Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

A prospective evaluation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing operative treatment was performed using treadmill-bicycle functional testing as well as Oswestry and Visual Analog Pain scales for self-assessment. Thirty-two patients undergoing spinal stenosis decompression with and without a concomitant spinal fusion were prospectively evaluated, preoperatively and a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Surgical treatment was demonstrated to produce significant improvement in walking ability, and to a lesser degree, in the ability to bicycle 2 years postoperatively. Improvement in patient function demonstrated on the Oswestry questionnaire correlated with decreased pain observed on the Visual Analog Pain scale. The treadmill-bicycle test appears to be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of neurogenic claudication and may be used as an objective test of postoperative outcome.     

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR Imaging

Because neither the degree of constriction of the spinal canal considered to be symptomatic for lumbar spinal stenosis nor the relationship between the clinical appearance and the degree of a radiologically verified constriction is clear, a correlation of patient’s disability level and radiographic constriction of the lumbar spinal canal is of interest. The aim of this study was to establish a relationship between the degree of radiologically established anatomical stenosis and the severity of self-assessed Oswestry Disability Index in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Sixty-three consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who were scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and completed a self-assessment Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire. Quantitative image evaluation for lumbar spinal stenosis included the dural sac cross-sectional area, and qualitative evaluation of the lateral recess and foraminal stenosis were also performed. Every patient subsequently answered the national translation of the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire and the percentage disability was calculated. Statistical analysis of the data was performed to seek a relationship between radiological stenosis and percentage disability recorded by the Oswestry Disability Index. Upon radiological assessment, 27 of the 63 patients evaluated had severe and 33 patients had moderate central dural sac stenosis; 11 had grade 3 and 27 had grade 2 nerve root compromise in the lateral recess; 22 had grade 3 and 37 had grade 2 foraminal stenosis. On the basis of the percentage disability score, of the 63 patients, 10 patients demonstrated mild disability, 13 patients moderate disability, 25 patients severe disability, 12 patients were crippled and three patients were bedridden. Radiologically, eight patients with severe central stenosis and nine patients with moderate lateral stenosis demonstrated only minimal disability on percentage Oswestry Disability Index scores. Statistical evaluation of central and lateral radiological stenosis versus Oswestry Disability Index percentage scores showed no significant correlation. In conclusion, lumbar spinal stenosis remains a clinico-radiological syndrome, and both the clinical picture and the magnetic resonance imaging findings are important when evaluating and discussing surgery with patients having this diagnosis. MR imaging has to be used to determine the levels to be decompressed.     

Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis

The clinical outcome of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) was assessed during a follow-up period of 2 years after X-Stop implantation. The X-Stop is the most commonly used interspinous distraction device in patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication due to LSS. Between 2003 and 2007, more than 1,000 patients were examined in our centre with symptoms of intermittent claudication due to spinal stenosis. Between February 2003 and June 2007, in 175 of these patients an X-Stop device was implanted in one or two levels. Patients were clinically evaluated regularly during a follow-up period of up to 4 years using the VAS (leg pain) score and the Oswestry disability index. The mean VAS (leg pain) score in these 175 patients was reduced from 61.2% preoperatively to 39.0% at the first clincal follow-up examination at 6 weeks postoperatively. The mean VAS score at 24 months postoperatively was 39.0%. Oswestry score was 32.6% preoperatively, 22.7% at 6 weeks, and 20.3% at 24 months postoperatively on average. In eight out of the implanted 175 patients, the X-Stop had to be removed and a microsurgical decompression had to be performed because of unsatisfactory effect of the interspinous distraction device. Our single-centre results indicate not only a satisfactory short-term, but also a good long-term effect during a follow-up period of 2 years. Functional MRI examinations provide helpful, positional-dependent preoperative information. More than any radiological feature, the typical clinical picture of positional-dependent claudication with a relief of symptoms during flexion is the most important factor for appropriate patient selection. The interspinous device does not replace microsurgical decompression in patients with massive stenosis and continuous claudication, but offers a save, effective and less invasive alternative in selected patients with spinal stenosis. Concerning the operative technique, a minimally invasive implantation with preservation of the interspinous ligament is appropriate. Functional (upright-) MRI examinations were able to demonstrate the positional-dependent stenosis. If available, fMRI represents the most helpful radiologic examination in assessing the outcome of interspinous spacer implantation.     

Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study

X-STOP is the first interspinous process decompression device that was shown to be superior to nonoperative therapy in patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to spinal stenosis in the multicenter randomized study at 1 and 2 years. We present 4-year follow-up data on the X-STOP patients. Patient records were screened to identify potentially eligible subjects who underwent X-STOP implantation as part of the FDA clinical trial. The inclusion criteria for the trial were age of at least 50 years, leg, buttock, or groin pain with or without back pain relieved during flexion, being able to walk at least 50 feet and sit for at least 50 minutes. The exclusion criteria were fixed motor deficit, cauda equina syndrome, previous lumbar surgery or spondylolisthesis greater than grade I at the affected level. Eighteen X-STOP subjects participated in the study. The average follow-up was 51 months and the average age was 67 years. Twelve patients had the X-STOP implanted at either L3-4 or L4-5 levels. Six patients had the X-STOP implanted at both L3-4 and L4-5 levels. Six patients had a grade I spondylolisthesis. The mean preoperative Oswestry score was 45. The mean postoperative Oswestry score was 15. The mean improvement score was 29. Using a 15-point improvement from baseline Oswestry Disability Index score as a success criterion, 14 out of 18 patients (78%) had successful outcomes. Our results have demonstrated that the success rate in the X-STOP interspinous process decompression group was 78% at an average of 4.2 years postoperatively and are consistent with 2-year results reported by Zucherman et al previously and those reported by Lee et al. Our results suggest that intermediate-term outcomes of X-STOP surgery are stable over time as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index.     

Treatment approach in tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis

Spondylotic degeneration can manifest as tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. The primary manifestations include neurogenic claudication, gait disturbance and a mixture of findings of myelopathy and polyradiculopathy in both the upper and lower extremities. The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the existence and management of tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. Between 1998 and 2004, 8 patients (6 women and 2 men) were diagnosed with tandem spinal stenosis in a series of 230 patients who underwent surgery for spinal stenosis (3.4%). Three patients received cervical surgery first and 5 patients lumbar surgery first. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score of all patients improved from an average of 8.1 preoperatively to an average of 11.8 points at discharge and maintained an average of 12.7 points at final follow-up. Oswestry Disability Score improved from mean 58.1 to 29 at discharge and 19.3 at latest follow-up. All the patients had excellent or good results and none deteriorated neurologically. Although tandem spinal stenosis occurred relatively infrequently, we concluded that its possible presence should not be overlooked. The treatment plan must be designed according to the chief complaints and symptoms of the patient.     

Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort

Study design  Prospective study on clinical outcome of interspinous process distraction with X-STOP in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Purpose  To determine the safety and efficacy of X-STOP interspinous distractor. Method  A total of 45 patients (24 males, 21 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with X-STOP system. They had preoperative and postoperative (3, 6 and 12 months) assessments using the Back and Sciatica Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF12 Questionnaire. Patient satisfaction was assessed at each visit. Results  The average VAS of back and leg pain was 6.7 and 6.8 preoperatively and improved to 2.7 and 2.8 postoperatively. A total of 68% had improvement in their walking distance following the operation. The average preoperative ODI of 42% improved to 16.38% postoperatively (P < 0.0001). A total of 70% of patients had improvement in physical score and 80% in mental score. A total of 82% were very satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Conclusion  X-STOP implant is clinically effective with fewer complications and it is a simple procedure.     

Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Background context

The psychometric properties of many outcome tools commonly used with patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have yet to be examined.

Purpose

Examine the test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important differences for several outcome measures in a cohort of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Study design/setting

Cohort secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis receiving outpatient physical therapy.

Patient sample

Fifty-five patients (mean age, 69.5 years; standard deviation, ±7.9 years; 43.1% females) presenting with lumbar spinal stenosis to physical therapy.

Outcome measures

The Modified Oswestry Disability Index, Modified Swiss Spinal Stenosis Scale (SSS), Patient Specific Functional Scale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Methods

All patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and NPRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up. In addition, patients completed a 15-point Global Rating of Change at follow-up, which was used to categorize whether patients experienced clinically meaningful change. Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and NPRS were then used to assess test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important differences.

Results

The Oswestry Disability Index was the only outcome measure to exhibit excellent test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.63–0.93). All others ranged between fair and moderate. The Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, and Patient Specific Functional Scale exhibited varying levels of responsiveness, each of which was superior to the NPRS. The minimal clinically important difference for the Oswestry Disability Index was five points, the SSS was 0.36 and 0.10 for symptoms subscale and functional subscale, respectively, 1.3 for the Patient Specific Functional Scale, and for the NPRS, 1.25 for back/buttock symptoms and 1.5 for thigh/leg symptoms.

Conclusions

The results of our study indicate that the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, and Patient Specific Functional Scale possess adequate psychometric properties to be used in the outcome assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. However, further investigation is needed to validate these findings in other samples of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and nonspecific low back pain.     

Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis via posterior reduction with minimal laminectomy

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is commonly treated with laminectomy. Recent reports have consistently supported the incremental clinical benefit of associated in situ arthrodesis with or without instrumentation. Resection of the lamina may result in intraoperative dural tear or epidural scar formation. Fifty-six consecutive patients with back pain, neuroclaudication, or both, in addition to degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, underwent a surgical procedure that incorporated fusion after reduction of the spondylolisthesis deformity with preservation of the lamina and the balance of the posterior elements. Clinical records were reviewed and patients interviewed at a mean of 33 months after surgery. Oswestry Disability Index scores were obtained independently at baseline and at a late review. Late imaging was available a mean of 28 months after operation. Clinical and imaging analyses and Oswestry scoring confirmed results comparable to the published outcomes of in situ fusion after formal laminectomy. Resection of the lamina may not be necessary in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis.     

Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study

The aim of our study is to evaluate the results and effectiveness of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We have conducted a prospective study to compare the midterm outcome of unilateral laminotomy with unilateral laminectomy. One hundred patients with 269 levels of lumbar stenosis without instability were randomized to two treatment groups: unilateral laminectomy (Group 1), and laminotomy (Group 2). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36). Spinal canal size was measured pre- and postoperatively. The spinal canal was increased to 4–6.1-fold (mean 5.1 ± SD 0.8-fold) the preoperative size in Group 1, and 3.3–5.9-fold (mean 4.7 ± SD 1.1-fold) the preoperative size in Group 2. The mean follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 4–7 years). The ODI scores decreased significantly in both early and late follow-up evaluations and the SF-36 scores demonstrated significant improvement in late follow-up results in our series. Analysis of clinical outcome showed no statistical differences between two groups. For degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis unilateral approaches allowed sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures and adequate preservation of vertebral stability, resulted in a highly significant reduction of symptoms and disability, and improved health-related quality of life.     

Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的早期疗效观察

[目的]比较髓核摘除术结合Wallis系统与单纯髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效.[方法]2008年2月～2010年2月采用髓核摘除术结合Wallis系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者18例,以同期行单纯髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的18例患者为对照组.术后12个月为观察点,采用下腰痛及腿痛的视觉模糊评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index,ODI)等指标来评估2组疗效.[结果]36例患者均获12 ～24个月随访,平均16个月,两组患者术后12个月的VAS评分及ODI指数均有明显下降,较术前比较有统计学意义(P=0.0000＜0.05),Wallis组术后12个月的下腰痛VAS评分及Oswestry指数与对照组比较有统计学意义(P =0.000 0 ＜0.05),而腿痛的VAS评分两组比较无统计学意义(P =0.074 ＞0.05).[结论]Wallis系统置入简单,创伤小,结合髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症能提高疗效.     

显微内窥镜下单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症

目的 探讨显微内窥镜下利用单侧入路双侧减压技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的手术适应证及临床疗效.方法 2005年2月至2007年6月,采用显微内窥镜下单侧入路双侧减压技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症患者53例,男36例,女17例;年龄52～75岁,平均57岁.全部病例均有腰痛、单侧或双侧下肢疼痛、麻木及神经性间歇性跛行病史,其中有双下肢症状者均自觉一侧下肢症状较重.所有患者术前均行腰椎X线摄片、CT、MR等影像学检查确诊为单节段腰椎椎管狭窄症,并结合临床表现排除退变性腰椎失稳、多节段腰椎椎管狭窄.术后患者获得平均16个月(8～26个月)的随访,采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)及腰椎功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评定患者手术后的疗效.结果 术后无硬脊膜撕裂、神经根损伤等严重并发症发生.VAS及ODI评定结果显示患者手术前后的VAS及ODI分值改变有统计学意义(P<0.01).术后CT显示椎管得到有效扩大,解剖结构破坏较少.结论 显微内窥镜下单侧入路双侧减压技术减压效果良好,复发率低,适用于早期症状较轻的单节段腰椎椎管狭窄症患者.     

Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial designed to compare interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage management for low back pain in a primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the outcome of interferential therapy and management by motorized lumbar traction and massage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Management of low back pain by interferential therapy and motorized lumbar traction and massage is common in Germany. No reports of previous randomized trials for the outcome from interferential therapy were found. METHODS: Consenting patients were randomly assigned into one of two groups. A pretreatment interview was performed by the patient using a computer-based questionnaire. It also incorporated the Oswestry Disability Index and a pain visual analog scale. Management consisted of six sessions over a 2- to 3-week period. Oswestry Disability Indexes and pain visual analog scale scores also were obtained immediately after and at 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were recruited. The two treatment groups had similar demographic and clinical baseline characteristics. The mean Oswestry Disability Index before treatment was 30 for both groups (n = 147). After treatment, this had dropped to 25, and, at 3 months, were 21 (interferential therapy) and 22 (motorized lumbar traction and massage). The mean pain visual analog scale score before treatment was 50 (interferential therapy) and 51 (motorized lumbar traction and massage). This had dropped, respectively, to 46 and 44 after treatment and to 42 and 39 at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a progressive fall in Oswestry Disability Index and pain visual analog scale scores in patients with low back pain treated with either-interferential therapy or motorized lumbar traction and massage. There was no difference in the improvement between the two groups at the end of treatment. Although there is evidence from several trials that traction alone is ineffective in the management of low back pain, this study could not exclude some effect from the concomitant massage.     

The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, clinical study to evaluate surgical decompression of the stenotic area monitored by computed tomographic scan and its relation to clinical variables in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis the influence of the degree of compressive relief on the patients' clinical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The goal of surgical treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis is to decompress the stenotic area. Although the decompression should be adequate, there are no clear guidelines to determine the extent of necessary decompression. In fact, there is clinical evidence that there is a discrepancy between the surgical outcome in the patient with lumbar spinal stenosis and postoperative radiologic findings. METHODS: In 92 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had had no prior back surgery, preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans were obtained to determine the degree of decompression. The postoperative scan findings were classified according to the degree of decompression into a no-stenosis group (n = 35), an adjacent-stenosis group (n = 27), and a residual-stenosis group (n = 30). The postoperative instability of the lumbar spine was investigated by functional radiography. The subjective disability of the patients was assessed using the Oswestry score and the severity of pain using the visual analog scale. Walking capacity was evaluated by a treadmill test. The patients' estimations of the results of surgery were classified into groups of satisfied patients and dissatisfied patients. RESULTS: The mean Oswestry score in all 92 patients was 27.1, and mean walking capacity was 630 m. In the satisfied patients, the Oswestry score was 18.8 and in the dissatisfied patients, 34.9 (P < 0.0000). Walking capacity was 690 m and 594 m, respectively. There were 30 patients with postoperative spinal instability, but it had no influence on surgical outcome. There were no differences in the Oswestry score, walking capacity, and patients' satisfaction among the postoperative CT groups. In the linear regression analysis, the satisfied patient corresponded significantly with the Oswestry score. CONCLUSIONS: The satisfaction of the patients with the results of surgery was more important in surgical outcome than the degree of decompression detected on computed tomographic scan.     

Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUNDDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition, predominantly affecting middle-aged and elderly people. This study focused on patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis or deformity.PURPOSETo determine whether the addition of fusion to decompression resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 3, 12, and 24 months postsurgery.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThe Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective database that includes pre- and postoperative data from tertiary care hospitals.PATIENT SAMPLEThe CSORN database was queried for consecutive spine surgery cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis receiving surgical decompression for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy. Neurogenic claudication patients with baseline and 2-year follow-up data, from four sites, formed the study sample (n=306). The sample was categorized into two groups: (1) those that had decompression alone, and (2) those that underwent decompression plus fusion.OUTCOME MEASURESChange in modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scale for back/leg pain, the EuroQol EQ5D, the SF-12 physical, and mental component scores. The primary outcome measure was the ODI at 2 years postoperative.METHODSWe conducted a multicenter, ambispective review of consecutive spine surgery patients enrolled between October 2012 and January 2018.RESULTSBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for female sex and multilevel pathology (both with greater proportion in the decompression plus fusion group). The decompression plus fusion group had clinically meaningfully more operative time, blood loss, rate of perioperative complication, and length of hospital stay (p<.05). These differences were preserved following adjustment for baseline differences between the groups.Both decompression and decompression plus fusion had a large clinically meaningful impact on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures within 3 months of surgery which was maintained out to 24-month follow-up. At any follow-up time point, there was no statistical evidence of a difference in these effects favoring decompression plus fusion over decompression alone.CONCLUSIONSThe addition of fusion to decompression did not result in improved outcomes at 3-, 12-, or 24-month follow-up. The addition of fusion to decompression provides no advantage to decompression alone for the treatment of patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis or deformity.     

Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Objective： To propose a new technique to treat lumbar spinal stenosis with median approach endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion and evaluate the initial clinical outcome.
Methods： This study involved 30 patients who had neurogenic commitment claudication over 2 years and were resistant to conservative therapy. All cases were treated using the median approach endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion in 2006. Clinical signs and radicular pain were noted and evaluated preoperatively and at the 1st month and 3rd month postoperatively. Japanese Orthopedic Association （JOA） score was used to evaluate leg and back pain. X-ray films at flexion and extension were applied to evaluate the range of motion at involved segments. Results： There was a significant increase in JOA score postoperatively, but no significant difference preoperatively or postoperatively between the two groups.The range of motion at involved segments was significantly higher in the control group.
Conclusions： The median approach endoscopic decompression is an ideal method for bilateral radiculopathy resulting from lumbar spinal canal stenosis. The combination with interspinous process implant fusion can stabilize the spine. The initial clinical outcome is exllent. Preservation of adjacent level disease can be assessed only in long-term follow-up.     

Effect of long spinal fusion including the pelvis on activities of daily living related to lumbar spinal function in adults with spinal deformity

BackgroundSpinal sagittal malalignment is managed by long spinal fusion including the pelvis, which reduces lumbar spine range of motion and impairs the activities of daily living. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in activities of daily living after long spinal fusion in adults with spinal deformity, and clarify the improvement or deterioration in the specific activities of daily living postoperatively.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 40 adults who underwent long spinal fusion in a single institution between 2014 and 2016 (female/male, 39/1; mean age, 68.5 years; range, 52–79 years). Each patient undertook three self-assessed health-related quality of life measures preoperatively and again at 2-years postoperatively: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Radiographic outcomes were measured preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively.ResultsTotal ODI and all SRS-22 domains were improved at 2 years postoperatively. The JOABPEQ scores were also improved in all domains, except lumbar function. The change in pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis correlated with improvements in total ODI, SRS-22 function, and self-image scores. At 2 years postoperatively, satisfaction was correlated with total ODI, all SRS-22 domains, and the JOABPEQ pain domain. Subclass analysis of the JOABPEQ lumbar function domain at 2 years postoperatively revealed that 65% of patients had difficulty ‘putting on socks or stockings’, 42% had great difficulty ‘bending forward, kneeling, or stooping’, 32% reported improvement in ‘sit to stand’, and 32% reported deterioration in ‘putting on socks or stockings’ after surgery compared with before surgery. The JOABPEQ lumbar function domain was not correlated with the SRS-22 satisfaction domain.ConclusionsDespite restricting lumbar function, spinopelvic fusion improves health-related quality of life. Surgeons and patients should discuss potential changes and limitations in the activities of daily living after long spinal fusion including the pelvis.     

Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study to observe the correlation between postoperation findings shown on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical observations of 56 patients 10 years after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between postoperation findings on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical outcome in patients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis is based on the compression seen in radiologic imaging of neurovascular structures in the vertebral canal, but the success of surgical decompression and its correlation with clinical observations very seldom have been monitored by postoperation radiologic imaging. METHODS: In this study, 56 patients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis were re-examined clinically by use of the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Their walking capacity was evaluated by the treadmill test. Severity of pain before and after the treadmill test was investigated using a visual analog scale. Patients' perception of improvement measured as the change in their condition during the preceding 5 years was elicited by a questionnaire. On the basis of the stenotic findings on magnetic resonance imaging, the patients were classified into no stenosis (NoSten, n = 15) and stenosis (Sten, n = 41) groups, and a summative degenerative scale also was constructed with the findings categorized as follows: disc degeneration, disc herniation, facet joint arthrosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. RESULTS: Whereas the patients' perception of improvement correlated very strongly with the Oswestry score and walking capacity, there was no statistical difference between the NoSten and Sten groups in the Oswestry score, walking capacity, perception of improvement, or severity of pain. The effect of the summative degenerative scale on the patients' walking capacity was 13 times greater than the effect of the minimum area of the dural sac. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perception of improvement had a much stronger correlation with long-term surgical outcome than structural findings seen on postoperation magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, degenerative findings had a greater effect on patients' walking capacity than stenotic findings.     

"开窗技术"治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症融合指征

目的 探讨初次"开窗技术"治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症融合的指征.方法 对1999年12月至2005年12月收治的145例退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者进行回顾性研究.按术前腰椎条件及手术方法分三组:A组39例,术前合并腰椎失稳运动、退变性滑脱或侧弯,行融合术;B组31例,术前合并腰椎失稳运动、退变性滑脱或侧弯,行非融合术;c组75例,术前无腰椎失稳运动、退变性滑脱或侧 弯,行非融合术.对患者住院天数、手术时间、估计出血量复发、再手术及并发症情况等进行统计分析;采用Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及满意率等进行疗效评估,并进行统计学分析.结果 所有患者随访时间均在3年以上.C组的住院时间少于A组和B组(P<0.05);A组的手术时间和估计出血量均大于B组和c组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A、C组长 期疗效优于B组(P<0.05),而A、c两组间差异无统计学意义;三组间的复发或残余症状恶化、再手术及并发症等方面差异没有统计学意义.结论 对于术前合并腰椎失稳、滑脱或侧凸的退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者,即使初次行"开窗技术"减压,也应融合;单纯狭窄患者初次手术则无需融合.     

改良侧入路椎间孔镜技术治疗L5/S1节段椎管狭窄症

目的探讨采用改良侧入路经皮椎间孔镜技术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)治疗L5/S1节段椎管狭窄症的安全性及有效性。方法2014年4月~2018年6月,采用改良侧入路PELD治疗L5/S1椎管狭窄症34例。用2 mm克氏针穿刺,环锯结合骨钻进行椎间孔成形,多种操作工具进行椎管内成形。结果手术时间(81.9±15.8)min,均获得6~12个月随访,平均8.1月。根据改良MacNab标准,优22例,良9例,可3例,优良率91.2%。术后1周、1个月及末次随访时腰痛、腿痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)较术前均有显著改善(P<0.01)。结论采用改良侧入路PELD技术治疗L5/S1节段椎管狭窄症效果确切,短期疗效良好。     

Short-term outcome of bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Forty consecutive patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were divided randomly into groups 1 and 2. Patients were treated with unilateral (group 1) or bilateral (group 2) pedicle screw fixation and bilateral decompression via 1-sided (group 1) or bilateral (group 2) paramedian approach. Perioperative parameters (operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications, and implant cost), clinical outcome parameters (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] scores, visual analog scale [VAS] scores, and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] preoperatively and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively), and radiologic parameters (radiograph and computed tomography [CT] scan preoperatively and at 1 week postoperatively) were compared.No differences were seen between groups 1 and 2 with respect to operation time, blood loss, or hospital stay. No complications were observed in either group. The ODI, JOA, and VAS values of both groups showed significant differences between the preoperative and 1-week or 3-month postoperative values. No significant differences were seen in the improvements of the ODI, JOA, and VAPS values between groups 1 and 2 at any postoperative time point. Postoperative CT indicated that the contralateral decompression was sufficient in both groups.The short-term results indicate that bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation is safe, feasible, and effective over the short-term and is more cost-efficient than a bilateral paramedian approach.