Efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib plus S-1 versus regorafenib and fruquintinib for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundAt present, regorafenib and fruquintinib are the standard regimens for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients in China, but both options have limited efficacy. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib plus S-1 compared with regorafenib and fruquintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies.MethodsThe records of 114 patients with refractory mCRC in our center from April 2016 to September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 43 received apatinib 250 mg/day combined with S-1, 36 received regorafenib starting at 80 mg/day with weekly escalation, and 35 received fruquintinib 5 mg/day orally. Patients received radiographic examination every 1.5–2 months during the treatment period, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were analyzed and recorded.ResultsThe baseline clinical characteristics of the patients were broadly similar among the three groups. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–5.3] in the apatinib plus S-1 group, 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.9–4.2) in the fruquintinib group, and 2.4 months (95% CI: 2.1–2.7) in the regorafenib group, the mPFS of apatinib plus S-1 was significantly longer than that of regorafenib (HR =0.49, P=0.003) and fruquintinib (HR =0.60, P=0.048). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.4–11.0) in the apatinib plus S-1 group, 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.3–10.3) in the fruquintinib group, and 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.2–10.7) in the regorafenib group, which was comparable among the 3 groups. There was no statistical difference in disease control rate (DCR) among the three groups. Patients in the apatinib plus S-1 group had a higher incidence of hematological toxicity including anemia (62.8%), neutropenia (30.2%), and thrombocytopenia (39.5%), and the hand-foot skin reaction (58.3%) was more prevalent in the regorafenib group, while the adverse reaction of hypertension (45.7%) in the fruquintinib group was very significant.ConclusionsLow-dose apatinib plus S-1 prolonged PFS compared with regorafenib and fruquintinib, and is a potential alternative regimen for the treatment of refractory mCRC with tolerable and controlled toxicity.     

Local and systemic therapy of recurrent ependymoma in children and adolescents: short- and long-term results of the E-HIT-REZ 2005 study

BackgroundSurvival in recurrent ependymomas in children and adolescents mainly depends on the extent of resection. Studies on repeated radiotherapy and chemotherapy at relapse have shown conflicting results.MethodsUsing data from the German multi-center E-HIT-REZ-2005 study, we examined the role of local therapy and the efficacy of chemotherapy with blockwise temozolomide (TMZ) in children and adolescents with recurrent ependymomas.ResultsFifty-three patients with a median age of 6.9 years (1.25–25.4) at first recurrence and a median follow-up time of 36 months (2–115) were recruited. Gross- and near-total resection (GTR/NTR) were achieved in 34 (64.2%) patients and associated with a markedly improved 5-year overall survival (OS) of 48.7% vs. 5.3% in less than GTR/NTR. Radiotherapy showed no improvement in OS following complete resection (OS: 70 (CI: 19.9–120.1) vs. 95 (CI: 20.7–169.4) months), but an advantage was found in less than GTR/NTR (OS: 22 (CI: 12.7–31.3) vs. 7 (CI: 0–15.8) months). Following the application of TMZ, disease progression was observed in most evaluable cases (18/21). A subsequent change to oral etoposide and trofosfamide showed no improved response. PF-A EPN were most abundant in relapses (n = 27). RELA-positive EPN (n = 5) had a 5-year OS of 0%.ConclusionThe extent of resection is the most important predictor of survival at relapse. Focal re-irradiation is a useful approach if complete resection cannot be achieved, but no additional benefit was seen after GTR/NTR. Longer-term disease stabilization (>6 months) mediated by TMZ occurred in a small number of cases (14.3%).     

Multicenter phase II study of apatinib single or combination therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer involving chest wall metastasis

ObjectiveBreast cancer (BC) with chest wall metastasis (CWM) usually shows rich neovascularization. This trial explored the clinical effect of apatinib on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced BC involving CWM.MethodsThis trial involved four centers in China and was conducted from September 2016 to March 2020. Patients received apatinib 500 mg/d [either alone or with endocrine therapy if hormone receptor-positive (HR+)] until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.ResultsWe evaluated 26 patients for efficacy. The median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 [range: 2.0−28.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.1−8.3] months and 18 (range: 3−55; 95% CI: 12.9−23.1) months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 42.3% (11/26), and the disease-control rate was 76.9% (20/26). In the subgroup analysis, HR+ patients compared with HR-negative patients had significantly improved mPFS of 7.0 (95% CI: 2.2−11.8) monthsvs. 2.3 (95% CI: 1.2−3.4) months, respectively (P=0.001); and mPFS in patients without or with chest wall radiotherapy was 6.4 (95% CI: 1.6−19.5) monthsvs. 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3−4.6) months, respectively (P=0.041). In the multivariate analysis, HR+ status was the only independent predictive factor for favorable PFS (P=0.014). ConclusionsApatinib was highly effective for BC patients with CWM, especially when combined with endocrine therapy. PFS improved significantly in patients with HR+ status who did not receive chest wall radiotherapy. However, adverse events were serious and should be carefully monitored from the beginning of apatinib treatment.     

Final results of the CAVE trial in RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab plus avelumab as rechallenge therapy: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival

BackgroundHigh neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we provide final results of CAVE mCRC trial, of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge in chemo-refractory mCRC patients and investigated the predictive role of NLR.MethodsAll the 77 patients enrolled were included in the analysis. A cut-off of 3 was used to correlate baseline NLR with with overall survival (OS) and with progression free survival (PFS), in intention to treat (ITT) and in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS/BRAF Wild Type (WT) patients.ResultsIn ITT population, NLR <3 (49%) group had median overall survival (mOS) of 17.8 months, vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥ 3 group (51%) [HR 0.50, (CI 95% 0.3-0.8), P = .006]. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was 3.9 months in NLR <3 group and 3.5 months in NLR≥3 [HR 0.79, (CI 95% 0.5-1.24), P = .3]. In ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT population, mOS was 22 months in NLR <3 group (48%), vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥3 group (52%), [HR 0.38, (CI 95% 0.19-0.75), P = .005]. A trend towards increased mPFS was observed in patients with NLR <3 versus NLR ≥3: 5.3 vs. 3.6 months [HR: 0.79, (CI 95% 0.44-1.4), P = .43]. In contrast, NLR did not correlate either with PFS or OS in ctDNA RAS/BRAF mutated patients.ConclusionIn the exploratory analysis of the CAVE mCRC trial, baseline NLR <3 significantly correlated with improved survival and may represent a potential predictive biomarker of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge activity in ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT patients, that must be confirmed in randomized studies.     

转移性结直肠癌一线化疗稳定与有效的患者无生存差异分析

  目的  旨在探讨转移性结直肠癌患者一线化疗后不同疗效分组的生存差异, 以期更好地指导化疗方案的选择。  方法  研究纳入了接受一线化疗的232例复发转移性结直肠癌患者, 按化疗最佳疗效先后分为疾病未进展与疾病进展组, 化疗有效与疾病稳定组, 分别比较两组患者的生存差异, 并分析影响总生存的独立预后因素。  结果  全组患者中位总生存时间(mOS)为21.10个月, 中位无进展生存时间(mPFS)为9.17个月。一线化疗疾病未进展组与进展组的mOS分别为23.57个月和10.67个月, mPFS分别为10.83个月和2.83个月, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。疾病稳定组与化疗有效组的mOS分别为23.57个月和24.30个月, mPFS分别为10.57个月和10.87个月, 差异均无统计学意义(P=0.935, P=0.985)。原发病灶是否根治性切除、病理分级、复发转移病灶局部处理、化疗后疾病进展情况是影响总生存的独立预后因素。  结论  复发转移性结直肠癌患者接受一线化疗后, 疾病进展时有必要更换化疗方案, 而近期疗效获得稳定的患者则无需更换化疗方案。      

EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20-ins) mutations are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), resistant to conventional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Characteristics and outcomes of patients with EGFR ex20-ins have not been fully established; we sought to clarify them using a multinational patient database.Patients and MethodsPatients with NSCLC from six Australian institutions with EGFR exon 20 mutations (ex20-mut), excluding T790M, were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes with systemic treatments were collected and analyzed using comparative statistics.ResultsAmong 109 patients with ex20-mut, 61% were females and 75% were Caucasians. More males presented with de novo metastatic disease (84% vs. 51%; P = .002). Central nervous system (48%) and liver (24%) metastases were common within metastatic patients (n = 86). Thirty-nine patients received platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and achieved a 43% objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.9 months, and median overall survival (mOS) of 31.0 months. Twenty-three of the patients with ex20-ins received conventional TKIs, resulting in an ORR of 13%, mPFS of 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-6.25), and mOS of 31.0 months (95% CI, 15.09-not reached). Nine patients with S786I mutations received TKIs, resulting in an ORR of 50%, mPFS of 18.2 months (2.79-not reached), and mOS of 33.4 months (95% CI, 16.14-not reached). Twenty-three patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (ICIm), resulting in an ORR of 4%, mPFS of 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.91-4.83), and mOS of 30.8 months (95% CI, 17.62-41.62).ConclusionAlthough phenotypically similar to patients with common EGFR mutations, patients with EGFR ex20-mut had worse survival, perhaps due to the lack of targeted therapies. Chemotherapy was superior to conventional EGFR TKIs in patients with EGFR ex20-ins, although there was moderate activity of TKIs in S768I mutations. ICIm was ineffective.     

Apatinib in Combination with S-1 as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results from an Open,Exploratory, Single-Arm,Phase II Trial

Lessons Learned

• Apatinib combined with S‐1 was not superior to other chemotherapy regimens as first‐line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.
• There was a tendency for patients with lymph node metastasis to have prolonged median progression‐free survival and median overall survival, compared with patients with liver metastasis.

BackgroundThe best choice of first‐line chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic gastric cancer is still debated. We combined apatinib and S‐1 as a new first‐line therapy to treat advanced gastric cancer. The efficacy and safety of the combination were assessed, with the goal of determining the most appropriate subgroup of patients who could benefit from this new regimen.MethodsThis study was an open, exploratory single‐arm, phase II trial. Enrolled patients received apatinib plus S‐1 treatment (apatinib, 500 mg, once a day [qd], days 1–21; S‐1, 40 mg/m², bid, days 1–14). The primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and safety of this new regimen. Next‐generation sequencing was used to explore potential biomarkers.ResultsA total of 30 patients were enrolled. The median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 4.21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29–6.13 months). The median overall survival (mOS) was 7.49 months (95% CI, 4.81–10.17 months). Patients with lymph node metastasis had prolonged mPFS and mOS when compared with those with liver metastasis (mPFS, 4.21 vs. 1.84 months; mOS, 8.21 vs. 6.31 months, p = .08). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were abdominal pain, dizziness, and diarrhea. Gene mutation profiles between the two subgroups were significantly different.ConclusionApatinib combined with S‐1 was not superior to other chemotherapy regimens as first‐line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Toxicity was consistent with known profiles when given as monotherapy. There was a tendency toward prolonged mPFS and mOS in patients with lymph node metastasis compared with patients with liver metastasis, which could support the need to design a future clinical trial with a better defined patient population.     

Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer

BackgroundAlthough surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes.ResultsForty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3–73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22–50%), 20% (95% CI: 11–36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2–20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12–36%), 27% (95% CI: 17–44%), 31% (95% CI: 20–48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22–50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy₁₀ was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18–0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16–0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02–1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy₁₀ remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15–0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively.ConclusionsRT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.     

Osimertinib Improves Overall Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Leptomeningeal Metastases Regardless of T790M Mutational Status

IntroductionOsimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, efficiently penetrates the blood-brain barrier. This study explored whether treatment with osimertinib leads to improved overall survival (OS) for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) compared with those not treated with osimertinib.MethodsFrom October 2008 to October 2019, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM were retrospectively analyzed for OS according to osimertinib treatment and T790M mutational status. The OS was defined as the time from the diagnosis of LM to death.ResultsFor the 351 patients with LM included in the analysis, the median OS (mOS) was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.2–9.0). T790M mutation was detected in 88 of 197 patients tested, and a total of 110 patients were treated with osimertinib after LM. No difference in mOS according to T790M mutational status (10.1 mo [95% CI: 4.31–15.82] versus 9.0 [95% CI: 6.81–11.21], p = 0.936) was found. Nevertheless, patients treated with osimertinib had a superior OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 15.13–18.94) compared with those not treated with osimertinib who had a mOS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.34–6.63), regardless of T790M mutational status (hazard ratio: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.28–0.47], p < 0.001). This was also considerably longer even than the mOS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.01–10.39) of those who were never treated with osimertinib but had first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.ConclusionsOsimertinib is a promising treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM regardless of T790M mutational status.     

The relationship between treatment-induced hypertension and efficacy of anlotinib in recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective:In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated anlotinib treatment-induced hypertension as a potential predictive factor of efficacy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.Methods:A total of 109 patients enrolled in the anlotinib group in a phase 2 trial were included. The tumor response was assessed by computed tomography at week 3, week 6, and then every 6 weeks until progressive disease was observed. The primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).Results:In all patients, the median PFS was 3.02 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.63–3.65 months] and the OS was 6.11 months (95% CI: 4.40–7.79 months). The ORR was 7.34% (95% CI: 3.22%–13.95%). A total of 59 (54%) patients were diagnosed with treatment-induced hypertension (Group A), and the remaining patients (n = 50, 46%) were in Group B. Baseline prognostic factors were similar between the 2 groups. Patients in Group A had a longer PFS and OS and higher ORR. When stratifying patients using a previously known history of hypertension, treatment-induced hypertension was a predictor only for patients without previous hypertension, who had longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.68] and OS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.21–0.67).Conclusions:We showed, for the first time, a correlation between treatment-induced hypertension and better prognoses in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients treated with anlotinib, without a previously known history of hypertension. Treatment-induced hypertension may be a simple and low cost predictor for anlotinib antitumor efficacy in these patients, which may also reflect the intended target inhibition.     

Differential Efficacy of Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Metastatic Cancers

BackgroundThe recommended first-line chemotherapy for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is bevacizumab (BEV)-containing therapy for right-sided colon cancer (R) and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody (anti-EGFR)-containing therapy for left-sided colon cancer (L) or rectal cancer (RE). However, anatomical or biological heterogeneity reportedly exists between L and RE. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies for L and RE, respectively.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 265 patients with KRAS (RAS)/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR or BEV as the first-line treatment at a single institution. They were divided into 3 groups: R, L, and RE. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and conversion surgery rate were analyzed.ResultsForty-five patients had R (anti-EGFR/BEV: 6/39), 137 patients had L (45/92), and 83 patients had RE (25/58). In patients with R, both median (m) PFS and OS were superior with BEV therapy (mPFS, anti-EGFR vs. BEV: 8.7 vs. 13.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.90, P = .01; mOS, 17.1 vs. 33.9 months, HR: 1.54, P = .38). In patients with L, better mPFS and comparable mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 20.0 vs. 13.4 months, HR: 0.68, P = .08; mOS, 44.8 vs. 36.0 months, HR: 0.87, P = .53), whereas, in patients with RE, comparable mPFS and worse mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 17.2 vs. 17.8 months, HR: 1.08, P = .81; mOS, 29.1 vs. 42.2 months, HR: 1.53, P = .17).ConclusionsEfficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies may differ between patients with L and RE.     

Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and very high PD-L1 expression

BackgroundIn non-small-cell lung cancers with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on ≥50% of tumor cells, first-line treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab improves survival compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Whether higher PD-L1 levels within the expression range of 50%–100% predict for even greater benefit to pembrolizumab is currently unknown.Patients and methodsIn this multicenter retrospective analysis, we analyzed the impact of PD-L1 expression levels on the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients who received commercial pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and negative for genomic alterations in the EGFR and ALK genes.ResultsAmong 187 patients included in this analysis, the ORR was 44.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.1% to 51.8%], the mPFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 4.5–8.5), and the mOS was not reached. The median PD-L1 expression level among patients who experienced a response to pembrolizumab was significantly higher than among patients with stable or progressive disease (90% versus 75%, P < 0.001). Compared with patients with PD-L1 expression of 50%–89% (N = 107), patients with an expression level of 90%–100% (N = 80) had a significantly higher ORR (60.0% versus 32.7%, P < 0.001), a significantly longer mPFS [14.5 versus 4.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.33–0.74), P < 0.01], and a significantly longer mOS [not reached versus 15.9 months, HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.21–0.70), P = 0.002].ConclusionAmong patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 expression of ≥50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab, clinical outcomes are significantly improved in NSCLCs with a PD-L1 expression of ≥90%. These findings have implications for treatment selection as well as for clinical trial interpretation and design.     

Survival and prognostic factors for postoperative primary appendiceal cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on the Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results database

BackgroundThe factors affecting the postoperative survival of patients with primary appendiceal cancer (PAC) have yet to be fully explored. And there are no clear guidelines for adjuvant treatment after appendectomy. Whether chemotherapy can prolong patient survival after appendectomy, is critical in guiding postoperative medications. The majority of studies on appendiceal cancer are single case reports, and they focused on the incidence of appendiceal cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the survival characteristics of patients with primary appendiceal cancer after surgery using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsThe data of 2,891 cases of primary appendiceal cancer between 2004 to 2015 were obtained from the SEER database and subjected to survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards model. The annual percentage change (APC) was calculated using the weighted least squares method.ResultsThe overall age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 population steadily increased from 0.58 in 2004 to 1.63 in 2015. For patients who received chemotherapy, the median overall survival (OS) was 65 months and the 5-year OS rate was 51.9%, and for patients who did not receive chemotherapy or whose chemotherapy status was unknown, the median OS was not reached and the 5-year OS rate was 78.9%. Age [35< age <69: hazard radio (HR) =2.147; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.442–3.197, P<0.001; age >69: HR =5.259; 95% CI: 3.485–7.937, P<0.001], race (White race: HR =0.728; 95% CI: 0.590–0.899, P=0.003), histologic type (mucinous neoplasm: HR =0.690; 95% CI: 0.580–0.821, P<0.001; malignant carcinoid: HR =0.657; 95% CI: 0.536–0.806, P<0.001), grade (II: HR =1.794; 95% CI: 1.471–2.187, P<0.001; III: HR =2.905; 95% CI: 2.318–3.640, P<0.001; IV: HR =3.128; 95% CI: 2.159–4.533, P<0.001), and stage (localized: HR =0.236; 95% CI: 0.194–0.287, P<0.001; regional: HR =0.425; 95% CI: 0.362–0.499, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of survival. And after adjusting for known factors (age, sex, race, tumor size, marital status, histologic type, grade, stage), chemotherapy (HR =1.220; 95% CI: 1.050–1.417, P=0.009) was revealed to be an independent indicator of poor prognosis.ConclusionsThere was an increasing trend in the incidence of appendiceal cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2015. Chemotherapy was revealed to be an independent indicator of poor prognosis, which provide valuable insight into the therapy of primary appendiceal cancer. Large clinical trials of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for appendiceal cancer are urgently needed.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: results from a phase I study

BackgroundRadiotherapy may synergize with programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PD-L1) blockade. The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose, safety/tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of combining pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, with hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HFSRT) and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs).MethodsEligible subjects with recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma were treated with pembrolizumab (100 or 200 mg based on dose level Q3W) concurrently with HFSRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions) and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W.ResultsThirty-two patients were enrolled (bevacizumab-naïve, n = 24; bevacizumab-resistant, n = 8). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were proteinuria (40.6%), fatigue (25%), increased alanine aminotransferase (25%), and hypertension (25%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 1 patient who experienced a grade 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase. In the bevacizumab-naïve cohort, 20 patients (83%) had a complete response or partial response. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13.45 months (95% CI: 9.46–18.46) and 7.92 months (95% CI: 6.31–12.45), respectively. In the bevacizumab-resistant cohort, PR was achieved in 5 patients (62%). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.97–18.86) with a median PFS of 6.54 months (95% CI: 5.95–18.86). The majority of patients (n = 20/26; 77%) had tumor-cell/tumor-microenvironment PD-L1 expression <1%.ConclusionsThe combination of HFSRT with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent HGG is generally safe and well tolerated. These findings merit further investigation of HFSRT with immunotherapy in HGGs.     

Influence of first line chemotherapy strategy depending on primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundPrimary tumor location (PTL) is a major prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with left side which present better prognosis than right sided. Uncertainty exists regarding comparative effectiveness of irinotecan or oxaliplatin doublet in mCRC in function of PTL.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective comparing clinical outcomes from both regimens in function of sidedness. Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC candidates to first-line chemotherapy were selected. Clinical outcomes were assessed and stratified by tumor location (left, right and rectal) and type of treatment.ResultsOverall, 702 patients met the inclusion criteria. Primary colon cancer was right-sided in 248 (35.3%) patients, left-sided in 296 (42.2%) and rectal in 158 (22.5%) patients. Whatever PTL monochemotherapy give poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Triplet give better PFS and OS only for rectal cancer. When looking at doublet in first line. Folinic acid, 5FU, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) give better PFS in rectal cancer [PFS of 21.2 (95% CI: 14.9–NR) versus 12.2 (95% CI: 10.1–13.4) months for the folinic acid, 5FU, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) group, P=0.009] and at trend for better PFS in right side tumor [14.9 (95% CI: 8.8–20.8) versus 11.3 (95% CI: 8.4–13.2) months for the FOLFOX group. P=0.0755]. No difference was observed in term of OS.Conclusionsour results support that either FOLFIRI or FOLFOX regimens give similar efficacy in both left and right metastatic colic cancer. FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX regimens might be preferred for metastatic rectal carcinoma.     

Survival benefit of Boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent malignant gliomas

We have applied boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) to malignant brain tumors. Here we evaluated the survival benefit of BNCT for recurrent malignant glioma (MG). Since 2002, we have treated 22 cases of recurrent MG with BNCT. Survival time was analyzed with special reference to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification, by Carson et al. (J Clin Oncol 25:2601-2606, 2007). Median survival times (MSTs) after BNCT for all patients and for glioblastoma as on-study histology at recurrence was 10.8 months (n = 22; 95% CI, 7.3-12.8 months) and 9.6 months (n = 19; 95% CI, 6.9-11.4 months), respectively. In our study, MST for the high-risk RPA classes was 9.1 months (n = 11; 95% CI, 4.4-11.0 months). By contrast, the original journal data showed that the MST of the same RPA classes was 4.4 months (n = 129; 95% CI, 3.6-5.4 months). BNCT showed a survival benefit for recurrent MG, especially in the high-risk group.     

Outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant three-week course chemoradiotherapy using capecitabine-based versus gemcitabine-based concurrent chemotherapy

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can provide downstaging and improve margin negativity for borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma [(B)RPC]. Little is known about the relative efficacy of capecitabine (CAPE)-based vs. gemcitabine (GEM)-based 3-week chemoradiation (3WCRT) with 36 Gy in 15 fractions. This study aimed to compare the odds of achieving surgical resection, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 3WCRT with concurrent CAPE versus GEM.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining medical records from a single center for patients with (B)RPC treated with 3WCRT between 1/2009–12/2020. Odd ratios (OR) of achieving surgical resection were estimated using logistic regression for univariable and multivariable analyses. Median TTP (mTTP) and median OS (mOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of progression and survival in univariable and multivariable analyses.ResultsThirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (71%) patients were treated with CAPE, while 9 (29%) were treated with GEM. All patients in the GEM group were borderline resectable, vs. 18 (82%) patients in the CAPE group, P=0.30. Nineteen (86%) patients in the CAPE group were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, vs. 4 (44%) patients in the GEM group, P=0.03. The CAPE group had higher odds of achieving surgical resection [OR =9.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50–58.20]. Adjusting for covariates, the odds of achieving surgical resection were still statistically higher in the CAPE group vs. the GEM group (OR =25.34; 95% CI: 1.14–563.72). The CAPE group had superior mTTP compared to the GEM group (15.4 months, 95% CI: 4.9–71.1 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI: 0.4–14.5; P=0.01), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14–0.81). Adjusting for covariates this effect persisted; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for progression was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08–0.77). Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated that the CAPE group had superior OS compared to the GEM group in unadjusted (HR =0.13; 95% CI: 0.04–0.40) and adjusted models (HR =0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.52).ConclusionsFor neoadjuvant 3WCRT, this hypothesis-generating study suggests concurrent CAPE may be a more effective radiosensitizer than GEM for patients with (B)RPC.     

Significance of targeted therapy and genetic alterations in EGFR,ALK, or KRAS on survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy for brain metastases

BackgroundWe determined the impact of genetic alterations in EGFR, ALK, or KRAS on survival after radiotherapy for brain metastases in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsOf 172 genotyped NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy for brain metastases in 2005–2012, 54 had cancers with EGFR mutations, 12 had ALK rearrangements, 38 had KRAS mutations, and 68 were wild-type (WT). Overall survival (OS) was determined.ResultsMedian follow-up was 8.6 months. Median OS was 13.6 months for patients with EGFR mutations and 26.3 months for patients with ALK rearrangements, in contrast to 5.7 months for KRAS-mutant patients and 5.5 months for WT patients (P = .001). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for receipt of targeted therapy after cranial radiotherapy, ALK rearrangements were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74; P = .008). EGFR mutations were not significantly associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37–1.38; P = .3). KRAS mutations were also not associated with improved OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.59–1.47; P = .8). Receipt of targeted therapy after cranial radiotherapy was independently associated with improved OS (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17–0.54; P < .001). Receipt of chemotherapy after cranial radiotherapy, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, age, and performance status were also associated with OS.ConclusionsNSCLC patients with genetic alterations in ALK have improved survival outcomes after radiotherapy for brain metastases compared with EGFR, KRAS, or WT. Subsequent receipt of targeted therapy was associated with additional improvement in OS.     

Phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma

BackgroundPanobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with antineoplastic and antiangiogenic effects in glioma that may work synergistically with bevacizumab. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of panobinostat combined with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG).MethodsPatients with recurrent HGG were treated with oral panobinostat 30 mg 3 times per week, every other week, in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week. The primary endpoint was a 6-month progression-fee survival (PFS6) rate for participants with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) were evaluated as an exploratory arm of the study.ResultsAt interim analysis, the GBM arm did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM arm was closed. A total of 24 patients with GBM were accrued prior to closure. The PFS6 rate was 30.4% (95%, CI 12.4%–50.7%), median PFS was 5 months (range, 3–9 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (range, 6–19 months). Accrual in the AG arm continued to completion, and a total of 15 patients were enrolled. The PFS6 rate was 46.7% (range, 21%–73%), median PFS was 7 months (range, 2–10 months), and median OS was 17 months (range, 5 months–27 months).ConclusionsThis phase II study of panobinostat and bevacizumab in participants with recurrent GBM did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM cohort of the study was closed. Although it was reasonably well tolerated, the addition of panobinostat to bevacizumab did not significantly improve PFS6 compared with historical controls of bevacizumab monotherapy in either cohort.     

Prognostic value of complete metabolic response on 18F-FDG-PET/CT after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer

ObjectiveWe investigated the prognostic value of complete metabolic response (CMR) on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) after 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC).MethodsPET/CT at baseline and after 3 cycles of NAC were performed; peak standardized uptakes were measured. PET parameters were compared with NAC parameter: cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) normalization before interval debulking surgery (IDS) and chemotherapy response score (CRS) to predict platinum-sensitivity. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine correlations between PET parameters and survival. Prognostic factors were obtained by multivariate Cox regression analysis.ResultsBetween 2007 and 2020, 102 patients were recruited: 19 (18.6%) were designated as CMR group and 83 (81.4%) as non-CMR group. CMR after 3 cycles of NAC showed the highest accuracy in predicting platinum-sensitivity (area under the curve [AUC]=0.729; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.552–0.823; p=0.017), compared with CA-125 normalization before IDS (AUC=0.626; 95% CI=0.542–0.758; p=0.010) and CRS (AUC=0.613; 95% CI=0.490–0.735; p=0.080). CMR demonstrated better prognosis than non-CMR in progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS, 23.9 months vs. 16.4 months; p=0.021) and overall survival (OS) (median OS, not reached vs. 69.7 months; p=0.025). In multivariate analysis, CMR was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.50; 95% CI=0.27–0.92; p=0.027) and death (aHR=0.23; 95% CI=0.05–0.99; p=0.048).ConclusionCMR after 3 cycles of NAC can be a prognostic factor for both recurrence and death in advanced HGSC.