Outcome of repeated micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

Aim： To evaluate the outcome of repetitive micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction （mTESE） attempts in non-obstructive azoospermia （NOA） cases, in relation to patients＇ initial testicular histology results. Methods： A total of 68 patients with NOA in whom mTESE had been performed in previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection （ICSI） attempts were reviewed. Results： Among the 68 patients with NOA, the first mTESE yielded mature sperm for ICSI in 44 （64%） （Sp^＋）, and failed in the remaining 24 （36%） （Sp^-）. Following their first trial, 24 patients decided to undergo a second mTESE. Of these 24 patients, no spermatozoa were obtained in 5 patients, and Sp^＋ but no fertilization/pregnancy were achieved in 19. In these 24 cases, mTESE was successively repeated for two （n = 24）, three （n = 4） and four （n = 1） times. The second attempt yielded mature sperm in 3/5 patients from the Sp group and 16/19 patients from the Sp^＋ group. At the third and fourth trials, 4/4 and 1/1 of the original Sp^＋ patients were Sp^＋ again, respectively. Distribution of main testicular histology included Sertoli cell-only syndrome （16%）, maturation arrest （22%）, hypospermatogenesis （21%） and focal spermatogenesis （41%）. Overall, in repetitive mTESE, 24/29 （82%） of the attempts were finally Sp^＋. Conclusion： Repeated mTESE in patients with NOA is a feasible option, yielding considerably high sperm recovery rate. In patients with NOA, mTESE may safely be repeated one or more times to increase sperm retrieval rate, as well as to increase the chance of retrieving fresh spermatozoa to enable ICSI.     

Outcome of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in familial idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sperm retrieval rate by microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in familial idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). One hundred and nineteen patients with idiopathic NOA who underwent microsurgical TESE over the past 5 years were included. Patients were then divided into two groups; Group ‘A’ with familial idiopathic NOA (11 families with two brothers in each family, 22 patients) and Group ‘B’ with nonfamilial idiopathic NOA (97 patients). Clinical data as well as data of microsurgical TESE were recorded. In Group ‘A’, the sperm retrieval rate was 9.1% (2/22 patients) compared to 45.4% in Group ‘B’ (44/97 patients) (P ≤ 0.05). The two patients in Group ‘A’ with successful sperm retrieval belonged to one family. The histopathological diagnosis was the same in the brothers in each family. It can be concluded that the testicular sperm retrieval rate in familial idiopathic NOA is significantly lower than in nonfamilial idiopathic NOA.     

Parameters predicting sperm retrieval rates during microscopic testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the parameters that might have an effect on the success of microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro‐TESE) in infertile patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Between 2003 and 2014, 860 patients with NOA were retrospectively analysed. The effect of age, infertility duration, history of varicocelectomy, herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy, presence of solitary testis, tobacco use, previous testicular biopsy results, history of orchitis, usage of human chorionic gonadotropin in the past three months, presence of undescended or retractile testis, presence of varicocele, testicular volume, levels of serum follicle‐stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, and testosterone, presence of Klinefelter syndrome and micro‐deletion of Y chromosome on sperm retrieval rates were evaluated. In 45.8% (n = 394) of the patients who underwent micro‐TESE, spermatozoon was adequately obtained. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that previous successful testicular biopsy (OR = 15.346; GA = 5.45–43.16; p < .001) and higher testicular volumes significantly increase sperm retrieval rate in micro‐TESE. The testicular volume cut‐off as 11 ml was found to be the most significant factor. Although currently testicular biopsy result is not being used as a diagnostic method, it is significantly associated with micro‐TESE result.     

Impact of testicular histopathology as a predictor of sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcome in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: correlation with clinical and hormonal factors

In this study, our objective was to evaluate the impact of testicular histopathology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and correlate with clinical and hormonal parameters. For this purpose, 271 patients with nonobstructive azospermia (NOA) who underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for ICSI cycles were retrospectively evaluated for sperm retrieval, fertilisation, embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among different testicular histology groups. We also correlated hormonal and clinical factors with histological findings. Sperm retrieval and fertilisation rates (FR) were found to be significantly different among all testicular histological groups of NOA except for embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Furthermore, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level was the most significant variable to predict sperm recovery on TESE. Separate analyses within each testicular histological group revealed that higher FSH was also associated with lower pregnancy rates in only maturation arrest group. In conclusion, testicular histology significantly influences sperm retrieval and FRs but not pregnancy and live birth rates in nonobstructive azoospermia. However, FSH is the best predictor of a successful TESE.     

Clinical analysis of patients with azoospermia factor deletions by microdissection testicular sperm extraction

Microdeletions of the azoospermia factor (AZF) locus on the Y chromosome have been implicated as a major genetic component of idiopathic male infertility, and the incidence of AZF deletions has been reported to be 15-20% in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Numerous studies have described AZF deletion rates in patients with azoospermia; however, a clinical comparison of azoospermic patients with AZF deletion and those with no deletion has not been reported well. A new technique for testicular sperm extraction, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE), has been used widely on NOA patients. Although testicular spermatozoa are reliably detected and retrieved from NOA patients by microdissection TESE, sperm retrieval rates for patients with AZF deletions are not well known. Therefore, characteristics of NOA patients with AZF deletion were investigated. Six of 60 patients (10%) who underwent microdissection TESE were found to have AZF deletions by genomic polymerase chain reaction. Testicular data, outcome of sperm retrieval and endocrinological profiles, were compared between patients with AZF deletions (n = 6) and those with no deletions (n = 54). Testicular size, varicocele rates and testicular histology were similar between the groups. Significant differences were not detected in the endocrinological profiles. Sperm retrieval rates were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, AZF deletions do not appear to confer specific characteristics to NOA patients.     

The predictive value of parameters of clinical presentations for sperm yield in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia receiving microdissection testicular sperm extraction

ObjectiveWe analyzed a cohort of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients receiving microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to examine the relationship of sperm yield and the parameters of clinical presentations. We aim to identify the parameters that might positively predict a positive sperm yield after mTESE.Materials and methodsA total of 200 patients with NOA who had undergone mTESE were enrolled. Among them, 112 (56%) had received a prior testicular needle biopsy. Clinical data including physical findings, underlying genetic abnormalities, pathologic findings in needle biopsy, and sperm retrieval rate (SRR) during mTESE were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe pathological findings of prior needle biopsy demonstrate a predictive value of sperm yield during mTESE. Hypospermatogenesis had SRR of 93.3% during mTESE, early maturation arrest had SRR of 13.3%, late maturation arrest (LMA) had SRR of 66.7%, and Sertoli cell-only syndrome had SRR of 18.1%. Regarding parameters of clinical presentation, we found that SRR during mTESE was 85.7% for patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, 60.0% for men with undescended testes (UDT) history, 50.0% for patients who had been exposed to chemotherapeutics due to malignancy of other organs, 100% for prior mumps infection, 50.0% for AZFc deletion, 50.0% for Klinefelter syndrome, and 33.3% for other sex chromosome-related abnormalities. No sperm was found in patients with AZFa or AZFb microdeletion. The consistency of histopathological findings between initial testis biopsy and mTESE was 77.7%. As much as 17.4% of cases had upgraded on spermatogenesis at later mTESE.ConclusionClinical presentations or phenotypes can be used as predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval during mTESE in patients with NOA. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and cases with UDT history have a higher chance of sperm retrieval. Initial testicular needle biopsy, if available, can provide valuable information about chances of sperm retrieval. Hypospermatogenesis predicts high sperm yield rate, and LMA can have best upgrade results of sperm yield after mTESE.     

In the era of micro‐dissection sperm retrieval (m‐TESE) is an isolated testicular biopsy necessary in the management of men with non‐obstructive azoospermia?

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There are a number of ways to retrieve sperm from the testis however there is no universal consensus as to which is the best approach. Furthermore, there is controversy as to whether a diagnostic biopsy has a role in management of non‐obstructive azoospermia (NOA). This study gives support to the growing consensus that micro‐dissection TESE (m‐TESE) is the optimum approach to retrieve sperm in patients with NOA even when previous attempts have failed. Moreover, it strongly suggests that histology is unreliable in determining success rates with m‐TESE and therefore isolated diagnostic biopsies should not be performed.

OBJECTIVES

• ? To assess the outcome of sperm retrieval using micro‐dissection‐TESE (m‐TESE) and simultaneous diagnostic biopsy in NOA to determine if the final definitive histology correlated with the outcome of sperm retrieval by m‐TESE in men with NOA.
• ? To determine if there was a correlation between FSH levels and positive sperm retrieval rates and assessed the success rate of m‐TESE as either a primary or a salvage procedure after previous negative sperm retrieval.
• ? The EAU guidelines (2010) recommend that in men with non obstructive azoospermia ‘a testicular biopsy is the best procedure to define the histological diagnosis and the possibility of finding sperm’. However, these guidelines do not identify which patients should have a diagnostic biopsy and if this biopsy should be performed as an isolated procedure or synchronously with sperm retrieval. It is also suggested that there is a correlation between the histological diagnosis and possibility of finding sperm on testis biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? 100 men with NOA underwent a m‐TESE sperm retrieval between 2005 and 2010 at a single centre.
• ? All patients underwent hormonal analysis (serum FSH, Testosterone and LH levels) and genetic analyses after full counselling including; Y‐deletion, CF‐gene analysis and karyotype.
• ? Thirty five men had previously undergone unsuccessful TESA/TESE or diagnostic biopsy at other centres. All patients underwent synchronous sperm retrieval and biopsy of the testis, which was sent for histopathological examination on the day of an ICSI cycle or as an isolated procedure.

RESULTS

• ? Mean age of patients was 37.25 (range 29–56 years). The mean serum FSH levels in the Sertoli cell only, maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis groups were 21.3 IU/L (2.8–75), 16.18 (1.6–67) and 14.17 IU/L (0.8–42.3) respectively. SR rates in the respective groups were 42.85%, 26.6% and 75.86% (P= 0.023). There were no post‐operative complications.
• ? In the 35 men who had previously undergone unsuccessful procedures elsewhere, the SR rates were 57.1%. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 50%. There was no correlation between SR and FSH levels (P= 0.28).

CONCLUSION

• ? M‐TESE should be considered the gold standard for retrieval of testicular sperm in NOA, even in cases where there has been previously unsuccessful attempts. FSH levels and histology cannot be used to predict the success of sperm retrieval. An isolated diagnostic testicular biopsy is not recommended in men with NOA, as a significant proportion of men undergoing m‐TESE will have successful a sperm retrieval irrespective of previous histology or previous unsuccessful surgery.

     

Are hormone measurements and ultrasounds really predictors of sperm retrieval in testicular sperm extraction? A case report and literature review

Azoospermia can be diagnosed in about 10%–15% of the infertile male population. To overcome the problem of failure to produce spermatozoa in the ejaculate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), testicular sperm extraction (TESE) may be performed to find the focal area of spermatogenesis. A 47‐year‐old man with NOA presented for treatment of secondary couple infertility. The patient underwent a first TESE 7 years earlier with cryopreservation, and an intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer ended in a term pregnancy. He reported a history of repeated testicular traumas. At the present time, a complete medical workup was carried out, including clinical history, general and genital physical examination, scrotal and transrectal ultrasounds. Hormone measurements showed follicle‐stimulating hormone level of 42.7 IU/L, luteinising hormone of 11.4 IU/L, total testosterone of 2.6 ng/ml and right and left testicular volume, respectively, of 4 and 3.9 ml. He underwent a second TESE, with successful sperm retrieval and cryopreservation. The histological pattern was hypospermatogenesis. In cases of extreme testicular impairment, although in the presence of very high follicle‐stimulating hormone value and small testicular volume, estimating poor sperm recovery potential, the integration of clinical and anamnestic data, could help the surgeon to practise the more appropriate method of treatment.     

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update

Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) were once considered to be infertile with few treatment options due to the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. In the last two decades, the advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and the application of various testicular sperm retrieval techniques, including fine needle aspiration (FNA), conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) have revolutionized treatment in this group of men. Because most men with NOA will have isolated regions of spermatogenesis within the testis, studies have illustrated that sperm can be retrieved in most men with NOA, including Klinefelter''s syndrome (KS), prior history of chemotherapy and cryptorchidism. Micro-TESE, when compared with conventional TESE has a higher sperm retrieval rate (SRR) with fewer postoperative complications and negative effects on testicular function. In this article, we will compare the efficacy of the different procedures of sperm extraction, discuss the medical treatment and the role of testosterone optimization in men with NOA and describe the micro-TESE surgical technique. Furthermore, we will update our overall experience to allow counseling on the prognosis of sperm retrieval for the specific subsets of NOA.     

Can spermatozoa be retrieved in non‐obstructive azoospermic patients with high FSH level?: A retrospective cohort study

We aimed in this retrospective study to evaluate non‐surgical preoperative parameters and testicular histopathology in determining the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in non‐obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients. We evaluated the data of 1,395 consecutive patients who underwent 1st time micro‐dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro‐TESE) that was done by fifteen different senior andrologists and a consequent undefined number of biologists assisting them in the operative rooms from January 2010 to May 2013 in a specialised IVF centre. Our study did not demonstrate any statistical significance between the mean age, the mean duration of infertility and finally, the mean of FSH levels of the patients with positive and negative micro‐TESE outcomes (p‐value 0.391, 0.543, 0.767 respectively). Moreover, our study did not demonstrate any association between different types of hormonal therapy prior to micro‐TESE and patients with positive micro‐TESE outcome (p‐value 0.219). Interestingly, our study showed positive associations between the testicular histopathology SCO (sertoli cell only syndrome) and high FSH and sperm retrieval rate (p < 0.001, 0.02 respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed high statistical significance between sperm retrieval rate and high FSH level and testicular histopathology (OR 1.6, 0.21, 95% CI lower 1.2, 0.008 and upper 2.1, 0.06 and finally p 0.003, <0.001 respectively). This study reveals that preoperative testicular biopsy is unnecessary to predict the sperm retrieval rate in NOA patients.     

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection by testicular sperm in patients with aspermia or azoospermia after cancer treatment

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficiency of testicular biopsy and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with aspermia or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) after cancer treatment. From 1996 to 2003, 30 men with a history of cancer, affected by aspermia or NOA and without sperm cryopreserved before cytotoxic treatment underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE). In these men, clinical, hormonal and histological characteristics were compared; 13 underwent 39 TESE-ICSI cycles using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa (TESE-ICSI group). In the same period, 31 ICSI cycles were performed in 20 men with aspermia or NOA using ejaculated sperm frozen before cancer treatment (ejaculated sperm-ICSI group). Fertilization, blastocyst development, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were compared between the groups. Testicular volume, serum follicle-stimulating hormone level and Johnsen score indicated complete although reduced spermatogenesis in men with aspermia and abnormal spermatogenesis in men with NOA. After TESE, sperm retrieval was positive in 92% of men with aspermia and 58% of men with NOA. In TESE-ICSI patients with NOA a significantly lower proportion of embryos developed to the blastocyst stage than in patients with aspermia and in those after ICSI with frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm (23% vs. 43% and 47%, p = 0.03 and p < 0.01 respectively). In all groups the miscarriage rates were high; in patients with aspermia and NOA, characterized by increased age, the miscarriage rate tended to be higher in spite of similar female age and female indications of infertility. In patients affected by aspermia or NOA after cancer treatment and without sperm cryopreserved before treatment, TESE-ICSI using testicular sperm provide a chance to father a child.     

Effects of obesity on sperm retrieval,early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in men with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing testicular sperm aspiration‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of body mass index (BMI) on sperm retrieval, early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing testicular sperm aspiration‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection (TESA‐ICSI). A total of 3,005 infertile couples were evaluated between January 2010 and June 2017, including 1585 normal‐weight (BMI < 25 kg/m²), 847 overweight (BMI 25–29.99 kg/m²) and 573 obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) patients. We found no significant relationship between BMI and sperm retrieval rate (22.4%, 24.3% and 25.1%, p = 0.327) or sperm motility. Among the 705 patients with NOA who underwent TESA‐ICSI cycles, obese individuals had lower T levels and higher E2 levels than normal‐weight and overweight individuals. However, there were no significant differences in other male hormones (follicle stimulating hormone [FSH], luteinizing hormone [LH], or prolactin [PRL]) among the groups. We also found that the sperm parameters, embryo quality and clinical outcomes of patients with NOA undergoing TESA‐ICSI were not influenced by high BMI levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrated a lack of obvious effects of obesity on sperm retrieval, early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in infertile men undergoing TESA‐ICSI cycles, although T and E2 levels were affected.     

Seminal level of clusterin in infertile men as a significant biomarker reflecting spermatogenesis

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of seminal clusterin level on spermatogenesis in infertile men. This study included 89 men who visited our clinic due to infertility, consisting of 28, 33, and 28 diagnosed with normospermia, oligozoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) respectively. The seminal clusterin concentrations measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay were 47.9, 28.2 and 18.4 ng ml^?1 in men with normospermia, oligozoospermia and NOA, respectively, with significant differences among these three groups (P < 0.01). Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD‐TESE) was performed in the 28 men with NOA, and spermatozoon was successfully retrieved from 9. There was a significant correlation between seminal clusterin level and testicular clusterin protein expression evaluated by immunohistochemical staining in these men with NOA (P = 0.026). Of several parameters available before MD‐TESE, the univariate analysis identified serum follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) level <10 IU ml^?1 and seminal clusterin level ≥18 ng ml^?1 as significant predictors of sperm retrieval, and of these, only serum FSH level <10 IU ml^?1 was shown to be independently associated with sperm retrieval in the multivariate analysis. Accordingly, it might be worthy to further evaluate the significance of seminal clusterin level as a biomarker for the assessment of spermatogenic status in infertile men.     

Combined trifocal and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the best technique for testicular sperm retrieval in "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia

Background

There is no consensus for the best testicular sperm extraction (TESE) technique in patients with “low-chance” nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Objective

To determine sperm retrieval rates in an intraindividual comparison using three locations of the testicle with and without the assistance of a microscope (microsurgical TESE [M-TESE]).

Design, setting, and participants

A series of 65 patients with low-chance NOA presenting with low testicular volume (<8 ml) and high serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (>12.4 IU/l) underwent trifocal-TESE plus M-TESE bilaterally (four biopsies per testis).

Intervention

Sperm retrieval was performed as trifocal-TESE (upper, middle, and lower testicular pole) with and without the assistance of a microscope in the middle incision.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The number of evaluated tubules, the mean spermatogenetic scores, and the sperm retrieval rates were evaluated to determine retrieval locations and the use of the microscope. The Friedman and Cochrane Q tests were applied to determine statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for the analysis of serum FSH and testicular volume as preoperative prognostic factors.

Results and limitations

The sperm retrieval success of 66.2% using the combined technique, meaning the percentage of patients with at least one tubule containing elongated spermatids, was the highest in the combination of trifocal- and M-TESE (p < 0.01), indicating this technique as optimal for patients with low-chance NOA. M-TESE and trifocal-TESE alone were not significantly better. The mean spermatogenetic score giving the number of tubules with elongated spermatids in relation to all tubules was significantly higher in M-TESE versus conventional TESE (p < 0.01), indicating the superior quality of the tissue harvested using the microscope. These results are limited by the definition of “success” using “one” spermatid/tubule. Preoperatively, high serum FSH and low testicular volumes did not exclude successful sperm retrieval.

Conclusions

The combination of trifocal- and M-TESE is the best technique to reach high sperm retrieval rates in patients with low-chance NOA.     

Paternal age as an independent factor does not affect embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes of testicular sperm extraction‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermia

This study was performed to evaluate the independent influence of paternal age affecting embryo development and pregnancy using testicular sperm extraction (TESE)‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Paternal patients were divided into the following groups: ≤30 years, 31–35 years, 36–40 years, 41–45 years and ≥46 years. There were no differences in the rates of fertilisation or embryo quality according to paternal and maternal age. However, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly lower between those ≥46 years of paternal age compared with other age groups. Fertilisation rate was higher in the OA than the NOA, while embryo quality, pregnancy and delivery results were similar. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly lower for patients ≥46 years of paternal age compared with younger age groups. In conclusion, fertilisation using TESE in azoospermia was not affected by the independent influence of paternal age; however, as maternal age increased concomitantly with paternal age, rates of pregnancy and delivery differed between those with paternal age <41 years and ≥46 years. Therefore, paternal age ≥46 years old should be considered when applying TESE‐ICSI in cases of azoospermia, and patients should be advised of the associated low pregnancy rates.     

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: Prediction, outcome, and complications

Testicular spermatozoa can be retrieved successfully by the testicular sperm extraction (TESE) procedure and used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). The successful application of TESE depends on the identification of seminiferous tubules containing spermatozoa; testicular tubules of patients with NOA are usually heterogeneous, and TESE may not always be successful in these patients. Microdissection TESE with an operative microscope is advantageous because larger, more opaque, and whitish tubules, presumably containing germ cells with active spermatogenesis, can be identified directly. This procedure is currently the best method for the certain identification of sperm, resulting in a high spermatozoa retrieval rate and minimal postoperative complications. The present review considers the surgical procedure, outcome, prediction for spermatozoa retrieval, and postoperative complications of microdissection TESE.     

The utility of optical loupe magnification for testis sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia

The testis of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) harbors sperm in approximately 30% to 60% of cases. Use of an operating microscope has been shown to result in better sperm retrieval rates. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the ability of a modified microsurgical approach using magnifying loupes (3.5x) to improve the rates of sperm retrieval during testis sperm extraction (TESE). The study group consisted of patients with NOA who underwent TESE. Before December 1998, TESE was conducted in a standard fashion, and from 1999 on, loupe magnification was used. Comparison was made between the 2 groups with regard to sperm retrieval rates, need for bilateral TESE, and number of tunical incisions. Overall sperm retrieval rates did not differ between the 2 groups (45% vs 50%). However, in patients with testicular volumes of 10 mL or less, patients who underwent standard TESE had a retrieval rate of 27% compared with 42% when using the optical loupe magnification (P = .025). The use of loupe magnification may permit surgeons without access to or experience using an operating microscope to obtain better rates of sperm retrieval in men with NOA who have testicular volumes of 10 mL or less.     

Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia

The development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) opened a new era in the field of assisted reproduction and revolutionized the assisted reproductive technology protocols for couples with male factor infertility. Fertilisation and pregnancies can be achieved with spermatozoa recovered not only from the ejaculate but also from the seminiferous tubules. The most common methods for retrieving testicular sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are testicular sperm aspiration (TESA: needle/fine needle aspiration) and open testicular biopsy (testicular sperm extraction: TESE). The optimal technique for sperm extraction should be minimally invasive and avoid destruction of testicular function, without compromising the chance to retrieve adequate numbers of spermatozoa to perform ICSI. Microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), performed with an operative microscope, is widely considered to be the best method for sperm retrieval in NOA, as larger and opaque tubules, presumably with active spermatogenesis, can be directly identified, resulting in higher spermatozoa retrieval rates with minimal tissue loss and low postoperative complications. Micro-TESE, in combination with ICSI, is applicable in all cases of NOA, including Klinefelter syndrome (KS). The outcomes of surgical sperm retrieval, primarily in NOA patients with elevated serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (NOA including KS patients), are reviewed along with the phenotypic features. The predictive factors for surgical sperm retrieval and outcomes of treatment were analysed. Finally, the short- and long-term complications in micro-TESE in both 46XY males with NOA and KS patients are considered.     

Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia: multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration

To compare the efficacy of 2 sperm-retrieval procedures, testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. The presence of mature testicular sperm cells and motility were evaluated in 87 men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) by means of multifocal TESE and multifocal TESA, which were performed during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. Sperm cells were recovered by TESE in 54 cases, but by TESA in only 36 cases. There were significantly more cases (n = 20) in which sperm cells were recovered by TESE only, compared with 2 cases in whom cells were recovered by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). The mean number of locations in each testis in which sperm cells were detected was significantly higher in the TESE group. In significantly more cases (n = 27), motility was observed in TESE material only, compared with 3 cases in which motility was present in material extracted by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). Mean number of locations in each testis with motile sperm cells was significantly higher in the TESE group. The TESE procedure yielded significantly more sperm cells, as was also reflected by the difference in number of straws with cryopreserved sperm. This comparative prospective clinical study revealed that multifocal TESE is more efficient than multifocal TESA for sperm detection and recovery in men with NOA and should be the procedure of choice for sperm retrieval for them.