Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal hypertension: the role of laparoscopy

Liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major issue since patients are at risk of serious intraoperative and postoperative complications. The current EASL/AASLD guidelines recommend LR only in case of patients with stage A HCC with well-preserved liver function and consider the presence of portal hypertension (PHT) as a contraindication to surgery. Nevertheless, the literature on this topic is conflicting. Recently several studies reported that favorable outcomes can be achieved with a careful patients’ selection in high volume centers. Laparoscopic LR, when performed by well-trained surgeons and with appropriate indications, proved to be a valid option for the surgical treatment of HCC on cirrhosis offering similar oncologic outcomes but a reduction in surgical related morbidities. Laparoscopic LR thanks to a reduction in the incidence of post-operative liver failure and ascites development in comparison to standard open LR could, in selected cases challenge alternative treatments in the treatment of HCC patients with preserved liver function and clinical signs of mild PHT.     

Value of intraoperative ultrasonography in the surgical treatment of malignant tumors of the liver]

This retrospective study was designed to assess the specific contribution of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOU) in a series of 50 surgical procedures for malignant tumors of the liver (including 27 hepato-cellular carcinomas (HCC) secondary to cirrhosis and 18 metastases). Compared to conventional pre- and intra-operative investigations, IOU was more sensitive (81%) but less specific (27%) for detection of tumor nodules, but was inaccurate in detection of daughter nodules in hepato-cellular carcinomas (HCC) secondary to cirrhosis. The main specific contribution of IOU was assistance in performing surgery. In 14 cases (52%) of HCC secondary to cirrhosis, IOU provided one or several additional pieces of information which resulted in changes of the planned surgical procedure in 11 cases (41%) mainly enabling limited resection of small deep impalpable tumors. In 10 cases (37%), IOU directly guided resection (echo-guided segmentectomy or tumorectomy). Contribution of IOU was poor in primary carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver, but in 8 cases of metastasis (44%) IOU provided additional information which resulted in changes of the intended surgical procedure in 5 cases (28%) mainly leading to a more extensive resection. Finally IOU was considered to be indispensable in 15 cases of HCC cirrhosis (56%) and in 5 cases of metastasis (28%).     

Hepatic resection for 28 patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Twenty-eight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of not larger than 5 cm diameter were surgically treated during the 12 years from 1977 to 1988, twenty-five of them since 1983. Half of the patients were admitted for check up because of elevated serum AFP and were high risk subjects. Serum HBsAg were positive in 24 (85.7%). Serum AFP was less than 10 ng/ml in 2 (7.1%) and greater than or equal to 200 ng/ml in 14 (50%). Coexistent liver cirrhosis was found in 21 (75%). Local resection or partial hepatectomy played a major surgical role in small HCC, especially in the presence of cirrhosis and tumor in right liver. The cumulative survival rates for the 28 patients treated by hepatic resection at 1, 2 and 5 years were 60.6, 42.5 and 42.5 percent. The survival rate of patients with tumor size not larger than 3 cm diameter is not better than those with tumor size between 3 cm and 5 cm. The small HCC patients with AFP less than or equal to 200 ng/ml had better survival than those with AFP greater than 200 ng/ml.     

Good outcomes after resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma in the non-cirrhotic liver

BACKGROUND: The results of partial liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic livers are not well known. Therefore a retrospective study was conducted. METHODS: The medical records of 180 patients with HCC were reviewed. In 40 patients (22%), HCC occurred in a non-cirrhotic liver. A detailed analysis of these patients was performed. The diagnosis HCC was based on imaging and/or percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy. A biopsy of the remaining liver and peroperative findings documented the absence of cirrhosis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent partial liver resection. There was no surgical mortality. The median tumour diameter in the operated patients was 10 cm. Survival rates for operated patients at 1 and 5 years were 96 and 68%, respectively. Significant factors reducing survival were portal vein thrombosis, positive lymph nodes, microscopic vascular invasion and tumour recurrence. Tumour size at the initial moment of diagnosis was not of predictive value. After surgery with curative intent disease-free interval at 1 and 5 years were 86 and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In selected patients without cirrhosis, HCC can be treated successfully by surgical resection, independent of the tumour diameter, with a 5-year survival rate of 68%.     

肝癌手术治疗进展

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased worldwide over the past two decades. Surgical resection and liver transplantation have been demonstrated as potentially curative treatment options, which could be considered in 30% -40% of HCC patients. Recent advancements of surgical treatment have focused not only on the surgical techpiques, but also the hepatic functional reserve evaluation, resectability assessment and the effects of biological characteristics of tumor on prognosis. There is no single variable to evaluate the hepatic functional reserve accurately. Combined Child-Pugh classification, ICGI5, portal vein pressure detection and remanent liver volume measurement are required prior to liver resection. The 5-year survival rate after liver resection for HCC is about 50%. The results are acceptable for some selected patients that underwent tumor resection with thrombectomy, including HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus or bile duct thrombosis. The choice of local resection or regular hepatectomy is still controversial although the former is commonly performed to treat HCC with cirrhosis, and the latter is applied to HCC patients without liver cirrhosis. The results of liver transplanta-tion for HCC are better than liver resection, and the Milan criteria is generally accepted. Any attempts to expand the selection criteria should be cautious because of organ shortage. Salvage transplantation for intrabepatic recurrence after liver resection may be a good choice in some resectable HCC. The recurrence and metastasis after surgical treatment are the main obstacles to achieve better results. Identification of predictive factors could be helpful to develop prevention strategies. Due to the importance of biological characteristics in tumor recurrence and metastasis, a molecular classification to predict prognosis of HCC patients will lead to a more personalized medicine. Targeting key molecules of biological pathways could optimize the therapeutic modality in HCC.     

Systematic Subsegmentectomy by Ultrasound-Guided Finger Compression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis

Background  Systematic and extensive use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) allows us to perform new conservative surgical procedures in liver surgery. This video shows systematic subsegmentectomy by IOUS-guided finger compression for a case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. Methods  The case of a 69-year-old woman with a single 3.5-cm HCC in segment 3 is presented. The patient has hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related well-compensated cirrhosis. After performing a T-inverted laparotomy, the IOUS is carried out for staging. Then, the area of resection is anatomically marked by IOUS-guided finger compression of the subsegmental portal branch feeding the tumor in segment 3. Thus, the resection is performed under intermittent Pringle maneuver using Pean-clasia and bipolar forceps. Results  Ninety-day mortality and morbidity for this patient were nil. No blood transfusions were required. The patient was discharged 8 days after surgery. Conclusions  Systematic subsegmentectomy by IOUS-guided finger compression is a feasible and effective technique, especially for HCC in cirrhosis. It may be potentially applied in each segment of liver as long as the thickness of the parenchyma and the anatomy of liver are suitable. We believe that this technique should be part of the modern liver surgeon’s armamentarium. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation

For decision of adequate surgical therapy and comparison of results differentiation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers is important. Liver resection is the treatment of choice for HCC in noncirrhotic liver. Between 4/94 and 8/99 we treated 54 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by subtotal hepatic resection (n = 40) and orthotopic liver transplantation (n = 14). Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates of the resection group were 45 and 25% (median follow up: 3.5 years). One-year survival in the transplantation group was 72% (median follow up: 2.2 years). In patients with HCC in cirrhosis in UICC stage I to III the optimal therapy is a controversial issue. In these patients the results after liver resection are poor due to high operative mortality and recurrence (3-year recurrence-free survival: 30%). Regarding the literature, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in small (< 3-5 cm, < or = 2 tumors) HCCs arising in cirrhosis with better outcome compared to resection. The data in the literature report 3-year-survival rates after liver transplantation of 60-80%. However, consequent patient selection is necessary for this treatment modality. Due to the limited donor resources liver transplantation is rarely justified in advanced tumors.     

A Critical Evaluation of Hepatic Resection in Cirrhosis: Optimizing Patient Selection and Outcomes

Hepatic resection has long been the mainstay of treatment of primary liver cancers, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the high incidence of cirrhosis in patients with HCC, the use of resection was initially limited by the ability of the cirrhotic liver to sustain the surgical insult and the mass reduction. Today, hepatectomy in cirrhosis is undergoing a remarkable evolution. Although surgical and anesthetic improvements have increased the safety of this option, the rapid development of alternative therapies has decreased the need for it. Local excision for small HCC is likely to be replaced by image-guided, percutaneous ablative techniques. Furthermore, total replacement of a cirrhotic liver may be a more effective long-term cure than resection. Unquestionably, resection remains the optimal approach for patients with large tumors and healthy underlying liver function. The role of rapidly evolving new approaches will remain the subject of intensive inquiry in the years to come. In this report, we have attempted to clarify current practice with respect to the evaluation, selection, and technique of resection in cirrhosis, and identify areas of active inquiry.     

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients is increasing. Despite advances in imaging and laboratory screening which allow earlier diagnosis, the surgeon is all too often confronted with an HCC of advanced stage or arising in the setting of severe cirrhosis; this severely limits the treatment possibilities. Treatment options are constrained not only by the characteristics of the tumor but also by hepatocellular reserve, severity of portal hypertension, and the general condition of the host. "Curative treatments" envisage the complete eradication of the malignancy; they include liver transplantation, resection, or tumor destruction by radiofrequency or alcohol ablation. They are most effective in the early stages of HCC. Total hepatectomy and transplantation, by far the most complex surgical therapy, also has the best results avoiding the all-too-frequent local recurrence of HCC in the residual liver. Other medical and interventional treatments (chemo-embolization, radiotherapy with lipiodol) can only slow the progress of the HCC. Goals for the future include more precise and directed screening of the population at risk, and better chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic treatments.     

Extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: is it justified?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic resection is a well-established treatment for HCC in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and limited disease. However, the role of extended hepatic resection (more than four segments) for HCC in cirrhotic patients has not been elucidated. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 45 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis underwent right or left extended hepatectomy for HCC (group A). Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of these patients were compared with 161 patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection of a lesser extent in the same period (group B). All clinicopathologic and follow-up data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Group A patients had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operation time, and longer hospital stay than group B. However, the two groups were similar in overall morbidity and hospital mortality. There were no significant differences in the incidence of liver failure or other complications. The resection margin width was similar between the two groups. Despite significantly larger tumor size in group A compared with group B, long-term survival was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extended hepatic resection for HCC can be performed in selected cirrhotic patients with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival that are comparable to those of lesser hepatic resection. Extended hepatectomy for large HCC extending from one lobe to the other or central HCC critically related to the hepatic veins is justifiable in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and adequate liver remnant.     

Additional Hepatocellular Carcinomas Undetectable before Surgery

The presence of small additional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) undetectable before hepatic resection is a crucial topic for hepatic surgeons. We assessed the incidence of pathologically diagnosed multiple HCCs in 267 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC. Ninety-five additional HCC nodules were detected in 72 of the patients (27%). The survival rate of these 72 patients was significant worse than for the 195 with single nodular HCC (p= 0.0013). Twenty-one (22%) were detected before surgery, 29 (31%) during surgery, and 45 (47%) on pathologic examination after surgery. The mean nodule diameters for each group were 2.1, 1.0, and 0.9 cm, respectively (p < 0.0001). None of the 21 nodules detected before surgery was well differentiated, whereas 30 of the 74 nodules in the other two groups were well-differentiated. Although the mean nodule diameter of the well-differentiated HCC group was the smallest, there was no significant difference among the three groups assigned according to tumor differentiation (p= 0.2355). Altogether, 9 of 16 patients with additional nodules detected before surgery (56%) and 49 of 59 with additional nodules detected during or after surgery (88%) had cirrhosis of the liver. The odds ratio for detecting a new HCC nodule during or after surgery in the presence of cirrhosis was 5.444 (p= 0.0087). Improvement in the detection of small additional HCC nodules before and during surgery and meticulous follow-up after surgery are necessary for patients with cirrhosis. For patients without cirrhosis, surgical treatment may be performed according to the results of preoperative imaging studies.     

Hepatocellular cancer: Resection or transplantation

Surgery remains the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For HCC without underlying cirrhosis resection remains the mainstay treatment option. Prognosis depends on the stage of the tumor. Survival appears to be better for small (less than 5 cm) solitary tumors with negative resection margins and absence of vascular invasion. At present, liver transplantation does not have an established role in the treatment of HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver. Because of the high recurrence rate, it should not be considered for more advanced disease which is not amenable to resection. The surgical approach in cirrhotics depends not only on the stage of the tumor but also on the liver functional reserve. Tumor size, presence of multifocal disease, and vascular invasion determine the risk of HCC recurrence after resection, and the functional stability of the liver determines both resectability and outcome. In societies in which transplantation is not available, small tumors will be treated with liver resection. The outcome in patients with well preserved liver function is relatively good, at least in the medium term. However, recurrent tumor and progressive hepatic decompensation have significant adverse effects on long-term survival. Poor functional reserve may be associated with significant perioperative mortality and lower survival due to progressive liver failure. In our opinion, for small cirrhosis-related HCCs, liver transplantation offers better long-term prospects than resection. Therefore, if liver transplantation is available as an option it should be considered as the treatment of choice, particularly for younger patients with otherwise good life expectancy. Received for publication on June 9, 1997; accepted on July 3, 1997     

Are Patients with Child's A Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Appropriate Candidates for Liver Transplantation?

We aimed to estimate the survival benefit derived from transplantation in patients with stage II hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child's A cirrhosis, defined as the mean lifetime with transplantation minus the mean lifetime with treatments other than transplantation. We calculated the posttransplantation survival of all adult, first-time, deceased-donor, liver transplant recipients in the United States since the introduction of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease based priority system in February 2002 (n = 36,791). We estimated the posttreatment survival of patients with Child's A cirrhosis and stage II HCC treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) ± transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or surgical resection by conducting a systematic review of the medical literature. In patients with Child's A cirrhosis and stage II HCC, the estimated median survival benefit of liver transplantation compared to RFA ± TACE was 1.5 months at 3 years (range -3.5 to 5.6) and 5.7 months at 5 years (range 0.7-11.4), whereas compared to surgical resection it was 0.7 months at 3 years (range -2.9 to 3) and 2.8 months at 5 years (range -4.4 to 5.7). Liver transplantation in patients with stage II HCC and Child's A cirrhosis results in a very low survival benefit and may not constitute optimal use of scarce liver donor organs.     

Repeat Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicating Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicating primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is between 0.7% and 16%. Repeat liver resection for recurrent HCC complicating PBC is not usually performed and not published because this approach is not generally applicable due to liver dysfunction. We applied repeat liver resection for these diseases. Three patients were diagnosed with PBC. The first HCC was noted at a mean of 6 years (4–17 years) after diagnosis of PBC. The second HCC occurred at a mean of 2.5 years (0.4–3 years) after the first surgery. All patients were treated with curative resection on first and second surgery. The mean overall survival time after the first liver resection was 46 months. Repeat liver resection for recurrent HCC complicating PBC is an option and may improve the outcome.     

肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓的外科治疗

目的 通过对肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓手术病例临床资料的回顾性分析,探讨不同手术方式的疗效以及对远期预后的影响.方法 2008年1月-2012年12月,北京协和医院肝脏外科收治肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓行手术病例共9例,5例病例行根治性半肝切除术,3例行肝部分切除术,1例行术中射频,全部病例均行胆总管探查取栓术;术后通过数字减影血管成像技术进行随诊;全部病例术后随访时间均超过12个月.结果 全部手术病例术后黄疸指数均明显下降,根治性手术病例术后无瘤生存时间、生存时间均略优于姑息手术病例,术后再次胆道梗阻发病率也低于姑息手术病例.结论 肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓病例通过适当的手术方式可以达到切除肿瘤、解除胆道梗阻的目的,根治性半肝切除术的疗效优于肝部分切除术.     

Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is influenced by parameters related to the tumor and the underlying liver disease. However, the extent of the resection, which can be limited or anatomical (including the tumor and its portal territory), is controversial. METHODS: Among 64 Child-Pugh A patients with cirrhosis who underwent curative liver resection for small HCC (< or = 4 cm) between 1990 and 1996, 34 patients underwent limited resection with a margin width of at least 1 cm, and 30 patients underwent anatomic resection of at least 1 liver segment with complete removal of the portal area containing the tumor. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of epidemiologic and pathologic parameters. The major end points were: (1) in-hospital mortality and morbidity; (2) overall and disease-free survival; and (3) rate and topography of recurrence. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality (6% vs 7%) and morbidity (52% vs 47%) rates after limited and anatomic liver resection were not statistically different. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates after limited versus anatomic resection were, respectively, 35% versus 54% (P <.05) and 6% versus 45% (P <.05). The 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were, respectively, 26% versus 45% and 0% versus 21% (P <.05). Local recurrence was more frequently observed after limited resections than after anatomic resections (50% vs 10%, P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis and a small HCC, anatomic resection achieves better disease-free survival than limited resection without increasing the postoperative risk. Therefore, anatomical resection should be the treatment of choice and considered as the reference surgical treatment compared with other treatments.     

No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients: is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach.

BACKGROUND: Low resectability rates and significant morbidity and mortality rates often make surgery for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) unfeasible. HYPOTHESIS: Our policy for surgical treatment of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with HCC is adequate and safe. DESIGN: Prospective validation cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred seven consecutive patients with HCCs. Associated cirrhosis was present in 64 (59.8%), and only 7 (6.5%) had normal livers. INTERVENTIONS: The presence of ascites, serum bilirubin level, and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes were considered when selecting patients for surgery. Preoperative recovery of liver function was achieved with portal venous branch embolization, liver volumetry, bed rest, and control of serum aminotransferase levels. The surgical techniques mainly involved bloodless dissection using intraoperative ultrasonography and intermittent warm ischemia. The main perioperative care regimen was fresh frozen plasma infusion and strict limitation of blood transfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates. RESULTS: All the patients underwent surgery (37 major resections, 45 segmentectomies, and 25 limited resections), with no 30-day postoperative mortality, overall morbidity of 26.2%, and no major complications. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that only the type of operation was associated with a significantly higher morbidity risk (P = .05). CONCLUSION: With high resectability, low morbidity, and no mortality, our policy represents a solution to the drawbacks of surgical resection for treatment of HCCs, especially in patients with associated liver cirrhosis.     

Alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis

HIGH INCIDENCE: Because of the high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis (3 to 5% per year) and the fact that curative treatment is currently available only for small sized tumors careful screening is warranted in this high risk population. Earlier screening attempts produced disappointing results in terms of cure and survival, particularly in Europe. Progress in ultrasonography, a better understanding of the risk of developing HCC, and most importantly the advent of local percutaneous treatments have greatly affected the data which should be reexamined. SCREENING METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis, particularly alcoholic or viral cirrhosis, should undergo regular ultrasound examinations, every six months for most screening protocols although the best timing remains unknown. Assay of serum alpha-fetoprotein is of limited use due to its low sensitivity and specificity. Diagnosis of HCC is basically based on helicoidal computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings, with or without pathological proof (ultrasound-guided biopsy) that may be difficult to obtain. A probabilistic diagnosis is therefore retained if necessary, based on the presence of risk factors and arterial hypervascularization of a liver nodule. EARLY TREATMENT: With ultrasound screening, the diagnosis of HCC can generally be established early, when curative transplantation, resection or local percutaneous destruction are still feasible. The percutaneous methods use chemical or physical agents to destroy the tumor. There are few contraindications so curative treatment can be proposed for large number of patients. Large-scale prospective studies will be completed in the upcoming years and are expected to provide evidence validating the principle of screening and early treatment.     

Use of the Floating Ball for hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma

Done to the improvement of knowledges in hepatic surgery and postoperative care, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been treated more and more frequently by hepatic resection. Aim of this study is to report an initial series of patients affected by HCC treated by hepatic resection utilizing a new water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device, the Tissuelink Monopolar Floating Ball (Tissuelink Medical Inc., Dover, NH, U.S.A.), in order to avoid bleeding during hepatic surgery. Sex, age, kind of disease, viral and Child status, type of surgical procedure, in association to lenght of surgical procedure, blood loss, utilization of the vascular clamping of the liver, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality have been analized. Six liver resections have been performed utilizing this new device. No vascular clamping was established except one. No mortality was recorded. Morbidity was ascites in one case and pleural effusion in a second one. In conclusion the Floating Ball reduces the intraoperative bleeding during hepatic resection in patients with HCC.     

Optimal Initial Treatment for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Preserved Liver Function: Transplantation or Resection?

Partial hepatic resection has been the mainstay of curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function. Liver transplantation for HCC was initially developed as a treatment option for patients with unresectable tumors associated with Child B or C cirrhosis. However, in recent years, some authors have advocated liver transplantation even for resectable early HCC associated with Child A cirrhosis. Whether transplantation or liver resection is the optimal initial treatment for early HCC in compensated cirrhosis depends on the survival results and also the availability of liver grafts. Recent studies comparing liver resection and transplantation for early HCC in Child A cirrhotic patients demonstrated similar long-term survival. While liver transplantation is associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate, this benefit is counteracted by long-term complications such as immunosuppression related infections and neoplasms. Patients put on transplantation waiting list run a significant risk of tumor progression and dropout, while liver resection is immediately applicable to all. A premature liver transplantation may expose patients to the side effects of immunosuppression earlier than necessary. With the current shortage of liver grafts, advocating primary liver transplantation for patients with early HCC associated with compensated cirrhosis will increase waiting time of transplantation and further increases the chance of dropout. Resection first and salvage transplantation for recurrent tumors or liver failure has been shown to be a feasible strategy in the majority of patients, and this appears to be the optimal strategy with the best use of organs.