Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract: a real disease?

Background:

Despite increasing numbers of reports, biliary tract intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BT-IPMN) is not yet recognized as a unique neoplasm. The aim of the present study was to define the presence of BT-IPMN in a large series of resected biliary neoplasms.

Methods:

From May 1994 to December 2006, BT-IPMN cases were identified by reviewing pathology specimens of all resected cholangiocarcinomas and other biliary neoplasms when cystic, papillary or mucinous features were cited in pathology reports.

Results:

BT-IPMN was identified in 23 out of 253 (9%) specimens using the strict histopathological criteria of IPMN. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal discomfort which was present in 15 patients (65%). Only one of the original operative pathology reports used the term IPMN; 16 (70%) used the terms cystic, mucinous and/or papillary. BT-IPMN was isolated to non-hilar extra-hepatic ducts in 12 (52%), intra-hepatic ducts in 6 (26%) and hilar extra-hepatic ducts in 5 patients (22%). Carcinoma was found in association with BT-IPMN in 19 patients (83%); 5-year survival was 38% after resection.

Conclusion:

BT-IPMN occurs throughout the intra- and extra-hepatic biliary system and can be identified readily as a unique neoplasm. Broader acceptance of BT-IPMN as a unique neoplasm may lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of biliary malignancies.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: is the puzzle solved?

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are drawing more attention and being detected more frequently. This review focuses on current understanding of the management of IPMN, regarding morphological classification, subclassification by cell lineage features, molecular abnormalities, radiological and imaging evaluation, progression to cancer, incidence and risk factors for malignancy, risk of distinct pancreatic adenocarcinoma and extrapancreatic malignancies, treatment strategy, and types of surgical resection. In particular, missing links in solving the IPMN puzzles are described with regard to differential diagnosis, role of cyst fluid analysis, multifocal IPMN, histological evaluation of the surgical specimen, observation without resection, follow up of patients after resection, role of adjuvant therapy for invasive carcinoma, screening for other neoplasms in patients with IPMN on follow up, prognostic factors influencing long-term outcomes, and role of endoscopic therapy.     

Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: to operate or not to operate?

BACKGROUND: Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) of the pancreas are reported to be less aggressive than the main-duct type. Hence, less aggressive treatment has been proposed for the former. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a follow-up protocol for BD-IPMNs. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: An academic tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: From 2000 to 2003, 109 patients with BD-IPMNs underwent trans-abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin. Patients who presented malignancy-related parameters (size >3.5 cm, nodules, thick walls, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 level >25 U/l, recent-onset or worsened diabetes) and/or complained of symptoms were submitted to surgery (arm A). All asymptomatic patients without suspicion of malignancy were followed up according to a 6-month clinical-radiological protocol (arm B). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness of conservative management of BD-IPMNs. RESULTS: 20 (18.3%) patients underwent surgery (arm A); pathological diagnosis of BD-IPMNs was always confirmed. 89 (81.7%) patients were followed up for a median of 32 months (arm B); of these, 57 (64%) patients had multifocal disease. After a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, 5 (5.6%) patients showed an increase in lesion size and underwent surgery. The pathological diagnosis was branch-duct adenoma in three patients and borderline adenoma in two. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is indicated in <20% of cases of BD-IPMNs, and, in the absence of malignancy-related parameters, careful non-operative management seems to be safe and effective in asymptomatic patients. Although observation for a longer time is needed to confirm these results, our findings support the guidelines recently recommended by the International Association of Pancreatology.     

Molecular genetics of intraductal papillary–mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary–mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas show characteristic clinicopathological and molecular pathobiological features which are distinct from those of conventional ductal adenocarcinomas. Alterations of KRAS, AKT/PKB, CDKN2A, TP53, SMAD4, STK11/LKB1, and DUSP6, and other molecular alterations, including global expression studies as well as their clinical implications, are discussed.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas – epidemiology,risk factors,diagnosis, and management

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is one of the most common cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. It is a heterogeneous disease and can be divided into ductal types and morphological subtypes. The incidence of IPMN is increasing, likely due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging and a growing elderly population. IPMN poses an increasing demand on the health care system. Current guidelines provide indications for surgery and recommendations for surveillance, but management of IPMN is still challenging in routine clinical practice. In this article, we review current knowledge about IPMN and provide future directions for improving diagnosis and management.     

Can the location of the mural nodule indicate benign or malignant in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas?

Background/ObjectivesIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are classified into main duct (MD)-type IPMNs, branch duct (BD)-type IPMNs, and mixed type IPMNs. While MD-type IPMN has a high risk of malignancy and should therefore be considered for resection if the patient is fit, BD-type IPMN needs to be carefully judged for surgical indication. The decision to resect BD-type IPMN is often based on international consensus Fukuoka guidelines 2017, but further investigation is required. In this study, we focused on whether the location of the mural nodule (MN) could be an indicator of malignancy.MethodsWe enrolled 17 cases who had been diagnosed BD-type IPMNs which were surgically resected from January 2016 to December 2019. These cases were classified into benign and malignant group. Subsequently, a clinicopathological study was conducted based on the localization of MN (MN-central type or MN-peripheral type).ResultsAlthough MN was found in 57% (4/11) in the benign group, 88% (7/8) was noted in the malignant group, indicating the presence of MN to be more common in the malignant group. Those with MN consisted of 6 cases of MN-central type and 5 cases of MN-peripheral type. All cases of central type were malignant compared to only one case of the peripheral group being confirmed on histology as cancer.ConclusionBD-IPMN with central mural nodule should be considered high risk for malignancy.     

Do consensus indications for resection in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm predict malignancy? A study of 147 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent consensus guidelines suggest that presence of > or =1 of the following is an indication for resection (IR) of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN-Br): cyst-related symptoms, main pancreatic duct diameter > or =10 mm, cyst size > or =30 mm, intramural nodules, or cyst fluid cytology suspicious/positive for malignancy. Among a cohort of patients with IPMN-Br we determined if the consensus IR (CIR), presence of multifocal IPMN-Br, or growth of cyst size on follow-up predict malignancy. METHODS: We identified 147 patients with IPMN-Br of whom 66 underwent surgical resection at diagnosis and 81 were followed conservatively, of whom 11 were resected during follow-up. Clinical, imaging, histological, and cyst fluid characteristics from all 147 patients with IPMN-Br were obtained from clinical records and/or by contacting the patients. In all cases, presence of CIR at baseline and during follow-up (N = 66), presence of multifocal cysts (N = 57), and increase in cyst size (N = 38) were noted. RESULTS: Among the 77 resected IPMN-Brs, at initial evaluation 61 had at least one CIR and 16 had none. Malignancy was present in 9/61 (15%) with CIR and 0/16 without IR (P= 0.1). When presence of any one of the CIR was taken as an indicator of malignancy, the CIR had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 23%, 14%, and 100%, respectively. Prevalence of malignancy in those with single versus multifocal IPMN-Br was similar (13%vs 11%). No patient has developed malignancy after a median follow-up of 15 months. So far, none of the 38 patients with increase in cyst size on follow-up has developed malignancy related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Suggested consensus indications for resection identify all patients with malignancy; however, their specificity is low. In the short term it would be safe to follow patients without these features.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas – a cost-effectiveness analysis of management strategies for the branch-duct subtype

Background

Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) presents a clinical conundrum. Rigorous long-term surveillance or surgical resection is recommended. The economic consequences of the management have not been fully investigated.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Does a family history of pancreatic cancer matter?

Background/ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare surgically resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) in patients with and without a family history of pancreatic cancer to gain insight into differences that may suggest the need for differential management.MethodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent resection of an IPMN at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1990–2011) was conducted. Three hundred and twenty-four patients of whom 45 (13.9%) had a family history of pancreatic cancer were identified. Patients with (PFH) and without (NFH) a family history of pancreatic cancer were compared.ResultsThere were no differences in demographic characteristics between groups. Extra-pancreatic malignancies diagnosed prior to the IPMN were more common in those with a PFH (35.6% vs 20.1%, p = 0.03). There were no differences in IPMN characteristics between groups including no difference in the presence of invasive disease (p = 0.55). Concurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas were more common in those with a PFH (11.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.02). The survival in the PFH group was marginally lower than the NFH group, a difference found to be attributable to the higher prevalence of extra-pancreatic malignancies.ConclusionCharacteristics of surgically resected IPMNs are not different between patients with and without a family history of pancreatic cancer. Most importantly, the incidence of invasive disease is not different, suggesting that these lesions may not be more aggressive when they occur in the presence of a family history of pancreatic cancer.     

Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreatic head/uncinate: resection or enucleation?

Introduction

Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreatic head/uncinate are an increasingly common indication for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, enucleation (EN) may be an alternative to PD in selected patients to improve outcomes and preserve pancreatic parenchyma.

Aim

To determine peri-operative outcomes in patients with side-branch IPMN of the pancreatic head/uncinate undergoing EN or PD compared with a cohort of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) undergoing PD.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected, combined, academic institutional series from 2005 to 2008. Of 107 pancreatic head/uncinate IPMN, enucleation was performed in 7 (IPMN EN) and PD was performed in 100 (IPMN PD) with 17 of these radiographically amenable to EN (IPMN PD^en). During the same time period, 281 patients underwent PD for PA (Control PD).

Results

Operative time was shorter (p < 0.05) and blood loss (p < 0.05) was less in the IPMN EN group compared with all other groups. Peri-operative mortality and morbidity of all IPMN groups (IPMN EN, IPMN PD^en) were similar to the Control PD group. Overall pancreatic fistulae rate in the IPMN EN group was higher than in the IPMN PD^en and Control PD groups; however, the rate of grade C pancreatic fistulae was the same in all groups.

Conclusions

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for side-branch IPMNs can be performed safely. Compared with PD, enucleation for IPMN has less blood loss, shorter operative time and similar morbidity, mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and readmission rate. Enucleation should be considered more frequently as an option for patients with unifocal side-branch IPMN.