Transitioning from methadone to buprenorphine maintenance in management of opioid use disorder during pregnancy

Background: Opioid use disorder during pregnancy is a growing health concern. Methadone maintenance is the treatment of choice but emerging data indicate buprenorphine is a viable alternative. Due to costs and limited accessibility of methadone, pregnant women may require transition from methadone to buprenorphine for maintenance treatment. Objectives: To assess safety and effectiveness of transitioning from methadone to buprenorphine when necessary during pregnancy. Methods: A standardized protocol using low buprenorphine doses to minimize emergent withdrawal symptoms under careful obstetric and psychiatric monitoring was implemented in 20 pregnant women. Outpatient maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed. Results: Women maintained on an average methadone dose of 44 ± 4.77 (20–100) mg/day (mean±standard error mean (SEM); range) were successfully transitioned to 12.60 ± 0.8 (8–16) mg/day (mean±SEM; range) of buprenorphine. Within 4 weeks of transition, 15% had illicit drugs detected in urine drug screens. Ninety percent of women maintained outpatient follow-up until delivery. At delivery, 38.9% of mothers were exclusively adherent to buprenorphine (without use of illicit substances and/or other psychotropic medications); this resulted in significantly lower rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and shorter hospital stays. Discussion: Pregnant women transitioned from methadone to buprenorphine maintenance showed maternal and neonatal outcomes comparable to studies of women on buprenorphine throughout pregnancy. Infants born to buprenorphine-maintained women who abstained from illicit substances and other prescribed psychotropic medications experienced less severe NAS and shorter hospitalizations compared with women with illicit substance use and other psychotropic medications. These findings suggest women can safely be transitioned from methadone to buprenorphine during pregnancy.     

Medication-assisted treatment for youth with opioid use disorder: Current dilemmas and remaining questions

The prevalence of risky opioid use, opioid use disorder, and related harms continue to rise among youth (adolescents and young adults age 15–25) in North America. With an increasing number of opioid overdoses, there remain significant barriers to care for youth with opioid use disorder, and there is an urgent need to expand evidence-based care for treatment of opioid use disorder among this population. Based on the extensive literature on treatment of opioid use disorder among adults, medicated-assisted treatment is likely to be an important or even essential component of treatment of opioid use disorder for most youth. In this article, we outline the current dilemmas and questions regarding the use of medication-assisted treatment among youth with opioid use disorder and propose some potential solutions based on the current evidence.     

A systematic review of rural-specific barriers to medication treatment for opioid use disorder in the United States

ABSTRACT

Background

Opioid-related deaths have risen dramatically in rural communities. Prior studies highlight few medication treatment providers for opioid use disorder in rural communities, though literature has yet to examine rural-specific treatment barriers.     

Extended‐release injectable naltrexone for opioid use disorder: a systematic review

Aims

To review systematically the published literature on extended‐release naltrexone (XR‐NTX, Vivitrol^®), marketed as a once‐per‐month injection product to treat opioid use disorder. We addressed the following questions: (1) how successful is induction on XR‐NTX; (2) what are adherence rates to XR‐NTX; and (3) does XR‐NTX decrease opioid use? Factors associated with these outcomes as well as overdose rates were examined.

Methods

We searched PubMed and used Google Scholar for forward citation searches of peer‐reviewed papers from January 2006 to June 2017. Studies that included individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder who were offered XR‐NTX were included.

Results

We identified and included 34 studies. Pooled estimates showed that XR‐NTX induction success was lower in studies that included individuals that required opioid detoxification [62.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.5–70.0%] compared with studies that included individuals already detoxified from opioids (85.0%, 95% CI = 78.0–90.1%); 44.2% (95% CI = 33.1–55.9%) of individuals took all scheduled injections of XR‐NTX, which were usually six or fewer. Adherence was higher in prospective investigational studies (i.e. studies conducted in a research context according to a study protocol) compared to retrospective studies of medical records taken from routine care (6‐month rates: 46.7%, 95% CI = 34.5–59.2% versus 10.5%, 95% CI = 4.6–22.4%, respectively). Compared with referral to treatment, XR‐NTX reduced opioid use in adults under criminal justice supervision and when administered to inmates before release. XR‐NTX reduced opioid use compared with placebo in Russian adults, but this effect was confounded by differential retention between study groups. XR‐NTX showed similar efficacy to buprenorphine when randomization occurred after detoxification, but was inferior to buprenorphine when randomization occurred prior to detoxification.

Conclusions

Many individuals intending to start extended‐release naltrexone (XR‐NTX) do not and most who do start XR‐NTX discontinue treatment prematurely, two factors that limit its clinical utility significantly. XR‐NTX appears to decrease opioid use but there are few experimental demonstrations of this effect.     

Psycho-physiological response to pain among individuals with comorbid pain and opioid use disorder: Implications for patients with prolonged abstinence

Background: Individuals with comorbid opioid addiction and pain (COAP) relapse 3–5 times more often than patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) but without pain. However, psychophysiological responses to pain among a COAP population are unknown.

Objectives: We hypothesized that those on Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) with chronic pain, relative to opioid-naïve chronic pain individuals, would show greater psycho-physiological pain reactivity and slower recovery when exposed to acute pain.

Methods: Four groups with chronic pain were recruited (N = 120; 60% Female): 1) MOUD-methadone; 2) MOUD-buprenorphine; 3) history of completed MOUD with prolonged opioid abstinence (PA; M_abstinence = 121 weeks; SD = 23.3); and 4) opioid-naïve. We assessed heart rate (HR), galvanic skin conductance (GSC), peripheral temperature, and frontalis electromyography (EMG) during a cold pain task.

Results: MOUD subjects had delayed HR reactivity to pain compared to those not on MOUD (PA & opioid-naïve; F(3,119) = 2.87, p < .04). The PA group showed a normal HR reactivity pattern, but had higher HR compared to the opioid-naïve group. The GSC group x time analysis showed the PA group had greater baseline levels and pain reactivity than the other groups (F(3,119) = 3.84, p < .02). The opioid-naïve group had lower reactivity on peripheral temperature compared to other groups (F(3,119) = 9.69, p < .001).

Conclusion: Greater psychophysiological reactivity to pain was experienced by co-morbid OUD/chronic pain subjects who had been opioid abstinent for an extended period, possibly due to the lack of a buffering effect of opioid agonists. These subjects may develop coping skills to tolerate pain distress, thereby avoiding relapse in response to pain triggers. Understanding how pain creates more intense psychophysiological responses among COAP patients may lead to better treatments.     

A week-long outpatient induction onto XR-naltrexone in patients with opioid use disorder

ABSTRACT

Background

Extended-release (XR) naltrexone can prevent relapse to opioid use disorder following detoxification. However, one of the barriers to initiating XR-naltrexone is the recommendation for a 7–10-day period of abstinence from opioids prior to the first dose.     

Exercise as an adjunctive treatment for cannabis use disorder

Background: Despite cannabis being the most widely used illicit substance in the United States, individuals diagnosed with cannabis use disorder (CUD) have few well-researched, affordable treatment options available to them. Although found to be effective for improving treatment outcomes in other drug populations, exercise is an affordable and highly accessible treatment approach that has not been routinely investigated in cannabis users. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to inform the topic regarding exercise’s potential as an adjunctive treatment for individuals with CUD. Methods: We reviewed the evidence surrounding cannabis use and its current treatment in the United States, explored the rationale for including exercise in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs), and in particular, proposed a biological mechanism (i.e., endocannabinoids (eCBs)) that should be examined when utilizing exercise for the treatment of CUD. Results: Cannabis use is widespread and increasing in the United States. Chronic, heavy cannabis use may dysregulate the endogenous cannabinoid system, which has implications for several psychobiological processes that interact with the eCB system such as reward processing and the stress response. Given that exercise is a potent activator of the eCB system, it is mechanistically plausible that exercise could be an optimal method to supplement cessation efforts by reducing psychophysical withdrawal, managing stress, and attenuating drug cravings. Conclusion: We suggest there is a strong behavioral and physiological rationale to design studies which specifically assess the efficacy of exercise, in combination with other therapies, in treating CUD. Moreover, it will be especially important to include the investigation of psychobiological mechanisms (e.g., eCBs, hippocampal volume), which have been associated with both exercise and SUDs, to examine the broader impact of exercise on behavioral and physiological responses to treatment.