Safety and efficacy of the multidrug-resistance inhibitor biricodar (VX-710) with concurrent doxorubicin in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Incel (biricodar, VX-710) restores drug sensitivity to P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-1-expressing cells. This Phase I/II study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of VX-710 plus doxorubicin in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic, anthracycline-resistant/refractory, soft tissue sarcoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In Phase I, i.v. bolus doxorubicin at 60, 75, or 67.5 mg/m(2) was administered 8 h after initiation of a 72-h continuous i.v. (CIV) infusion of VX-710 (120 mg/m(2)/h) to cohorts of patients to establish a maximum tolerated dose. For efficacy evaluations in Phase II, eligible patients had inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic, anthracycline-resistant/refractory soft tissue sarcoma; < or =225 mg/m(2) cumulative prior doxorubicin; and adequate hematological, liver, and kidney function. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled in Phase I. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity with 75 and then 67.5 mg/m(2) doxorubicin, and the maximum tolerated dose was established at 60 mg/m(2) with VX-710, 120 mg/m(2)/h, 72-h CIV. VX-710 had no apparent effect on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. Twenty-nine patients enrolled in Phase II were treated with VX-710, 120 mg/m(2)/h 72-h CIV, and 60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin. Among 26 evaluable patients, minimal activity was noted among 11 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, in 15 patients with anthracycline-resistant sarcomas of other histologies, 2 achieved partial responses and 7 patients had disease stabilization with an overall median progression-free interval of 3.4 months. CONCLUSION: Anthracycline resistance in GISTs appears to be independent of P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance-associated protein-1 resistance mechanisms. However, the combination of VX-710 and doxorubicin resulted in objective responses or disease stabilization in patients with strictly defined anthracycline-refractory non-GIST sarcomas, which warrants further evaluation.     

Safety and efficacy of the MDR inhibitor Incel (biricodar,VX-710) in combination with mitoxantrone and prednisone in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE: VX-710 (biricodar, Incel) restores drug sensitivity to cells expressing P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1). MRP1 is expressed in a high proportion of prostate tumors while P-gp expression is variable. Since mitoxantrone (M) and prednisone (P) are substrates for MDR transporters, we initiated a study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of VX-710 plus M/P in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive HRPC (defined as new lesions, new disease-related pain, or 50% increase in PSA within 6 weeks of entry), testosterone <30 ng/ml, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status of 0-3, and adequate organ function. Patients received VX-710 (120 mg/m(2) per h) as a 72-h continuous intravenous infusion with intravenous bolus mitoxantrone (12 mg/m(2)) administered 4 h after VX-710 was started and prednisone (5 mg twice daily) administered throughout the study treatment. Endpoints included serum PSA response, PSA response duration, time to PSA progression, pain reduction, and quality of life measures. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 40 patients and 184 courses of VX-710 plus M/P were administered. Intensive pharmacokinetics, which were performed on six patients who received one cycle of M/P alone, followed by VX-710 plus M/P for all other cycles, showed that VX-710 did not alter mitoxantrone clearance. VX-710 blood concentration at the time of mitoxantrone administration averaged 4.52 microg/ml. VX-710 plus M/P was well tolerated. Transient nausea/vomiting and mild neutropenia were the principal treatment toxicities. Five patients experienced an uncomplicated febrile neutropenic episode (12%), three had severe nausea/vomiting, and two experienced transient moderate to severe ataxia. Of the 40 patients, 12 (30%, 95% confidence interval 16-44%) had a reduction in PSA of >/=50% and 9 of the 12 patients (23% overall, 95% CI 10-35%) achieved a reduction in PSA of >/=80% that was sustained for the duration of treatment with M/P plus VX-710. The median time to PSA progression was 41 weeks (95% CI 34-68 weeks). Of the 40 patients, 15 completed treatment with stable disease and 13 had progressive disease with increasing serum PSA during study treatment. Median survival was 48 weeks for the intent-to-treat population of 40 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of VX-710 to M/P therapy did not appear to increase the proportion of patients with significant serum PSA reductions compared to M/P alone. However, the duration of PSA response observed for the 12 PSA responders suggests that MDR inhibition may benefit some patients with HRPC. In addition to MRP1 or P-gp expression, other mechanisms of drug resistance are probably associated with the relative insensitivity of HRPC to cytotoxic therapy.     

Safety and efficacy of the multidrug resistance inhibitor Incel (biricodar; VX-710) in combination with paclitaxel for advanced breast cancer refractory to paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: VX-710 (biricodar, Incel) restores drug sensitivity to P-glycoprotein (MDR1) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1)-expressing cells. This Phase II study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of VX-710 plus paclitaxel in women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who were refractory to prior paclitaxel therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients had paclitaxel-refractory disease defined as progressive disease after a minimum of two cycles of paclitaxel (weekly or 3-week schedule) or relapsed/progressive disease within 6 months of prior paclitaxel therapy. Patients received 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel over 3 h starting 4 h after initiation of a 24-h continuous i.v. infusion of 120 mg/m(2)/h VX-710. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received study treatment and 35 were evaluable for response. VX-710 + paclitaxel therapy was generally well tolerated. Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity, with a median nadir ANC cycle 1 of 0.76 x 10(9) cells/liter and a 40% overall incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia. Nonhematological side effects (asthenia, paresthesia, headache, myalgia, nausea, and diarrhea) were generally mild to moderate and reversible. Paclitaxel AUC (16.8 +/- 5.0 microg x h/ml) and clearance (5.1 +/- 1.3 liters/h/m(2)) during the first treatment cycle were comparable with standard 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel administered in a 3-h schedule. Four patients achieved partial responses (three of the four had progressive disease on prior paclitaxel) with a mean response duration of 5.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 11.4% (4 of 35) objective response rate observed in this study suggests that VX-710 can resensitize a subgroup of paclitaxel-refractory patients to paclitaxel. The safety and pharmacokinetics of the VX-710/pacitaxel regimen support further evaluation in breast cancer patients with initial paclitaxel therapy to prevent emergence of the MDR phenotype in recurrent disease.     

A phase II study of the safety and efficacy of the multidrug resistance inhibitor VX-710 combined with doxorubicin and vincristine in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Tumors with multidrug resistance (MDR) frequently up-regulate efflux proteins, including MDR-associated protein (MRP-1) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). MDR represents an obstacle to successful chemotherapy treatment and is reversible in Pgp- or MRP-1-expressing cells by the inhibitor VX-710. A Phase II study was designed to evaluate VX-710 in combination with doxorubicin and vincristine in patients with sensitive, recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Eligible patients had recurrent SCLC after a response to first-line chemotherapy. Stage 1 safety evaluation was completed with planned expansion if 9 responses were confirmed in the first 35 patients. Patients were treated every 21 days until progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled from 1998 to 2000. Neutropenia was the major toxicity, occurring in 26 of 36 patients (72%). Neutropenia was more severe (30% vs 20% grade 4) and developed earlier (58% vs 38% in Cycle 1) among the 15 patients who were enrolled prior to an amendment that required neutropenia prophylaxis. Four patients died on study: 2 from infections likely related to therapy and 2 from cancer progression. Seven of 36 patients (19%) had partial responses; 6 patients sustained responses through 6 cycles of treatment, with 1 response lasting 3 years. Three additional patients had unconfirmed responses, and 4 patients had stable disease. The median survival was 6 months. No correlative (99m)Tc-sestamibi uptake in tumor tissue was observed with the addition of VX-710 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of VX-710 to doxorubicin and vincristine therapy did not significantly enhance antitumor activity or survival. Although there were durable responses, criteria were not met to proceed with Stage 2 expansion.     

A clinical-pharmacological evaluation of percutaneous isolated hepatic infusion of doxorubicin in patients with unresectable liver tumors

A dose escalation study of hepatic arterial infusion of doxorubicin during hemodynamic isolation of the liver (the Delcath system) was conducted to: 1) study the pharmacokinetics of regional doxorubicin therapy, and 2) define therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of unresectable liver tumors. Eighteen patients with unresectable primary or metastatic tumor in the liver were treated with 57 procedures. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on all treatments. Hepatic extraction ratio of doxorubicin remained constant at 60.3+/-12.1%. independent of the dose escalation. The calculated intrahepatic concentration of doxorubicin ranged from 30 to 88 microg/ml when the dosage of doxorubicin was escalated from 50 to 120 mg/m2. Dose-limiting systemic toxicity (grade 4 myelosuppression) was observed at 120 mg/m2. Twelve of 14 patients who received more than one treatment at 90 or 120 mg/m2 were evaluable for disease response: there were 4 partial responses, 3 minor responses, I stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median overall survival of responders was 23 months, and for nonresponders it was 8 months. We have demonstrated a dose-response effect of hepatic infusion of doxorubicin at 90 and 120 mg/m2 in advanced hepatic malignancies. The isolated hepatic perfusion system improves the therapeutic index of doxorubicin and provides pharmacologic justification for its use in the treatment of unresectable hepatic malignancies, especially metastatic melanoma and sarcoma.     

Dose escalation and pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in children with solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of Doxil in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. Doxil is pegylated doxorubicin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients were children with refractory tumors who had received cumulative anthracycline doses <300 mg/m(2). Cohorts of at least three patients each received escalating doses of Doxil starting at 40 mg/m(2) at 4-week intervals. If no dose-limiting toxicity occurred, dosages were escalated by increments of 10 mg/m(2) in subsequent cohorts. Originally, Doxil was administered over 60 min, but significant infusion reactions prompted longer infusion times of 4 h. Patients also received premedication with dexamethasone, ranitidine, and diphenhydramine 24 h before infusion, with ranitidine continued 24 h after infusion. Periodic blood samples were collected and plasma doxorubicin concentrations were quantified to characterize the pharmacokinetics of Doxil. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and June 2000, 22 children ages 4-21 years with refractory tumors were treated with Doxil. Most patients had received one to five prior chemotherapy regimens, and all but five had prior radiotherapy (two had no prior therapy). Doxil was escalated to a dosage of 70 mg/m(2). At that level, dose-limiting mucositis was seen during the first cycle in two of six patients, thus defining dose-limiting toxicity, and in one additional patient during a subsequent cycle. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting less than 7 days was documented in two of six patients. The dose-limiting toxicity among two of six patients at 70 mg/m(2) was grade 3 mucositis during the first cycle of therapy. Painful desquamating dermatitis of the hands and feet, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, occurred in six patients. In two of those patients, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia started as grade 1 and progressed to grade 2 during subsequent courses. Mean estimates of central volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were 1.45 liters/m(2), 0.03 liter/h/m(2), and 36.4 h, respectively. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dose of Doxil administered every 4 weeks to pediatric patients was 60 mg/m(2). The effect of Doxil on pediatric patients with malignancies remains to be determined and should be studied in pediatric Phase II trials.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of continuous twice weekly intravenous administration of Cilengitide (EMD 121974), a novel inhibitor of the integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 in patients with advanced solid tumours

A single-agent dose escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study with Cilengitide, an inhibitor of the integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5, was performed to determine its safety and toxicity. Cilengitide was administered as a one-hour infusion twice weekly without interruption to patients with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed metastatic solid tumours. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined at days 1 and 15. 37 patients were enrolled into the study. Dose levels studied were 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 400, 600, 850, 1200, and 1600 mg/m(2)/infusion. There was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Pharmacokinetics were dose-independent and time-invariant. Apparent terminal half-life ranged from 3 to 5 h. At 120 mg/m(2)/infusion, peak plasma concentrations were attained that optimally inhibited tumour growth in preclinical models. Cilengitide can be safely administered using a continuous twice-weekly infusion regimen. As DLT was not reached, future trials should explore Cilengitide at different doses.     

Prolonged chlorpromazine infusion as antiemetic in patients on daily cisplatin infusion. A pilot study

Continuous chlorpromazine infusion 120 mg/m2/24 h was administered for a period of 84-110 h to 24 consecutive patients with various advanced solid malignancies receiving concomitantly a 3-day infusion of cisplatin. The latter was given at a dose of 40 mg/m2/day over 6 h every day, in combination with either doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or 5-fluorouracil infusion or vinblastine and bleomycin. This novel approach of using prolonged continuous chlorpromazine infusion as antiemetic therapy proved quite safe with no incidence of extrapyramidal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, or agranulocytosis. Only one episode of convulsions occurred, promptly reversed. Also, antiemesis was demonstrated in 66% of patients receiving such highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Blood levels of chlorpromazine did not correlate with antiemetic efficacy.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a hexacyclic camptothecin, on a daily-times-five schedule in patients with advanced leukemia.

PURPOSE: DX-8951f is a novel hexacyclic camptothecin-analogue topoisomerase I inhibitor with both in vitro antileukemic activity and myelosuppression as a dose-limiting toxicity in solid tumor Phase I studies. DX-8951f is active in a human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) severe combined immunodeficient mouse model. In a leukemia Phase I study, we investigated the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of DX-8951f in patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML or acute lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: DX-8951f was given as an i.v. infusion over 30 min daily for 5 or 7 days. The starting dose was 0.6 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days (3.0 mg/m(2)/course). Courses were given every 3-4 weeks according to toxicity and antileukemic efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (AML, 21 patients; myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 patient; acute lymphocytic leukemia, 2 patients; CML-BP, 1 patient) were treated. Stomatitis was the dose-limiting toxicity, occurring in two of two patients treated at 1.35 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, two of three treated at 1.2 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, and one of six treated at 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 7 days. The recommended Phase II dose was 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. The pharmacokinetics of DX-8951 was linear and well fit by a two-compartment model. CONCLUSIONS: Phase II studies are warranted to further define the activity of DX-8951f in patients with hematological malignancies.     

A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of squalamine, an aminosterol angiogenesis inhibitor.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and characterize the pharmacokinetics of squalamine administered as a continuous i.v. infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of squalamine as a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Doses were initially escalated in 100% increments from a starting dose of 6 mg/m(2)/day, with a single patient treated at each dose level until moderate toxicity was observed, at which time additional patients were treated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were treated with 73 courses of squalamine at 13 dose levels ranging from 6 to 700 mg/m(2)/day. Hepatotoxicity, characterized by brief, asymptomatic elevations in transaminases and hyperbilirubinemia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of squalamine. At 700 mg/m(2)/day, two of three patients developed grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia, which precluded further dose escalation. At 500 mg/m(2)/day, one of seven patients experienced dose-limiting grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia and grade 3 neurosensory changes, which resolved soon after treatment. Squalamine pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional. At 500 mg/m(2)/day, the mean (percentage coefficient of variation) clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution of squalamine were 2.67 liters/h/m(2) (85%), 9.46 h (81%), and 36.84 liters/m(2) (124%), respectively, and steady-state concentrations [20.08 micro g/ml (13%)] were well above those that inhibit angiogenesis in preclinical models. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose of 500 mg/m(2)/day, squalamine is well tolerated and results in plasma concentrations at least an order of magnitude higher than those required for prominent antiangiogenic effects in preclinical studies.     

A prolonged methoxymorpholino doxorubicin (PNU-152243 or MMRDX) infusion schedule in patients with solid tumours: a phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study

The aim of this phase I study was to assess feasibility, pharmacokinetics and toxicity of methoxymorpholino doxorubicin (MMRDX or PNU-152243) administered as a 3 h intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks. Fourteen patients with intrinsically anthracycline-resistant tumours received 37 cycles of MMRDX. The first cohort of patients was treated with 1 mg m(-2) of MMRDX. The next cohorts received 1.25 mg m(-2) and 1.5 mg m(-2) respectively. Common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade III/IV nausea and vomiting were observed in 1/18 cycles at 1.25 mg m(-2) and in 2/11 cycles at 1.5 mg m(-2). Transient elevation in transaminases up to CTC grade III was observed in 2/16 cycles at 1.25 mg m(-2) and 4/11 cycles at 1.5 mg m(-2). No cardiotoxicity was observed. At 1.25 mg m(-2) CTC grade IV neutropenia occurred in 1/17 cycles. At 1.5 mg m(-2) CTC grade III neutropenia was seen in 2/7 and grade IV in 3/7 evaluable cycles. Thrombocytopenia grade III was observed in 2/9 and grade IV in 1/9 evaluable cycles. One patient treated at 1.5 mg m(-2) died with neutropenic fever. Therefore, dose-limiting toxicity was reached and 1.25 mg m(-2) was considered the maximum tolerated dose for MMRDX as 3 h infusion. No tumour responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed a rapid clearance of MMRDX from the circulation by an extensive tissue distribution. Renal excretion of the drug and its metabolite was negligible. In conclusion, prolongation of MMRDX infusion to 3 h does not improve the toxicity profile as compared with bolus administration.     

A phase I trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and valspodar (PSC 833), a modulator of multidrug resistance.

PURPOSE: P-glycoprotein is an efflux pump for many drugs including doxorubicin and paclitaxel. This study evaluated the coadministration of these drugs with the P-glycoprotein inhibitor valspodar (PSC 833) with the aim of determining: (a) maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel (DP); (b) the MTD of DP combined with PSC 833 (DPV), without and with filgrastim (G-CSF); and (c) the pharmacokinetic interactions of PSC 833 with doxorubicin and paclitaxel. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: For the first cycle, patients received doxorubicin as a 15-min infusion followed by paclitaxel as a 1-h infusion. For the second cycle, patients received reduced doses of DP with PSC 833 at 5 mg/kg p.o., four times a day for 12 doses. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with various refractory malignancies were enrolled and assessable. The MTD of DP without PSC 833 was 35 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 150 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The MTD of DPV without G-CSF was 12.5 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 70 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicity for both DP and DPV was neutropenia without thrombocytopenia. With G-CSF, the MTD for DPV was 20 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. No grade 4 nonhematological toxicities were observed. Five partial and two minor tumor remissions were observed. Paired pharmacokinetics with and without PSC 833 revealed substantial drug interactions with both doxorubicin and paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: PSC 833 can be administered safely with doxorubicin and paclitaxel. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs are significantly affected by PSC 833, requiring approximately 60% dose reductions for equivalent degrees of myelosuppression.     

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of continuous weekly-administered paclitaxel and BMS-214662, a novel farnesyl transferase inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated every week as tolerated with i.v. paclitaxel (fixed dose, 80 mg/m(2)/wk) administered over 1 h followed by i.v. BMS-214662 (escalating doses, 80-245 mg/m(2)/wk) over 1 h starting 30 min after completion of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 94 courses (one course, 21 days) of study treatment. Two patients received five courses of BMS-214662 as a weekly 24-h infusion (209 mg/m(2)/wk). The most common toxicities were grade 1 to 2 nausea/vomiting and/or diarrhea. DLTs observed at or near the MTD (200 mg/m(2)/wk) were grade 4 febrile neutropenia with sepsis occurring on day 2 of course 1 (245 mg/m(2)/wk), reversible grade 3 to 4 serum transaminase increases on day 2, and grade 3 diarrhea (200 and 245 mg/m(2)/wk). Objective partial responses were observed in patients with pretreated head and neck, ovarian, and hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas, and leiomyosarcoma. The observed pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and BMS-214662 imply no interaction between the two. Significant inhibition (>80%) of farnesyl transferase activity in peripheral mononuclear cells was observed at the end of BMS-214662 infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreated patients with advanced malignancies can tolerate weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 at doses that achieve objective clinical benefit. Due to multiple DLTs occurring at the expanded MTD, the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule is paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and BMS-214662 (160 mg/m(2) over 1 h) administered weekly.     

Phase I study of cinchonine, a multidrug resistance reversing agent, combined with the CHVP regimen in relapsed and refractory lymphoproliferative syndromes.

Overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in cancer cells reduces intracellular accumulation of various anticancer drugs including anthracyclines and vinca alkaloids. This multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype can be reversed in vitro by a number of non-cytotoxic drugs. We have identified the quinine's isomer cinchonine as a potent MDR reversing agent, both in vitro and in animal models. Here, we report an open phase I dose escalation trial in patients with refractory or relapsed malignant lymphoid diseases. Cinchonine dihydrochloride was administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 48 h and escalated over five dose levels ranging from 15 to 35 mg/kg/d. Cinchonine infusion started 24 h before i.v. doxorubicin (25 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/d) (CHVP regimen) and lasted for 24 h after chemotherapy infusion. Thirty-four patients received 87 cycles of CHVP/cinchonine. The MTD of cinchonine administered by continuous i.v. infusion was 30 mg/kg/d. Prolonged cardiac repolarization was the main dose-limiting toxicity. No ventricular arrhythmia including 'torsade de pointes' was observed. An MDR reversing activity was identified in the serum from every patient and correlated with cinchonine serum level. When infused at 30 mg/kg/d, cinchonine demonstrated a limited influence on doxorubicin pharmacokinetic. We conclude that i.v. infusion of cinchonine might be started 12 h before MDR-related chemotherapy infusion and requires continuous cardiac monitoring but no reduction of cytotoxic drug doses.     

Phase II study of tariquidar, a selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor, in patients with chemotherapy-resistant, advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether addition of the selective P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor tariquidar (XR9576) to chemotherapy could induce an objective tumor response in patients who previously were resistant to the same agents. The secondary objectives were to evaluate P-gp expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), to determine functional activity of the P-gp transporter before and after administration of tariquidar with serial technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-sestamibi scans, and to correlate those parameters with clinical response. METHODS: Seventeen women with Stage III-IV breast carcinoma were included in the study who progressed (n = 13 women) or had stable disease (n = 4 women) on doxorubicin-containing or taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens. During the study, the same chemotherapy was continued without dose modifications, but tariquidar (150 mg intravenously) was added to the treatment regimen. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of patients had P-gp-positive tumors by IHC, and 5 patients (29%) experienced increases > or = 10% in sestamibi uptake (median increase, 40%; range, 10-63%) after the administration of tariquidar. There was one partial response in a patient who had the greatest increase in sestamibi uptake and who also showed inducible P-gp expression. There was one patient who experienced severe doxorubicin/docetaxel-related toxicity after tariquidar was added to her chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Tariquidar showed limited clinical activity to restore sensitivity to anthracycline or taxane chemotherapy. Functional imaging of the tumor with (99m)Tc-sestamibi scans before and after administration of multidrug-resistance inhibitor may be useful to identify the small subset of patients who could benefit from multidrug-resistance modulation in future trials.     

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and the multidrug-resistance modulator, valspodar

Valspodar, a P-glycoprotein modulator, affects pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin when administered in combination, resulting in doxorubicin dose reduction. In animal models, valspodar has minimal interaction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD). To determine any pharmacokinetic interaction in humans, we designed a study to determine maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of total doxorubicin, in PEG-LD and valspodar combination therapy in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients received PEG-LD 20-25 mg m(-2) intravenously over 1 h for cycle one. In subsequent 2-week cycles, valspodar was administered as 72 h continuous intravenous infusion with PEG-LD beginning at 8 mg m(-2) and escalated in an accelerated titration design to 25 mg m(-2). Pharmacokinetic data were collected with and without valspodar. A total of 14 patients completed at least two cycles of therapy. No DLTs were observed in six patients treated at the highest level of PEG-LD 25 mg m(-2). The most common toxicities were fatigue, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhoea, and ataxia. Partial responses were observed in patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma. The mean (range) total doxorubicin clearance decreased from 27 (10-73) ml h(-1) m(-2) in cycle 1 to 18 (3-37) ml h(-1) m(-2) with the addition of valspodar in cycle 2 (P=0.009). Treatment with PEG-LD 25 mg m(-2) in combination with valspodar results in a moderate prolongation of total doxorubicin clearance and half-life but did not increase the toxicity of this agent.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of squalamine, a novel antiangiogenic agent, in patients with advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: A Phase I study of squalamine, a novel antiangiogenic agent originally isolated from the dogfish shark Squalus acanthias, was conducted in patients with advanced cancers to: (a) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of squalamine lactate when given as a 120-h continuous i.v. infusion every two weeks; and (b) to obtain information on prolonged (>120-h) continuous i.v. infusions in patients who have tolerated 120-h infusions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A rapid dose escalation scheme was used that permitted intrapatient dose escalation. Three or more patients were treated at each dose, of which at least one patient started treatment de novo at that dose. Once DLT was encountered, the dose was decreased by one dose level, and the duration of infusion was prolonged from 10 up to 30 days in 5-day increments. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated at eight squalamine dose levels; the number of patients/dose level who received 120-h infusions were [expressed as dose in mg/m(2)/day (number of patients initiated de novo at that dose/total number of patients treated at that dose)]: 6 (3/3), 12 (3/6), 24 (1/5), 48 (2/6), 96 (4/10), 192 (2/6), 384 (3/8), and 538 (1/5). DLT was encountered at 384 mg/m(2)/day (1/3 de novo patients, 5/8 total patients) and 538 mg/m(2)/day (1/1 de novo patients, 4/5 total patients) and consisted of hepatotoxicity, characterized by grade 3 transaminase elevations that resolved 3-11 days after ceasing squalamine infusion. Three patients did not experience hepatotoxicity when first treated at 384 mg/m(2)/day but developed DLT at the same dose when de-escalated from 538 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included grade 1-3 fatigue, grade 1-2 nausea, anorexia, and neuromuscular symptoms. The maximum duration of continuous i.v. infusion was 20 days at a dose rate of 192 mg/m(2)/day in one patient without adverse effects. Pharmacokinetic calculations revealed a linear relationship between area under the curve or Cmax and squalamine dose rate up to 384 mg/m(2)/day, with a prolonged terminal squalamine persistence in patient plasma (median t(1/2) = 18 h; range, 8-48 h). Transient tumor responses were observed in a patient with synovial cell sarcoma and a patient with breast carcinoma with cutaneous metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The best tolerated dose rate of squalamine when administered as a 120-h continuous i.v. infusion was 192 mg/m(2)/day; however, patients without prior exposure to squalamine appeared to tolerate a dose rate of 384 mg/m(2)/day without DLT. On the basis of preclinical evidence of synergy with cytotoxic agents and demonstration of human safety from this trial, additional clinical trials have been initiated with squalamine in combination with chemotherapy for patients with late stage lung cancer and ovarian cancer.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of weekly and every-three-weeks docetaxel.

PURPOSE: Weekly administration of docetaxel has demonstrated comparable efficacy together with a distinct toxicity profile with reduced myelosuppression, although pharmacokinetic data with weekly regimens are lacking. The comparative pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during weekly and once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) administration schedules were evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-six patients received weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) as a 30-min infusion alone (n = 8) or in combination with irinotecan (n = 12), or in 3-weekly regimens, as a 1-h infusion at 60 mg/m(2) with doxorubicin (n = 10), 75 mg/m(2) alone (n = 9), or 100 mg/m(2) alone (n = 7). Serial blood samples were obtained immediately before and up to 21 days after the infusion. Plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed by compartmental modeling. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD docetaxel clearance values were similar with weekly and 3-weekly schedules (25.2 +/- 7.7 versus 23.7 +/- 7.9 liter/h/m(2)); half-lives were also similar with both schedules of administration (16.5 +/- 11.2 versus 17.6 +/- 7.4 h). With extended plasma sampling beyond 24 h post-infusion, docetaxel clearance was 18% lower and the terminal half-life was 5-fold longer. At 35 mg/m(2), the mean +/- SD docetaxel concentration on day 8 was 0.00088 +/- 0.00041 microg/ml (1.08 +/- 0.51 nM) at 75 mg/m(2), concentrations on day 8, 15, and 22 were 0.0014 +/- 0.00043 microg/ml (1.79 +/- 0.53 nM), 0.00067 +/- 0.00025 microg/ml (0.83 +/- 0.31 nM), and 0.00047 +/- 0.00008 microg/ml (0.58 +/- 0.099 nM), respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel pharmacokinetics are similar for the weekly and 3-weekly regimens. Prolonged circulation of low nanomolar concentrations of docetaxel may contribute to the mechanism of action of docetaxel through suppression of microtubule dynamics and tumor angiogenesis and enhanced cell radiosensitivity in combined modality therapy.     

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of two schedules of high dose epirubicin

Epirubicin, a stereoisomer of doxorubicin, is reported to have equal antitumor activity with lower cardiac and systemic toxicity. Recently the maximum tolerated dose of this drug has been revised upwards with reported increased response rates. However, the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin at high doses have never been reported. Accordingly, this study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin when administered as either a 15-min i.v. bolus or a 6-h i.v. infusion in a phase I study at high doses. Nineteen patients with a variety of malignancies were given a total of 52 cycles of epirubicin at doses of 90 to 150 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was 150 mg/m2 epirubicin given either as a bolus or as an infusion. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Interpatient variation occurred in the pharmacokinetics at each dose level but overall there were dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. This was manifested as a disproportionate increase in plasma levels and areas under the curve as the epirubicin dose was increased from 90 to 150 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of epirubicin could best be described by an open two-compartment model. Peak plasma concentrations were attained at a median of 12 min following the bolus injection and concentrations approached the steady state within a median of 55 min following the start of the 6-h infusion. Administration of the 150 mg/m2 dose over the 6 h compared to the bolus administration was associated with a 92% decrease in peak concentration from 3088 +/- 1503 to 234 +/- 126 ng/ml. This was not associated with an appreciable change in hematological or nonhematological toxicities. The median distribution half-life was 10 min and the median elimination half-life was 42.0 h. The cumulative renal excretion of the parent compound accounted for less than 2% of the administered dose. The major metabolites in both plasma and urine samples were 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-4'-epidoxorubicin, 13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin, and 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin. This study demonstrates that a 135 mg/m2 bolus infusion given on a 3-weekly schedule is an appropriate initial dose for further clinical studies.     

Disposition of docetaxel in the presence of P-glycoprotein inhibition by intravenous administration of R101933

Recently, a study of docetaxel in combination with the new orally administered P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor R101933 showed that this combination was feasible. However, due to the low oral bioavailability of R101933 and high interpatient variability, no further attempts to increase the level of P-gp inhibition were made. Here, we assessed the feasibility of combining docetaxel with intravenously (i.v.) administered R101933, and determined the disposition of docetaxel with and without the P-gp inhibitor. Patients received i.v. R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 250 to 500 mg on day 1 (cycle 0), docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion on day 8 (cycle 1) and the combination every 3 weeks thereafter (cycle 2 and further cycles). 12 patients were entered into the study, of whom 9 received the combination treatment. Single treatment with i.v. R101933 was associated with minimal toxicity consisting of temporary drowsiness and somnolence. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of neutropenic fever was seen in cycles 1 and 2 or in further cycles at both dose levels. The plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not changed by the R101933 regimen at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 22.5+/-6.2 l/h/m(2) and 24.2+/-7.4 l/h/m(2) (P=0.38) in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. However, the faecal excretion of unchanged docetaxel decreased significantly after the combination treatment from 2.5+/-2.1% to less than 1% of the administered dose of docetaxel, most likely due to inhibition of the intestinal P-gp by R101933. Plasma concentrations of R101933 were not different in cycles 0 or 2 and the concentrations achieved in the first 12-h period after i.v. infusion were capable of inhibiting P-gp in an ex vivo assay. We conclude that the combination of 100 mg/m(2) i.v. docetaxel and 500 mg i.v. R101933 is feasible, lacks pharmacokinetic interaction in plasma, and shows evidence of P-gp inhibition both in an ex vivo assay and in vivo as indicated by the inhibition of intestinal P-gp.