The function of passive stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint--a biomechanical study

In a biomechanical study we evaluated the passive stabilizing ligaments of 9 fresh shoulder specimens with mercury bands. While preparing the specimens we found two interesting entities: there are fibers of the coracohumeral ligament running from the humeral head to the coracoacromial ligament and there was an reproducible thickening in the posterior joint capsule. Functional evaluation shows that the coracohumeral ligament limits external rotation independently of the amount of abduction as well as inferior subluxation. The mediale glenohumeral ligament shows the highest tension in external rotation and 30 degrees abduction. The anterior inferior ligament strengthens the joint capsule in abduction and external rotation. The posterior inferior ligament shows the highest tension in abduction and internal rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Immobilization in internal rotation and adduction may lead to shortening of the coracohumeral ligament, which may result in severe limitation of external rotation and abduction. Resection of the coracoacromial ligament relaxes the coracohumeral ligament leading to an increased cranio-caudal instability. The posterior inferior ligament is complementary to the anterior inferior ligament thus stabilizing the shoulder joint in abduction and internal rotation. Sparing this structure in arthroscopy with dorsal portals and restoring in the case of a rupture seems to be of value for a normal joint function.     

Effect of rotator interval closure on glenohumeral stability and motion: a cadaveric study

The effect of rotator interval closure, which is performed as an adjunct to arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder, has not been clarified. Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. The position of the humeral head was measured using an electromagnetic tracking device with the capsule intact, sectioned, and imbricated between the superior glenohumeral ligament and the subscapularis tendon (SGHL/SSC closure) or between the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments (SGHL/MGHL closure). The direction of translational loads (10, 20, and 30 N) and arm positions were (1) anterior, posterior, and inferior loads in adduction; (2) anterior load in abduction/external rotation in the scapular plane; and (3) anterior load in abduction/external rotation in the coronal plane. The range of motion was measured using a goniometer under a constant force. Both methods reduced anterior translation in adduction. Only SGHL/MGHL closure reduced anterior translation in abduction/external rotation in the scapular plane and posterior translation in adduction. Both methods reduced the range of external rotation and horizontal abduction. Rotator interval closure is expected to reduce remnant anterior/posterior instability and thereby improve the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization procedures.     

Dynamic capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint

Though many anatomic and biomechanical studies have been performed to elucidate capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint, no previous studies have evaluated capsuloligamentous anatomy during rotator cuff contraction. The purpose of this study was to define and document the orientation and interrelationship between the glenohumeral ligaments during simulated rotator cuff contraction. Six fresh cadaveric shoulders were arthroscoped to document and grade ligamentous anatomy. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments and the anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex were labeled by an arthroscopicassisted technique with a linked metallic bead system. Shoulders were then placed onto an experimental apparatus that simulated rotator cuff function through computer-controlled servo-hydrolic actuators attached to the rotator cuff and biceps by a clamp and cable-and-pulley system. Simulated rotator cuff action and manual placement allowed shoulders to be placed into three positions of rotation (neutral, internal, and external) in three positions of scapular plane abduction (0°, 45°, 90°). Anteroposterior and axillary lateral plane radiographs were taken in each position to document orientation of all four ligaments. Both the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments were maximally lengthened in 0° and 45° abduction and external rotation and appeared to shorten in all positions of abduction. The anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex maintained a cruciate orientation in all positions of abduction in the anteroposterior plane, except at 90° abduction and external rotation, where they are parallel. This cruciate orientation is due to the different location of the glenoid origin and humeral insertion of each band and may allow reciprocal tightening of each during rotation. The glenohumeral capsule is composed of discreet ligaments that undergo large charges in orientation during rotation. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments appear to complement the inferior glenohumeral ligaments, with the former tightening in adduction and the latter tightening in abduction. This relationship permits the large range of motion normally seen in the glenohumeral joint.     

Functional study of glenohumeral ligaments

BackgroundThe glenohumeral ligaments are passive stabilising anatomical structures of the shoulder which, in synergy with the other active and passive stabilising structures, enable joint movement and cohesion. The purpose of this study is to analyse the isolated and synergic function of the glenohumeral ligaments by using a tetrapolar detection system with computer analysis.MethodsIn a study performed on cadavers after anatomical dissection, detector electrodes were positioned on the individual ligaments and recordings were made of bioelectric impedance and, consequently, the resistance, which is an indicator of the state of tension or relaxation of the ligamentous complex. Predefined positions of the upper limb were adopted—neutral adduction, adduction with external rotation, abduction at 45° with neutral and external rotation, and abduction at 90° with neutral and external rotation.ResultsThe superior glenohumeral ligament is important in stabilisation of the glenohumeral joint in adduction and external rotation. The middle glenohumeral ligament is an important stabilising structure in the positions of adduction and external rotation and abduction up to 45° in external rotation. The resistance, and therefore tension, of the inferior glenohumeral ligament, which is negligible in positions of neutral adduction and adduction in external rotation, increases in value for angles between 45° and 90°, indicating the important stabilising function of this ligament in those positions.ConclusionOur experimental study on cadavers, which involved evaluating the resistance of the glenohumeral ligaments by means of tetrapolar detection and computer analysis of the results, contributes to our knowledge of the functional activity of the anterior portion of the joint capsule.     

Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: a biomechanical study

The purpose of this study was to determine change in glenohumeral joint translation after release of the coracoacromial ligament. Six fresh, frozen unpaired glenohumeral joints were tested in a neutral position and at 30 degrees internal and 30 degrees external rotation of the humerus at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction on a custom glenohumeral joint translation testing apparatus. A joint compression load of 20 N was simulated; then a 15-N load was applied to the humerus in anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior directions, and translations on the glenoid were measured with an electromagnetic tracking device. The tests were then repeated after a 1.5-cm section of the coracoacromial ligament was released from the acromion. A multivariate analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses with a P value of.05 as the level of significance. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees of abduction, release of the coracoacromial ligament resulted in a significant increase in glenohumeral joint translations, in both the anterior and inferior directions. In addition, the differences in translation between before and after the release of the coracoacromial ligament decreased in all directions as glenohumeral abduction increased, and they were not significant at 60 degrees of abduction in any of the rotations. The results of this study suggest that the coracoacromial ligament has a role in static restraint of the glenohumeral joint. It provides a suspension function and may restrain anterior and inferior translations through an interaction with the coracohumeral ligament. Although this is a biomechanical study without simulation of the shoulder muscles, it indicates that the coracoacromial ligament contributes to glenohumeral stability. Caution should be exercised in the release of the coracoacromial ligament in those with rotator cuff pain associated with glenohumeral instability.     

Passive glenohumeral joint stabilization: A biomechanical study

Passive glenohumeral joint stability was tested in 10 cadaveric shoulder specimens, before and after venting of the intraarticulor space. Force-displacement diagrams were measured with anterior, posterior, and inferior excursion, in neutral position, in 90° of abduction, and in a combination of 90° of abduction and 90° of external rotation. Displacement at 50 Ns before venting averaged 11.17 mm posteriorly (SD = 6.48 mm), 7.15 mm anteriorly (SD = 5.51 mm), and 3.41 mm inferiorly (SD = 3.37 mm). Venting of the joint increased displacement by 47% anteriorly, 49% posteriorly, and 61 % inferiorly. In addition, mathematic model calculation was used to estimate the destabilizing forces at the glenohumeral joint during physiologic arm motion. This force approximated 970 N, cldarly more than passive stabilizers alone seem to be able to provide. It is therefore assumed that, in addition to passive joint stability, active stabilization plays a major role at the glenohumeral joint.     

Effect of selective capsulorrhaphy on the passive range of motion of the glenohumeral joint

BACKGROUND: Capsulorrhaphy of the glenohumeral joint is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of instability caused by increased capsular laxity. The effect of capsulorrhaphy on the range of motion of the shoulder is poorly understood. METHODS: We simulated localized capsular contractures by selective capsular plications in eight human cadaveric shoulders and studied the effect of such plications on the passive range of glenohumeral abduction, flexion, and external and internal rotation in different degrees of abduction. A 0.5 or 1-N-m torque was applied to the humerus, and the range of glenohumeral motion was measured with electronic goniometers in three planes and compared with those of the intact shoulder. RESULTS: Anterosuperior capsular plication most markedly affected external rotation of the adducted arm, decreasing it by a mean of 30.1 degrees (p < 0.0001). Anteroinferior plication significantly reduced abduction by a mean of 19.4 degrees (p < 0.0001) and external rotation by a mean of 20.6 degrees (p = 0.0046). Posterosuperior plication mostly limited internal rotation of the adducted arm (mean decrease, 16.1 degrees, p = 0.0045). On the average, total anterior and total posterior plication each limited flexion by approximately 20 degrees (p = 0.005) and abduction by >or=15 degrees (p < 0.005), whereas total anterior plication limited external rotation by >30 degrees (p 20 degrees (p < 0.0001). Total inferior capsular plication restricted abduction (by a mean of 27.7 degrees, p = 0.0001), flexion, and rotation. Total superior plication restricted external rotation and flexion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Localized plications of the glenohumeral joint capsule lead to predictable patterns of loss of glenohumeral mobility. If plication is planned, losses of movement can be anticipated. The findings of this study may assist surgeons in identifying the parts of the capsule that are contracted and that may need lengthening.     

Prolonged immobilization in abduction and neutral rotation for a first-episode anterior shoulder dislocation

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: Patients who sustain first-episode anterior glenohumeral dislocations are at risk to develop chronic glenohumeral instability. Current treatment options after an initial anterior glenohumeral dislocation include immediate surgery, delayed surgery, or conservative interventions such as immobilization and strengthening exercises. Duration of immobilization is variable among formal studies. Recent research suggests that typical immobilization positions may not allow adequate healing and in fact may promote glenohumeral joint instability. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 19-year-old male who sustained a first-episode anterior glenohumeral dislocation during athletic activity. Physical therapy management included a longer-than-typical period of immobilization and protected activity to allow for more complete healing. The shoulder abduction and neutral rotation immobilization position used with this patient may increase healing of structures that influence stability of the shoulder OUTCOMES: At 13 weeks after the dislocation, the patient had full active and passive range of motion, near normal strength, and no complaints of pain or instability. At a 20-month follow-up the patient had resumed full activities of daily living including recreational sports without symptoms of instability. DISCUSSION: Conservative intervention options for first-episode anterior shoulder dislocations need further study. Immobilization and protected activity periods should be adequate to allow for complete healing. The optimal positions for immobilization should be determined and implemented.     

Anterior shoulder stability: Contributions of rotator cuff forces and the capsular ligaments in a cadaver model

The purpose of this study was to quantify in a biomechanical model the contributions to shoulder joint stability that are made by tensions in the four tendons of the rotator cuff and by static resistance of defined portions of the capsular ligaments. A materials testing machine was used to directly determine anterior joint laxity by measurement of the force required to produce a standard anterior subluxation. Shoulders were tested in external or neutral humeral rotation. Data were analyzed by multiway analysis of variance with regression analysis. This model simulated tensions in the rotator cuff musculature by applying static loads at the tendon insertion sites acting along the anatomic lines of action. A load in any of the cuff tendons resulted in a measurable and statistically significant contribution to anterior joint stability. The contributions between different tendons were not significantly different and did not depend on the humeral rotation (neutral or external). In neutral humeral rotation the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments together function equally with the inferior glenohumeral ligament as primary stabilizers against anterior humeral translation. The posterior capsule is a secondary stabilizer. The external rotation of the abducted humerus increases anterior stability by more than doubling the stability contribution from the inferior glenohumeral ligament. The stability contribution from the posterior capsule is larger in external rotation than in neutral rotation but is still of secondary magnitude. In external rotation the stability contribution of the anterior capsule, including the superior glenohumeral ligament and the middle glenohumeral ligament, becomes insignificant. The model presented here simulates the combined effect of two major sources of shoulder stability. This versatile model permits the direct measurement of the contributions to anterior shoulder stability that are made by tensions in the rotator cuff tendons and by static resistance of defined capsular zones. The use of multiple regression analysis-a standard statistical technique but one relatively new to the orthopaedic literature-permits quantitative determination of the contribution of each independent variable to the dependent variable, shoulder stability.     

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the inferior glenohumeral ligament: non-arthrographic imaging in abduction and external rotation

The anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament is the most important restraint for preventing traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. The condition of this ligament markedly affects the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair. We compared non-arthrographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in abduction and external rotation and arthroscopic findings of the ligament in 51 shoulders with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. The condition of the ligament was evaluated based on the presence of a thick low-signal band between the anterior labrum and the head of the humerus in all magnetic resonance images obtained from the 3- to 5-o'clock position of the glenoid rim (right shoulder). The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI evaluation were 94% and 82%, respectively. MRI in abduction and external rotation is fairly useful for predicting the condition of the ligament in advance of invasive measures (ie, arthroscopy).     

Reconstruction of the antero-superior shoulder capsule with the subscapularis tendon: A case report

A 14-year-old boy presented with recurrent, anteroinferior, and multidirectional instability of his dominant shoulder. Examination with the patient under anesthesia demonstrated marked anterior and inferior translation when drawer testing was performed in adduction; however, abduction of the shoulder reduced the magnitude of humeral head translation in both these directions. Arthroscopy and open surgical dissection revealed the absence of any capsuloligamentous structures above the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex. This superior capsular defect could not be closed by a capsular shift procedure; therefore it was reconstructed with a portion of the subscapularis tendon. This case provides a clinical correlation of capsular anatomy with laxity on drawer testing. The glenohumeral laxity documented on examination with the patient under anesthesia supports experimental ligament-cutting studies that suggest the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex is the important stabilizer in abduction, whereas the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments are more important in adduction.     

In situ force distribution in the glenohumeral joint capsule during anterior-posterior loading.

Our objective was to examine the function of the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments during application of an anterior-posterior load by directly measuring the in situ force distribution in these structures as well as the compliance of the joint. We hypothesized that interaction between different regions of the capsule due to its continuous nature results in a complex force distribution throughout the glenohumeral joint capsule. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the force distribution in the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments of intact shoulder specimens and the joint kinematics resulting from the application of external loads at four abduction angles. Our results suggest that the glenohumeral capsule carries no force when the humeral head is centered in the glenoid with the humerus in anatomic rotation. However, once an anterior-posterior load is applied to the joint, the glenohumeral ligaments carry force (during anterior loading, the superior glenohumeral-coracohumeral ligaments carried 26+/-16 N at 0 degrees and the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament carried 30+/-21 N at 90 degrees). Therefore, the patient's ability to use the arm with the humerus in anatomic rotation should not be limited following repair procedures for shoulder instability because the repaired capsuloligamentous structures should not carry force during this motion. Separation of the capsule into its components revealed that forces are being transmitted between each region and that the glenohumeral ligaments do not act as traditional ligaments that carry a pure tensile force along their length. The interrelationship of the glenohumeral ligaments forms the biomechanical basis for the capsular shift procedure. The compliance of the joint under our loading conditions indicates that the passive properties of the capsule provide little resistance to motion of the humerus during 10 mm of anterior or posterior translation with anatomic humeral rotation. Finally, this knowledge also enhances the understanding of arm positioning relative to the portion of the glenohumeral capsule that limits translation during examination under anesthesia.     

Biomechanical tests for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder joint before and after arthroscopic repair

Superior labral anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions can cause shoulder pain partly by causing glenohumeral instability. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a simulated type II SLAP lesion and subsequent repair on glenohumeral translation of the vented shoulder. In eight cadaver joints, a robotic/UFS testing system was used to measure joint translation by applying an anterior, posterior, or inferior load of 50 N to each shoulder. The "apprehension tests" for anterior and posterior instability were simulated by applying an anterior load of 50 N with an external rotation torque of 3 Nm or a posterior load of 50 N with an internal rotation torque of 3 Nm. Each loading condition was applied at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction with a constant joint compressive load (44 N) to the intact, simulated SLAP lesion, and repaired shoulder. Repair of the type II SLAP was then performed by placing a Suretac through the labrum both anterior and posterior to the biceps anchor and testing was repeated. ANOVA was used to compare translation of the intact joint, the joint after the type II SLAP lesion had been simulated, and after repair. At 30 degrees of abduction, anterior translation of the intact vented shoulder joint from anterior loading was 18.7+/-8.5 mm and increased to 26.2+/-6.5 mm after simulation of the type II SLAP lesion ( p< or =0.05). The arthroscopic repair did not restore anterior translation (23.9+/-8.6 mm) to the same degree as the intact joint ( p> or =0.05). At 60 degrees of abduction, anterior translation of 16.6+/-9.6mm in the intact joint was not significantly increased at 19.4+/-10.1 after simulation of the type II SLAP lesion ( p=0.0527). AP loading also resulted in inferior translation. At 30 degrees of abduction it was 3.8+/-4.0 mm in the intact joint and increased to 8.5+/-5.4 mm after the type II SLAP lesion ( p< or =0.05. After repair the inferior translation decreased significantly to 6.7+/-5.3 mm ( p< or =0.05). Although inferior translations were less at 60 degrees of abduction, results were similar to those at 30 degrees after repair. There were no significant increases in translation after SI/AP combined external rotation torque or posterior-anterior combined internal rotation torque loading.In this study the repair of a type II SLAP lesion only partially restored translations to the same degree as an intact vented shoulder joint. Therefore, improved repair techniques or an anteroinferior capsulolabral procedure in addition to the type II SLAP lesion repair might be needed to restore normal joint function.     

The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement

The articular surface of the normal humeral head has a variable posterior and medial offset with respect to the central axis of the humeral shaft. Recreation of the normal humeral head shaft offset is postulated to be an important consideration during shoulder arthroplasty. However, the effect of humeral head malposition is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. Twenty-one human cadavers were dissected and tested with the use of an active or passive shoulder model. Range of motion and translation were recorded by means of an electromagnetic tracking device. The experiment was performed in 2 phases. For kinematics study, 11 cadaver shoulders were positioned both passively and actively from maximum internal rotation to maximum external rotation at 90 degrees of total elevation in the scapular plane. Three rotator cuff and 3 deltoid muscle lines of action were simulated for active joint positioning. Passive joint positioning was accomplished with the use of a torque wrench and a nominal centering force. The testing protocol was used for the natural joint as well as for 9 prosthetic head locations: centered and 2- and 4-mm offsets in the anterior, posterior, inferior, and superior directions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in the range of motion and translation between active and passive positioning of the natural joint as well as all prosthetic head positions. (2) For impingement study, 10 cadaver shoulders were used in a passive model, loading the tendons of the rotator cuff with a 30-N centering force. The humerus was passively rotated from maximum internal rotation (1500 Nmm) to maximum external rotation (1500 Nmm) by means of a continuous-recording digital torque wrench. Trials were performed with the use of centered, 4-, 6-, and 8-mm offset heads in the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior positions before and after removal of the acromion and coracoacromial ligament. The relation between change in mean peak torque (with and without acromion), passive range of motion, and humeral head offset was analyzed by means of repeated-measures analysis of variance. In the kinematics study, total range of motion and all humeral translations were greater with passive joint positioning than with active positioning (P =.01) except for total superior-inferior translation and superior-inferior translation in external rotation. Anterior to posterior humeral head offset was associated with statistically significant changes in total range of motion (P =.02), range of internal rotation (P =.02), range of external rotation (P =.0001), and total anterior-posterior translation (P =.01). Superior to inferior humeral head offset resulted in statistically significant changes in total range of motion (P =.02), range of internal rotation (P =.0001), anterior-posterior translation during external rotation (P =.01), and total superior-inferior translation (P =.03). In the impingement study, there was a significant increase in torque from centered to 4-mm inferior offset (P =.006), 6-mm inferior offset (P <.001), and 8-mm inferior offset (P <.001). There was no significant increase in torque with superior, anterior, and posterior offsets. Glenohumeral motion significantly decreased from 129 degrees for centered head to 119 degrees for 8-mm superior (P =.002), 119 degrees for 8-mm anterior (P =.014), 118 degrees for 8-mm inferior (P <.001), and 114 degrees for 8-mm posterior (P =.001). Humeral articular malposition of 4 mm or less during prosthetic arthroplasty of the glenohumeral joint may lead to small alterations in humeral translations and range of motion. Inferior malposition of greater than 4 mm can lead to increased subacromial contact; offset of 8 mm in any direction results in significant decreases in passive range of motion. Therefore if subacromial contact is to be minimized and glenohumeral motion maximized after shoulder replacement, anatomic reconstruction of the humeral head-humeral shaft offset to within 4 mm is desirable.     

The effect of radiofrequency thermal capsulorrhaphy on glenohumeral translation, rotation, and volume

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of radiofrequency (RF) thermal capsulorrhaphy on the kinematic properties of the glenohumeral joint as determined by changes in resistance to multidirectional translational forces, alteration in the range of internal and external rotation, and changes in glenohumeral joint volume. Nonablative RF thermal energy was used to contract the glenohumeral joint capsule in 6 cadaveric shoulders. Measurements of translation were made after application of a 30-N load in anterior, posterior, and inferior directions. The maximum arc of internal and external rotation after application of a 1-N-m moment was also determined for vented specimens before and after thermal capsulorrhaphy. The percent reduction in glenohumeral capsular volume was measured by use of a saline solution injection-aspiration technique. Capsular shrinkage resulted in reductions in anterior, posterior, and inferior translation. The largest percent reductions in anterior translation were seen in external rotation at 45 degrees (48%, P <.05) and 90 degrees (41%, P <.05) abduction. For inferior translation, the largest percent reductions were seen in internal rotation at 45 degrees (40%, P <.05) and 90 degrees (45%, P <.05) abduction. Reductions in posterior translation were noted in internal rotation at 45 degrees (27%, P <.05) and 90 degrees (26%, P <.05) abduction. Other changes in translation were observed but were not statistically significant. The maximum arc of humeral rotation was reduced by a mean of 14 degrees at 45 degrees abduction and 9 degrees at 90 degrees abduction. The mean percent reduction in capsular volume for all shoulders was 37% (range, 8%-50%). This could not be correlated with percent reductions in translation and rotation. This study demonstrated the significant effect of RF thermal capsulorrhaphy in reducing glenohumeral multidirectional translation and volume with only a small loss of rotation in cadaveric shoulders.     

The glenohumeral micromotion and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation in varying abduction angle

BackgroundThe patients with shoulder instability or disorders in overhead athletes have been considered to have an abnormal micromotion at the glenohumeral joint. However, the normal range of the micromotion has not been available during axial rotation with various abduction angles, especially above 90° abduction. This study aimed to investigate the glenohumeral translation and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation with up to maximum abduction.MethodsFourteen healthy volunteers performed active axial rotations at 0°, 90°, 135°, and maximal abduction angles. The positions of the humeral head center relative to the glenoid at maximally external, neutral, and maximally internal rotations (ER, NR, IR, respectively) for each abduction angle were evaluated using two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) shape matching registration techniques. The shortest pathway and its length between the origin and insertion of the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments (SGHL, MGHL, and IGHL, respectively) were calculated for each position.ResultsThe glenohumeral joint showed 3.1 mm of superoinferior translation during axial rotation at 0° abduction (P < 0.0001), and 2.6 mm and 4.5 mm anteroposterior translation at 135° and maximal abduction (P < 0.0001), respectively. The SGHL and MGHL reached a maximum length at ER with 0° abduction, and the anterior and posterior bands of the IGHL reached a maximum at ER with 90° abduction and IR with 0° abduction.ConclusionsThese findings indicated that the SGHL played a role as an inferior suppressor at 0° abduction, while the anterior band of IGHL played a role as an anterior stabilizer at 90° abduction. Every glenohumeral ligament did not get taut and the anteroposterior translation became greater with increasing abduction angle, above 90°. These results could be used as a reference when comparing with the pathological shoulders in the future study.     

Anatomy and function of the glenohumeral ligaments in anterior shoulder instability

The anatomy of the glenohumeral ligaments has been shown to be complex and variable and their function is highly dependent on the position of the humerus with respect to the glenoid. The superior glenohumeral ligament with the coracohumeral ligament was shown to be an important stabilizer in the inferior direction, even though the coracohumeral ligament is much more robust than the superior glenohumeral ligament. The middle glenohumeral ligament provides anterior stability at 45 degrees and 60 degrees abduction whereas the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex is the most important stabilizer against anteroinferior shoulder dislocation. Therefore, this component of the capsule is the most frequently injured structure. An appropriate surgical procedure to repair the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex after shoulder dislocation must be considered. In addition, a detached labrum can lead to recurrent anterior instability and a compromised inferior glenohumeral ligament complex. However, additional capsular injury usually is necessary to allow anterior dislocation.     

Humeral head translation decreases with muscle loading

This study was conducted to determine the effect of in vitro passive and active loading on humeral head translation during glenohumeral abduction. A shoulder simulator produced unconstrained active abduction of the humerus in 8 specimens. Loading of the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, and anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid muscles was simulated by use of 4 different sets of loading ratios. Significantly greater translations of the humeral head occurred both in 3 dimensions (P < .001) and in the sagittal plane (P < .005) during passive motion when compared with active motion from 30 degrees to 70 degrees of abduction. In the sagittal plane, passive abduction experienced a resultant translation of 3.8 +/- 1.0 mm whereas the active loading ratios averaged 2.3 +/- 1.0 mm. There were no significant differences in the translations that were produced by the 4 sets of muscle-loading ratios used to achieve active motions. This study emphasizes the importance of the musculature in maintaining normal ball-and-socket kinematics of the shoulder.     

The hyperabduction test

We studied 100 fresh human shoulders in cadavers (mean age 76 years), and the range of passive abduction (RPA) in 100 volunteers with normal shoulders and in 90 patients with instability of the joint, over a period of six years. The anatomical and clinical findings showed that passive abduction occurs within the glenohumeral joint only, is controlled by the inferior glenohumeral ligament and has a constant value in 95% of both shoulders in normal subjects. In patients with instability, 85% showed an RPA of over 105 degrees with 90 degrees in the contralateral shoulder. In the remaining patients a strongly positive apprehension test suggested a diagnosis of instability. An RPA of more than 105 degrees is associated with lengthening and laxity of the inferior glenohumeral ligament.     

Function of the 3 portions of the inferior glenohumeral ligament: A cadaveric study

The stabilizing function of the inferior glenohumeral ligament of the anterior band and posterior band has been investigated, but little is known about the function of the axillary pouch. The strain of the 3 portions of the inferior glenohumeral ligament in 17 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders was measured with use of linear transducers. The measurements were performed under the following conditions: 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees of glenohumeral elevation in the coronal, scapular, and sagittal planes and internal to external rotations in 10 degrees increments. The anterior band and axillary pouch showed significant strain increases when the arm was elevated and externally rotated in the coronal and scapular planes but no increase in the sagittal plane. The posterior band showed no strain in the coronal and scapular planes, but a significant strain increase with the arm elevated and internally rotated in the sagittal plane. We conclude that the anterior band and axillary pouch, which showed the greatest strain in abduction and external rotation, are anterior stabilizers, whereas the posterior band, which showed the greatest strain in flexion and internal rotation, is a posterior stabilizer. We recommend that the 6 o'clock position be firmly repaired during the Bankart procedure.