Radiation therapy following mastectomy for axillary node-positive breast cancer: indication of chest wall irradiation

This retrospective study was conducted to determine the indication of chest wall irradiation following mastectomy in axillary node-positive breast cancer patients. Between 1982 and 1993, 103 women with axillary node-positive breast cancer received postoperative radiation therapy following mastectomy using the hockey-stick field, which included the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary nodes, without the chest wall. Ages ranged from 33 to 73 years (median: 47). Thirty-five patients underwent modified radical mastectomy, 48 radical mastectomy, and 20 extended radical mastectomy. Twenty-two patients had 1-3 positive axillary nodes, and 81 had 4 or more positive axillary nodes. The total doses ranged from 42 to 64 Gy (median 54 Gy) with a daily fraction size of 2 Gy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 75 patients, and hormone therapy was administered to 78 patients. The median follow-up time was 121 months (range, 68-191 months) for the 57 surviving patients. The actuarial overall survival rate and the chest wall control rate at 10 years for all patients were 55% and 85%, respectively. Of the 103 patients, 14 developed chest wall recurrence. In the analysis, status of vascular invasion alone had a significant impact on chest wall control. In patients with definite vascular invasion, 2 of 5 (40%) patients with 1 to 3 positive axillary nodes, and 10 of 31 (32%) with 4 or more positive axillary nodes developed chest wall recurrence. In contrast, no patients without definite vascular invasion developed chest wall recurrence. Factors such as age, menopausal status, pathology, tumor location, extent of resection, estrogen receptor status, total dose, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy did not influence the development of chest wall recurrence. Among node-positive breast cancer patients following mastectomy, those with definite vascular invasion should be delivered chest wall irradiation regardless of the number of positive axillary nodes. In contrast, those without definite vascular invasion need not be administered chest wall irradiation.     

Factors affecting long-term outcome of irradiation in carcinoma of the vagina

OBJECTIVE: This report evaluates prognostic and technical factors affecting outcome of patients with primary carcinoma of the vagina treated with definitive radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on records of 212 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina treated with irradiation. RESULTS: Tumor stage was the most significant prognostic factor; actuarial 10-year disease-free survival was 94% for Stage 0 (20 patients), 80% for Stage I (59 patients), 55% for Stage IIA (63 patients), 35% for Stage IIB (34 patients), 38% for Stage III (20 patients), and 0% for Stage IV (15 patients). All in situ lesions except one were controlled with intracavitary therapy. Of the patients with Stage I disease, 86% showed no evidence of vaginal or pelvic recurrence; most of them received interstitial or intracavitary therapy or both, and the addition of external-beam irradiation did not significantly increase survival or tumor control. In Stage IIA (paravaginal extension) and IIB (parametrial involvement) 66% and 56% of the tumors, respectively, were controlled with a combination of brachytherapy and external-beam irradiation; 13 of 20 (65%) Stage III tumors were controlled in the pelvis. Four patients with Stage IV disease (27%) had no recurrence in the pelvis. The total incidence of distant metastases was 13% in Stage I, 30% in Stage IIA, 52% in Stage IIB, 50% in Stage III, and 47% in Stage IV. The dose of irradiation delivered to the primary tumor or the parametrial extension was of relative importance in achieving successful results. In patients with Stage I disease, brachytherapy alone achieved the same local tumor control (80-100%) as in patients receiving external pelvic irradiation (78-100%) as well. In Stage II and III there was a trend toward better tumor control (57-80%) with combined external irradiation and brachytherapy than with the latter alone (33-50%) (p = 0.42). The incidence of grade 2-3 complications (12%) correlated with the stage of the tumor and type of treatment given. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for patients with vaginal carcinoma, particularly Stage I. More effective irradiation techniques, including optimization of dose distribution combining external irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy in tumors beyond Stage I, are necessary to enhance locoregional tumor control. The high incidence of distant metastases emphasizes the need for earlier diagnosis and effective systemic cytotoxic agents to improve survival in these patients.     

Influence of preoperative irradiation on failures of endometrial carcinoma with high risk of lymph node metastasis

From 1965-1980, 80 patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium, FIGO-AJC Stage I, Grade 3 and Stage II received preoperative radiation therapy. Thirty-three patients had Stage I, Grade 3 and 47 had Stage II. All patients were treated with preoperative radiation therapy (intracavitary application, external pelvic irradiation or both) followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. They were followed from 3-18 years (median, 6.2 years) after the completion of treatment and none was lost to follow-up. Overall 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 75%. Preoperative external whole pelvic plus intracavitary irradiation gave the best 5-year survival of 83%; there were no failures after 20 months. In comparison to this group, survival for the intracavitary alone group was 64% at 5 years and 54% at 8 years. The 5-year survival of Stage II was 81% compared to 66% of the Stage I, Grade 3 group. Prognostic variables were analyzed and showed that the residual tumor in the specimen at the time of surgery after the preoperative irradiation was significantly correlated to a worse prognosis: patients who were found to have no residual tumor had a 5-year survival rate of 96% compared to 65% of those who were found to have residual tumor (p less than 0.01). Age, stage, methods of preoperative irradiation, dose of external pelvic irradiation or intracavitary application were not statistically significant prognostic factors. The grade of the tumor was suggestive as a prognostic variable. The most common failure site was the para-aortic lymph nodes independent of treatment methods and stage. Four patients developed complications possibly related to the radiation therapy. Our study suggests that preoperative external and intracavitary irradiation reduces the frequency of residual microscopic carcinoma and improves survival for patients with Stage I, Grade 3 and Stage II carcinoma of the endometrium.     

Isolated local-regional recurrence following mastectomy for adenocarcinoma of the breast treated with radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery and/or chemotherapy

The results of radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery and/or chemotherapy are reported for 47 patients who presented with local and/or regional recurrence without evidence of distant metastases following initial management of adenocarcinoma of the breast with radical or modified radical mastectomy (43) or simple mastectomy (4). Patients were treated between October 1964 and March 1983 at the University of Florida; all have a 2-year minimum follow-up and 42/47 (89%) have had follow-up for greater than or equal to 5 years. The overall actuarial local-regional control rates were 80% at 2 years, 68% at 5 years, and 61% at 10 years. The 5-year actuarial local-regional control rates by site and extent of disease were as follows: single chest wall nodule, 92%; multiple chest wall nodules, 49%; regional lymph nodes, 66%; and multiple sites, 64%. The 5- and 10-year actuarial determinate disease-free survival rates for all patients were 41 and 17%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates for all patients were 50 and 34%, respectively.     

Results of mastectomy and postoperative irradiation in the management of locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the breast

Between 1955 and 1984, 376 patients with locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma were treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with mastectomy and irradiation and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with inflammatory carcinoma or synchronous bilateral primary tumors were excluded. There were 202 patients with Stage IIIA disease and 174 patients with Stage IIIB disease (AJC Staging--1983). In 124 patients the surgical management was confined to the breast only--total mastectomy (BR) and in 252 dissection of the axilla was performed--extended total, modified radical, or classic radical mastectomy (BR + AX). All patients had postoperative irradiation. The follow-up period ranged between 8 and 34 years. At 10 years, the actuarial disease-specific, relapse-free survival (DSRFS) rate for the entire group was 40%, and the actuarial locoregional control rate was 82%. For patients with Stage IIIA disease the DSRFS was 48% and locoregional control rate was 88%. For those with Stage IIIB disease, the figures were 30% and 74%, respectively. Most of the failures occurred within 5 years of the mastectomy and essentially all occurred within 10 years. When analyzed by type of surgery, both the locoregional control and DSRFS rates were improved by the axillary dissection, the difference being largely caused by fewer axillary node recurrences after dissection of both the breast and axilla than after removal of the breast alone. In the 252 patients in whom the axilla was assessed, the number of positive nodes was a powerful predictor of both locoregional control and survival. The DSRFS rates at 10 years for patients with 0, 1-3, and greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes were 63%, 48%, and 30%, respectively. The actuarial locoregional control rates at 10 years exceeded 95% for patients with 0-3 positive nodes and 75% for those with greater than or equal to 4 nodes. These results show that locoregionally advanced breast cancer is not a uniformly fatal disease when treated without chemotherapy and provide a baseline upon which to assess the value of adjuvant systemic therapy for this stage of disease.     

乳腺癌全乳房切除术后单纯区域复发的放疗和预后分析

目的 分析乳腺癌全乳房切除术后单纯区域复发(RR)患者的预后,探讨放疗的价值和靶区。方法 回顾性分析2001-2018年间 144例全乳房切除术后无辅助放疗、首次孤立性RR的乳腺癌患者,主要研究终点为再次局部区域复发(sLRR)、远处转移(DM)、无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)。结果 RR后中位随访82.5个月,全组患者 5年sLRR、DM、PFS和OS分别为42.1%、71.9%、22.9%和62.6%。局部治疗+全身治疗是sLRR (P<0.001)和PFS (P=0.013)的独立影响因素。局部治疗时手术+放疗组的sLRR率最低(P<0.001)。手术+放疗组的 5年原RR部位再次复发率最低(P<0.001)。做和不做胸壁放疗患者的 5年胸壁复发率分别为12.1%和14.8%(P=0.873)。非锁骨上复发者,做和不做锁骨上放疗的 5年锁骨上复发率分别为9.9%和23.8%(P=0.206)。非腋窝或内乳复发者,无论放疗与否,腋窝或内乳的 5年复发率均<10%。结论 单纯RR患者有较高的 5年OS,推荐对复发部位行手术+放疗的局部治疗联合全身治疗。不建议常规对所有患者行胸壁、腋窝或内乳的预防放疗。锁骨上预防性放疗的价值需要进一步探讨。     

Local-regional control of recurrent breast carcinoma after mastectomy: does hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy improve local control?

PURPOSE: Hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (HART) has been advocated for patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer because it is believed to enhance treatment effects in rapidly proliferating or chemoresistant tumors. This report examines the value of HART in patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer treated with multimodality therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 148 patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer after mastectomy, who were treated with definitive local irradiation and systemic therapy consisting of either tamoxifen, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or both, along with excision of the recurrent tumor when possible. Patients with distant metastases were excluded, except for two patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular nodal metastases. Patients received comprehensive irradiation to the chest wall and regional lymphatics to a median dose of 45 Gy, with a boost to 60 Gy to areas of recurrence. Sixty-eight patients (46%) were treated once daily at 2 Gy/fraction (fx), and 80 (54%) were treated twice daily at 1.5 Gy/fx. Forty-eight patients (32%), who had palpable gross disease that was unresponsive to systemic therapy and/or unresectable, were irradiated. The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 78 months. RESULTS: Overall actuarial local-regional control (LRC) rates at 5 and 10 years were 68% and 55%, respectively. Five- and ten-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 50% and 35%, 39% and 29%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that LRC was adversely affected by 1. advanced initial American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p = 0.001), 2. clinically evident residual disease at time of treatment (p < 0.0001), 3. more than three positive nodes at initial mastectomy (p = 0.014), 4. short interval from mastectomy to recurrence (< 24 months, p = 0.0007), 5. nuclear grade (III vs. I or II, p = 0.045), and 6. number of recurrent nodules (1 vs. > 1, p = 0.02). Patient age at time of recurrence (< 40 vs. > or = 40 years), recurrence location on the chest wall, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status or menopausal status did not adversely affect LRC. On multivariate analysis, only clinically evident residual disease at the time of treatment and short interval from mastectomy to recurrence remained significant. When once-a-day irradiation was compared to the twice-a-day schedule, no significant differences were seen in LRC (67% vs. 68%), OS (47% vs. 52%), or DFS (42% vs. 36%) for the entire group of patients at 5 years. Pairwise comparison of the two fractionation schedules in each of the adverse outcome subgroups identified above showed no clinically significant differences in LRC at 5 years. For the 48 patients who began radiotherapy with measurable gross local recurrence, the complete response rate to radiotherapy was 73%, with no difference seen between the two fractionation schedules. The incidence of acute and chronic radiation-related complications was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy, although well tolerated by patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer, did not result in superior local-regional control rates when compared to daily fractionated regimens. Alternative strategies, such as dose escalation or chemoradiation, may be required to improve control.     

Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: treatment results on 107 patients

From 1958 to 1985, 107 patients with a clinical and/or histopathologic diagnosis of non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer received radiotherapy as all or part of initial treatment. Therapy included definitive irradiation alone in 31 patients, irradiation with mastectomy in 16 patients, irradiation and combination chemotherapy in 23 patients, and irradiation with chemotherapy and surgery in 37 patients. Survivors have a median follow-up of 30 months. Overall median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 12 months (12% at 5 years). Local control and relapse-free survival were significantly improved for patients receiving surgery as part of initial treatment: 19% (10/52) of operated patients experienced locoregional failure vs. 70% (37/53) not operated (p less than 0.0001). The median overall actuarial survival was 24 months (17% at 5 years). Patients who received surgery showed improved survival (44 months vs. 18 months median; 37% vs. 7% at 5 years; p = 0.0004). Chemotherapy also was associated with improved relapse-free survival (18 months vs. 8 months median; 20% vs. 5% at 5 years; p = 0.02) and actuarial survival (32 months vs. 17 months median; 23% vs. 3% at 5 years; p less than 0.02). Patients treated with initial chemotherapy (usually 2-3 cycles of CAF), surgery, and postoperative irradiation followed by maintenance chemotherapy showed a 34 month median relapse-free survival (37% at 5 years RFS) and a 47 month median survival (48% at 5 years). Moderate to severe complications were seen in 25% of patients, the most frequent complication being fibrosis of the breast or chest wall. There were two fatalities secondary to Adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. This study suggests better local control, with fewer complications, when surgery and irradiation are combined with multiagent chemotherapy. Further prospective clinical trials are strongly recommended.     

Posperative radiation therapy for carcinoma of the breast: Improved results with elective irradiation of the chest wall

A review was conducted of all patients with primary cancer of the breast treated by the Radiation Therapy Department of Mount Sinai Medical Center from 1966–1978. The initial surgical procedure was radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy for 926 patients. The mean follow-up for this group was 6.42 years, the range was 1–13 years. All postoperative therapy was given with megavoltage equipment. Treatment was directed to either the peripheral lymphatics (internal mammary chain, supraclavicular and axillary apex) or to the peripheral lymphatics fossa and chest wall. The decision to include the chest wall within the treatment volume was based upon the extent of disease at the primary site and the degree of involvement of the axilla. Curves were generated to compare, by stage, control of disease for both postoperative radiotherapy techniques. The expected enhancement of local (regional) control was seen for patients with more advanced disease who received chest wall irradiation. Differences favoring the more comprehensively irradiated group were also seen in disease-free and overall survival for all three stages of disease, with statistically significant benefit in survival analysis for patients with Stage II and III disease. (Stage II-peripheral lymphatic group: 5 years = 54%; 10 years = 36%. Peripheral lymphatic plus chest wall group: 5 years = 71%; 10 years = 49 %.Stage III-peripheral lymphatic group: 5 years = 32%; 10 years = 15%. Peripheral lymphatic plus chest wall group: 5 years = 51 %; 10 years = 38%.) These results imply that microscopic residual disease within the soft tissues of the chest wall can metastasize without necessarily manifesting as regionally recurrent disease. Postoperative irradiation of the chest wall imparts additional survival advantage to a significant percentage of patients treated by radical surgery. Criteria for the inclusion of the chest wall within postoperative radiotherapy fields should be broadened.     

Locally advanced breast carcinoma: results with combined regional therapy

To define optimal regional treatment as initial management of locally advanced (Stage III & IV) breast cancer, 509 patients treated from 1966-1982 were reviewed. All patients received comprehensive postoperative irradiation of the peripheral lymphatics and chest wall, following surgical procedures varying from incisional biopsy to classical radical mastectomy. Patients were followed from 1 to over 16 years. The survival rate at 5 and 10 years for the entire series is 41% and 26%. Fifty-eight patients having radical surgery for T3 tumors and subsequently found to have negative axillary lymph nodes showed the highest rates of survival, 72% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. This was significantly better (p less than .01) than patients with T3N+ disease, (5 year survival 44%; 10 year, 29%) and T4N+ disease (44%, 39%). Four hundred seventy patients with non-inflammatory carcinoma and no supraclavicular metastases were considered technically resectable. Three hundred eighty-one of these patients underwent a definitive surgical procedure removing all gross cancer prior to irradiation and, as expected, showed higher rates of local disease control than patients having lesser surgery (79% versus 45%, p less than .01). These patients also showed markedly better rates of survival and relapse-free survival with 50% alive and 38% disease free, versus 14 and 8%, at 5 years (p less than .01). There were no 10 year survivors among the 89 technically resectable patients having less than total gross resection. Long term relapse-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer can be achieved with aggressive combined local-regional therapy. Total resection of all gross cancer prior to irradiation is recommended. Modifications of postoperative radiation therapy techniques are suggested to further improve local control rates for these advanced tumors. This large series provides a baseline for evaluation of current programs adding adjuvant systemic therapy to regional treatment.     

The significance of local recurrence of carcinoma of the breast

One hundred twenty-one patients with local or regional recurrence of carcinoma of the breast without evidence of distant metastases were treated with megavoltage radiation therapy. All patients had radical or modified radical mastectomy as their initial treatment. The 10 year survival probability of this group of patients is 26 %, with a local control probability of 46 %. Within this group of patients with recurrent disease, factors found to be associated with a poorer prognosis include peripheral nodal recurrence, advanced initial disease stage and short disease free interval. Contrary to expectation, patients with recurrence within the mastectomy scar (as opposed to chest wall recurrence wide of the scar) or a history of previous radiotherapy had poorer local control rates (although not statistically significant), without effect upon overall survival. Comprehensive radiation therapy (peripheral lymphatic plus chest wall) enhanced the local control rate for the entire group and the survival probability for patients with isolated chest wall recurrence compared with limited radiation therapy fields. (Five year survival probability: chest wall irradiation only = 27%; chest wall and peripheral lymphatic = 54%). Patients given systemic therapy at the time of local recurrence showed no survival benefit. Aggressive, comprehensive radiation therapy is indicated for locally recurrent breast cancer. More effective systemic therapy is needed, especially for higher risk patients.     

Prognosis for breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy compared with mastectomy alone. A retrospective analysis of 759 patients with stage I/II breast cancer.

Seven hundred fifty-nine patients with Stage I/II breast cancer who were treated with mastectomy alone (558 patients) or breast-conserving surgery and tangential irradiation (201 patients) were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 34 months. Axillary node status showed differences between treatment groups. Seventy-two percent of patients undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy (Lx) versus 35% of patients in the mastectomy group were pathologically node-negative, 18% Lx versus 30% mastectomy alone had one to three nodes positive, and four or more positive axillary nodes were seen in 35% of mastectomy alone patients. Reflecting this trend, overall survival (P less than 0.007), time to locoregional failure (P less than 0.0005), and time to any failure (P less than 0.0001) favored Lx patients. Correcting for axillary node status, significant differences persisted only for node-negative patients. Median actuarial survival time was 73 months for the mastectomy alone group (196 patients) versus 120 months for the Lx group (144 patients) (P less than 0.02), with significant differences also noted in time to local failure (P less than 0.003) and time to any failure (P less than 0.001). Stratification according to primary tumor size in patients who were node-negative yielded marked differences in time to locoregional failure in T1 (less than 2 cm) (P less than 0.0006) presentations, with analysis approaching significance for T2 (2 to 5 cm) lesions (P less than 0.06). Disease-free interval was greater in node-negative Lx patients for both T1 (P less than 0.007) and T2 (P less than 0.05) presentations. Overall survival was not significantly different in node-negative Lx patients when primary tumor size was considered. Improved prognosis was identified in node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy over mastectomy alone. Theoretical considerations included eradication of occult microscopic disease within the chest wall by tangential irradiation.     

Regional adjuvant irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the cecum

Forty patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum who underwent right hemicolectomy received regional irradiation for 40-45 Gy/4-5 weeks and weekly 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). Thirty-four patients received this adjuvant therapy: 12, 10, 5, 4 with Stage B2, B3, C2, C3, respectively, and 3 with abdominal metastasis. Another six patients were similarly treated for palliation because of tumor bed recurrences. Patients were followed for a median of 4 years, 21/31 patients in the adjuvant group with Stage B and C were free of disease with a median survival of 48 months (63% 5-year actuarial disease-free survival). The total local failure rate among the adjuvant group for Stage B and C was 4/31 (13%) with local failure alone occurring in 1 of 4 patients (3%). In the patients treated at our Hospital, there was significant improvement in the 5-year actuarial survival (p = 0.001) for patients with lymph node metastases who received adjuvant irradiation compared to surgery-alone. Acute radiation enteritis occurred in seven out of 40 patients (17.5%) and was severe in 2 (5%). There were no delayed complications. We conclude that adjuvant therapy markedly lowered regional recurrence and seems to improve survival in patients with lymph node metastasis when compared to a group of patients treated by surgery alone in the same institution.     

Radiotherapy after breast-conservation surgery: how much is enough?

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) clinical trials have demonstrated that breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy), axillary dissection, and breast irradiation for women with Stage I and II invasive breast carcinoma provide disease-free survival and overall survival rates equivalent to modified radical mastectomy. Breast irradiation following lumpectomy decreases the incidence of in-breast tumor recurrence compared to lumpectomy alone. The addition of adjuvant systemic therapy appears to further decrease the incidence of in-breast tumor recurrence. Irradiation of the internal mammary and supraclavicular nodal regions is not indicated for patients with Stage I and II carcinoma. Similarly, irradiation of the axilla after axillary dissection is not indicated.     

The results of radiation therapy for isolated local regional recurrence after mastectomy

Between 1967 and 1988 128 patients with isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy were treated with definitive radiation therapy. Recurrence was confined to a single site in 108 patients and multiple sites in 20. The chest wall was the most common location (86) and the supraclavicular region was the second most common (20). Surgical treatment for recurrence prior to irradiation consisted of excision of all gross disease in 78 patients and incisional biopsy in 49 patients. Irradiation was directed to the entire chest wall in 19% of patients with isolated chest wall recurrences and to the chest wall and regional nodes in 81%. In patients with isolated nodal failures, treatment was directed to the nodal site and chest wall in 87% and to the regional site alone in 13%. Patients with multiple sites received treatment to the chest wall and regional nodes in all cases. Electively treated sites usually received 4500-5000 cGy. Following excision of chest wall disease, the median dose was 6000 cGy. Gross disease on the chest wall received a median dose of 6100 cGy. Gross disease in nodal sites received a median dose of 5600 cGy; 66 patients received systemic therapy at recurrence. The 5-year actuarial local-regional control was 43%. In a multivariate analysis only the estrogen receptor status of the recurrence remained significant (p = .002). The 5-year actuarial survival was 49% with a relapse-free survival of 24%. In a multivariate analysis for survival, the disease-free interval (p = .007), local regional control (p = .006), and excisional biopsy for recurrence (p = .03) remained significant. In a multivariate analysis for relapse-free survival, the disease-free interval (p = .03), excisional biopsy (p = .0001), and the extent of axillary nodal involvement (p = .007) remained significant. In the subgroup of patients with a disease-free interval greater than or equal to 24 months, excisional biopsy, and local regional control, the 5-year survival was 61% with a relapse-free survival of 59%. This subgroup represents 18% of the entire group and has a relatively good prognosis after recurrence.     

Combined chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer: updated results in a series of 120 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate our updated data concerning survival and locoregional control in a prospective study of locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) after primary chemotherapy (CT) followed by external preoperative irradiation (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1982 and 1998, 120 patients (75 Stage IIIA, 41 Stage IIIB, and 4 Stage IIIC according to AJCC staging system 2002) were treated by four courses of induction CT with anthracycline-containing combinations followed by preoperative RT (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas) and a fifth course of CT. Three different locoregional approaches were proposed depending on tumor characteristics and tumor response. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of CT and a maintenance adjuvant CT regimen without anthracycline. The median follow-up from the beginning of treatment was 140 months. RESULTS: Mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed in 49 patients (with residual tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter or located behind the nipple or with bifocal tumor), and conservative treatment in 71 patients (39 achieved clinical complete response or partial response >90% and received additional radiation boost to initial tumor bed; 32 had residual mass < or =3 cm in diameter and were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site). Ten-year actuarial local failure rate was 13% after RT alone, 23% after wide excision and RT, and 4% after mastectomy (p = 0.1). After multivariate analysis, possibility of breast-conserving therapy was related to initial tumor size (<6 cm vs. > or =6 cm in diameter, p = 0.002). Ten-year overall metastatic disease-free survival rate was 61%. After multivariate analysis, metastatic disease-free survival rates were significantly influenced by clinical stage (Stage IIIA-B vs. IIIC, p = 0.0003), N-stage (N0 vs. N1-2a, and 3c, p = 0.017), initial tumor size (<6 cm vs. > or =6 cm in diameter, p = 0.008), and tumor response after induction CT and preoperative RT (clinically complete response + partial response vs. nonresponder, p = 0.0015). In the nonconservative breast treatment group, of the 32 patients with no change in clinical tumor size after induction CT, the 10-year metastatic disease-free survival rate was 59% with only one local relapse. Arm lymphedema was noted in 17% (14 of 81) after axillary dissection and in 2.5% (1 of 39) without axillary dissection. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in 70% of patients treated by RT alone and in 51.5% of patients after wide excision and RT. CONCLUSION: Despite the poor prognosis of patients with LABC resistant to primary anthracycline-based regimen, aggressive locoregional management using preoperative RT and mastectomy with axillary dissection offers a possibility of long-term survival with low local failure rate for patients without extensive nodal disease. On the other hand, the rate of local failure seems to be high in patients with clinical partial tumor response after induction CT and breast-conserving treatment combining preoperative RT and large wide excision.     

Prognostic factors in patients with isolated recurrences of breast cancer (stage IV-NED)

Background: One to 10% of women with metastatic breast cancer have a recurrence of their disease as an isolated lesion (local, regional, or distant) which may be treated by surgical resection, irradiation, or both. These are patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease, or stage IV-NED. Because natural history and prognostic factors for patients with stage IV-NED are poorly determined, we decided to evaluate a group of patients with stage IV-NED treated at a single institution.Patients and methods: Ninety-six patients with isolated recurrence of stage IV breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment of loco-regional or distant recurrence was surgery in 18 patients and surgery plus irradiation in 78 patients. Seventy-nine patients received systemic therapy after loco-regional treatment (24 chemotherapy and 55 hormonotherapy). Prognostic factors were analyzed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Five-year DFS and OS for the whole group were 29% and 49% respectively. On the univariate analysis, patients without axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy had significantly greater 5-year DFS and OS than patients with nodal involvement (51% vs. 14% and 70% vs. 34% respectively, p< 0.05). DFS was also significantly better for patients receiving systemic therapy after local treatment (31% vs. 19%). On the multivariate analysis, absence of nodal involvement and systemic therapy were associated with longer DFS (p = 0.044 and p = 0.008, respectively) and OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011, respectively). None of the other factors analyzed including menopausal status, T-stage, number of involved nodes, receptor status, adjuvant therapy, sites of first recurrence, or time from mastectomy to first recurrence had a predictive value for DFS and OS.Conclusion: Patients with stage IV-NED have poor prognosis due to early development of metastatic disease. Absence of axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy and systemic therapy following local management is associated with improved DFS and OS. These results suggest that systemic therapy after local treatment in stage IV-NED is indicated. Poor prognosis in patients with previous nodal involvement warrants new approaches.     

Localized non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast

Chart review identified 18 patients seen at Memorial Hospital from 1970 to 1984 with primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma localized to the breast. Sixteen involved the breast alone (Stage IE), whereas two also involved ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes (Stage IIE). None had B symptoms. Histologic subtypes included 11 diffuse histiocytic, 4 diffuse poorly differentiated, 2 diffuse mixed and one nodular mixed. Thirteen patients (72%) are alive with 55 months median follow-up (11 months-14 years). Three patients died with recurrent disease at less than 2 years, one recurred at 4 years and died 6 years after diagnosis, and one died at 30 months without clinical evidence of disease. Seven (39%) have remained continuously disease-free (11 months-11 years; median, 54 months). Of the clinical Stage I patients, 1 of 3 treated with mastectomy alone recurred in the scar, whereas 1 of 12 treated with irradiation alone recurred locally. Thus, radiation therapy alone achieved good local control, although distant relapses remain a problem in these clinically staged patients. Overall, the outcome of clinically localized non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast is similar to that for localized lymphoma in other sites.     

Radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery in the treatment of barrel-shaped carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stages IB, IIA, IIB)

This retrospective analysis reports the results of therapy in 128 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix classified as barrel-shaped or expanded cervix (over 5 cm in diameter). Seventy-five percent of the patients were treated with irradiation alone and 25% with combinations of irradiation and surgery. The results of therapy are compared with those observed in 714 patients with non-barrel-shaped carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with similar techniques during the same period of time. The distribution of histological type of tumor was similar in both groups (90% epidermoid carcinoma, 8% adenocarcinoma, and 2% adenosquamous carcinoma). Approximately 15% of the patients in both groups with Stage IB and 25% with Stage IIA and IIB had positive endometrial curettings (stromal invasion or replacement by tumor only). Thus, the aggressive behavior observed in the barrel-shaped tumors is not a result of endometrial involvement, but to the large volume of tumor present. The actuarial 5-year tumor free survival in Stage IB barrel-shaped cervix was 76% compared to 92% in the non-barrel-shaped lesions. In Stage IIA the 5-year NED survival for patients with barrel-shaped cervix was 60 compared to 80% for the patients with non-barrel-shaped cervix. In Stage IIB the survival rates were 58 and 70%, respectively. A noteworthy finding in this analysis is the high incidence of distant metastases in the patients with barrel-shaped cervix (32% in Stage IB, 40% in Stage IIA, and 32% in Stage IIB) in comparison with patients with non-barrel-shaped tumors (10% in Stage IB, 16% in Stage IIA, and 25% in Stage IIB). The incidence of pelvic failures was comparable in both groups. Higher doses of irradiation resulted in better tumor control, which was comparable to that observed with a combination of irradiation and surgery (conservative hysterectomy). The 5-year survival rate in Stage IB was similar in both the barrel-shaped and non-barrel-shaped tumors treated with irradiation alone or combination irradiation and surgery. In Stage IIA the non-barrel-shaped lesions had the same survival with either treatment technique. In the barrel-shape group, eight patients treated with irradiation alone or survival of 70%, compared to 45% in 24 patients treated with irradiation alone. However, these differences are not statistically significant (p = .50). In eight patients treated with definitive irradiation and a lymphadenectomy and four patients irradiated after an exploratory laparotomy, two major and three minor (grade 2) complications were noted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer: impact on local recurrence and overall survival

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have renewed an old controversy about the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy following mastectomy for breast cancer. Radiotherapy is usually recommended for advanced disease, but whether or not to use it in pT1-T2 pN0 situations is still being debated. This study was designed to clarify whether or not routine radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy reduces the risk of local recurrence and if it influences the overall survival rate. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with mastectomy for pT1-T2 pN0 tumors and no systemic treatment. Patients treated with radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy (Group A) are compared with those treated with mastectomy alone (Group B). RESULTS: A total of 918 patients underwent mastectomy. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy (n = 114) had a significantly lower risk for local recurrence. Ten years after the primary diagnosis, 98.1% of the patients with radiotherapy were disease free compared to 86.4% of the patients without radiotherapy. The average time interval from primary diagnosis until local recurrence was 8.9 years in Group A and 2.8 years in Group B. The Cox regression analysis including radiotherapy, tumor size and tumor grading found the highest risk for local recurrence for patients without radiotherapy (p < 0.0004). In terms of overall survival however, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.8787) and the Cox regression analysis failed to show any impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION: With observation spanning over 35 years, this study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy reduces the risk for local recurrence in node-negative patients with pT1-T2 tumors but has no impact on the overall survival rate.