Endoscopic Surgery: Ideal for Endocrine Surgery?

The laparoscopic approach of endocrine tumors is recent, the first reported resection of an adrenal gland in 1992. It represents a revolution in endocrine surgery equivalent to that observed in general surgery after the first cholecystectomy was performed in 1987. This new approach needs evaluation in terms of feasibility, indications, safety, and surgical procedure to define its potential advantages. The surgical technique and operative approaches of laparoscopic adrenalectomies are at the present time well defined and mostly accepted. Pancreatic approaches and resections, thyroidectomies, and parathyroidectomies are more confidential and performed only by rare teams. Nevertheless, the development of this technique is ineluctable. The spread of this technique, partly due to the increased quality of the technologies available, especially cameras, encounter a major brake that limits its generalization: If general surgeons commonly perform laparoscopy in their daily practice, they treat few patients presenting endocrine disorders. On the other hand, endocrine surgeons to whom many patients are referred do not have regular videoscopic practice. Endocrine surgery benefit few patients for these reasons. An analysis of the present state of the art allows us to imagine the evolution and future of videoscopic endocrine surgery.     

Surgery Alert摘要

Ciatto 等根据1973～1985年期间意大利11个医疗中心的各期乳癌3627例,分析了术前常规进行转移灶(M)检查的价值。尽管有些病人未作全部规定的检查,但所获资料已足以使有关临床医师作出合理的推断。各项检查的检出率分别为:胸部 X 线片0.30%,骨扫描0.90%,骨 X 线片0.64%,肝超声0.24%,肝     

Surgery Alerl 摘要

由于单纯的切开引流术常有良好疗效,对潜毛脓肿成窦者是否必须再行二期手术多有争议。许多专家主张在切开引流后4～8周再行病灶切除。Jensen等最近报告了用切开引流术治疗73例潜毛脓肿的经验。处理前出现症状的中位期为8天(5～11天)。全组病人均作了十字形切开并切去皮瓣四角。每     

Surgery Alert摘要

在浸润性乳癌的治疗中,肿块局部切除(局切) 放疗的效果并不亚于乳房切除术(乳切)。事实上,在精心设计的对照试验中,乳切从未被证明优于局切 放疗。然而,局切后可以产生复发。Kurtz 等取1963～1980年在法国马赛肿瘤研究所作局切,而在1987年1月前复发的病人143例进行了深入分析。该组病人占同期同类病人1245名的11.5%。在143例中,选1985年12月以前作第二次手术的118例作为本     

Total Joint Arthroplasty Surgery: Does Day of Surgery Matter?

Length of stay (LOS) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) impacts the expense to the hospital. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact that day of surgery has on postoperative LOS. 547 patients who had a primary TJA at two tertiary care hospitals were identified retrospectively. TJA patients admitted on day of surgery and who had primary elective surgery were included in our sample. Patients were subdivided into one of four groups: those who had operations on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday respectively. Patients who had surgery on Thursday and Friday had significantly longer LOS when compared to Monday and Tuesday. This variation in LOS between the groups may be due to inconsistencies in weekend functionality, less experienced part-time staffing, and inaccessibility of rehabilitation personnel.     

Is Minimally Invasive Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty Really Minimally Invasive Surgery?

Minimization of soft-tissue damage is one of the primary purposes behind the application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A consecutive series of 147 TKAs were enrolled in the present study, with 96 MIS-TKAs using 11 quadriceps-sparing, 46 subvastus, 32 midvastus, and 7 parapatellar approaches and 51 conventional TKAs using 22 subvastus, 9 midvastus, and 20 parapatellar approaches. Serum levels of creatinine phosphokinase, myoglobin, aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and creatinine were measured on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14. Postoperative rising index (RI) was expressed as a proportion of the preoperative value. When RIs were compared between MIS-TKA and conventional TKA, no significant differences were found for any enzymes. Interestingly, the midvastus approach displayed the highest RIs for creatinine phosphokinase and myoglobin between the 4 vastus-splitting approaches. Consequently, degree of muscle damage was equivalent between MIS-TKA and conventional TKA, whereas types of vastus-splitting approach appeared closely related to muscle damage.     

Parathyroid Surgery in the Elderly: Should Minimally Invasive Surgery Be Abandoned?

Background

Single adenoma is the cause of 80 % of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) resulting in wide acceptance of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP). The incidence of PHPT increases with age. Little information is available regarding the prevalence of multiglandular disease (MGD) in older patients.

Methods

The records of 537 patients that underwent parathyroid surgery between January 2005 and October 2012 at two endocrine surgery referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison was performed between patients younger than 65 and older than 65 years of age. Clinical variables included preoperative laboratories and imaging, extent of neck exploration, number of glands excised, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels during surgery.

Results

There were 374 (70 %) patients in the younger age group (YG) and 163 (30 %) patients in the older age group (OG). The mean age was 50 ± 0.5 and 71 ± 0.4 years, respectively. There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender or laboratory results. MGD was significantly more common in the OG (24 % vs. 12 %; p = 0.001) and similarly MIP was less commonly completed in the OG (49 % vs. 68 %; p < 0.001). Cure rates were comparable between the OG and YG (93 % vs. 95 %; p = 0.27). In the OG, patients with MGD had significantly smaller glands as compared to patients with single adenomas in this group (331 ± 67 vs. 920 ± 97 mg; p = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusions

MGD in PHPT was found to be more prevalent in older patients. Planning a bilateral neck exploration should be considered in older patients, especially when a relatively small gland is suggested by imaging or encountered during surgery.     

Does the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery work?

Recommendations to form an independent American Board of Vascular Surgery were made several years ago by leaders in vascular surgery. All major vascular societies in the United States voted by majority rule to approve the formation of this organization. Although the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery is well intentioned, its focus and intentions are outdated because it is subservient to the American Board of Surgery.     

Do Future General Surgery Residents Have Adequate Exposure to Endocrine Surgery During Medical School?

During their general surgical rotations, medical students should ideally have exposure to a wide breadth of surgical procedures, especially if they are interested in pursuing surgical careers. To determine their exposure to endocrine surgery during medical school, we surveyed students from more than 20 medical schools who interviewed for general surgery residency positions at our institution over a 2-year period. Questions focused on the total number of index surgical procedures observed during all of their medical school education. Of 211 surveys sent, 146 were returned (66%). The mean age of the students was 26.0 +/- 0.3 years, and 21% were women. The average times spent on general surgery and surgery subspecialty rotations during medical school were 11.1 +/- 0.6 weeks and 7.6 +/- 0.4 weeks, respectively. The mean number of thyroidectomies (2.8 +/- 0.3), parathyroidectomies (1.9 +/- 0.3), and adrenalectomies (0.5 +/- 0.1) observed by the medical students were significantly lower than operations such as mastectomies (9.4 +/- 0.3), coronary bypass surgeries (8.7 +/- 1.4), and laparoscopic cholecystectomies (10.0 +/- 0.7). Furthermore, of these 146 future surgical residents, 34% failed to observe a single thyroid resection, 42% did not see a parathyroidectomy, and 65% failed to see an adrenalectomy. In conclusion, future general surgery residents seem to observe a wide variety of surgical cases, but most have little or no exposure to endocrine surgery. This paucity of exposure may have significant educational and career ramifications.     

Does Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Work?

A recent randomized trial from the Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study Group was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and attempted to determine the efficacy of partial meniscectomy without osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to either arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or sham surgery. The authors concluded that the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than those after the sham surgical procedure. However, there are several important limitations of this trial that make it difficult to generalize to the 700,000 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies performed in the United States each year. In this small sample of 146 patients, patients with traumatic meniscal tears and locking symptoms—those most likely to benefit from a partial meniscectomy—were excluded. In addition, although patients with radiographic arthritis were excluded, most of the patients in the study had degenerative changes at the time of arthroscopy. Therefore it is difficult to determine whether the patients were symptomatic from their chondral degeneration or their degenerative meniscal tear. In our opinion this study does not change the role of surgery in current clinical practice. The primary indication for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy remains symptoms of well-localized joint line pain with acute onset and mechanical symptoms such as catching or locking that have failed comprehensive nonoperative management.