Non‐radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy

Gallstone diseases are common during pregnancy. In most cases, patients are asymptomatic and do not require any treatment. However, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis may potentially become life‐threatening for both mother and fetus and often require urgent intervention. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard technique for removing common bile duct stones, it is associated with ionizing radiation that could carry teratogenic risk. Non‐radiation ERCP (NR‐ERCP) is reported to be effective without incurring this risk. Two techniques have been described to confirm bile duct cannulation: bile aspiration and image guidance. With bile aspiration, biliary cannulation is confirmed by applying suction to the cannula to yield bile, thus confirming an intrabiliary position. Image guidance involves using ultrasound or direct visualization (choledochoscopy) to confirm selective biliary cannulation or duct clearance. Once cannulation is achieved, the stones are removed using standard ERCP techniques and tools. Case series and retrospective studies have reported success rates of up to 90% for NR‐ERCP with complication rates similar to standard ERCP. Pregnancy outcomes are not adversely affected by NR‐ERCP, but whether the avoidance of radiation carries benefit for the baby is unknown. Prospective comparative trials are lacking. NR‐ERCP is technically demanding and should be attempted only by skilled biliary endoscopists in properly equipped and staffed health‐care institutions, in a multidisciplinary setting.     

胆总管结石高龄患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗的安全性和有效性探讨

目的通过比较不同年龄段患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的应用情况,分析和探讨ERCP在高龄患者中应用的有效性和安全性。方法选取2012年1月至2015年1月,石河子大学医学院第一附属医院进行胆总管结石ERCP患者360例,按年龄分组,其中≥75岁患者120例,60~75岁患者123例,≤60岁患者117例。记录患者ERCP操作及并发症情况,对结果进行统计分析。结果 360例患者进行了377次ERCP,操作成功率及并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05);结论胆总管结石高龄组患者进行ERCP操作能够取得和非高龄组一样的疗效,ERCP在各年龄段的操作是安全有效的。     

Single balloon enteroscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejuno anastomosis

AIM:To evaluate single balloon enteroscopy in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography(ERC)in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunoanastomosis(HJA).METHODS:The study took place from January 2009to December 2011 and we retrospectively assessed 15patients with Roux-en-Y HJA who had signs of biliary obstruction.In total,23 ERC procedures were performed in these patients and a single balloon videoen-teroscope(Olympus SIF Q 180)was used in all of the cases.A transparent overtube was drawn over the videoenteroscope and it freely moved on the working part of the enteroscope.Its distal end was equipped with a silicone balloon that was inflated by air from an external pump at a pressure of≤5.4 kPa.The technical limitations or rather the parameters of the single balloon enteroscope(working length-200 cm,diameter of the working channel-2.8 mm,absence of Albarran bridge)showed the need for special endoscopic instrumentation.RESULTS:Cannulation success was reached in diagnostic ERC in 12 of 15 patients.ERC findings were normal in 1 of 12 patients.ERC in the remaining 11 patients showed some pathological changes.One of these(cystic bile duct dilation)was subsequently resolved surgically.Endoscopic treatment was initialized in the remaining 10 patients(5 with HJA stenosis,2 with choledocholithiasis,and 3 with both).This treatment was successful in 9 of 10 patients.The endoscopic therapeutic procedures included:balloon dilatation of HJA stenosis-11 times(7 patients);choledocholitiasis extraction-five times(5 patients);biliary plastic stent placement-six times(4 patients);and removal of biliary stents placed by us-six times(4 patients).The mean time of performing a single ERC was 72 min.The longest procedure took 110 min and the shortest took34 min.This shows that it is necessary to allow for more time in individual procedures.Furthermore,these procedures require the presence of an anesthesiologist.We did not observe any complications in these 15 patients.CONCLUSION:This method is more demanding than s     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for pediatric choledocholithiasis: Assessing the need for endoscopic intervention

AIM:To assess pediatric patients for choledocholithiasis.We applied current adult guidelines to identify predictivefactors in children.METHODS:A single-center retrospective analysis was performed at a tertiary children's hospital.We evaluated 44 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography(ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis.Patients were stratified into those with common bile duct stones(CBDS) at ERCP vs those that did not using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ASGE) guidelines(Very Strong and Strong criteria) for suspected CBDS.RESULTS:CBDS were identified in 84% at the time of ERCP.Abdominal ultrasound identified CBDS in 36% of patients.Conjugated bilirubin ≥ 0.5 mg/d L was an independent risk factor for CBDS(P = 0.003).The Very Strong(59.5%) and Strong(48.6%) ASGE criteria identified the majority of patients(P = 0.0001).A modified score using conjugated bilirubin had a higher sensitivity(81.2% vs 59.5%) and more likely to identify a stone than the standard criteria,odds ratio of 25.7 compared to 8.8.Alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase values identified significant differences in a subset of patients with odds ratio of 4.1 and 3.25,respectively.CONCLUSION:Current adult guidelines identified the majority of pediatric patients with CBDS,but specific pediatric guidelines may improve detection,thus decreasing risks and unnecessary procedures.     

Prospective study of endoscopic ultrasound performance in suspected choledocholithiasis

Background: The close proximity of the echoendoscope to the extrahepatic bile ductal system and its safety make endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) an excellent method for examining the common bile duct (CBD). The aim of the present study was to compare EUS diagnostic performance for CBD stones with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Methods: A prospective series of our first 60 patients (65% women, average age 43 years) who were referred for ERC for suspicion of choledocholithiasis based on clinical, biochemical and cross‐sectional imaging (ultrasonography [US] or computed tomography [CT]) data underwent radial EUS. EUS results were recorded as positive or negative for CBD stones before starting the ERC. All patients underwent ERC with a balloon sweep of the bile duct as the standard of reference for CBD stone. All procedures were performed during the same endoscopy session by a single endoscopist who was blinded to the clinical, biochemical and imaging data. Results: Sixty‐five percent of our patients had low to moderate risk for CBD stones. EUS diagnoses were confirmed by ERC as follows: 23 true positive, 33 true negative, three false negative and one false positive (sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 96%, and negative predictive value of 92%; overall accuracy of 93%). Compared to the EUS diagnostic accuracy (90%) during the first 30 cases, EUS had a very high diagnostic accuracy (97%) for CBD stones during the last 30 cases (P = 0.31). Conclusion: EUS is highly accurate for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. The EUS learning curve is relatively short for CBD stones.     

Impact of the operator's experience on value of high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: A prospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold standard

Objective. Transabdominal ultrasound (US) is the most frequently used imaging method for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution US in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones depending on the operator's experience and in comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) as the gold standard. Material and methods. From April 2003 through November 2004, 126 patients referred because of clinically and biochemically suspected common bile duct stones were included in the study. Two patients were excluded because they refused to undergo ERC. Consequently, the study comprised 124 patients (86 F, 38 M, mean age 63.2 years, range 21–91 years). High-resolution US was performed (2–5 MHz sector scanner; Siemens Elegra, Erlangen, Germany) by operators who were unaware of the results of other imaging procedures. The definitive diagnosis was established by means of ERC. Results. Thirty-five out of 124 patients were investigated by experienced examiners. Twenty-seven of 35 patients (77%) were found to have stones at ERC. Bile duct stones were correctly found by US in 22 out of 27 patients (sensitivity 82%, 95% CI: 63–92). Of the 8 patients without stones at ERC, one false-positive diagnosis was made with US (specificity 88%, 95% CI: 53–98). Correct diagnoses were made in 29 out of 35 (accuracy 83%, 95% CI: 67–92) patients investigated by experienced examiners. Eighty-nine out of 124 patients were investigated by less-experienced examiners. Fifty-four of 89 patients (61%) were found to have stones at ERC. Choledocholithiasis was found correctly in only 25 out of 54 patients (sensitivity 46%, 95% CI: 34–59). Of the 35 patients without stones at ERC, three false-positive diagnoses were made with US (specificity 91%, 95% CI: 78–97). In conclusion, correct diagnoses were observed in 57 of 89 patients (accuracy 64%, 95% CI: 54–73) investigated by less-experienced examiners (p<0.05 in comparison with the results of experienced examiners). Conclusions. High-resolution US carried out by experienced examiners has a high diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Therefore, good training and continued experience are prerequisites for successful sonographic detection of bile duct stones using US. Under these conditions, further expensive and invasive methods such as ERC, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography may not be necessary in cases with a clear sonographic diagnosis.     

Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for Roux-en-Y reconstruction patients with papilla of Vater or bilioenteric anastomosis

Objective. Roux-en-Y reconstructions can be divided into intact papilla of Vater and bilioenteric anastomosis (BEA) with respect to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERC (DBE-ERC) may produce different results between the two populations but lacks studies. Material and methods. Forty-seven patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis undergoing 73 procedures of DBE-ERC were enrolled between July 2007 and August 2013. There were 14 patients with intact papilla of Vater (group A) and 33 patients with BEA (group B). The effectiveness of DBE-ERC, including data of reaching the blind end, performance of ERC, results of endoscopic therapies, and follow-up were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results. For reaching the blind end, the success rate was not different between the groups (85.7% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.7), but the mean procedure time was significantly shorter for group A (28 min vs. 52 min, p = 0.01). For ERC, the success rate was not different between the groups (91.7% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.53), but the mean procedure time was significantly longer for group A (28.4 min vs. 4 min, p < 0.001). All endoscopic therapies could be successfully performed in both groups. No group A patients and five (23.8%) group B patients developed recurrent biliary stricture/stones requiring interventions during a mean follow-up period of 26.1 months. Conclusions. DBE-ERC was effective for both populations with biliary disorders. Reaching the blind end was more difficult but ERC was easier for patients with BEA in terms of procedure time rather than success rates.     

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis

Background and Aim: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) are two common nonsurgical treatments endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EPBD and EST in the treatment for choledocholithiasis, confining the analysis to work reported in the last decade. Methods: The rate of overall postoperative complications was chosen as the primary outcome, and 10 other outcomes were secondary outcomes. Relative risk (RR) or Peto odds ratio (OR) were computed as the measures of pooled effects. We planned sensitivity analyses a priori for examining the change in robustness of the sensitivity to excluding studies with some inappropriate objects, technique defects or without full‐text acquisition. Results: For complete stone removal, EPBD was similar to EST (95% vs. 96%, P = 0.36) and overall postoperative complications (14.0% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.53). The incidence of post‐ERCP cholangitis (2.5% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.40), basket impaction (0.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.16) and perforation (0.0% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.17) were equivalent between EPBD and EST. On the other hand, EPBD caused more post‐ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) (9.4% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.00001), but less hemorrhage (0.1% vs. 4.2%, P < 0.00001). People undergoing EPBD required more use of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy (35.0% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.0004). The results of sensitivity analyses showed no substantial change. Conclusion: EPBD is comparable to EST for stone extraction, though it requires more endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy (EML). EPBD may outweigh EST for patients with coagulopathy; however, it may cause more PEP.     

Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method

Background—Magneticresonance cholangiography (MRC) is a new technique for non-invasiveimaging of the biliary tract.
Aim—To assess theresults of MRC in patients with suspected bile duct stones as comparedwith those obtained with reference imaging methods.
Patients/Methods—70patients (34 men and 36 women, mean (SD) age 71 (15.5) years; median75) with suspected bile duct stones were included (cholangitis, 33;pancreatitis, three; suspected post-cholecystectomycholedocholithiasis, nine; cholestasis, six; stones suspected onultrasound or computed tomography scan, 19). MR cholangiograms with twodimensional turbo spin echo sequences were acquired. Endoscopicretrograde cholangiography with or without sphincterotomy (n = 63),endosonography (n = 5), or intraoperative cho- langiography (n = 2)were the reference imaging techniques used for the study and wereperformed within 12 hours of MRC. Radiologists were blinded to theresults of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and previous investigations.
Results—49patients (70%) had bile duct stones on reference imaging (common bileduct, 44, six of which impacted in the papilla; intrahepatic, four;cystic duct stump, one). Stone size ranged from 1 to 20 mm (mean 6.1, median 5.5). Twenty seven patients (55%) had bile duct stones smallerthan 6 mm. MRC diagnostic accuracy for bile duct lithiasis was:sensitivity, 57.1%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value,100%; negative predictive value, 50%.
Conclusions—Stonessmaller than 6 mm are still often missed by MRC when standard equipmentis used. The general introduction of new technical improvements isneeded before this method can be considered reliable for the diagnosisof bile duct stones.

Keywords:bile duct calculi; endoscopic retrogradecholangiography; magnetic resonance cholangiography

     

内镜超声和经内镜逆行胰胆管造影在慢性胰腺炎诊断中的价值

目的 评价EUS和ERCP对慢性胰腺炎(CP)的诊断灵敏度和特异度,探讨在CP诊断中EUS和ERCP的价值.方法 采用多中心联合调查方法,回顾分析1994年5月至2004年5月全国22个分研究中心的确诊的CP病例,以组织学诊断为"金标准",采用接受者工作曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)分析EUS和ERCP的诊断灵敏度和特异度.结果 共人选CP患者1994例,男1298例,女696例.年龄5～85(48.9 ±15.0)岁.所有CP患者中,有组织学诊断239例(11.98%);胰腺外分泌功能试验(BT-PABA)261例(13.09%),腹部平片416例(20.86%),腹部B超1424例(71.41%),CT 889例(44.58%),MRI和MRCP245例(12.29%),ERCP628例(31.49%),EUS258例(12.94%).各诊断方法的诊断灵敏度和特异度分别为EUS(88%和93%)、ERCP(87%和93%)、MRI和MRCP(66%和85%)、CT(61%和85%)、B超(69%和82%)、腹部平片(32%和80%)、BT-PABA(83%和80%).结论 在CP诊断方法中,EUS和ERCP对CP且具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,EUS较ERCP灵敏度和特异度更高.     

Mucin gene expression in bile of patients with and without gallstone disease, collected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

AIM： To investigate the pattern of mucin expression and concentration in bile obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography （ERC） in relation to gallstone disease.METHODS： Bile samples obtained at ERC from 29 consecutive patients, 17 with and 12 without gallstone disease were evaluated for mucin content by gel filtration on a Sepharose CL-4B column. Dot blot analysis for bile mucin apoproteins was performed with antibodies to Mucin 1 （MUC1）, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, MUC5B and MUC6. Staining intensity score （0-3） was used as a measure of antigen expression.RESULTS： MUCl, MUC2, MUC3, MUCSAC, MUC5B and MUC6 were demonstrated in 34.4%, 34.4%, 51.7%, 51.7%, 55.1% and 27.5% of bile samples, respectively.The staining intensity scores were 0.62 ± 0.94, 0.58 ± 0.90, 0.79 ± 0.97, 1.06 ± 1.22, 1.20 ± 2.26 and 0.41 ± 0.73, respectively. Mean mucin concentration measured in bile by the Sepharose CL-4B method was 22.8 ± 24.0 mg/mL （range 3.4-89.0 mg/mL）. Mean protein concentration was 8.1 ± 4.8 mg/mL （range 1.7-23.2 mg/mL）.CONCLUSION： High levels of MUC3, MUC5AC and MUC5B are expressed in bile aspirated during ERC examination. A specific pattern of mucin gene expression or change in mucin concentration was not found in gallstone disease.     

Poorly expandable common bile duct with stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

AIM: To describe characteristics of a poorly expandable (PE) common bile duct (CBD) with stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.METHODS: A PE bile duct was characterized by a rigid and relatively narrowed distal CBD with retrograde dilatation of the non-PE segment. Between 2003 and 2006, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) images and chart reviews of 1213 patients with newly diagnosed CBD stones were obtained from the computer database of Therapeutic Endoscopic Center in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients with characteristic PE bile duct on ERC were identified from the database. Data of the patients as well as the safety and technical success of therapeutic ERC were collected and analyzed retrospectively.RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with CBD stones and characteristic PE segments were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 45 years (range, 20 to 92 years); 66.7% of the patients were men. The diameters of the widest non-PE CBD segment, the PE segment, and the largest stone were 14.3 ± 4.9 mm, 5.8 ± 1.6 mm, and 11.2 ± 4.7 mm, respectively. The length of the PE segment was 39.7 ± 15.4 mm (range, 12.3 mm to 70.9 mm). To remove the CBD stone(s) completely, mechanical lithotripsy was required in 25 (83.3%) patients even though the stone size was not as large as were the difficult stones that have been described in the literature. The stone size and stone/PE segment diameter ratio were associated with the need for lithotripsy. Post-ERC complications occurred in 4 cases: pancreatitis in 1, cholangitis in 2, and an impacted Dormia basket with cholangitis in 1. Two (6.7%) of the 28 patients developed recurrent CBD stones at follow-up (50 ± 14 mo) and were successfully managed with therapeutic ERC.CONCLUSION: Patients with a PE duct frequently require mechanical lithotripsy for stones extraction. To retrieve stones successfully and avoid complications, these patients should be identified during ERC.     

New classification system for indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography predicts diagnoses and adverse events

Background: Indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have received little attention, especially in scientific or objective terms.

Aim: To review the prevailing ERCP indications in the literature, and to propose and evaluate a new ERCP indication system, which relies on more objective pre-procedure parameters.

Methods: An analysis was conducted on 1758 consecutive ERCP procedures, in which contemporaneous use was made of an a-priori indication system. Indications were based on the objective pre-procedure parameters and divided into primary [cholangitis, clinical evidence of biliary leak, acute (biliary) pancreatitis, abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), or change/removal of stent for benign/malignant disease] and secondary [combination of two or three of: pain attributable to biliary disease (‘P’), imaging evidence of biliary disease (‘I’), and abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) (‘L’)]. A secondary indication was only used if a primary indication was not present. The relationship between this newly developed classification system and ERCP findings and adverse events was examined.

Results: The indications of cholangitis and positive IOC were predictive of choledocholithiasis at ERCP (101/154 and 74/141 procedures, respectively). With respect to secondary indications, only if all three of ‘P’, ‘I’, and ‘L’ were present there was a statistically significant association with choledocholithiasis (χ²(1)?=?35.3, p?χ²(1)?=?17.0, p?Conclusions: An a-priori-based indication system for ERCP, which relies on pre-ERCP objective parameters, provides a more useful and scientific classification system than is available currently.     

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in cholelithiasis coexisting with choledocholithiasis

Background

An accepted treatment strategy for cholelithiasis with secondary choledocholithiasis is the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). Although early cholecystectomy is advised, there is no consensus about the time interval between LC and ERCP. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the time interval between ERCP and ERCP on operation outcomes.

Methods

Patients with cholelithiasis and a risk of choledocholithiasis underwent ERCP. Patients were grouped as those operated on between 24 and 72 h after ERCP (group 1) and those operated on more than 72 h after ERCP (group 2). Patients’ age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, abdominal ultrasonography findings, white blood cell count, total serum bilirubin, ALP, amylase, ALT, AST, GGT levels, ERCP findings, time interval between ERCP and LC, conversion rate, median postoperative hospital stay, median operation time, intraoperative complication and postoperative complication rates were collected.

Results

There was no significant difference between the demographics of the patients in both groups. The median operation time, median postoperative hospital stay and conversion rate in group 2 were significantly higher than those of group 1. More postoperative complications were seen in group 2.

Conclusion

Early cholecystectomy after ERCP, within 72 h, has better outcomes, probably due to the inflammatory processes.     

内镜下逆行胰胆管造影加取石术诊治胆总管结石

[目的]评价内镜下逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)同时行乳头括约肌切开术(EST)对胆总管结石的诊断与治疗价值.[方法]回顾性分析98例经B超检查诊断为胆总管结石的患者,先行ERCP检查,再行内镜下EST治疗胆总管结石.[结果]98例中ERCP准确诊断胆总管结石96例,怀疑胆总管结石1例,未发现异常1例,其确诊率为97.9%.96例EST后采取网篮取石、球囊取石和机械碎石网篮取石成功,1例失败.[结论]ERcP对胆总管结石诊断价值较高.EST是一种治疗胆总管结石安全、有效、简便的方法.     

经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后中重度胰腺炎的危险因素分析

探索中重度经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎（post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, PEP）的相关危险因素。 方法：回顾性分析2010年6月——2020年6月期间在空军军医大学第一附属医院消化内科行经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)的6 731例初始乳头胆胰疾病患者的临床资料。插管操作以及术后并发症相关参数均为前瞻性收集。主要研究终点为中重度PEP,通过Logistic回归分析中重度PEP的相关危险因素。 结果：6 731例初始乳头的ERCP患者总体PEP发生率为5.3%（n=359）,中重度PEP发生率为1.0%（n=68）。单因素分析显示女性、ERCP适应证、插管方式、插管时间、插管次数、误进胰管次数以及有无学员参与插管等因素与中重度PEP发生有关（P均<0.10）。多因素回归分析显示,女性（OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.28~4.21, P=0.006）、非胆总管结石（OR=2.04, 95%CI: 1.16~3.59, P=0.014）、插管时间≥5 min(OR=2.23, 95%CI: 1.20~4.13, P=0.011)、误进胰管次数≥1次(OR=1.88, 95%CI: 1.03~3.44, P=0.040)和无学员参与插管（OR=1.81,95%CI: 1.02~3.22, P=0.043）是中重度PEP的独立危险因素。 结论：中重度PEP的独立危险因素包括女性、非胆总管结石、无学员参与的插管以及困难插管等。ERCP围手术期全程管理应重视对上述因素的评估。     

Multidetector computed tomography cholangiography with multiplanar reformation for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) cholangiography with multiplanar reformation (MPR) for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. METHODS: MDCT cholangiography with the MPR technique was performed in 58 patients who were thought to have biliary obstruction. No cholangiographic contrast agent was administered. MRCP in 24 patients, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 46 patients and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) in 24 patients were performed. Eighteen patients underwent biopsy or surgery. The findings on MDCT cholangiography were compared with those of MRCP, ERCP, PTC, biopsy or surgery. RESULTS: The findings of MDCT cholangiography were as follows: choledocholithiasis (n = 34, 56.7%), malignant stricture (n = 14, 23.3%), benign stricture (n = 1, 1.7%), and cholelithiasis (n = 11, 18.3%). A small common bile duct (CBD) stone in one patient could not be detected on MDCT cholangiography. One patient with a small stone in distal CBD detected on MDCT cholangiography had no stone on ERCP. Two patients with initial diagnoses of CBD stones by MDCT cholangiography were disclosed to have malignant bile duct stricture by reference examination. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnosis of bile duct stones were 96.9% and 96.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnosis of bile duct stricture were 85.7% and 100%, respectively. The overall accuracy of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnoses of the causes of biliary obstruction was 89.8%. CONCLUSION: MDCT cholangiography with the MPR technique is a fast and non-invasive technique with relatively high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnoses of the causes of biliary obstruction.