不可切除Ⅲ A(N2)期非小细胞肺癌的术前化疗

目的探讨不能切除的ⅢA（N2）期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的治疗方法。方法1999年1月至2002年12月,76例不可切除ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC患者接受诺维苯（NVB,25mg／m^23,第1,5天）加卡铂（300mg／m^2,第1天）2个周期的化疗,第二周期化疗后3周重新评估能否手术切除。对化疗效果达到部分有效（PR）或完全有效（CR）、估计能完全切除的64例患者行剖胸探查术;对化疗后评价为稳定（SD）和进展（PD）的12例患者行放疗。64例手术患者中,完全切除（肺叶或全肺切除加纵隔淋巴结清扫术,至少达到R3水平）56例,术后继续给予诺维苯加卡铂化疗2个周期;不完全切除8例,另加局部放疗。结果76例不可切除的ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC经诱导化疗后手术或放疗,中位生存期为18．6个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为64．2％、39．4％和25．6％。其中完全切除患者的中位生存期为28．2个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为70．4％、52．5％和38．6％。结论对不可切除的局部晚期NSCLC,如诱导化疗后可以手术,应首选外科治疗。     

术后放疗在接受新辅助化疗联合手术切除的非小细胞肺癌的应用进展

新辅助化疗联合手术切除是非小细胞肺癌的标准治疗模式之一,但其疗后局部区域复发率较高。术后放疗(PORT)能显著降低该模式治疗后的局部区域复发率,但对改善生存的价值尚未完全明确:一部分研究认为其不能改善Ⅱ-ⅢA(N2)期患者的生存,另一部分研究则认为其可使高危患者的生存获益。目前此类患者PORT的指征包括R1、R2切除及ypN2期。PORT技术首选三维适形与调强放疗;R0切除患者放疗剂量50~54 Gy可兼顾疗效与安全;靶区范围目前尚无定论,但研究多倾向于只进行受累淋巴结区域照射。大部分研究中PORT的不良反应在可接受范围之内。但目前相关研究的证据等级较低,尚需前瞻性研究来证实上述结论。     

Equivalent outcome of patients with clinical Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation compared with induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery (C/S) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for clinical Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1990 and 2000, 107 patients underwent either induction C/S (n = 55) or concurrent CRT (n = 52) for clinical Stage IIIA NSCLC at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced in the two treatment groups with respect to T and N stage, race, median age, performance status, weight loss, and histologic findings. In the C/S group, induction chemotherapy included two to four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. Postoperative RT was delivered in 35 patients, with referral for RT made at the discretion of the treating physician. CRT consisted of three cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy given every 3 weeks concurrent with RT to 60-63 Gy in 30-35 fractions in 27 patients and 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions (b.i.d.) in 25 patients. Local control, overall disease-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up duration was 20 months in all patients and 32 months in surviving patients. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the end points measured in the two treatment groups. Specifically, the median survival time was 31 and 27 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 33% and 30% in the C/S and CRT groups, respectively. Likewise, the 5-year local control (58% vs. 61%), disease-free (24% vs. 23%), and distant metastasis-free (44% vs. 36%) survival rates in the two groups were not significantly different. In the C/S group, postoperative RT significantly improved the 5-year local control rate from 33.8% to 81.5% (p = 0.007) but did not significantly improve overall survival. Additionally, patients in the C/S group whose disease responded to induction chemotherapy had a significantly improved 5-year overall survival rate (50%) compared with those who had stable or progressive disease (16%, p = 0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of Stage IIIA NSCLC using either induction C/S or CRT resulted in similar outcomes in terms of local control and median overall, 5-year overall, distant metastasis-free, and disease-free survival. However, patients undergoing induction C/S often needed postoperative RT to achieve local control equivalent to that achieved with concurrent CRT. Advances in radiation-based treatment as reflected in this study have resulted in similar outcomes compared with modern induction C/S. To improve survival, however, newer systemic agents that reduce and control distant metastasis are required.     

Radiotherapy versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in surgically treated IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Phase II trials utilizing preoperative chemotherapy in selected patients have achieved complete resection rates of 50%-70% with 3-5 year failure-free survival rates of 15%-33%. Between October 1992 and November 1994, 57 adults (50 of whom were evaluable) with surgically staged IIIA NSCLC and pathologically documented ipsilateral mediastinal nodal involvement (N2) were enrolled in a Cancer and Leukemia Group B randomized trial. Preoperative therapy was thought to be critical to facilitating surgical resectability. For patients randomized to the radiotherapy/surgery/radiotherapy (RSR) arm (n = 24), treatment consisted of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) at 40 Gy, surgery, and then additional RT at 14-20 Gy. For patients randomized to the chemotherapy/surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CSCR) arm (n = 26), treatment consisted of 2 cycles of cisplatin/etoposide with filgrastim support (PE) followed by surgery, 2 more cycles of PE, then RT 54-60 Gy. The total dose of RT on either arm was 54 Gy if completely resected or 60 Gy if incompletely resected or unresected. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Thoracotomy was performed in 42 patients (84%), 28 (67%) of whom had complete resection. The median failure-free and overall survival rates were 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-23 months) and 23 months (95% CI, 19 months-infinity) for the RSR arm and 11 months (95% CI, 5-20 months) and 18 months (95% CI, 12-32 months) for the CSCR arm. The rates of overall and complete surgical resection, downstaging of nodal involvement, and failure-free (P = 0.92) and overall survival (P = 0.41) did not differ between the two treatment arms. Moreover, in this trial, the chemotherapy regimen was sufficiently toxic to have had a lower completion rate of prescribed therapy in the CSCR arm than in the RSR arm.     

Predictors of acute esophagitis in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate possible clinical and dosimetric predictors of acute esophagitis in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated in a prospective Phase I-II trimodality protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 36 patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated in a Phase I-II high-dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocol were analyzed for possible predictors of acute esophagitis. The median age was 58 years (range, 38-77 years). Patients included in this study had either Stage IIIA (n = 24) or IIIB (n = 12) disease. All patients were treated with induction concurrent carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve 1), vinorelbine (5-15 mg/m(2)), and hyperfractionated radiotherapy (69.6 Gy) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve 6, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)) or surgery (n = 19) plus consolidation chemotherapy. Acute toxicities were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The following clinical and dosimetric parameters were analyzed: age, gender, race, T stage, N stage, pretreatment body mass index, percentage of weight lost during therapy, pretherapy serum albumin, tumor location, length of esophagus in treatment field, percentage of esophagus volume treated to >40, >45, >50, >55, >60, and >65 Gy. These parameters were coded and analyzed against Grade 2 and worse esophagitis using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, Grade 1, 2, and 3 acute esophagitis was observed in 16 (44%), 12 (33%), and 2 (5.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 4 or 5 toxicity was not observed in this patient cohort. Only the pretreatment body mass index (rho = -0.431, p = 0.004) and percentage of esophagus volume treated to >50 Gy (rho = 0.297, p = 0.040) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the incidence of Grade 2 or worse esophagitis on univariate analysis. These parameters retained their statistical significance on multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.029 and 0.049, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing concurrent high-dose chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy, a low pretherapy body mass index and percentage of esophagus volume treated to >50 Gy were significantly associated with acute Grade 2 or worse esophagitis.     

Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery for patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesThe optimal neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial, as data support both preoperative chemoradiotherapy (N-CRT) and chemotherapy (N-CTX). We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of N-CRT versus N-CTX in stage IIIA patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).MethodsPatients in the NCDB with stage IIIA NSCLC treated with N-CRT or N-CTX and surgery between 2003 and 2005 were analyzed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), residual nodal disease (RND), any adverse pathologic features (APF = RND or positive margins), and 30-day postoperative mortality (POPM). The survival impact of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) after N-CTX was also investigated.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 1076 patients: 700 (65%) underwent N-CRT. The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 39% (39.2% N-CRT vs. 38.6% N-CTX, p = NS). On multivariable regression, there was no difference in OS between N-CRT versus N-CTX (p = 0.70). However, N-CRT was associated with a lower independent risk of RND (odds ratio, OR, 0.75, p = 0.02) and a lower risk of APF (OR 0.67, p = 0.0023). Among N-CTX patients, PORT was associated with inferior survival in patients without APF (hazard ratio 1.68, p = 0.01) but not with APF. N-CRT did not increase early POPM, readmission rates, or length of stay.ConclusionThere was no difference in overall survival between these two strategies, although N-CRT was associated with improved pathologic outcomes. These data support either treatment approach, but early surgical consultation is critical to ensure operability. The indications for PORT in patients without adverse pathologic factors require further investigation.     

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for patients with non-operable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer is considered as standard therapy. As concomitant CT appears to be beneficial, the choice of anticancer agents and the role of induction chemotherapy is still unresolved. We present our experience based on an induction CT scheme with carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by RT and concomitant CT. 31 patients with non-operable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC without pleural effusion were included in this study: 30 males, 1 female; median age 66 years (range: 50-81); 32% with non-operable stage IIIA and 68% with stage IIIB without pleural effusion; 61% squamous cell carcinoma, 32% adenocarcinoma and 7% other histologies. Regarding performance status (PS), 9.7% PS 0 and 90% PS 1 were included. Patients received 3 courses of induction CT with carboplatin AUC=6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), administrated i.v. on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, followed by thoracic irradiation (total dose 60-65 Gy, daily fractions 1.8-2 Gy) with two concurrent courses of carboplatin/paclitaxel. 16.2% of the patients achieved complete response, 48.4% partial response, 25.8% stable disease and 9.6% progression of disease. Median progression-free and overall survival was 12 and 18 months, respectively. The most frequent haematological toxicities were grade (G) 3 anaemia in 19.3%, G3 neutropenia in 9.6% and G4 neutropenia in 12.9%. Esophageal G2 toxicity (RTOG) was observed in 28.1% of cases. The induction CT followed by concomitant chemoradiation used in this study appears feasible, safe and effective when administered to an unselected inoperable NSCLC stage III patient cohort in the everyday routine clinical practice. Further, our results are comparable to previously published phase III studies.     

Dose-response relationship in locoregional control for patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between radiation dose and locoregional control (LRC) for patients with Stage II-III unresectable esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 69 consecutive patients with clinical Stage II or III esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1990 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 69 patients, 43 had received < or =51 Gy (lower dose group) and 26 >51 Gy (higher dose group). The median dose in the lower and higher dose groups was 30 Gy (range, 30-51 Gy) and 59.4 Gy (range, 54-64.8 Gy), respectively. Two fractionation schedules were used: rapid fractionation, delivering 30 Gy at 3 Gy/fraction within 2 weeks, and standard fractionation, delivering > or =45 Gy at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction daily. Total doses of <50 Gy were usually given with rapid fractionation. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were administrated to 93% of the patients. RESULTS: The patient characteristic that differed between the two groups was that patients in the lower dose group were more likely to have had weight loss >5% (46.2% vs. 23.3%). The lower dose group had more N1 tumors, but the tumor classification and stage grouping were similar in the two groups. The median follow-up time for all patients was 22 months (range, 2-56 months). Patients in the higher dose group had a statistically significant better 3-year local control rate (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.011), disease-free survival rate (25% vs. 10%, p = 0.004), and overall survival rate (13% vs. 3%, p = 0.054). A trend toward a better distant-metastasis-free survival rate was noted in the higher dose group (72% vs. 59%, p = 0.12). The complete clinical response rate was significantly greater in the higher dose group (46% vs. 23%, p = 0.048). In both groups, the most common type of first failure was persistence of the primary tumor. Significantly fewer patients in the higher dose group had tumor persistence after treatment (p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the pattern of locoregional or distant failure. The long-term side effects of chemoradiotherapy were similar in the two groups, although it was difficult to assess the side effects accurately in a retrospective fashion. On multivariate analysis, Stage II (vs. III) disease and radiation dose >51 Gy were independent predictors of improved LRC, and locoregional failure was an independent predictor of worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested a positive correlation between radiation dose and LRC in the population studied. A higher radiation dose was associated with increased LRC and survival in the dose range studied. The data also suggested that better LRC was associated with a lower rate of distant metastasis. A threshold of tumor response to radiation dose might be present, as suggested by the flattened slope in the high-dose area on the dose-response curve. A carefully designed dose-escalation study is required to confirm this assumption.     

Twice daily irradiation increases locoregional control in patients with medically inoperable or surgically unresectable stage II-IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of q.d. or b.i.d. radiotherapy (RT) on the outcome of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 261 patients with medically inoperable or surgically unresectable Stage II-IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer, who were treated with combined modality cisplatin-based chemotherapy and RT. Chemotherapy was administered either sequentially or concurrently with thoracic RT. The median follow-up was 18 months (range 2-92). Treatment groups included sequential chemotherapy and q.d. RT (n = 109), concurrent chemotherapy and q.d. RT (n = 48), and concurrent chemotherapy and b.i.d. RT (n = 104). Of the 261 patients, 97% had a Karnofsky performance score > or =80, and 86.2% had < or =5% weight loss in the 3 months before diagnosis; 66.7% had nonsquamous cell histologic features. All but 8 patients had Stage IIIA-B disease. RESULTS: The 2- and 5-year locoregional control rate was 42.4% and 25.7% for the q.d. group and 70.6% and 45.8% for the b.i.d. group, respectively (p = 0.0001). The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rate was 26.7% and 6.5% for the q.d. group and 39.6% and 27.3% for the b.i.d. group, respectively (p = 0.0114). The corresponding overall survival rates were 35.9% and 9.4% for the q.d. group and 38.7% and 26.1% for the b.i.d. group. No difference was found in the rate of distant metastasis between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that b.i.d. RT was a favorable prognostic factor for locoregional control and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: RT b.i.d. significantly improved locoregional control and disease-free survival compared with RT q.d. in patients with Stage IIIA-B non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Phase II trial of sequential chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation, surgery, and postoperative chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer remains a challenge. Although the benefit of combined chemoradiation has been established, the optimal chemotherapy regimen, timing of full-dose chemotherapy, and how best to combine chemotherapy with radiation to maximize systemic and radiosensitizing effects remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were included in a phase II trial of sequential carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation, surgery, and postoperative gemcitabine. Twenty-five patients (86%) completed the concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy phase and were eligible for surgery. At restaging, 7 patients (21%) showed disease progression. Seventeen patients (59%) went on to surgery. Few were able to tolerate full postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: The 1-year overall survival rate was 61%, with a 2-year survival rate of 56%. Median overall survival was 25.2 months. Seven of the patients are alive and without recurrence at the time of this writing. Our median follow-up time was 22.2 months. Reversible grade 3/4 toxicities were fairly common, experienced in 45% of patients. CONCLUSION: Our results with this combined modality approach are comparable with those of previous, similar studies. Postoperative chemotherapy after initial combined modality therapy is often not feasible, reinforcing the value of initial systemic therapy. Long-term results are still suboptimal and await studies adding targeted therapies to our usual chemotherapy/radiation approaches.     

Quality assurance of thoracic radiotherapy in EORTC 08941: a randomised trial of surgery versus thoracic radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after response to induction chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the improvement of quality of radiotherapy and compliance to the protocol amendment of EORTC study 08941. The radiotherapy-specific data were analysed from 154 patients with stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer who were actually irradiated after response to 3 cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy. The parameters of quality, assessed in 93 patients before and in 61 after protocol amendment, included: time interval between last chemotherapy course and start of thoracic radiotherapy, the use of a 3-D planning CT, dose and fractionation scheme to the primary tumour, the involved and uninvolved mediastinum, duration of radiotherapy and toxicity. A significant improvement of all quality parameters was noted, except for the overall treatment time, which decreased slightly. Protocol amendment resulted in an improvement of the quality and the compliance of most observed parameters, at the cost of some increase in overall treatment time. The latter reflects logistical problems rather than poor compliance.     

Surgical treatment of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

Data on five-year survival were evaluated for 258 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIA) (N2). In 155 patients (60%), N2 tumor was detected during surgery. Total resection was carried out in 179 (69.4%), subtotal--79 (30.6%). Total lymph node dissection was not employed in the latter group. Lateral thoracotomy was used in 213 cases. Transsternal procedure was performed in 45 cases of bulky tumor and extensive invasion of mediastinal fat. A comparison of five-year survival data failed to establish any relationship between survival and postoperative radiochemotherapy in radically-operated patients. It was found that surgery for non-small lung N2 tumors with mediastinal involvement is indicated and may be effective if total lymph node dissection is performed.     

Failure of T stage to predict survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated by radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Because T stage does not consistently reflect tumor size in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we hypothesized that T stage may be of limited prognostic value in patients with locoregional NSCLC treated by nonsurgical means. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of 243 patients with histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC treated in three consecutive prospective trials between 1989 and 1998. The eligibility criteria for this analysis included planned for and began treatment at 60 Gy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1; weight loss < or = 10%; no prior treatment; and no supraclavicular nodes, pleural effusion, or distant metastases. In the first study, 204 patients were randomized to receive conventional or accelerated radiotherapy (RT) with or without concomitant carboplatin. In the second, 15 patients were treated with concomitant cisplatin, etoposide, and RT in a single-arm study. In the third, 24 patients were treated with concomitant carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and RT in a dose-escalation study. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients for whom the T and N stage were known met the eligibility criteria. The patient characteristics were 77% male, 64% squamous histologic features, 33% ECOG status of 0, and 69% no weight loss. The nodal status was 36% N0, 7% N1, 52% N2, and 5% N3. The estimated median survival for all patients was 1.4 years (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6), with an estimated 10% surviving 5 years (95% confidence interval 7-15). No significant difference was found in survival among the three trials (p = 0.16). The estimated median survival time and 5-year survival rate according to T stage were as follows: T1 (n = 29), 1.6 years and 16%; T2 (n = 88), 1.3 years and 9%; T3 (n = 59), 1.4 years and 9%; and T4 (n = 55), 1.4 years and 9%. No significant trend was found in overall survival according to T stage (p = 0.85, log-rank). To test whether a significant effect of T stage on overall survival existed after adjusting for N stage, trial, ECOG status, and weight loss, a multifactor analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was carried out. There was still no significant effect of T stage on survival (p = 0.66) when all factors were taken into account. CONCLUSION: Although there is some evidence that T stage is an independent prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC treated surgically, it did not appear to be of value in this series of patients treated with RT with and without concomitant chemotherapy.     

Phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG 2597): induction chemotherapy followed by either standard thoracic radiotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable stage IIIA and B non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare once-daily radiation therapy (qdRT) with hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treatment naive, and had stage IIIA and B unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, and normal organ function. Induction chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of carboplatin area under time-concentration curve 6 mg/mL . min plus paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 on day 1. RT consisted of arm 1 (qdRT), 64 Gy (2 Gy/d), versus arm 2 (HART), 57.6 Gy (1.5 Gy tid for 2.5 weeks). A total of 388 patients were needed to detect a 50% increase in median survival from 14 months of qdRT to 21 months of HART; accrual was not achieved and the study closed prematurely. RESULTS: Of 141 patients enrolled, 83% were randomly assigned after chemotherapy to qdRT (n = 59) or HART (n = 60). Median survival was 20.3 and 14.9 months for HART and qdRT, respectively (P = .28). Overall response was 25% and 22% for HART and qdRT, respectively (P = .69). Two- and 3-year survival was 44% and 34% for HART, and 24% and 14% for qdRT, respectively. Grade > or = 3 toxicities included esophagitis in 14 v nine patients, and pneumonitis in 0 v 6 patients for HART and qdRT, respectively. Any subsequent trials of the HART regimen must address the issues that led to early closure, including slow accrual, logistics of HART, mucosal toxicity, and the fact that concurrent chemoradiotherapy now seems more effective than sequential treatment. CONCLUSION: After two cycles of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel, HART is feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. Although statistical significance was not achieved and the study closed early, there was a positive statistical trend suggesting a survival advantage with the HART regimen.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery in stage IIIA non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung: report of a Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, response rates, and survival for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgical resection in newly diagnosed patients with surgically staged IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with NSCLC underwent bronchoscopy, chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), bone scan, and surgical staging of the mediastinum. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of concurrent chemotherapy and RT. Patients then underwent surgical resection, which was followed in turn by additional chemotherapy and RT. Chemotherapy included cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3 and 29 and 31, and fluorouracil (5-FU) 30 mg/kg/d by infusion on days 1 to 3 and 29 to 31 (FVP). RT began on day 1 and included 3,000 cGy in 15 fractions. Surgery took place on day 55, and one more cycle of chemotherapy and an additional 3,000 cGy of RT began on day 85. RESULTS: Forty-one eligible patients (median follow-up, 53 months) were studied. N2 disease was present in 80%, whereas 20% had T3N0 or T3N1 lesions. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT included no complete responses (CR), 21 (51%) partial responses (PR) or regressions, 19 (46%) stable disease (SD), and one (2%) progressive disease (PD). Thirty-one patients underwent surgery, and 25 were resected. In four of the 25 resection specimens, no viable tumor was present, whereas in three of the six unresectable patients, extensive biopsy results demonstrated only necrotic tumor. The maximum response achieved using all protocol treatment was 27 (66%) CRs, seven (17%) PRs or regression, six (15%) SDs, and one (2%) PD. Toxicity was substantial and primarily hematologic. There were six (15%) treatment-related deaths, which included three perioperative deaths and three chemotherapy-related toxicity deaths. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a 1-year survival of 58% and a median survival of 15.5 months. Nine patients (22%) remain disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reasonably high rate of PR associated with concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT, and a high percentage of patients who ultimately were rendered completely disease-free. However, treatment-related morbidity and mortality was common. Median survival seemed to be only modestly improved beyond that achieved with less intensive means of treatment. However, a group has emerged of patients who enjoy prolonged disease-free survival and possible cure.     

High risk of brain metastases in surgically staged IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. We sought to review our experience with surgically staged IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on the patterns of failure in consecutively treated patients from 1988 to 2000. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 177 patients were reviewed. Collected data included stage, histology, use of chemotherapy and radiation, initial and subsequent sites of failure, and survival. One hundred twenty-four patients have died; follow-up time is 35 months among the remaining patients. RESULTS: The median survival from the time of surgery was 21.0 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 34%. Nodal downstaging to N0 disease correlated with OS and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). The most common site of recurrence was the brain. Thirty-four percent of patients recurred in the brain as their first site of failure, and 40% of patients developed brain metastases at some point in their course. In patients with nonsquamous histology and residual nodal involvement after neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of brain metastases was 53% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for N2-positive stage IIIA NSCLC enjoy an advantage in both OS and PFS if their lymph node status is downstaged to N(0). Because brain metastases constitute the most common site of failure in these patients, future studies focusing on prophylaxis of brain metastases may improve the outcome in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC.     

A phase III randomised study comparing two different dose-intensity regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation in patients with advanced locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of chemotherapy dose intensity in patients with initially unresectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with survival as primary end point, by testing two different regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had pathologically proven NSCLC, an initially unresectable non-metastatic tumour without homolateral malignant pleural effusion, no prior history of malignancy and had received no prior therapy. Treatment was randomised for chemotherapy between three courses of MIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 3 g/m2; cisplatin 50 mg/m2) or SuperMIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2; cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatine 200 mg/m2), followed by chest irradiation (60 Gy; five times per week, for 6 weeks). If the tumour became resectable after chemotherapy, surgery was performed, followed by mediastinal irradiation. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were eligible: 176 in the MIP arm and 175 in the SuperMIP arm, with 43% and 51% stages IIIA and IIIB, respectively. There was a significantly higher objective response rate with SuperMIP (46%) compared with MIP (35%) (P=0.03) [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the response rates, 1% to 22%]. After induction chemotherapy, surgery was performed in 54 (15%) patients (27 per arm) and chest irradiation in 203 (57%) patients (102 in the MIP arm and 101 in the SuperMIP). In terms of survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two study arms (P=0.16), with median survival times of, for MIP and SuperMIP, respectively, 12.5 (95% CI 10.1-14.9) and 11.2 (95% CI 9.7-12.8) months. Haematological toxicity and dosage reductions were higher with SuperMIP, which was nevertheless associated with a significantly increased absolute dose intensity. CONCLUSIONS: High dose-intensity induction chemotherapy does not improve survival in initially unresectable non metastatic NSCLC.     

A phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background and purpose

We conducted a phase II study combining induction chemotherapy with continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

A total of 40 patients with stage III NSCLC were enrolled. All patients received 3 cycles of chemotherapy followed by CHART (56 Gy in 36 fractions over 12 days). The primary outcome measure was radiation toxicity. Secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival, disease-free survival and loco-regional progression-free survival.

Results

Acute radiation toxicity was minimal and there were no significant late toxicities. The response rate after completion of chemoradiation was 65%. The median and 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional progression-free survivals were 15.7 months, 28%; 12.1 months, 23%; and 26.4 months, 51%, respectively.

Conclusions

Induction chemotherapy can be safely combined with CHART. The survival results are consistent with previous studies of chemotherapy followed by accelerated radiotherapy. This approach should be compared with synchronous chemoradiation to determine if it represents a less toxic alternative.