Should the Extended Lateral Approach Remain Part of Standard Treatment in Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open reduction and internal fixation through the extended lateral approach (ELA) in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures and to determine whether this approach should remain part of standard therapy. This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients with 64 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures who underwent surgical treatment through the ELA. Outcome measures were the visual analog scale foot and ankle (VAS FA), the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, surgical site infections (SSIs), and reoperations. We determined the AOFAS score for 40 patients with 42 fractures, and 42 patients with 44 fractures completed the VAS FA questionnaire. The mean VAS FA score was 61.0 ± 23.4 and the median AOFAS score was 83 (range 33 to 100), with 55% good to excellent scores. We found 10.9% superficial SSIs successfully treated with antibiotics. In 4.7% of patients a deep SSI was diagnosed, wherefore premature implant removal was necessary. Patients with an SSI did not have significantly lower VAS FA or AOFAS scores than did patients without an SSI (p = .318 and p = .766, respectively). Implant removal in absence of SSIs was necessary in 17 patients because of pain, and 3 patients needed secondary arthrodesis because of persistent pain. We concluded that the ELA proved to be a safe procedure, and moreover the most common complications did not influence the long-term outcomes of patients. However, recent literature demonstrates that less invasive techniques seem to exceed the ELA with respect to wound complications.     

What Is Appropriate Treatment for Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus?

Recent advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have yielded a variety of new options for management of this highly lethal disease. Various approaches to surgical resection have been proposed. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy with or without surgery have been tested in numerous trials, the results of which are often conflicting and confusing for clinicians. The changing epidemiology of the disease between East and West adds to the controversy. In this review, the authors address some of the more controversial debates. The following questions are asked: What is the appropriate approach for surgical resection? What is the appropriate extent of resection? Is multimodality treatment appropriate for esophageal cancer?     

Is the Retrojugular Approach Safer Than the Conventional Approach for Carotid Endarterectomy?

Background  The retrojugular approach is promoted as an alternative to traditional antejugular carotid endarterectomy. Absence of named posterior venous branches and ease of distal internal carotid dissection reduce time for carotid exposure together with improved distal exposure. However, a higher incidence of local nerve injury and persistent hoarse voice has been reported. We compare the incidence of these and other complications for the antejugular and retrojugular approaches. Design  This is a nonrandomised retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Results  Our 178 patients formed two groups who were homogeneous in terms of sex and age. Mean operative times, patch usage, and general/local anaesthesia did not differ significantly for the two groups. Postoperative complications including transient ischemic attack (TIA), major stroke, or death; hypertension; miosis; and hypoglossal injury were similar for the two groups. However, there was a significantly increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice (p < 0.05) in the retrojugular group. Conclusions  Reports of increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice associated with the retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy are supported by our findings, which point to a learning curve effect. A randomized controlled trial would be necessary before any strong recommendation could be made for or against the retrojugular approach.     

Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?

ObjectiveAs the population in general is living longer, less invasive adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) surgery that balances risks and benefits requires long‐term clinical outcomes to determine its strengths and weaknesses. We design a retrospective study to compare the postoperative mid‐ and long‐term outcomes in terms of efficacy, surgical complications, and reoperation rate of patients with ADS treated with two different surgical approaches (long‐segment complete reconstruction or short‐segment limited intervention).MethodsIn this retrospective study, 78 patients with ADS (Lenke–Silva levels III or higher), who accepted surgical treatment at our hospital between June 2012 and June 2019 were included. These patients were assigned to the long‐segment radical group (complete decompression with deformity correction involves ≥3 segments) and the short‐segment limited group (symptomatic segment decompression involves <3 segments). In addition, general information such as age, gender, fixed segment number, efficacy, radiographic parameters, and reoperation rate of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, follow‐up time, long‐term surgical complications and reoperation rate (P > 0.05). The mean age of patients in the long‐segment strategy group was 57.1 ± 7.9 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 7.9 ± 2.4. The mean age of patients in the short‐segment strategy group was 60.8 ± 8.4 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 1.4 ± 0.5. At the final follow‐up visit, the long‐segment radical group showed better results than the short‐segment limited group with regard to coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis angle and sagittal balance (P < 0.05). The long‐segment strategy group had a higher implant‐related complication rate (P = 0.010); the adjacent segment‐related complication in the two groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.068).ConclusionConsidering the risk, rehabilitation pathway and costs of long‐segment radical surgery, short‐segment limited intervention is a better strategy for patients who cannot tolerate the long‐segment surgery, improving symptoms and maintaining efficacy in the mid‐ and long‐term, and not increasing the reoperation rate.     

Is an Algorithmic Approach to the Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation After THA Effective?

Background  

The indications for surgical techniques for treatment of recurrent hip dislocation after THA differ, and their rates of achievement of stability may not be similar.     

Simultaneous Gastric Banding and Cholecystectomy in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Is it Feasible?

Background: In the last decade, laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity has become widely employed, including a marked increase in the placement of adjustable gastric bands (AGB). Among the co-morbidities of morbid obesity is cholelithiasis. The question arises whether concomitant cholecystectomy increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications due to the association of a potentially contaminated procedure with a clean operation, placement of an AGB. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative outcome in patients submitted to laparoscopic AGB with cholecystectomy. Methods: From January 2000 to January 2004, 308 patients (85 men and 223 women) had AGB placed. BMI ranged from 38.9 to 65.6 kg/m² (mean 41.6). In 17 patients (5.5%), gallstones were detected by ultrasonography, and cholecystectomy was performed together with the AGB. Mean operative time for placement of the AGB was 58 ± 18 min, and in those with cholecystectomy 86 ± 17min (P =0.20). Results: All patients that had placement of AGB and cholecystectomy had satisfactory postoperative outcome. No infectious complications were observed. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed simultaneously with placement of an AGB has been a safe procedure.     

Is Surveillance an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses?

OBJECTIVES: To review the natural history and biological potential of small renal masses in order to evaluate whether surveillance is an option for treatment of small renal masses. METHODS: Literature search of MEDLINE and additional references from non-MEDLINE-indexed publications concerning surveillance of small renal masses. RESULTS: Because approximately 26-33% of observed small renal masses do not show radiographic growth, it has been suggested that a brief period of active surveillance may be feasible for selected renal masses, with treatment limited to tumours showing growth. Even though tumour growth might be absent or slow, a proportion of these tumours will express significant malignant behaviour. The biological behaviour of a tumour cannot be unambiguously predicted at present. Surveillance of small renal masses should only be considered in elderly and/or infirm patients with competing health risks, in those with limited life expectancy, and in those for whom surgery is not an option. In all other patients, active surveillance can be considered in the context of a study protocol only. In the majority of the patients, nephron-sparing surgery remains the gold standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance should only be considered as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of small renal masses in selected patients. It should always be combined with close follow-up imaging and should be allowed only when the patient and the urologist accept the calculated risk. Long-term, prospective studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment of the natural history and metastastic potential of small renal masses.     

Editorial Commentary: Is the Lateral Center-Edge Angle Sufficient for the Approximation of Acetabular Coverage?

The lateral center-edge angle is a robust technique with proven clinical applicability for quantifying acetabular coverage. However, it measures only the lateral coverage of the femoral head without consideration of other important portions of the acetabulum such as the anterior or posterior wall. Three-dimensional acetabular coverage measurement techniques capable of quantifying the entire acetabulum have become available, thus posing the question of whether we should still rely on the lateral center-edge angle for the assessment of acetabular coverage.     

Is Intraoperative Imprint Cytology Evaluation Still Feasible for the Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast?

Background  

The evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from a patient with lobular breast cancer is challenging. Metastatic lobular cancer is difficult to identify in SLNs because of its low-grade cytomorphology and its tendency to resemble lymphocytes. Intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) is a rapid, reliable method for evaluating SLNs intraoperatively. We sought to reexamine our experience with this technique in the identification of invasive lobular breast cancer SLN metastases.