脑膜瘤 p16INK4a、RB基因的甲基化分析及对基因表达的影响

目的　检测脑膜瘤中发生 p16 INK4 a和 RB基因甲基化的情况及对蛋白表达的影响。方法　用甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应对 5 0例脑膜瘤进行了 p16 INK4 a和 RB的甲基化分析 ;并对其中的 2 5例检测了p16 INK4 a蛋白的表达。结果　良性脑膜瘤中没有检测到甲基化 ,分别有 6例 级 ( 37.5 % )和 4例 级( 2 8.6 % )肿瘤发生至少一种基因的甲基化 ,其中有 1例不典型脑膜瘤同时发生了两种基因的甲基化。全部13例 p16 INK4 a阳性表达的肿瘤都是没有检测到甲基化者。结论　p16 INK4 a或 RB的甲基化与不典型和间变性脑膜瘤的发生发展有关 ,其机制可能是甲基化使蛋白表达丢失并导致 p16 INK4 a/细胞周期蛋白 D1/ CDK4 /RB途径功能障碍     

胃癌中p16INK4a基因启动子高甲基化及其蛋白表达

目的探讨胃癌中p16^INK4a基因失活的主要分子机制及其与胃癌发生、发展的关系。方法采用甲基化特异性PCR技术检测62例胃癌和癌旁组织及10例慢性胃炎黏膜p16^INK4a基因启动子区CpG岛甲基化状态,用免疫组化EnVision两步法检测p16^INK4a蛋白的表达。结果62例胃癌和癌旁组织p16^INK4a基因启动子高甲基化率分别为51．6％（32／62）和19.4％（12／62）,10例正常对照胃黏膜未发现高甲基化,胃癌组织p16^INK4a基因启动子高甲基化率高于癌旁组织和正常对照（P〈0．05）。58.1％（36／62）的胃癌组织p16^INK4a蛋白表达阴性,其中72.2％（26／36）的病例具有p16^INK4a基因启动子的高甲基化,p16^INK4a基因启动子的高甲基化与其蛋白失表达密切相关（P〈0.05）。结论胃癌中p16^INK4a基因启动子的高甲基化是p16^INK4a基因失活的主要机制,并可能是胃癌发生中的早期分子事件。     

软组织平滑肌肉瘤中p16基因的甲基化检测

目的 探讨软组织平滑肌肉瘤（ＬＭＳ）中p16基因ＩＮＫ４Ａ的甲基化状态及其与p16表达的关系。方法 应用ＭＳＰ法检测３８例软组织平滑肌肉瘤,１０例平滑肌瘤及５例正常平滑肌组织中p16基因ＩＮＫ４Ａ的甲基化状态,用免疫组织化学ＳＰ方法检测p16蛋白表达情况。结果 ３８例ＬＭＳ中９例发生异常甲基化,异常甲基化率为２３.7%（９／３８）。其中,７例p16蛋白表达阴性,２例p16蛋白弱阳性,在p16蛋白表达阴性的ＬＭＳ中,异常甲基化率为５０％（７／１４）。结论 p16基因第一外显子启动子区５‘CpG岛的异常甲基化是导致p16基因失活、蛋白缺如的重要基因外机制,并可能参与肿瘤的发生。     

乳腺癌中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤基因甲基化状况及其表达

目的 研究乳腺癌及癌旁增生组织中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)基因启动子区域的甲基化状况,并探讨基因异常甲基化与蛋白表达及其临床意义.方法 采用甲基化特异性PCR方法 对46例乳腺癌、22例癌旁增生组织及7例正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a和RB基因启动子区域甲基化状况进行检测,并采用免疫组织化学SP法对p16INK4a蛋白表达情况进行相应检测.结果 乳腺癌、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因的甲基化率分别为23.9%(11/46)、18.2%(4/22)、1/7;RB基因的甲基化率分别为10.8%(5/46)、9.1%(2/22)、0(0/7);肿瘤组织、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因、RB基因甲基化率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).正常乳腺组织、癌旁增生组织、乳腺癌中p16INK4a蛋白表达阳性率分别为7/7、60.8%(28/46)和81.8%(18/22),三者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a蛋白表达与肿瘤分级相关(P<0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a甲基化状况与其蛋白表达、肿瘤分级、ER表达阴性具有相关性(P<0.05),与肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、年龄均不相关;RB基因甲基化状态与肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、ER表达及年龄均无相关性,但与淋巴结转移相关(P<0.05).结论 p16INK4a基因异常甲基化可能在乳腺癌发生过程中作用有限,但在肿瘤的演进中发挥作用;RB基因甲基化检测对于分析乳腺癌进展及预后情况可能有一定参考价值;p16INK4a基因甲基化是p16INK4a蛋白失表达的机制之一.     

乳腺癌中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤基因甲基化状况及其表达

目的 研究乳腺癌及癌旁增生组织中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)基因启动子区域的甲基化状况,并探讨基因异常甲基化与蛋白表达及其临床意义.方法 采用甲基化特异性PCR方法 对46例乳腺癌、22例癌旁增生组织及7例正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a和RB基因启动子区域甲基化状况进行检测,并采用免疫组织化学SP法对p16INK4a蛋白表达情况进行相应检测.结果 乳腺癌、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因的甲基化率分别为23.9%(11/46)、18.2%(4/22)、1/7;RB基因的甲基化率分别为10.8%(5/46)、9.1%(2/22)、0(0/7);肿瘤组织、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因、RB基因甲基化率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).正常乳腺组织、癌旁增生组织、乳腺癌中p16INK4a蛋白表达阳性率分别为7/7、60.8%(28/46)和81.8%(18/22),三者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a蛋白表达与肿瘤分级相关(P<0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a甲基化状况与其蛋白表达、肿瘤分级、ER表达阴性具有相关性(P<0.05),与肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、年龄均不相关;RB基因甲基化状态与肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、ER表达及年龄均无相关性,但与淋巴结转移相关(P<0.05).结论 p16INK4a基因异常甲基化可能在乳腺癌发生过程中作用有限,但在肿瘤的演进中发挥作用;RB基因甲基化检测对于分析乳腺癌进展及预后情况可能有一定参考价值;p16INK4a基因甲基化是p16INK4a蛋白失表达的机制之一.     

乳腺癌中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤基因甲基化状况及其表达

目的 研究乳腺癌及癌旁增生组织中p16INK4a和视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)基因启动子区域的甲基化状况,并探讨基因异常甲基化与蛋白表达及其临床意义.方法 采用甲基化特异性PCR方法 对46例乳腺癌、22例癌旁增生组织及7例正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a和RB基因启动子区域甲基化状况进行检测,并采用免疫组织化学SP法对p16INK4a蛋白表达情况进行相应检测.结果 乳腺癌、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因的甲基化率分别为23.9%(11/46)、18.2%(4/22)、1/7;RB基因的甲基化率分别为10.8%(5/46)、9.1%(2/22)、0(0/7);肿瘤组织、癌旁增生组织和正常乳腺组织中p16INK4a基因、RB基因甲基化率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).正常乳腺组织、癌旁增生组织、乳腺癌中p16INK4a蛋白表达阳性率分别为7/7、60.8%(28/46)和81.8%(18/22),三者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a蛋白表达与肿瘤分级相关(P<0.05);肿瘤组织中p16INK4a甲基化状况与其蛋白表达、肿瘤分级、ER表达阴性具有相关性(P<0.05),与肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、年龄均不相关;RB基因甲基化状态与肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、ER表达及年龄均无相关性,但与淋巴结转移相关(P<0.05).结论 p16INK4a基因异常甲基化可能在乳腺癌发生过程中作用有限,但在肿瘤的演进中发挥作用;RB基因甲基化检测对于分析乳腺癌进展及预后情况可能有一定参考价值;p16INK4a基因甲基化是p16INK4a蛋白失表达的机制之一.     

原发胃癌中p16和p15基因表达及甲基化异常

为检测胃癌组织中抑癌基因p16,p15及其启动子区甲基化状态和P16、P15蛋白表达情况。选择p16、p15基因及启动子区域，用PCR－SSCP、MSP（甲基化特异的PCR）和测序法对100例胃癌患者的癌组织、癌旁正常组织和5例正常组织进行检测，同时用免疫组化法检测了癌组织和正常对照组织的P16和P15的表达。结果发现癌组织p16和p15基因启动子区甲基化率显著高于癌旁正常组织和正常对照；胃癌组织中，71％的病例P16表达阴性，54％的病例具有p16基因启动子区的高甲基化，无突变和纯合缺失检出；11％的病例P15表达阴性，9％的病例具有p15基因启动子区的高甲基化，p15异常与低分化胃癌有关，p15基因内含子1和外显子1内各发现1例DNA序列改变；癌组织中p16和p15基因启动子区甲基化与其蛋白表达密切相关。结果显示p16基因启动子区域高甲基化是胃癌中p16基因失活的关键因素之一，并在胃癌的发生发展中发挥重要作用；p15基因启动子区域高甲基化在胃癌中起一定作用。     

宫颈癌脆性组氨酸三联基因的表达与血浆中的甲基化状态

目的探讨宫颈癌患者血浆中脆性组氨酸三联（fragile histidine triad, FHIT） 基因5′端CpG岛甲基化状态以及该基因在宫颈癌组织中的表达情况。方法用甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应（methylafion specific polymerase chain reaction, MS-PCR）对151例患者的血浆进行FHIT基因甲基化状态的研究，并用免疫组织化学方法检测FHIT蛋白的表达情况。结果31．13％的患者血浆FHIT基因发生甲基化；59．60％宫颈癌组织FHIT蛋白表达减弱或缺失，其中47．78％存在血浆FHIT基因的甲基化。结论血浆中FHIT基因甲基化是引起宫颈癌FHIT蛋白表达减弱的重要因素，利用它可以对宫颈癌进行无创伤诊断和预后的评估。     

骨巨细胞瘤TIMP-3启动子甲基化的研究

目的 检测骨巨细胞瘤(GCT)中TIMP—3启动子甲基化及其蛋白表达，探讨该肿瘤组织TIMP—3蛋白表达缺失的原因和TIMP-3启动子甲基化与GCT分级和复发的关系。方法 用免疫组织化学SP法和蛋白免疫印迹检测TIMP—3在GCT组织中的表达，用甲基化特异的PCR(MSP)法检测TIMP—3基因启动子的甲基化状态。结果 TIMP—3主要在单核基质细胞和多核巨细胞的胞质表达，后者的表达具有明显的极向性。17例GCT中有5例(29．4％)TIMP—3蛋白丢失，其中4例的TIMP—3启动子发生异常甲基化，且均为组织学分级为Ⅱ级的病例。结论 GCT的局部骨质破坏，可能与TIMP—3丢失有关；而TIMP—3启动子的异常甲基化，是TIMP—3基因失活和蛋白丢失的重要机制。     

乳腺癌发展过程中的bcl-2甲基化及其与蛋白表达的关系

目的建立bcl-2基因甲基化特异的PCR（MSP）检测方法,检测乳腺癌发展过程中的bcl-2甲基化．并探讨bcl-2甲基化与蛋白表达的关系。方法设计bcl-2基因MSP引物,采用MSP方法检测30例正常、25例不典型增生（癌前病变）、40例腋窝淋巴结阴性（癌症初期）和45例腋窝淋巴结阳性（癌症后期）乳腺组织的bcl-2基因5’端启动子CpG岛甲基化状态。另外采用免疫组织化学S-P法检测bcl-2的蛋白表达。结果正常、不典型增生、淋巴结阴性和淋巴结阳性乳腺组织的bcl-2甲基化率分别为10．0％、32．0％、40．0％和53．3％。乳腺癌发展过程中的bcl-2甲基化率渐增（P〈0．01）,bcl-2蛋白表达率渐减（P〈0．01）。不典型增生较正常乳腺组织的bcl-2甲基化水平显著提高（P〈0．05）。在乳腺癌发展过程中的4个阶段,bcl-2甲基化与蛋白表达两者之间均呈显著负相关性（P〈0．01）。结论该研究建立了bcl-2基因MSP检测方法,bcl-2基因MSP引物的设计是合理的。bcl-2启动子甲基化可能成为乳腺癌前病变的分子指标之一。在乳腺癌发展过程中,bcl-25’端调控区CpG岛甲基化可能是下调bcl-2表达的因素。     

Methylation status of TP73 in meningiomas

Deletions at 1p are frequent in meningioma and represent a genetic marker associated with the genesis of atypical WHO grade II forms. Previous mutational analysis of TP73, a structurally and functionally TP53 homologous gene located at 1p36.33, failed to demonstrate a significant rate of sequence variations linked to gene inactivation in meningiomas with 1p loss. As an alternative, TP73 may be inactivated through aberrant 5' CpG island methylation, a primary mechanism participating in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes during tumorigenesis. We determined the methylation status of the TP73 gene in a series of 60 meningiomas (33 grade I, 24 grade II, and 3 grade III samples), including tumors with deletion at 1p (n=30) and with intact 1p (n=30). Aberrant methylation was detected in 10 cases (33%) with 1p deletion and in 3 tumors (10%) with retention of alleles at this chromosome arm. The distribution of the 13 cases of methylation according to malignancy grade was 7 grade I, 5 grade II, and 1 grade III tumor. Accordingly, although TP73 aberrant methylation was more frequent in meningiomas with 1p deletion (P<0.05), no association with the grade of malignancy could be established. These findings, together with the previously reported increased TP73 expression in malignant meningiomas suggest that opposing functions of this gene may characterize distinct subsets of tumors: suppressed or reduced expression as a result of CpG methylation in some grade I-grade II tumors, and enhanced expression in some more malignant forms.     

Epigenetic alteration of p16INK4a gene in dedifferentiation of liposarcoma

The atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is a locally aggressive subtype of liposarcoma unless dedifferentiation occurs. The mechanism driving this progression is not clear. Loss of p16 is believed to be an early and critical event in tumor progression. Gene silencing by methylation of p16INK4a gene promoter has been reported in several soft tissue sarcomas. The aim of this study is to study the role of p16INK4a gene promoter methylation and p16 expression in tumor progression (dedifferentiation) and recurrence of ALT/WDLPS. Four cases of dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) and three cases of recurrent well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) were collected, and methylation status of p16INK4a gene promoter was analyzed using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) on DNA extracted from paraffin blocks. p16 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry on the same blocks. Methylation of p16INK4a gene promoter was seen in the dedifferentiated (DD) components only, in two out of four (2/4, 50%) DDLPS. The other two DDLPS and three recurrent WDLPS were not methylated. Both WD and DD components in all four DDLPS cases showed strong nuclear p16 expression. All three recurrent WDLPS showed positive p16 expression with similar intensity between primary and recurrent tumors. Even though linear correlation between p16 promoter hypermethylation and p16 protein expression was not present, there appears to be a role for p16INK4a gene promoter hypermethylation in DDLPS and not in recurrent WDLPS.     

Promoter methylation status of multiple genes in brain metastases of solid tumors

The aberrant methylation of the CpG island promoter regions acquired by tumor cells is one mechanism for loss of gene function. The high methylation rate for RB1 and death-associated protein-kinase gene (DAP-kinase) (60 and 90%, respectively) previously found in brain metastases suggests this mechanism could be non-randomly associated to tumor progression and metastasis. Thus, in addition to these two genes, we determined the methylation status of the genes p16INK4a, glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), p14ARF, TP53, p73, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP-3), in 18 brain metastases of solid tumors, with methylation specific PCR. The metastases were derived from malignant melanoma (three cases), lung carcinoma (six cases), breast carcinoma (three cases), ovarian carcinoma (two cases) and one each from colon, kidney, bladder and undifferentiated carcinoma. We detected methylation levels in the tumor samples of 83% in p16INK4a, 72% in DAP-kinase, 56% in THBS1, 50% in RB1, 39% in MGMT, 33% in GSTP1 and p14ARF each, 22% in p73 and TIMP-3 each, and 11% in TP53. The methylation index (number of genes methylated/number of genes tested) varied between 0.1 and 0.6, with an average of 0.42, indicating that a high grade of gene methylation accumulates parallel to the tumor metastasis process. Our data suggest an important role for gene methylation in the development of brain metastases, primarily involving epigenetic silencing of DAP-kinase, THBS1 and the cell-cycle regulators RB1/p16INK4a.     

p16(INK4a) promoter methylation and 9p21 allelic loss in colorectal carcinomas: relation with immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) expression and with tumor budding

In colorectal carcinomas, p16(INK4a) inactivation is known to occur by allelic loss and by promoter methylation, but mutations are rare. p16(INK4a) is up-regulated in tumor buds, and the consequent shutdown of proliferation may be a prerequisite for tumor budding. Fifty-seven colorectal carcinomas from a consecutive series were investigated. Using DNA from tissue homogenates, p16(INK4a) promoter methylation was seen in 17 of 57 tumors by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, and this could be confirmed using DNA from laser-capture microdissected material in 16 of these cases. A total loss of immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) expression was seen in 6 of 17 tumors with promoter methylation. Quantification of immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) expression for the remaining 11 cases revealed statistically lower frequencies of expression as compared with cases without p16(INK4a) promoter methylation. 9p21 allelic loss was observed in 9 cases, but p16(INK4a) expression in these carcinomas was not reduced. Attempted linear regression of p16(INK4a) expression in tumor buds on the degree of tumor budding, as counted on pan-cytokeratin immunostains, did not show a correlation. p16(INK4a) promoter methylation can completely abrogate p16(INK4a) expression in colorectal carcinomas. In many cases, however, it has an appreciable but only modulatory influence on p16(INK4a) expression. Possibly, methylations are heterozygous, and/or mosaic in colorectal carcinomas and/or methylations are not totally stable but can be lost between carcinoma cell replication cycles. Up-regulation of p16(INK4a) does not seem to be a strict requirement for tumor budding, hence, the absence of a correlation.     

Methylation of p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) are involved in the development and progression of gastric MALT lymphomas.

p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) are inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases and their inactivation by methylation has been reported as a major tumorigenic mechanism in tumors. To examine whether methylation of p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) is involved in the development and progression of gastric MALT lymphomas, 24 gastric low-grade lymphomas of MALT, 11 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, and 10 each case of gastric lymphoid follicles with and without Helicobacter pylori infection were studied. H. pylori infection was positive in 85.7% of the gastric lymphomas. In the gastric lymphoid follicles positive for H. pylori, methylation of p16(INK4A) was detected in 10% of cases, while methylation of p57(KIP2) was not detected. In low-grade MALT lymphomas, p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) were methylated in 41.7 and 29.2% of the cases, respectively. In diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, methylation of p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) was found in 72.7 and 36.4% of the cases, respectively. All but one case with p16(INK4A) and p57(KIP2) methylation was H. pylori positive and most of them were stage I. Our results indicate that methylation of p16(INK4A) followed by p57(KIP2) methylation involves during the tumorigenesis of gastric MALT lymphomas associated with H. pylori infection. As methylation of these two genes was more frequent in the higher grade (P<0.05), it may contribute to the malignant progression of gastric MALT lymphomas.     

Alterations in the RB1 pathway in low-grade diffuse gliomas lacking common genetic alterations

We recently reported that the vast majority (>90%) of low‐grade diffuse gliomas (diffuse astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma and oligodendroglioma) carry at least one of the following genetic alterations: IDH1/2 mutation, TP53 mutation or 1p/19q loss. Only 7% of cases were triple‐negative (ie, lacking any of these alterations). In the present study, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in 15 triple‐negative WHO grade II gliomas (eight diffuse astrocytomas and seven oligodendrogliomas) showed loss at 9p21 (p14^ARF, p15^INK4b, p16^INK4a loci) and 13q14–13q32 (containing the RB1 locus) in three and two cases, respectively. Further analyses in 31 triple‐negative cases as well as a total of 160 non‐triple‐negative cases revealed that alterations in the RB1 pathway (homozygous deletion and promoter methylation of the p15^INK4b, p16^INK4a and RB1 genes) were significantly more frequent in triple‐negative (26%) than in non‐triple‐negative cases (11%; P = 0.0371). Multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, histology and treatment showed that RB1 pathway alterations were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome for patients with low‐grade diffuse glioma [hazard ratio, 3.024 (1.279–6.631); P = 0.0057]. These results suggest that a fraction of low‐grade diffuse gliomas lacking common genetic alterations may develop through a distinct genetic pathway, which may include loss of cell‐cycle control regulated by the RB1 pathway.     

p14ARF deletion and methylation in genetic pathways to glioblastomas

The CDKN2A locus on chromosome 9p21 contains the p14ARF and p16INK4a genes, and is frequently deleted in human neoplasms, including brain tumors. In this study, we screened 34 primary (de novo) glioblastomas and 16 secondary glioblastomas that had progressed from low-grade diffuse astrocytomas for alterations of the p14ARF and p16INK4a genes, including homozygous deletion by differential PCR, promoter hypermethylation by methylation-specific PCR, and protein expression by immunohistochemistry. A total of 29 glioblastomas (58%) had a p14ARF homozygous deletion or methylation, and 17 (34%) showed p16INK4a homozygous deletion or methylation. Thirteen glioblastomas showed both p14ARF and p16INK4a homozygous deletion, while nine showed only a p14ARF deletion. Immunohistochemistry revealed loss of p14ARF expression in the majority of glioblastomas (38/50, 76%), and this correlated with the gene status, i.e. homozygous deletion or promoter hypermethylation. There was no significant difference in the overall frequency of p14ARF and p16INK4a alterations between primary and secondary glioblastomas. The analysis of multiple biopsies from the same patients revealed hypermethylation of p14ARF (5/15 cases) and p16INK4a (1/15 cases) already at the stage of low-grade diffuse astrocytoma but consistent absence of homozygous deletions. These results suggest that aberrant p14ARF expression due to homozygous deletion or promoter hypermethylation is associated with the evolution of both primary and secondary glioblastomas, and that p14ARF promoter methylation is an early event in subset of astrocytomas that undergo malignant progression to secondary glioblastoma.