Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: single center experience

AIMS: The aim of this study was a retrospective assessment of the safety of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) and the outcome of these renal transplantations. METHODS: From November 2001 to October 2006, we performed 30 LLDN (all left nephrectomies) after excluding any renal vascular anomalies in the donor. All laparoscopic procedures were performed by a team consisting of an expert laparoscopic surgeon and a transplant surgeon. The donor mean age was 48.9 +/- 7.6 years (range 22 to 69), 33% of the donors were men and their mean Body Mass Index was 24.7 +/- 3.8 kg/m(2). The recipients were a 32 +/- 14 years old (range 6 to 64), with 66% of them men, and their mean time on dialysis, 33 +/- 49 months (range 0 to 120). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 14 months, all donors and recipients are alive. The mean operative time was 272 +/- 41 min (range 225-360) and the mean warm ischemia time, 161 +/- 35 seconds (range 107 to 240). Surgical complications in the donors were one incisional hernia and two cases of pneumonia. The donor's mean hospital stay was 5.3 +/- 1.7 days (range 3 to 12) and their mean serum creatinine at discharge was 111 +/- 21 micromol/L. There was one surgical complication-a hematoma-among the recipients, and all transplants functioned immediately except for one case. CONCLUSIONS: LLDN was confirmed to be safe and effective, with no negative impact on transplants success. Expertise in laparoscopic surgery is needed to minimize the side effects for the transplant donor and for the recipient.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy offers numerous advantages when compared with the traditional open approach. For the donor, it has resulted in a shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative analgesic requirements, earlier return to activities of daily living and employment, and decreased financial loss owing to absence from the workforce. For the recipient, the procedure does not adversely impact on allograft function, graft survival, or patient survival.     

腹腔镜活体供肾摘除术

腹腔镜活体供肾摘除术是近几年才在我国许多肾移植中心起步开展的微创取肾手术,该术式有效地增加了活体供肾来源,促进了现阶段我国活体供肾肾脏移植的开展.本文就腹腔镜活体供肾摘除术在国内外的发展现状进行综述.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND: The demand for renal transplants is greater than the available kidneys. Live donation is one way of increasing the supply. Laparoscopic removal of the donor kidney appears to reduce morbidity for the donors. Some who are hesitant because of the morbidity associated with open nephrectomy are willing to consider the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. METHODS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was offered to all but three donors since the commencement of the programme in 1997. Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively for the first 120 donors. Venous and arterial anatomy was assessed preoperatively by computed tomographic angiography. RESULTS: All but four donor procedures were completed laparoscopically. Three of these were for bleeding that could not be safely controlled laparoscopically and the fourth was a planned conversion to deal with the renal vessels, in the first right nephrectomy. Two kidneys were lost due to arterial thrombosis and two underwent segmental infarction after the loss of one of two or three separately anastomosed vessels. Three recipients had delayed function and two of them required dialysis postoperatively. Other minor complications occurred but were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is safe for the donor and the transplant kidney. It offers the advantage of decreased morbidity for the donor, with a shorter hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity and, for some, early return to work.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Live donor renal transplantation has many advantages including greater graft and patient survival, shorter waiting periods, improved human leukocyte antigen matching, and less cold ischemia. Until recently, disincentives from the operation, such as prolonged hospitalization, postoperative pain, and significant convalescence, have deterred live donor renal transplantation. This article describes the technique of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy and briefly reports the results. The procedure has resulted in improved postoperative recovery and shorter convalescence, with no effect on recipient renal function.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the recipient

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy offers advantages to the donor in terms of decreased pain and shorter recuperation. Heretofore no detailed analysis of the recipient of laparoscopically procured kidneys has been performed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had any deleterious effect on the recipient. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all live donor renal transplantations performed from January 1995 through April 1998. The control group received kidneys procured via a standard flank approach (Open). Rejection was diagnosed histologically. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients received kidneys from laparoscopic (Lap) and 48 from open donors. One-year recipient (100% vs. 97.0%) and graft (93.5% vs. 91.1%) survival rates were similar for the Open and Lap groups, respectively. A similar incidence of vascular thrombosis (3.4% vs. 2.1%, P=NS) and ureteral complications (9.1% vs. 6.3%, P=NS) were seen in the Lap and Open groups, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection for the first month was 30.1% for the Lap group and 31.9% for the Open group (P=NS). The rate of decline of serum creatinine level in the early posttransplantation period was initially greater in the Open group, but by postoperative day 4 no significant difference existed. No difference was observed in allograft function long-term. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy does not adversely effect recipient outcome. The previously demonstrated benefits to the donor, and the increased willingness of individuals to undergo live kidney donation, coupled with the acceptable outcomes experienced by recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys justifies the continued development and adoption of this operation.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience

PURPOSE: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. RESULTS: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 31/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 21/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.     

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: single-center experience

Objective

Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has become the standard procedure for renal transplantation. This technique is considered less invasive for the donor, allowing lower postoperative analgesic requirements and a faster return to daily activities. In Japan, 1123 renal transplantation were performed in 2009. And, almost 83% were living related procedures. The aim of this study was a retrospective assessment of the safety and outcomes of LLDN on renal transplantations.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative data and surgical complications for 21 patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy between June 2009 and March 2011.

Results

LLDN was successfully completed in all patients, without conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time was 243.5 ± 46.0 minutes with an average blood loss of 46.0 ± 46.1 mL. Warm ischemic time was 2.1 ± 0.62 minutes. Hospital stay was 11.1 ± 2.7 days. There were no major donor complications. One patient presented a wound infection responding to conservative treatment.

Conclusions

LLDN is a safe effective procedure. The vascular stapler is useful to manage the renal vessels.     

Laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Renal grafts from living donors represent an important source of organs, particularly for young patients with chronic renal failure. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a relatively new technique, which has the potential to increase the pool of available kidney grafts by removing some disincentives to live donation. The technique used for left kidney donation at our center, the first to introduce laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in Italy, is described in this report. To further reduce warm ischemia time, the kidney is preloaded inside the extraction bag and 2 staplers are used to transect the renal artery and vein. The spread of the new technique in our country and in the rest of Europe is likely to raise the issue of training in laparoscopic surgery for transplant surgeons.