstitial lung disease (6.4%), hypothyroidism (5.7%), and diarrhea (4.4%). Treatment-related adverse events of special interest (priority items) occurring at a frequency of 5% or more were adverse events related to interstitial lung disease, thyroid dysfunction, liver dysfunction, colitis/severe diarrhea, infusion reaction, and infusion reaction within 24 hours. Significant risk factors for these priority items were identified by competing risk analysis: interstitial lung disease (previous/comorbid interstitial lung disease, abnormal findings on chest imaging, and smoking history); liver dysfunction (previous/comorbid liver disease, smoking history, and metastasis); thyroid dysfunction (previous/comorbid thyroid disease and performance status); and colitis/severe diarrhea (treatment line 2 vs ≥3). The 12-month survival rate was 40.7%. In conclusion, the safety profile of nivolumab in this postmarketing surveillance was similar to that in clinical trials, and no new safety signals were identified. The study was registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (clinicaltrials.jp: Japic-163271).     

A post-marketing safety study of ramucirumab with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundRamucirumab [human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 monoclonal antibody] + levofolinate, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in Japan based on the results from the phase 3 RAISE trial ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01183780","term_id":"NCT01183780"}}NCT01183780). However, safety information of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI in the real-world setting is limited. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the safety of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI under routine clinical practice in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsA single-arm, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study was conducted between August 2016 and May 2020. Patients with mCRC treated with ramucirumab + FOLFIRI for the first time were included. Patients were observed for 12 months from the start of ramucirumab. Data were recorded using the electronic data capture system.ResultsIn total, 362 patients with a mean age of 64.1 years were evaluated for safety, of whom 355 patients were evaluated for effectiveness. A higher proportion of the patients were males (n=200; 55.2%), had metastases and recurrent sites (n=362, 100.0%), and had received prior anti-cancer treatment (n=355; 98.1%). Approximately 83.7% (n=303) and 25.4% (n=92) of patients had medication history of bevacizumab and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, respectively. Overall, 84.3% (n=305) of patients experienced any grade adverse events (AEs). Neutrophil count decreased (n=138; 38.1%), hypertension (n=58; 16.0%), and diarrhea (n=57; 15.7%) were observed frequently. The clinically relevant grade ≥3 AEs of special interest (AESIs) with >2% incidence included neutropenia (n=101; 27.9%), hypertension (n=35; 9.7%), proteinuria (n=23; 6.4%), hepatic dysfunction (n=15; 4.1%), febrile neutropenia (n=10; 2.8%), and leukopenia (n=9; 2.5%). The presence of renal disease at baseline increased the risk of proteinuria [risk ratio: 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–4.2]. Three deaths were reported due to AEs, of which 1 was study treatment related. The 12-month survival rate of the ramucirumab + FOLFIRI regimen was 59%, mortality mainly (90%) occurring due to progressive disease.ConclusionsAlthough the current observational study enrolled patients with various medication history, the regimen of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI was manageable under clinical practice. No new safety concerns beyond the findings observed in previous clinical trials were reported.