Preventive effects of inhaled formoterol and salbutamol on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction--a placebo-controlled study.

The preventive effects of inhaled formoterol (a new beta 2-agonist) and salbutamol aerosols on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction were studied in 12 patients with mild or moderate asthma in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Three hours after the administration of 12 micrograms formoterol, 200 micrograms salbutamol (doses with equal bronchodilator effects) or placebo via aerosol, histamine challenge was undertaken, using a dosimetric jet nebulizer with controlled tidal breathing. The noncumulative dose of histamine diphosphate aerosol provoking a 15% fall in FEV1 (PD15) was calculated. The PD15 after inhalation of 12 micrograms formoterol was significantly higher than that after 200 micrograms salbutamol (median values 640 and 310 micrograms, respectively; p < 0.01). For both treatments, the PD15 was significantly higher than that after placebo (median 185 micrograms). The results indicate that the preventive effect against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction at 3 h after drug is significantly better with formoterol than with salbutamol when using inhaled doses with an equal acute bronchodilator effect.     

Long duration of airway but not systemic effects of inhaled formoterol in asthmatic patients

RATIONALE: Formoterol is approved as asthma rescue medication in many countries. The exact duration of the airway vs. systemic effects of formoterol compared with another rescue medication, salbutamol, has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the duration of airway bronchodilatory effects vs. systemic effects of inhaled formoterol and salbutamol in asthmatic patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with stable and reversible asthma were given single doses of formoterol dry-powder inhaler (OxisTurbuhaler) 2x9 microg (lower dose; LD) and 6x9 microg (higher dose; HD), salbutamol (VentolinDiskhaler) 3x400 microg (LD) and 9x400 microg (HD), and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Airway and systemic effects were assessed by forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), serum potassium, blood pressure, corrected QT-interval (QTc), and palpitation and tremor scores. Time with clinically relevant bronchodilation (FEV1 increase 12%) without clinically relevant markers of systemic effects (serum potassium suppression 0.2 mmol/L, QTc-prolongation 20 ms, or heart rate increase 8 beats per minute) was evaluated. RESULTS: Bronchodilation was maintained for 24h with both formoterol doses and for 7-11h with salbutamol. Maximum bronchodilation and systemic effects were similar after formoterol and salbutamol, except for statistically significantly larger maximum heart rate and palpitation and tremor scores after salbutamol. Systemic responses were similarly brief for formoterol and salbutamol (7 h). CONCLUSIONS: The airway effects of inhaled formoterol are of long duration, whereas the systemic effects are of a similarly short duration as salbutamol. Thus, the time with clinically relevant bronchodilation without systemic effects is substantially longer after formoterol than after salbutamol.     

Comparison of the bronchodilating effects of inhaled formoterol,salmeterol and salbutamol in asthmatic patients

Ten subjects with various degrees of asthma severity underwent a three-day trial, with the aim of evaluating the bronchodilating effect of inhaled formoterol (12 micro g), in comparison with salbutamol (200 micro g) and salmeterol (50 micro g). The bronchodilation afforded by formoterol paralleled that of salbutamol in rapidity (mean percentage increases in functional measurements (FEV(1)) vs. baseline recorded 5 min after drug administration: 7.7%, 9.3%, and 0.3% for salbutamol, formoterol and salmeterol, respectively) and that of salmeterol in duration (mean percentage increases in FEV(1) vs. baseline recorded 12h after drug administration: 16.8% and 15.9% for formoterol and salmeterol, respectively). Moreover, the maximal effect of formoterol resulted to be slightly higher in comparison with salbutamol (P<0.001) and salmeterol (P<0.05); in this regard, the mean percentage increases in FEV(1) vs. baseline recorded 2h after salbutamol and formoterol, and 4h after salmeterol were 22.3%, 29.5%, and 24.6%, respectively. Therefore, these results suggest that formoterol can be used, in addition to its utilization as long-acting bronchodilator, also as an effective rescue medication for the immediate relief of asthma symptoms.     

Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma

Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.     

Reversing acute bronchoconstriction in asthma: the effect of bronchodilator tolerance after treatment with formoterol.

Continuous treatment with a short-acting beta2-agonist can lead to reduced bronchodilator responsiveness during acute bronchoconstriction. This study evaluated bronchodilator tolerance to salbutamol following regular treatment with a long-acting beta2-agonist, formoterol. The modifying effect of intravenous corticosteroid was also studied. Ten asthmatic subjects (using inhaled steroids) participated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. or matching placebo was given for 10-14 days with >2 weeks washout. Following each treatment, patients underwent a methacholine challenge to induce a fall in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 20%, then salbutamol 100 microg, 100 microg, and 200 microg was inhaled via a spacer at 5 min intervals, with a further 400 microg at 45 min. After a third single-blind formoterol treatment period, hydrocortisone 200 mg was given intravenously prior to salbutamol. Dose-response curves for change in FEV1 with salbutamol were compared using analysis of covariance to take account of methacholine-induced changes in spirometry. Regular formoterol resulted in a significantly lower FEV1 after salbutamol at each time point compared to placebo (p<0.01). The area under the curves (AUCs) for 15 (AUC0-15) and 45 (AUC0-45) min were 28.8% and 29.5% lower following formoterol treatment (p<0.001). Pretreatment with hydrocortisone had no significant modifying effect within 2 h of administration. It is concluded that significant tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of inhaled salbutamol occurs 36 h after stopping the regular administration of formoterol. This bronchodilator tolerance is evident in circumstances of acute bronchconstriction.     

Prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist

The prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with inhaled formoterol (12 micrograms) was compared with inhaled salbutamol (200 micrograms) and placebo in 12 patients with atopic asthma. Both drugs produced equal bronchodilation 2 and 4 h after administration. Both drugs protected equally against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction 2 h after administration; at 4 h, formoterol gave undiminished protection from that seen at 2 h while salbutamol was no more effective than placebo.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.     

Bronchodilator effect of inhaled formoterol vs salbutamol over 12 hours

The bronchodilator effects were compared in 16 stable asthma patients for 12 hours after either 12 micrograms formoterol or 200 micrograms salbutamol from a metered-dose aerosol in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The FEV1 measured before 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after administration was used as the parameter. From 2 hours onwards after dosage, the bronchodilator effect of formoterol was statistically significantly greater than that of salbutamol. The effect of formoterol lasted longer, and even after 12 hours, the FEV1 was still 20 percent above the baseline value. This is clinically significant and offers new possibilities for treatment of the so-called "morning dip." Both agents were well tolerated.     

Onset of action following formoterol Turbuhaler and salbutamol pMDI in reversible chronic airway obstruction

Short-acting beta(2)-agonists are currently recommended for symptom relief in asthma and the treatment of mild, acute exacerbations in COPD. However, formoterol has as fast an onset of action as salbutamol with the additional benefit of longer-lasting bronchodilation (approximately 12 h). Furthermore, systemic side effects observed with formoterol are of a similar duration but less pronounced than with short-acting beta(2)-agonists. In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, 20 adult patients with reversible chronic airway obstruction (intrinsic asthma or COPD) inhaled single doses of formoterol 9 microg or salbutamol 100 microg (group A) or formoterol 18 microg or salbutamol 200 microg (group B). FEV(1) was measured prior to and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min following inhalation of study drug. No significant differences in FEV(1) values were observed between group A (P=0.704) or group B (P=0.270) at baseline, or at 5 (Group A: P=0.340; Group B: P=0.559) and 15 min (Group A: P=0.526; Group B: P=0.818) post dose. No adverse events were reported during the study. Formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at the recommended doses.     

Formoterol, a new long-acting beta 2 agonist, inhaled twice daily, in stable asthmatic subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether formoterol, a new beta 2 agonist with experimentally documented long duration, is clinically more effective than salbutamol in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma. DESIGN: Randomized double-blind between-patient comparison between treatment with formoterol and with salbutamol during four weeks. SETTING: Asthma/allergy department in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with chronic stable asthma, who during a two-week run-in period with inhaled salbutamol, 4 x 100 micrograms twice a day, used at least four additional doses (100 micrograms each) daily, were randomly assigned to use either formoterol or salbutamol. Thirty-five patients were evaluated for efficacy. One early withdrawal and one dropout were found in the salbutamol group. The groups were similar with respect to demographic data and baseline lung function. INTERVENTIONS: During the four-week study period, the patients used either formoterol (4 x 6 micrograms twice a day and as necessary, n = 19) or salbutamol (4 x 100 micrograms twice a day and as necessary, n = 16). Inhaled steroids and orally administered theophylline were allowed if doses were kept constant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median number of additional doses per 24 h (median of two weeks) of the test aerosols was 0 (range, 0 to 6) for formoterol and 4 (range, 0 to 14) for salbutamol (p less than 0.01). Morning and evening PEFRs were 422 (SEM = 31) and 443 (SEM = 30), respectively, for formoterol, and 335 (SEM = 30) and 360 (SEM = 26), respectively, for salbutamol (p = 0.05 for both). Formoterol was superior (p less than 0.05) to salbutamol with respect to control of asthma symptoms, estimated duration of action and patient preference. Side effects did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled formoterol administered twice a day and as necessary was clinically more effective than the same regimen of salbutamol.     

Relief of dyspnoea by beta2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Virtually all asthma patients use brorichodilators. Formoterol and salbutamol have a rapid onset of bronchodilating effect, whereas salmeterol acts slower. We studied the onset of improvement of dyspnoea sensation after inhalation with these bronchodilators and placebo to reverse a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction as a model for an acute asthma attack. Seventeen patients with asthma completed this randomised, double-blind, crossover, double-dummy study. On 4 test days, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and Borg score were recorded and patients were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell with > or = 30% of baseline value. Thereafter, formoterol 12 microg via Turbuhaler, salbutamol 50 microg via Turbuhaler, salmeterol 50 microg via Diskhaler, or placebo was inhaled. FEV1 and Borg scores were assessed during the following 60 min. The first sensed improvement of Borg score was significantly (P<0.05) faster achieved with formoterol (geometric mean (Gmean) (range) 1.5 (1-40) min) and salbutamol 1.8 (1-10) min than with salmeterol 4.5 (1-30) min and placebo 3.4 (1-40) min. The Borg score returned significantly faster to the baseline value with formoterol, salbutamol, and salmeterol (Gmean time 13.8 (1-75), 13.4 (1-60), and 18.0 (1-75) min, respectively) than with placebo (33.6 (1-75 min). Formoterol and salbutamol act significantly faster than salmeterol in relieving dyspnoea induced by methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, in patients with asthma.     

Protective effect and duration of action of formoterol aerosol on exercise-induced asthma.

The short-term protective effect on exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and the duration of action of formoterol, given by metered dose aerosol at a dose of 24 micrograms, were compared with salbutamol (200 micrograms) and placebo in twelve asthmatic EIA-positive patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three period cross-over study. On each treatment day the patients were given one of the drugs or placebo and two exercise tests were performed at the second and at the eighth hour after dosing. Using a standard procedure, exercise was performed by treadmill in well-controlled environmental conditions. In the first test at 2 h a significant difference relative to placebo (p less than 0.001) at each incremental time after exercise (i.e. 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 min) was obtained with both formoterol and salbutamol, without any significant difference between formoterol and salbutamol. After the eighth hour test formoterol still protected against EIA in comparison to both salbutamol and placebo. The effect of salbutamol at this time was not different from placebo. No adverse effects were reported in any treatment group. Formoterol has a long duration of action in protecting against EIA that persisted for eight hours, removing the need to dose with beta 2-agonist before every exercise.     

The pulmonary and extra-pulmonary effects of high-dose formoterol in COPD: a comparison with salbutamol

OBJECTIVES: Formoterol, a beta(2) agonist with a rapid onset of effect and long duration of action, can be used as maintenance and reliever medication for asthma and COPD. We compared the pulmonary and extra-pulmonary effects of cumulative doses of formoterol and salbutamol in patients with COPD to assess efficacy and safety. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 12 patients with moderate to severe COPD inhaled, via Turbuhaler, 10 doses of formoterol (total metered dose, 120 microg, equivalent to a 90- microg delivered dose), salbutamol (total metered dose 2000 microg) or placebo at 2-min intervals on separate days. The effects on lung function (FEV(1) and PEF), heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, corrected QT interval (QTc), T-wave height and plasma potassium were assessed before each dose, 15 min after each dose, and at half-hourly intervals for 3 h following the final dose. RESULTS: Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in significant improvement in lung function (measured 30 min after the last dose) when compared with placebo. There were no clinically important or statistically significant changes in heart rate, QTc, T-wave height, plasma potassium, oxygen saturation, or systolic and diastolic blood pressures with formoterol or salbutamol. One patient developed ventricular trigeminy after both formoterol and salbutamol. She had had ventricular ectopics on her screening electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Formoterol and salbutamol both produced significant improvement in lung function and were similarly well tolerated in high doses, as might be taken by a patient for relief of COPD symptoms.     

Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

Formoterol induces tolerance to the bronchodilating effect of Salbutamol following methacholine-provocation test in asthmatic children

OBJECTIVES: To study whether Formoterol treatment affect the bronchodilator response to salbutamol after methacholine-provocation test (MPT) in asthmatic children. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Children aged 7-16 years with mild-persistent to moderate asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids, were enrolled. After 2-weeks of run-in period, subjects were randomized to inhaled Formoterol 9 microg bid (n=19) or placebo (n=19) for 2 weeks. MPT with salbutamol-recovery curve was performed at the beginning and at the end of the trial period. Measurements of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), symptoms score, rescue bronchodilator usage and side effects were recorded daily. The primary end-points were the change in FEV1 0-10 min after salbutamol inhalation and the recovery time from 80 to 100% of pretest FEV1. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA with repeated measures. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the bronchodilator response to salbutamol and an improved PEFR in the Formoterol group. There was no difference in all other parameters. CONCLUSION: Formoterol decreases the bronchodilator response to salbutamol following MPT. Whether this phenomenon has clinical implication during acute asthma needs further studies.     

Formoterol, a new inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonist, has a longer blocking effect than albuterol on hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction

The duration of effect of inhaled formoterol (24 micrograms) was compared with that of a placebo and that of inhaled albuterol (200 micrograms) in 12 adult asthmatic subjects who underwent hyperventilation tests with cold dry air (-20 degrees C) on 4 study days. On the control day, they were subjected to four hyperventilation tests to ensure functional stability. On the 3 remaining days, after a first hyperventilation test, they inhaled placebo, albuterol, or formoterol in randomized, double-blind fashion. The hyperventilation test was repeated 1, 4, and 8 h and, if the blocking effect was still present, 12 and 24 h after the drug had been administered. The dose of hyperventilation of cold air causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) was interpolated on the dose-response curve. The magnitude of the blocking effect at each time interval on each study day was assessed by comparing the changes in PD20 from baseline with the within-day variability of PD20 (standardized change in PD20). The acute bronchodilator effect was not significantly different as assessed 15 min (21 +/- 14% for albuterol and 18 +/- 18% for formoterol) and 1 h (20 +/- 13% for albuterol and 18 +/- 17% for formoterol) after administering the medication. The duration of the blocking effect, defined as the return to 2 SD from the standardized change in PD20, was significantly more prolonged for formoterol (8.0 +/- 3.4 h) than for albuterol (3.0 +/- 1.7 h) (t = 4.2, p less than 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Onset of action of single doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with stable COPD

We studied 16 patients with stable COPD in a double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled, within patient study to see if formoterol could be used as a rescue drug. We compared the of onset of bronchodilation obtained with formoterol 12 microg (metered dose corresponding to 9 microg delivered dose) and formoterol 24 microg (metered dose corresponding to 18 microg delivered dose), both delivered via Turbuhaler, with that of salbutamol 400 microg and salbutamol 800 microg delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Patients inhaled single doses of placebo, formoterol and salbutamol on five separate days. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after inhalation of each treatment. We examined two separate criteria for deciding if a response was greater than that expected by a random variation of the measurement: (1) a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value; (2) an absolute increase in FEV1 of at least 200 ml. Formoterol 12 microg (15.2 min; 95% CI 9.5-21.0) and formoterol 24 microg (15.1 min; 95% CI 8.9-21.2) caused a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value almost rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg (13.6 min; 95% CI 7.1-20.1) and salbutamol 800 microg (14.5 min; 95% CI 7.1-21.9). No significant difference (P=0.982) in onset of action was seen between the four active treatments. According to Criterion 2, the mean time to 200 ml increase in FEV1 was 11.1 min (95% CI: 7.0-15.2) after salbutamol 400 microg, 13.0 min (95% CI: 7.9-18.1) after salbutamol 800 microg, 14.7 min (95% CI: 7.1-22.4) after formoterol 12 microg, and 12.7 min (95% CI: 7.4-18.0) after formoterol 24 microg. Again, there was no significant difference (P= 0.817) between the four active treatments. Formoterol Turbuhaler 12 microg and 24 microg caused bronchodilation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg and 800 microg given via pMDI.     

Rapid onset of action of inhaled formoterol in asthmatic patients.

Twelve patients with stable asthma (mean age, 39 years; asthma duration, 11 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 65 percent of predicted; and reversibility, 31 percent) were studied in a double-blind crossover trial. The patients were studied during three test days. Airway resistance and specific airway conductance (Raw and SGaw) were measured using a body plethysmograph and pulse rate, blood pressure, tremor, and subjective effects were recorded before and 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after the test doses. A baseline Raw variability of +/- 20 percent was allowed between the test days. Formoterol 12 micrograms, 24 micrograms, and terbutaline 500 micrograms were given in a spacer (Nebulator) in a randomized double-blind crossover manner as two puffs with a 30-s interval in between. The effect of formoterol 12 micrograms on Raw was significantly better than terbutaline after 3, 5, 10, 60, and 120 min. Formoterol 24 micrograms was significantly better than terbutaline as soon as 3 min after inhalation and at every point in time after that. Formoterol 24 micrograms tended to be better than formoterol 12 micrograms but the differences were not significant at any point in time. All three treatments were well-tolerated. No differences were observed for pulse rate, blood pressure, tremor, or palpitations. The overall onset of bronchodilatation after formoterol 12 and 24 micrograms was faster than after terbutaline 500 micrograms. The tolerability of formoterol was good.     

The 24 h duration of bronchodilator action of the budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler

INTRODUCTION: The duration of bronchodilator action of the long-acting beta-agonist formoterol when administered in the evening has not been investigated. In this study we have investigated whether a single evening dose of formoterol, administered from the combination budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) Turbuhaler significantly attenuates the circadian rhythm in airway tone over 24 h. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean FEV1 84% predicted) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Subjects inhaled, in random order, placebo or BUD/F (2x100/6 microg) administered in the evening (2000 h) on two separate occasions. Lung function measurements including FEV1, specific airways conductance (sGaw) and maximum expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity (MEF(25-75%)) were assessed at baseline, at 1 h and subsequently every 4 h post-dose for 24 h. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, BUD/F significantly improved the three measures of airways function throughout the 24 h period, with a difference in FEV1 at 24 h of 0.20L (0.04-0.35L). BUD/F attenuated the biphasic pattern of the circadian rhythm in airway tone. CONCLUSION: The single evening administration of formoterol from the combination BUD/F inhaler resulted in a duration of bronchodilation of at least 24 h.