IgA antiendomysial antibody test

Serum IgA antiendomysial antibodies (EmA) were found in 61 (87%) of 70 adults and children with untreated celiac disease, whereas IgA antigliadin antibodies (AGA) and IgA R1-antireticulin antibodies (R1-ARA) were positive in 71% and 47%, respectively, of the same patients. Two of the nine untreated celiacs negative for IgA EmA showed positivity for IgA AGA. While IgA AGA and R1-ARA disappeared in all the celiacs tested one year after gluten-free diet, IgA EmA persisted at low titer in seven (18%) of these 38 subjects, although the jejunal biopsy showed a complete regrowth of jejunal villi. All the disease control patients as well as the blood donors tested were always negative for the three IgA antibodies. Our results state that the search for both IgA EmA and AGA gives the best results in the screening of celiac disease, since the positivity for at least one of these two antibodies allows identification with a 100% specificity of the 90% of untreated celiac patients.     

IgA antibodies to jejunum

Serum IgA antibodies to jejunum (JAB) were found in 78 (96%) of 81 adults and children with untreated celiac disease. Not only did IgA JAB display a significant higher prevalence than IgA antigliadin antibodies (AGA) (72%) in untreated gluten-sensitive enteropathy, but they also allowed us to identify another three celiacs in addition to those detected by IgA antiendomysial antibodies (EmA). Like IgA EmA, IgA JAB persisted at low titer in seven (14%) of 50 celiacs tested after 12 months of gluten-free diet (GFD) despite the regrowth of jejunal villi, whereas IgA AGA disappeared in all these patients consistently with the normalization of intestinal mucosa. IgA JAB and EmA reappearance was close to 100% in the 13 celiacs studied after six months of gluten challenge, while IgA AGA reached the highest prevalence (about 70%) after one month of gluten ingestion without any increase in the following months. All disease and healthy controls were always negative for the three IgA antibodies. Our results prove that IgA JAB and EmA are the best screening tests for active (untreated and on gluten challenge) celiac disease, whereas IgA AGA should be used for monitoring the response to gluten withdrawal. IgA JAB are an expression of a specific immunity directed against the target organ of gluten-sensitive enteropathy, but, before ascribing them a role in the pathogenesis of celiac disease, it should be ascertained whether their production is a primary event leading to jejunal lesions or whether it is a secondary phenomenon due to antigen release from a previously damaged jejunal mucosa.     

IgA Antiendomysial Antibodies on the Umbilical Cord in Diagnosing Celiac Disease Sensitivity,Specificity, and Comparative Evaluation with the Traditional Kit

Background: The possibility of assaying antiendomysial antibodies (EmA) on the human umbilical cord instead of monkey esophagus has recently been suggested. We therefore evaluated in patients with celiac disease (CD) the sensitivity and specificity of EmA and of antigliadin antibodies (AGA) for both umbilical cord and monkey esophagus. Methods: We studied 36 patients with CD and atrophy of the intestinal mucosa (median age, 1.4 years), 14 patients with CD on gluten-free diet for 8–12 months (median age, 3.0 years), 36 controls without gastrointestinal disease (median age, 4.0 years), and 72 patients with cow's milk protein enteropathy (CMPE) (median age, 1.2 years). AGA and EmA on monkey esophagus were assayed with commercially available kits; the slides with umbilical cord were prepared in our laboratory. Results: There was a perfect concordance between EmA results evaluated on umbilical cord and those on monkey esophagus; there was a doubtful result in only one case on human umbilical cord, which was positive with low liter on monkey esophagus. EmA specificity was 100%; the specificity of AGA IgG varied between 72% and 94% and of AGA IgA between 90% and 100% depending on whether controls without gastrointestinal disorders or patients with CMPE were considered. EmA sensitivity was 97%, AGA IgG was 89%, and AGA IgA 72% sensitive. The only false negative for EmA was positive for AGA IgG and AGA IgA. Conclusions: Using human umbilical cord as a substrate for EmA may provide the same sensitivity and specificity as offered by the test using monkey esophagus substrate, thus reducing costs and avoiding the use of endangered species.     

Prevalence of celiac disease in Iranian children with idiopathic short stature

AIM： To determine the prevalence of celiac disease （CD） in children with idiopathic short stature （ISS） and the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin （Ig） A G antigliadin antibodies （AGA） and transglutaminase （TTG） antibodies for CD.METHODS： A total of 104 children （49 male, 55 female） with ISS without a specific etiology were studied. Extensive endocrine investigations had shown no abnormalities in any subject. Anthropometric parameters and IgA AGA and IgA TTG antibodies were evaluated in this study group. These antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All patients were referred for an endoscopic intestinal biopsy. The biopsy samples were classified according to revised Marsh criteria （UEGW 2001）.RESULTS： We detected positive IgA TTG antibodies in 36 and IgA AGA in 35 of these patients. Thirty one IgA TTG antibody positive and 28 IgA AGA positive subjects showed histological abnormalities compatible with celiac disease （33.6%）. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value （PPV） and negative predictive value for IgA AGA were found to be 80%, 88.4%, 77.8% and 89.7%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and PPV for IgA TTG antibodies were 88.6%, 94.2% and 88.6%, espectively.CONCLUSION： We conclude that the prevalence of celiac disease is high in patients with ISS and it is important to test all children with ISS for celiac disease by measuring serologic markers and performing an intestinal biopsy.     

Activation of Genes for Superoxide Dismutase,Interleukin-1ß, Tumor Necrosis Factor-a,and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 during Healing of Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Gastric Injury

The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of IgA endomysium antibodies (EmA) and IgA gliadin antibodies (AGA) for coeliac disease (CD) were studied in Swedish children. Indirect immunofluorescence was used for demonstration of EmA and the diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for AGA. Serum samples were collected and analysed from 77 consecutive children undergoing small-intestinal biopsy on recognized clinical indications. The diagnostic sensitivity for CD was 98.1% for EmA and 86.5% for AGA. The specificity of the two tests was 92.7% for EmA and 92.7% for AGA in paediatric patients. In addition, 115 sera from control children showed 2.6% positive for EmA and (1.9% positive for AGA.     

Immunochromatographic sticks for tissue transglutaminase and antigliadin antibody screening in celiac disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated two 1-step immunochromatographic visual assays based on human recombinant tissue-transglutaminase (t-TG) as an alternative to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for celiac disease (CD) screening. METHODS: We used a tissue-transglutaminase (t-TG) stick, which detected immunoglobulin A/G (IgA/G) antibodies to t-TG, and a t-TG/antigliadin antibodies (AGA) stick, which detected IgA antibodies to both t-TG and AGA, as well as t-TG and AGA ELISAs, to determine t-TG and AGA antibodies in untreated celiac patients with subtotal villous atrophy. A total of 142 children (3 IgA-deficient sera) and 30 adults, and 140 controls (normal mucosa; 121 children and 19 adults), plus 23 sera from pediatric CD patients in remission were assayed. RESULTS: For pediatric patients, with the t-TG stick we obtained a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 99.0%, and in adults, 83.3% and 100%, respectively. The t-TG/AGA stick displayed a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 99.0% for t-TG and a sensitivity of 89.2% and a specificity of 95.8% for AGA in children, and a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% for t-TG and a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 100% for AGA in adults. Results were comparable with the corresponding ELISAs. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 visual assays are efficient for CD screening as an alternative to ELISAs. They are simple to handle and to interpret. By the combined use of the 2 sticks, IgA-deficient patients can be identified as positive in the t-TG (IgG/A) but negative in the t-TG/AGA (IgA) stick.     

The natural history of gluten sensitivity: report of two new celiac disease patients resulting from a long-term follow-up of nonatrophic, first-degree relatives

OBJECTIVE: Early studies revealed that up to 50% of non-atrophic, first-degree relatives of celiac disease patients exhibit features of gluten sensitivity. However, whether these features progress to a fully expressed celiac disease remain partially known. Our aim was to report two new patients resulting from a prospective, long-term surveillance of relatives who were nonatrophic at initial assessment. METHODS: After a median time of 86 months (range: 42-102 months) from the baseline assessment, we re-evaluated 44 first-degree relatives of propositi who had taken part in family studies and in whom baseline small intestinal biopsies were normal. At the baseline screening, 21 relatives had positive serum antigliadin antibodies and/or increased intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltration, and 23 did not. In addition, 11 of 18 had a celiac-like response to rectal gluten challenge and 16 of 34 possessed the characteristic HLA DQ2 haplotype (DQA1 0501 DQB1 0201). Re-evaluation was based on celiac-related serology antigliadin (AGA) and endomysial (EmA) antibodies. EmA-positive subjects underwent intestinal biopsy. RESULTS: At the end of the study, EmA was positive in only two subjects. Histological examination revealed flat small bowel mucosa in both. At baseline, both cases were EmA-negative and no minor histological changes were observed. One was a woman with positive baseline IgA and IgG AGA and a rectal gluten challenge with a celiac-like response; the other patient has presented only with a positive IgG AGA. In both cases, progression was detected in a clinically silent context. Both new patients had the characteristic HLA DQ2 haplotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the need to re-evaluate relatives who have been negative on initial screening for celiac disease. Up to now, the progression to severe enteropathy was only observed in relatives who had presented some evidence of gluten sensitivity and the characteristic HLA DQ2 haplotype. Longer longitudinal studies are necessary to obtain definitive conclusions.     

Prevalence of celiac disease in Argentina: screening of an adult population in the La Plata area

OBJECTIVES: Up to now, the epidemiological characteristic of celiac disease among adults in South America remains unknown. The present prospective screening was designed to determine the prevalence of celiac disease in adults from the general population in an urban area of Argentina. METHODS: Between January. 1998, and May, 2000, all couples attending a centralized laboratory for an obligatory prenuptial examination in the La Plata area were offered participation in a screening program for celiac disease. The study included 2000 subjects (996 women; median age 29 yr, range 16-79 yr). All individuals completed a clinical questionnaire at the time that serum samples were obtained. A three-step screening protocol was used, as follows: 1) all samples were tested for antigliadin antibodies (AGAs) (type IgA and IgG); 2) samples that were IgA AGA positive were tested for antiendomysial antibody (EmA type IgA); samples that were positive for AGA-G but negative for IgA AGAs were tested for total IgA serum levels and EmA type IgG; and 3) subjects who were EmA-positive were referred for intestinal biopsy. RESULTS: At the end of the screening we detected 10 subjects who were EmA-A positive and two others who were IgA-deficient (both were EmA-G positive). Up to now, 11 of the 12 subjects (including nine EmA-positive and two IgA-deficient subjects) had endoscopic intestinal biopsies showing the characteristic celiac histology. The remaining EmA-positive individual was considered to be affected by celiac disease. The overall prevalence assessed was 1:167 (6.0 x 1000 subjects; 95% CI = 3.1-10.5). Eight of the 12 (67%) subjects were female (1:124; 8.0 x 1000; 95% CI = 3.5-15.8) and four (33%) were male (1:251; 4.0 x 1000; 95% Cl = 1.1-10.2). Although eight new patients were considered to be asymptomatic, three presented with a subclinical course and one was classically symptomatic. Only one patient had been previously diagnosed with celiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our screening protocol showed a very high prevalence of celiac disease for an urban area of Argentina that is ethnically similar to 90% of the general population of the country. The prevalence among women was double that for men, and the heterogeneous clinical picture of new patients showed predominance of asymptomatic cases.     

Antiendomysium versus antigliadin antibodies in screening the general population for coeliac disease

BACKGROUND: It has recently been shown that mass screening for coeliac disease, using either the serum antigliadin (AGA) or antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) as screening test, can detect large numbers of cases that had escaped clinical diagnosis. The influence of the diagnostic algorithm on the results of the coeliac screening has not yet been evaluated. Our aim was to compare the validity of the AGA and the EMA protocols in 2096 students living in northwest Sardinia, who took part in a serologic screening for coeliac disease. METHODS: The sample included 2096 of 2345 eligible students (89%) aged 11-15 years who underwent serum IgG AGA, IgA AGA, and IgA EMA determinations. Total serum IgA level was measured in sera showing isolated IgG AGA positivity. Subjects showing at least one of the following: a) EMA positivity, b) IgA AGA positivity, or c) IgG AGA positivity and IgA deficiency (<5 mg/dl) were asked to submit to a small-intestinal biopsy. RESULTS: The prevalence of coeliac disease was 19 (16 showing typical enteropathy, 1 potential case, and 2 known cases) of 2096 (0.91%; 95% confidence interval = 0.50-1.31). Seventeen small-intestinal biopsy specimens were needed to confirm 16 cases of manifest coeliac disease (positive predictive value (PPV) = 94%) by the EMA protocol, whereas the AGA protocol required 21 biopsy specimens for 12 cases of coeliac disease (PPV = 57%). None of six IgA-deficient, IgG AGA-positive cases detected by the AGA protocol also had coeliac disease. CONCLUSIONS: The EMA protocol is superior to the AGA protocol for mass screening of coeliac disease because of higher sensitivity, decreased need for intestinal biopsy, and possibility to detect potential cases of coeliac disease.     

Antiendomysium versus Antigliadin Antibodies in Screening the General Population for Coeliac Disease

Background: It has recently been shown that mass screening for coeliac disease, using either the serum antigliadin (AGA) or antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) as screening test, can detect large numbers of cases that had escaped clinical diagnosis. The influence of the diagnostic algorithm on the results of the coeliac screening has not yet been evaluated. Our aim was to compare the validity of the AGA and the EMA protocols in 2096 students living in northwest Sardinia, who took part in a serologic screening for coeliac disease. Methods: The sample included 2096 of 2345 eligible students (89%) aged 11-15 years who underwent serum IgG AGA, IgA AGA, and IgA EMA determinations. Total serum IgA level was measured in sera showing isolated IgG AGA positivity. Subjects showing at least one of the following: a) EMA positivity, b) IgA AGA positivity, or c) IgG AGA positivity and IgA deficiency (&lt;5 mg/dl) were asked to submit to a small-intestinal biopsy. Results: The prevalence of coeliac disease was 19 (16 showing typical enteropathy, 1 potential case, and 2 known cases) of 2096 (0.91%; 95% confidence interval = 0.50-1.31). Seventeen small-intestinal biopsy specimens were needed to confirm 16 cases of manifest coeliac disease (positive predictive value (PPV) = 94%) by the EMA protocol, whereas the AGA protocol required 21 biopsy specimens for 12 cases of coeliac disease (PPV = 57%). None of six IgA-deficient, IgG AGA-positive cases detected by the AGA protocol also had coeliac disease. Conclusions: The EMA protocol is superior to the AGA protocol for mass screening of coeliac disease because of higher sensitivity, decreased need for intestinal biopsy, and possibility to detect potential cases of coeliac disease.     

Co-existence of coeliac disease and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in children: screening sera using an ELISA test for gliadin antibody

The prevalence of coeliac disease in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was investigated using a screening test of serum for antigliadin antibody by ELISA. One hundred and eighty (180) unselected diabetic children were screened for IgA and IgG class antigliadin antibodies (AGA); children with either grossly elevated or slightly elevated AGA had small bowel biopsies. The four children with the highest IgA AGA had total villous atrophy. These four children were considered to have unsuspected coeliac disease. The prevalence of coeliac disease in this group of children was one in 45. Anri-gliadin IgA and IgG tests are suitable for screening children at high risk of having coeliac disease.     

Predictive value of serological tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease

In the diagnostic work-up of celiac disease (CD) the simpler enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the identification of serum anti-transglutaminase (tTG) autoantibodies could substitute the immunofluorescence technique used for the detection of anti-endomysial antibodies (EmA). However, most of the studies on anti-tTG assay have considered pre-selected groups of patients and not consecutive subjects with suspected CD. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA), EmA and two anti-tTG ELISAs, one based on guinea pig (gp)-tTG and the other on human (h)-tTG as antigens, in consecutive patients investigated for suspected CD. The study included 130 consecutive patients (age range 16-84 years), who underwent intestinal biopsy for suspected CD. They presented with one or more of the following symptoms: weight loss, anemia, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, alternating bowel habits and constipation. At the time of admission in the study, an intestinal biopsy was performed and a serum sample was taken for immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA AGA, IgA EmA, anti-gp-tTG and anti-h-TG determination. Intestinal histology revealed that 15 patients had partial or total villous atrophy. In these patients the diagnosis of CD was confirmed at subsequent follow-up. The remaining 115 patients included in the study had an intestinal histology characterized by a normal villi/crypts ratio and were considered as controls. Serum EmA, anti-gp-tTG, and anti-h-tTG were positive in all the 15 CD subjects, whereas IgG and IgA AGA were positive in 10/15; in the control group, none were positive for serum EmA, but 11/115 (10%) were positive for anti-gp-tTG and 6/115 (5%) were positive for anti-h-tTG. The sensitivity was 100% for EmA, gp-tTG and h-tTG and 66% for IgA and IgG AGA. The specificity was 100% for EmA, 90% for anti-gp-tTG, 95% for anti-h-tTG, 74% for IgG AGA and 87% for IgA AGA. The negative predictive value was 100% for EmA, anti-h-tTG and anti-gp-tTG, 94% for IgG AGA and 95% for IgA AGA. The positive predictive value was 100% for EmA, 71% for anti-h-tTG (p = 0.03 vs EmA) and 58% for anti-gp-tTG (p = 0.003 vs EmA). Most of the patients who were false positive for anti-tTG had Crohn's disease or chronic liver disease. In conclusion, although both the anti-tTG ELISAs evaluated in the present study showed an optimum sensitivity, their low specificity determined positive predictive values which were significantly lower than those of EmA assay. Besides, the positive predictive value of gp-tTG was too low to warrant submitting a patient to intestinal biopsy for suspected CD.     

Adherence to gluten-free diet and serum antigliadin antibodies in celiac disease

In 134 patients with celiac disease the compliance with a gluten-free diet (GFD) and the presence of antigliadin antibodies (AGA) were evaluated. Compliance with the GFD was good in 71%, moderate in 11% and poor in 18%. High levels of AGA (IgA and IgG) were found in 24.2% of patients with good GFD, in 40% of those with moderate GFD and in 75% of those with poor GFD compliance. Our data suggest that the presence of AGA is correlated with the degree of adherence to the GFD, and that AGA measurement may be of some value in the monitoring of GFD in patients with celiac disease.     

Screening for adult coeliac disease – which serological marker(s) to use?

OBJECTIVE: To determine which serological marker(s) to use when screening for coeliac disease. DESIGN: In a population-based cross-sectional study we compared the use of antigliadin antibodies (AGA) of isotypes IgA and IgG, antiendomysial antibodies (AEA) of isotype IgA and antitransglutaminase antibodies (ATGA) of isotype IgA for detecting coeliac disease amongst adults. SETTING: Northern Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 1850 of 2500 (74%) invited adults (aged 25-74 years) who were randomly selected from the population register after stratification for age and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the AGA, ATGA and AEA tests. RESULTS: Nine cases of biopsy proven, previously undiagnosed coeliac disease were detected by screening. The sensitivity of both ATGA and AEA was 100% whilst AGA IgA and IgG both had a sensitivity of 89%. The AEA test had a specificity of 100% whereas the specificities of the ATGA, AGA IgA and IgG tests were 97, 96 and 78%, respectively. The positive predictive value for the AEA test was 100%, whereas it was considerably lower for the other tests (ATGA > AGA IgA > AGA IgG), with further decreases for all tests when shifting from a clinical to a screening situation. CONCLUSIONS: When screening for coeliac disease we suggest a serial testing approach, i.e. an initial ATGA test and, when positive, followed by an AEA test, provided that IgA deficiency has been excluded. However, assessment of the small intestinal mucosal morphology is still required to ascertain the diagnosis.     

Levels of serologic markers of celiac disease in patients with reflux esophagitis

INTRODUCTION Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by damage of the mucosa of the small intestine[1,2]. CD is induced in sensitive individuals by the ingestion of gluten and may range from overt malabsorption to few or no sy…     

Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: We have undertaken a study to assess the efficiency of serological tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) during the period January 1, 1994 to January 7, 1997. Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity of IgA antiendomysium (EMA) and IgA antigliadin (AGA) with regard to the degree of histological abnormality in biopsy specimens of small intestine in untreated celiac disease patients and first-degree relatives. METHODS: The study population comprised 101 cases: 85 untreated celiac patients and 16 first-degree relatives with a mean age of 42 yr (range, 2-76 yrs). Sixteen of 85 were excluded from study because they did not satisfy the study or diagnostic criteria of CD. EMA and AGA have been compared with the degree of villous atrophy (VA) in 69 celiac patients and 16 relatives according to the Marsh criteria of 1992. We divided the Marsh III histology into three subgroups as follows: Marsh IIIa (partial VA), Marsh IIIb (subtotal VA), and Marsh IIIc (total villous atrophy). RESULTS: The specificity and positive predictive value of EMA for CD was excellent, because all EMA-positive patients (n = 42) were diagnosed with CD. The sensitivity of EMA, however, differed between CD subgroups; in patients with total VA, the sensitivity of EMA was 100% (17/17). However, in patients with partial VA (Marsh IIIa), the sensitivity of EMA was disappointing, only 9/29 (31%). Three of 72 celiacs with Marsh IIIb and Marsh IIIc had IgA deficiency and were excluded from the study. Elevated AGA has been detected in the sera of 39 of 69 (62%) patients. A combination of EMA and AGA tests showed a sensitivity of 76% (53/69). None of 16 first-degree relatives with Marsh I-II had positive EMA. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of negative serology needs great awareness. Although EMA sensitivity in total villous atrophy is excellent, in partial villous atrophy the sensitivity of EMA appears to be disappointing. Our experience shows that EMA and AGA have only limited value in screening programs for CD.     

Low prevalence of antigliadin and anti-endomysium antibodies in subclinical/silent celiac disease

OBJECTIVE: Endomysial antibodies (EMA) are a well-known hallmark of celiac disease, but some recent studies showed that the prevalence of these antibodies in clinical practice is lower than expected. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of antigliadin (AGA) and EMA antibodies on a consecutive series of subclinical/silent celiac patients. METHODS: We studied 115 consecutive patients with subclinical (92 patients) or silent (23 patients) forms of celiac disease. AGA and EMA were screened in all patients. Histopathology of celiac disease was expressed according to the Marsh classification. RESULTS: The overall AGA in subclinical form were positive in 77% (14 of 18) of patients with partial villous atrophy (VA), in 84% (21 of 25) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 90% (27 of 30) of patients with total VA, whereas EMA were positive in 88.88% (16 of 18) of patients with partial VA, in 92% (23 of 25) of patients with subtotal VA, and 96.66% (29 of 30) of patients with total VA. On the other hand, AGA were positive in 0% (zero of two) of patients with Marsh I and in 30% (three of 10) of patients with Marsh II, whereas EMA were positive in 0% (zero of two) of patients with Marsh I and in 40% (four of 10) of patients with Marsh II (Marsh I-IIIa vs Marsh IIIb-c, p = < 0.005 in overall AGA-positive patients and p = < 0.0001 in EMA-positive patients). At the same time the overall AGA in silent form were positive in 60% (three of five) of patients with partial VA, in 66.66% (four of six) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 77.77% (seven of nine) of patients with total VA, whereas EMA were positive in 80% (four of five) of patients with partial VA, in 83.33% (five of six) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 88.88% (eight of nine) of patients with total VA. On the other hand, overall AGA were positive in 0% of patients with both Marsh I (zero of one) and Marsh II (zero of two), as well as EMA were positive in 0% with both Marsh I (zero of one) and Marsh II (zero of two) (Marsh I-IIIa vs Marsh IIIb-c, p = < 0.001 in overall AGA-positive patients and p = < 0.007 in EMA-positive patients). CONCLUSIONS: At this time small bowel biopsy seems to be the only correct procedure to diagnose a case of suspected celiac disease, especially in patients with mild symptoms or suspected for celiac disease, because they belong to high-risk groups.     

Seroreactivity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae in patients with Crohn′s disease and celiac disease

AIM:To explore whether there was anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) positivity in our patients with biopsy-confirmed celiac disease.METHODS: A cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (42 patients with Crohn's disease and 10 patients with ulcerative colitis) and gluten sensitive enteropathy (16patients) from Debrecen, Hungary were enrolled in the study.The diagnosis was made using the formally accepted criteria.Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA)and antiS-accharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA),antiendornysium antibodies (EMA), antigliadin antibodies (AGA) and anti human tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA) were investigated.RESULTS: The results showed that ASCA positivity occurred not only in Crohn's disease but also in Celiac disease and in these cases both the IgG and IgA type antibodies were proved.CONCLUSION: It is conceivable that ASCA positivity correlates with the (auto-) immune inflammation of small intestines and it is a specific marker of Crohn's disease.     

A controlled,prospective screening study of celiac disease presenting as iron deficiency anemia

BACKGROUND: anemia is the most frequent presenting feature of celiac disease in adults using endomysial antibody (EmA) screening. Endomysial antibody screening of anemia may allow detection of celiac disease at an earlier stage of investigation and after a shorter duration of symptoms. The characteristics of celiac patients identified by screening require further study. GOALS: a goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of celiac disease in adult patients with iron deficiency anemia compared with a nonanemic control population using immunoglobulin A (IgA) EmA screening. We also studied the positive predictive value (PPV) of the EmA assay and correlated the severity of histologic abnormalities in distal duodenal biopsy samples with EmA and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody titer. STUDY: four hundred eighty-four patients with microcytic, hypochromic anemia underwent IgA EmA assay. Four hundred ninety-eight nonanemic age- and sex-matched patients from the same source comprised the control group. Patients with positive serology results were invited for endoscopic duodenal biopsies. RESULTS: one in 44 anemic patients was diagnosed with histologically confirmed celiac disease compared with one in 498 nonanemic patients ( < 0.01). Fifty percent of women were premenopausal, and 25% of patients were older than 65 years. The PPV for EmA assay varied between 73% and 93% for anemic patients and improved at higher antibody titer, with all false-positive results occurring at the lowest titers. CONCLUSIONS: screening for celiac disease using IgA EmA assay is effective in anemic patients, including premenopausal women and patients older than 65 years, and it can be recommended in clinical practice.     

Is small bowel biopsy necessary in adults with suspected celiac disease and IgA anti-endomysium antibodies?

The comparative diagnostic value of IgA anti-endomysium and IgA antigliadin antibodies in adults with histologically confirmed celiac disease is reported. Sera from 144 adult patients (without concurrent dermatitis herpetiformis or IgA deficiency) who underwent small bowel biopsy were analyzed for both IgA anti-endomysium and IgA anti-gliadin antibodies. Nineteen patients (13%) had celiac disease. The presence of IgA antiendomysium antibodies had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 96%, respectively, and the diagnostic accuracy was 97%. In contrast, IgA anti-gliadin antibodies had positive and negative predictive values of 28% and 96%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 71%. Based on these data, we suggest that small bowel biopsy is not necessary to diagnose celiac disease in symptomatic adults with IgA antiendomysium antibodies. Due to a negative predictive value of 96%, some symptomatic adults lacking anti-endomysium antibodies will not be correctly diagnosed without small bowel biopsy.